Shoreline Detectives: Explore this 1700s shipwreck in East Sussex

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ค. 2024
  • In East Sussex, UK, Tori and the team explore a shipwreck from the 1740s, discover a prehistoric well shaft, and investigate a harbor that took 63 years to build but only worked for four months.
    ---
    Every day, on a sandy beach or a rocky foreshore, fascinating historical evidence appears and disappears as the tide rolls in and rolls back out again across the British coastline. Palaeontologist Dr Tori Herridge and experts from CITiZAN (the Coastal & Inter-tidal Archaeological Network) investigate the stories behind these intriguing remains. From abandoned villages, prehistoric footprints, shipwrecks, submerged forests, we follow the clues to how people have survived on the coast, how they’ve learnt to live alongside the sea. It is an archaeological race against time as Shoreline Detectives battles to capture a vanishing past for us all to see.
    Tern TV Productions/DCD Rights
    #documentary #vanishing #shipwreck
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 67

  • @bevanpope7924
    @bevanpope7924 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    As a missive Time Team fan… I am here for the history aspect. Looking forward to watching more episodes. The shaft is just amazing… and the ship such a treasure.
    But must say that Charlotte is rather lovely - and without a wedding band. If I was in the UK I would take her out for a coffee.

    • @helenhunter4540
      @helenhunter4540 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Bevanpop37924. You're mistaken: you weren't COMPELLED to say what you said about Charlotte; you CHOSE to say it. It is not only an unnecessary comment; it is insulting. When listening to scholars and broadcasters, respect their work and comment only on that.

  • @davedavis9610
    @davedavis9610 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Thoroughly enjoyable. It was a great episode, well presented and thought out. Everyone on screen was knowledgeable and likeable. Well done to all involved.
    I'm looking forward to seeing more!
    Cheers.

  • @glennjames7107
    @glennjames7107 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Wonderful documentary !

  • @johncranwell3783
    @johncranwell3783 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I totally loved this thank you and stumbled the process it by accident…. I grew up just over the railway line from the Amsterdam ship wreck and all the other places mentioned were part of my childhood and early adult life before I moved away….. so totally and thoroughly interesting to learn these things that you shared. I was there on the beach the day after diggers came across the Amsterdam back in the 80s…. if I remember correctly, the contractors were digging to extend a sewer pipe when they came across the wreck of the ship…..
    Thank you for such an excellent program

  • @michaelpjeffries1521
    @michaelpjeffries1521 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wonderful presentation. I was arrested but had charges dismissed in Canterbury 1600's. Then out of Salem 1700's. It is amazing what is hidden in plain sight. Once one starts looking.

    • @danielwarren8539
      @danielwarren8539 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can click/touch on the settings icon and then turn on captions.

    • @danielwarren8539
      @danielwarren8539 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The settings icon looks like a cog on the top right corner of the screen. I have an android phone.
      May be different on an apple?

  • @glennjames7107
    @glennjames7107 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    As far as the ancient forest, where I live on the west coast of Florida, there are tree stumps in the gulf of Mexico, that I know of, in 20-25 feet of water off shore. The continental shelf here in what we call the big bend area of Florida's gulf coast is approximately 200 miles from the coast, and is very flat. Flat as in it is very shallow for quite a distance from shore.
    I've seen many tree stumps offshore in 20-30 foot of water while spear fishing.

  • @toodles53
    @toodles53 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    my dad and his brothers and friends used to go and play on this ship it was more intact then had a deck and cabin where they played pirates..

    • @bluenick4577
      @bluenick4577 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not sure if it is a serious comment or not

    • @sforza209
      @sforza209 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@bluenick4577why would it not be?! His dad could have been from many decades ago.

    • @lizbourn4192
      @lizbourn4192 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is untrue

  • @user-xq6me6pd7q
    @user-xq6me6pd7q หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That was a great programme. There are so many aspects of what is all around us that often becomes harder to see or understand. I live where there were many Napoleonic tunnels and forts but it has proven almost impossible to confirm the existence of some of them despite there being oddities that are visible. Perhaps its deliberate.

  • @Innperlenburg
    @Innperlenburg หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant programme. Thanks so much.

  • @harbourdogNL
    @harbourdogNL หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This was great. Thank you.

    • @PattrnPlanetUs
      @PattrnPlanetUs  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Stay tuned! We have a few more on the way.

  • @timtaylor1365
    @timtaylor1365 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Smeaton's idea of using the power of water flow to clear silt from a harbour was used successfully at Ramsgate harbour where they built an inner harbour after they found the original harbour was silting up. The inner harbour penned in the water at high tide and was released at low tide into the outer harbour, clearing the sand and silt.

    • @wmanad8479
      @wmanad8479 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The flow was too low to keep Rye clear, how could it be enough further away? And it appears from the contemporary map they installed locks to make that river and the other flowage into canals as well; that right there would kill any chance of a consistent current clearing silt. One wonders what were they thinking? Full at high tide, flush on the ebb?

  • @diannehardwick950
    @diannehardwick950 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fascinating study. Thank you.

  • @sabbyd1832
    @sabbyd1832 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Enjoyed, thanks

    • @PattrnPlanetUs
      @PattrnPlanetUs  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you enjoyed it! We've got some more episodes coming up.

    • @loopwithers
      @loopwithers หลายเดือนก่อน

      A fine documentary to introduce new viewers to how archaeology is carried out and how different specialists join together. Time does not stand still

  • @bobbydazzler3067
    @bobbydazzler3067 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this is excellent. as someone whos interested in all things both nautical and historical you might say it floated my boat. do you see what i did there? lol. thanks to all the team. cant wait for more

    • @PattrnPlanetUs
      @PattrnPlanetUs  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We are glad this one put wind in your sails. 😉 We'll have some more episodes coming out soon! Stay tuned.

  • @ian_b
    @ian_b หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I also think we need to find out who decided to build cliffs out of chalk, I bet it was some Labour council's idea.

    • @philipr1567
      @philipr1567 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      No, it was the thieving Tories who spent the money on themselves and their friends instead of buying quality stone.

    • @zen4men
      @zen4men 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@philipr1567
      Is that why social housing
      built by Labour councils
      is the greyist, grimmest grimiest place to live,
      and where mental illness
      is so common,
      hordes of university-trained Marxists
      depend upon it
      for their very comfortable livings?
      Conservatives have faults.
      Labour has faults.
      Both
      are directed by Marxism.
      /
      we need a new system of government.
      It is coming.
      And not WEF.
      /

  • @jean-pierredeclemy7032
    @jean-pierredeclemy7032 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Get rid of the annoying music and I might be able to hear you speaking

  • @garryburton-bz2nc
    @garryburton-bz2nc หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imagine what will be said of today's engineering fiasco's. HS2 anyone. This harbour will look like a raging success in comparison.

  • @johnbridger5629
    @johnbridger5629 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At Normans Bay there are a series of square/rectangular shapes in the shingle beach, outlined in wooden spindles, which sit between the high and low water lines. I have always wondered what these could be.

    • @Sparky68M
      @Sparky68M หลายเดือนก่อน

      Williams boats ! but the coast line was different then it was navigable up to Boreham bridge to the east & Hailsham way to the west.

  • @stevefletcher7531
    @stevefletcher7531 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Interesting programme, but your sound engineer/mixer/editor needs to find a new profession

  • @MarieJackson-sp3be
    @MarieJackson-sp3be หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please take care when going under cliffs that are actively eroding. And chalk is so soft! I don't want to hear in the news that four intrepid archeologists perished or were hurt while investigating shoreline archeology along the south coast of England. I am a geologist, and one day, my assistant and I were taking samples at the base of a cliff that had a slight overhang in Oklahoma. We quit when dusk came and planned to continue the next morning. When we arrived, the sampling site was buried under a cliff fail! We were sooooo lucky! Best of luck to all of you.
    LOL I thought the man in the green jacket was going to say about the 250 year old wreck south of Hastings that "if you dig down about a meter, you will find organic material...seeds, pollen, fingers..."

  • @lizbourn4192
    @lizbourn4192 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I would like to ask the presenters for this programme why they didn’t consult people who live on the Sussex coast who know about the sea? I would also like to tell them that the Amsterdam wreck was first revealed in the late 1960’s and not, as they claim, in the ‘80’s It was first noticed by the people installing an offshore pipe (if I remember correctly it was a company called William Press)A group of us went down on a low tide and were excited to find odd relics from the ship (the wine that was retrieved was undrinkable!!) The wreck can only be seen at very low tides. To say that the Amsterdam sank into the sand is just not factual ……….over time the sand has built up around the ship. There’s a difference.
    Also there has not always been sinking sand by the wreck. There wasn’t in the ‘60’s and ‘70’s……….the constant movement of the sea causes the shoreline to change. This is constant and therefore the shift in sand and shingle constantly changes. It will be refreshing when these “experts” realise that they cannot rule the sea!! There have been many efforts over the ages to rule the sea - none are successful, nor will they ever be.
    Silly comments such as saying that the sea level rising and has covered forest etc., is immediately argued against by saying that Rye was once on the coast!! The sea does its own thing. I don’t see the point in these programmes put together by experts”. Who pays them for presenting less than accurate information? Save me from academics!!!

  • @bazra19
    @bazra19 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Did Smeeton build the harbour so he could build the Beachhead Head lighthouse

  • @floridaseminole8643
    @floridaseminole8643 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just like the country fading away

  • @capt.bart.roberts4975
    @capt.bart.roberts4975 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Those "wreckers" came from Sussex and Kent.

  • @karenburke482
    @karenburke482 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What would the Chinese do? Master builders? The resources to reclaim it are there….think outside the box maybe?
    Create a ‘competition’ and/ or crowd source the solution needed?

  • @kennhansen9415
    @kennhansen9415 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why are all having safery jackets on???

  • @sforza209
    @sforza209 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I’m sorry but I don’t agree with that statement that people would willingly allow others to carve up their buildings like that. Since sailors were ship wrecked off the coast, they probably turned the church into temp housing and was filled to the brim with sailors. I’d like to imagine someone had their bed right next to the column and spent an insomniac night withering away the ship graffiti.

  • @aimeemorgado8715
    @aimeemorgado8715 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I found the organization of the presentation very confusing. An expensive program with very little archeological value.

  • @peyps2k
    @peyps2k หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is it an old dinghy used by immigrants to cross the channel?

  • @M.Godfrey
    @M.Godfrey 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    1:50 fart in a jar

  • @ian_b
    @ian_b หลายเดือนก่อน

    I asked these Shoreline so-called-"detectives" to find out who nicked my phone last August and they said it's not their job. So much for these so-called-"detectives".

  • @bazra19
    @bazra19 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Please take that awful un requested music off of the video, so that I can hear what is being said, otherwise what's the point of having the video at all.

  • @preonmodel9906
    @preonmodel9906 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Horrible editing going back and forth through the stories forcing the viewers to keep watching…
    I’ve got a headache

  • @sherrylelee8274
    @sherrylelee8274 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dreadful, overbearing, raucous music spoilt this documentary 😢

  • @justinmorgan2126
    @justinmorgan2126 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THey should just call this "things I found on the beach" because there is zero archaeology going on nor is there anything of any scientific interest at all.What's the point of this TV series? Seems like the cheapest possible way to fill schedule time with some tourism fluff. Time Team it is not.

  • @stephenjdixon1
    @stephenjdixon1 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    stick to things you know something about. The sea level is not rising

    • @sforza209
      @sforza209 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      lol. You mad? Many Polynesians will prob have a different opinion than that.

  • @colinlaird8992
    @colinlaird8992 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why are all these archeology programmes always presented by women? Wokeness gone mad! Bring back the men

    • @snafufubar
      @snafufubar หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wokeness? What exactly do you think being "woke" is?

    • @philipr1567
      @philipr1567 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@snafufubar "woke" = doing or thinking things which offend prejudiced bigots.

    • @lpeterman
      @lpeterman 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Wow, Misogynist much?

    • @colinlaird8992
      @colinlaird8992 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@lpeterman not at all merely an observation of facts

    • @lpeterman
      @lpeterman 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@colinlaird8992 Sorry, not buying it.

  • @MrWeedWacky
    @MrWeedWacky 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    350 people, on that small ship. wow

  • @MrZcotty
    @MrZcotty หลายเดือนก่อน

    good grief. liberal educated women and kids.. great archeology..

    • @garethinkster
      @garethinkster หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What on earth are you referring to?

    • @harbourdogNL
      @harbourdogNL หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      As opposed to men who are sad old former public school tossers? And all certainly more of an authority on the topic of shoreline archeology (sic) than you, I allow.

    • @lpeterman
      @lpeterman 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Again, with the misogyny.