Why Marriott, Hilton and Hyatt Don’t Actually Own Most of Their Hotels | WSJ The Economics Of

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 495

  • @wsj
    @wsj  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

    Hyatt is smaller than its hotel chain competitors. So how did it get to be the most expensive? Watch the Economics of Hyatt: on.wsj.com/3xt9yNf
    How did Marriott become the largest hotel chain, with over 30 brands? Marriott’s CFO explains why this is just the beginning for the hospitality giant: on.wsj.com/3xhNqpb

    • @sshanev9956
      @sshanev9956 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jasonk125this seems to be focused on the US market, IHG is a european brand.

  • @DutchBikeGuy
    @DutchBikeGuy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3041

    What a complex way of explaining that many hotels are franchisees.

    • @jimbojimbo6873
      @jimbojimbo6873 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +110

      Its a TH-cam vid they need attention

    • @patrickl131
      @patrickl131 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      That’s what I was thinking

    • @esparda07
      @esparda07 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Can't make a long video with 1 sentence, eh?

    • @ninzki143
      @ninzki143 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      I love being a Hilton Diamond Member.. especially staying at overseas Hilton properties, you get treated like a millionaire lol

    • @homie7218
      @homie7218 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      didn't ask lil bro ​@@ninzki143

  • @katherine7177
    @katherine7177 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +787

    I’ve seen a shift in Marriott hotels where the quality is inconsistent. This makes a lot of sense.

    • @RealShaktimaan
      @RealShaktimaan 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      No it's always been like that. I know plenty of folks who own Marriott and igh hotels. It's nothing new

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Marriott loyalty program is inconsistent, bizarre and unsettling. I don’t like have to debate and argue with mgt. 👎

    • @lazynow1
      @lazynow1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@newagain9964 ah debate and argue with mgt. is fun...then you can insult them....to their face...

    • @aymaanenayetullah6436
      @aymaanenayetullah6436 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      There are certain brand standards owners have to follow in order to operate under a certain name; but yes it does become inconsistent sometimes as some owners care more about operations than others.

    • @MoonV29
      @MoonV29 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Based on the video, you just have to stay at the 5 star level-luxury to have a consistent quality

  • @polarspacebear
    @polarspacebear 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +839

    This is why most hotels are a complete crapshoot on what you get. Very little consistency in physical product, amenities, and especially service. Breakfasts are weaker, housekeeping services reduced, loyalty recognition is greatly minimized. Not saying every chain hotel was perfect before, but ever since the pandemic and the offloading of property by the chains, the service has gone downhill at nearly every hotel I have stayed at.

    • @siewheilou399
      @siewheilou399 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ❓️ Franchise system only existed post pandemic?

    • @ear2thestreet
      @ear2thestreet 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That are exactly my thoughts!

    • @W0Rd0n32sTre3T
      @W0Rd0n32sTre3T 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Yet AirBnB still managed to be worse 😂

    • @condor7810
      @condor7810 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      polarspacebear: As the video notes, Marriott/Hilton made the decision to go "asset-lite" decades ago. The franchised hotel model dates back to the early 1970's...this was not an idea that took hold post pandemic. Your experience is not unlike any business post-pandemic...harder to find staff, etc. Not due to a dramatic shift in who owns the hotel real estate.

    • @polarspacebear
      @polarspacebear 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@siewheilou399 I didn't say that. But they are complementary factors

  • @AgentMrX7
    @AgentMrX7 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +312

    as a former hotel worker. the real loser here is the loyalty customers, it's literally a sign on the front door. that's it. nothing special about the hotel. use your brain, look at all hotels individually and pick what you like for a price you are willing to pay.

    • @sebastian3004
      @sebastian3004 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah but people want to take a selfie in front of that Sign or they want to spit out 'I stayed at Marriott. It was so nice hehe'

    • @Secretlyanothername
      @Secretlyanothername 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The quality has gone way down. I was in a Hilton recently where they were charging $50 per night for a mini-fridge - the same kind of fridge you can get for $120 from Costco, and which used to be supplied in every hotel as standard

    • @OBsurdityTV
      @OBsurdityTV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you have any statistical Analysis of this?

  • @FireEverLiving
    @FireEverLiving 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +634

    It's funny how the CEOs of the hotel companies, who make money from selling their brand, *look* like rich people; while the MCR CEO looks like a used car salesman.

    • @Palaund
      @Palaund 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      He's not the owner of the properties, just the operating partner.

    • @WhatALoadOfTosca
      @WhatALoadOfTosca 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

      @@PalaundDidn’t the video and him say he was the owner of the properties who also operated them? The brand don’t own or operate the hotels.

    • @joshsantiago4397
      @joshsantiago4397 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They want to look presentable. What’s wrong with that?

    • @byroncanty8986
      @byroncanty8986 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      They are pandering to their audience and brand image. You really think the MCR CEO can't afford a suit and nice watch?

    • @EhCloserLook
      @EhCloserLook 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I’m sure those hotel executives are doing just fine.

  • @swankray6319
    @swankray6319 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

    I used Marriott almost exclusively for 17 years of business travel. Now that I'm retired, I've found that IHG is a much better value and the service is much more consistent. Also, as a lifetime Platinum with Marriott, I used to get upgrades quite often pre-COVID but haven't seen one since.

    • @nene5857
      @nene5857 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Platinum level is no longer the highest ranking tier. There is not Titanium and Ambassador, those guest receive priority upgrades over Platinum now.

    • @ssuwandi3240
      @ssuwandi3240 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      SPG was the Top until Marriott bought it. I got 10 years of the most undisputably amazing membership with SPG. Still got the many gifts and SPG "NO BLACKOUT"points. Today that concept is hardly doable.

  • @dcassus
    @dcassus 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +609

    Shoutout to the stock footage of random people at the Berlin-Brandenburg airport.

  • @KregMartok
    @KregMartok 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +298

    When I heard the CFO of Marriott say "we are the largest, 8700 hotels in 139 countries and territories, really showing expertise around the world for what we think hospitality means", I thought this meant, you know, making a nice hotel for guests. Turns out this is left to the franchisees, and what hospitality means to Marriott is figuring out how to charge as much as "the market can bear", and setting up anti-competitive loyalty programs to stop customers from shopping around outside of their flag.

    • @kingderpington6082
      @kingderpington6082 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      While that true, what they also have is data to tell the franchises what attracts customers in terms of what makes a customer happy with their hotel choice, amenities, room layout/style etc.

    • @kevikiru
      @kevikiru 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Anti-competitive. You don't have to join the loyalty program. You can just pay for the hotel you need.

  • @pauliewalnuts240
    @pauliewalnuts240 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +223

    And overtime, the marriot, hilton, etc will slowly go down hill. A fact they acknowledge within this video. When you loose control over quality standardization, it becomes inevitable that the brands reputation looses value as well.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Hard to go downhill when u make up the majority of the market.

    • @MoneyR236
      @MoneyR236 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They have strict QA requirements

    • @mandisaw
      @mandisaw 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Not necessarily. If they go the McD's route, they can impose strict standards & plenty of brand-support (design, suppliers, advice on where/how to locate, etc). The issue is that they are *also* going the Subway route - allowing way too many franchisees in smaller markets, or in close-proximity in larger markets, such that supply exceeds demand. Outsourcing the risk in this way can be good for all parties, but you have to impose some reasonable limits.

    • @MoneyR236
      @MoneyR236 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@mandisaw everything from your second sentence still stands true. They are just trying to sell as many of their brands to owners as much as possible. As long as the hotel is making money off royalties they don’t care. Even if margins are thin for the owner. But yeah if margins are thin for the owner, it’s harder for the owner to keep up with new brand requirements and renovation cycles which require a lot of capital at times.

    • @bbabbbab789
      @bbabbbab789 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      many fastfood brands are franchises too and they onlu go up hill ?

  • @Sololeveler344
    @Sololeveler344 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +103

    I work at a Marriott trust me if your service sucks its because quality of work has been destroyed. We have been reduced to so few workers we cant keep up. They made a new building where i work at . Never hired more people. Trust me it sucks to the extremes. All of our best employees that were diamond left my Marriott and found better jobs and that was in every department btw.

    • @kingderpington6082
      @kingderpington6082 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      that has nothing to do with franchising, Marriott has franchised decades ago.

    • @Sololeveler344
      @Sololeveler344 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@kingderpington6082 this has nothing to do with what im writing

    • @kingderpington6082
      @kingderpington6082 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sololeveler344 you say that while commenting on a video about Marriott franchising their business?

    • @method341
      @method341 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@kingderpington6082he's talking about being understaffed and worked to the bone. Stay in school because you clearly can't read.

  • @Mariakevin-d9v
    @Mariakevin-d9v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +380

    Its worse here, our economy is like a flailing fish, fighting for its life. The normal state of the U.S. economy is actually very bad. Because of this it goes into convulsive spasms fighting to grow any way it can out of desperation. Tricks, gimmicks, rule changes try to stimulate the economy and prevent it from falling but they only bring temporary relief to people since, when you factor in inflation we are declining.

    • @Pamala-p1t
      @Pamala-p1t 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      People believe their currency has the worth it does because they have no other option. Even in a hyperinflationary environment, individuals must continue to use their hyperinflationary currency since they likely have minimal access to other currencies or gold/silver coins.

    • @Davidvictor6
      @Davidvictor6 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Inflation is gradually going to become part of us and due to that fact any money you keep in cash or in a low-interest account declines in value each year. Investing is the only way to make your money grow and unless you have an exceptionally high income, investing is the only way most people will ever have enough money to retire.

    • @Daneilchirs2
      @Daneilchirs2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I've tried investing in the stock market several times but always got discouraged by fluctuations of stock value. I would be happy if you could advise me based on how you went about yours, as I am ready to go the passive income path.!!

    • @Davidvictor6
      @Davidvictor6 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My CFA NICOLE ANASTASIA PLUMLEE a renowned figure in her line of work. I recommend researching her credentials further... She has many years of experience and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market.

    • @Daneilchirs2
      @Daneilchirs2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just ran an online search on her name and came across her websiite; pretty well educated. thank you for sharing.

  • @Csilva857
    @Csilva857 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    We seem to do a whole lot of the asset light business model here in the US. Outsourcing Manufacturing, Uber , Air BNB , Hotel ownership , Franchised Restaurants , Finance , Call centers, health insurance . Capital likes to take the path of least resistance It's no wonder other countries are growing their economies. It's just more financialization here.

    • @neilmckay8649
      @neilmckay8649 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great insight but I don't understand how the impact comes about. Explain please

  • @zt2155
    @zt2155 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +361

    Time for Monopoly to update the game rules. lol

    • @ehochmuephi8219
      @ehochmuephi8219 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Landlordgame² ;)

    • @RudieObias
      @RudieObias 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Capitalism, amiright? 😅

  • @FrancisSiuChock
    @FrancisSiuChock 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    So, who do you think pays for those franchise fees?! Hotel prices have gone up astronomically over the last 5 years and the highest prices hikes are the Brands in this video. This is the same thing happening in Las Vegas with MGM and Caesars where they have sold their properties and are now paid to manage these hotels (again, prices have gone through the roof!).

    • @Dividendflywheel
      @Dividendflywheel 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      With regards to Vegas VICI properties is the biggest casino landlord. 😊They own the buildings and MGM and others (casino operators) are tenants. Imagine being the landlord to the casino business. It’s an ingeniously profitable business model. Blackstone is getting in on the game too.
      With regards to Marriott, take a look at it’s stock performance.. These businesses are built for the shareholders so deploy your capital appropriately

  • @bhupindertube
    @bhupindertube 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Now I know which day to book - Sunday. Thanks for the tip.

    • @Trainsallday
      @Trainsallday 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The only real takeaway. Weird to me because I always see Sunday as the most expensive hotel day

    • @bhupindertube
      @bhupindertube 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Trainsallday Yes, it was weird to me to. But the logic is that both the leisure & business people opt out on Sundays.

  • @ycabonifacio
    @ycabonifacio 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    stumbled upon this on my recommendations, and i am impressed! i think it's common to choose a hotel you are more familiar with, especially with the trust people have if the hotel has a "by x company" because you can be in the other side of the world and can trust properties that are labeled as "by marriot, by wyndham, by hyatt," and the like

  • @JC-kb2qg
    @JC-kb2qg 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +100

    Marriott sucks these days. They are all the same econo box hotels below a certain category

    • @mack-uv6gn
      @mack-uv6gn 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂

    • @RudieObias
      @RudieObias 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I guess you never visit Marriott's high end luxury hotels 😅

    • @rehoboth_farm
      @rehoboth_farm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They figured out how to ruin their brand while turning their business into nothing but a brand. Put a Marriott sticker on a Motel 6. Nobody can afford to travel anymore anyway.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Marriott provides the most overpriced rooms and bizzare and mediocre loyalty program.

    • @rickrandall3174
      @rickrandall3174 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Their post-COVID policy of only cleaning rooms once every 2 days "to protect the environment" is quite irritating.

  • @Kipptz
    @Kipptz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Having worked at a hotel I can also say that the owners of hotels also hire a management company typically to staff their hotel and run it for a percentage of the revenue/profit. And a lot of times if you get awful experiences it might not be the people at those hotels but rather the terrible management and lack of or micromanaging oversight and scrutiny you’re under. The hotel industry is tough in its own way and it’s not very kind. I came from one with awful management and they were kept because the books looked good despite the work morale and culture being diminished because the management company covered it all up.

  • @jackiemasek8302
    @jackiemasek8302 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Not only are most hotels a franchise but there are also management companies that the employees of those hotels actually work for and not the franchisee or the main name hotel.

  • @justalilred
    @justalilred 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I work for a best western but it's operated by a group the manages the employees of a Hilton, best Western and a holiday inn, all within 5 miles of each other

    • @bonaface
      @bonaface 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and watch youtube content about marriott and hyatt?? get a life my guy!

  • @23zchris
    @23zchris 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I didn't expect the hotels have such level of complexity in their business model. Maybe you can feature the nature US hospital businesses too.

  • @alphaTrader.oo1
    @alphaTrader.oo1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    I don't look at brand nowadays
    reviews are more accurate

  • @teasy2518
    @teasy2518 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    @wsj Here's another intriguing story worth exploring: Service Properties Trust (SVC), which you briefly highlighted. Amid the pandemic, they recognized the cost efficiency of operating under their own flag (Sonesta hotels) and not partnering with brands or other operators. Consequently, they terminated contracts with major players such as Marriott, Hilton, IHG, and Hyatt, effectively reshaping their company virtually overnight.

    • @piphastings6734
      @piphastings6734 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Great point....all of a sudden, I saw this name "Sonesta" in the past couple of years pop up.

    • @teasy2518
      @teasy2518 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@piphastings6734 Right! An entire hotel brand born out of a company taking advantage of the pandemic to get out of contracts with the major operators. SVC required minimium income targets to be met and of course - no one was staying at hotels during the pandemic so the brands could not afford to pay these costs and thus were in breach of contract. Hope WSJ picks this up!

  • @TheeStrawberryLee
    @TheeStrawberryLee 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    This is gooooood! I love these kinds of informative videos WSJ!!!

    • @maxjb9941
      @maxjb9941 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      you didnt know this? LOL

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maxjb9941Americans don’t really know much…except falsities.

  • @carlaalegria3658
    @carlaalegria3658 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As someone who works for Hyatt, I can tell franchise hotels decrease the quality of the standars and the way employees are managed, as long as you can pay the franchise fee corporate doesn't really care.

  • @peoplevrobot
    @peoplevrobot 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Good job WSJ!! Great storytelling and very informative.

  • @Dudevegaslv
    @Dudevegaslv 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    They are playing the McDonald’s play book!

    • @karanpatel8910
      @karanpatel8910 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really

    • @wadexyz
      @wadexyz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      McDonald's owns about 70% of the buildings and 45% of the land at its locations worldwide. So quite a bit different.

  • @jimmymifsud1
    @jimmymifsud1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hilton, Hyatt and Marriott don’t mean much in Australia.
    However Accor is massive here, but the membership systems work as we only book Accor hotels.

  • @TheChangNetwork
    @TheChangNetwork 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    Hilton is just basically airBNB.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      All of them are. Except we hope they have a higher quality standard. Hope is the key word

    • @sefer-nv6cn
      @sefer-nv6cn 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They probably do in most parts of the world outside the US.

    • @GameFuMaster
      @GameFuMaster 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@newagain9964 well generally they also don't come with surprise cleaning fees or whatever when displaying prices

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@GameFuMaster true. And Hilton/a decent hotel chain’s customer care is 80% better than airBnB’s. Not higher simply because some hotel owners just DGA F.

  • @johnlittle8267
    @johnlittle8267 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Wyndham is much larger than Hyatt, but I guess they could get Hyatt to talk on camera. Nice video and information!

    • @thediversion77
      @thediversion77 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      True, but Hyatt makes more than 4x more revenue than Wyndham at a much smaller scale.
      It's all relative, sort of like the airline industry.. Southwest airlines flies more passengers per year than United but United makes more money per year.

  • @TravelingGonad
    @TravelingGonad 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's why hotel reviews are more important than ever.

  • @mattbosley3531
    @mattbosley3531 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's just like restaurants, franchises. Everyone's doing it. Some retail chains do it as well.

  • @williamcarter3933
    @williamcarter3933 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    That woman has joined the Night King!

    • @RAJohnson713
      @RAJohnson713 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      for real lol

    • @goodpropltd8382
      @goodpropltd8382 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bro her eyes are crazy! she's definitely been beyond the wall @@RAJohnson713

    • @justayoutuber1906
      @justayoutuber1906 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or Diary of a Vampire

  • @MrJordanFry
    @MrJordanFry 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a former EDITION Abu Dhabi employee… they 100% are franchised out. To the point they tried to deflag Dubai EDITION opening night due to conflict with ownership… ownership won

  • @corner559
    @corner559 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hotels across brands have become too inconsistent, especially in North America. And it's unacceptable that many in the US are still serving room service in boxes which came about because of the pandemic and not returning to full tray service. It's these owners trying to squeeze every last dollar they can out of their properties.

  • @goeglenoegle
    @goeglenoegle 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just to make this clear (the video seems to suggest otherwise towards the end): the hotel industry is highly fragmented. Most hotels are small! Even Marriott as the biggest chain only holds a relatively percentage of market share world-wide: “Based on lodging industry data, we have an approximately 16 percent share of the U.S. hotel market and a four percent share of the hotel market outside the U.S. (based on number of rooms).“ (from their 2023 annual report)

  • @dcniemi5025
    @dcniemi5025 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unstated here is those employees don't work for the big brands meaning they don't get those benefits, nor the discounts that they'd normally get. Human capital expenditures drop considerably, but so do the benefit for staff.

  • @johnl.7754
    @johnl.7754 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Wonder if hotel brands points business now is worth more than the hotels business (just like Airlines and their miles)?

  • @haepisaus
    @haepisaus 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hotel franchises put their reputation on the line while the actual hotel operator just laughs in the face of guests complaining about their falling quality and standards. This is the kind of business model that will make these premium brand slowly lose its association with luxury.

  • @Woodshadow
    @Woodshadow 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I book Marriott because I have status though my Amex and I book them consistently for work so I can use the rewards when I am on vacation. it all checks out

  • @Ratoo
    @Ratoo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    How about enforce property owners to respect brand guidelines, and elite benefits, instead of letting them run away without any repercussion? If you treat yourself as a glorified OTA, then us customers act like so. I only go out of my way to stay at Hyatt. Marriott and Hilton don’t get my loyalty.

    • @TransConBrilliance
      @TransConBrilliance 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because the hotel can just switch brands with little business interruption. It's like amex demanding target to have lower prices if they want to accept amex cards. How well is that going to be received.

  • @IseiNabuka
    @IseiNabuka 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yep Marriott is winning big on Hotels branding in the South Pacific and bought hotels previously owned by Starwood Hotels and Resorts, when JW Marriott bought the brand back in 2016.

  • @sterlingmichel4445
    @sterlingmichel4445 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm really loving this new peveat the WSJ is doing to other topics beside crazy politic, and cancel culture stuff.

  • @ACC-2929
    @ACC-2929 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Recently at a TX doubletree Hilton a little 12 year old died in the pool bc of an exposed pipe… this explains why the mom couldn’t sue the actual Hilton company… such a sad story of something that could’ve been prevented… and just sucks that this is how they work. I’ve noticed a decline in some of the chains we frequent for vacation.

  • @Dereyter
    @Dereyter 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Orlando is a great example. The most remarkable Peabody hotel on International drive was sold to Hyatt. I miss that style

  • @onlineshoppingjakarta7338
    @onlineshoppingjakarta7338 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Gouge pricing

    • @architecture.w
      @architecture.w 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dynamic pricing.

  • @shanenolan085
    @shanenolan085 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    4:18 i honestly travel TO destinations on Sundays 💯💯😩😩😩 i noticed flights and hotels are waaaaay cheaper on those days and i like that 😩

  • @pjacobsen1000
    @pjacobsen1000 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great explainer video! I guess the hotel industry has learned from the fast food industry. What industry will follow this path next? Air travel? You operate a B737 and you get to slap a 'Singapore Airlines' on the side, if you manage it well.

    • @and1513
      @and1513 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is already sort of a thing. Some airlines don't own their aircraft, they lease them from a 3rd party.

  • @katherinelangford981
    @katherinelangford981 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This explains why the same chain, say Ramadas, from one hotel to the other can vary greatly in quality, amenities, pricing, etc. Why one location I think was lovely, I book at another and it's a dive.
    I have to figure out how to spot this stuff and get good ones, because price isn't it, and reviews from when I book to when I stay can change greatly. Plus I think they sometimes leave up old pics that make it look better than it is.

  • @abhishekvanenooru2869
    @abhishekvanenooru2869 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    the code that dynamically sets the prices in platform according to the demand amazes me

    • @Dayvit78
      @Dayvit78 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's a basic math function. How many rooms are left - up the price when there are fewer.

  • @NixMatti
    @NixMatti 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yes thats why you stay at independant small business owners not these big corporate brands

  • @Definemyluck
    @Definemyluck 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    MCR is a car wreck - I stayed in one of their properties for 3 years and I question how they are still in business

  • @samuraijack1371
    @samuraijack1371 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Calling packet rolled oats and skim milk as break fast is just ridiculous

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or you’ll be fortunate enough to get $10 breakfast credit at restaurant. Marriott 😑. Where coffee is $7. A muffin is $5

  • @ricardoenrique9876
    @ricardoenrique9876 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What an interesting video, quality content.

  • @stevenlee4407
    @stevenlee4407 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant illustration of the wealth transfer upward of the 1%, as hotel brands move to focus purely on profit generation and pass all risk down to independent operators who pay to have access to the global network and owners that shoulder all risk of construction and development

  • @DannerBanks
    @DannerBanks 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    So they are franchises basically?

    • @robertewalt7789
      @robertewalt7789 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The franchise restaurant chains, eg McDonalds, require a local business person to own (or lease) the property, and operate the business.

    • @johnyossarian9059
      @johnyossarian9059 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      And the brands don't own or operate the properties. They're just selling their flags for a cut of the revenue. Isn't that basically a franchise?
      Or am I getting the whole video wrong?

    • @wollinger
      @wollinger 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      No. There are owned, managed and franchise hotels carrying those flags.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Basically, yes.

    • @nene5857
      @nene5857 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes it is precisely a franchised hotel.

  • @sonofsandwiches6892
    @sonofsandwiches6892 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And this is why a privately owned "boutique" hotel is a better option in most cases. Marriott is quickly becoming the McDonalds of hotels.

  • @sachaparro711
    @sachaparro711 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic way to use analytics 📈

  • @teddy90636
    @teddy90636 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I doubt they feel threatened by franchises flying their hotels under different banners. This is because most of Marriot's portfolio is specifically themed and stylized. Which would make it harder for franchisees to switch sides.

  • @eliubfj
    @eliubfj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    very informative, thanks!

  • @juanday9618
    @juanday9618 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very informative, very humble, keep up the awesome videos. I will follow you ,I liked this trading nice very good very interesting

  • @Chertoff88
    @Chertoff88 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow, the wall street journal actually doing some journalism for once.

  • @freedomlife3623
    @freedomlife3623 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for explaining the reason behind my experience ( not a good one) in different Marriott. Believe Fairmont still manages property they put their name on, Fairmont Gold is my choice to stay, for now.

  • @TransConBrilliance
    @TransConBrilliance 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This makes a lot of sense now as to why even elite member service at Marriott is so awful and so incredibly awful at specific regions. Clearly, Marriott don't care enough to make sure their most loyal customers aren't getting shafted by not getting the benefits that they are supposed to. And this explains why so many specific hotels can get away with not offering breakfast to elite members or room upgrades. 2 prime reasons to even achieve platinum and up at Marriott. The worst part is that the 3 big chains appears to be colluding in prices in big cities like paris, London. They would just raise prices together and sometimes dynamically with the dollar. Meanwhile if you look at expedia for prices outside of those 3 you'll notice significantly lower prices. While I'll still retain my Hilton business I'm dropping Marriott permanently because I doubt anything will change with them in the next 5 years.

    • @erebuxy
      @erebuxy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is caused by a different issue. In US, nearly EVERYONE is an elite member, even gold is super common. They are so easy to get through Marriott credit cards. If you want to get room upgrades and special perks, you need to have higher tiers than most people (which is at least Platinum to Titanium in US). Elite member carries more value outside US.
      As for London, the price is probably driven up by frequent business travelers. Because free points and free elite status. Why not!

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@erebuxynot only are u conflating the issues, but ur blaming the customer for the problem created by the (greedy and sleazy) seller. 🥱🙄

  • @jordancoleman94
    @jordancoleman94 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thus, the service portion for Marriott is inconsistent especially depending on the management companies that run the day by day.

  • @rehoboth_farm
    @rehoboth_farm 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you for letting us know that hotel stocks are worthless.

    • @dieselgoinham
      @dieselgoinham 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Quite the opposite.

    • @TransConBrilliance
      @TransConBrilliance 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wrong. If you look at Marriott and Hilton stocks they weathered the post pandemic market better than almost every sector. The way they made it sound during covid you would think their business was doomed but in fact I suspect they used that to cut a lot of cost at customers expense and why they both have had such good earnings.

  • @nainasoni6550
    @nainasoni6550 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    U explain very well

  • @samgriffith8086
    @samgriffith8086 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Some similarities to car dealerships economics. But still vastly different

  • @SDFNI3894YR
    @SDFNI3894YR 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    idk why some ppl are saying this vid is complicated. to me, it was simple n linear.

  • @some______guy
    @some______guy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Well, that's the most attractive journalist I've ever seen.

    • @wollinger
      @wollinger 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Simp

  • @uumuu
    @uumuu 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    15 years ago Marriot was a high end name that I couldn't afford to stay at, now I'd rather pass on it in favor of nicer or better value places.

  • @ebifurai.163
    @ebifurai.163 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This model does bring a lot of profit, but it only works because those big "hotel flags" are already established in the industry for a long time. They already have the data and experience for maximizing hotel performance, and they sell those data to the franchisees for a fee.
    This model indirectly hampers the growth of independent hotels and leaving the hotel industry to be monopolized by few players.

  • @beatlejeff65
    @beatlejeff65 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I noticed after the pandemic that every component of the travel industry - hotels, airlines, rental cars - had all jacked their rates in an obvious attempt to make up for revenues lost during the shutdown. But the pandemic ended three years ago, and in that time, airfare and car rental rates have moderated and come back down to reasonable amounts. Hotels have not. Rooms at the major hotel companies that should only be around $100 per night are still nearly double that. It takes some effort to plan travel now. It is possible to find reasonable rates at an outlet of the major brands, though it may mean staying further away from where I really want to be in order to keep the cost down. Either that, or booking at a lower quality hotel chain, something I'm not willing to do.

  • @SorminaESar
    @SorminaESar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In fact that many hotels are so difficult to bring the customers to enjoy the living of hotel. Hyatt isn't cheap hotel, luxury hotel

  • @mack-uv6gn
    @mack-uv6gn 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Dynamic pricing 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @ThriftyCHNR
      @ThriftyCHNR 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      dystopia

    • @RudieObias
      @RudieObias 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's Capitalism.

    • @MatthewCasey
      @MatthewCasey 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The absolute bane of the common person. Imagine getting a fair price or a good deal from a business with a full-time revenue manager and algorithms to outsmart you.

    • @TransConBrilliance
      @TransConBrilliance 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They know the average American is not going to do the work of finding the best price, read the fine print and do their homework more than one sitting in from of the computer. I literally spend 2 months monitoring hotel room prices in order to get an idea of the price ranges including point conversions. Who wants to do that and that's just 1 hotel.

    • @d.b.cooper1
      @d.b.cooper1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Even gave Taylor Swift a shoutout for driving crazy prices. Most 2024 thing ever along with the grotesque tech driven drive of 'dynamic pricing' which more often than not isn't simply a demand & supply equation.

  • @MarcyBiele
    @MarcyBiele 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    always find your lessons very practical and applicable. Thank you for making trading so accessible!

  • @Puzekat2
    @Puzekat2 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does Marriott not being known by Marriott affect the customer? Reduction of quality. Lack of ability for the customer to know who is responsible for the property.

  • @DreLBrown529
    @DreLBrown529 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I guess Hilton owns a much higher percentage of their hotels since they weren’t listed with Marriott and Hyatt as owning only 1 to 2 percent of their hotels.

    • @TransConBrilliance
      @TransConBrilliance 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That's what I think too and the reason why my room upgrade chances with Hilton is 80% and with Marriott it's more like 30%. Except San Diego areas where both of them are 0% in the last 7 years and I go there often.

    • @minhdo2631
      @minhdo2631 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m a Hilton Loyalist

  • @m.fazlurrahman5854
    @m.fazlurrahman5854 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And that comes with extremely poor reviews by the hotelier magazine with all aspects of the “Hospice” metrics going down in the opposite direction. The question is WHY it is in practice still? Choose the right answer:
    1) easier to get-out.
    2) rooms for not having an extensive health coverage.
    3) Encourage Local beauty pageants!!

  • @mktmtu1291
    @mktmtu1291 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good insight

  • @sachaparro711
    @sachaparro711 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Insightful

  • @pibob7880
    @pibob7880 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ok this makes sense, lower end hotels are not even necessary at attractive real estate locations.
    Why not rent your brand for those and concentrate your resources and management skills on the upper scale where the real money is

  • @FGH9G
    @FGH9G 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just hope that this industry consolidation doesn't lead to consumer price gouging and getting nickel and dimed left and right, like what usually happens with corporate monopolies!

  • @thomascuvillier7250
    @thomascuvillier7250 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If people were more aware of this it would kill the brand name tho

  • @AndreaDoesYoga
    @AndreaDoesYoga 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Intriguing business model, didn't know this before! 😮

  • @shivanithapliyal7518
    @shivanithapliyal7518 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    knew this from Business wars podcast :)

  • @edr.2642
    @edr.2642 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Easy money for Hotel operators. Cleaning expense is like $5 per day. Smh. Utilities and supplies another $5. They charge $300 per night is crazy.

  • @jrimmer4987
    @jrimmer4987 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    very informative

  • @EcomCarl
    @EcomCarl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The franchising strategy adopted by Marriott and others is a brilliant move that has drastically scaled their growth while minimizing risk. This model showcases how brands can leverage their reputation and systems to ensure profitability and brand consistency without the direct costs of property management.

  • @eyesurgeon69
    @eyesurgeon69 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Bottom line, Marriott has sold out their control of quality and good customer experience for fast growth. Short term return for investors, who cares about our reputation if it doesn't affect the stock price this quarter.

    • @Dividendflywheel
      @Dividendflywheel 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are correct Marriott stock has beat the S&P 500 going back to its IPO in 1998

  • @brucehicks5817
    @brucehicks5817 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This has been the Four Seasons model for decades.

  • @jessieanderson3931
    @jessieanderson3931 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The member benefits have become increasingly diluted.

  • @p3arworld
    @p3arworld 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    THIS is why basically every hotel feels like a 2-star experience. Unless you will pay $600+ a night at a 5-star hotelt, you are going to get the 2-star "franchise" experience smh. And it is still not cheap!

  • @xxxx-tb4de
    @xxxx-tb4de 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It is always demand/supply. People should stop staying in hotels which does NOT provide value for their money.

  • @mrdr89
    @mrdr89 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How does Wyndham compare? I seem to see a lot of their hotels now

  • @jordanhughes7966
    @jordanhughes7966 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Basically you pay for the brand, services are not included

  • @ScalperSpecltr
    @ScalperSpecltr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hotels lately suck! They all worry about saving a buck, that the quality has sugfered! Id rather stay at independent hotel than a brand name if the service and quality are there. I think its time to start a hotel brand

  • @wesjimez2941
    @wesjimez2941 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's because they see a huge market crash and rising interest rates don't help.

  • @nene5857
    @nene5857 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes and your product has suffered because of it! I’ve stayed at Marriott hotels that were on par with Days Inn. It’s very inconsistent and very telling.