Why Marriott, Hilton and Hyatt Don’t Actually Own Most of Their Hotels | WSJ The Economics Of

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 พ.ค. 2024
  • When guests stay at a hotel chain like Marriott, Hilton or Hyatt, these companies don’t typically own the property. They may not even run it. So what is happening in the hotel industry and what benefits are smaller companies receiving from these “flags” in the industry?
    WSJ explains why hotel companies like Marriott and Hilton actually own less than 1% of their properties and why hotel owners like MCR Hotels choose to fly a flag or go independent.
    Chapters:
    0:00 The hotel industry
    1:30 Franchise model
    2:47 Pricing hotel rooms
    4:28 Loyalty programs
    5:25 Independent hotels and branding
    The Economics Of
    How do the world's most successful companies generate revenue? In this explainer series, we'll dive into the surprising stories behind how businesses work--exploring everything from Costco's "treasure-hunt" model to the economics behind Amazon's AWS.
    Hyatt is smaller than its hotel chain competitors. So how did it get to be the most expensive? Watch the Economics of Hyatt: on.wsj.com/3PLS0T6
    How did Marriott become the largest hotel chain, with over 30 brands? Marriott’s CFO explains why this is just the beginning for the hospitality giant: on.wsj.com/4aFZFds
    #Travel #Hotels #WSJ

ความคิดเห็น • 391

  • @wsj
    @wsj  หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    Hyatt is smaller than its hotel chain competitors. So how did it get to be the most expensive? Watch the Economics of Hyatt: on.wsj.com/3xt9yNf
    How did Marriott become the largest hotel chain, with over 30 brands? Marriott’s CFO explains why this is just the beginning for the hospitality giant: on.wsj.com/3xhNqpb

    • @jasonk125
      @jasonk125 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Why no mention of IHG? How do they stack up? What is their model?

    • @shailenverma959
      @shailenverma959 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jasonk125this seems to be focused on the US market, IHG is a european brand.

  • @DutchBikeGuy
    @DutchBikeGuy 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1893

    What a complex way of explaining that many hotels are franchisees.

    • @jimbojimbo6873
      @jimbojimbo6873 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +60

      Its a TH-cam vid they need attention

    • @patrickl131
      @patrickl131 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +12

      That’s what I was thinking

    • @esparda07
      @esparda07 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +19

      Can't make a long video with 1 sentence, eh?

    • @ninzki143
      @ninzki143 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      I love being a Hilton Diamond Member.. especially staying at overseas Hilton properties, you get treated like a millionaire lol

    • @homie7218
      @homie7218 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      didn't ask lil bro ​@@ninzki143

  • @katherine7177
    @katherine7177 หลายเดือนก่อน +480

    I’ve seen a shift in Marriott hotels where the quality is inconsistent. This makes a lot of sense.

    • @RealShaktimaan
      @RealShaktimaan หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      No it's always been like that. I know plenty of folks who own Marriott and igh hotels. It's nothing new

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Marriott loyalty program is inconsistent, bizarre and unsettling. I don’t like have to debate and argue with mgt. 👎

    • @lazynow1
      @lazynow1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@newagain9964 ah debate and argue with mgt. is fun...then you can insult them....to their face...

  • @user-br7yv5hh3j
    @user-br7yv5hh3j 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +155

    When I heard the CFO of Marriott say "we are the largest, 8700 hotels in 139 countries and territories, really showing expertise around the world for what we think hospitality means", I thought this meant, you know, making a nice hotel for guests. Turns out this is left to the franchisees, and what hospitality means to Marriott is figuring out how to charge as much as "the market can bear", and setting up anti-competitive loyalty programs to stop customers from shopping around outside of their flag.

    • @kingderpington6082
      @kingderpington6082 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      While that true, what they also have is data to tell the franchises what attracts customers in terms of what makes a customer happy with their hotel choice, amenities, room layout/style etc.

  • @FireEverLiving
    @FireEverLiving หลายเดือนก่อน +382

    It's funny how the CEOs of the hotel companies, who make money from selling their brand, *look* like rich people; while the MCR CEO looks like a used car salesman.

    • @Palaund
      @Palaund 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      He's not the owner of the properties, just the operating partner.

    • @WhatALoadOfTosca
      @WhatALoadOfTosca 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +22

      @@PalaundDidn’t the video and him say he was the owner of the properties who also operated them? The brand don’t own or operate the hotels.

    • @joshsantiago4397
      @joshsantiago4397 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They want to look presentable. What’s wrong with that?

    • @byroncanty8986
      @byroncanty8986 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      They are pandering to their audience and brand image. You really think the MCR CEO can't afford a suit and nice watch?

    • @EhCloserLook
      @EhCloserLook 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I’m sure those hotel executives are doing just fine.

  • @dcassus
    @dcassus หลายเดือนก่อน +492

    Shoutout to the stock footage of random people at the Berlin-Brandenburg airport.

  • @polarspacebear
    @polarspacebear หลายเดือนก่อน +692

    This is why most hotels are a complete crapshoot on what you get. Very little consistency in physical product, amenities, and especially service. Breakfasts are weaker, housekeeping services reduced, loyalty recognition is greatly minimized. Not saying every chain hotel was perfect before, but ever since the pandemic and the offloading of property by the chains, the service has gone downhill at nearly every hotel I have stayed at.

    • @siewheilou399
      @siewheilou399 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      ❓️ Franchise system only existed post pandemic?

    • @ear2thestreet
      @ear2thestreet หลายเดือนก่อน

      That are exactly my thoughts!

    • @W0Rd0n32sTre3T
      @W0Rd0n32sTre3T หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Yet AirBnB still managed to be worse 😂

    • @condor7810
      @condor7810 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      polarspacebear: As the video notes, Marriott/Hilton made the decision to go "asset-lite" decades ago. The franchised hotel model dates back to the early 1970's...this was not an idea that took hold post pandemic. Your experience is not unlike any business post-pandemic...harder to find staff, etc. Not due to a dramatic shift in who owns the hotel real estate.

    • @polarspacebear
      @polarspacebear หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@siewheilou399 I didn't say that. But they are complementary factors

  • @AgentMrX7
    @AgentMrX7 หลายเดือนก่อน +173

    as a former hotel worker. the real loser here is the loyalty customers, it's literally a sign on the front door. that's it. nothing special about the hotel. use your brain, look at all hotels individually and pick what you like for a price you are willing to pay.

    • @sebastian3004
      @sebastian3004 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yeah but people want to take a selfie in front of that Sign or they want to spit out 'I stayed at Marriott. It was so nice hehe'

  • @pauliewalnuts240
    @pauliewalnuts240 หลายเดือนก่อน +148

    And overtime, the marriot, hilton, etc will slowly go down hill. A fact they acknowledge within this video. When you loose control over quality standardization, it becomes inevitable that the brands reputation looses value as well.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Hard to go downhill when u make up the majority of the market.

    • @MoneyR236
      @MoneyR236 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      They have strict QA requirements

    • @mandisaw
      @mandisaw 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

      Not necessarily. If they go the McD's route, they can impose strict standards & plenty of brand-support (design, suppliers, advice on where/how to locate, etc). The issue is that they are *also* going the Subway route - allowing way too many franchisees in smaller markets, or in close-proximity in larger markets, such that supply exceeds demand. Outsourcing the risk in this way can be good for all parties, but you have to impose some reasonable limits.

    • @MoneyR236
      @MoneyR236 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

      @@mandisaw everything from your second sentence still stands true. They are just trying to sell as many of their brands to owners as much as possible. As long as the hotel is making money off royalties they don’t care. Even if margins are thin for the owner. But yeah if margins are thin for the owner, it’s harder for the owner to keep up with new brand requirements and renovation cycles which require a lot of capital at times.

  • @swankray6319
    @swankray6319 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

    I used Marriott almost exclusively for 17 years of business travel. Now that I'm retired, I've found that IHG is a much better value and the service is much more consistent. Also, as a lifetime Platinum with Marriott, I used to get upgrades quite often pre-COVID but haven't seen one since.

    • @nene5857
      @nene5857 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      Platinum level is no longer the highest ranking tier. There is not Titanium and Ambassador, those guest receive priority upgrades over Platinum now.

    • @ssuwandi3240
      @ssuwandi3240 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

      SPG was the Top until Marriott bought it. I got 10 years of the most undisputably amazing membership with SPG. Still got the many gifts and SPG "NO BLACKOUT"points. Today that concept is hardly doable.

  • @Sololeveler344
    @Sololeveler344 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    I work at a Marriott trust me if your service sucks its because quality of work has been destroyed. We have been reduced to so few workers we cant keep up. They made a new building where i work at . Never hired more people. Trust me it sucks to the extremes. All of our best employees that were diamond left my Marriott and found better jobs and that was in every department btw.

    • @kingderpington6082
      @kingderpington6082 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      that has nothing to do with franchising, Marriott has franchised decades ago.

    • @Sololeveler344
      @Sololeveler344 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@kingderpington6082 this has nothing to do with what im writing

    • @kingderpington6082
      @kingderpington6082 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Sololeveler344 you say that while commenting on a video about Marriott franchising their business?

  • @zt2155
    @zt2155 หลายเดือนก่อน +314

    Time for Monopoly to update the game rules. lol

    • @ehochmuephi8219
      @ehochmuephi8219 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Landlordgame² ;)

    • @RudieObias
      @RudieObias หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Capitalism, amiright? 😅

  • @Csilva857
    @Csilva857 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    We seem to do a whole lot of the asset light business model here in the US. Outsourcing Manufacturing, Uber , Air BNB , Hotel ownership , Franchised Restaurants , Finance , Call centers, health insurance . Capital likes to take the path of least resistance It's no wonder other countries are growing their economies. It's just more financialization here.

    • @neilmckay8649
      @neilmckay8649 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Great insight but I don't understand how the impact comes about. Explain please

  • @FrancisSiuChock
    @FrancisSiuChock หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    So, who do you think pays for those franchise fees?! Hotel prices have gone up astronomically over the last 5 years and the highest prices hikes are the Brands in this video. This is the same thing happening in Las Vegas with MGM and Caesars where they have sold their properties and are now paid to manage these hotels (again, prices have gone through the roof!).

    • @Dividendflywheel
      @Dividendflywheel 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      With regards to Vegas VICI properties is the biggest casino landlord. 😊They own the buildings and MGM and others (casino operators) are tenants. Imagine being the landlord to the casino business. It’s an ingeniously profitable business model. Blackstone is getting in on the game too.
      With regards to Marriott, take a look at it’s stock performance.. These businesses are built for the shareholders so deploy your capital appropriately

  • @peoplevrobot
    @peoplevrobot 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Good job WSJ!! Great storytelling and very informative.

  • @shanenolan085
    @shanenolan085 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    4:18 i honestly travel TO destinations on Sundays 💯💯😩😩😩 i noticed flights and hotels are waaaaay cheaper on those days and i like that 😩

  • @23zchris
    @23zchris หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I didn't expect the hotels have such level of complexity in their business model. Maybe you can feature the nature US hospital businesses too.

  • @bhupindertube
    @bhupindertube หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Now I know which day to book - Sunday. Thanks for the tip.

    • @Trainsallday
      @Trainsallday 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      The only real takeaway. Weird to me because I always see Sunday as the most expensive hotel day

    • @bhupindertube
      @bhupindertube 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@Trainsallday Yes, it was weird to me to. But the logic is that both the leisure & business people opt out on Sundays.

  • @eliubfj
    @eliubfj 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    very informative, thanks!

  • @ycabonifacio2441
    @ycabonifacio2441 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    stumbled upon this on my recommendations, and i am impressed! i think it's common to choose a hotel you are more familiar with, especially with the trust people have if the hotel has a "by x company" because you can be in the other side of the world and can trust properties that are labeled as "by marriot, by wyndham, by hyatt," and the like

  • @JC-kb2qg
    @JC-kb2qg หลายเดือนก่อน +93

    Marriott sucks these days. They are all the same econo box hotels below a certain category

    • @mack-uv6gn
      @mack-uv6gn หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂

    • @RudieObias
      @RudieObias หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I guess you never visit Marriott's high end luxury hotels 😅

    • @rehoboth_farm
      @rehoboth_farm หลายเดือนก่อน

      They figured out how to ruin their brand while turning their business into nothing but a brand. Put a Marriott sticker on a Motel 6. Nobody can afford to travel anymore anyway.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Marriott provides the most overpriced rooms and bizzare and mediocre loyalty program.

    • @rickrandall3174
      @rickrandall3174 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Their post-COVID policy of only cleaning rooms once every 2 days "to protect the environment" is quite irritating.

  • @justalilred
    @justalilred หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I work for a best western but it's operated by a group the manages the employees of a Hilton, best Western and a holiday inn, all within 5 miles of each other

    • @bonaface
      @bonaface หลายเดือนก่อน

      and watch youtube content about marriott and hyatt?? get a life my guy!

  • @jrimmer4987
    @jrimmer4987 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very informative

  • @Kipptz
    @Kipptz 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Having worked at a hotel I can also say that the owners of hotels also hire a management company typically to staff their hotel and run it for a percentage of the revenue/profit. And a lot of times if you get awful experiences it might not be the people at those hotels but rather the terrible management and lack of or micromanaging oversight and scrutiny you’re under. The hotel industry is tough in its own way and it’s not very kind. I came from one with awful management and they were kept because the books looked good despite the work morale and culture being diminished because the management company covered it all up.

  • @EcomCarl
    @EcomCarl 13 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The franchising strategy adopted by Marriott and others is a brilliant move that has drastically scaled their growth while minimizing risk. This model showcases how brands can leverage their reputation and systems to ensure profitability and brand consistency without the direct costs of property management.

  • @teasy2518
    @teasy2518 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    @wsj Here's another intriguing story worth exploring: Service Properties Trust (SVC), which you briefly highlighted. Amid the pandemic, they recognized the cost efficiency of operating under their own flag (Sonesta hotels) and not partnering with brands or other operators. Consequently, they terminated contracts with major players such as Marriott, Hilton, IHG, and Hyatt, effectively reshaping their company virtually overnight.

    • @piphastings6734
      @piphastings6734 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Great point....all of a sudden, I saw this name "Sonesta" in the past couple of years pop up.

    • @teasy2518
      @teasy2518 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@piphastings6734 Right! An entire hotel brand born out of a company taking advantage of the pandemic to get out of contracts with the major operators. SVC required minimium income targets to be met and of course - no one was staying at hotels during the pandemic so the brands could not afford to pay these costs and thus were in breach of contract. Hope WSJ picks this up!

  • @jimmymifsud1
    @jimmymifsud1 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Hilton, Hyatt and Marriott don’t mean much in Australia.
    However Accor is massive here, but the membership systems work as we only book Accor hotels.

  • @TheeStrawberryLee
    @TheeStrawberryLee หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    This is gooooood! I love these kinds of informative videos WSJ!!!

    • @maxjb9941
      @maxjb9941 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      you didnt know this? LOL

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@maxjb9941Americans don’t really know much…except falsities.

  • @ricardoenrique9876
    @ricardoenrique9876 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What an interesting video, quality content.

  • @TheChangNetwork
    @TheChangNetwork หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    Hilton is just basically airBNB.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      All of them are. Except we hope they have a higher quality standard. Hope is the key word

    • @sefer-nv6cn
      @sefer-nv6cn 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They probably do in most parts of the world outside the US.

    • @GameFuMaster
      @GameFuMaster 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@newagain9964 well generally they also don't come with surprise cleaning fees or whatever when displaying prices

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      @@GameFuMaster true. And Hilton/a decent hotel chain’s customer care is 80% better than airBnB’s. Not higher simply because some hotel owners just DGA F.

  • @johnl.7754
    @johnl.7754 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Wonder if hotel brands points business now is worth more than the hotels business (just like Airlines and their miles)?

  • @Woodshadow
    @Woodshadow หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I book Marriott because I have status though my Amex and I book them consistently for work so I can use the rewards when I am on vacation. it all checks out

  • @mack-uv6gn
    @mack-uv6gn หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Dynamic pricing 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @ThriftyCHNR
      @ThriftyCHNR หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      dystopia

    • @RudieObias
      @RudieObias หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's Capitalism.

    • @MatthewCasey
      @MatthewCasey หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The absolute bane of the common person. Imagine getting a fair price or a good deal from a business with a full-time revenue manager and algorithms to outsmart you.

    • @TransConBrilliance
      @TransConBrilliance หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They know the average American is not going to do the work of finding the best price, read the fine print and do their homework more than one sitting in from of the computer. I literally spend 2 months monitoring hotel room prices in order to get an idea of the price ranges including point conversions. Who wants to do that and that's just 1 hotel.

    • @d.b.cooper1
      @d.b.cooper1 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Even gave Taylor Swift a shoutout for driving crazy prices. Most 2024 thing ever along with the grotesque tech driven drive of 'dynamic pricing' which more often than not isn't simply a demand & supply equation.

  • @williamcarter3933
    @williamcarter3933 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    That woman has joined the Night King!

    • @RAJohnson713
      @RAJohnson713 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      for real lol

    • @goodpropltd8382
      @goodpropltd8382 หลายเดือนก่อน

      bro her eyes are crazy! she's definitely been beyond the wall @@RAJohnson713

    • @justayoutuber1906
      @justayoutuber1906 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Or Diary of a Vampire

  • @juanday9618
    @juanday9618 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very informative, very humble, keep up the awesome videos. I will follow you ,I liked this trading nice very good very interesting

  • @onlineshoppingjakarta7338
    @onlineshoppingjakarta7338 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Gouge pricing

  • @Dudevegaslv
    @Dudevegaslv หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    They are playing the McDonald’s play book!

    • @karanpatel8910
      @karanpatel8910 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Not really

    • @wadexyz
      @wadexyz 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      McDonald's owns about 70% of the buildings and 45% of the land at its locations worldwide. So quite a bit different.

  • @alphaTrader.oo1
    @alphaTrader.oo1 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I don't look at brand nowadays
    reviews are more accurate

  • @IseiNabuka
    @IseiNabuka 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Yep Marriott is winning big on Hotels branding in the South Pacific and bought hotels previously owned by Starwood Hotels and Resorts, when JW Marriott bought the brand back in 2016.

  • @jackiemasek8302
    @jackiemasek8302 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Not only are most hotels a franchise but there are also management companies that the employees of those hotels actually work for and not the franchisee or the main name hotel.

  • @Ratoo
    @Ratoo หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    How about enforce property owners to respect brand guidelines, and elite benefits, instead of letting them run away without any repercussion? If you treat yourself as a glorified OTA, then us customers act like so. I only go out of my way to stay at Hyatt. Marriott and Hilton don’t get my loyalty.

    • @TransConBrilliance
      @TransConBrilliance หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because the hotel can just switch brands with little business interruption. It's like amex demanding target to have lower prices if they want to accept amex cards. How well is that going to be received.

  • @samgriffith8086
    @samgriffith8086 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Some similarities to car dealerships economics. But still vastly different

  • @ronaldweaver6791
    @ronaldweaver6791 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. However I
    have tried for years to figure out which properties the Marriott family actually owns. Other than the two bridges office in Washington Washington DC

  • @abhishekvanenooru2869
    @abhishekvanenooru2869 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    the code that dynamically sets the prices in platform according to the demand amazes me

    • @Dayvit78
      @Dayvit78 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      It's a basic math function. How many rooms are left - up the price when there are fewer.

  • @Definemyluck
    @Definemyluck หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    MCR is a car wreck - I stayed in one of their properties for 3 years and I question how they are still in business

  • @DannerBanks
    @DannerBanks หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    So they are franchises basically?

    • @robertewalt7789
      @robertewalt7789 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The franchise restaurant chains, eg McDonalds, require a local business person to own (or lease) the property, and operate the business.

    • @johnyossarian9059
      @johnyossarian9059 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      And the brands don't own or operate the properties. They're just selling their flags for a cut of the revenue. Isn't that basically a franchise?
      Or am I getting the whole video wrong?

    • @wollinger
      @wollinger หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      No. There are owned, managed and franchise hotels carrying those flags.

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Basically, yes.

    • @nene5857
      @nene5857 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Yes it is precisely a franchised hotel.

  • @johnlittle8267
    @johnlittle8267 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Wyndham is much larger than Hyatt, but I guess they could get Hyatt to talk on camera. Nice video and information!

    • @thediversion77
      @thediversion77 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      True, but Hyatt makes more than 4x more revenue than Wyndham at a much smaller scale.
      It's all relative, sort of like the airline industry.. Southwest airlines flies more passengers per year than United but United makes more money per year.

  • @goeglenoegle
    @goeglenoegle หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just to make this clear (the video seems to suggest otherwise towards the end): the hotel industry is highly fragmented. Most hotels are small! Even Marriott as the biggest chain only holds a relatively percentage of market share world-wide: “Based on lodging industry data, we have an approximately 16 percent share of the U.S. hotel market and a four percent share of the hotel market outside the U.S. (based on number of rooms).“ (from their 2023 annual report)

  • @mrdr89
    @mrdr89 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How does Wyndham compare? I seem to see a lot of their hotels now

  • @ACC-2929
    @ACC-2929 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Recently at a TX doubletree Hilton a little 12 year old died in the pool bc of an exposed pipe… this explains why the mom couldn’t sue the actual Hilton company… such a sad story of something that could’ve been prevented… and just sucks that this is how they work. I’ve noticed a decline in some of the chains we frequent for vacation.

  • @pjacobsen1000
    @pjacobsen1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great explainer video! I guess the hotel industry has learned from the fast food industry. What industry will follow this path next? Air travel? You operate a B737 and you get to slap a 'Singapore Airlines' on the side, if you manage it well.

    • @and1513
      @and1513 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This is already sort of a thing. Some airlines don't own their aircraft, they lease them from a 3rd party.

  • @sterlingmichel4445
    @sterlingmichel4445 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm really loving this new peveat the WSJ is doing to other topics beside crazy politic, and cancel culture stuff.

  • @AndreaDoesYoga
    @AndreaDoesYoga หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Intriguing business model, didn't know this before! 😮

  • @SorminaESar
    @SorminaESar หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In fact that many hotels are so difficult to bring the customers to enjoy the living of hotel. Hyatt isn't cheap hotel, luxury hotel

  • @CoffeeHomeBrew
    @CoffeeHomeBrew หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes, if you are not staying in an actual Brand owned and operated hotel, you're getting a franchisee. Whoa, watch out! You can definitely tell the difference at every level of your stay.

  • @Chertoff88
    @Chertoff88 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Wow, the wall street journal actually doing some journalism for once.

  • @teddyschlong9063
    @teddyschlong9063 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I doubt they feel threatened by franchises flying their hotels under different banners. This is because most of Marriot's portfolio is specifically themed and stylized. Which would make it harder for franchisees to switch sides.

  • @mattbosley3531
    @mattbosley3531 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's just like restaurants, franchises. Everyone's doing it. Some retail chains do it as well.

  • @samuraijack1371
    @samuraijack1371 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Calling packet rolled oats and skim milk as break fast is just ridiculous

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or you’ll be fortunate enough to get $10 breakfast credit at restaurant. Marriott 😑. Where coffee is $7. A muffin is $5

  • @haepisaus
    @haepisaus 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Hotel franchises put their reputation on the line while the actual hotel operator just laughs in the face of guests complaining about their falling quality and standards. This is the kind of business model that will make these premium brand slowly lose its association with luxury.

  • @dool1002
    @dool1002 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So its like Airbnb but for hotels...
    I think its an opportunity for those owners to build their own brands and cut out the franchisor (legacy hotel brands)

  • @JordanEbanksLive
    @JordanEbanksLive หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonder a how much it cost to keep sandz? Would a love fi start keep events too

  • @firohot5476
    @firohot5476 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So like uber they charge same room at different rates per day of the week
    Even though their expenses remain constant through out the week

  • @mondo6595
    @mondo6595 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    there are a lot hampton inn in china, most of them are franchise hotels, which used to be a pretty bad builiding in aweful condition but the brand saved it from dying so the property owner owns the hotel but pay franchise money

  • @worldfamous260dewitt
    @worldfamous260dewitt 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Yes

  • @corner559
    @corner559 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hotels across brands have become too inconsistent, especially in North America. And it's unacceptable that many in the US are still serving room service in boxes which came about because of the pandemic and not returning to full tray service. It's these owners trying to squeeze every last dollar they can out of their properties.

  • @artema.5687
    @artema.5687 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice video, managing is everything:)

  • @pibob7880
    @pibob7880 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ok this makes sense, lower end hotels are not even necessary at attractive real estate locations.
    Why not rent your brand for those and concentrate your resources and management skills on the upper scale where the real money is

  • @FinancialFaiz
    @FinancialFaiz 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Where does OYO hotels come into this?

  • @eyesurgeon69
    @eyesurgeon69 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Bottom line, Marriott has sold out their control of quality and good customer experience for fast growth. Short term return for investors, who cares about our reputation if it doesn't affect the stock price this quarter.

    • @Dividendflywheel
      @Dividendflywheel 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You are correct Marriott stock has beat the S&P 500 going back to its IPO in 1998

  • @FGH9G
    @FGH9G 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I just hope that this industry consolidation doesn't lead to consumer price gouging and getting nickel and dimed left and right, like what usually happens with corporate monopolies!

  • @ScalperSpecltr
    @ScalperSpecltr หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hotels lately suck! They all worry about saving a buck, that the quality has sugfered! Id rather stay at independent hotel than a brand name if the service and quality are there. I think its time to start a hotel brand

  • @TransConBrilliance
    @TransConBrilliance หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This makes a lot of sense now as to why even elite member service at Marriott is so awful and so incredibly awful at specific regions. Clearly, Marriott don't care enough to make sure their most loyal customers aren't getting shafted by not getting the benefits that they are supposed to. And this explains why so many specific hotels can get away with not offering breakfast to elite members or room upgrades. 2 prime reasons to even achieve platinum and up at Marriott. The worst part is that the 3 big chains appears to be colluding in prices in big cities like paris, London. They would just raise prices together and sometimes dynamically with the dollar. Meanwhile if you look at expedia for prices outside of those 3 you'll notice significantly lower prices. While I'll still retain my Hilton business I'm dropping Marriott permanently because I doubt anything will change with them in the next 5 years.

    • @erebuxy
      @erebuxy หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is caused by a different issue. In US, nearly EVERYONE is an elite member, even gold is super common. They are so easy to get through Marriott credit cards. If you want to get room upgrades and special perks, you need to have higher tiers than most people (which is at least Platinum to Titanium in US). Elite member carries more value outside US.
      As for London, the price is probably driven up by frequent business travelers. Because free points and free elite status. Why not!

    • @newagain9964
      @newagain9964 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@erebuxynot only are u conflating the issues, but ur blaming the customer for the problem created by the (greedy and sleazy) seller. 🥱🙄

  • @TravelingGonad
    @TravelingGonad 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    That's why hotel reviews are more important than ever.

  • @TheTakesu205
    @TheTakesu205 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Why do they not mention about IHG at all in the video?
    Do they run by different strategy?

    • @RB-hm9re
      @RB-hm9re หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really, probably chose two American based companies

    • @mallu1001
      @mallu1001 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      IHG is a European company now… London based…

    • @condor7810
      @condor7810 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      TheTake: IHG runs the same strategy. IHG is quite a bit smaller than Hilton and Marriott. Though bigger than Hyatt.

    • @hewhohasnoidentity4377
      @hewhohasnoidentity4377 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It is called sponsored news. If you want to be discussed neutrally or positively in a video masquerading as factual you have to pay. IHG doesn't use this sort of marketing.

    • @jasonk125
      @jasonk125 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@condor7810 Big Four Market cap (USD):
      Marriott 72.23B
      Hilton 53.50B
      IHG 16.79B
      Hyatt 15.99B

  • @user-yv4gg7jb2f
    @user-yv4gg7jb2f 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Something was kind of rude to me recently as if i could not afford to sleep there if i wanted to... it was not hilton

  • @eddyeroyal6024
    @eddyeroyal6024 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    They licensed the name or franchise them, the analyst said it would unlock value.

  • @thomascuvillier7250
    @thomascuvillier7250 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    If people were more aware of this it would kill the brand name tho

  • @p3arworld
    @p3arworld 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    THIS is why basically every hotel feels like a 2-star experience. Unless you will pay $600+ a night at a 5-star hotelt, you are going to get the 2-star "franchise" experience smh. And it is still not cheap!

  • @bilsid
    @bilsid 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    So they are like McDonalds, Popeyes etc etc

  • @edr.2642
    @edr.2642 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Easy money for Hotel operators. Cleaning expense is like $5 per day. Smh. Utilities and supplies another $5. They charge $300 per night is crazy.

  • @nene5857
    @nene5857 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Yes and your product has suffered because of it! I’ve stayed at Marriott hotels that were on par with Days Inn. It’s very inconsistent and very telling.

  • @wesjimez2941
    @wesjimez2941 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's because they see a huge market crash and rising interest rates don't help.

  • @abhishekvanenooru2869
    @abhishekvanenooru2869 หลายเดือนก่อน

    super akka

  • @duran9664
    @duran9664 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So..
    Marriott & Hyatt r not more than tech companies now‼️ 🤷‍♀️

  • @Puzekat2
    @Puzekat2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does Marriott not being known by Marriott affect the customer? Reduction of quality. Lack of ability for the customer to know who is responsible for the property.

  • @zohanthecspro
    @zohanthecspro หลายเดือนก่อน

    Didint know Valak had a part time job with Marriott.

  • @jk484
    @jk484 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How do most independent hotels get bookings these days? Expedia?

  • @sngs9565
    @sngs9565 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Stop thinking of the fast food Business Model! Franchise hotels will never and have never managed to give any proper satisfaction to their brand! Worked in one and YIKES! It is about hospitality and your brand....and when you franchise that, what do you have??? No wonder hotel customer experience is going down, especially at Marriott!

  • @ms_foodaholic7021
    @ms_foodaholic7021 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What about Rosewood ?

  • @user-yf8yt3zq8s
    @user-yf8yt3zq8s 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    interesting!

  • @OHANA-BEACH-SUITES
    @OHANA-BEACH-SUITES หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I OWN MY BEACH RESORT! WE OPEN NEXT YEAR IN THE PHILIPPINES!

    • @erikgstewart
      @erikgstewart 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      HOW NICE! GOOD LUCK!

    • @OHANA-BEACH-SUITES
      @OHANA-BEACH-SUITES 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@erikgstewart Thank you! Hard work and dedication for several years! LETS GOOO!!!

  • @SDFNI3894YR
    @SDFNI3894YR 16 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    idk why some ppl are saying this vid is complicated. to me, it was simple n linear.

  • @ScalperSpecltr
    @ScalperSpecltr หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I need more information. How do these hotels make money and what are profits like for owners? Who is taking the risk?

    • @TransConBrilliance
      @TransConBrilliance หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They made themselves to be more like a credit card company than a hotel that you knew 25 years ago business model wise.

    • @Sololeveler344
      @Sololeveler344 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They make money of events that are multi figures .

    • @Dividendflywheel
      @Dividendflywheel 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@TransConBrilliancegreat comparison to credit card companies. They have adopted an asset light model that allows them to make nice profits from their brand.

    • @Dividendflywheel
      @Dividendflywheel 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The big brands Marriott Hilton sell rights to use their (name) brand. It’s basically a licensing agreement.
      The hotel owner makes a decent living by running a very efficient business. And they are incentivized to grow by owning different hotel brands under the Marriott family. For example the same entrepreneur person (or family) might own more than one of the 30 hotel brands under the Marriott umbrella

  • @jovanmitrovic8619
    @jovanmitrovic8619 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    In previous video hyatt ceo said they own 50 % an in this video you said 2

    • @teasy2518
      @teasy2518 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Most likely this video was created around the period when Hyatt made two significant acquisitions, notably expanding their portfolio of managed and franchised units compared to owned properties. These acquisitions were Lindner in Europe and the Apple Leisure Group, which specializes in all-inclusive resorts.

    • @kodekabuki
      @kodekabuki หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same. I’m confused too. They even have excerpts of the interview with the CEO from the other video here but the 2% vs 50% numbers contradict each other.

  • @oleksandrs1102
    @oleksandrs1102 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s like airbnb )

  • @Dayvit78
    @Dayvit78 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This isn't new. I studied this in grad school in the early 2000's. It's not just the top tier hotels, but Motel 6, Days Inn, etc.

  • @DreLBrown529
    @DreLBrown529 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I guess Hilton owns a much higher percentage of their hotels since they weren’t listed with Marriott and Hyatt as owning only 1 to 2 percent of their hotels.

    • @TransConBrilliance
      @TransConBrilliance หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That's what I think too and the reason why my room upgrade chances with Hilton is 80% and with Marriott it's more like 30%. Except San Diego areas where both of them are 0% in the last 7 years and I go there often.

    • @minhdo2631
      @minhdo2631 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I’m a Hilton Loyalist

  • @jonosay854
    @jonosay854 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's "Mare-ii-ett" and not "Mare-ii-ott?"
    *I, and everyone i know, including Hotel Staff, have been saying it wrong for 30 years??

  • @warrenbuffet1801
    @warrenbuffet1801 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why not mention IHG?