Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Method | Simple Explanation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @soofibieber98
    @soofibieber98 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'm so thankful for these videos. I'm doing my thesis on this and I hadn't understand it a lot until now. Thank you professor

  • @MertD5860
    @MertD5860 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU Sir,
    Very helpful video, this planet is glad to have you between us

  • @GBOLAGUNANTHONY
    @GBOLAGUNANTHONY 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you prof.
    Can you do a video about laddering method and hierrachical value mapping.

  • @edaoamano4616
    @edaoamano4616 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    GOOD PRESENTATION,GO A HEAD.

  • @bioenerginusantara
    @bioenerginusantara 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great work with Excellent sample...Thank You.

  • @deepaligaikwad1252
    @deepaligaikwad1252 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Kindly make a video on different MCDM methods and compare them. So that we can choose the best one

    • @RESEARCHHUB
      @RESEARCHHUB  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the suggestion, will do soon. Meanwhile, you can take the free course on AHP at researchhub.org/course/analytic-hierarchy-process/

  • @md.rayhansarker3769
    @md.rayhansarker3769 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation @Munim Sir.

  • @ahmedradhi6628
    @ahmedradhi6628 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you very much

  • @MdAbulKalamAzadBD
    @MdAbulKalamAzadBD 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great work! Thanks

  • @markbruce80
    @markbruce80 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nokia should have had a higher rating for price 😉...it was the lowest $600. Small typo but great video chief 👍

  • @louisematiasivvelayo2893
    @louisematiasivvelayo2893 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello, this was a really great video! Could you elaborate more on what you said about ranking the criteria's (2:25)? What methods would be used to do this? Could you kindly point me in the right direction to explore this further as I may apply this to my thesis ☺

  • @TamladiptaSenBheem
    @TamladiptaSenBheem 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good Morning Sir!
    Sorry to disturb you.
    Sir, if I want to rank few entities based on some beneficial and non-beneficial financial criteria having data value in positive, negative and zero, then (QUESTION 1) which MCDM techniques should I use to rank them?
    (QUESTION 2) In such scenario, generally whether Distance-Based approach is preferable or outranking based approach is preferable?

  • @tomasfinucci5908
    @tomasfinucci5908 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi! Great video! Just a question, do weights need to be determined arbitrarily based on my own valuation of each criteria, or are there any type of steps I should follow in order to determine them? Thanks!

  • @imtiazhabibb
    @imtiazhabibb หลายเดือนก่อน

    how about Fuzzy BWM? i need more explanation

  • @tonyosime9380
    @tonyosime9380 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thanks. Must weights always add up to 100? Is the percentage system the best approach?

  • @hakankosebas2085
    @hakankosebas2085 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir could you explain this paper please? Dealing with value constraints in decision making using MCDM methods by Abdelkrim Abdelli, Lynda Mokdad, Youcef Hammal

  • @zewdutessema1222
    @zewdutessema1222 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Any video about DEMATEL approach please?

  • @srikarys8792
    @srikarys8792 ปีที่แล้ว

  • @toriton4021
    @toriton4021 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You shouldn’t rate Nokia price base on 6.. logically is 9 because its the cheapest

  • @edaoamano4616
    @edaoamano4616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I WANT TO SEE NEW VIDEOS HOW TO USE AHP SOFT WARE?

    • @RESEARCHHUB
      @RESEARCHHUB  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      We will publish videos on AHP soon. Meanwhile, you can take this free AHP course at researchhub.org/course/analytic-hierarchy-process/