Good Morning Sir! Sorry to disturb you. Sir, if I want to rank few entities based on some beneficial and non-beneficial financial criteria having data value in positive, negative and zero, then (QUESTION 1) which MCDM techniques should I use to rank them? (QUESTION 2) In such scenario, generally whether Distance-Based approach is preferable or outranking based approach is preferable?
Hi! Great video! Just a question, do weights need to be determined arbitrarily based on my own valuation of each criteria, or are there any type of steps I should follow in order to determine them? Thanks!
Hello, this was a really great video! Could you elaborate more on what you said about ranking the criteria's (2:25)? What methods would be used to do this? Could you kindly point me in the right direction to explore this further as I may apply this to my thesis ☺
sir could you explain this paper please? Dealing with value constraints in decision making using MCDM methods by Abdelkrim Abdelli, Lynda Mokdad, Youcef Hammal
I'm so thankful for these videos. I'm doing my thesis on this and I hadn't understand it a lot until now. Thank you professor
THANK YOU Sir,
Very helpful video, this planet is glad to have you between us
Great work with Excellent sample...Thank You.
GOOD PRESENTATION,GO A HEAD.
Thank you very much
Great explanation @Munim Sir.
thank you!
Kindly make a video on different MCDM methods and compare them. So that we can choose the best one
Thanks for the suggestion, will do soon. Meanwhile, you can take the free course on AHP at researchhub.org/course/analytic-hierarchy-process/
Thank you prof.
Can you do a video about laddering method and hierrachical value mapping.
Good Morning Sir!
Sorry to disturb you.
Sir, if I want to rank few entities based on some beneficial and non-beneficial financial criteria having data value in positive, negative and zero, then (QUESTION 1) which MCDM techniques should I use to rank them?
(QUESTION 2) In such scenario, generally whether Distance-Based approach is preferable or outranking based approach is preferable?
Great work! Thanks
Hi! Great video! Just a question, do weights need to be determined arbitrarily based on my own valuation of each criteria, or are there any type of steps I should follow in order to determine them? Thanks!
Hello, this was a really great video! Could you elaborate more on what you said about ranking the criteria's (2:25)? What methods would be used to do this? Could you kindly point me in the right direction to explore this further as I may apply this to my thesis ☺
Great video, thanks. Must weights always add up to 100? Is the percentage system the best approach?
Nokia should have had a higher rating for price 😉...it was the lowest $600. Small typo but great video chief 👍
sir could you explain this paper please? Dealing with value constraints in decision making using MCDM methods by Abdelkrim Abdelli, Lynda Mokdad, Youcef Hammal
Any video about DEMATEL approach please?
Will come soon
❤
I WANT TO SEE NEW VIDEOS HOW TO USE AHP SOFT WARE?
We will publish videos on AHP soon. Meanwhile, you can take this free AHP course at researchhub.org/course/analytic-hierarchy-process/
You shouldn’t rate Nokia price base on 6.. logically is 9 because its the cheapest