Revolution#3299 if ever they do bring back the woolly mammoth pretty sure they are gonna protect them but if someone kills it they are probably gonna fine that person
Ancient human: Mammoths are dangerous, kids. We have to hunt them in groups, so they don't hunt us. Don't go near them. Modern human: hahah bring back floofy elephanttt Edit: aah yes I know that's not how mammoths work i was making a joke! 😅
Ethan Li We can do both. Those two things are entirely different, cloning abilities will also help those endangered species. Your argument is as valid as saying “We ShOuLd hELp the EARth FIrST BEforE we EXPlorE SpAcE”
My great grandma told me in the early 1990s about seeing a passenger pigeon when she was in her twenties around 1900... I personally would love to see an auroch , woolly mammoth, woolly rhino , and above all a dodo bird.
Imagine if the Wholly Mammoth and other types of prehistoric Elephant species were successfully brought back to life, the ivory dealers around the world would then hunt them to extinction yet again.
What this video fails to mention is that those mammoths would actually be kept in a wild-life reserve in Siberia called "Pleistocene Park". They would not just be set out in a random forest. Besides, from what i have read on the subject, they are actually planning to release the modern day equivalents of Pleistocene carnivores in the area too, which should ensure some kind of balance.
Judars_envy, the problem is that they are going to keep those mammoths in Siberia, Russia, their former habitat. And believe it or not, in Siberia there is actually a huge problem with ivory hunters who sell the mammoth ivory that they recover from the permafrost. The good thing however is that the park they're planning to keep those mammoths in, is actually monitored, so that would reduce the hunt for ivory against living mammophants.
The species that clearly went extinct because of human activity should be brought back, if possible. Species that went extinct naturally should not be brought back.
I don't think its a good idea because nature has adapted without them too just like those which went extinct naturally. So it might disrupt the normal course of events.
Caleb Brittain nah nah nah, they went extinct due to humans The animals have survived a bunch of ice ages before that and were adapted to the conditions, why would they choose the last one to die out suddenly and randomly?
MotionBrixBro Animations, that would honestly be insane.😂 I guess you could say it’s kinda playing the role of god, but it’s important that we do “revive” some of the most recent species that went extinct.
Vada: That's right. That would be good because then we could get them to roam in large numbers again, then we could serve them on the dinner table. I'm sure their meat is very good.
actually introducing large herbivores to the tudnra had a positive effect in some places - the soil got better, snow was crashed and the ground got colder, so release of methane in the permafrost slowed down, grass was able to grow instead of moss, etc. The mammoth steppe can be a much better biome by nearly every means than a low producing tundra. And we know that around 12000 years ago it was the single largest biome on the planet, and worked really well. So I say go for it, we need the mammoths back.
@@ajlucky0076 don't bring them back as a species, think Jurassic Park style, like a zoo, but have someone with a mind to run or be in charge and much better security measures, in the movies there are plot conveniences that's why it might seem as if we couldn't control them. Just to let you know, we humans are powerful, dare I say, if dinos lived among us, they wouldn't go near the cities that often if they did we would nuke the sh*t out of them. Our weapons are so f*cking dangerous, it becomes amazing what we did with our minds. We as a species have so much control over the others.If we can keep Lions, Tigers, etc at bay, we tackle these guys.
They want the wooly mammoth to return to Siberia to preserve the perma frost. The tree lands keep the ground warm and help melt the perma frost. Yhe mammoth will destroy the trees and maintain grass lands.
I say we should genetically engineer griffins, minotaurs, trolls, orcs, and dragons. Then, introduce them into human environments to keep our population down and to create environmental pressures, making us evolve into powerful wizards and super strong warriors
If they release them into the wild. But they won't... Too valuable... Gotta make money on showing them in some kind of zoo. Jurassic Park style... until they break out and kill as all.
Inherit earth? We aren't any better than any other extinct species. We eventually will die off. We may be the known brains of the universe but the universe doesn't owe us anything...
@@wokewaifu3955 maybe, maybe not we have something the other species dont have knowledge we know there is an universe out there and that will be our salvation if we dont kill ourselves with nukes (i wouldnt be surprised) humanity has a really good chance of surviving
Flournoy mason you really think those scientists are putting millions of dollars into these projects out of the kindness of their hearts??? That they are going to let it go. Hell no, they’re probably going to keep it in their lab and experiment and cross breed it.
@@queenspalace9582 I understand your point, indeed it wont be done from the kindness of anybodies heart, it's not how it works. But, are you suggesting that there wouldn't be any scientific purpose to putting them out into a specifically assigned natural habitat, to be able to intermingle again with the rest of the natural world around it? What happens if they breed it, then would they consider a breeding programme or killing them off when there are too many. The thing I'm alluding too is the snowball effect of doing this all research about mammoths for decades and having enough materials to make a mammoth, will it just spiral to a point where some team of people will eventually do it anyway just to watch and see, or for emotional purposes? In a way the counter-argument to what I'm saying is similar to what the video says at 6:25 on-wards about if it's really the right thing to do. Two forces are at role here, Humanity's will and Natures will. Personally though, I'm just not sure if it's the right thing to do. How mammoths became extinct could be entirely circumstantial, for a hypothetical example - ""10,000 years ago they could of died out to a small number from natural causes *and then* humans killed them because humans were too, on the brink of extinction and hunted these creatures to survive"" - then would we say "humans caused their extinction and thus need to replace them" or "Humans were playing an expected and predictable role in the ecosystem, thus it was only natural for mammoths to become extinct." - "Humans hunted these creatures but could not of been substantial enough to cause the final blow" OR another hypothetical example to contrast the first one - ""10,000 years ago they became immediately extinct because of natural disasters and changing climates"" - Then it'd be that section from 6:25 - "is it right for nature?" or "is it right to do now, is it too late?" - Until there is enough evidence to say exactly how the entire population of mammoths became extinct then it's pretty hard to say whether Humans should play a role in using science to bring these creatures back into the ecosystem. If there is even evidence left to prove it. Instead it's far more easier to record what is alive now, stop and replace the things we've brought to extinction, knowing full well we were responsible for something and that it wont screw up the ecosystem and even possibly the biosphere of bacterial life.
We're the only ones who can bring them back. We're the only ones who understand how to keep the environment safe and save animals. It's our responsibility. We owe them for what we did. And we can learn from it. And remember what had happened before us. Something that we never knew would happen.
Maha you know hunting is actually beneficial to species if don’t correctly right, poaching on the other hand is wrong no matter what. The difference being that one regulates animal population and the other takes more animals than necessary and sells them for profit.
How about we save their DNA, hunt them to extinction and then release like dinosaurs and shit, get them to breed then after that we hunt them to extinction and rinse and repeat? You know every 50 years or so to keep shit interesting.
Save the turtles wasps aren’t useless, they’re more hunter types, like spiders they keep the population of other creatures down, and some of them even pollinate just like bees, and humans aren’t useless sure we’ve done bad but think positive think of all the good, times cats have been attacked by dogs and have been saved by humans or apes have had diseases and worms in them and doctors have saved them, no animal could do some of these things themselves just saying
I don't mean to sound like a rude person, but I recall stories being mentioned on cloning the Mammoth in 2002, when I was in Kindergarten. It's almost 2022, twenty years later. I just am really interested in realistic time frames...
Bringing back animals which went extinct a hundred years ago would very unlikely affect the environment that they originally lived in because it takes many thousands of years for creatures to adapt and evolve to a new environment.
It would, actually, imagine putting a pack of saber tooth cats in Africa. That would DESTROY the food chain, because now Lions have new competitors. Same with Dire Wolves. They would not only push normal wolves out, but they would also destroy the herbivore species because they are much smaller prey than what they used to hunt
I watched the documentary “Raising the Mammoths” on Discovery channel. Dr. Kazufumi Goto (I may have misspelled his name) was the lead scientist. I was about 15 when I watched the documentary. Now I am 35. Over 20 years and after millions of dollars dollars spent, there is no result. And all this for what? In the race of reviving extinct species, we as humans forgot to take care what we currently have.
The are humans still and process emotions. They will still be by far the second smartest organism behind us. God don’t bring an innocent,creature to life for our amusement.
I used to think mammoths were still a thing when I was little haha. I hope this actually happens, I love mammoths. Just a shame that we can’t bring dinosaurs back too :(
They will likely be first released in Siberia in a national park called Pleistocene park, where they would actually be used to prevent permafrost from thawing by reestablishing and protecting the mammoth steppe
But the role the wooly mammoth played in the ecosystem hasn't been filled.... Many forests and grasslands of Siberia and north America have not been the same. People have to bulldoze forest lands and grass to let others grow. Theirs a park in Siberia made for that. It has bison, elk, moose, horse. And it's waiting for the mammoth. Then their they can release it and see what kind of impact it does.
Jack Leo the whole of Australia got turned into desert when we lost our large grazers. Some theorise we should bring elephants into the ecosystem to replace the lost megafauna.
Jack Leo this is pop science. They try to make everything sound potential. Obviously it wont work due to less oxygen and different enviorments. These animal will become smaller than their ancestors and we would probably just make them to see how they taste and sell their meat for ridiculously high prices meh
0:18 "but what if we could bring them back? What if extinction didn't have to be forever? We're going back in time on a safari with a difference, as wildlife adventurer Nigel Marven plunges into prehistory to rescue creatures on the brink of extinction. His plan is to bring them back to the saftey of the present and give them a second chance. Welcome to the ultimate wildlife sanctuary. Welcome to Prehistoric Park" Duh duuuuuuh du duuuuuuuuh du DUUUUUUUH DUUUUUUUH!
I loved that show! However, I always wondered whether many of those animals would even be able to live in today's climate. Arthropleura, for example, was around when the atmosphere was much richer in oxygen than it is today. Its great size means it probably wouldn't get enough oxygen to survive in the present day.
Why start with something so old when we could help bring back the species that are on the brink of extinction now or some of the more recently extinct animals instead? Seems weird to start with something so old, I'd think it would make more sense to start with animals that would be easier to determine what the impact on an ecosystem would be.
mydyingparadiselost, that's actually what these scientist are doing in the first place. However, whenever someone mentions a mammoth, all attention is focused on that. The techniques presented in this video is, in the first place, being used to help modern day animals who are on the brink of extinction. Btw: What the video also fails to mention is that this research, in particular by "Restore&Revive" wasn't actually meant to be used in the de-extinction of the mammoth, but rather in possible genetical modification of the asian elephant, to make it more adepted to colder climates and as such, giving it more chance to survive . The media however popularised the concept and called it "the resurection of the mammoth", which i can understand, given the fact that they indeed try to give the asian elephant thick hair and fat.
Did you watch the video? They said we are not even able to do this yet but maybe in the next 10 years. The video also stated they should start off with something like the passenger pigeon, instead of a woolly mammoth. It also said just because they can do this, doesn't mean they will or should.
Introducing a new species to an environment could have many positive effects such as more trees, greener grass, more flourishing plant life, cleaner air, and different animals. But it could have negative effects like the opposite of the things I just listed. Like the guy said in the video, we need to know which species will have the greatest positive impact and focus on those first.
Again, researchers can multi task. Conserving animals existing today has moderate success but it's not perfect. So why not put new organisms to fill up that niche?
Yes we should if we can. The Wolfs in Yellowstone was a great thing! Very successful for the park! A few Mammoths in a designated area can be a site to behold! There are enormous areas in Russia that are completely empty, and they could eat all the grass they want over there.
Can we just de extinct the most recent animals that went extinct while their role is still in nature and is still there and not yet taken over by another.
@@gre3nishsinx0Rgold4 Because people are gonna want extinct animals like mammoths, sabers, etc. to come back so they can see something new. I think it is smarter to bring back the more recent animals because of their role in nature, but people want something new so they probably won't care.
It doesnt matter. Even if you brought them back they wouldnt refill their niche. They are taught their lifestyle and niche by thier parents and community. It would take a long time to teach them how to survive without other members of ots species to teach it. Look up this problem in newzealand with a bird species that was saved from extinction but no longer behaves like its ancestors but rather another bird species that scientists introduced them to.
Although it's traditionally thought that passenger pigeons died because we killed them directly with hunting, is is unlikely this is the sole cause. Based on genetic analysis it seems that the minimum genetically self-sustaining population of passenger pigeons (which once numbered in the billions) was only about 330,000. www.theguardian.com/science/grrlscientist/2014/jun/16/passenger-pigeon-extinction-population-fluctuations-human-exploitation Environmental changes wrought by European settlers possibly coupled with the chestnut blight (American chestnuts were a big food source for passenger pigeons) may have produced a huge population boom followed by a massive die-off. That is the billions of passenger pigeons darkening the skies may not have been the norm, but a population explosion produced when Europeans turned virgin, unbroken forests into patchwork forests. Then when the population crashed from billions to a more normal amount (let's say millions), but people kept hunting them as though billions was the norm, it was the last nail in the coffin. That's one theory that's circulating anyhow. Another theory is that passenger pigeon flocks had to be huge or they'd go extinct. That is they weren't hunted to extinction, but the flock sizes were reduced to what most people would consider quite sustainable numbers, but which unfortunately weren't.
A lot of animals that became extinct because humans being human(hunting,irrational fear when the animals wasn’t even a threat)probably deserve the number one spot
Don't be silly! Your personality and your memory die with your body. When you die YOU cease to exist. The cloned one is a totally different person. Just think about identical twins.
Uncle Snowman, yes but also considering earth has changed so much overtime for an example global warming. Releasing mammoths in the wild might not be a very good idea considering their habitat is getting hotter and hotter as global warming continues.
Could you not create large drive through reserves to house the resurrected species? Charge people to visit so that you can use the revenue to continue your work. That way they would be in a controlled environment and would have a much lesser impact on local ecosystems, all the while you're preserving one of the amazing creatures who once roamed this Earth. Let's get this post seen eh?
It would be better to work on keeping threatened species from becoming extinct. Such as rhinoceroses, whooping cranes, a whole range of animals and plants. If the ecosystems that mammoths lived in are gone, it might not be possible to find a territory where they could survive. The end of the ice age made the solid land that they could walk on previously soft, and they sunk into mud and could not get out. Now the warming of the atmosphere might reduce the amount of land they could live on.
That is my point. You ned dna diversity to avoid in breading. Thus. How many do we need to clone to get a stable healthy population? And can we ensure genetic variation?
I believe the general rule of thumb for humans is 50 human males and 50 human females, so I can only assume you would need a minimum of the same amount to have a population of passenger pigeons with enough genetic variation.
It's not just cloning, but also selective gene editing that makes de-extinction plausible. So options may be to artificially introduce signifigant genetic variation to a population, or to remove perceived detrimental recessives.
+nmcguireable Yes 100 is enough if you selecting the mates. And from there you might be able to breed the birds until you have enough to release the into the wild. Maybe. But that is still finding 100 useful DNA samples of passenger pigeons.
De-Extinction is good if we choose right one for us . For example elephant bird . If we recreate them then we don't need to kill 50 chicken for its meat , but we need only to kill "one" elephant bird to produce that much meat . I mean meat industry is huge . We need to reintroduce certain extinct species for our huge meat demands
Sorry to burst your bubble but elephant birds would likey reproduce far more slowly than a chicken and thus not really be tenable for farming in a comparable manner.
The thing is tho, that we are allready producing to much meat, because the overall consumption of meat is actually decreasing. We throw tons and tons of meat away every year. So why do we need even more of it? And yes we do need more meat in the third world countries to help them with their hunger, but that can be fixed by redistribution.
**casually holding a dead bird**
Bad Good Dog
Good Dog that’s not a real dead bird
*holds a dead cat*
It's a specimen. It's this not weird. iT sCieNce
Don’t worry. It’s just sleeping.
2017: we’re getting close
2019: yea bout that..
Give it 8 more years or so
haha!
#@@TopRanky ad we still will be saying about that
Blake don’t rush science. It will be TOTALLY worth it
Pretty much still waiting on that bitch😂
I swear it was back in 2009 when they said the same thing, "less then ten years we will resurrect extinct species"
than
Yesss I've been waiting for a woolley mammoth since like 2005
Stop trying to hope.
Hope it's just another evil plague in Pandora's box.
It's a bad idea ethically speaking, to bring back a dead animal just to see if it could hypothetically still survive or more importantly, thrive.
Because they did it in 2009 it was a ibex sadly the copy died
Scientist: We present to you the woolly mammoth
Climate Change: Let me introduce myself
Humans: Let me introduce myself, I need your hide.
Revolution#3299 if ever they do bring back the woolly mammoth pretty sure they are gonna protect them but if someone kills it they are probably gonna fine that person
Climate change has been proven fake. Same with wooly mammoths.
@@raptorm8242 surreee it is buddy
Jaangggleejunction Thanks man. Finally someone with some sense.
"We have the habitat for a mammoth"
Not for long we won't .-.
Humans: We have technology
Big bad space rock: *Not for long you wont*
Humans:
@@LazyLoonz Rockets: Am i a joke to you?
@@LazyLoonz humans: we have technology to destroy meteor
Sun: gotta turn into red giant
Humans: gotta get out of the solar system
@Mohammed Ali the g thats the plan, mammoths can help stopping climate change. im not gonna go into detail but you can look it up
@@jonatansvar8076 by marching through the deep snow it rises and makes the air cooler?
Would love to see a Wooly Mammoth casually strolling in my backyard one day...
It would kill you
Cohen Jackson dragons aren’t real sorry
That’s the same as saying that about an elephant
Until it starts heading towards your house
It will likely use is tusk to kill you
Thanos is undoing his snapping in the thumbnail! XD
Ali107 he is de-snapping
Quantum realm did help
THANOS XD. GREAT MEME XD XD XD THANOS. MARVEL. GUYS. SUPER HEROES, LOL CORPORATE MEMES GUYS. HAHAHAHAHA TWITTEEERR
I just want extinct animals to be resurrected because of their avilities
Ali107 Spider-Man pulled out an uno reverse card.
Mammoth: I'm back y'all!
China: *Mammoth meat 0.99ct*
Jajaja
Covid -20 Pro lite ultra max
Covid-20 allow me to introduce myself
Wouldn't the meat be gene manipulated then? Some wouldn't like that.
Also china:
Dried mammoth penis 20.000$
That mammoth on the thumbnail doesn't feel so good.
Thanos look what you did
THANOS “mommy mammoth I don’t wanna go”
"Mr.Caveman,I don't feel so good"
THANOS ooooooofff
THANOS you better bring that poor baby back you madman
Imagine the dodobird being alive. Meme sensation
Authur Morgan blob fish and dodo bird
Arthur didn’t you die how are you still alive in 2019
Wow thats what people care about? I'm more interested in live action Jurassic Park!
@@ecstaticpenguin768 That is less probable tho
@@tigerj2533 Authur* not Arthur.
I hope they revive Manny.. But I wouldn't be comfortable with Diego tho
XD
Bring back Sid the sloth
I want Diego too... he’s more badass
Wakandan Knuckles Yes
Bring back Diego’s girlfriend
Ancient human: Mammoths are dangerous, kids. We have to hunt them in groups, so they don't hunt us. Don't go near them.
Modern human: hahah bring back floofy elephanttt
Edit: aah yes I know that's not how mammoths work i was making a joke! 😅
😂😂😂😂
#BRINGBACKMANNY!
Lmao
Lmaooo
birdspiracy there not dangerous
We should help endangered species first before revive the extinct.
Ethan Li fact
Ethan Li it’s about money they think in it too
Ethan Li We can do both. Those two things are entirely different, cloning abilities will also help those endangered species. Your argument is as valid as saying “We ShOuLd hELp the EARth FIrST BEforE we EXPlorE SpAcE”
@@Boofus90 Cloned animals cannot breed.
【ᐯlᐯIᗪ】! They can help us to learn how to protect the endangered animals even better or quicker
The MAMMOTH wasn't feeling well in THUMBNAIL!!!😂😂
CREEPY NERD Mr Caveman I don't feel to good
CREEPY NERD you beat me to it😂
GOSH DARNIT I WAS ABOUT TO COMMENT THAT
boo galoo *Mr homosapien I don't feel so good*
Mr.human, I don't feel so good...
Mammoth: Mr. Stark, I don't feel so good.
Jan M underrated Comment
Mr. Earth*
I'm snorting I'm laughing so hard and I feel so bad about it😂😂😂
I don’t get it
Stfu
My great grandma told me in the early 1990s about seeing a passenger pigeon when she was in her twenties around 1900... I personally would love to see an auroch , woolly mammoth, woolly rhino , and above all a dodo bird.
I would love a thylacine as a pet, just dont let it near your sheep or chooks
A Wooly Rhino and Wooly Mammoth are set too far back to not have negative consequences on environment's and ecosystem's
@@cosmicfantasies they lived with musk oxes 10.000 years arent that long like dino age
ikr, dodos would be awesome.
Dodo bird could come back since now, because of Colossal Labs & Biosciences
Seeker: mammoths can be brought back
Me: stop,don’t give me hope
It's going too happen
I said stop
I’m sorry I didn’t give it sooner
Fp1 and fp2: Ferrari get 1,2
Me: don't give me hope
@@markhamill8623 never
You forgot bullet point four in that list: Controlling the poacher population.
marrier9999 we should hunt them to extinction
@@konakano7955 he meant hunting poacher population
Imagine if the Wholly Mammoth and other types of prehistoric Elephant species were successfully brought back to life, the ivory dealers around the world would then hunt them to extinction yet again.
What this video fails to mention is that those mammoths would actually be kept in a wild-life reserve in Siberia called "Pleistocene Park". They would not just be set out in a random forest. Besides, from what i have read on the subject, they are actually planning to release the modern day equivalents of Pleistocene carnivores in the area too, which should ensure some kind of balance.
Judars_envy, the problem is that they are going to keep those mammoths in Siberia, Russia, their former habitat. And believe it or not, in Siberia there is actually a huge problem with ivory hunters who sell the mammoth ivory that they recover from the permafrost. The good thing however is that the park they're planning to keep those mammoths in, is actually monitored, so that would reduce the hunt for ivory against living mammophants.
They would hysterically converge on them from, all directions. Maybe even the scientists will be in on selling ivory.
Nah, we could genetically print ivory and reduce it's value. Thus.....no hunting.
JUDARS_ENVY yea they would plains wolf and northeastern wolf is extinct already
Which extinct animal brings back the Amazon??
Napalm
Human logical thinking of the impacts of forest fires
@@fawls13 This is the greatest comment
Some protobees that would help pollonate maybe?
@@fawls13 What is this!? Vietnam?
The species that clearly went extinct because of human activity should be brought back, if possible. Species that went extinct naturally should not be brought back.
I don't think its a good idea because nature has adapted without them too just like those which went extinct naturally. So it might disrupt the normal course of events.
any animal with large enough numbers causes extinctions
most of those animals went extinct because of the ice age ?
Caleb Brittain nah nah nah, they went extinct due to humans
The animals have survived a bunch of ice ages before that and were adapted to the conditions, why would they choose the last one to die out suddenly and randomly?
So you saying we should bring back the dinosaurs, because a big ass asteroid falling from the sky don't occur in nature.
Imagine being able to tell ur grandchildren in like 50 yrs that you lived in a time without mammoths and seeing their reaction
MotionBrixBro Animations, that would honestly be insane.😂 I guess you could say it’s kinda playing the role of god, but it’s important that we do “revive” some of the most recent species that went extinct.
That profile pic tho
@@mangoanimatedproductions1864 you are cool your animations with lego are great
Vada: That's right. That would be good because then we could get them to roam in large numbers again, then we could serve them on the dinner table. I'm sure their meat is very good.
The thumb nail is
Sid, I don’t feel so good
Plasma Core lol
Plasma Core lol
Plasma Core stark*
Goku mui dokkan battle lol u didn't get the joke
Goku mui dokkan battle watch "Ice age" I think that's the title of the movie he is referencing
actually introducing large herbivores to the tudnra had a positive effect in some places - the soil got better, snow was crashed and the ground got colder, so release of methane in the permafrost slowed down, grass was able to grow instead of moss, etc. The mammoth steppe can be a much better biome by nearly every means than a low producing tundra. And we know that around 12000 years ago it was the single largest biome on the planet, and worked really well. So I say go for it, we need the mammoths back.
Sid, I don’t feel so good
No no no i don’t want to go
Mamoth: Human, i don't feel so good
*Thumbnail*
I need a meme gif of this right now.
Wow much likes very amaze 😮😮😮
Haha i got it first
Best comment
Why?
I wish they brought back the sabertooth tiger or a dire wolf
kai lim why tho? Is it important？
I mean, I think they are really cool but, I'm pretty sure we would all be dead lol
@@ajlucky0076 don't bring them back as a species, think Jurassic Park style, like a zoo, but have someone with a mind to run or be in charge and much better security measures, in the movies there are plot conveniences that's why it might seem as if we couldn't control them. Just to let you know, we humans are powerful, dare I say, if dinos lived among us, they wouldn't go near the cities that often if they did we would nuke the sh*t out of them. Our weapons are so f*cking dangerous, it becomes amazing what we did with our minds. We as a species have so much control over the others.If we can keep Lions, Tigers, etc at bay, we tackle these guys.
@@gandalfthegrey2592 I guess you're right
Gandalf the Grey we probably wouldn’t use nukes, I just imagine walled cities with turrets taking out Dinos that wandered too close
In the future scientists will find a perfectly intact dinosaur frozen in Antarctica.
It would still be all rock.
What is dead may never die
don nivo but don't you only die twice?
what is dead may never die!
What? Learn english first. Specially about past & present tense.
But rises again, harder and stronger
NASA HQ HOLY SHIT RELAX BRUH SEARCH FOR IT AND YOULL FIND OUT DONT JUST STRAIGHT SHIT TALK
6:03 Scientist: I'm not sure I'm comfortable with releasing weird, hairy Asian elephants into the tundra...
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa dude.
Das racist
Lol
-2019
Lol 😂You stoopid
Because he’s freaking bald
Scientist:*Brings back extinct animals”
Global warming: I’m about to end this mans whole career
They want the wooly mammoth to return to Siberia to preserve the perma frost. The tree lands keep the ground warm and help melt the perma frost. Yhe mammoth will destroy the trees and maintain grass lands.
Scientist: we have brought them back the mammoth
Mammoth: hello father
I say we should genetically engineer griffins, minotaurs, trolls, orcs, and dragons. Then, introduce them into human environments to keep our population down and to create environmental pressures, making us evolve into powerful wizards and super strong warriors
Andrew Godly i'm done....
I’m joining House Thunderbird. Easy.
Andrew Godly you must be those believe gamer person the belive And life can be like a game
Life is a game. It's just not a particularly good one. All I'm proposing is a way to make it better
Andrew Godly this should be top comment
Wow... Thanos killed the mammoth!?!?
Dude. 0 *Mr Homosapien I don't feel so good*
omg stfu there is like a billion comments of these
No, you can’t bring them back. He used the stones to destroy the stones.
Dr. Duck feet endgame reference 👀
Oh my gosh yes! ThAnoS
General Kanoobi!
The day we see a Mammoth, humankind will change for the better. This is truly genius level work. Thank you, in advance, to everyone who contributes
SaberTooth Tiger
David Ramos your profile picture made me think there was a hair in my screen tried to clean it
David Ramos he’ll ya
No way would anyone allow an apex predator to be reincarnated. Large Herbivores, yes. Carnivorous apex predators, No.
David Ramos for sure possible but would be easier to stray with something more recently extinct like the passenger pigeon or dodo.
Saber tooth Cat*
According to the thumbnail, Thanos snapped his fingers and wiped out the woolly mammoths.
Huh. The more you know.
Turned out it might have been a comet.
"resurrects a mammoth*
Poacher: im about to end this mans whole career
Breaking news death penalty is now punishment of poaching
Exactly, if we did this poachers would go crazy
Hopefully the Europeans can ward them off, they hate poachers
Ass humans. Such a shit species
So, if we reintroduce a Mammoth into the wild, wouldn't that throw the ecosystem out of wack?
Eh, I think they'd just put them in a zoo, charge extra to see them, and let the cash flow in.
E Uncle Sam’s Secret to Success
If they release them into the wild. But they won't... Too valuable... Gotta make money on showing them in some kind of zoo. Jurassic Park style... until they break out and kill as all.
Well it’s still hell for the animal
@@steorbord
Sigh... Have you ever heard about natural reserves ?
The animal that really gets my attention is the tasmanian tiger
Its looks so amazing
Chemical Snorr even Steve Irwin believed it's still out there. Just look up the celocanth
They’re still around I bet
Fr
The tasmanian tiger they only have One video of it so that's why it was that specific vid
Chemical Snorr I love thos
Wild Dodo's...
*Nope, Pet Dodo's!*
or roasted Dodo's......again
@@nicolasceresoli9121 people said dodos tasted like shit, so it was an alteration on the environment that killed them
XD
Pet. Your. Mother
Tamed dodos
I'd love to see a Wooly Mammoth roaming our World.I'd SO go a trip to the Tundra just to see one.
Finally humans seeking for redemption. God bless this project💪👏
Yea because karma is catching up with them and now they feel sorry for wat they did don’t mess with karma
Thanos killing endangered species
TrashZoned Boi *Mr Homosapien I don't feel so good*
+no name 😂 rip
Space Jesters ...Did you watch Infinity War...?
The funniest line in this episode: “Mammophant, a name I hate”
Man inherits Earth
Brings back extinct Wooly Mammoth to life
Man extincts itself
Wooly Mammoth laughs about Man
Inherit earth? We aren't any better than any other extinct species. We eventually will die off. We may be the known brains of the universe but the universe doesn't owe us anything...
Then the mammoth make a movie about it 😆
@Super Franky not much smart thinker
Woman inherits the earth!
@@wokewaifu3955 maybe, maybe not we have something the other species dont have knowledge we know there is an universe out there and that will be our salvation if we dont kill ourselves with nukes (i wouldnt be surprised) humanity has a really good chance of surviving
*Scientists:* Hey we gonna bring mammoths back.
*Me:* (imagining) Riding a 8ton beast to school😏...quite the entrance.
its a lot more than 2 tons
@@dzgdzg6061 I wouldn't exactly research that just to make this comment. My best guess
@@ibrahimtarawally3897 nah i didnt research it
@@ibrahimtarawally3897 normal elephant weights 6 tons
@@ibrahimtarawally3897 so mammoth is lot more
If you put a mammoth back into Siberia not much of anything negative would happen.
Flournoy mason did you hear what he said about the wolfs
It would cause a loss of the boreal forests
Flournoy mason you really think those scientists are putting millions of dollars into these projects out of the kindness of their hearts??? That they are going to let it go. Hell no, they’re probably going to keep it in their lab and experiment and cross breed it.
@@queenspalace9582 I understand your point, indeed it wont be done from the kindness of anybodies heart, it's not how it works. But, are you suggesting that there wouldn't be any scientific purpose to putting them out into a specifically assigned natural habitat, to be able to intermingle again with the rest of the natural world around it?
What happens if they breed it, then would they consider a breeding programme or killing them off when there are too many.
The thing I'm alluding too is the snowball effect of doing this all research about mammoths for decades and having enough materials to make a mammoth, will it just spiral to a point where some team of people will eventually do it anyway just to watch and see, or for emotional purposes?
In a way the counter-argument to what I'm saying is similar to what the video says at 6:25 on-wards about if it's really the right thing to do. Two forces are at role here, Humanity's will and Natures will.
Personally though, I'm just not sure if it's the right thing to do. How mammoths became extinct could be entirely circumstantial, for a hypothetical example - ""10,000 years ago they could of died out to a small number from natural causes *and then* humans killed them because humans were too, on the brink of extinction and hunted these creatures to survive"" - then would we say "humans caused their extinction and thus need to replace them" or "Humans were playing an expected and predictable role in the ecosystem, thus it was only natural for mammoths to become extinct." - "Humans hunted these creatures but could not of been substantial enough to cause the final blow"
OR another hypothetical example to contrast the first one - ""10,000 years ago they became immediately extinct because of natural disasters and changing climates"" - Then it'd be that section from 6:25 - "is it right for nature?" or "is it right to do now, is it too late?"
- Until there is enough evidence to say exactly how the entire population of mammoths became extinct then it's pretty hard to say whether Humans should play a role in using science to bring these creatures back into the ecosystem. If there is even evidence left to prove it. Instead it's far more easier to record what is alive now, stop and replace the things we've brought to extinction, knowing full well we were responsible for something and that it wont screw up the ecosystem and even possibly the biosphere of bacterial life.
The whole reason the project of mammoths being brought back to life is to save siberia frim melting permafrost
Dodos need's to RETURN
The Gaming Snake I wonder how their meat tasted like
Not the same like original dodo!?
Yes
Why? It’s just a bird?
No Jurassic park:
*plays GOdzilla RoAr*
????
Official Mira Lol
*visible confusion*
So no jurassic park, but yes to a Godzilla
Godzilla for the win
I think we should focus on the animals that live today.
We're the only ones who can bring them back. We're the only ones who understand how to keep the environment safe and save animals. It's our responsibility. We owe them for what we did. And we can learn from it. And remember what had happened before us. Something that we never knew would happen.
Totally agree with you on that
Plenty of organizations doing that already. Scientists focus on different things.
they help fight climate change tho
How about we first protect the animals in the wild now because a lot of them are close to extinction because of poaching and hunting
Maha you know hunting is actually beneficial to species if don’t correctly right, poaching on the other hand is wrong no matter what. The difference being that one regulates animal population and the other takes more animals than necessary and sells them for profit.
How about we save their DNA, hunt them to extinction and then release like dinosaurs and shit, get them to breed then after that we hunt them to extinction and rinse and repeat? You know every 50 years or so to keep shit interesting.
Isn't that what we are trying to do?!
Jeff Solis How does hunting animals help their population?? Wtf
yes lets dedicate all of our scientists to have them go tiger taming
It’s so crazy how we are almost as useless as wasps
Wasp reduce some types of insects that feed on plants.
hydrolito oh wow that’s cool thanks dude
habboninjafoot619 you too 😉
Save the turtles wasps aren’t useless, they’re more hunter types, like spiders they keep the population of other creatures down, and some of them even pollinate just like bees, and humans aren’t useless sure we’ve done bad but think positive think of all the good, times cats have been attacked by dogs and have been saved by humans or apes have had diseases and worms in them and doctors have saved them, no animal could do some of these things themselves just saying
Mr Mister your right thanks for that 🙂
Comments:
90% I DONT FEEL SO GOOD
9% D I N O S
1% An actual comment
I thought you were justin
@@txicslzz6543 yes! I did too
Your justins brother
Casper😂😂?!?!
Other 100%: comments like this
I don't mean to sound like a rude person, but I recall stories being mentioned on cloning the Mammoth in 2002, when I was in Kindergarten. It's almost 2022, twenty years later. I just am really interested in realistic time frames...
Bringing back animals which went extinct a hundred years ago would very unlikely affect the environment that they originally lived in because it takes many thousands of years for creatures to adapt and evolve to a new environment.
evidence?
Yes but other animals have replaced it but I would love to see an adorable. Dodo waddling around
It would, actually, imagine putting a pack of saber tooth cats in Africa. That would DESTROY the food chain, because now Lions have new competitors. Same with Dire Wolves. They would not only push normal wolves out, but they would also destroy the herbivore species because they are much smaller prey than what they used to hunt
@@rileymercera6081 they said hundreds not thousands
They just need to speedrun that
Mammoth: I don't wanna go Mr Stark
Princhu Minhas agreed
Surely there will b a dinosaur completely preserved in ice somewhere on earth
well we didn't found one yet...
The Gypsy King That is possible and I bet there is but deep in the Earth somewhere
The Gypsy King it'll probably be a small dinosaur
Jamari Underwood has to be
You expect a cold blooded lizard roaming the ice desert?
I watched the documentary “Raising the Mammoths” on Discovery channel. Dr. Kazufumi Goto (I may have misspelled his name) was the lead scientist. I was about 15 when I watched the documentary. Now I am 35. Over 20 years and after millions of dollars dollars spent, there is no result. And all this for what? In the race of reviving extinct species, we as humans forgot to take care what we currently have.
Bring back humans
Yeah Let's bring back Neanthertals
edgy
And use them for what. They can’t talk and would be like us, but with a super severe Down syndrome.
@@thefortniteguy2235 We will put them in the zoo.
The are humans still and process emotions. They will still be by far the second smartest organism behind us. God don’t bring an innocent,creature to life for our amusement.
The real question is....
Can we bring sexy back?
Josh ....
no.
You are the reason Ajit Pai is killing our internet.
Josh 😂
And That’s the bottom line cuz stone cold
BOTTOM TEXT
Mr stark... i dont feel so good
Hahahaha godd one
I used to think mammoths were still a thing when I was little haha. I hope this actually happens, I love mammoths. Just a shame that we can’t bring dinosaurs back too :(
Bring back the extinct tigers and black and white rhinos before you bring back mammoths
King Tikitu THANK YOU! A very wise decision
King Tikitu no because the tigers and rhinos DNA is not to old but mammoth DNA is to old if we don't use it it will become useless
So were all at this side of TH-cam at 3 Am
The GRM yup
Yeah
4am here lol
Ya lol
The GRM get it right 3:09
what about the tasmanian tiger
I think they actually mention it under it's other name: Thylacine
Some say it's still out there....
A lot of scientists say that there still out there
Plenty of places to hide in Tasmania. The South West in particular.
Probably 90% sure they're still out there, numerous sightings every year.
Scientists: WE HAVE SUCCESSFULLY CREATED SUSTANIBLE POPULATIONS OF MAMMOTHS!
Zoos: here comes the moneyyyy
What tundra will they roam if global warming thaws it all out?
We will create a new tundra
They will come together and kill all humans and then a new species will become the humans
Factss
@@franklinarevalo8493 not if I get my hands on a flamethrower
They will likely be first released in Siberia in a national park called Pleistocene park, where they would actually be used to prevent permafrost from thawing by reestablishing and protecting the mammoth steppe
But the role the wooly mammoth played in the ecosystem hasn't been filled....
Many forests and grasslands of Siberia and north America have not been the same. People have to bulldoze forest lands and grass to let others grow. Theirs a park in Siberia made for that. It has bison, elk, moose, horse. And it's waiting for the mammoth. Then their they can release it and see what kind of impact it does.
Jack Leo the whole of Australia got turned into desert when we lost our large grazers. Some theorise we should bring elephants into the ecosystem to replace the lost megafauna.
An Aussie They actually introduced rhinos.
Jack Leo this is pop science. They try to make everything sound potential. Obviously it wont work due to less oxygen and different enviorments. These animal will become smaller than their ancestors and we would probably just make them to see how they taste and sell their meat for ridiculously high prices meh
Kevin SanMateo Wooly mammoths were the same size as African elephants.
Jack Leo tru tru
0:18 "but what if we could bring them back? What if extinction didn't have to be forever? We're going back in time on a safari with a difference, as wildlife adventurer Nigel Marven plunges into prehistory to rescue creatures on the brink of extinction. His plan is to bring them back to the saftey of the present and give them a second chance. Welcome to the ultimate wildlife sanctuary. Welcome to Prehistoric Park" Duh duuuuuuh du duuuuuuuuh du DUUUUUUUH DUUUUUUUH!
#NigelMarven #Primeval
Bro that shit's iconic
So many fuckin' memories
I loved that show! However, I always wondered whether many of those animals would even be able to live in today's climate. Arthropleura, for example, was around when the atmosphere was much richer in oxygen than it is today. Its great size means it probably wouldn't get enough oxygen to survive in the present day.
Tired of people asking if we should or shouldn’t. We won’t know unless we try.
Rare picture of the Siberian Mammoth not feeling so good
Why start with something so old when we could help bring back the species that are on the brink of extinction now or some of the more recently extinct animals instead? Seems weird to start with something so old, I'd think it would make more sense to start with animals that would be easier to determine what the impact on an ecosystem would be.
theres many big animals in the las 100ish years and atleast a thousand small ones, not to mention plants.
Because if the species is every old the DNA may be gone or missing.
mydyingparadiselost cy
mydyingparadiselost, that's actually what these scientist are doing in the first place. However, whenever someone mentions a mammoth, all attention is focused on that. The techniques presented in this video is, in the first place, being used to help modern day animals who are on the brink of extinction. Btw: What the video also fails to mention is that this research, in particular by "Restore&Revive" wasn't actually meant to be used in the de-extinction of the mammoth, but rather in possible genetical modification of the asian elephant, to make it more adepted to colder climates and as such, giving it more chance to survive . The media however popularised the concept and called it "the resurection of the mammoth", which i can understand, given the fact that they indeed try to give the asian elephant thick hair and fat.
Did you watch the video? They said we are not even able to do this yet but maybe in the next 10 years. The video also stated they should start off with something like the passenger pigeon, instead of a woolly mammoth. It also said just because they can do this, doesn't mean they will or should.
Leave them dead , and protect the endangered ones we got left , gonna mess with the predator and pray ecosystem we got now
Considering they were a positive effect for millions of years before we killed them, my guess is they will do just fine in our current ecosystem.
Introducing a new species to an environment could have many positive effects such as more trees, greener grass, more flourishing plant life, cleaner air, and different animals. But it could have negative effects like the opposite of the things I just listed. Like the guy said in the video, we need to know which species will have the greatest positive impact and focus on those first.
Why?
The smallest animal can have a huge impact. I agree. Stick with what we got
Again, researchers can multi task. Conserving animals existing today has moderate success but it's not perfect. So why not put new organisms to fill up that niche?
Yes we should if we can. The Wolfs in Yellowstone was a great thing! Very successful for the park! A few Mammoths in a designated area can be a site to behold! There are enormous areas in Russia that are completely empty, and they could eat all the grass they want over there.
Make Dinosaurs great again
You Got A New Editor Or Something?
Lol
Yeah it looks good or even better!
But different from the other videos
I noticed the difference too and I think it looks really good!
ScienceAIR cool 👍
Can we just de extinct the most recent animals that went extinct while their role is still in nature and is still there and not yet taken over by another.
That's actually a better idea. But how will we convince everyone?
@@kyled1673 we have to still convince anyone?.. I thought that was common knowledge.
@@gre3nishsinx0Rgold4 Because people are gonna want extinct animals like mammoths, sabers, etc. to come back so they can see something new. I think it is smarter to bring back the more recent animals because of their role in nature, but people want something new so they probably won't care.
Kyle D we made all the megafauna extinct so it’s our responsibility to bring them back, at least to a few arctic islands to see how they would do
It doesnt matter. Even if you brought them back they wouldnt refill their niche. They are taught their lifestyle and niche by thier parents and community. It would take a long time to teach them how to survive without other members of ots species to teach it. Look up this problem in newzealand with a bird species that was saved from extinction but no longer behaves like its ancestors but rather another bird species that scientists introduced them to.
Extinction: *Hi How Are Ya*
Extinction in the future: *Ight Imma Head Out*
Climate change: *Let me intruduce myself*
Although it's traditionally thought that passenger pigeons died because we killed them directly with hunting, is is unlikely this is the sole cause.
Based on genetic analysis it seems that the minimum genetically self-sustaining population of passenger pigeons (which once numbered in the billions) was only about 330,000.
www.theguardian.com/science/grrlscientist/2014/jun/16/passenger-pigeon-extinction-population-fluctuations-human-exploitation
Environmental changes wrought by European settlers possibly coupled with the chestnut blight (American chestnuts were a big food source for passenger pigeons) may have produced a huge population boom followed by a massive die-off. That is the billions of passenger pigeons darkening the skies may not have been the norm, but a population explosion produced when Europeans turned virgin, unbroken forests into patchwork forests.
Then when the population crashed from billions to a more normal amount (let's say millions), but people kept hunting them as though billions was the norm, it was the last nail in the coffin. That's one theory that's circulating anyhow.
Another theory is that passenger pigeon flocks had to be huge or they'd go extinct. That is they weren't hunted to extinction, but the flock sizes were reduced to what most people would consider quite sustainable numbers, but which unfortunately weren't.
They need to figure out how to keep the animals we got today alive before they start thinking about bringing something extinct
HINGLE McCRINGLEBERRY, Exactly like even cloning more of today’s animals like tigers and rhinos that are almost extinct would be smart
@@subsWithnovideos-ib3pq Cloned animals have a very low fertility rate
Mattis Fatha, so? Doesn’t mean it won’t help
I see that the sabertooth tiger keeps popping up in the video, how about we don't bring those back?
How about do! Predators make the best pets!
A lot of animals that became extinct because humans being human(hunting,irrational fear when the animals wasn’t even a threat)probably deserve the number one spot
When I die I want to be cloned
K H but your soul is in heaven
just because we can, doesnt mean we should ;D
Kuang Cheng Besides they are finding out that cloned dogs have different personalities then the original. Cloning humans is just gonna end in disaster
Don't be silly! Your personality and your memory die with your body. When you die YOU cease to exist. The cloned one is a totally different person. Just think about identical twins.
Or you could just get laid and have some kids like a normal creature would.
WE SHOULD!
At least most of them...
Because it isnt fair! Humans did this!! And now we need to fix it...
Uncle Snowman, yes but also considering earth has changed so much overtime for an example global warming. Releasing mammoths in the wild might not be a very good idea considering their habitat is getting hotter and hotter as global warming continues.
But it would make sense to bring back things like the passenger pigeon
Sure. Stone age man drove them to extinction.
Lets work on making mosquitoes extinct
mike jones I hate the bleeders but they are an important part of the ecosystem.
But why? Mosquitos keep us in check. We need to cull some of these humans.
mike jones thats the only extinction i agree
Bats will have a major famine
Mosquito is one of the hardest species to be extinct next to micro organisms but i like that idea
Scientists: brings Mammoths back into this world
People: hunts them back into extinction
Mammoths: *Ah shit, here we go again*
Could you not create large drive through reserves to house the resurrected species?
Charge people to visit so that you can use the revenue to continue your work.
That way they would be in a controlled environment and would have a much lesser impact on local ecosystems, all the while you're preserving one of the amazing creatures who once roamed this Earth.
Let's get this post seen eh?
Indeed I think plenty would pay good money to see a living mammoth.
Mammoth: I don't feel so good
me nether
Keaton Blackman neither
Lol
0:55 "Sid I don't feel so good"
It would be better to work on keeping threatened species from becoming extinct. Such as rhinoceroses, whooping cranes, a whole range of animals and plants. If the ecosystems that mammoths lived in are gone, it might not be possible to find a territory where they could survive. The end of the ice age made the solid land that they could walk on previously soft, and they sunk into mud and could not get out. Now the warming of the atmosphere might reduce the amount of land they could live on.
Making one or two passenger pigeons do not make de-extinction. How many do we need to clone to get a stabel healthy population?
Petch85 They breed them..
That is my point. You ned dna diversity to avoid in breading. Thus. How many do we need to clone to get a stable healthy population? And can we ensure genetic variation?
I believe the general rule of thumb for humans is 50 human males and 50 human females, so I can only assume you would need a minimum of the same amount to have a population of passenger pigeons with enough genetic variation.
It's not just cloning, but also selective gene editing that makes de-extinction plausible. So options may be to artificially introduce signifigant genetic variation to a population, or to remove perceived detrimental recessives.
+nmcguireable
Yes 100 is enough if you selecting the mates. And from there you might be able to breed the birds until you have enough to release the into the wild. Maybe. But that is still finding 100 useful DNA samples of passenger pigeons.
Honestly global warming would probably kill off the mammoths again
Unlikely
S
Or mammoths can be genetically modified to not have wool fur and adapt to warmer climates. How come no one thinks this?
Not on siperia
Or they would just lose their wool...again.
De-Extinction is good if we choose right one for us . For example elephant bird . If we recreate them then we don't need to kill 50 chicken for its meat , but we need only to kill "one" elephant bird to produce that much meat . I mean meat industry is huge . We need to reintroduce certain extinct species for our huge meat demands
Sorry to burst your bubble but elephant birds would likey reproduce far more slowly than a chicken and thus not really be tenable for farming in a comparable manner.
The thing is tho, that we are allready producing to much meat, because the overall consumption of meat is actually decreasing. We throw tons and tons of meat away every year. So why do we need even more of it? And yes we do need more meat in the third world countries to help them with their hunger, but that can be fixed by redistribution.
Who says they taste good
I love how they shut out the dino talk at the beginning.
I love how I thought I would understand this video
T Dog 😂
Mammoth - "I don't feel so good"
You say we can't bring back dinosaurs now but wait until the time machine is invented.
But dinosaurs never died out
Yea boi
JayD 05 wdym never died out
Sorry what does wdym mean
I'm waiting for it
Wooly mammoth in the thumbnail: “I feel great!!”