My god, what a specialist the Prokhorovka-Bourrasque was. You can see the eastern flank is going down and he does not bother to support, even by spotting.
Considering I usually play lights, the rarity of getting Prok is astonishing - only averaging something like 4times/week, compared to Siegfried Line, at 6times/day.
18:20 rinoceronte in this kind of situation (farming easy targets) is in same time best tank and the worst . Best because it has accurate gun, good penetration and shell velocity. Worst because reload time. Progetto 66 is not so bad because it has 10-12s reload, rinoceronte has 12-17 around.
I use the churchhill 3 for the daily missions like be the top player with experience earned. The tank is slow, but I just load the gold when needed and lock on and keep firing. It can melt tanks so fast
Because of the Redshire I turned off assault mode after 7 yrs of playing... I know Skill promoted Assault Mode several vids ago (make game different, explore new ways etc.), man there is no "fun factor" in constant spawn on a loosing side in Assault mode and the Redshire was top of the BS pile of the ALL imbalances!
In last game I prefer the defending battle. If your team is smart enough to secure the A3, K3 and spot the middle you will win the battle by killing them all.
I prefer the 4 shot 105mm gun on this tank. Faster reload. You can fire 2 shots and reload them fairly quickly. I keep the 3rd and 4th shots in the magazine for emergencies
Due to Skill4ltu, I now consider myself an above average WOT player. Even though a F2P player I no longer feel diminished. I have "skill" on my side. 😎
Redshire was already tilted before this new mode was in place, at least the map was an even 50/50 territory split. In this new mode, offensive team starts with a 60/40 territory and just better angles. It’s just lazy!
A Question- How can I be low tier like 70% of the time? Who get's to be high tier 70% of the time? Matchmaking is making me fairly useless in most matches. Very frustrating.
Depends on a lot 1 of all 70% of what, 7of 10( statistically useless) or 70 of 100. 2 What tier, what tank, what time you play. 3 If you have bad MM change tier( get lower is usually better) and type of tank and try other server.
@@Ol_White_Fatalis I generally play tiers 5 and 6. When I play my 7 and 8s I'm going up against 9 and 10s and between needing to spam gold and expensive repairs it's just too costly to play there, I haven't done a statistical analysis of where each tier falls as far as the matchmaking goes. Is 7 better than 6? I couldn't tell. When I am high tier, it's awesome, but even being a the same tier as everyone else is pretty rare. I do like the game, despite the wheeled lights and oppressive arties, but if there was one thing that makes me quit it's the 3 tier spread and usually being at the bottom.
@@yanickgenest1324 I think the other gun has higher pen and a four shot clip. I've got this tank but have yet to play a match in it. I'm working on another tier IX atm, but this is next on my list.
I like the Prog66 but get better results in the Prog54 which I have 2-marked. Maybe I should use the bigger gun but I like the extra pen and Italian tanks always seem to miss one shot in the magazine, so starting with 4 seems better than starting with 3
You willingly hinder yourself. First, to do close damage to 3 shells from 120mm gun, you have to empty 105mm gun. Which both takes longer time to shot 4 shells and longer reload. Add here difference in normalisation between standard shells of both guns, which effectively places them on same level with 120mm going ahead on distances. And OFC damage per shot advantage of 120mm gun is one of most important things for HT. Better chances to finish enemy, bigger "fear factor", more efficient trades and lesser chances to receive damage by reducing time and amount of your peekings
@@njc964 i've just gave short list of obvious advantages that you get with top gun. 105mm gun is just XP sink for clueless players. Ppl look at it and think - cool, 4 shot clip. They ignore worse DPM, worse time unload, worse damage per shot; thinking about it as a classic autoloader on fast chassis. But it is just mobile heavy tank who has to rely on bigger gun to play to its fullest. You can check what players are using to mark it, what gun was used in record score battles etc.
@@KellPerEX I am not a clueless player so maybe ease off the insults. The smaller gun has better pen (unless you are a pay to win gold spammer) and dispersion so will score damage on average more often. Many excellent players will choose the smaller gun on many tanks so the subject is nuanced. If you are pay to win stat padder then yes bigger gun may be better. I will try bigger gun though because the Prog54 is better tier-for-tier (in my opinion) and it currently feels pointless playing the Prog66
@@njc964 can you show that "many excellent player" you are referring to? Also, shooting premium ammo is not P2W (because anyone can buy it for in-game currency), so this is just pathetic to justify your poor choice of gun
it is not what the player can do but it is all up to wargaming if you allowed to win or it is already decided you loose the battle.. it seems wargaming is cheating on players by manipulating the battle outcome... sad t
@@yanickgenest1324 I like the accuracy and extra shell and better penetration on the standard rounds. But I don't think I've properly played the 120mm.
Progetto 66 is the tank I use when the daily missions require that I "destroy [x] number of tanks" in a single battle.
My god, what a specialist the Prokhorovka-Bourrasque was. You can see the eastern flank is going down and he does not bother to support, even by spotting.
This tank was absolutely amazing. Beautiful looking too. If only it was a bit faster. It seemed like the gun never missed!
Considering I usually play lights, the rarity of getting Prok is astonishing - only averaging something like 4times/week, compared to Siegfried Line, at 6times/day.
Exactly, somehow prokho is very rare.
18:20 rinoceronte in this kind of situation (farming easy targets) is in same time best tank and the worst . Best because it has accurate gun, good penetration and shell velocity. Worst because reload time. Progetto 66 is not so bad because it has 10-12s reload, rinoceronte has 12-17 around.
I use the churchhill 3 for the daily missions like be the top player with experience earned. The tank is slow, but I just load the gold when needed and lock on and keep firing. It can melt tanks so fast
Great games like always 👍 and by the way your recording got a bit quiter at 8:12
Trueee and I was like
Did my phone died? 😅
Because of the Redshire I turned off assault mode after 7 yrs of playing...
I know Skill promoted Assault Mode several vids ago (make game different, explore new ways etc.), man there is no "fun factor" in constant spawn on a loosing side in Assault mode and the Redshire was top of the BS pile of the ALL imbalances!
In last game I prefer the defending battle. If your team is smart enough to secure the A3, K3 and spot the middle you will win the battle by killing them all.
I prefer the 4 shot 105mm gun on this tank. Faster reload. You can fire 2 shots and reload them fairly quickly. I keep the 3rd and 4th shots in the magazine for emergencies
Same, prefer the four round gun
This is a great video. I returned to Progetto 66 after finishing grinding other tanks and picked up a couple of tips Skillman. This helped!
Due to Skill4ltu, I now consider myself an above average WOT player.
Even though a F2P player I no longer feel diminished.
I have "skill" on my side. 😎
QB 20 minute video: one battle
Skill 20 minute video: three battles
In regards to the 3rd game. At least WG will move the base closer to the attackers again. So it will be impossible to do anything on def.
I started up the Italian line. P43 is boss, 78% win rate in it.
I love the Pantera and Standard, but the P43 is pretty good too 👍
This tank is the highlight of the line imo. Its a fun tank.
Redshire was already tilted before this new mode was in place, at least the map was an even 50/50 territory split.
In this new mode, offensive team starts with a 60/40 territory and just better angles. It’s just lazy!
that tank is not op not bad, just a fun tank to play, and that help a lot
My favourite vehicle. Just amazing!
Rinoceronte needs more attention than Progetto 66.
I am grinding to 66 and currently in 54. I do like their depression, aiming time and DPM? not so much.
Love it thank you skill
I love PROG 66 with 2nd gun (4 shells), big surprise for ennemy after 3 shoot fired :)
big brain
Not a surprise for any player with just a bit of experience, 320 alpha is quite noticiable lol.
Glad to see you get matches like the rest of us
A Question- How can I be low tier like 70% of the time? Who get's to be high tier 70% of the time? Matchmaking is making me fairly useless in most matches. Very frustrating.
Depends of what tier you play, 6s and 8s get mid or bottom tier most of the time.
Depends on a lot
1 of all 70% of what, 7of 10( statistically useless) or 70 of 100.
2 What tier, what tank, what time you play.
3 If you have bad MM change tier( get lower is usually better) and type of tank and try other server.
@@Ol_White_Fatalis I generally play tiers 5 and 6. When I play my 7 and 8s I'm going up against 9 and 10s and between needing to spam gold and expensive repairs it's just too costly to play there, I haven't done a statistical analysis of where each tier falls as far as the matchmaking goes. Is 7 better than 6? I couldn't tell. When I am high tier, it's awesome, but even being a the same tier as everyone else is pretty rare. I do like the game, despite the wheeled lights and oppressive arties, but if there was one thing that makes me quit it's the 3 tier spread and usually being at the bottom.
RNG without random, premium ammo as a credit drain and a matchmaker for premium tanks.
Skill, when the patch 1.18 will be On?
why 4 heats?
Oh yeah. I like this tank. But I prefer the other gun If I remember correctly. 🙃
Never tried it. What do you like about it compared with the high alpha gun ? I guess I'll have to give it a try...
@@yanickgenest1324 I think the other gun has higher pen and a four shot clip. I've got this tank but have yet to play a match in it. I'm working on another tier IX atm, but this is next on my list.
@@felbombling3199 Yup. Better penetration and 4 in the clip. I kinda like this better.
Hey skill! I was your buddy, the VZ 55 on serene coast xD It was my pleasure to serve by your side master!
funny enough I paused the video to check if you were in the comments. XD
@@nong8191 how could I miss this 😄
@Skieell Hii King baboon, hope ur well. I see we never had a YT vid of LHMTV tier8 light. Really hope to see u play sneaky british lights :D
Honestly this tank is better than rinoceronte s super long reload
This tank is great once you have it fully upgraded. Painful stock.
im pretty sure the burrasque in the first game is a bot
gud daj fellaz
I like the Prog66 but get better results in the Prog54 which I have 2-marked. Maybe I should use the bigger gun but I like the extra pen and Italian tanks always seem to miss one shot in the magazine, so starting with 4 seems better than starting with 3
You willingly hinder yourself. First, to do close damage to 3 shells from 120mm gun, you have to empty 105mm gun. Which both takes longer time to shot 4 shells and longer reload. Add here difference in normalisation between standard shells of both guns, which effectively places them on same level with 120mm going ahead on distances. And OFC damage per shot advantage of 120mm gun is one of most important things for HT. Better chances to finish enemy, bigger "fear factor", more efficient trades and lesser chances to receive damage by reducing time and amount of your peekings
@@KellPerEX I think you are over simplifying by basically saying “you will win more often by using bigger gun”. I am not sure that is true.
@@njc964 i've just gave short list of obvious advantages that you get with top gun. 105mm gun is just XP sink for clueless players. Ppl look at it and think - cool, 4 shot clip. They ignore worse DPM, worse time unload, worse damage per shot; thinking about it as a classic autoloader on fast chassis. But it is just mobile heavy tank who has to rely on bigger gun to play to its fullest. You can check what players are using to mark it, what gun was used in record score battles etc.
@@KellPerEX I am not a clueless player so maybe ease off the insults. The smaller gun has better pen (unless you are a pay to win gold spammer) and dispersion so will score damage on average more often. Many excellent players will choose the smaller gun on many tanks so the subject is nuanced. If you are pay to win stat padder then yes bigger gun may be better. I will try bigger gun though because the Prog54 is better tier-for-tier (in my opinion) and it currently feels pointless playing the Prog66
@@njc964 can you show that "many excellent player" you are referring to? Also, shooting premium ammo is not P2W (because anyone can buy it for in-game currency), so this is just pathetic to justify your poor choice of gun
Tier for Tier worse than Tier 8 Heavy.
I like this matchmkaing
sKiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiill you have no video of GSOR3301 AVR FS
The tier 8 (prog 54) is so bad, I don't start to play tier 9 yet
From what I have heard the tier 10 version is far worse for it's tier.
What?! Prog 54 and 66 are good, not decent but still good. Rino is the only problem on Italian HT.
Heck, many prefer Prog 54 than Bisonte.
prog 54 is gud
🙏
ggs
Matchmkaing
Day 4 of asking for GSOR or LHMTV video since LHMTV video was like years ago. I mean it was british light tanks showcase so that doesnt even count.
Day 9 of asking for AMBT final opinion video
it is not what the player can do but it is all up to wargaming if you allowed to win or it is already decided you loose the battle.. it seems wargaming is cheating on players by manipulating the battle outcome... sad t
They cannot do that to you, if you wear a tinfoil hat.
Just try it. It works.
hi Skill, your videos are interesting but your repetitive speech is getting really annoying sometimes
I prefer the 4 shot gun, anyone else?
It is better than the tier 10 gun on paper, but in battle the 3 shot 120mm gun is far better.
@@killertruth186 I might try it again then, thanks.
Never tried it. What do you like about it ?
I thought it was not good.
@@yanickgenest1324 I like the accuracy and extra shell and better penetration on the standard rounds. But I don't think I've properly played the 120mm.
@@t1ghe If I remember correctly, the aiming time is worse. But maybe it's not much of a problem.