I am using Anycubic Kobra 2 Neo with 0.4 mm nozzle and to achieve round hole with diameter of lets say 8 mm then I am over sizing it by 0.4 mm in PLA and 0.6 in PETG. It always fits very well. For this in fusion 360 i use parametric design where i can always put oversize factor just with one parameter. One profit from this is that I can instantly align the body to the manufacturing method.
How about after XY Compensation we resize the object only to X and Y dimensions with the same number we used in XY Compensation. Wouldn't this get us back to the original external dimensions?
This is really the biggest catch that prevent me from using Prusa slicer. The hole size can be compensated only for holes if you use Cura hole size compensation. Sli3er (before it becomes Prusaslicer) also has a hole size compensation but Prusaslicer cut it off for some reason. That makes it pretty much only good for figurine foe me.
Your suggestion of increasing the hole sizes with 0.175 mm is based on the nozzle size I assume (0.4 maybe)? How did you get to this number? And what should it be with a larger nozzle 0.8 for instance?
I am using 0.4 nozzle and for this size I am oversizing my holes by this value (0.2 on one side * 2) for PLA. For PETG I am oversizing by 0.6 mm. Works well. Using parametric design in Fusion360 so I can modify it comfortably for all project. Those values was achieved by experimenting with my printer (Anycubic Kobra 2 Neo)
Solution: Just stop using prusa crasher. Cura has a "hole horizontal expansion" setting that makes this entire video obsolete. Holes to small by 0.5mm? Set it to 0.25mm and call it a day, you'll have perfect inside diameters every single time. And the new 5.0 now also has variable line width which is a MAJOR game changer. It has improved dimensional accuracy of my prints AND the strength AND the quality, all in one. It has also reduced the amount I need to use for the horizontal expansion setting simply because of the new variable line width addition.
recomendacion ver el video en 1.5 de velocidad, habla muy lento, jajaj el contenido es excelente, saludos
cierto y funciona! haha!
I am using Anycubic Kobra 2 Neo with 0.4 mm nozzle and to achieve round hole with diameter of lets say 8 mm then I am over sizing it by 0.4 mm in PLA and 0.6 in PETG. It always fits very well. For this in fusion 360 i use parametric design where i can always put oversize factor just with one parameter. One profit from this is that I can instantly align the body to the manufacturing method.
How about after XY Compensation we resize the object only to X and Y dimensions with the same number we used in XY Compensation. Wouldn't this get us back to the original external dimensions?
5:15 is the answer
2x speed recommended
You sir are the real MVP
This is really the biggest catch that prevent me from using Prusa slicer. The hole size can be compensated only for holes if you use Cura hole size compensation. Sli3er (before it becomes Prusaslicer) also has a hole size compensation but Prusaslicer cut it off for some reason. That makes it pretty much only good for figurine foe me.
Your suggestion of increasing the hole sizes with 0.175 mm is based on the nozzle size I assume (0.4 maybe)?
How did you get to this number? And what should it be with a larger nozzle 0.8 for instance?
Just print a sample and test it
I am using 0.4 nozzle and for this size I am oversizing my holes by this value (0.2 on one side * 2) for PLA. For PETG I am oversizing by 0.6 mm. Works well. Using parametric design in Fusion360 so I can modify it comfortably for all project. Those values was achieved by experimenting with my printer (Anycubic Kobra 2 Neo)
does not have this on prusa slicer anymore..
Solution: Just stop using prusa crasher. Cura has a "hole horizontal expansion" setting that makes this entire video obsolete. Holes to small by 0.5mm? Set it to 0.25mm and call it a day, you'll have perfect inside diameters every single time. And the new 5.0 now also has variable line width which is a MAJOR game changer. It has improved dimensional accuracy of my prints AND the strength AND the quality, all in one. It has also reduced the amount I need to use for the horizontal expansion setting simply because of the new variable line width addition.
get to the point already