An unmodified Evoque with a driver who obviously doesn't know how to off road and stock road biased tyres kept up with a modified duster with mud tyres. Just put some mud terrain tyres on the Evoque and a more competent driver and it will beat the Duster
@@mikeb53 Driving on street tyres is a grievous mistake according to me. The least the driver could do is to install some more aggressive AT tyres (unless specified all Land Rovers come with some form of AT tyres from the factory)
@@LordTechPro all terrain or mud terrain tyres and smaller rims cost a quite a lot of money. I bought a set of compomotive pd1881 18" rims for my disco 4 and some cooper st max tyres... that package set me back nearly £2000 GBPs. Unless you're going to drive off road regularly a tyre and rim change to that effect is not worth the money. In any case I thought the range rover ejoke driver did quite well considering their car was totally stock.
@@mikeb53 AT tyres are worth the money though. Since they use harder rubber they are much more durable than HT tyres and because they also have a deeper tread they last for longer. Not only that the latest AT tyres such as the Pirelli Scorpions have a more balanced tread pattern which can reduce the noise and rolling resistance AT tyres are known for. Otherwise you can spec your Land Rover to have even more caressive AT tyres from the factory (though you won't really need it). Mud terrain tyres are basically useless if you only go off roading once a year or so. All I'm saying is that since you shouldn't drive on summer tyres during the winter when the roads are icy or packed with snow, the same should apply for mud and ruts. You think the Duster had highway tyres? It looked like it was lifted and had AT or MT tyres fitted to it.
@@LordTechPro Land Rovers don't come with AT tyres from factory , except Defender. On the video , mine were ATs but pretty much worn out 50 % by that time. And not aggressive thread at all.
Let's face it the Duster is cheap & cheerful & the driver went for it coz he couldn't be arsed about it. The land Rover is worth twice as much thats why he was so cautious I would be crap idea anyway
Look , you can make any point of it , and I could have diverted you to any point with my edit of this video . For example I could show you several attempts that Dacia had before a succesfull climb of that hill . And I could show you just this single succesfull climb of that Evoque. This would've mislead you in the other direction . While in fact the point is , that this hill was a little demanding to both cars and you could not make it slowely. A little kinetic energy was required , as was presented with the Evoque attempts without any cuts. Also - both cars are modified , but Duster is changed havier. Evouque has a slight lift and worn out AT tyres, skid plate under the engine , and CB radio. The Duster's driver was keen on bashing the car all over the forest , which was not the case for Evoque's driver. Take care.
Some of these off road videos are sort of ridiculous fit the two cars with the same off road tyres and let's all see their capabilities...the Range was struggling for nothing because of bad tyres and a little blame goes to the driver too.
The Duster was struggling too. I did not show all the attempts Duster had , before it climbed. With that little throttle at first I was testing the hill , the traction and the AWD system, which might have been a little heated at that time. Thanks for your comment.
@@pugmug77 A version with long wheelbase, named B0 platform since 2004, and developed by Renault/Dacia. Dacia Logan Dacia Sandero Dacia Duster (HS) Dacia Duster II (HM) Renault Arkana (Russia) Renault Captur/Kaptur (Global Access) Nissan Kicks (D15)[7]
Its all about tyres , put HTs on the duster , its a bucket of shit , put MTs on the Evoque , even with its novice driver , it will eat the duster for breakfast !
Tak, żaden nie ma sztywnych blokad dyferencjałów. Nawet centralnego. Ale, choć są to dwa różne systemy napędowe, to są podobieństwa. Blokada międzyosiowa zachodzi, ale jest uślizna - na sprzęgłach. Blokada na osiach nie występuje, zamiast tego przyblokowywane są koła przez hamulce - sterownik podobny do ABS.
Old off roader once said..if you want to drive into the desert buy s land rover..if you want to drive out by a Toyota. No. I've used both these cars and while the evoque is very nice it broke down 6 times in 8 months..the duster is 4 years old and never missed a beat.
Mam 2.0 benzyna. Nie ma problemu z awaryjnością , o ile masz pieniądze. A żartując mniej, to są dostępne zamienniki, dość tanie, a serwisy można znaleźć, które się specjalizują w Land Roverach. Czy się coś psuje ? Silnik nie, zawieszenie - bajka - 10 lat i nic nie stuka. Amortyzatory tylko wymieniałem. Jakieś drobne rzeczy, typu zamek drzwi, czy teraz sensory parktronic , były wymieniane. Trochę pali, jak każda benzyna turbo - wtrysk jest wykorzystywany do chłodzenia bloku. Jedyną rzeczą, którą można tam wtrysnąć, to jest paliwo, które rozpraszając się - chłodzi. To jest przypadłość wszystkich silników turbo benz. Ja to auto mam dalej, czyli wytrzymuję wszystkie trudy, a co najważniejsze - jest , kiedy go potrzebuję. Nigdy nie było zepsute, wsiadam i jadę. Tak samo było podczas wypraw overlandowych. Nie zawodził.
@@kamillop.7842 Teraz mam około 145 tys, km . Nie, kolektora nie wymieniałem, ale miałem już raz wymieniony moduł turbo - może o to Ci chodzi? Na taki sam , fabryczny, bo stary świszczał. To było na gwarancji, a do teraz problem nie wraca. Poza tym , teraz wymieniałem cały rozrząd, ale auto ma już 10 lat życia.
@@mortyebaniec5340 Przy okazji sprawdz czy nie masz przedmuchu, kolektory sa wykoanane z SS ale pekaja na spawach mocowania i przedmuch powoduje wpadanie spalin do kabiny a takze moze spowodować slaba prace turbo o ryzyku pozaru nie wspominajac. JA juz mialem z tym problem przy 75kkm przebiegu, kupujac nie zauwazylem tego problemu i musialem wymieniac ale juz wsadzilem zeliwny. Tam jest lancuch, juz przy 145kkm musiales wymienieniac ? Masz wersje 2.0T, dobrze kojarze ? Pozdrawiam
@@kamillop.7842 Poprzedni moduł turbo miał przedmuch , czyli świst. Ten po wymianie tego nie ma. Znam zjawisko i czułbym smród w kabinie. Jeśli chodzi o rozrząd, to tak, jest tam łańcuch , a nawet dwa. Wyminiłem całość , łącznie z zębatkami . Z jednej z nich, tej od wałka zaworów (podójna faza rozrządu) - wypadła jakaś sprężynka i tulejka . Wpadło to niżej , zwisło gdzieś na bloku i powodowało hałas przy rozruchu. A potem, przestawiły mi się fazy rozrządu, ale silnik ocalał. Mam 2.0 benzyna. Pozdro.
evoque de asfalt lastiği var ve yükseltmede yok ama yine de dusterın gittiği yerlerden gidebiliyor.. kaldı ki evoque bir off road aracı değil.. defender yada discovery ile karşılaştırmak daha doğru olur.. ve dusterın onlara karşı hiç şansı yok.. ama fiyatına göre duster oldukça yetenekli bir araç.. bizde kullanıyoruz ve memnunuz.. ama doğru bir karşılaştırma olmamış
We tested Evoque vs Duster (and Freelander, Tiguan, X-Trail etc) It was basically unanimous. The Evoque is way superior off road. Here's the video: th-cam.com/video/v9txVtgfbhQ/w-d-xo.html
Yes I have come across your videos in the past , and I was not suprised with what I saw. Evoque wins in off-roading with all middle market SUVs, and even its legacy Freelander 2. Its is better . I took it to many places and did plenty of overlanding in it with a bigger fellow cars in convoy. It did extremely well. I have recorded many shots but have not done videos yet. Maybe I will to prove the point.
No, it wasn't easy go Duster. It had many attempts too, which were not shown. The Evoque's run is uncut, gently approached the obstacle to test if there is enough clearance.
These are General Grabber AT3 . They are good , quite and gripy. Maybe less in ice-packed snow, especially when they are worn out a bit. But I will buy them again this year before winter.
Mud & Ruts, bro. Working good. Suspension stiffens (I have Adaptive Dynamic - mangneride). Rear axle is more enganged in this mode straight from the start. See last take of is done by the rear wheels mainly. Notice if front spins. Not at all.
This is not justify because of in duster putting load on back side of car so car get much stable and loaded so easy to climb... And other side evoque nothing so it's unfair comparison
Hi Kichu, yeah now that I think of it , maybe. I promise my next video will be putting the Evoque in a better picture. Because it is a great car, from owners perspective. And can do demanding off-roading.
![ทุกครั้งที่หลับตา (Lucid Dream) - AYLA's [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4i1OBAQyv58/mqdefault.jpg)
![[ ออกกอง ] วัยหนุ่ม 2544 โลกหลังลูกกรง..ทัวร์กองถ่ายหนังใน "คุกของจริง" | JUSTดูIT.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vB--aOkZCpw/mqdefault.jpg)
Evoque with road tyres...nice comparison xdxx
Ahhh come on don’t compare iphone with Nokia😑
An unmodified Evoque with a driver who obviously doesn't know how to off road and stock road biased tyres kept up with a modified duster with mud tyres. Just put some mud terrain tyres on the Evoque and a more competent driver and it will beat the Duster
I didnt see any grievous mistakes on his part. Sometimes even the most experienced off road drivers will make a trial and error approach.
@@mikeb53 Driving on street tyres is a grievous mistake according to me. The least the driver could do is to install some more aggressive AT tyres (unless specified all Land Rovers come with some form of AT tyres from the factory)
@@LordTechPro all terrain or mud terrain tyres and smaller rims cost a quite a lot of money. I bought a set of compomotive pd1881 18" rims for my disco 4 and some cooper st max tyres... that package set me back nearly £2000 GBPs. Unless you're going to drive off road regularly a tyre and rim change to that effect is not worth the money.
In any case I thought the range rover ejoke driver did quite well considering their car was totally stock.
@@mikeb53 AT tyres are worth the money though. Since they use harder rubber they are much more durable than HT tyres and because they also have a deeper tread they last for longer. Not only that the latest AT tyres such as the Pirelli Scorpions have a more balanced tread pattern which can reduce the noise and rolling resistance AT tyres are known for.
Otherwise you can spec your Land Rover to have even more caressive AT tyres from the factory (though you won't really need it).
Mud terrain tyres are basically useless if you only go off roading once a year or so.
All I'm saying is that since you shouldn't drive on summer tyres during the winter when the roads are icy or packed with snow, the same should apply for mud and ruts. You think the Duster had highway tyres? It looked like it was lifted and had AT or MT tyres fitted to it.
@@LordTechPro Land Rovers don't come with AT tyres from factory , except Defender. On the video , mine were ATs but pretty much worn out 50 % by that time. And not aggressive thread at all.
Who let him drive that Range Rover
Bro you comparing a handicap with usain bolt.. lol 😂
Super...
Exactly bro. Having some commonsence
I think I would rather have the evoque.
Of course you have to be very careful with the Evoque in the woods, it costs you a Duster's worth to repair a scratch :))
Yeah, that is true , but I already lost it. There are scratches all over the car , and I even stopped bothering now.
I am real lover of range rover
Let's face it the Duster is cheap & cheerful & the driver went for it coz he couldn't be arsed about it. The land Rover is worth twice as much thats why he was so cautious I would be crap idea anyway
More like 3x as much for an Evoque. Even a 2014 is still £22k £10k for a new duster and £30k for an evoque
Not mentioning the duster had proper mud tires while the evoque had road tires..
So the point here is even without any modification and without any skill , one can easily off-road Evoque 👍
Look , you can make any point of it , and I could have diverted you to any point with my edit of this video . For example I could show you several attempts that Dacia had before a succesfull climb of that hill . And I could show you just this single succesfull climb of that Evoque. This would've mislead you in the other direction . While in fact the point is , that this hill was a little demanding to both cars and you could not make it slowely. A little kinetic energy was required , as was presented with the Evoque attempts without any cuts. Also - both cars are modified , but Duster is changed havier. Evouque has a slight lift and worn out AT tyres, skid plate under the engine , and CB radio. The Duster's driver was keen on bashing the car all over the forest , which was not the case for Evoque's driver. Take care.
Some of these off road videos are sort of ridiculous fit the two cars with the same off road tyres and let's all see their capabilities...the Range was struggling for nothing because of bad tyres and a little blame goes to the driver too.
What did the driver do wrong?
The Duster was struggling too. I did not show all the attempts Duster had , before it climbed. With that little throttle at first I was testing the hill , the traction and the AWD system, which might have been a little heated at that time. Thanks for your comment.
Unfair comparisson againts Evoque. Obviously you put the vehicle to unfavourable start conditions!
Some off road tyres on the Evoque would wipe out the duster ,still duster not bad for a lifted Clio.
Clio is not a 4x4 drive car !!!
Same platform as a clio .
@@pugmug77 A version with long wheelbase, named B0 platform since 2004, and developed by Renault/Dacia.
Dacia Logan
Dacia Sandero
Dacia Duster (HS)
Dacia Duster II (HM)
Renault Arkana (Russia)
Renault Captur/Kaptur (Global Access)
Nissan Kicks (D15)[7]
Its all about tyres , put HTs on the duster , its a bucket of shit , put MTs on the Evoque , even with its novice driver , it will eat the duster for breakfast !
What tires are being used ? In most case it's the most important part...
Evoque has 50% worn out General Grabber AT3 255/55R19 , Duster has Nokian Novitta 225/75R16 also AT all year tyres.
Obydwa samochody miały system ESP z protezą blokad mechanizmów różnicowych?
Tak, żaden nie ma sztywnych blokad dyferencjałów. Nawet centralnego. Ale, choć są to dwa różne systemy napędowe, to są podobieństwa. Blokada międzyosiowa zachodzi, ale jest uślizna - na sprzęgłach. Blokada na osiach nie występuje, zamiast tego przyblokowywane są koła przez hamulce - sterownik podobny do ABS.
Old off roader once said..if you want to drive into the desert buy s land rover..if you want to drive out by a Toyota.
No.
I've used both these cars and while the evoque is very nice it broke down 6 times in 8 months..the duster is 4 years old and never missed a beat.
Need better tires, but nice job!
Thanks 👍
Jak z awaryjnością i eksploatacją tego samochodu? Zastanawiam się nad zakupem 2.0 benzyna
Mam 2.0 benzyna. Nie ma problemu z awaryjnością , o ile masz pieniądze. A żartując mniej, to są dostępne zamienniki, dość tanie, a serwisy można znaleźć, które się specjalizują w Land Roverach. Czy się coś psuje ? Silnik nie, zawieszenie - bajka - 10 lat i nic nie stuka. Amortyzatory tylko wymieniałem. Jakieś drobne rzeczy, typu zamek drzwi, czy teraz sensory parktronic , były wymieniane. Trochę pali, jak każda benzyna turbo - wtrysk jest wykorzystywany do chłodzenia bloku. Jedyną rzeczą, którą można tam wtrysnąć, to jest paliwo, które rozpraszając się - chłodzi. To jest przypadłość wszystkich silników turbo benz. Ja to auto mam dalej, czyli wytrzymuję wszystkie trudy, a co najważniejsze - jest , kiedy go potrzebuję. Nigdy nie było zepsute, wsiadam i jadę. Tak samo było podczas wypraw overlandowych. Nie zawodził.
@@mortyebaniec5340 Jaki masz przebieg ? Kolektor wydechowy już wymieniałeś ? BR KP
@@kamillop.7842 Teraz mam około 145 tys, km . Nie, kolektora nie wymieniałem, ale miałem już raz wymieniony moduł turbo - może o to Ci chodzi? Na taki sam , fabryczny, bo stary świszczał. To było na gwarancji, a do teraz problem nie wraca. Poza tym , teraz wymieniałem cały rozrząd, ale auto ma już 10 lat życia.
@@mortyebaniec5340 Przy okazji sprawdz czy nie masz przedmuchu, kolektory sa wykoanane z SS ale pekaja na spawach mocowania i przedmuch powoduje wpadanie spalin do kabiny a takze moze spowodować slaba prace turbo o ryzyku pozaru nie wspominajac. JA juz mialem z tym problem przy 75kkm przebiegu, kupujac nie zauwazylem tego problemu i musialem wymieniac ale juz wsadzilem zeliwny. Tam jest lancuch, juz przy 145kkm musiales wymienieniac ? Masz wersje 2.0T, dobrze kojarze ? Pozdrawiam
@@kamillop.7842 Poprzedni moduł turbo miał przedmuch , czyli świst. Ten po wymianie tego nie ma. Znam zjawisko i czułbym smród w kabinie. Jeśli chodzi o rozrząd, to tak, jest tam łańcuch , a nawet dwa. Wyminiłem całość , łącznie z zębatkami . Z jednej z nich, tej od wałka zaworów (podójna faza rozrządu) - wypadła jakaś sprężynka i tulejka . Wpadło to niżej , zwisło gdzieś na bloku i powodowało hałas przy rozruchu. A potem, przestawiły mi się fazy rozrządu, ale silnik ocalał. Mam 2.0 benzyna. Pozdro.
Duster is nice off-roading car
Un Duster 🤣🤣 un chiste !!!
Un gatito que quiere ser León.!!
Pruebenlo con un Subaru !!
evoque de asfalt lastiği var ve yükseltmede yok ama yine de dusterın gittiği yerlerden gidebiliyor.. kaldı ki evoque bir off road aracı değil.. defender yada discovery ile karşılaştırmak daha doğru olur.. ve dusterın onlara karşı hiç şansı yok.. ama fiyatına göre duster oldukça yetenekli bir araç.. bizde kullanıyoruz ve memnunuz.. ama doğru bir karşılaştırma olmamış
In which mode are you which tires do you have
Sorry bro it took me so long to respond. Forgive. you have your answers in the other places you asked.
We tested Evoque vs Duster (and Freelander, Tiguan, X-Trail etc) It was basically unanimous. The Evoque is way superior off road. Here's the video: th-cam.com/video/v9txVtgfbhQ/w-d-xo.html
Yes I have come across your videos in the past , and I was not suprised with what I saw. Evoque wins in off-roading with all middle market SUVs, and even its legacy Freelander 2. Its is better . I took it to many places and did plenty of overlanding in it with a bigger fellow cars in convoy. It did extremely well. I have recorded many shots but have not done videos yet. Maybe I will to prove the point.
In the end it all depends on the driver.
Gdzie sa takie fajne tereny koło Wrocławia?
Wzgórza Trzebnickie :)
Umm...... the duster took it all easy rather than the evoque???
No, it wasn't easy go Duster. It had many attempts too, which were not shown. The Evoque's run is uncut, gently approached the obstacle to test if there is enough clearance.
Buen video
Nice
What tires do you have
These are General Grabber AT3 . They are good , quite and gripy. Maybe less in ice-packed snow, especially when they are worn out a bit. But I will buy them again this year before winter.
In which mode are you
Mud & Ruts, bro. Working good. Suspension stiffens (I have Adaptive Dynamic - mangneride). Rear axle is more enganged in this mode straight from the start. See last take of is done by the rear wheels mainly. Notice if front spins. Not at all.
This is not justify because of in duster putting load on back side of car so car get much stable and loaded so easy to climb... And other side evoque nothing so it's unfair comparison
No lift just get decent tires. Tourists in the wet i call this.
Representando a evoque
Love the dacia at least it won't break down every day 👍
Duster is ideal landcar😊
Норм!
Це новая категория нетак . Дастера нежалко .
What hell I just watched...
I would evoque
Buy a freelander
These drivers have no skill
You are comparing toilet with cake
This video is purposely made to insult evoque
Hi Kichu, yeah now that I think of it , maybe. I promise my next video will be putting the Evoque in a better picture. Because it is a great car, from owners perspective. And can do demanding off-roading.
ଗ।।।।।।,,ମ
।।।।।।।ଟ. , ା।
।।।।,
।
ଯ
ସତ।ତ 00
Brexit means Brexit #winning
Please can you gift me this car
You should never mention a dacia in the same sentence with a Car.
Dačia offroud land rover 🖕🖕
Range Rover Sucks dude, just buy a jeep.
Jeeps are unbelievably crap.