Tony (if I may be so bold to address you by your first name), I wish to complement you on this excellent interview of David. As in the first interview, you have a way of bringing forth from him both his brilliance and erudition but also his attractive personal qualities, which are often obscured in his debates with "infernalists," who in turn complain incessantly wabout his pugilistic rhetoric, thereby reducing this remarkable and deep thinker to a caricature they have invented in order to deflect the power and truth of the universalist vision. David's great love and admiration of St Gregory is made vividly and compellingly apparent in both interviews. I hope that viewers will be encouraged to read St Gregory through David's eyes and heart. Thank you. I eagerly look forward to the third interview.
@@christopherconey732 yes The Four Quartets has a similar line. I was curious if DBH did as well because the passage around it would be interesting. I could listen to one o these a week. So good.
I disagree with Heart’s views of Jesus’s teachings and wealth. Jesus never taught that owning things or having wealth is wrong or even bad, he taught us to not be greedy and to not idolize wealth. We should each give from what we have, and in proportion to what we have. The more you have the more you give. Socialism and Communism are you working and the state taking what you earned and giving it to someone else that’s unjust.
To be a follower of the Way was to renounce every claim to private property and to consent to communal ownership of everything (Acts 4:32). Explicit communism. “Money is a root of all evils”. All who are rich are oppressors of workers and lovers of luxury. Profit is theft (4:13-14). The New Testament does not distinguish between good wealth and bad, and definitely Jesus doesn’t. How is this hard to understand? Maybe because it’s inconvenient?
Tony (if I may be so bold to address you by your first name), I wish to complement you on this excellent interview of David. As in the first interview, you have a way of bringing forth from him both his brilliance and erudition but also his attractive personal qualities, which are often obscured in his debates with "infernalists," who in turn complain incessantly wabout his pugilistic rhetoric, thereby reducing this remarkable and deep thinker to a caricature they have invented in order to deflect the power and truth of the universalist vision. David's great love and admiration of St Gregory is made vividly and compellingly apparent in both interviews. I hope that viewers will be encouraged to read St Gregory through David's eyes and heart. Thank you. I eagerly look forward to the third interview.
I could not agree more with Fr Al Kimel.
Enjoyed it. Look forward to part three! Thanks for sharing with us!
A wonderful dialogue!
Amazing interview. Loved it.
The Cappadocians were lit 🔥
What a tremendous conversation. Thank you. A theological feast.
I am looking forward to the next discussion in which St Augustine will be the subject.
2:03 does anybody know which book is he talking about???
St Makrina, intercede in our behalf
From what book is the DBH quote you used? “In the end of all things is the beginning…” Thanks for the talk!
This or something like it is in a T S Eliot poem, but I'd guess that Eliot borrowed it from another.
@@christopherconey732 yes The Four Quartets has a similar line. I was curious if DBH did as well because the passage around it would be interesting. I could listen to one o these a week. So good.
I disagree with Heart’s views of Jesus’s teachings and wealth. Jesus never taught that owning things or having wealth is wrong or even bad, he taught us to not be greedy and to not idolize wealth. We should each give from what we have, and in proportion to what we have. The more you have the more you give.
Socialism and Communism are you working and the state taking what you earned and giving it to someone else that’s unjust.
"blessed are the poor but woe to the rich" - Jesus Christ
To be a follower of the Way was to renounce every claim to private property and to consent to communal ownership of everything (Acts 4:32). Explicit communism. “Money is a root of all evils”. All who are rich are oppressors of workers and lovers of luxury. Profit is theft (4:13-14).
The New Testament does not distinguish between good wealth and bad, and definitely Jesus doesn’t. How is this hard to understand? Maybe because it’s inconvenient?
That last part isn’t even true but I don’t think those are relevant either to the issue.
@@RootinrPootine communism is anachronistic in terms of the ideology being read back into that, but a sense of communal ownership does exist 😊