Imagine the game that The Witcher 3 would be if the cut content would remain. The Avallac'h VS Eredin storyline developed, the tension in Novigrad and a great scale battle between Radovid and Emhyr and the devastation of the Catriona Plague, that even would involve some characters like Iorweth. If the game it's great now, with this things would be the GOAT no doubt.
Game is already so long that many people couldn't finish it and you want even more? Also it is really hard to make long storyline interesting and without plot holes. Hearts of Stone, Blood and Wine were better stories than base game. Base Cyberpunk and Phantom Liberty too.
Seems everything about the political side of things was overlooked or just droped at some development stage, the Reason of State was the worst questline and a massieve let down for many, think some cutted character from past games, like Foltest's daugther(s), could had fixed that a bit in some way😒. Also I do think big chunks of story were just cut/lost, specially at the epiloge, cos the rushed involvement of Skellige in the final battle sideing with Nilfgaard, comes from nowhere into Avallach's plan🤔
i was waiting for Avallach’s heel turn as the “secret final boss” as the game progressed it looked like it was going towards that to me Ciri kept insisting she trusted him and Geralt obviously didn’t, the quest in his lab the female elves words etc, it’s seriously the only slight nick pick i have😭
@@WitcherGeorgeSecond this. I fully expected Avallach to have something subtle planned that Ciri would inadvertently assist in by stopping the end of the world. Something like you stop the wild hunt, she stops the frost and in his plan dies trying, then he stages a long-winded coup and takes over the elven homeworld now that Eredin is out of the running ( or _something_ ). I kept getting bad vibes off him throughout the ending, but had to be satisfied with "you're one part in a larger story that, sadly, you will never know the full part of because you're a bit player". Its sort of like a cliff-hanger but more like denied climax.
@@Your-Least-Favorite-StrangerI expected the same from Avallach. During my first play through, I didn't trust him at all and the last words of Eredin triggered a "I knew it!" effect. So when I was on my way to the tower, I was hoping another huge bossfight.
I really wish the production team wasn't rushed for the end act with Dykstra because it's such a sudden change of character with one of the highest IQ and tactical minds in all the Witcher universe. Just imagining how it could have played out differently had the CDPR team had a lot more time to work on that story line. Loving the Witcher 3 content
Maybe in the future we’ll get a Witcher 3 director’s cut with all the missing content and characters probably won’t ever happen but I’d be happy to play it!
The cut scenario Novigrad being attacked by Wild Hunt actually would change the whole landscape of the city buried by snow & corpses. So many moving parts & factors must be considered & the possibility of many failed quests if player actually skipped it. As for more Wild Hunt related quests. I remember in CDPR W3 forum there supposed to be a cut scenario where Geralt try to actively infiltrate Wild Hunt base as remember he was an ex wild hunt lieutenant too btw during his forced captivity (completely missed by so many players). This is the stuffs that would give more exposures to Eredin & his lieutenants, possible interactions & dialogues & flashback stuffs.
I've always liked the Wild Hunt despite what people say. I knew what potential they had, but I understand that it wasn't there in the game so of course people are going to criticise that. The game spent too much time on everything else.
While I do wish we had a looot more content on Aen Elle elves, I didn't want Avallac'h to become the villains. I like his end goal and how we settled with him. I'm at least satisfied with how he was done, once baddie joining forces for a reasonable cause. I remember hoping I wouldn't have to kill him at the tower. 'Would they do the most obvious thing with him, oh they didn't'. Solas already put me trough that pain except the Bioware team were very discreet with the foreshadowing. Eredin blatantly lying was cheap. While they perfected the menacing part (I mean, woof that armor), there was a lot left to be desired. Book Eredin seems more interesting to me. Ge'els actually not partaking in the hunt seemed like a cool concept to me, I didn't expect him to behave like that. But Caranthir was a complete wasted potential especially with the buildup. All of the Wild Hunt characters in the Battle of Kaer Morhen were well flashed, pretty much perfect introduction. 3rd arc did feel rushed, with how well finding Ciri was done. I just recently beat the game for the first time, there were times you could feel like something was changed or not done to it's full potential even if almost every quest felt so fulfilling. The third Crone just reappearing at the 'bad ending' was also kinda disappointing to me. I wish they integrated her in another way even tho Geralt hunting her down was freaking cool as well. I missed having Iorveth, I hope we'll at least see him in Witcher 4. Playing Witcher 2 currently and I'm feeling the pain of them excluding him now.
You are totally right that the story regarding the Novigrad, Avallach etc. could have been much more developed, however I'm glad it's not because if you look at the state of the modern games, almost every one of them is barely playable due to the bugs, bad performance or just stretched boring content. And the reason for that is over extending the scope of the game, bad resource planning and stupid executives. CD Project red could have gone with the numbers game of by extending this storyline we can gain xx amount of additional gameplay and the present the number of hours to the public and possibly make more sales. However if this have had happened, we might have ended up with something like Cyberpunk on launch or now relevant Dragons Dogma 2. I much more prefer quality games with smaller ambition than some bullshit like nowdays Assassin Creed is. Over ambition kills every project. Great video, thanks!
As someone who is about to finish doing a Witcher saga and was writing out my thoughts for a pinned comment this was really interesting. I agree a lot that the Wild Hunt and Radovid assassination is some of the most undercooked parts of the game. I feel like the Grandmaster of Witcher 1 is their best antagonist and I hope the remake can flesh out Azar Javed even more and make the Professor's performs better. I like the DLC villains of Witcher 3 but they have less time to be developed compared to a full game
@@WitcherGeorge I'm hoping for improved W3 gameplay, potions effects lasting a bit longer, fix up some narrative hole, make Azar a little more ground, and that they don't try and put everything from Witcher 3 in there (all the armour sets and sword. It's a smaller scale area). Also hope they bring back Andrew Wincott (voice of Raphael in BG3) as the Grandmaster. Fingers crossed it's good and I'll keep an eye on your channel for updates
They literally cut the character that had invested me in the witcher world. I barely played witcher 2 but Iorveth had me very interested in the witcher universe.
I honestly wanted more development with Siegfried of Denesle. When Hearts of Stone reintroduced The Order of the Flaming Rose, I had hoped we would find Siegfried someplace, maybe even have him join us at Kaer Morhen.
The decision to change the White Frost from the books was always the change I found most interesting. I'm still not sure what it's supposed to be in the games. Eridin doesn't bother me because he always was a racial supremacist conqueror, and that's it. Even the idea he killed Auberon is much more downplayed and unlikely in the novels iirc. It was just an accident. I also wonder how much of Witcher 3 content got cut because of how bad CDPRs project management is.
I honestly don't like what they did with it. I feel like it was meant to be something entirely different by spirit, some sort of uncertain, vague threat from the long distant future, dark and inevitable like a simple climate change. Instead they made it into some kind of ice god that you can physically defeat somehow. Also the fact that Ciri can do it herself is contradicting to everything we heard about it prior to the last several minutes of the game
I don't really get how Wild Hunt even managed to find the world where Geralt and Yennefer were hidden, and how exactly Geralt was able to chase after them? Where did he find the Viper witchers? Can he travel between worlds too? Love your channel, you are doing a great job! Hope you will make a video about Fake Ciri and how it all works with Witcher 3 plot regarding Emhyr and Ciri becoming and empress
C'mon, there is no doubt that avallach is evil or have you forgotten that it was him that almost succeeded in convincing (Forcing) Ciri to go to bed with the previous king of the Hunt or that whole mission in Witcher 3 set in his laboratory???? Yes, he is helping Ciri, BUT, he is not inocent, we do not know his true reasons AND everything points to two options: 1st - He wants to father Ciri's babies AND 2nd - He wants to use Ciri's powers to his own goals So, yes, Avallach is evil, he might now be outwards evil, BUT evil nontheless
You guys are actually- actually sitting here complaining about the depth and choice impact in&around Novigrad.. take a step back and get some perspective.. you can play that city alone 4 completely different ways.. the game is 10 years old now guys. In terms of depth and story an player agency - this is the role model, not the example to complain about. Someone has lost the plot 😅
My only disappointment in Eredin, is we never got to tag team as Ciri and Geralt against him, for some reason Caranthir was the one who got into a handicap match while Eredin got defeated in a fair fight, which takes away from his final boss status.
Hey George, glad to see you making this video; I love the books and I really enjoy playing the games, that being said there's a lot of wrong with W3 in terms of story, characters, worldbuilding, plot etc. I appreciate your analysis
Agree and wish more people would address those issues, but usually it's just blind praise and nothing else. I believe you can love the game and also analyze and criticize it at the same time
He's not meant to be cool though, it's clear from the Witcher 2 that he's unstable and embodies everything that is wrong with the Northern Realms. Radovid postures as the saviour of the North but his sole redeeming quality is to be a great strategist. He's going to take over Temeria, betrayed Kaedwen and left them hanging without an Army, wants to exterminate all non-humans, burn all mages, apothecaries and herbalists at the stake and gave near-unlimited power to a Cult of bigoted zealots who revel in torturing people for fun. In comparison, it's not even far-fetched to say that Emhyr is a significant improvement, and a rather charismatic one at that.
I don’t get the Triss slander, Vesemir,Eskel and Lambert (his family) could told Gerard everything but they chose not to. It makes you think that they know Triss is the right one not Yen.
I don't think that the content was cut because of rushed development because they could have cut side content instead. The focus is always on the main quest. The decisions they made seem deliberate to me. Things change during development, including ideas and storylines. I think they realized that the Wild Hunt is simply not and could not be an interesting antagonist regardless of how much screen time you give them, and that it is better to focus more on the characters that we like than on villains. Otherwise they would risk bloating the story and making it all too convoluted. A simple, evil villain like Eredin can be quite effective if you want to keep the focus on other characters. I'm not even sad that Iorveth was cut. His storyline ended in The Witcher 2. There's no need or reason for having him around in Velen or Novigrad. Why would he leave Saskia? Roche, on the other hand, lost his country. It makes sense for him to be there.
I agree with everything, but I don't think Avallac'h should be a villain. In the books, his goal was always to destroy the white frost and he thought it would need an Aen Elle + Ciri child to get it done. But between the books and Witcher 3, he learnt that Ciri could do it too. So he shifted from trying to force that super-child to getting Ciri ready to take on the white frost. He never wanted to invade other worlds or kill anyone, in my opinion. He's more like a "good guy", who has no issues to do whatever he thinks is needed to save his world. So I really liked how I was ready to fight him in the tower but he just puts down his weapons like "Nah, there's no logical reason to fight, please just let us give Ciri a good feeling to win her fight!".
Sadly, to me, the cut content surrounding the Wild Hunt to this day leaves me disappointed in the game, despite all its accomplishments. The third act is quite simply unfinished and rushed. We are told that Geralt has regained his memories of his time with the hunt, but as a player I know as much as I did in the very first game! I hoped with all my being that the enhanced edition would do what the other games did i.e. add loads of content. Loc Muine in Witcher 2 was notorious for how short and to the point it was so a full questline for both paths were added. The netflix armor quest was fun, but with all that Act 3 lacked in Wild Hunt it needed a lot more. I remember telling a friend at release that if you only play the main quest, you will be disappointed and sadly this disappointment has festered slightly. The writers failed, focusing on the second act to the exclusion of the final.
I've been bothered by all these points for years Much as I love Witcher 3 for what it is, I've always loved Witcher 2 more for its tighter story, Witcher 3 is too loose plus all these missing bits
Would be a really cool idea if they did some sort of directors cut version where they fully develop all these storylines. It sounds like that game would be like 150 to 200 hours long or something which would be awesome
I replayed the witcher 2 recently. It's a real shame Iorveth isn't involved in the 3rd game at all. Maybe he will make an appearance in one of the next games
In the books, at least for a bit, Eredin tries to ingratiate himself to Ciri, with witty banter, some taunting and even attempts at sparring. And some of it actually rubs off, i remember correctly. He's given nuance and tridimentionality instead of "scary guy bad". I love the games, but the Books are the pinnacle of these stories. I would LOVE to see people actually tackle these cut content on W2 and W3, via the modding and quest tools, one day. If i could, i'd definitely do it.
In the books, Eredin also lacks ambition to become a king, and is implied to have been surprised over what happened to Auberon. Just saying that the nuance he is given in the book does not translate into a usurper-king-tyrant we see in TW3.
![[TH] FS vs BME - VCT Ascension Pacific - Lower Bracket Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnygqsR2Fig/mqdefault.jpg)
Imagine the game that The Witcher 3 would be if the cut content would remain. The Avallac'h VS Eredin storyline developed, the tension in Novigrad and a great scale battle between Radovid and Emhyr and the devastation of the Catriona Plague, that even would involve some characters like Iorweth. If the game it's great now, with this things would be the GOAT no doubt.
Everything with Iorveth is one of my biggest gaming regrets
It would go from one of the greatest games ever made to THE greatest game ever.
Game is already so long that many people couldn't finish it and you want even more? Also it is really hard to make long storyline interesting and without plot holes. Hearts of Stone, Blood and Wine were better stories than base game. Base Cyberpunk and Phantom Liberty too.
It’s still literally the goat
It's already a better game than Skyrim and that says a lot, so...
yo i liked this video, it’s very interesting to learn what could’ve been in tw3
Please keep making videos mate. We really need more witcher content.
Seems everything about the political side of things was overlooked or just droped at some development stage, the Reason of State was the worst questline and a massieve let down for many, think some cutted character from past games, like Foltest's daugther(s), could had fixed that a bit in some way😒. Also I do think big chunks of story were just cut/lost, specially at the epiloge, cos the rushed involvement of Skellige in the final battle sideing with Nilfgaard, comes from nowhere into Avallach's plan🤔
i was waiting for Avallach’s heel turn as the “secret final boss” as the game progressed it looked like it was going towards that to me Ciri kept insisting she trusted him and Geralt obviously didn’t, the quest in his lab the female elves words etc, it’s seriously the only slight nick pick i have😭
Well he's a trolling asshole in the books. So it was easier for me to chalk it up to just being an asshole.
It's also one for me, the ending felt a little underwhelming only in that regard, the rest was great
@@WitcherGeorgeSecond this. I fully expected Avallach to have something subtle planned that Ciri would inadvertently assist in by stopping the end of the world.
Something like you stop the wild hunt, she stops the frost and in his plan dies trying, then he stages a long-winded coup and takes over the elven homeworld now that Eredin is out of the running ( or _something_ ).
I kept getting bad vibes off him throughout the ending, but had to be satisfied with "you're one part in a larger story that, sadly, you will never know the full part of because you're a bit player". Its sort of like a cliff-hanger but more like denied climax.
@@Your-Least-Favorite-StrangerI expected the same from Avallach. During my first play through, I didn't trust him at all and the last words of Eredin triggered a "I knew it!" effect. So when I was on my way to the tower, I was hoping another huge bossfight.
I really wish the production team wasn't rushed for the end act with Dykstra because it's such a sudden change of character with one of the highest IQ and tactical minds in all the Witcher universe. Just imagining how it could have played out differently had the CDPR team had a lot more time to work on that story line. Loving the Witcher 3 content
Maybe in the future we’ll get a Witcher 3 director’s cut with all the missing content and characters probably won’t ever happen but I’d be happy to play it!
if it sells 30 million more copies might happen haha
Honestly a final fight with the Elven Mage in that huge tower would’ve been such a cool finale
I was so hoping for it during my first time play through :')
Just went back to grab a couple of trophies from Blood and Wine that I never picked up. Still an amazing game
Perfect expansion
The cut scenario Novigrad being attacked by Wild Hunt actually would change the whole landscape of the city buried by snow & corpses. So many moving parts & factors must be considered & the possibility of many failed quests if player actually skipped it.
As for more Wild Hunt related quests. I remember in CDPR W3 forum there supposed to be a cut scenario where Geralt try to actively infiltrate Wild Hunt base as remember he was an ex wild hunt lieutenant too btw during his forced captivity (completely missed by so many players). This is the stuffs that would give more exposures to Eredin & his lieutenants, possible interactions & dialogues & flashback stuffs.
I would have loved to learn more about his "Wild" period. In my opinion, the two first games were somehow teasing further information about it.
Witcher 3 my favourite game
Best game ever
It used to be my favourite game too.
I've always liked the Wild Hunt despite what people say. I knew what potential they had, but I understand that it wasn't there in the game so of course people are going to criticise that. The game spent too much time on everything else.
While I do wish we had a looot more content on Aen Elle elves, I didn't want Avallac'h to become the villains. I like his end goal and how we settled with him. I'm at least satisfied with how he was done, once baddie joining forces for a reasonable cause. I remember hoping I wouldn't have to kill him at the tower. 'Would they do the most obvious thing with him, oh they didn't'. Solas already put me trough that pain except the Bioware team were very discreet with the foreshadowing.
Eredin blatantly lying was cheap. While they perfected the menacing part (I mean, woof that armor), there was a lot left to be desired. Book Eredin seems more interesting to me. Ge'els actually not partaking in the hunt seemed like a cool concept to me, I didn't expect him to behave like that. But Caranthir was a complete wasted potential especially with the buildup. All of the Wild Hunt characters in the Battle of Kaer Morhen were well flashed, pretty much perfect introduction. 3rd arc did feel rushed, with how well finding Ciri was done.
I just recently beat the game for the first time, there were times you could feel like something was changed or not done to it's full potential even if almost every quest felt so fulfilling. The third Crone just reappearing at the 'bad ending' was also kinda disappointing to me. I wish they integrated her in another way even tho Geralt hunting her down was freaking cool as well.
I missed having Iorveth, I hope we'll at least see him in Witcher 4. Playing Witcher 2 currently and I'm feeling the pain of them excluding him now.
Iorveth was sorely missing from Witcher 3. He was one of my favorite characters from Witcher 2.
I'm from Graz, the region in Austria where the legend of the Wild Hunt comes from.
You are totally right that the story regarding the Novigrad, Avallach etc. could have been much more developed, however I'm glad it's not because if you look at the state of the modern games, almost every one of them is barely playable due to the bugs, bad performance or just stretched boring content. And the reason for that is over extending the scope of the game, bad resource planning and stupid executives. CD Project red could have gone with the numbers game of by extending this storyline we can gain xx amount of additional gameplay and the present the number of hours to the public and possibly make more sales. However if this have had happened, we might have ended up with something like Cyberpunk on launch or now relevant Dragons Dogma 2. I much more prefer quality games with smaller ambition than some bullshit like nowdays Assassin Creed is. Over ambition kills every project. Great video, thanks!
As someone who is about to finish doing a Witcher saga and was writing out my thoughts for a pinned comment this was really interesting. I agree a lot that the Wild Hunt and Radovid assassination is some of the most undercooked parts of the game. I feel like the Grandmaster of Witcher 1 is their best antagonist and I hope the remake can flesh out Azar Javed even more and make the Professor's performs better. I like the DLC villains of Witcher 3 but they have less time to be developed compared to a full game
I'm quite curious how they'll handle the Witcher Remake!
@@WitcherGeorge I'm hoping for improved W3 gameplay, potions effects lasting a bit longer, fix up some narrative hole, make Azar a little more ground, and that they don't try and put everything from Witcher 3 in there (all the armour sets and sword. It's a smaller scale area). Also hope they bring back Andrew Wincott (voice of Raphael in BG3) as the Grandmaster. Fingers crossed it's good and I'll keep an eye on your channel for updates
They literally cut the character that had invested me in the witcher world. I barely played witcher 2 but Iorveth had me very interested in the witcher universe.
He will always be in my heart...
Same he got me super invested, although I still love Witcher 3, I just miss my elf bro.
I honestly wanted more development with Siegfried of Denesle. When Hearts of Stone reintroduced The Order of the Flaming Rose, I had hoped we would find Siegfried someplace, maybe even have him join us at Kaer Morhen.
They fucked over witcher 2 players nothing from that story carried over anies no closure,saskia nothing.
I read the books after playing the games and I was surprised how “human” the wild hunt was, especially Eradin
The decision to change the White Frost from the books was always the change I found most interesting. I'm still not sure what it's supposed to be in the games. Eridin doesn't bother me because he always was a racial supremacist conqueror, and that's it. Even the idea he killed Auberon is much more downplayed and unlikely in the novels iirc. It was just an accident.
I also wonder how much of Witcher 3 content got cut because of how bad CDPRs project management is.
I honestly don't like what they did with it. I feel like it was meant to be something entirely different by spirit, some sort of uncertain, vague threat from the long distant future, dark and inevitable like a simple climate change. Instead they made it into some kind of ice god that you can physically defeat somehow. Also the fact that Ciri can do it herself is contradicting to everything we heard about it prior to the last several minutes of the game
Love your videos mate. Please keep the content coming ♥️
Would love to hear more about Witcher cut content
I would have loved a Letho, Roche, and Iorveth team up.
I don't really get how Wild Hunt even managed to find the world where Geralt and Yennefer were hidden, and how exactly Geralt was able to chase after them? Where did he find the Viper witchers? Can he travel between worlds too?
Love your channel, you are doing a great job! Hope you will make a video about Fake Ciri and how it all works with Witcher 3 plot regarding Emhyr and Ciri becoming and empress
C'mon, there is no doubt that avallach is evil or have you forgotten that it was him that almost succeeded in convincing (Forcing) Ciri to go to bed with the previous king of the Hunt or that whole mission in Witcher 3 set in his laboratory????
Yes, he is helping Ciri, BUT, he is not inocent, we do not know his true reasons AND everything points to two options:
1st - He wants to father Ciri's babies
AND
2nd - He wants to use Ciri's powers to his own goals
So, yes, Avallach is evil, he might now be outwards evil, BUT evil nontheless
The Eternal Hunt mod gives wild hunt raids, with the big 3 emerging sometimes, and the fight's way better than the vanilla fights XD Very entertaining
You guys are actually- actually sitting here complaining about the depth and choice impact in&around Novigrad.. take a step back and get some perspective.. you can play that city alone 4 completely different ways.. the game is 10 years old now guys. In terms of depth and story an player agency - this is the role model, not the example to complain about. Someone has lost the plot 😅
CD Project Red should really reconsider bringing back the cut content. I would pay another 59.99 in an instant.
My only disappointment in Eredin, is we never got to tag team as Ciri and Geralt against him, for some reason Caranthir was the one who got into a handicap match while Eredin got defeated in a fair fight, which takes away from his final boss status.
Hey George, glad to see you making this video; I love the books and I really enjoy playing the games, that being said there's a lot of wrong with W3 in terms of story, characters, worldbuilding, plot etc. I appreciate your analysis
Thank you :)
Agree and wish more people would address those issues, but usually it's just blind praise and nothing else. I believe you can love the game and also analyze and criticize it at the same time
6:30 I don't think his impotency was due to him seeing Ciri as a animal, rather, he was just a very old elf.
I wish Radovid was cooler or had more screen time tbh
It would've been nice to include Princess Adda as his wife from the first game. She didn't even get a mention in Wild Hunt.
He's not meant to be cool though, it's clear from the Witcher 2 that he's unstable and embodies everything that is wrong with the Northern Realms.
Radovid postures as the saviour of the North but his sole redeeming quality is to be a great strategist. He's going to take over Temeria, betrayed Kaedwen and left them hanging without an Army, wants to exterminate all non-humans, burn all mages, apothecaries and herbalists at the stake and gave near-unlimited power to a Cult of bigoted zealots who revel in torturing people for fun.
In comparison, it's not even far-fetched to say that Emhyr is a significant improvement, and a rather charismatic one at that.
Can't find your samurai George channel. I don't want to miss that TW2 playthrough
Here it is!
youtube.com/@SamuraiGeorge?si=4otxvUIOgQHc7kwS
@@WitcherGeorge nice, thank you! Subscribed 🔔
If the stuff they did us still there in the files, it may be possible for modders to use Redkit to restore some of it.
Downdoot for saying bad Triss. Triss is the correct love interest.
Id like your take on the dragon age lore and such.
Great takes. Fully agree
people who know how to use redkit, please take notes
Can you Please! Make mutant race lore.
I don’t get the Triss slander,
Vesemir,Eskel and Lambert (his family) could told Gerard everything but they chose not to.
It makes you think that they know Triss is the right one not Yen.
No bad Triss, she just knew that Geralt deserved so much better then Yennifers patheitc self
Good stuff as always mate
I don't think that the content was cut because of rushed development because they could have cut side content instead. The focus is always on the main quest. The decisions they made seem deliberate to me. Things change during development, including ideas and storylines. I think they realized that the Wild Hunt is simply not and could not be an interesting antagonist regardless of how much screen time you give them, and that it is better to focus more on the characters that we like than on villains. Otherwise they would risk bloating the story and making it all too convoluted. A simple, evil villain like Eredin can be quite effective if you want to keep the focus on other characters.
I'm not even sad that Iorveth was cut. His storyline ended in The Witcher 2. There's no need or reason for having him around in Velen or Novigrad. Why would he leave Saskia? Roche, on the other hand, lost his country. It makes sense for him to be there.
The wild hunt is the weakest part of the wirtcher 3 and that’s weird
Wild hunt sucks in wild hunt?
I agree with everything, but I don't think Avallac'h should be a villain. In the books, his goal was always to destroy the white frost and he thought it would need an Aen Elle + Ciri child to get it done. But between the books and Witcher 3, he learnt that Ciri could do it too. So he shifted from trying to force that super-child to getting Ciri ready to take on the white frost.
He never wanted to invade other worlds or kill anyone, in my opinion. He's more like a "good guy", who has no issues to do whatever he thinks is needed to save his world.
So I really liked how I was ready to fight him in the tower but he just puts down his weapons like "Nah, there's no logical reason to fight, please just let us give Ciri a good feeling to win her fight!".
Sadly, to me, the cut content surrounding the Wild Hunt to this day leaves me disappointed in the game, despite all its accomplishments. The third act is quite simply unfinished and rushed.
We are told that Geralt has regained his memories of his time with the hunt, but as a player I know as much as I did in the very first game! I hoped with all my being that the enhanced edition would do what the other games did i.e. add loads of content. Loc Muine in Witcher 2 was notorious for how short and to the point it was so a full questline for both paths were added.
The netflix armor quest was fun, but with all that Act 3 lacked in Wild Hunt it needed a lot more.
I remember telling a friend at release that if you only play the main quest, you will be disappointed and sadly this disappointment has festered slightly. The writers failed, focusing on the second act to the exclusion of the final.
I've been bothered by all these points for years
Much as I love Witcher 3 for what it is, I've always loved Witcher 2 more for its tighter story, Witcher 3 is too loose plus all these missing bits
Would be a really cool idea if they did some sort of directors cut version where they fully develop all these storylines. It sounds like that game would be like 150 to 200 hours long or something which would be awesome
An entire storyline dedicated to taking down Caranthir and learning about WH, their individual stories and weaknesses etc would have been great
I think they might remaster it after the witcher 1 remaster
or at least make a “extended cut with all of the things they wanted it to have” which would probably be like a next gen update or smth
Maybe with the ps6 generation we'll get a 3.5... After the 1+2 remakes...
I replayed the witcher 2 recently. It's a real shame Iorveth isn't involved in the 3rd game at all. Maybe he will make an appearance in one of the next games
Cut content always make me sad
I wish CDPR would restore all the minor cut content in a update
Im sure that avallach was supposed to be a backstabber but when they ran out of time they had to cut out a good portion of the story😢
if you havent already can you make a video on why each witcher school is based on a animal?
Witcher 3 is perfect as is , the story is better as we played it
Stuff like this shows why I largerly prefer the Assassins of Kings.
Avaloch should have been the secret finial super boss instead of detlaft
Love u❤
💪👍
In the books, at least for a bit, Eredin tries to ingratiate himself to Ciri, with witty banter, some taunting and even attempts at sparring. And some of it actually rubs off, i remember correctly. He's given nuance and tridimentionality instead of "scary guy bad". I love the games, but the Books are the pinnacle of these stories. I would LOVE to see people actually tackle these cut content on W2 and W3, via the modding and quest tools, one day. If i could, i'd definitely do it.
In the books, Eredin also lacks ambition to become a king, and is implied to have been surprised over what happened to Auberon. Just saying that the nuance he is given in the book does not translate into a usurper-king-tyrant we see in TW3.
@@Smuusik Couldn't agree more.
1st
Biggest Witcher fan for many years. all this woke shit ruined this franchise along with any other I used to love..Its sick
The franchise hasn't been ruined.
The gaming franchise isnt ruined
Only the netlfix show
@@AB-fr2ei Netflix Witcher hasn't been ruined and just you being a bad Witcher fan.
I know..But
@@LNER985 Netflix witcher was horrible and an insult to the witcher