Thanks a lot for your educational works. Now I do have an idea about modern physics that I hadn´t . I commend you to keep doing this videos are really important for people like me. Thank you very much
@@PhysicsHigh That is a very interesting reason for not mentioning it. But that presents me with a problem. We have the "A" and "B" theory of time but neither have been tested. So it would follow from the "untestable" that neither of them are theories. So why do physicists insist on calling them theories? I'm not looking for an argument or a debate, but it does get confusing when in one thing they say a theory must be backed up by imperical evidence and then on the other hand just say it's a theory without any evidence. Very confusing.
@@Redserpent2000 string theory is only 'untestable' dues to technological limitations. we may ultimately be able to test at far higher energy levels or develop new analytic tools that could tell us more, but with present equipment and theory String Theory is untestable.
An excellent presentation. But, at 18:17 you say: "we now have a theory that 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨 the behavior of protons, neutrons, and other types of baryons." As I understand it theory only 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙩𝙨 behavior and does not 'explain' it. Bohr was adament about that: 'Shut up and calculate', i.e. no ontology allowed. Orthodox quantum theory only claims to describe 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 happens, not to explain why. Strictly speaking. :)
Best introduction so far💯✅
Thanks a lot for your educational works. Now I do have an idea about modern physics that I hadn´t . I commend you to keep doing this videos are really important for people like me. Thank you very much
This was a bomb of a video and i had to create a channel just to comment, appreciate and thank you for your efforts, sir 🙌
Thanks so much for the overview
I signed up for the patreon, your lectures are gold!
Thank you so much.
Slight hiatus with other work commitments but will be making more soon.
Thank you very much. This is very helpful to grab the overview of modern physics.
These videos are amazing
Thanks a lot professor
You’re doing a great job
Thankyou. And do share
I like the timeline layout!
Really, An Excellent explanation!
Excellent! This is a very timely topic! And presented brilliantly!
Glad it was helpful!
Max Planck before and after quantum :-)
Thank you
You're welcome
Great mini intro to the history of Physics. I am surprised that you did not mention String Theory?
Thanks
The only issue is that string theory is currently untestable and so (controversially) may not be science. I’ll expect some push back 🤓
@@PhysicsHigh That is a very interesting reason for not mentioning it. But that presents me with a problem. We have the "A" and "B" theory of time but neither have been tested. So it would follow from the "untestable" that neither of them are theories. So why do physicists insist on calling them theories? I'm not looking for an argument or a debate, but it does get confusing when in one thing they say a theory must be backed up by imperical evidence and then on the other hand just say it's a theory without any evidence. Very confusing.
@@Redserpent2000 string theory is only 'untestable' dues to technological limitations. we may ultimately be able to test at far higher energy levels or develop new analytic tools that could tell us more, but with present equipment and theory String Theory is untestable.
I’m in awe how he can write backwards
Im thinking about the same. Just wish to know how
That's called a light board
An excellent presentation. But, at 18:17 you say: "we now have a theory that 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙨 the behavior of protons, neutrons, and other types of baryons." As I understand it theory only 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙩𝙨 behavior and does not 'explain' it. Bohr was adament about that: 'Shut up and calculate', i.e. no ontology allowed. Orthodox quantum theory only claims to describe 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 happens, not to explain why. Strictly speaking. :)
❤
how do you write backwards?
🤓. Video trick I write normally and flip the video.
@@PhysicsHigh does that mean that your wear your shirt backwards?
@@aidenshort8788 😂😂😂
In urdu
Why does every video need to ask for likes and subs, very annoying. 100% of people know they exist
True but many people forget and don’t like and the TH-cam algorithm looks for engagement that way and creators want their videos to grow.