What is Wave Particle Duality?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 มิ.ย. 2024
  • This video looks at the history of ideas behind the concept of wave particle duality, with a particular focus on the work of Louis de Broglie and the matter-wave hypothesis. After discussing the groundbreaking experimental work of Thomas Young and the concept of wave interference, a brief discussion is given to Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect. This provides a launch point for a discussion of de Broglie's matter-wave hypothesis, and includes a detailed analysis of Bohr's model of the atom, as well as the interpretation of the de Broglie wave function using the famous double slit experiment.
    References:
    Quantum physics of atoms, molecules, solids, nuclei and particles - Eisberg and Resnick
    Introduction to Quantum Mechanics - Griffiths and Schroeter
    Introduction to Quantum Mechanics - Phillips
    Vibrations and Waves - King
    The wave nature of the electron - Louis de Broglie (www.nobelprize.org/uploads/20...)
    I Don't Understand Quantum Physics - Douglas Ross (www.southampton.ac.uk/~doug/q...)
    The Quantum Story - Jim Baggot
    Quantum Physics for Dummies - Steven Holzner
    Thirty Years that Shook Physics - Gamow
    Inward Bound - Abraham Pais
    You can help support this channel via the Physics Explained Patreon account: / physicsexplained
    You can follow me on instagram: / physics_explained_ig
    You can follow me on Twitter: / physicsexplain1

ความคิดเห็น • 583

  • @Madsy9
    @Madsy9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +234

    Your in-depth physics history lessons are just incredible. Thank you for your hard work.

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      My pleasure!

    • @John14-6...
      @John14-6... 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos c ccx

    • @S_C_
      @S_C_ ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s cool but not 100% accurate. Very much a byproduct of Eurocentric education. Everything ancient didn’t begin in “ancient” Greece. He always implies that.

    • @perdedor3571
      @perdedor3571 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@PhysicsExplainedVideosI agree, it's very well done. Would you mind if I used a bit of it for my class?

  • @davinmercier2895
    @davinmercier2895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +556

    This is the 3Blue1Brown of physics

    • @vishnupriyanmurugan9718
      @vishnupriyanmurugan9718 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You are correct band he is soooooooper coooool

    • @tetbundy5683
      @tetbundy5683 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Yeah. Just much more serious in tone i think

    • @nupeldadbaker9526
      @nupeldadbaker9526 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Indeed. Same as Grant does in 3Blue1Brown, this channel explains the most complex material in the most understandable way. It should be mandatory for every graduate textbook writer to watch this channel as they demonstrate great talent to turn simple subjects to horribly intimidating (Somehow I think they do that intentionally though)

    • @dmeemd7787
      @dmeemd7787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @DonaldJ 😁

    • @dmeemd7787
      @dmeemd7787 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They should do some sort of collab 4 videos, just not in the cliche sense..
      Grant could REALLY help break down the math and yeah, that would be amazing!!

  • @complex314i
    @complex314i 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    YES! Finally someone who uses parenthesis! So many people leave them out.
    As a mathematician, I love that you used parenthesis when you wrote trig. Even text books annoyingly will write sina+b. Is this:
    1. sin(a)+b
    or
    2. sin(a+b)
    Which is it?
    Plus, trig (and logs) are functions. As such, they should have functional parenthesis as found in f(x).

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Glad you appreciate the parenthesis

    • @cyberbrunk
      @cyberbrunk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Engineerings are absolutely awful about that sometimes. I've had professors who write "sin ab" and "sin(a)*b" interchangeably

    • @pianoman16
      @pianoman16 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cyberbrunk or maybe (sin a) * b.

    • @jannegrey593
      @jannegrey593 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah. Consistency and clarity are important. Especially since there are so many trig identities to remember that missing parenthesis will shift you from one to the other.

    • @ami443
      @ami443 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cyberbrunk engineers use () exactly like mathematicians do because they already *are* mathematicians but for real stuff.

  • @sheastewart7608
    @sheastewart7608 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    As a chemist trying to refresh my understanding of quantum physics to a degree, these videos are invaluable. Thank you for these

    • @sadovniksocratus1375
      @sadovniksocratus1375 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quantum Light (h) is a dualistic quantum particle that in the cosmic vacuum
      can fly at a constant speed (c=1). In this movement, light uses its linear spin
      and it does not produce electromagnetic waves. Light behaves like a corpuscular.
      But light can behave like a wave if it uses its angular rotation (the torque required
      to accelerate angularly around the axis of rotation). In this situation, the speed
      of the light is faster than the constant. The speed is c>1.
      This situation is explained by Lorentz transformations.
      The problem is that we do not know the geometric shape of the light quantum.

  • @mickeymoose636
    @mickeymoose636 3 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    You’re the best physics explainer on youtube

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Very kind of you to say, thanks for the feedback

    •  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, Theoria Apophasis
      is!

    • @Ruhan885
      @Ruhan885 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is because he goes into depth.

    • @barrycoad2080
      @barrycoad2080 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/uc6CGRjsWW0/w-d-xo.html

    • @toddmarshall7573
      @toddmarshall7573 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@frankdimeglio8216 What non-sense. Saying in all the permutations you can think of doesn't change that.

  • @rdiznfriends
    @rdiznfriends 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    this channel is a hidden gem. please keep making videos, they are tremendous.

  • @stevecraig2060
    @stevecraig2060 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    So glad that you have posted a new video! I have been checking every week for the last month in the hope that you had not disappeared! Please keep the videos coming :-)

  • @happyrogue7146
    @happyrogue7146 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the knowledge i have gathered in this 43 minute video on particle duality is more than that i acquired in high school.

  • @ildossi7934
    @ildossi7934 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    awsome videos and yuo have a special gift in the way you explain the subjects. I regret my English is not good enough to express how much I apprciate your work. thanks for keeping uploading

  • @sombal1999
    @sombal1999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Ending quote gave me chills

  • @dosomething3
    @dosomething3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Excellent

  • @TheZenytram
    @TheZenytram 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Best introduction to QM in the whole internet

  • @ps200306
    @ps200306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Great video. Lovely mix of science and history which I've always thought is necessary to bring the subject alive.

  • @L2p2
    @L2p2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I like your way of presenting the historical evolution of an idea. Its brings out the process involved in doing physics.

  • @burnsmclean1396
    @burnsmclean1396 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I teach a Year 12 Physics class in NSW, Australia and I have just recommended that all of my students watch this video in order to clarify their understanding of one of the modules in this course. Your integration of mathematical content is second-to-none! Well done!

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just make sure that you explain to your students that what they are watching here is not proper physics but the science history of a false ontology similar to the phlogiston that is still around, even though we know that it's not correct.

    • @sheastewart7608
      @sheastewart7608 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@schmetterling4477 I'm really unsure what you mean by this comment. This video pretty much only covers well accepted physical theories.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sheastewart7608 Wave particle duality is not a physical theory. It's simple bullshit. As MIT's Allan Adams points out: "10^23 electrons don't make waves, they make cheese.". Every bit of matter and radiation in the universe follows the laws of quantum mechanics. There is a near endless amount of variety in those phenomena. What you will never see are particles (I hope you know what a particle is in physics) and waves.

    • @sheastewart7608
      @sheastewart7608 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@schmetterling4477 are you any sort of scientist yourself?

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sheastewart7608 Yes, but why does it matter that I am a physicist? That still doesn't help you with your problem: you aren't smart enough to outgrow a trivial false dichotomy fallacy.

  • @ShadowZZZ
    @ShadowZZZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    This video reminds me of the videos series by King Crocoduck called "Quantum Theory Made Easy". In it, he presents the history and development of quantum mechanics, explaining the famous physicists' contributions on the way and touching upon the wave-particle duality of light and electrons. The only difference is that he didn't hold his promise to continue with the series, where the next topic would have been on the Schrödinger wave function. I have great hopes that you do

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Well, the pressure is on...I will hopefully not disappoint

    • @ShadowZZZ
      @ShadowZZZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos As someone who studies physics myself, I really love and admire your videos. It helps bridge the gap between facts you hear from popular science and hard scientific literature, in an easy to access and moderate to understand way. I just hope your channel grows more, because I watched all your current videos with attention and think they're gems.

    • @cylar159
      @cylar159 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos actually, we all still hope, that you will try somewhen go back to Schrödinger equation. Understanding of it's nature and beauty during my PHD course made me fan of quantum mechanics.

  • @AnirudhGiri
    @AnirudhGiri 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    45 minutes well spent :)
    Excellent video. Keep up the amazing work!

  • @PhilipePXF
    @PhilipePXF 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm late for this party, I know. but as a Chemist that loves Physics, and has been taking way more Physics' classes than needed, it's such a happy and heartwarming thing to see a video that combines both of my favorite areas of science being release on my birthday!!

  • @cannettedebiere
    @cannettedebiere 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is the exact level of physics and math I can understand (electronic engineer speaking). Thank you for making this mess so much clearer !

  • @adamboyd348
    @adamboyd348 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    What a huge amount of effort in a single video, thank you very much for uploading these, it’s truly great to be taken back through the derivations I brushed over during my undergraduate learning, and approach these topics from your unique perspective. Thanks!

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you very much for the kind feedback

  • @lukostello
    @lukostello 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I frequently put this on as a bedtime story hoping I'll gain understanding of it in my sleep

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's like hoping that you will gain an understanding about Little Red Riding Hood.

  • @sheiphanshaijan1249
    @sheiphanshaijan1249 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Hey man. Amazing video. Always waiting for your videos. Thanks. You take me to a journey I can't forget.

  • @Paul-fn2wb
    @Paul-fn2wb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wow, I've been waiting for your new video! Thank you for your work, man.

  • @alimmaqsa
    @alimmaqsa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This channel is one of the TH-cam hidden treasure.

  • @TheFerdi265
    @TheFerdi265 3 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Wonderful video! It's always a blast watching you take us on an adventure through the history of physics.
    The historical context often makes it much easier for me to remember what is what, and why it is that way.

  • @obst3085
    @obst3085 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Thank you very much, with your video you have done a great job (just like all the other ones you made!), also looking forward to that Schrödinger video. For most videos, I knew the basic results, but never the intensity of context and collaboration which went into making those discoveries possible, and I think that's one of the most unique things your channel highlights.

  • @jamesam003
    @jamesam003 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    This is so detailed and awesome! Amazing video brother. Thank you

  • @Hadi-zw9mb
    @Hadi-zw9mb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great and neat explanation, thank you. Today is also Schroedinger's birthday.

  • @stevenwonder7585
    @stevenwonder7585 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This channel is a physicist treasure trove. The best physics educator on this platform. I fell in love with physics due to my fascination with the nature of light; this video, with its masterful methods of instruction and display of ideas and formulae takes me back to that initial moment of wonder and joy. I can't thank you enough!!

  • @mahadlodhi
    @mahadlodhi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ughhh 43 minutes well spent, really filled with gratitude towards you for making such vids

  • @supreetsahu1964
    @supreetsahu1964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    So glad to see you back brother! I was starting to get worried :P you are the best science channel on this site btw, you always deliver really detailed and very interesting content

  • @Mayank-mf7xr
    @Mayank-mf7xr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    43 minutes well spent. This the quality content that is meant to be on TH-cam.

    • @PhysicsExplainedVideos
      @PhysicsExplainedVideos  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you enjoyed it!

    • @Mayank-mf7xr
      @Mayank-mf7xr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PhysicsExplainedVideos Thank you for making such masterpieces. Hardwork that goes behind these works shows.

  • @renzostefanmp7937
    @renzostefanmp7937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As a physics student, I can say the best videos on these themes are to be found in this channel. Thank you for such a great work!

  • @DiwasTimilsina
    @DiwasTimilsina 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    dude, your ability to create these visuals to exactly show what you are talking about is remarkable!
    Love your videos, thanks for making them!

  • @zlatanibrahimovic8329
    @zlatanibrahimovic8329 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Underrated af

  • @JamesThompson-xn2jv
    @JamesThompson-xn2jv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As someone who studies on their own simply for the love of it; you're amazing. You explain things well, in a language that is simple to understand.
    Fantastic video!!

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also completely wrong. There are no particles and many quanta don't make waves. They make cheese. And tungsten metal cubes. And a copy of "Gone with the Wind". And an infinity of other solids, liquids, gases, plasmas etc.. ;-)

  • @MrZWolfy
    @MrZWolfy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just found your videos and your laid back yet concise storytelling helps a lot. Really looking forward to your take on the Schrödinger equation.
    Thanks for refreshing and consolidating QM knowledge!
    And happy new year! :D

  • @matarnold5004
    @matarnold5004 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    These videos are really excellent, and clearly a lot of effort goes into them. I hope you are able to continue, I'm looking forward to it!

  • @datsmydab-minecraft-and-mo5666
    @datsmydab-minecraft-and-mo5666 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have to admit that this channel is so fantastic, you leave me with no words, please continue making videos in this kind of style, they take things to another level of depth.

    • @sadovniksocratus1375
      @sadovniksocratus1375 ปีที่แล้ว

      Quantum Light (h) is a dualistic quantum particle that in the cosmic vacuum
      can fly at a constant speed (c=1). In this movement, light uses its linear spin
      and it does not produce electromagnetic waves. Light behaves like a corpuscular.
      But light can behave like a wave if it uses its angular rotation (the torque required
      to accelerate angularly around the axis of rotation). In this situation, the speed
      of the light is faster than the constant. The speed is c>1.
      This situation is explained by Lorentz transformations.
      The problem is that we do not know the geometric shape of the light quantum.

  • @jocelbartolay4861
    @jocelbartolay4861 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    It made me recall Quantum Theory Made Easy by King Crocoduck. The voice, as well as the sentence construction, are really similar. It's great I have subscribed to you. Your videos are surely great. Keep up the good work!

  • @AZ-vy4gl
    @AZ-vy4gl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like I am there as the researcher making each discovery in history when I listen to this channel. Stellar work.

  • @ElVerdaderoAbejorro
    @ElVerdaderoAbejorro 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    My man, you are going to reach a million subscribers easily... Best physics channel on TH-cam hands down. You are the only one that actually explain things in detail and with math, without trying to dumb things down or make everything quick for the short attention span kids to be happy. Keep it up!!!

  • @omarhernandez5675
    @omarhernandez5675 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I put your videos on to fall asleep to. Not because they’re boring, I put them on audio only and imagine everything you’re saying and it helps me fall asleep so much faster. Thank you for these videos

  • @imaseeker100
    @imaseeker100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've watched dozens of lectures and videos relating to this principle and this one was just fabulous in every way

  • @MarceloRobertoJimenez
    @MarceloRobertoJimenez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Awesome! Congratulations for your videos!

  • @richardcoppin5332
    @richardcoppin5332 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is at exactly the level of detail I'm looking for. Most science channels once found are presented either like a PhD in physics where it's too detailed to follow, or like a museum tour on the history of science which is interesting but mostly useless.

  • @yknx4
    @yknx4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I was supposed to go to sleep 3 hours ago. Somehow I'm about to watch just one last before sleep. This is addictive

  • @timvw01
    @timvw01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very high quality. Really love the historic story behind our knowledge of physics. Thanks. Light is fascinating.

  • @ricardasist
    @ricardasist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Great learning material

  • @drakeh3839
    @drakeh3839 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your videos are on a different level dude. So informative yet so clear and digestible

  • @Nitram21uk21
    @Nitram21uk21 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If Scott Manley posted this it would have 25M views......Great Vid my friend....deserves more respect...imo

  • @cirdiam1800
    @cirdiam1800 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Very well done!!

  • @jayyadav1610
    @jayyadav1610 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you vey much,this is probably the most beautiful video that ive seen on youtube ever probably,i just realised how connected everything was due to the historical aspect you present in this video.Everything now is more clear than ever and now i hope to study everything more deeply with a better understanding.

  • @dankuchar6821
    @dankuchar6821 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I enjoy your in-depth content. Please make more!

  • @ableone7855
    @ableone7855 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A great presentation. One of the finest narration and explanation techniques. Thanks from the USA. Looking forward for more!

  • @badrinair
    @badrinair 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am going to share this channel as much as I can .

  • @eviebrody
    @eviebrody 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your videos so much - they’re so calming and are one of my favorite things to fall asleep to, as well as obv being super well put-together and informative :]

  • @addy7464
    @addy7464 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the best physics channels on youtube..... Thanks for all your help.

  • @ajj4207
    @ajj4207 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You did an AWESOME Job, I enjoyed this very MUCH. Very cool. Learned so much finer details in this subject. Thank you, keep up the positive vibrations.

  • @midnightrider1100
    @midnightrider1100 ปีที่แล้ว

    Some of these videos the guys talk so fast your brain can't keep up. This speaker uses great pacing and pauses along with the diagrams conducive to learning. Enjoyed this video.

  • @vm-bz1cd
    @vm-bz1cd 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are awesome! I wish I had had you as my physics teacher 40 years ago... i now realize what little I “learnt” then...

  • @dwaynegardner2365
    @dwaynegardner2365 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m just catching this video now. I wish I’d discovered it earlier. It’s excellent. Thank you.

  • @jeremykeetch7213
    @jeremykeetch7213 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An incredible summary of the progression of our understanding of light. Your videos are great, and I hope you make more.

  • @jvergel
    @jvergel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    All your videos are amazing. Keep up the great work!

  • @ernieengineer3462
    @ernieengineer3462 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You’re a born teacher. I also enjoy your Cool Worlds channel. Thanks for sharing your passion with the rest of us.

  • @roblouw1344
    @roblouw1344 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your lectures never cease to amaze me!

  • @surajgupta-me7zl
    @surajgupta-me7zl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very comprehensive vedio ..I loveed it

  • @EannaButler
    @EannaButler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Agree with all the positive comments. Discovered your channel earlier this week. Easiest subscription from me for a long while...

  • @mpicos100
    @mpicos100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the Schrödinger quote if great. Fantastic video (I am watching all of them!)

  • @sherry26
    @sherry26 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome job. Hats off. Waiting eagerly for ur next assignment.

  • @NalitaQubit
    @NalitaQubit 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing thorough work. Thank you, it was very helpful.

  • @tarikavdovic9267
    @tarikavdovic9267 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Finally new one

  • @nithinhm13
    @nithinhm13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A beautifully presented video. I loved this. ❤️
    Your way of blending history and science with neat derivations wherever appropriate makes this truly a gem of a video.
    In my head, I could see jigsaw pieces neatly falling into place.
    The idea that the interpretation of the debroglie wavelength lead to the introduction of quantum mechanics blew me away; an absolute "aha" moment!! 🤩
    I'm so thrilled that I finally understand what's the motivation behind the introduction of the wavefunction!
    Thank you so much for this brilliant video. 🥰 Please do keep making more of these. 😊🤝

  • @60pluscrazy
    @60pluscrazy 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is exactly what I was looking for..amazingly well documented and explained chronologically... THANKS 🎉🎉🎉

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's just too bad that it's wrong. ;-)

  • @robertglas5854
    @robertglas5854 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation of this complex matter!

  • @ferrocell_usa
    @ferrocell_usa ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent presentation and explanation.

  • @awolgeordie9926
    @awolgeordie9926 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great stuff man. Might show this in our AS Physics class on Diffraction.

  • @nowthenad3286
    @nowthenad3286 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mate! This video is phenomenal!

  • @bobatenin
    @bobatenin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a beautiful voice and wonderful explanations! I’m in love with your videos!

  • @michaellogan9335
    @michaellogan9335 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is actually really good.

  • @gotv6879
    @gotv6879 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    brilliant video .. thanks

  • @calamariaxo
    @calamariaxo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So damn good. Can't wait for more.

  • @eternalblue4660
    @eternalblue4660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very interesting and informative. Thank you for the in-depth video 😊

  • @fabslyrics
    @fabslyrics 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Magnifique cette video , merci mon ami !

  • @nemo4evr
    @nemo4evr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Once more thank you for this lectures. Cheers from Canada

  • @rtleitao78
    @rtleitao78 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is incredibly well explained

  • @stevenschilizzi4104
    @stevenschilizzi4104 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is truly a stupendous explanation, the best I’ve ever come across yet. No other presentation made it so clear that the crux of the probabilistic (Born) interpretation of the electron’s wave function originates in the relationship between the intensity of (any) wave and the square of its amplitude. If one doesn’t know that (from classical physics) the whole thing remains somewhat mysterious. That “analogy” was the theoretical leap in De Broglie’s mind that really needed highlighting, and you do just that. No wonder that Einstein himself was awed by De Broglie’s insight. It was then a matter of dotting the i’s and crossing thet’s for Max Born to add, almost as a post-scriptum: Oh and by the way the square of the amplitude of the quantum wavefunction Psi represents the probability of finding the particle if we look for it. Thanks for this very pedagogical and enlightening exposition. All teachers of physics and the students they teach will be able to benefit from it.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 ปีที่แล้ว

      In other words, you don't know shit about quantum mechanics. ;-)

  • @oleran4569
    @oleran4569 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh my! What a great job you've done! Thank You!

  • @snowrider9995
    @snowrider9995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am about to complete my master's, I must say your videos are an easy way for me to revise the essential history of physics. I always love how you mention all the steps and leave nothing to the readers. If you were to become a physicist(if you aren't yet) you will be a really good one. I wish to talk to you, can I personally talk to you?

  • @MrAlasoft
    @MrAlasoft 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent ! .. funny .. clear and very very educational !
    Congrats !

  • @shubhamkumar-nw1ui
    @shubhamkumar-nw1ui 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    On binge watch.... thank you for all the efforts

  • @hgtrad7655
    @hgtrad7655 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant work, I have followed many of your videos and having a srong knowledge in electromagnetics, Maxwell, Stokes, Poisson divergence, gradient, vector potential et al, I could understand 100% of your expose on Schrodinger and Heisenberg equations. Remarkable way of leading the explanation you never loose sight of the relevant points although there are plenty of details. Thank you for your great work!!

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So you know how to solve Maxwell's equations? Please show. ;-)

  • @jamesnasmith984
    @jamesnasmith984 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant graphics. Superb script, flawlessly articulated. 5/5.

  • @mohamedmouh3949
    @mohamedmouh3949 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    amaizing detail. thank you so much

  • @aidalf1912
    @aidalf1912 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    your videos help me so much man. thank you

  • @ronmron5007
    @ronmron5007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good experience

  • @youtubeuser6067
    @youtubeuser6067 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent!

  • @GalileosTelescope
    @GalileosTelescope 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, your videos are great! I'm always looking forward to more. I was wondering if you have any advice on how to get people interested in physics to know about your channel? I noticed your channel is fairly new, but you managed to get good viewership quickly. I just started a physics channel too, but I don't really know how to get people who might be interested to know about it. Thanks, and keep up the good work!

  • @DimitrisGerakaris
    @DimitrisGerakaris 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I feel like when QM is taught nowadays there's nowhere near enough emphasis given to how we came up with it in the first place. Not by saying "this guy studied that other guy's notes and they all magically had the answer" but by presenting the whole series of discoveries since we've started looking, step by step, just like this video does

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's science history and not science. What that does for you is to reinforce mistakes of other people that were caused by a lack of evidence at that time in your mind. Not a good way of learning actual physics. You can only learn physics properly by starting with the latest set of evidence and then you don't have to go down some of the rabbit holes of the past.

  • @NoahSpurrier
    @NoahSpurrier 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a very good video.