The explanation/simplification of the geological timescale was great and the delivery was even better. You have a fantastic sense of humour! You have a fan here.
I've been watching prehistoric info videos lately, to familiarise myself with it in English (I was a huge dinosaur nerd as a child in Norway a couple decades ago). I've noticed that people often shorten things into "The mesozoic" or "The triassic" instead of saying the full title (period, era, etc). Neve noticed that in Norwegian. Is that just for convenience or is there another reason? Just wondering :)
Not sure if it’s a difference in language etiquette but saying the period/eon/epoch one is referring to has always been what I’ve learnt to do. It’s probably also for convenience tbh
I’m gonna go for a nice round 6000 years ago or a date at which farming, larger scale hunting n settling had begun to have a bigger effect on the environment
@@yazlikes_oldstuff Yes, I think about 4000BC would work because it coincides with the start of civilization. From what I have read it seems like they will go for 1945 but as time goes on I think the Atomic Age is a more and more apt name for this current age.
@@yazlikes_oldstuff it would be more accurate to do a study on hominids and their genetic evolution into homo sapiens. Even though the Anthropocene takes place well after that it would help isolate technological and political development. It begins in the later Miocene (genetically), then Pliocene (technologically) and most notably the Pleistocene (which coincides with the upper Paleolithic to about 10,000 y.a.). Between the Paleolithic or old Stone Age and the new Stone Age, Neolithic, we actually get a period where agriculture isn't necessarily the biggest development. Between 10,000 b.c.e. and 5,000 b.c.e there's a ton of political development and "village" architectural creation. It doesn't necessarily coincide with an expansion of agriculture, per se, but rather intra-human conflict and war. In her analysis of Plato's Timeus and Critias Mary Settegast talks a fair bit about that period in her book 'Plato Prehistorian'. Other than some archeological nuances, and advancements in carbon-dating technologies, generally her hypothesis has held up. Anyways, the permanent usage of agriculture is certainly important for the foundation of high cultural civilization, like the Chalcolithic and Bronze Age that come after the Stone ages. However, we see plenty of domestication of animals, castle architecture and even gardening and agricultural developments well before that in the time of 20,000-6,000 B.C.E.. That's just my 2 cents.
@@yazlikes_oldstuff it seems like you're actually an archeologist. Didn't check out the rest of your channel, sorry. Your channel seems quaint and interesting. Keep it up.
The explanation/simplification of the geological timescale was great and the delivery was even better. You have a fantastic sense of humour! You have a fan here.
The presentation is ridiculous and totally charming. Info seems legit. Approve.
Aw just what I was going for, thanks
I’ve been looking for an overview of this info forever, thank you!
Thanks I was lil confused about the timescale and I havw a presentation tomorrow. So yeah, you just saved my life🙏🙏
im so glad I could help
I liked everything u did and how u explain it. I also liked you for being who you are. Keep going. We need things like this. Thank you this 🌹.
I've been watching prehistoric info videos lately, to familiarise myself with it in English (I was a huge dinosaur nerd as a child in Norway a couple decades ago).
I've noticed that people often shorten things into "The mesozoic" or "The triassic" instead of saying the full title (period, era, etc). Neve noticed that in Norwegian. Is that just for convenience or is there another reason? Just wondering :)
Not sure if it’s a difference in language etiquette but saying the period/eon/epoch one is referring to has always been what I’ve learnt to do. It’s probably also for convenience tbh
You’re too pretty!! I got too distracted😂
Gorgonopsids.
such sweeties weren't they?
@@yazlikes_oldstuff I dont know. I never saw one alive. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But the virtual reconstructions of the lil sabre tooth lizard doggos give us a good picture
@@yazlikes_oldstuff They possibly had fur, like modern mammals. We will never know.
Indeed we shall never know 😪
Great job. Love the delivery. Thanks for the info.
This was too cute for youtube. Really enjoyed the lesson. haha, period in red hahaha
I understand your explanations, and you are so cool!
Amazing video very well explained very simple to understand
That was wonderful. Thanks
White boards = underrated
Great video thanks !!
Thank you, I needed that 😅
Thanks for the video !
In HIP-HOP we have the GOLDEN ERA.
Ur not wrong bro
When do you think the start of the Anthropocene should be?
I’m gonna go for a nice round 6000 years ago or a date at which farming, larger scale hunting n settling had begun to have a bigger effect on the environment
@@yazlikes_oldstuff Yes, I think about 4000BC would work because it coincides with the start of civilization. From what I have read it seems like they will go for 1945 but as time goes on I think the Atomic Age is a more and more apt name for this current age.
@@yazlikes_oldstuff it would be more accurate to do a study on hominids and their genetic evolution into homo sapiens. Even though the Anthropocene takes place well after that it would help isolate technological and political development.
It begins in the later Miocene (genetically), then Pliocene (technologically) and most notably the Pleistocene (which coincides with the upper Paleolithic to about 10,000 y.a.). Between the Paleolithic or old Stone Age and the new Stone Age, Neolithic, we actually get a period where agriculture isn't necessarily the biggest development. Between 10,000 b.c.e. and 5,000 b.c.e there's a ton of political development and "village" architectural creation. It doesn't necessarily coincide with an expansion of agriculture, per se, but rather intra-human conflict and war. In her analysis of Plato's Timeus and Critias Mary Settegast talks a fair bit about that period in her book 'Plato Prehistorian'. Other than some archeological nuances, and advancements in carbon-dating technologies, generally her hypothesis has held up. Anyways, the permanent usage of agriculture is certainly important for the foundation of high cultural civilization, like the Chalcolithic and Bronze Age that come after the Stone ages. However, we see plenty of domestication of animals, castle architecture and even gardening and agricultural developments well before that in the time of 20,000-6,000 B.C.E..
That's just my 2 cents.
@@yazlikes_oldstuff it seems like you're actually an archeologist. Didn't check out the rest of your channel, sorry. Your channel seems quaint and interesting. Keep it up.
Brilliant
I'm seriously crushing on you.
I think you are amazing. I just have to say.
I SUBSCRIBED
good editing
Thankss 💫
I knew the Info but I watched whole video just for how beautiful are you and top of that you have intrest in these topics.👍
th-cam.com/users/shorts3EnVO76vQUw?feature=share
slay
big slay
If I make 😂 this in exam , my teacher will give me 0 marks.
Are you pleiadian? Or lyro-arcturian?
Very darling girl.