@@Andrew-ob5ij what? You mean, the part of uk law pertaining to the 1951 refugee convention? Is that the part you mean? You mean where it states asylum in first safe country they reach? That part of the convention?
And what would you do? Stop in Hungary? I’m not even sure when being an ‘economic migrant’ became such a dirty word. Absolute disgraceful policy. Whatever your thoughts on immigration levels, this is a disgusting abuse of human rights.
@@MB-rd2by they could have seek it in France,but they didn't. Instead they wanted come here illegally without any documents to get all benefits.Its a massive slap to those immigrants who come here legally and struggles to get those benefits cause they chose do it legal way.
1 Lincoln Clay Fuk what you saying it here 😠 th-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/w-d-xo.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
'The first flight taking asylum seekers to Rwanda' They're not asylum seekers, they're failed asylum seekers, many of whom have illegally entered from France, a safe country.
That doesn't mean you're not an asylum seeker. The international convention for seeking asylum clearly states that an asylum seeker can seek asylum in the country of their choice and not the first safe one. We have been apart of this agreement for something like 70 years now. So yes they legally are asylum seekers.
@Eternal Ments so are they going to the UK to be on benefits or to steal jobs? It can't be both. Especially since UK law precludes most non-citizens from accessing benefits.
They obviously are not seeking safety - if that were the case then they would stay in France. There is no need for them to come to the U.K. so there is absolutely no issue with the removal plan. I can’t believe people would protest against this!!
Have you read the agreement? S16 says the UK have to take Rwandan refugees on a one for one basis at our expense and process them then the will live in the UK on top of the £120,000,000 we paid to send a handful on a plane to Rwanda. Great deal. So will you be putting your name down to take a Rwandan refugee since you are so very happy with this deal?
The Russians have invaded Ukraine. There is effectively war in Ukraine as a result. This is reported on various media sources not just British. Anyway this is beside the point, this is in relation to migrants that cross the channel who have already reached France!
yeah idk about you but i think that sending people fleeing war to a country that is still troubled by war (with drc) and has a dictator and is very poor is a bad thing.
1 Blue Cheese Fuk what you saying it here 😠 th-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/w-d-xo.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
Don't get me wrong here, I feel sorry for all refugees and I am by no means racist in any shape or form but honestly the UK cannot continue to allow people into our country. We are a small island we cannot look after our own let alone take more people in. We don't have enough social housing. We need to look after our own. We have people born and bred in the UK that are sleeping on the streets. Again I cannot stress how bad I feel for these people but enough is enough. No country has the right to tell us what we should be doing. Working class people are struggling as it is without us being taxed to keep more people that are flooding in. Eventually this island will not beable to sustain the population here. This needs to be carefully noted. The population here is already rising at an alarming rate. Our future is quite scary when you look at it properly. I believe that Boris etc have made the right decision and should continue to fill those planes with illegals and any others trying to enter the U.K.
I'll be honest mate, chartering a £500,000 flight and sending £120 million to Rwanda for the 6 people that are currently flying doesn't seem that beneficial for the UK public. Instead of that money being used to help "People here" it's being wasted sending people away. I very much doubt those 6 people would have been more of a cost to house than the millions spend sending them to Rwanda. It's literally been done to fool people into not questioning the numbers behind it.
@@Rozzajames no they won't lol, its literally run by a dictator and they have 0.5% of our GDP, which is again most likely to be far less than the country they've escaped.
@@northernhardcore.7899 No idea ... asked many people what is up with me and so many answers I am spoilt for choice... Why what ? Or do you have a question at all ? We can play the word games BUT it might not work out for you... It might BUT then again it might not.... Your choice. What do you think is up with me ? Now do not assume as that makes an ASS out of U not ME.... If you have no point then you made it very well... Congrats. Now any person thinking they can do better ... Bring it on... I am open to sensible questions.... You can even insult me and at worst I will cry. How did you do Northern hardcore... feeling better now or worse ? Take your fingers to the keyboard and ask a question... I will answer the question.... Its so so simple . You can do it I have faith.
That's right, keep sending hundreds of millions of taxpayers pounds to Ukraine. Cherry-o. It's not like the UK has an inflation crisis worse than any European country, it's not like many UK citizens could become migrants soon if they can't afford to live as prices are rising faster. All's well and good.
People asking for the government to crack down harder on illegal immigrants are the same people complaining about this being unfair. Simple message for illegal immigrants if you chance it then expect the consequences. Fully agree with the tories on this.
Israel had this program, but found that the Rwandan government exploited the refugees. They were human trafficked into prostitution & slavery. Israel stopped it. Rwanda then turned to the UK to make up for the profit loss.
You can guarantee there’s none living near her. She’s one of the ones that wants them all to come but not in her area. Bet she has 1 friend of colour max.
The majority of asylum seekers do settle in the first safe country they reach (usually Italy, Greece, Hungary or Croatia), but others have family elsewhere, or specific language skills, and continue on to places like the UK. That's necessary actually because the border countries couldn't possibly take all the people in need of shelter. On top of that, and only God knows why, but around the world many people still see the UK as iconic for democracy, justice and freedom. That attracts people ready and willing to make a success of themselves. Someone should tell them we're just racist b******* who'd rather they drown at sea than make a contribution to our economy. Still, it's up to the person making their life in a new country. Under international law, you can choose where you settle, it doesn't have to be the first safe country, and in fact it can't be because, as mentioned before, everyone would end up in the same few countries and they couldn't possibly process everyone. Heck, if Russia decided to drop a nuclear bomb on the UK, I'd flee wherever I could, but if it turned out I couldn't return for a long time, I'd think seriously about which country I really want to settle in long-term. Anyone would.
Try entering New Zealand illegally .. just turn up on a beach and see what happends !!! NO support ,NO free food free accommodation, free heating, free electricity, free healthcare, free dentist, free spending money, free TV licence
@@lemcakes32422 we dont have teleportation in Ukraine. if somebody decided to go there (which is pretty far) they probably had a reason (probably some relatives or friends) and booked a flight.
My sister is in Finland and saw a ship of REAL refugees from Ukraine which are all children/women/elderly. Look at these all these males, who just abandon their country instead of trying to change it. We should send these people back so that we can help as many Ukrainian refugees as we can.
It's so so easy to compare isn't it? How about more context - who would you fight in Syria? Join the terrorists to fight assad, join assad's terrible regime to fight the terrorirst? These places have been in constant conflict for decades, there's no clear enemy as it is in Ukraine, is there? The travel is also hugely more costly and dangerous, of course you'd send the person more likely to survive and then bring the rest of the family wouldn't you? Ukrainians are safe once they cross the border, you got Polish, Romanian, Moldavian people waiting for them to help them through or give them shelter in their own homes. Do people from Africa or Middle East get the same?
100% correct, I remember the French government many years ago stated that the reason they want to come here is for the generous benefits on offer & that the UK needs to significantly reduce the handouts.
Yes like the British always did occupying other countries and taking care of only the British.. and now they can’t support 7 people after looting Africa Asia for 300 years ..
Are you dumb, the more migrants there are in the UK the more they fill up low-skill jobs that most Brits are unwilling to do which helps the economy. Migrants are essential to a functioning economy
@Dannii Try On Haul 📺 France doesn't have to take them back, unfortunately. They only had to under EU regulation and with the UK no longer being in the EU...
@Dannii Try On Haul 📺 It's a pretty shitty deal that way. And the flight was grounded by the ECHR, so we'll have to wait and see what's gonna come of this.
Price Charles, Bishops and all the people outside court should be taken to Dover to meet our guests. They could then take them to their homes, feed them, clothe them, educate them and treat their sicknesses. The guests could earn their keep by baby sitting their daughters. Don't complain do something to help the same as we do for Ukrainians
Only 7 people? That is not efficient at all, a whole flight for 7 people, what an ecological disaster. The plane must be full, I am sure there are many more illegal immigrants that must be processed. The arch bishop of Canterbury, should shut up, the people are being processed, the 1951 convention is being abided by. The high court has given the OK for these people to have their asylum claims dealt with in Rwanda.
All these public figures objecting to the scheme never come up with an alternative. We are a very small island which is already super saturated with immigrants.
Maybe if you watched the video you would have seen that one of them proposed the government setting up safe routes as opposed to using a load of tax payer money fly people around the world
Super saturated with migrants . . . Please lose me on that cop out. Per the UNHCR: "The vast majority of refugees - 4 out of 5 - stay in their region of displacement, and consequently are hosted by developing countries. Turkey now hosts the highest number of refugees with 3.7 million, followed by Colombia with 1.7 million." A quarter of Lebanon's population is refugees and the UK (and other developed countries, ehem, the US) can't bother to pitch in the bare minimum w/o concocting a cockamamie scheme like this.
1 Philip Harris Fuk what you saying it here 😠 th-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/w-d-xo.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
“The policy is dividing public opinion”?Not really. Nearly everyone agrees with it (however late this solution is) apart from the odd dingbat, leftie or liberal media type.
Flying 7 people out on a 270 person jet all the way to Africa?? Might as well buy them a house here, itll cost the taxpayer less money. That’s without mentioning the £100’s of millions that’ll be spent in Rwanda itself. Half of them will be flown back again once they complete the paperwork anyway, that’s the point in “offshore processing”. What a joke
Interesting, maybe they forget passports and refused boarding , 100s of empty seats ? What about carbon footprint , any that come today should go straight to the airport to fill the empties , that is the speed required
Quite Kev, we now have the likes of the Bishop of Southwark and his cronies sticking their beaks in, spouting their usual tripe. Maybe they will adopt a few dinghy divers, even open up the church for them to abide in !
@@Andrew-ob5ij cool, they can learn it just like they learned english, language is not a right of passage, i speak english does that mean i can demand australia let me in and live there for free?
I'm sure the cultural enrichment will put Rwanda on the map, and the influx of immigrants is sure to make it a powerhouse. After all, immigration is good! These asylum seekers should be ecstatic that they can get out of the French warzone and into a safe secure country like Rwanda.
Well done Pritti and Boris and that’s why the hard-working normal people of this country love you!! And by the way if the Scottish want them send them up there..
Are you aware that the government has signed a recipricol agreement witrh Rwanda ? The Uk has agreed to take people from Rwanda with complex mental and physical healtrh issues. If you dont believe me may I suggest that you do your own independent research.
@@Whoami691 There are several articles online. Even the Mail on line reported it in April. I am not in the habit of just making things up and thgen posting it online!
@LiveYourLifeBeFree People will just believe what they want to if it fits their own narritive. The UK has also agreed a huge aid package to Rwanda. I have got nothing against foriegn aid myself but to try and say that this whole thing is about trying to save the UK money is utter rubbish. I think it was obvious that Rwanda would not have agreed to all of this unless there was something in it for them.
It is so satisfying to here all legal challenges rejected. About time this government did something positive in stopping my country being over run by these scroungers.
At least somethings being done to get these people from the war torn Northern French coast to safety......better weather than the UK in Rwanda anyway. If I could chose between staying in the Travelodge in the outskirts of Dover or a trip to Africa I know what I'd do.
Well they shouldn't be left just to wander around unchecked in public. It only takes one to get through and cause havoc and that's one too many. Can't take those chances anymore. It's for the government to solve, but they won't, it'll just create trouble as usual and we have to pay for it.
I would love to fly to Rwanda and free, these asylum seekers are lucky, they have nothing to complain about, salute from spain to my fellow british people
The Left are now opposed to immigration..........well, to Rwanda. They're now concerned about cost and what's unlawful..........when they never gave a damn about it before!
its a one way ticket to a dictatorial regime that has literally opened fire on refugees when this was tested before, they have 0.5% of our GDP. i think there's something to complain about...
"37 asylum seekers arrived yesterday from france, a safe country" They are not asylum seekers by your own words Beeb. Edit: Stop calling them Asylum seekers, they are not that no matter how many times you repeat the lie.
@@kostasl5922 ELI5: Someone seeking asylum is supposed to stop in the first safe country and apply for asylum. Someone who comes over illegaly in a dingy and dumps thier ID/Passport in the channel is not 'seeking asylum', they are economic migrants, they are not 'fleeing war torn syria' as they could have stopped at france, or any of the many other safe countries they passed through. So yeah, an asylum seeker is generaly seeking asylum, not 'better prospects'.
1 T Iger Fuk what you saying it here 😠 th-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/w-d-xo.html Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖 los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
It's kind of contradictory for France to call itself a safe country when they sit and watch as these people are transported on a dangerous journey across the Channel. Sounds more like "Safe to pass through, just don't stop here."
@@saveandinvestwithgiorgiolo8375 it’s not our fault that people don’t wanna leave. Maybe if other countries didn’t treat them like shit they all wouldn’t wanna come to UK and we could spread them around abit but then again no other countries are gonna opt for that cause why would they when they can just watch them all come to the UK
@@B33FY97 France Germany and Italy are taking in for more of these migrants and when the UK was part of the Dublin Convention France along with other EU/EEA countries had a legal obligation not to allow them to go to another EU country and ask for asylum in the first country of arrival. As the UK is now a third country this is no longer the case.
@@saveandinvestwithgiorgiolo8375 France and Germany are MUCH bigger with much lower population density. If you want all countries to take same amount it shows your low iq
Hands up all those who don’t want to go to Rwanda. Now show us your passport to start the immigration process . What do you mean you destroyed it on purpose so that you could claim benefits. Next applicant please.
Because English is a universal language that some of them speak and as a Nation we are seen as fair, just and civilised. These people have been fed a dream that is far from the truth. But they will find out that this country is racist,unjust and far from civilised. They are not fleeing France they have been trafficked to the UK by gangs . When Russia drops a big bomb on London and people want to go to Eire to be safe the only way is by a rubber boat ,then you might understand.
Social care police first responders nhs and many more are stretched to the limit not enough money to look after the country's own people never mind the whole world we simply cannot look after everyone there's not enough housing either
We Uk taxpayers are already paying way too much tax to the government. Is it right to ask British to pay more and more tax to help these people without a valid reason to settle in the uk and add that burden also to tax payers? Everything from legal fees that spent to deal with illegal immigrants is a cost to the taxpayers. It’s a blessing to immigration lawyers as they can claim legal aid.
Well your government should have thought about that before they colonised the whole world. Send them back with the gold and diamonds your country took from them. And do not forget about all the ports in Africa you annexed. You annexed all the minerals in their country.
This is such a great policy for people of colour, and a huge win for BLM! It's great to see the government partnering up with an African country like this and investing money into the Rwanda economy. The government has always said it was anti-racism, but moves like this really show their commitment to anti-racism.
I dont think UK state budget cant afford to send them all back. In last 70 years hordes came, cities like Londonistan and Birghingamstan are waiting for clean sweep.
why did we give France 54 million quid ? I am sure it wasn't for looking the other way. Would be worth the risk to use the border patrol water taxi to turn them around and take them straight back to France
@@historickeeper You might want to look at the agreement - it doesn't say what you claim. Leaving the EU removed their incentive as the Dublin agreement no longer applies.
Protecting our border isn't anything to do with racism - when are the woke lefties, going to understand this. We don't have room or the infrastructure for thousands of daily illegal asylum seekers. What about the health and living standards of British citizens, don't WE matter? Even if there is only one illegal on that flight tonight, I will applaud and hope it acts as a deterrent.
If safety is what they need then France, where they came from is as safe as they need it to be. People work and pay taxes so that a nations benefits from it and not someone who came on a rubber boat and starts claiming benefits. Will you let a thief stay in your loft and eat all you have in the kitchen daily? If people feel that it is ok for these people to live here then I feel that anyone can live in anyone's house and eat all they can and take what they can.
I know right they take like 0.00001 of your taxes for giving people who aren't born in privilege like you some hope. Nah just send them back that'll solve everything...
The vastly overpopulated UK can take no more of this insanity, our once wonderful country is systematically being destroyed financially, culturally and ethnically. Absolutely deplorable.
Ronald you are an ignorant. Britain colonised countries, loot, raped and killed. Britain was built on free slave labour. Any person from any country colonised by Britain deserve to be in Britain.
Well ethnically your ancestors already changed plenty of times and culture changes every generation. For example, you're not the same people who built Stonehenge although you are descendants of them. You don't speak their language, or have their religious beliefs. That culture is lost to time. Likewise, your descendants won't be exactly like you. They may even be part South Asian or African. There's really no way to ensure that it won't happen. You can influence your kids but that may not even work.
Umm umm umm Australia has nothing to do with this, Australia stopped refugee boats arriving because children were drowning on the high seas in large numbers, she didn't mention that.
What's so unsafe about France? There's literally no valid reason to cross the channel.
I thought France was war torn and facing famine the way these men are all fleeing it and the media support them.
Garlic breath
Under uk law they can. Whatever happened to uk living by uk made law? 🤔
@@Andrew-ob5ij what? You mean, the part of uk law pertaining to the 1951 refugee convention? Is that the part you mean? You mean where it states asylum in first safe country they reach? That part of the convention?
its full of french people
To reach the UK they must’ve all come through safe EU countries
Which does not matter
And what would you do? Stop in Hungary? I’m not even sure when being an ‘economic migrant’ became such a dirty word. Absolute disgraceful policy. Whatever your thoughts on immigration levels, this is a disgusting abuse of human rights.
@@yellowgreen5229 yes it dose idiot
@@yellowgreen5229 its about benifits not safety
@@MB-rd2by they could have seek it in France,but they didn't. Instead they wanted come here illegally without any documents to get all benefits.Its a massive slap to those immigrants who come here legally and struggles to get those benefits cause they chose do it legal way.
There's not enough of them going
1 Lincoln Clay Fuk what you saying it here 😠 th-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/w-d-xo.html
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
Interesting piece of blatant racism. Thanks for being so open about it!
Spot on . Send them ALL . Even ones with citizenship
@@retrowatches1655 yeh boris is american send him
Not enough of you going embarrassment that you are.
'The first flight taking asylum seekers to Rwanda'
They're not asylum seekers, they're failed asylum seekers, many of whom have illegally entered from France, a safe country.
They're not failed, as their cases haven't been processed.
That doesn't mean you're not an asylum seeker. The international convention for seeking asylum clearly states that an asylum seeker can seek asylum in the country of their choice and not the first safe one. We have been apart of this agreement for something like 70 years now. So yes they legally are asylum seekers.
@@dylaanowen well the UK is tired 😪 the policy has to change just like any laws.
There is no legal requirement for asylum seekers to settle in the first safe country they find themselves in. That's Tory propaganda.
@Eternal Ments so are they going to the UK to be on benefits or to steal jobs? It can't be both. Especially since UK law precludes most non-citizens from accessing benefits.
They obviously are not seeking safety - if that were the case then they would stay in France. There is no need for them to come to the U.K. so there is absolutely no issue with the removal plan. I can’t believe people would protest against this!!
they are fleeing ukraine
Have you read the agreement? S16 says the UK have to take Rwandan refugees on a one for one basis at our expense and process them then the will live in the UK on top of the £120,000,000 we paid to send a handful on a plane to Rwanda. Great deal. So will you be putting your name down to take a Rwandan refugee since you are so very happy with this deal?
@@lemcakes32422 Those are not the one being rejected
@@lewismiller870 why not? theres no war in kyiv like british media said
The Russians have invaded Ukraine. There is effectively war in Ukraine as a result. This is reported on various media sources not just British. Anyway this is beside the point, this is in relation to migrants that cross the channel who have already reached France!
The 38 that arrived here yesterday should be put straight on that flight
You should be put on the next one. Gammons are an embarrassment to this country.
Love how the BBC tries to portray this as a bad thing. No surprises there!
If you re a c*nt with no shred of human decency, I can see how hat could be surprising!
BBC is the home of virtue signalling
@@joemoore7447 And TH-cam is the home of gutless racist little c*nts :)...and Russian bots
yeah idk about you but i think that sending people fleeing war to a country that is still troubled by war (with drc) and has a dictator and is very poor is a bad thing.
Far Leftist be like that.
WHAT VULNERABLE PEOPLE ????
They’ve come from FRANCE !!!!!!
1 Blue Cheese Fuk what you saying it here 😠 th-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/w-d-xo.html
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
Don't get me wrong here, I feel sorry for all refugees and I am by no means racist in any shape or form but honestly the UK cannot continue to allow people into our country. We are a small island we cannot look after our own let alone take more people in. We don't have enough social housing. We need to look after our own. We have people born and bred in the UK that are sleeping on the streets. Again I cannot stress how bad I feel for these people but enough is enough. No country has the right to tell us what we should be doing. Working class people are struggling as it is without us being taxed to keep more people that are flooding in. Eventually this island will not beable to sustain the population here. This needs to be carefully noted. The population here is already rising at an alarming rate. Our future is quite scary when you look at it properly. I believe that Boris etc have made the right decision and should continue to fill those planes with illegals and any others trying to enter the U.K.
I'll be honest mate, chartering a £500,000 flight and sending £120 million to Rwanda for the 6 people that are currently flying doesn't seem that beneficial for the UK public. Instead of that money being used to help "People here" it's being wasted sending people away. I very much doubt those 6 people would have been more of a cost to house than the millions spend sending them to Rwanda. It's literally been done to fool people into not questioning the numbers behind it.
You may not be racist but the government has total diff policy for white Ukranians
@@lemcakes32422 Are you an Arab?
@@lemcakes32422 Ukrainians didn't enter illegally
@@babagandu how can they when the boris has made it policy to ship ukranians to britain
Best news I’ve heard this year.
you must be choked to hear they are bringing vulnerable refugees back from Rwanda in return
You must have a sad little life :(
@@levbronstein-red maybe so. But the refugees that land in Rwanda will receive a better life than the one they already have. That’s the point.
@@Rozzajames Sounds like a flaccid excuse to me...
@@Rozzajames no they won't lol, its literally run by a dictator and they have 0.5% of our GDP, which is again most likely to be far less than the country they've escaped.
A government should always look after it's own people first instead of other outsiders
Exactly if other governments looked after their peoples as the U.K. looks after Brits, there would be almost no immigration anywhere.
BUT they do not... They can not even get that part right.
@@rw2578 oh, really? Why? What’s up with you, RW?
@@northernhardcore.7899 No idea ... asked many people what is up with me and so many answers I am spoilt for choice...
Why what ?
Or do you have a question at all ?
We can play the word games BUT it might not work out for you... It might BUT then again it might not....
Your choice.
What do you think is up with me ?
Now do not assume as that makes an ASS out of U not ME....
If you have no point then you made it very well... Congrats.
Now any person thinking they can do better ... Bring it on... I am open to sensible questions.... You can even insult me and at worst I will cry.
How did you do Northern hardcore... feeling better now or worse ?
Take your fingers to the keyboard and ask a question... I will answer the question.... Its so so simple . You can do it I have faith.
That's right, keep sending hundreds of millions of taxpayers pounds to Ukraine. Cherry-o. It's not like the UK has an inflation crisis worse than any European country, it's not like many UK citizens could become migrants soon if they can't afford to live as prices are rising faster. All's well and good.
People asking for the government to crack down harder on illegal immigrants are the same people complaining about this being unfair. Simple message for illegal immigrants if you chance it then expect the consequences. Fully agree with the tories on this.
ukranians deport them there no war in kyiv
Israel had this program, but found that the Rwandan government exploited the refugees. They were human trafficked into prostitution & slavery. Israel stopped it. Rwanda then turned to the UK to make up for the profit loss.
Put them all in prison that’s one way
Can I go instead! The accommodation in Rwanda looks fantastic! I'm done with this s**t hole
Finally they should of done this year's ago
So true.lets hope they start looking for illegals too...
Dumb dumb
What safety are you seeking from France?!
love to see that woman take all them refugees in and pay for them all then see what she say after that
👏
You can guarantee there’s none living near her.
She’s one of the ones that wants them all to come but not in her area.
Bet she has 1 friend of colour max.
Exactly 👍
@@tonysmall3863 NIMBY ( not in my back yard )
7 WHAT AN ABSOLUTE JOKE! THIS IS SUCH A PATHETICALLY LOW NUMBER....
What's so bad about Rwanda (or France for that matter) that these men are so picky they insist on only living in the UK?
The government of Rwanda wouldn't take much better care of them than for their own citizens, as is the case with the UK
💫benefits system💫
Maybe they speak English!
The majority of asylum seekers do settle in the first safe country they reach (usually Italy, Greece, Hungary or Croatia), but others have family elsewhere, or specific language skills, and continue on to places like the UK. That's necessary actually because the border countries couldn't possibly take all the people in need of shelter.
On top of that, and only God knows why, but around the world many people still see the UK as iconic for democracy, justice and freedom. That attracts people ready and willing to make a success of themselves. Someone should tell them we're just racist b******* who'd rather they drown at sea than make a contribution to our economy.
Still, it's up to the person making their life in a new country. Under international law, you can choose where you settle, it doesn't have to be the first safe country, and in fact it can't be because, as mentioned before, everyone would end up in the same few countries and they couldn't possibly process everyone.
Heck, if Russia decided to drop a nuclear bomb on the UK, I'd flee wherever I could, but if it turned out I couldn't return for a long time, I'd think seriously about which country I really want to settle in long-term. Anyone would.
benefits exsacly
Try entering New Zealand illegally .. just turn up on a beach and see what happends !!! NO support ,NO free food free accommodation, free heating, free electricity, free healthcare, free dentist, free spending money, free TV licence
scrap the tv licence
All those white colonialists turned up illegally and they are living there!
only if you are ukranian though
@@lemcakes32422 we dont have teleportation in Ukraine. if somebody decided to go there (which is pretty far) they probably had a reason (probably some relatives or friends) and booked a flight.
@@ukraine_will_win_ Ukrainian army committed genocide against people of Donbass for 8 years
My sister is in Finland and saw a ship of REAL refugees from Ukraine which are all children/women/elderly. Look at these all these males, who just abandon their country instead of trying to change it. We should send these people back so that we can help as many Ukrainian refugees as we can.
I didn't realise we were devaluing male lives now
It's so so easy to compare isn't it? How about more context - who would you fight in Syria? Join the terrorists to fight assad, join assad's terrible regime to fight the terrorirst? These places have been in constant conflict for decades, there's no clear enemy as it is in Ukraine, is there?
The travel is also hugely more costly and dangerous, of course you'd send the person more likely to survive and then bring the rest of the family wouldn't you?
Ukrainians are safe once they cross the border, you got Polish, Romanian, Moldavian people waiting for them to help them through or give them shelter in their own homes.
Do people from Africa or Middle East get the same?
@@JordyBoothy men should be for their country not fleeing like pussies
We were happy to take males for slaves, now you are sexist!
@@JordyBoothy imagine losing your right to a house because some 20 year old lad from the Middle East came over for free and got paid to live there
UK 🇬🇧 needs to take care of its own. They all just want benefits.
100% correct, I remember the French government many years ago stated that the reason they want to come here is for the generous benefits on offer & that the UK needs to significantly reduce the handouts.
Yes like the British always did occupying other countries and taking care of only the British.. and now they can’t support 7 people after looting Africa Asia for 300 years ..
Hi , I’m seo joon.I would love to know more about you.Are you on google chat
We should hold a referendum, and anyone who thinks this is wrong should have their tax tripled to pay for them.
And only English nationals should be allowed to vote in it for referenda fairness.
Are you dumb, the more migrants there are in the UK the more they fill up low-skill jobs that most Brits are unwilling to do which helps the economy. Migrants are essential to a functioning economy
its good deal as Rwandas can come to UK
@@ÆthelwulfOfNordHymbraLand2333 Ah, another 'ignoramus'. There are four countries in the UK. England is only one of them.
Educate yourself!
Well done UK !!🙌🙌🥳🥳
There were supposed to be 31 people on the flight. That number has been reduced to 7. This is nothing to celebrate.
@Dannii Try On Haul 📺 Many don't have passports or the country of origin refuses to take them.
@Dannii Try On Haul 📺 France doesn't have to take them back, unfortunately. They only had to under EU regulation and with the UK no longer being in the EU...
@Dannii Try On Haul 📺 It's a pretty shitty deal that way. And the flight was grounded by the ECHR, so we'll have to wait and see what's gonna come of this.
@Dannii Try On Haul 📺 I literally never said otherwise. Don't forget to take your medicine, kid.
If someone krept into your home uninvited would you let them stay .
Price Charles, Bishops and all the people outside court should be taken to Dover to meet our guests. They could then take them to their homes, feed them, clothe them, educate them and treat their sicknesses. The guests could earn their keep by baby sitting their daughters. Don't complain do something to help the same as we do for Ukrainians
Great idea 💡
prince charles has plenty of room a his place to put up a few , not sure i would trust any one that floated over , to be near my kids lol
I'm guessing that Prince Charles isn't on the housing waiting list
They should be using a fleet of Airbus A380's and flying around the clock until all the hotels and temporary accommodation are emptied.,
Why do you hate the UK?
@@20quid I think it’s the opposite..
@@20quid They don't, why do people want to continue to put the UK under massive financial strain for no reason.
@@user-bo3mp8un6c half a million per flight only 8 onboard
Agreed spot on.
Only 7 people? That is not efficient at all, a whole flight for 7 people, what an ecological disaster. The plane must be full, I am sure there are many more illegal immigrants that must be processed. The arch bishop of Canterbury, should shut up, the people are being processed, the 1951 convention is being abided by. The high court has given the OK for these people to have their asylum claims dealt with in Rwanda.
It'll be full for the return journey, never fear.
@Dannii Try On Haul 📺 They are sent to Rwanda for the processing of their claims. And yes some are from that continent.
@Dannii Try On Haul 📺 Your news source? I think you have bad info, not full of returning migrants. someone is feeding you BS.
Goodbye and don't come back
SEEKING SAFETY - FROM FRANCE ????????
WTF ? 😤
All these public figures objecting to the scheme never come up with an alternative. We are a very small island which is already super saturated with immigrants.
Maybe if you watched the video you would have seen that one of them proposed the government setting up safe routes as opposed to using a load of tax payer money fly people around the world
UK population is still small. alot of countryside since the population was exported out centuries ago
Super saturated with migrants . . . Please lose me on that cop out. Per the UNHCR: "The vast majority of refugees - 4 out of 5 - stay in their region of displacement, and consequently are hosted by developing countries. Turkey now hosts the highest number of refugees with 3.7 million, followed by Colombia with 1.7 million." A quarter of Lebanon's population is refugees and the UK (and other developed countries, ehem, the US) can't bother to pitch in the bare minimum w/o concocting a cockamamie scheme like this.
totaly saturated only have to go into town and hardlly any one speaking english
The U.K. has one of the largest populations in Europe, despite far from being the largest in size.
Any activists turn up put them on the plane to.
1 Philip Harris Fuk what you saying it here 😠 th-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/w-d-xo.html
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
put your mom on it too
I thought your kind are all for freedom of expression.
“The policy is dividing public opinion”?Not really. Nearly everyone agrees with it (however late this solution is) apart from the odd dingbat, leftie or liberal media type.
Untrue. It's against international law. Many people are objecting strongly to this plan, but evidently none of your friends
Flying 7 people out on a 270 person jet all the way to Africa?? Might as well buy them a house here, itll cost the taxpayer less money. That’s without mentioning the £100’s of millions that’ll be spent in Rwanda itself. Half of them will be flown back again once they complete the paperwork anyway, that’s the point in “offshore processing”. What a joke
@@dawnmoriarty9347 - looking at the comments on YT is a good start.
YESSSSS!!! May it continue.
Interesting, maybe they forget passports and refused boarding , 100s of empty seats ? What about carbon footprint , any that come today should go straight to the airport to fill the empties , that is the speed required
The church criticize again, but as usual do nothing to help out!!
Quite Kev, we now have the likes of the Bishop of Southwark and his cronies sticking their beaks in, spouting their usual tripe. Maybe they will adopt a few dinghy divers, even open up the church for them to abide in !
Why not fly them out on RAF Hercules?
not the RAF's job they kill people not deport them
2k pcs per flight. Every day delivery. In 20 years of hard work delivery, England would start to look like Britons rule the isle.
charted a whole plane for 7 or less illegal aliens. Some more government wasteful spending
Doesn’t the UNHCR already resettle migrants in Rwanda themselves.
7 people bit we have over 40 thousand migraints currently residing in hotels what a waste of hardworkers tax payers money
if they come from France, where the risk in France ? More risk crossing the Channel..
Many don’t speak French or have family in the uk already
Not if France make them feel as unsafe as possible....
@@Andrew-ob5ij cool, they can learn it just like they learned english, language is not a right of passage, i speak english does that mean i can demand australia let me in and live there for free?
@@v_cpt-phasma_v689 and under uk law these people can claim asylum in the Uk. So unless you yourself are a refugee, Australia has no obligation
I'm sure the cultural enrichment will put Rwanda on the map, and the influx of immigrants is sure to make it a powerhouse.
After all, immigration is good! These asylum seekers should be ecstatic that they can get out of the French warzone and into a safe secure country like Rwanda.
😂 😂 😂 Brilliant, 😂
Nice one.🤣🤣🤣
There is over 100 000 of them in hotels up and down the uk never going to change will the public keep voting for the same 650
The plane should of been full!
even more ukranians arriving
Put them all on a huge cargo ship ,the cheapest way
why cant they stay in france its a safe country isnt it ?
The UK is a safe country, why can't they stay here?
I will like you to come France see for yourself the reason why people run away thanks
@@professorpancakes6545 cause they cross from from france in dingys and drown it isnt that safe
@@welsh-3286 That is why we should provide a safe way for them to get here.
They are not coming for sanctuary.
Such a simple task takes so long! No wonder UK is tanking! The plane should be full load! Why waste the flight!
It's a 'token gesture' !
Some asylum seekers are afraid of the Rwandan police to beat them.
We were never asked! Demand a referendum on immigration and asylum seekers now! Let the British people have their rights to democracy.
Did she say 7 people on board?? Wtf. There should be a FULL aeroplane and another each day, until the thousands are deported.
The home office is spending how much to deport 7 people by chartering a private airliner?
Push them back into the sea and say good luck. It's time to man up.
Well done Pritti and Boris and that’s why the hard-working normal people of this country love you!! And by the way if the Scottish want them send them up there..
Are you aware that the government has signed a recipricol agreement witrh Rwanda ? The Uk has agreed to take people from Rwanda with complex mental and physical healtrh issues. If you dont believe me may I suggest that you do your own independent research.
@@pandorapiam3374 or you could quote your sources.
@@Whoami691 There are several articles online. Even the Mail on line reported it in April. I am not in the habit of just making things up and thgen posting it online!
@LiveYourLifeBeFree People will just believe what they want to if it fits their own narritive. The UK has also agreed a huge aid package to Rwanda. I have got nothing against foriegn aid myself but to try and say that this whole thing is about trying to save the UK money is utter rubbish. I think it was obvious that Rwanda would not have agreed to all of this unless there was something in it for them.
They came from France but are apparently 'vulnerable'. 🤨🤔😵😡
We all can't wait!👌👍
@Marie Lucas shut up
Can't wait for Rwandan refugees to settle in the UK?
Is that what you can't wait for?
Are you really Mother Teresa?
@@riffraff9506 well Rwandans will be coming to work under the deal to UK
@@lemcakes32422 We could give the boat refugees work, why fly them to Africa & fly different ones back for work?
@Marie Lucas I said you're dumb.
Not asylum seekers.
It is so satisfying to here all legal challenges rejected. About time this government did something positive in stopping my country being over run by these scroungers.
Geneva Convention on refugees signed by Britain!
@@dianamincher6479 The trouble is it is being abused.
They should be STOPPED on UK borders! That is it! No explanations more needed, because enough is enough long time!
Use the navy to turn them back, sink any boat that refuses.
At least somethings being done to get these people from the war torn Northern French coast to safety......better weather than the UK in Rwanda anyway. If I could chose between staying in the Travelodge in the outskirts of Dover or a trip to Africa I know what I'd do.
Then please go. Please. British culture doesnt suit you.
Did you see how Liverpool football fans were treated on camera by the French police? Asylum seekers are treated FAR worse.
Well they shouldn't be left just to wander around unchecked in public. It only takes one to get through and cause havoc and that's one too many. Can't take those chances anymore. It's for the government to solve, but they won't, it'll just create trouble as usual and we have to pay for it.
@@FPSPRINCESS You don't pay for it at all. Benefits scrounger.
@@levbronstein-red proof?
if they have some spare seats chuck a few protesters on to keep them company
Best news I heard in ages.
It costs 500,000 pounds to send them on a single flight! Cheaper to set up a coastguard with machine guns surely?!
You didn’t go to college
@@youcantmakeclaimsofexisten3898 yes look at me I support refugee’s ain’t I great everyone love me. Goat.
@@bluegtturbo Good job you didn't have to go fight Hitler.
@@barrythomson6329 your parents did a great job of raising you👌🏿
If only the French had the spine to do this
They're too busy guiding the illegal immigrants into British waters.
I would love to fly to Rwanda and free, these asylum seekers are lucky, they have nothing to complain about, salute from spain to my fellow british people
The Left are now opposed to immigration..........well, to Rwanda.
They're now concerned about cost and what's unlawful..........when they never gave a damn about it before!
Earth belongs to everyone you can’t decide some people live in Green areas and some in bad areas .
its a one way ticket to a dictatorial regime that has literally opened fire on refugees when this was tested before, they have 0.5% of our GDP. i think there's something to complain about...
Hi , I’m seo joon.I would love to know more about you.Are you on google chat
Good. Thousands more please.
..try 'millions' ...
"37 asylum seekers arrived yesterday from france, a safe country"
They are not asylum seekers by your own words Beeb.
Edit: Stop calling them Asylum seekers, they are not that no matter how many times you repeat the lie.
How do you know it?
Which words said that?
@@kostasl5922 ELI5:
Someone seeking asylum is supposed to stop in the first safe country and apply for asylum.
Someone who comes over illegaly in a dingy and dumps thier ID/Passport in the channel is not 'seeking asylum', they are economic migrants, they are not 'fleeing war torn syria' as they could have stopped at france, or any of the many other safe countries they passed through.
So yeah, an asylum seeker is generaly seeking asylum, not 'better prospects'.
@@Wolf-zp5iw I don't agree, these people are in need that's why are coming in UK
@@kostasl5922 its not somthing you can disagree with im afraid, these people are not seeking saftey (asylum).
Let the Church of England pay for the economic migrants then.
That is the point, they have come from France which is a safe country.
1 T Iger Fuk what you saying it here 😠 th-cam.com/video/8zrfSK6pnpQ/w-d-xo.html
Felicidades, es un buen ejemplo. 😠
5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😠😠
Saludos desde la Cd.. de world 🌹😉💖
los mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
We could use a few thousand flights just like that in America.
It's kind of contradictory for France to call itself a safe country when they sit and watch as these people are transported on a dangerous journey across the Channel.
Sounds more like "Safe to pass through, just don't stop here."
Would the UK stop migrants trying to get to a third country?
@@saveandinvestwithgiorgiolo8375 it’s not our fault that people don’t wanna leave. Maybe if other countries didn’t treat them like shit they all wouldn’t wanna come to UK and we could spread them around abit but then again no other countries are gonna opt for that cause why would they when they can just watch them all come to the UK
@@B33FY97 France Germany and Italy are taking in for more of these migrants and when the UK was part of the Dublin Convention France along with other EU/EEA countries had a legal obligation not to allow them to go to another EU country and ask for asylum in the first country of arrival. As the UK is now a third country this is no longer the case.
@@saveandinvestwithgiorgiolo8375 France and Germany are MUCH bigger with much lower population density. If you want all countries to take same amount it shows your low iq
UK and France have a deal the public has no idea about. both created wars in countries these refugees are from
Disgusting and dehumanising. How low can this appalling government get?
All them outside the court should be put on that flight with them
And the weird little trolls. Those freaks are definitely worth deporting ;)
@@mr.skeleton3190 Probably longer than a whining little middle class incel...
Hahahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sink the boats before they get to Britain
Hands up all those who don’t want to go to Rwanda. Now show us your passport to start the immigration process . What do you mean you destroyed it on purpose so that you could claim benefits. Next applicant please.
A genuine question.
Why are they fleeing France.
Because English is a universal language that some of them speak and as a Nation we are seen as fair, just and civilised. These people have been fed a dream that is far from the truth. But they will find out that this country is racist,unjust and far from civilised. They are not fleeing France they have been trafficked to the UK by gangs . When Russia drops a big bomb on London and people want to go to Eire to be safe the only way is by a rubber boat ,then you might understand.
Social care police first responders nhs and many more are stretched to the limit not enough money to look after the country's own people never mind the whole world we simply cannot look after everyone there's not enough housing either
And idiots on here like David Davidson think we should take them all ,,,,, till His daughters are raped or he is robbed
The BBC needs to interview people advocating both sides, not just asking one. This would allow people to see a wider perspective.
Oh they know they just don't want that
Great! Enforcing our borders and not letting ourselves be taken advantage of.
This literally breaks internation law. That we signed up to
You do know that the deal is that there will be refugees to Rwanda on the return flight. The ones they don't want.
@@elkpaz560 no guarantee that they will get a flight back
@@simonhool3073 Really? Study the 'deal'... we're taking Rwanda's elderly and infirm in exchange.
Everytime we get a successful deportation an angel gets its wings..🏴🙏
We Uk taxpayers are already paying way too much tax to the government. Is it right to ask British to pay more and more tax to help these people without a valid reason to settle in the uk and add that burden also to tax payers? Everything from legal fees that spent to deal with illegal immigrants is a cost to the taxpayers. It’s a blessing to immigration lawyers as they can claim legal aid.
Well your government should have thought about that before they colonised the whole world. Send them back with the gold and diamonds your country took from them. And do not forget about all the ports in Africa you annexed. You annexed all the minerals in their country.
They have to do something we are being invaded
No we aren't, idiot. Not by even any stretch of the imagination.
This is such a great policy for people of colour, and a huge win for BLM! It's great to see the government partnering up with an African country like this and investing money into the Rwanda economy. The government has always said it was anti-racism, but moves like this really show their commitment to anti-racism.
Nice try.
....do you have a clue what you're talking about??
Very true. They keep saying the UK is racist, now they can all F off back to there 100% where's there's no "racism" .
I dont think UK state budget cant afford to send them all back. In last 70 years hordes came, cities like Londonistan and Birghingamstan are waiting for clean sweep.
@@tellyclemmons4 Sure he has, but need to use new-speak to prevent censorship.
If the British people say it is lawful, then it is lawful.
Send the bill for this to France.
why did we give France 54 million quid ? I am sure it wasn't for looking the other way. Would be worth the risk to use the border patrol water taxi to turn them around and take them straight back to France
How so?
@@enjek5654 Well they have been paid to stop this yet didn't they used a frigate to escort them over, so yes they need to return the money we paid.
@@historickeeper You might want to look at the agreement - it doesn't say what you claim. Leaving the EU removed their incentive as the Dublin agreement no longer applies.
@@enjek5654 You clearly have not read the news about the border agreement that was signed after brexit 🙄
Excellent news it should be a cargo ship 🚢
I wonder how much it cost to hire a plane to fly just 7 people? Seems like a waste to me.
Only 7????
"It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out."
Carl Sagan.
he can make world peace make us economy up . and u? cheated by fake news?
This government is good for one thing. lining its own pocket at the expense of the over taxed taxpayers
We must learn the social class system in Britain and not imagine that we're in any way equal. We see how Boris Johnson can ignore his own laws.
Open minded doesn't mean gullible. Science demands openess at all times. Closed mindedness is a restricted world view.
Well done Brits money well spent 😂
Read the details of the policy. If the English sheep knew the numbers and points he would be appalled
How does it break up the trafficking business plan in any way? They’re still gonna try and their still going to make money. Awful justification
Protecting our border isn't anything to do with racism - when are the woke lefties, going to understand this. We don't have room or the infrastructure for thousands of daily illegal asylum seekers. What about the health and living standards of British citizens, don't WE matter? Even if there is only one illegal on that flight tonight, I will applaud and hope it acts as a deterrent.
We must Leave the ECHR NOW.
This airline manages to fly 7 people but other airlines are cancelling flights every day!!!!!
And stay out
Good news, but only 7 people?!?
France is a safe country.full stop
If safety is what they need then France, where they came from is as safe as they need it to be. People work and pay taxes so that a nations benefits from it and not someone who came on a rubber boat and starts claiming benefits.
Will you let a thief stay in your loft and eat all you have in the kitchen daily? If people feel that it is ok for these people to live here then I feel that anyone can live in anyone's house and eat all they can and take what they can.
Wow now we dont have only Nazi-Russia, but also Nazi-UK.
Your post just shows that you don’t understand anything. Why should France take all the burden?
They shouldn’t - if they had any sense they would do something similar to the U.K.
@@enjek5654 why should we in the UK take all the burden ya mean
@@yochananpeacock6101 No, I don’t mean that because we take very little of the burden. Look up the figures instead of showing your ignorance.
We need a cheaper method
It's so wrong. that tax payers has to pay for all of them nobody signed up for that
I know right they take like 0.00001 of your taxes for giving people who aren't born in privilege like you some hope. Nah just send them back that'll solve everything...
@@luismoura3687 if you believe that your a fool
Join patriotic alternative and have a voice in stopping the great replacement of the British people
7 People!!!!! should be 70,000.
Stop the Channel Invasion.
Reduce Immigration.
70k every week, for 20 yrs
The vastly overpopulated UK can take no more of this insanity, our once wonderful country is systematically being destroyed financially, culturally and ethnically. Absolutely deplorable.
Ronald you are an ignorant. Britain colonised countries, loot, raped and killed. Britain was built on free slave labour. Any person from any country colonised by Britain deserve to be in Britain.
Well ethnically your ancestors already changed plenty of times and culture changes every generation. For example, you're not the same people who built Stonehenge although you are descendants of them. You don't speak their language, or have their religious beliefs. That culture is lost to time. Likewise, your descendants won't be exactly like you. They may even be part South Asian or African. There's really no way to ensure that it won't happen. You can influence your kids but that may not even work.
Thank you to Boris thank you to Theresa May and thank you to Priti Patel well done 👍,,,
Are you stupid?
Theresa the Appeaser is AGAINST this...
Umm umm umm Australia has nothing to do with this, Australia stopped refugee boats arriving because children were drowning on the high seas in large numbers, she didn't mention that.