Laser level vs Water level | Which is more accurate?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 มิ.ย. 2024
  • While the crew from WD Metal Buildings were putting up the metal frame for Barndominium 203, they used their water level to mark all the pipes to establish a level benchmark. I decided to set up my laser level and pin both levels against each other. The results were shocking!
    Order Texas Barndominiums MERCH here!
    texasbarndominiums.com/merch/
    More info on our Website.
    texasbarndominiums.com/
    Follow us on Facebook and Instagram.
    / texasbarndominiums
    / texasbarndominiums
    We get all of our music from Artlist.io
    Click link below to sign up and get two additional months for free.
    artlist.io/Erik-167444
    #TexasBarndominiums
    #Barndominium
    #Waterlevel
    Gear I use to shoot videos (updated 8.1.19):
    Main Camera - amzn.to/2CW7hs1
    Gimbal for main camera - amzn.to/2tERtrp
    Favorite lens - amzn.to/2FeSvyu
    B-Roll lens - amzn.to/2hui1Wz
    Drone - amzn.to/2jsAozi
    GoPro 7 - amzn.to/2T3n2KB
    Gimbal for GoPro - amzn.to/2AKFtag
    Microphone - amzn.to/2hxv6BW
    Tripod - amzn.to/2iW2ZsF
    Tripod video head - amzn.to/2yEZGgl
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 478

  • @280zone
    @280zone 4 ปีที่แล้ว +246

    Laser levels require line of sight, water levels can work around corners, through trees, opposite sides of a vehicle. etc.

    • @markg.2501
      @markg.2501 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Excellent Point👌👍🆗

    • @srooster4410
      @srooster4410 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      very good point.

    • @hocuspocus4871
      @hocuspocus4871 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is what I was going to say.

    • @OmarGarcia-bi7jq
      @OmarGarcia-bi7jq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are a genius, 👌🏽

    • @dbmail545
      @dbmail545 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Modern technology that can produce a translucent flexible tube that long. The LASER is off(not perfectly leveled) the water is as correct as you can get.

  • @bdkj3e
    @bdkj3e 4 ปีที่แล้ว +138

    I would put it down to human error must likely.

    • @markg.2501
      @markg.2501 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed....(see my comment above)

    • @bonniewachter6688
      @bonniewachter6688 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I wish he’d have run the water level again to confirm his suspicion. Great video though. Fun challenge.

  • @stevenfoust6598
    @stevenfoust6598 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    Seems like someone was just in a hurry with their water level marks, I've used water in a pinch several times it's always dead on

  • @leonsullivan3490
    @leonsullivan3490 4 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    I’d trust water level, yes it’s takes a bit longer but it can go around corners/blind spots and still be read accurately

    • @johnjacobjinglehimerschmid3555
      @johnjacobjinglehimerschmid3555 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm reading alot of comments about the time needed for a water level.
      Starting to think if I wanted cheap and quick. I'd buy two long lengths of tubing. Affix two of them together. Then move one end to a spot where you need marking. Then move the other tube to another spot. Hopefully, by the time you've affixed site 2 ... site 1 has settled down for marking, then move it to the next point. Return to the other tube and mark and move.
      Cheap and possibly just as fast.

    • @Ga7cun7sSUCK
      @Ga7cun7sSUCK 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ive seen plenty of brick piers that are up to and over 30mm out of level after brick layers using water levels to level them. Ill stick to my laser level thanks.

    • @crpth1
      @crpth1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ga7cun7sSUCK - Just as in the video. The error is not from the water level per se. It's operator induced!
      That's a given. Physics don't change. On the other hand operator's patience, capacity, whatever, varies a lot! ;-)
      With this said I would go with a laser.
      - IF I didn't have to pay for it! ;-)
      - IF there was a multitude of continuous work, that justified it! Other wise for a couple of measures the water level would be just fine. After all most backyard projects only need a few measurements. A "pro" doing it all day long, day in day out. That's another story!

  • @raybechtel8343
    @raybechtel8343 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I use a water level on my projects. Just built a 50'x104' pole barn. Never had a problem worked great! Just make sure you get all the air bubbles out!

  • @Husky.Dude.
    @Husky.Dude. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    water level is accurate to the dot. laser levels have a +-1/8” when you go further than 30+feet. so i’ll put my $ on the water level.

    • @ernestosanchez840
      @ernestosanchez840 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's. That

    • @extendedclipz2689
      @extendedclipz2689 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also the calibration and clean lens affects alot

    • @gatewaysolo104
      @gatewaysolo104 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Water level has the concave due to the surface tension so you might have 1/8 in or so with the water level as well

    • @tumbleweed265
      @tumbleweed265 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's the craziness thing I've ever heard..lol. After 30' you loose or gain 1/8"!? Sticks of pipe are 20' and we lay 300' and never move the laser. Check every joint and it's always on grade. You're crazy..

    • @dylanrampage9360
      @dylanrampage9360 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      My money is on the water level. Lasers are good hell their great but there's human error, lasers are fast you get in groove going around marking your elevation an its very easy to get off an 1/8th inch by not marking the exact spot that the target card is telling you to.

  • @BlackLabAdventures
    @BlackLabAdventures 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    If you add petcocks to both ends of the water level, and shut them "off" before moving the water level, you will have much less bounce to the water, as you wait for it to settle in the tube.
    I have been building boats for 36 years. A water level is what we always use to level our multi-million dollar boats.
    Another choice to use for liquid to use in a water level is, non-toxic antifreeze.

    • @crpth1
      @crpth1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Petcock or cork is perfect for storage and transportation of the water level! But for it to level quickly, covering and releasing the tube with your finger in a quick succession will stop it in no time! With some practice it's surprisingly fast! ;-)

  • @missmymountain
    @missmymountain 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Measure it with a micrometer, mark it with a crayon, cut it with an axe.
    Accuracy and repeatability with any construction method is in the hands of the craftsman.

    • @jl9678
      @jl9678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The importance of that statement is cannot be overstated

    • @Passco666
      @Passco666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Really good point! Manworker tolerance is the main accuracy.

    • @SH19922x
      @SH19922x 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have never seen this guy strike a mark that wasnt at least a few mm' off the mark from using those 10 inch thick marking pens.
      I guarantee everything is off by a bit

    • @dziggy3004
      @dziggy3004 หลายเดือนก่อน

      :D

  • @ricktrapperriley2534
    @ricktrapperriley2534 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    You can check the accuracy of the lazar level using the two peg method, most people don’t know how to do this. I’ve found brand new lazar levels to be inaccurate. A water level doesn’t need to be checked and is always right on if you are patient enough to wait for the water to settle out. To two peg a level set up two posts 50 feet apart. Set the level up in the centre. Shoot both posts and measure the difference. Move the level 50 feet away from the pegs and shoot them again and measure the difference it should be the same. If it’s not you can see if it’s shooting up or down.

    • @Ga7cun7sSUCK
      @Ga7cun7sSUCK 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Every other tradesman also went to trade school rick! Were you the auther of the the two peg method??

    • @zaz4667
      @zaz4667 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SWEET!

    • @tbiz8236
      @tbiz8236 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Ga7cun7sSUCK 2 peg test is more of a surveying test to check if there dumpy level is callibrated and can be used the callibrate it

  • @tonyg9511
    @tonyg9511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    There are a couple of ways to use a water level by yourself. The first is when you have the two ends together fix the stationary end to a post etc then mark the waterlevel on the tube, when you are at the marking end you have to make sure the water is at the line you marked and it will be at the line on the fixed end. The quickest method is to drill a hole in the bottom of a bucket and silicon one end of the hose into the bucket, fill with water, mark the hose with a line and when marking make sure water is at the mark. The bucket reservoir will dampen the water movement in the hose and make it settle much quicker.

  • @teddwayne
    @teddwayne 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interesting video I stumbled on here. I am a metal stud drywall guy,and I actually started in the trades in Texas,and we used a water level all the time,back in 1983 the lasers were not yet as available as today. I think since there was only 1 discrepancy, it could be the mark made on the pipe was slightly off...But yes,the water level is the bomb,just keep the air bubbles out.

  • @vernyanke1131
    @vernyanke1131 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I have used both pretty extensively the laser you need to check calibration every so often. The water level wind will make a difference sometimes the upwind side will have a higher pressure then the downwind side causing your levels to be off a little bit. The laser level can be a one-man operation easier than a water level but if one end of your water level is attached to a bucket filled with water it can be a one man operation also. A very good laser level can have a range from one side to the other of almost a thousand feet a water level is limited to probably about 150 to 300 feet. A water level has its advantages in that you can level easily underneath structures and in any room. It is probably wise put a small amount of detergent in the water used in a water level to do away with the surface tension of the water. Don't use too small of a hose because the surface tension will make a difference. I always used a garden hose with a clear section of hose at the end to get my levels I always put a valve on it also so that when I transported the end from one location to the other I didn't lose any water.
    High tension power lines, strobe lights like those found on emergency vehicles, arc welders and anything that reflects light like large glass windows that business sometimes have will play Havoc with your laser level receiver. Get too close to an automobile that has a real shiny finish can be a problem too. If you have more than one laser level on a job site or nearby you can get some very erroneous readings also. You don't have those problems with a water level. However you can have problems with heavy equipment running over your hoses. If you do not need a level very often a water level is probably far more cost-effective. So in summary they both have their advantages and disadvantages. You can get very good results out of both of them. A water level is a very good tool for surveying caves and mines. Another pretty good low tec level is a speed square and plumb bob but it is not nearly as accurate as a water level. The best level that I have ever used was a split bubble Wild made in Switzerland it was so sensitive that just switching your weight from one foot to the other even on solid concrete would cause the bubble to move slightly.

  • @themancerafamilia7165
    @themancerafamilia7165 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My father and I did this method for his house and it was pretty kool what my father taught me! Glad people like you are showing these kind of videos!

  • @dustinhenderson8324
    @dustinhenderson8324 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wish I had an opportunity to work with an old school like this cat even with my years exp. I know I learn a lot. No one in Missouri wants to pass knowledge on just make their money.

  • @carlosbarrera8847
    @carlosbarrera8847 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That project is going to be beautiful. Great pick on your contractors.. Thank you for sharing. Texas Barndominiums!!

  • @corydriver7634
    @corydriver7634 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I think the water level is spot on every time. You mentioned the con for water levels; they’re slow because you have to wait for the water to settle. Someone else also mentioned lasers are line of sight- the only limit on a water level is how much hose you have available. Something else to consider...does the laser level need to be calibrated occasionally?

  • @joehosie
    @joehosie 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow Erik! Great video yet again!

  • @davidz1681
    @davidz1681 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Badass video. Thanks...very informational!

  • @81recinos
    @81recinos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Now the question is how much do you appreciate the old school trades those who had no technology and everything was made by hand and pure brain

  • @CookieMonster_1969
    @CookieMonster_1969 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Like most scenarios I have seen at job sites, the true test is repeatability, which level works more often? My guess is, in a more exhaustive test, both levels are going to perform very well, and it is most likely, human error that accounts for differences. An example, if you measure something 10 times and 9 measurements are the same, and one is not, the measure that is not the same, it is usually due to human error, and not the tool.

    • @webtheweb
      @webtheweb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Water level, nothing needed? Only a pipe and water, last time i checked thats something.

  • @500label
    @500label 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a exciting vlog man thanks for shairng CHEERS with levels.

  • @BuntMeister66
    @BuntMeister66 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, as a builder I have used both, and I've seen lasers be off, especially if not setup correctly or dropped etc. Yet I still use the laser for the most part for speed etc, and it's easy to setup a couple benchmarks and to check yourself... I used to keep a backup water level... Might get a hundred feet of tubing again, just in case...
    I like the windshield washer fluid idea... Here in So Kal it's not cold enough to need for freezing, but visiblity is better...

  • @CurmudgeonExtraordinaire
    @CurmudgeonExtraordinaire 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Let it settle and the water level will be as accurate as the meniscus of the water in the tube. Add a bit of dishwashing soap and the meniscus will decrease, giving even more accurate measurements. The laser will expand slightly over distances, so when you are marking your levels, you need to ensure that you are marking the exact center of every laser dot / line. If you are needing to mark a single reference point throughout a house where there will be walls blocking a clear line of sight, the water level will work better. If you wanted to see if the slab of your house is at the same level throughout your house, the water level would be a better choice.

  • @kylegreene1583
    @kylegreene1583 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In the summer months in FL the laser would droop on which ever side the sun WASN'T shining on. Thermal expansion was the cause.

  • @ramongarcia8044
    @ramongarcia8044 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Maestro

  • @joeparker7508
    @joeparker7508 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    The mark itself may move. "The guy marking " could have breath and move a 8th

    • @TexasBarndominiums
      @TexasBarndominiums  4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I think this is what happened.

    • @joeparker7508
      @joeparker7508 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      On your Barndo's do you foam under roof and on top sealing are batten

  • @johnfrederikson2002
    @johnfrederikson2002 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice job; thanks. J.

  • @colinblankenship2401
    @colinblankenship2401 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for sharing.

  • @dannygonzales2528
    @dannygonzales2528 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    My dad use that option when adding to our house 35yrs ago, he used red kool-aid . And learned that from his dad...

    • @dbmail545
      @dbmail545 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That would have been almost the earliest translucent tubing on the market.

    • @aredditor4272
      @aredditor4272 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is such a thing as red food coloring....

    • @doubledarefan
      @doubledarefan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kool Aid Man has entered the chat.

    • @juans6639
      @juans6639 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      And your dad probably paid a nickel, .05 cents for the small pack of koolaid. That's what it cost back in the 1950's and early 1960's...Good idea, thanks.

    • @borys444
      @borys444 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He used kool aid cause it would make for a good summer beverage after the job is done.

  • @rtsaibr
    @rtsaibr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks for the video

  • @johnmorgan1629
    @johnmorgan1629 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    "Water finds it's own level." For a minute it was going to turn into a flat earth video.

    • @TexasBarndominiums
      @TexasBarndominiums  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😂

    • @xephael3485
      @xephael3485 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's why he was off an 1/8"! It was the curve of the earth.

    • @billydbear4783
      @billydbear4783 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Earth is flat.. Research it I dare you! Water don't curve around a ball ..this is just common sense....but if you want to believe nasa with their cartoon images go ahead throw your common sense out the window..I'm not trolling.i just want more people to think about what they believe to be true.peace..

    • @crpth1
      @crpth1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      To the OP, nice joke! LOL 😂
      To the flat earther comment above, even BIGGER. LOL 😂

  • @ericwiningar8410
    @ericwiningar8410 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great information! First time I’ve seen a water level in use and I can’t deny the science! Subscribed to the channel!

  • @NicholasMaietta
    @NicholasMaietta 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just learned something awesome today.

  • @markdaniel8740
    @markdaniel8740 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The water level should be perfect, except when it gets hot and bubbles form.
    The laser beam can get larger at distance and they all have tolerance that increases errors with distance.

  • @renegadorico3966
    @renegadorico3966 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video amigo!
    Water of course!!

  • @interestinoldschool8080
    @interestinoldschool8080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Been using an inexpensive one for years, needs salt water for conductivity as it's electronic, gives of the same beeping sound as the laser receiver.. pretty spot on, claims +/- 1/8th" in a hundred feet. Great for starter courses around corners when working alone.

  • @dmadere1
    @dmadere1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve used one many times! Always accurate!

  • @DB-cx6cb
    @DB-cx6cb 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a 70 year old now retired from the trades I witnessed many Masonry and Tile craftsmen in hospitals installations use the water levels over Lazer’s.

  • @tonyvalerio3778
    @tonyvalerio3778 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They are both good but I like the laser level.great job Erik

  • @buildingenergywise5336
    @buildingenergywise5336 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Used water level 80s-90s. First lazer had double bubbles to level. Would need to keep checking to make sure the laser was still plumb. Finally got a self leveling laser which works great!

  • @markbennett1237
    @markbennett1237 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's pretty impressive that that it's only off by 1/8" at that one location. I think the error could have easily been additive. For the water mark, it may have been off by 1/16" in one direction, and the laser mark could have been off by 1/16" in the other direction (1/8" total).

  • @01aharley
    @01aharley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    not to mention the laser can get hit and a parking garage can be out of level by a couple inches, don’t ask how I know.

  • @yotarocket
    @yotarocket 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I made the 1,000 like :) Thanks for the quick and informative videos!

  • @skywatchman8326
    @skywatchman8326 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. water is very accurate. used that a lot.

  • @zaz4667
    @zaz4667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    SWEET! I was just wondering about this! Nice experiment! My guess would be the laser lever since in the back of the book of my laser level it says at 100 feet it is + or - 1/16th .

  • @bushmannevkoch9907
    @bushmannevkoch9907 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've used water levels a lot on building site especially on relocated house's projects when there 2 or 3 sections and working from 1 datum point Lazer's can't see through plaster sheeting or as America's call drywall.

  • @Tedthib
    @Tedthib 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been using water levels since I was a teenager in my family pool business. Works great for swimming pools.

  • @dwanmelba8289
    @dwanmelba8289 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love it. My laser level is easy to use early in the morning, not so much in the middle of the day. This water level is impressive and a heck of a lot cheaper.

  • @ArtisanTony
    @ArtisanTony 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The 1/8" would be easy to get just by marking mistakes. the pencil is 1/16" thick :) the laser relies on charged batteries and the ability to mark the notch accurately. My money is on the water level especially since you have the wiper fluid in it to reduce bubble and friction. I have worked with many lasers in 40 years and they can be fussy :) setup time is reduced with the water level also, nice video.

  • @richardlocke3375
    @richardlocke3375 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I put a valve on each end of hose so I can close the ends till the next time I need it. Fast and accurate and with valves no mess or need for water on site.

    • @marlboromatt5656
      @marlboromatt5656 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Does the tube ever develop air pockets . I’ve been draining mine but then I have to get the Air out of the line before each use. Would be nice to eliminate the step of getting all the air bubbles out

  • @cocospops9351
    @cocospops9351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Never heard of a water level. So clever

  • @TheDuran69
    @TheDuran69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Double check my friend

  • @marlboromatt5656
    @marlboromatt5656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. I like using my water level just so people can ask me “what the heck is that”. I love telling them my level cost $25.00 and then hear them say they spent $1500 .

  • @Sam-lk6eo
    @Sam-lk6eo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Most Lasers have a discrepancy of 2 to 3 mm either side of true level ? Therefore one needs to move the Receiver and observe a height mark on the work, when it's at it's highest point just before it starts to beep periodically, and then do a second mark after moving the Receiver down slightly until the continuous beep changes to a periodic beep at it;s lowest point. Once You find this range, then it is simply mark the centre point between both marks giving You True Level and a more accurate reading ! Hope this helps !

  • @davidyazvac9325
    @davidyazvac9325 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video and explanations. I like to set the laser up in the center of the project if possible.

  • @kmacradio
    @kmacradio 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video

  • @WinnebagoBrewingCo
    @WinnebagoBrewingCo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! This info will come in handy in the future. What camera are you using to make the video?

  • @IveysFamilyFactotum
    @IveysFamilyFactotum 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love using water levels and for the cost comparison its well worth the little wait of water balancing.

  • @gungadinn
    @gungadinn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've used the water level, laser and jig transit for layout before. For simplicity, the water level wins. For speed and accuracy, the laser wins, for absolute accuracy, the transit is king.
    The laser is a productivity tool. A single tradesman can set up a laser and mark all the locations inside a work space in minutes. A water level is a low skilled tool that works well within the limitations of the length of the tubing you have access to.

  • @uwesteinki1793
    @uwesteinki1793 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Water level every time. Built my 13 mt x9 mt garage, concert floor, all steel construction. Can't beat that water. Great video. Cheers from Australia.

  • @chevyford100
    @chevyford100 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello, excellent video, I would like to know, for example, when you use the receiver at 20m, how much error does this laser have in cm? do you have any idea? thank you

  • @Tinyhomedeals
    @Tinyhomedeals 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love how you share some of your tricks of the trade. Just a little sceptical ever since your cement slab for $1 sqft video. 😉🤠😂😜😙

  • @MichaelJanzen
    @MichaelJanzen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    water. cheap, easy. 100% accurate. Thanks for posting!

  • @duanethieme4186
    @duanethieme4186 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    When using water level check for bubbles, for they will affect the level. Before using water hose do a level test like you did, put the hoses side by side to check calibration. I filled the hose with RV pink antifreeze, worked great at first, the next year it was off an 1", I'm thinking the additives in the RV antifreeze separated.

  • @K2teknik.
    @K2teknik. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Air pressure can make tricks to the water level, that is difference in air pressure, like wind blow into one end of the pipe/hose and the other end is on the opposite side of where the wind hits the object you are measuring at (this create a small vacuum compare to the real air pressure). An other thing can be temperature of the water in the pipe/hose, if you start with cold water in the morning and the pipe/hose lay in the sun during the day it will heat up and expand, if you do not recheck with your reference point then this can trick you too.

  • @colinmacfarlan6366
    @colinmacfarlan6366 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use both and each has it's merits, biggest problem we have is wind which shuttles the water back and forth through the tube( no rude comments please!!). Trees obsticles buildings etc not a problem .Drop your bundle of tube - no damage cheap to buy and nil to fill.
    Laser quick and easy limited to dull days or use a recieve,r regular accuracy checks needed and limited to line of sight

  • @Bluenoser613
    @Bluenoser613 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Old tried and true methods are often the best. Technology doesn't always make things better.

  • @mitchyelvington4776
    @mitchyelvington4776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My dad told me! He built every hotel on Panama city beach , a water level! 30 years ago?! Back in the 50 s

    • @1puppetbike
      @1puppetbike 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The fifties were 30 years ago!?

    • @jimmyboredom3519
      @jimmyboredom3519 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@1puppetbike he leveled. Not do the maths of history

  • @kapiatgatas
    @kapiatgatas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm from the Philippines living in Texas. As an engineer and carpenter I love technology. Unfortunately only big contractors in the Philippines would have the privilege's of technology. Regular carpenters and masons still uses crooked hand tools and a water tubing for leveling. Like you said its been used for thousands of years. If it works don't change it.

  • @RLabbe508
    @RLabbe508 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have used a water level for years and the only issue I've had with using it is with other workers stepping on the hose! I've even had them trip on the hose spilling the water pail and causing me to fill and start over. You also need to be careful of air bubbles in the hose,

  • @lsellclumanetsolarenergyll5071
    @lsellclumanetsolarenergyll5071 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love water levels because when you are on very uneven terrain you can work very easily with it.
    Once you have a slab or level foundation or work inside the laser can speed things up but the upfront costs are my problem also getting the laser setup level is sometimes an issue when the ground is not solid.

    • @dylanrampage9360
      @dylanrampage9360 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are so many lasers on the market now that the price really isn't that bad compared to 20 years ago when they cost thousands of dollars. I remember my dad bringing home a transit laser that he would yell at me to not even look at, an would bring it in the house every night because it cost a small fortune. For 700-1500 you can get a really good laser that will pay for itself with the amount of time you will save. You'll get so use to it you'll start to wonder how you ever got by with out one.

    • @lsellclumanetsolarenergyll5071
      @lsellclumanetsolarenergyll5071 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dylanrampage9360 So you know of any Laser level which can shoot me a laser up to 1000ft ? I still looking for one which don't break the bank.

  • @dobermanpac1064
    @dobermanpac1064 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I contracted grade work for decades with a water level. So did the Egyptians when they built the Pyramids.

  • @timford6019
    @timford6019 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The water is always perfect, gravity works, but it takes patience and experience to get it right. Takes time ($$) where the laser is fast and easy and properly set up and confirmed you can count on repeatability. I had a Robo Laser long ago and built a lot with it. After some tweaks out of the box (checked with a water level) it was good and no detector needed. Wish they were still in business.

  • @carlweeks9256
    @carlweeks9256 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's this simple! Gravity DOES NOT LIE!! The water level method has been used for centuries!

  • @slelliott14
    @slelliott14 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Water level will change on both ends so could easily be 1/16” off. While both work, I’ve checked both with a transit as well, water level is most likely to have user error

  • @ryteulopki8069
    @ryteulopki8069 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you use multiple hoses with "central bucket" then there is no significant difference in speed. You only need clear tubing at the end of you lines. Rest can be done with heavy duty and/or cheap hose. Water works in all lighting conditions, in mist, dust, round the corner and at any distance... and no level of abuse will ever throw it off the calibration!! You can wack it around your truck, throw it around work site, drive over with digger and drop it from the roof with no worries. Accuracy is guaranteed by nature.
    After you done all hose fit inside the bucket so storage is comparable to the laser set - with the difference in cost and fragility of the system ;)

  • @tom2659
    @tom2659 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lasers are very convenient but I like that the water level doesn't accumulate error like a laser level.

  • @mastex5575
    @mastex5575 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The laserlevel is perfect for the initial leveling.
    If you are in a masonry house you already have walls in the way of your laser, so you would need to reset the height on the laserlevel for every room to get the same height.
    With the waterlevel it's easy to get the level in different rooms all across a house...
    I say there is no right tool for every job in the world...

  • @barrylitchfield250
    @barrylitchfield250 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both the water level and the laser level are great tools. A person that does sloppy, careless work, or is not properly trained, could make either tool inaccurate and could seriously screw up a job.

  • @Cam2Art
    @Cam2Art 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Before lasers the water level was the only solution. Lasers have a built in specified inaccuracy, usually a fraction of an inch per 100 feet. But there is no question much more efficient, and can be used to resolve tilted plane demarcation, for example, cathedral ceilings.

  • @SuperNitmar
    @SuperNitmar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What did they use century’s ago to hold the water before plastic tubing. Some sort of vine or similar ?

  • @AlexApol
    @AlexApol 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! The only reason I would give the win to the laser, is if you have joker coworkers and somebody steps on the water level while you are marking points.

  • @mavenfeliciano1710
    @mavenfeliciano1710 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For some reason laser levels are typically advertised +-1/8”.
    With water levels, it not only needs to settle but have any air bubbles expelled. Also, the water and the tube can expand and contract with heat and cold. And if some water drips out or is removed it needs to be recalibrated.

    • @DBrisky37
      @DBrisky37 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you use a bucket reservoir type you don't need to recalibrate if a touch spills out

  • @gutsngorrrr
    @gutsngorrrr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The water level is great for anyone to use as it's cheap and simple to use. The laser needs deep pockets and training to use.

    • @dbmail545
      @dbmail545 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a fact, Jack! A LASER level is only as good as its setup.

    • @brettmoore3194
      @brettmoore3194 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Water is level ,fact. Every foundation has to be measured,squared and level. Water level is better because if you have objects in front of the laser it can't operate, with water you can

    • @tonyg9511
      @tonyg9511 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The training to use a laser takes about 1 minute it's pretty simple.

  • @jamesstanlake4064
    @jamesstanlake4064 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not sure if they still make it but Zircon (the stud finder people) made a electronic water level where you drove a nail or another attachment method to a surface and one person could move the other end of the hose around and the sensor beeped when the water mark was level. A one man water level. What other device can you spend so little that does that much?

  • @johnc8112
    @johnc8112 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video water has been around for many years, Lazer level for new generation.

  • @ctbsancho2516
    @ctbsancho2516 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I say they cancel each other out by a 1/16. So you're dead on! I always check my lasers against water and plumb bobs.

  • @jameshuban6515
    @jameshuban6515 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The concept of the water level is sound. Looking at the product specs. of laser levels will show a small variance in accuracy. This variance will magnify the further away from the source. That said. I have never had much luck with the water level. I think it's the operator :-) The best tool is only as good as the operator.

    • @flat6fever680
      @flat6fever680 ปีที่แล้ว

      Truth. My friend always says: "you need to be smarter than the tool you are working with" or something like that 😄

    • @jameshuban6515
      @jameshuban6515 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@flat6fever680 So true. My variance of that statement is - the tool is as smart as the operator. In my case it can be stupid. 😉😉

  • @hayes7jm
    @hayes7jm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    String a line across the poles on both sides and see which one doesn't line up in the middle.

    • @Ferndalien
      @Ferndalien 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lines will sag. At the distances he is measuring, a line will certainly sag if it's not pulled very very tight. A breeze can throw it off, too.

  • @rubenvarela4077
    @rubenvarela4077 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The water level is sopt on but laser is faster

    • @fotogfitzfoto412
      @fotogfitzfoto412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only after it's set up and levelled.

  • @martinschulz9381
    @martinschulz9381 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video laser levels can vary between brands and from one to the next but any water level is dead nut. Some form of water level has been used since the beginning of building. The pyramids in Egypt and the coliseum in Rome were built with some form of water level system.
    That being said the building industry is going to go with fast easy laser.

  • @jtreedog409
    @jtreedog409 ปีที่แล้ว

    well the water level is a lot cheaper but the lazer would be nice to have . did you just buy the clear tube and do you plug the ends ?

  • @abdonmorales7361
    @abdonmorales7361 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I being using laser levels for almost 21 years my favorite it's the spectra physics laserplane 500 very accurate even after being knocked down twice on the concrete

  • @stephenmkollarjr1630
    @stephenmkollarjr1630 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    old school is the best in some situations cool beans

  • @bigcartoonyIIV
    @bigcartoonyIIV 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it was margin of error. I brought my laser lever back, and got one with a better receiver. Now it works like a champ

  • @BillyLapTop
    @BillyLapTop 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting. I wonder if a water level was used to build the Egyptian Pyramids?

  • @horizontarn
    @horizontarn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What distance can you go to..? Before the water level stops working?

  • @kmbytt984
    @kmbytt984 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have to compensate 8 inches per mile with the water level? To compensate for "sea curve" like on the "curvizion"? I was told water wont stay level cuz we live on a bubble and not on a plane.

  • @smokintruker27
    @smokintruker27 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    When I did concrete forms we used both but preference was water level

  • @brandoniron4011
    @brandoniron4011 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Water level for the win. No annoying sounds. Speed isn’t something I’m to worried about when trying to set something as important as control marks. Only thing that can be annoying with a water level is it’s sometimes difficult to use with only one person. But it can be done with a little work.