Tech leaders discuss A.I. ethics and regulation at Aspen Ideas Festival

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 มิ.ย. 2023
  • Entrepreneur Eric Schmidt, professor Walter Isaacson, and MIT dean Daniel Huttenlocher discuss how to regulate A.I. while maximizing its positive influence. NBCUniversal News Group is the media partner of Aspen Ideas Festival.
    » Subscribe to NBC News: nbcnews.to/SubscribeToNBC
    » Watch more NBC video: bit.ly/MoreNBCNews
    NBC News Digital is a collection of innovative and powerful news brands that deliver compelling, diverse and engaging news stories. NBC News Digital features NBCNews.com, MSNBC.com, TODAY.com, Nightly News, Meet the Press, Dateline, and the existing apps and digital extensions of these respective properties. We deliver the best in breaking news, live video coverage, original journalism and segments from your favorite NBC News Shows.
    Connect with NBC News Online!
    NBC News App: smart.link/5d0cd9df61b80
    Breaking News Alerts: link.nbcnews.com/join/5cj/bre...
    Visit NBCNews.Com: nbcnews.to/ReadNBC
    Find NBC News on Facebook: nbcnews.to/LikeNBC
    Follow NBC News on Twitter: nbcnews.to/FollowNBC
    Get more of NBC News delivered to your inbox: nbcnews.com/newsletters
    #AI #GenerativeAI #AspenIdeasFestival

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @SaberToothBicycle
    @SaberToothBicycle ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We're a social species. If forced into social situations--but with an incomplete social structure--we wind up with issues.
    On our highways, we discovered this--via Road Rage. People feel both alone and anonymous on the freeways--in their vehicles--and there's no "sanction" function on our highways. If someone acts antisocially, "what are you gonna do--hit me?" creates in their minds an entitlement-to-misbehave.
    Recognizing the threat, we've passed laws against Road Rage.
    On our Social Media platforms, people feel both alone and anonymous behind their computer keyboards--and there's no "sanction" function on the internet. If someone acts antisocially, they know they're "untouchable" by the person on the other end. There's no "punch him in the face" button on their keyboard. "what are you gonna do? Nothing." creates in their minds the same entitlement-to-misbehave.
    Recognizing the threat, we simply have to mandate intensive human moderation--of Social Media.
    Moderation isn't "optional". Social media works just fine--with effective moderation.
    And if America can't figure that out--the rest of the world can mandate if for them.

    • @WeylandLabs
      @WeylandLabs ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We are a social species no doubt !
      But how would one define social five thousand year ago ? - We needed to be social to survive create or join groups to form tribes, armys, and societies for civilizations. What I'm saying is its obviously not five thousand year ago so whats changed ?
      We did ! We change even 500 years ago 50 years ago we are evolving intellectually and thus making tools to speed up that process today. Huamns today ingeneral feel more lonely than ever, nobody see this is another transition period. Thats how humans get better that's how evolve faster, People are going to continue to feel alone. Today being social is different and as the next generation learns to adapt mentally and emotionally to things being social will change and evolve.
      But lets ask ourselves why do they feel alone, what on are planet do we help so much to feel this way ? Advertising/Marketing consume consume consume ... Big Tech algorithms are feeding our neural transmitters now, got to have that next dopamine hit for a like or sub right ?
      To misbehave in society is a form of depression or mental health problem, conformity and rebellion is the same thing in human-nature. Personally I think social media is like having a beer or a glass of wine. I belive with more innovations to A.I we wont have a lot of the problems we have today.
      And our country - is at a very low point in the political process today. Our society is outgrowing the political system faster than they can understand. And that's a cause for concern. in the world today. It exposes the system and factures our demcracy, because the rich want to stay rich and the poor stay poor.
      A.I will be able to fix so much but it will expose everything and break systems meant for the one percent.
      *Example:* AGI will find a cure to a disease in the future I'm sure of it ! But the chain reaction has an effect on people in power, that pharmaceutical drug for treatment they have shares in will tank. That will lose people billions if not trillions across the planet.
      Will it help save humans yes but at what cost for the wealthy, we legitamily have evil human beings on the planet that have no moral compass for human life. A.I or AGI is a threat to them and they understand that... Theres a bigger picture here about control not regulations...
      War keeps people distracted, innovation gets people's attention, fear gets people to react, and love helps people to strive.

  • @lisaharper1827
    @lisaharper1827 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So maybe a pause isn’t such a bad idea.

  • @Sanford
    @Sanford ปีที่แล้ว

    Right out of the movie “Eagle Eye”

  • @totalrestoration2280
    @totalrestoration2280 ปีที่แล้ว

    No individual group, corporate or government entity should have the power to target a 1 individual using large scale advance surveillance and AI. Especially at the expense of the individual righting their wrongs, attempts to get on the right side of law, providing prosperous living for oneself, and maintaining healthy physical and mental health.

  • @claracalifornia
    @claracalifornia ปีที่แล้ว

    No data is better than bad data. bad data in.... bad choices out. I know! I know in my undertreated painful bones....... I am victim of medical identity theft. I scream in pain and I'm chased out of emergency rooms by security guards. Go figure..... a 250,000 cap on medical malpractice makes it hard to prove I am in pain in a civil court.

  • @totalrestoration2280
    @totalrestoration2280 ปีที่แล้ว

    That my problem ... not worrying about the harm it could do to a single individual. Which i understand when developing regulations but if 100 people get together and decide they can benefit extremely at the opression of 1 individual using AI. The 100 people will have excessive force and advantage and the individual will not have proper representation within the scheme.

  • @claracalifornia
    @claracalifornia ปีที่แล้ว

    Could AI be used to sabotage your neighbors?

  • @ericalouie4548
    @ericalouie4548 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Turn off the wifi

  • @johnsolberg5611
    @johnsolberg5611 ปีที่แล้ว

    The beast system is arising

  • @dwight6469
    @dwight6469 ปีที่แล้ว

    The EU AI Act is exactly what's needed. It has three tiers for application: unacceptable risk, high risk, and low risk. It's an excellent regulation and why these Aspen ghouls don't like it. You don't need input from industry, you just need smart regulators like EU

    • @WeylandLabs
      @WeylandLabs ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Until those regulators get corrupted and influenced by mega-corporations or another power. Then what ... humans are known to be flawed by greed.

    • @galemartin9155
      @galemartin9155 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frank Herbert wrote about all this in the Dune series. He also left instructions on how one protests themselves from it.

  • @SaberToothBicycle
    @SaberToothBicycle ปีที่แล้ว

    This entire discussion is horrifying--and these characters are ghoulish.
    If military AI technology makes a misidentification--does the human who switched it on--face the UCMJ charges?
    AI is crap for social applications.
    However, AI is effective for modeling large complex systems. And every time AI is used to model our global economic infrastructure, the models demand decentralization.

  • @MJ-mg6jy
    @MJ-mg6jy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mr. Pence Kamaswamy