Lionel outfit 1401, the least expensive set for 1946

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @joshuacampbell9990
    @joshuacampbell9990 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    While we all gravitate towards the high end 726s, 671s, and the like, it’s nice to see someone else who appreciates the lower line that Lionel produced. It’s those sets that basically paid the bills for Lionel because they were cheap enough to put under many Christmas trees and get people started with model railroading. I have a few Scout sets that I just love the absolute cheapness of them. It’s probably because in my other hobby of cars and hot rods, I love the cheap stripper models that were just basic transportation. Great video!!

  • @johnknippenberg-LandmarkYards
    @johnknippenberg-LandmarkYards 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You have excellent ephemera to go with the sets, very cool. 😎👍 I use 1121 turnouts, which work well with single reduction motors. But I have no desire to service sealed motors so I shy away from them. Great looking set!

    • @alsvintagetoytrains7042
      @alsvintagetoytrains7042  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks! I have no desire to change the O-Gauge track on this layout. However, my second layout (work in progress) has one mainline loop without any switches that I can run this engine, and a couple others, without issues.

  • @joeystrains.9316
    @joeystrains.9316 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s in clean shape, great video.

  • @johnfroio4910
    @johnfroio4910 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Happy Easter.
    Nice clean set, you’ve got a nice one!

  • @TomzTrainzandAccessories
    @TomzTrainzandAccessories 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very nice set. Your title has a typo. It says set #1403. You can edit that. Even though it’s the least expensive set, it was still made very well. Very cool piece of Lionel history with this set, and your information is excellent on this. Tom

    • @alsvintagetoytrains7042
      @alsvintagetoytrains7042  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the catch on the typo! I fell asleep before the upload was completed as it was close to midnight. Lol. Glad you enjoyed the video.

    • @TomzTrainzandAccessories
      @TomzTrainzandAccessories 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@alsvintagetoytrains7042 No problem on the typo. I get bleary eyed too. LOL As with ALL of your videos and your collection of Postwar trains, it was outstanding!! Tom

  • @therosejewelrailroad489
    @therosejewelrailroad489 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very nice set. I think we steer towards the more expensive sets. But in reality Lionel probably sold a lot more sets at the lower price points. I know I can relate to sets at this price point as a kid. I enjoyed this video. Ken

    • @alsvintagetoytrains7042
      @alsvintagetoytrains7042  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One of the references mentioned it was a popular set and that Lionel produced a second production run.

  • @Wiencourager
    @Wiencourager 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The e unit tripping issue can be fixed by adding a pickup on one of the tender trucks.

    • @alsvintagetoytrains7042
      @alsvintagetoytrains7042  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I thought about that, but I am too much of a purist to modify something in excellent original shape. My other layout, that is in progress of being set up, has a main line without switches for the purpose of running these.

    • @Wiencourager
      @Wiencourager 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@alsvintagetoytrains7042 it shouldn’t have that problem on 027 switches or Marx switches.

  • @FailureatRetirement
    @FailureatRetirement 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is that another of the same set right behind it?

    • @alsvintagetoytrains7042
      @alsvintagetoytrains7042  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good eye! The set behind it is outfit 1405W which has the same rolling stock cars, but with the 1666 engine and plastic whistling tender. I guess that would have made a good talking point that I could have covered.

    • @FailureatRetirement
      @FailureatRetirement 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@alsvintagetoytrains7042 cool. I just couldn’t quite get a good enough look at it and I was thinking that you would mention it since it was right there.

  • @plunkervillerr1529
    @plunkervillerr1529 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Marx guy here, cheap, cheap, that`s for me. If you use Marx turnoffs, it tisn`t a problem me. OK, bub?