I'd love someone in academia to reevaluate the s&p's valuation. I think its folly to gage today's markets using historical data. Today's biggest companies are all in technology, juxtaposed to the largest companies in the s&p back in the1990's. Maybe the s&p's fair value should raise from 17 to 25. Considering technology is at the forefront.
Isn’t that kind of the point of an interview? To ask someone questions and wait for an answer? Maybe his answers had too many words and not enough pictures.
th-cam.com/video/pRWi6hbifhM/w-d-xo.html
It would be interesting to have a debate between David Rosenberg and Ed Yardeni.
I love the books in the background, clearly shown on purpose.
Folks who have trophy books never have books that look used. What's up with that?
@
They are not pigs. You can read a book without destroying it.
@@joebagodonuts8119 Great. Try it and let us know how it goes.
He had financial books but still can't predict the future. Unless.
This guy is this decades' king of being wrong.
David shouldn't go into geopolitics. That's not his strong side.
hes got that zionist bias...just like donny
That's Kellogg, let me see Cheerios
I'd love someone in academia to reevaluate the s&p's valuation. I think its folly to gage today's markets using historical data. Today's biggest companies are all in technology, juxtaposed to the largest companies in the s&p back in the1990's. Maybe the s&p's fair value should raise from 17 to 25. Considering technology is at the forefront.
There is always " new technology" and it always bubbles and crashes.
Smart guy, sure but he never shuts up..... I've seen him on multiple sites.. the host can never get a word in edgewise
Better than listening to Scaramucci trash Trump
Isn’t that kind of the point of an interview? To ask someone questions and wait for an answer? Maybe his answers had too many words and not enough pictures.