Understanding y+ in CFD Part 1/2 - Aidan Wimshurst | The Science Circle
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2022
- 👉 Part 2: • Sizing inflation layer...
👉 My main channel: @JousefM
ONLINE PRESENCE
================
📈 APEX Consulting: theapexconsulting.com
🌍 My website - jousefmurad.com/
💌 My weekly science newsletter - jousef.substack.com/
📸 Instagram - / jousefmrd
🐦 Twitter - / jousefm2
#yplus
#engineering
#computationalfluiddynamics
🧠Part 2 of Aidan's talk: community.sci-circle.com/checkout/community-member
🌎 Science Courses: courses.jousefmurad.com/
That formula is wrong when I attached the wimshurst to inside rim of a tire and the brake shoes .
I got the wheels to generate energy with a wimshurst engine ..
Now all four wheels generate energy to recharge the system...
I’m rebuilding a wimshurst car from the wheels up ..
I also reverse engineering uss enterprise back to original wimshurst design...
I am not able to find the part 2 of the series
The second part is inaccessible...the link is not working
I am a CFD noob and trying to figure out how to set up my meshes in a way that will give me good results. A lot of information online is over my head. This was good to give me a good base understanding. Thank you
Thank you for this episode, and also thank you Aidan for your endless tutorial series.
Amazing talk!
Thank You Jousef!
Great talk! Thank you!
Very informational. Got a lot of insight on this !
Thank you very much fot the y+ explanation.
Amazing explanation of y+...
I added the wimshurst design to four wheels and rims to build a wimshurst car ..
The wheels recharge the cars electric system..
Is the part 2 still not available here ??
y+ is really a fancy Reynolds number in turbulent.
Thank you for the video. It was very informational. Can you give the references of the authors and books you found this information from?
Thanks Aidan @fluidmechanics101, Very useful as always!! Thanks very much
And also where can I find part 2?
is Second part available?
I found it funny when he said even the cfd engineers don't understand it. Yes its true they also don't understand it.
Funny part is that he also doesn't really understand it but good effort for laymen's understanding.
Ps: i do understand much more than him but even i lack lots of things. Wall area is surprisingly wide.
Ps2: just small note to reduce the yplus to value of half one cannot simply reduce the mesh size in half. Thats because friction velocity doesn't stay the same that you assumed to be constant while reducing the mesh size. (If it was constant there is no point in changing mesh as friction velocity is what decides shear rate.
Hilarious... I reverse engineering the uss enterprise back to original wimshurst design.
Damn I’m that good ...