That formula is wrong when I attached the wimshurst to inside rim of a tire and the brake shoes . I got the wheels to generate energy with a wimshurst engine .. Now all four wheels generate energy to recharge the system... I’m rebuilding a wimshurst car from the wheels up ..
I am a CFD noob and trying to figure out how to set up my meshes in a way that will give me good results. A lot of information online is over my head. This was good to give me a good base understanding. Thank you
Aidan explains really well and makes the learning process very straight forward. I got caught in the video, very interesting, every professor should take note on this video.
I found it funny when he said even the cfd engineers don't understand it. Yes its true they also don't understand it. Funny part is that he also doesn't really understand it but good effort for laymen's understanding. Ps: i do understand much more than him but even i lack lots of things. Wall area is surprisingly wide. Ps2: just small note to reduce the yplus to value of half one cannot simply reduce the mesh size in half. Thats because friction velocity doesn't stay the same that you assumed to be constant while reducing the mesh size. (If it was constant there is no point in changing mesh as friction velocity is what decides shear rate.
![[CFD] How Fine should my CFD mesh be?](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/60fDz2cVdy8/mqdefault.jpg)
![[CFD] How Fine should my CFD mesh be?](/img/tr.png)
🧠Part 2 of Aidan's talk: community.sci-circle.com/checkout/community-member
🌎 Science Courses: courses.jousefmurad.com/
That formula is wrong when I attached the wimshurst to inside rim of a tire and the brake shoes .
I got the wheels to generate energy with a wimshurst engine ..
Now all four wheels generate energy to recharge the system...
I’m rebuilding a wimshurst car from the wheels up ..
I also reverse engineering uss enterprise back to original wimshurst design...
I am not able to find the part 2 of the series
The second part is inaccessible...the link is not working
I am a CFD noob and trying to figure out how to set up my meshes in a way that will give me good results. A lot of information online is over my head. This was good to give me a good base understanding. Thank you
Perfect description of Y plus.
Aidan explains really well and makes the learning process very straight forward. I got caught in the video, very interesting, every professor should take note on this video.
Thank you for this episode, and also thank you Aidan for your endless tutorial series.
Very informational. Got a lot of insight on this !
Thank you very much fot the y+ explanation.
Amazing explanation of y+...
Amazing talk!
Thank You Jousef!
y+ is really a fancy Reynolds number in turbulent.
I added the wimshurst design to four wheels and rims to build a wimshurst car ..
The wheels recharge the cars electric system..
Thanks Aidan @fluidmechanics101, Very useful as always!! Thanks very much
Great talk! Thank you!
Is the part 2 still not available here ??
Thank you for the video. It was very informational. Can you give the references of the authors and books you found this information from?
is Second part available?
And also where can I find part 2?
What's the name of the paper?
I found it funny when he said even the cfd engineers don't understand it. Yes its true they also don't understand it.
Funny part is that he also doesn't really understand it but good effort for laymen's understanding.
Ps: i do understand much more than him but even i lack lots of things. Wall area is surprisingly wide.
Ps2: just small note to reduce the yplus to value of half one cannot simply reduce the mesh size in half. Thats because friction velocity doesn't stay the same that you assumed to be constant while reducing the mesh size. (If it was constant there is no point in changing mesh as friction velocity is what decides shear rate.
Hilarious... I reverse engineering the uss enterprise back to original wimshurst design.
Damn I’m that good ...