sovereign citizen, flat earth, no moon landing, JFK and Michael Jackson rising from the grave - makes me wonder if humans ability to employ critical thinking is slowly being bred out of our genome
I suppose your one of those people that believes everything the government tells you. Did you know that Social Security is a trust and you as being the beneficiary of the trust can use a 1099-a to pretty much buy anything over $600 that is for personal use. But you actually have to know what being a sovereign American is in order to use and understand how to use it.
If you live in the US then you need to follow the law. If you don’t like it there are many places you can move to. We follow the rule of law in the US. Sov Cit is just a fantasy played out by simpletons that don’t understand how the world works. Sadly this guy paid the price with his life.
@@lordsnail9128 ...You should go read the US Supreme Court case of Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 (1960)...There is no right to SS benefits and there is no trust fund. Also, there is no law that requires any American citizen to get one. The SS application even says that on the form, but then goes on to say that you, MAY, not be able to get a job. The "MAY" was put in there for a very important reason, as it makes the signed application a completely voluntary act, without threat, duress, or coercion. And just to illustrate the corruption coming from our wonderful govt, you actually, and they know this, won't be able to get a job without one.
Look this kid didn’t need to die, but his death was a consequence of his own actions. Resisting police and having a gun never ends well. He could have easily cooperated and this would have been a nothing burger.
@@DavidSpitzerLawDog maybe they understand the US government is just a corporation and must be holder-in-due-course of a valid contract or commercial agreement before their policies apply to them. That's the Clearfield doctrine ...
@@Totes_ma_Goat ask the supreme court, they are the ones that decided it. The Corporate Conception of the State and the Origins of Limited Constitutional Government-Washington University Journal of Law and Policy. Vol. 6, Number 1, 2001 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(3) TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 79 > § 7701 § 7701. Definitions (a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof- (3) Corporation The term “corporation” includes associations, joint-stock companies, and insurance companies. 28 U.S.C. §3002(15)(A) United States Code TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE PART VI - PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 176 - FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE SUBCHAPTER A - DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 3002. Definitions (15) ''United States'' means - (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States. New Orleans Gas Co. v. Louisiana Light Co., 115 U.S. 650 (1885): The court held that the first company's charter was a contract between it and the state, within the protection of the constitution of the United States, and that the charter to the last company was therefore null and void., Mr. Justice DAVIS, delivering the opinion of the court, said that, if anything was settled by an unbroken chain of decisions in the federal courts, it was that an act of incorporation was a contract between the state and the stockholders, 'a departure from which now would involve dangers to society that cannot be foreseen, would shock the sense of justice of the country, unhinge its business interests, and weaken, if not destroy, that respect which has always been felt for the judicial department of the government.' [New Orleans Gas Co. v. Louisiana Light Co., 115 U.S. 650 (1885)] 19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations §883 (2003) [Legal encyclopedia] "A foreign corporation is one that derives its existence solely from the laws of another state, government, or country, and the term is used indiscriminately, sometimes in statutes, to designate either a corporation created by or under the laws of another state or a corporation created by or under the laws of a foreign country." "A federal corporation operating within a state is considered a domestic corporation rather than a foreign corporation. The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state." [19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations, §883 (2003)] 19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations §886 (2003)[Legal encyclopedia] "A corporation is a citizen, resident, or inhabitant of the state or country by or under the laws of which it was created, and of that state or country only." [19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations, §886 (2003)] Ngiraingas v. Sanchez, 495 U.S. 182 (1990): At common law, a "corporation" was an "artificial perso[n] endowed with the legal capacity of perpetual succession" consisting either of a single individual (termed a "corporation sole") or of a collection of several individuals (a "corporation aggregate"). 3 H. Stephen, Commentaries on the Laws of England 166, 168 (1st Am. ed. 1845). The sovereign was considered a corporation. See id., at 170; see also 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries *467. Under the definitions supplied by contemporary law dictionaries, Territories would have been classified as "corporations" (and hence as "persons") at the time that 1983 was enacted and the Dictionary Act recodified. See W. Anderson, A Dictionary of Law 261 (1893) ("All corporations were originally modeled upon a state or nation"); 1 J. Bouvier, A Law Dictionary Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States of America 318-319 (11th ed. 1866) ("In this extensive sense the United States may be termed a corporation"); Van Brocklin v. Tennessee, 117 U.S. 151, 154 (1886) ("`The United States is a . . . great corporation . . . ordained and established by the American people'") (quoting United [495 U.S. 182, 202] States v. Maurice, 26 F. Cas. 1211, 1216 (No. 15,747) (CC Va. 1823) (Marshall, C. J.)); Cotton v. United States, 11 How. 229, 231 (1851) (United States is "a corporation"). See generally Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518, 561-562 (1819) (explaining history of term "corporation"). [Ngiraingas v. Sanchez, 495 U.S. 182 (1990)] Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 870 F. Supp. 2d 1278, 1287 (W.D. Okla. 2012) “Corporations have constitutional rights in some circumstances, such as the right to free speech, but the rights of corporate persons and natural persons are not coextensive. Courts have not extended all constitutional rights to all corporations.” [Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 870 F. Supp. 2d 1278, 1287 (W.D. Okla. 2012)] Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 519; 10 L.Ed. 274 (1839):
@@Totes_ma_Goat The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia." This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land. I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28, 3002, 15 (A) (B) (C) (15) “United States” means- (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. : Non-profit Delaware Corporation : Incorporation Date 4/19/89 : File No. 2193946
It doesn't apply to you and it clearly doesn't protect you... The law of the land is the Constitution not legislative decree🤦 Also Americans are sovereign they're not "sovereign citizens" however they are sovereign, look to the case of Chisholm versus Georgia, the first great Supreme Court case🤦
@Jasper Chance At least we have freedom of speech here. That's why in your country people think they aren't crazy because your government tells you how to think and what to do.
Statutes and codes don't apply to us! They consider people dead at sea, this is why our mail comes in all capital letters, they created a straw man which is a paper version of you, so that they can tax your strawman!
You my friend are wrong! It is the ideology of what the world and people like you allow to happen to others. This one ripple and loss effects us all! They have no right stopping anyone without a crime. They made a Theft pack that supposedly gives them a right to stop any car they want. Not all cars are motor vehicles but that's for another time because by your statement alone, it looks like i will be wasting my constructive time to explain it to you. We follow God's law which out ranks man's law. We do certain actions to certain things. Like stop at a red light so others waiting can go! Its morals people need to watch and we are all responsible for ourselves, nobody else. And well cops and sheriffs who get their retirement funds from the General Fund is the wrong here. Because it gives them incentive to stop as many people a month as they can in order to build up the retirement payments they will receive. And i see no service to others in that...
@@iv2sab512 I make my own choices this is why am un-vaccinated because i have the ability of logical critical thinking I didn't make excuses that I had no choice" we always have a choice " the fact that a lot of people didn't make a choice you invertedly made choices I made myself not my parents anyone that blames their parents for who they are are not critical logical thinkers very simple mathematics
Tell us about the laws of the land. I am guessing you are completely ignorant, where does this thing called law come from? How many jurisdictions of law are there?
Allan didn't just think he was immune to the laws of the land, he also thought he was immune to the law of averages: IE the odds of taking on 5 armed cops by himself. Reality has a very effective way of showing off the results of that error.
It's a fact, we are only bound to the law of the land not these statutes, those only apply to the corporations which we are not, they consider you've done it see using maritime law. According to the law of the land you are allowed to travel without a driver's license if you are not using your vehicle to make money.
There is no need to leave when nobody can be expatriated from the nation state of their birth origin and you have public records showing you to be born in the nation state and not in the fictional geometric plane or Corporate Defacto Color of Law ( which means color of and appearing to be but not actually in fact law ). Who was here first private and living Citizens of the united states of America or UNITED STATES citizens ? People really need to learn the difference because there is a HUGE difference. One is a lawful bloodline American entitled to the same imunities that a Native American would be entitled to as original lawful bloodline Americans while the other came about after 1933 and they are in fact considered enemies of the state and public enemy combatants who are belligerents ( and thus they need licenses to do everything from getting married to hunting because they are prisoners of war and are basically sureties and slaves ). If you do not believe me then you might just want to look into essays by Rourke and Philips on private Equity and you "might" just want to go an read the Emergency War Powers Act, the Trading With The Enemies Act, and also the Emergency Banking Relief Act. Don't believe me, wait until you see the wording in "their own laws and statutes" confirming what I am telling you. Why would private Americans be the only real Americans ? This might just be because the people who accepted and gave consent ( by presumption ) to become public enemies of the STATE were made sureties to the World Banks because the UNITED STATES is Bankrupt and has been for a long time. I defy anyone to find an Executive Order by the President ( ever) or an Act of Congress, or any Positive Law showing that we left our status of Martial Law which was enacted in 1917. You won't find it because it does not exist and that MUST exist if they enact it. It doesn't just go away. The President or Congress would have had to end Martial Law which means we are still under guess "what" ? Have you ever wondered why you always hear the President or other "public" figures say "State of Emergency" but they never say Martial Law anymore ? That is because you cannot issue Martial Law when we are already under it, when all performance by the corporations is compelled by the military under the 11th amendment and when the whole UNITED STATES is a corporation with its STATES being subsidiary corporations all operating by compelled performance ( See Article 1 Section 10 ) under the constitution and where the entire corporate fiction UNITED STATES is "bankrupt" and has been since 1933. Why do you think they passed House Joint Resolution 192 and then tried to rename it and hide it from the people by naming it House Bill 73-10 ( Currently Public Law 73-10 ) and then they play dumb when you ask them about HJR 192 ? You people are being lied to Go and study your constitution and your laws and you will see that what I am saying is true and is correct. If you have any wisdom you will start studying these things and mostly your Bible.
@@shagy9560 actually. Nationals don't vote man. They are not US citizens. Chase was American State National. His passport will reflect that to be fact.
Forget about the sovereign stuff, that kid had a firearm on his person that he didn't tell the cops about. Hugh lack of understanding as to the risk of carrying. Cops can not afford to be second in a gun fight. If Chase had told the cops about the gun, he would still be alive today to fight his goofy sovereign citizen fight.
I blame his mother for his death. She pulled the sovereign citizen thing a year ago, and then filed a lawsuit against the Farmington police department. Unfortunately, her teachings and lies are the cause of Chase's death...
Every citizen is sovereign Glenn. It's a play on words. The kid was a national of the United States of America. American State national to be specific. His passport reflects this statement.
The news is trying to cover up what happen because the Allen family knows the law and cops are about to lose everything. A little bit of education goes a long way.
@@Alex-qw6re lol. Ok. Because the news often sides with police haha. This family doesn't know anything. Sovereign citizen isn't a thing. If you think it is, you're fooling yourself.... If you live in this country you have to abide by its laws. That goes for everyone.
@@wraynephew6838 he did as you can see his hand moving towards it. The body cams don't show everything. If you look like and act like you're about to be a deadly threat you're met with deadly force. They are not required to wait until one of them is shot and killed to react... Do some research. Clearly you don't understand the laws and also what can and does happen every day when someone reaches for a gun.
Fantasy? What fantasy is that? He gave his life for a truth that has been deceptively stolen. And if you don't believe that you will pay the steepest price. Dying for one's rights is a small price to pay for freedom. However, ignorantly but willfully subjecting oneself to slavery, carries a high cost indeed! And all those who 👍'd Steven's statement ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You are perfect, ignorant slaves, and you will pay with a lifetime of servitude. It's okay tho because everyone around you is living the same deception. Someone wakes up and brings it into your awareness and you say things like 'his family has been perpetuating a fantasy.' Here's news: The country you call home was founded on the same fantasies, and you have turned your back on that blessing! Fools mock!
Just because you have no idea what this “movement” is, doesn’t mean it’s a fantasy. It’s worth looking into if you value freedom. I don’t think I want to revoke my citizenship but I support people who do
@@littlecupofjoe1201 there is nothing to look into. It’s a delusion. You can’t live in the US without being a citizen or have explicit permission from the feds ( aliens )
That’s what they get for being sovereign citizens. How are they allowed to just not pay taxes, no insurance and no registration . That so unfair for all the other people.
From what I've seen, Once you complete the paperwork, the IRS sends you a letter stating you are no longer required to pay taxes or be drafted into the military. I'm not sure if there are any other "perks".
They are not, just like you are not allowed to steal stuff from a store. People just do it. If they are caught, then they are arrested. If you are driving without insurance, you will get a ticket, sovereign citizen nonsense or not, you still get a ticket or are arrested. The IRS in no way is going to let you not pay taxes. You have to do it even if you live in another country, you still have to pay taxes to the IRS.
Nope...no taxes to the I.R.S. ...only if you are engaged in a revenue taxable activity. Is your corporation building bombs for the military? NO? So your corporation is engaged in a federal perogative...and shows a profit? Read: "Cracking the code"... extensive research. Study...learn the law. They wanted my books and records. So I sent em a bunch of romance novels and some old 45 r.p.m. vinyl disks. If you are not having fun, you aren't doing it right!
I may believe that I am 10' tall I may believe that I am the richest man in the world I may believe that I am the greatest atlete in the world Just because I believe something, it does not necessarily make it to be _true_ because I still have to live in this world, in this reality. "What does it mean to be a sovereign citizen in the US?" Answer: nothing. Because you are delusional.
That may be what it means to you. But to me it means I don’t support the government the government does not support me I pay for my own stuff I work for my own stuff I don’t need your city To override my constitutional rights
Chase Allen should have been driving in whatever country he was a sovereign citizen of. Just because he denounced his American citizenship doesn't mean he can do whatever the "H" he wants to, in my country America! Live in my country, follow my countries LAWS!
They renounce their U.S Citizenship meaning their corporate membership of the corporation not the country the United States of America but if everyone else is too dumb constitutionally from the law enforcement to courts why even bother trying 😂 most of what they say is actually true but if you go to prison and all the other convicts say 2+2=50 it’s 50 doesn’t matter if you’re right if you need to die to prove it
Let one of these guys crash into your car and they get out and say my bad I’m a sov citizen , see you later. You’d be glad that the police got rid of him.
Actually. Let me define crime for you. To a national. Crime = hurt property. Or person. Neither of this was present. He wasn't braking any law. Chase was American State National. Also..... Every citizen is sovereign smart one. 😉😄
No. After having seen many videos where sovereign citizens interacts with the police, I am surprised this did not happen before. Don't forget that SovCits have killed police too. I am hoping that people who are thinking about getting into this insanity, will think twice. The other group that runs a very high risk of injury, are the supposed 1st amendment auditors. They are going to be killed by members of the public, not necessarily the police.
@@juliaweber212 read the article. One it doesn’t say rather he pulled it or not, so neither of us no if he did or didn’t, but it also says he had a holster on his body and the gun was on the floor board. Now I can tell you my gun doesn’t just jump out of its holster on its own, and no responsible gun owner stows their firearm on the floor. And cops don’t shoot if they see a holstered firearm. So it’s a fairly logical guess to say he pulled it on them.
Cite the constitution, get told your not here for that, get called a sovereign citizen. Cite the UCC, get told you are not using it in the proper context, get called a fraud and a sovereign citizen. Cite the code of federal regulations, get told those are more like guidelines, get called a sovereign citizen. Be a law abiding "citizen" and honest, get jailed and finances taken. Retain a lawyer, become a ward of the court, get jailed and finances taken. "Represent yourself", get ignored and dishonored, get called a sovereign citizen and jailed. Cite supreme court cases that are before a certain date, get ignored, get jailed. Ask for help with food, "we will help but you have to look for work and once you get a job we will remove the help, but we as the government won't help you if you don't labor. When you work we will take a large portion of your income and give it back next year, if you don't let us have a portion we will take it or your property. When you purchase anything that isn't food we the government say you will pay 6% extra because you are operating in commerce. Cite corpus juris secundum, get told that it has no authority, get called a sovereign citizen. Question jurisdiction get told they have proved jurisdiction without needing proof and that jurisdiction is provided by being appointed as an official (jurisdiction is supposed to be set by the prosecutor), get called a sovereign citizen. Have your offspring taken illegally and unlawfully, get ignored in court, have your parental rights taken and given to adoption services, get arrested for kidnapping when you take your human offspring back, then get smeared and called a sovereign citizen. THESE ACTIONS BY OFFICIALS PROVE THEY ARE LIEING AND CRIMINALS.
Someone do a documentary on Sovereign citizen. The Govt obviously doesn't recognize these people, which is important if you they are going to commingle.
@@B_raddidk I’d say most are following the law it clearly says any rights that are changed to licensed privileges should be ignored and if the right to travel doesn’t apply to automobiles the right to free speech shouldn’t apply only and the right to bear arms shouldn’t apply to cartridge ammunition firearms
Seems like he didn’t want to acknowledge being caught at his own game…So, claiming this “sovereign citizen” nonsense, yet he has a U.S. Passport??? Can’t have it both ways, and his foolish actions cost him his life.
A better observation is to ask why has there been such a defiant rejection of establishment and government authority. I’d imagine this kid’s future was brighter than many of the places that you in the comments sit now. So why would he latch on to this? Could it be the circumstances we live in today? Weather that be the rise of the tea party and occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter or proud boys? The past 50 years of increasing corruption, inflating the USD, or the American dream becoming increasingly out of reach. Americans used to be the pinnacle of western culture. Now look at us… the lack of empathy or want to understand, what this kid or these people are frustrated about is alarming. It just goes to show you that we are rotting from the inside out. You people are sycophants and are part of the problem. Have an original thought, dont just be Boomer sheep lulled to sleep by Fox News, msnbc, or anyone for that matter. Don’t be lazy. Go find out before you make such definitive comment’s.
Sovereign citizen is a trick you're either sovereign or you are a citizen, you cannot be both at the same time. A sovereign governs himself a citizen is governed by a government
A officer yelled the word "gun", but, was a gun found ? It seems like a critical piece of information that should be made explicit in a news production such as this
There's no such thing as an individual "Sovereign" in any country. If you want to be "Sovereign" you need to live in your own country. Probably not possible in this day and age.
I prefer American national since a U.S citizen is an employee of a corporation 😂 but I do follow the laws I just disregard the laws against constitutional rights like it tells me to even says it’s my duty
"I don't believe in the US constitution and their laws do not apply to me, but according to the US constitution and their laws it is my right to..." Bro, you kidding me?
If you area on land of that jurisdiction you are subject to the laws. If you don't like it you need to change the law or get out! You are benefiting from our roads, economy, protection, emergency healthcare yet they dont want to contribute!
I just dont understand the thought process behind all of this sovereign citizen stuff? Why do you think your better than everyone else and that the laws dont apply to you? Its extreme arrogance and disrespect to our system and the public.
So if he caims sov citizen then would he be like an illegal alien? But aren't you beholden to the laws of whatever location your body is? Im trying to figdure this out but i feel the same way i felt when i looked into flat earth theory... its just not true...
@@frankw7091 what they're believing. Claiming that the laws do not apply to them. Or that the earth is flat for the other group. Their claims just aren't true.
@@BSpacc13 That's what I thought, I just wanted conformation. 6 years or so ago I saw my first sovereign citizen video on youtube. I was thinking great, someone found a major loop hole when it comes to traffic laws. But being a smart individual, I checked out their claims. It was clear to me that they cherry picked what they choose to believe, ignoring anything that disproves their beliefs. Sad people. I've been sparing with them ever since.
Gas taxes and those who use the roads for compensation pay for them. And, who is required to "pay" for use of public highways, as per: "The tax is placed upon those obtaining compensation for the use of the public highways." -In re Bush, 6 Cal.2d 43 [Crim. No. 3945. In Bank. April 1, 1936.] In the Matter of the Application of C.E.BUSH for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
It's actually true that road maintenance is financed by gas tax. So if a SovCit pays for gas and pays full price including tax, he IS financing the road with tax. Not to defend SovCit idiots, but that one claim is true.
@@oliverl.9004 from what I've seen, most "sovcit's" are just aware that the US government is just a corporation and before their policies apply they must be holder-in-due-course of a valid contract or commercial agreement. The Clearfield doctrine...
@@weytogomantruth but they fail in comprehending a birth certificate and ss card is a binding corporate contract for life and the constitution is null and void with the 14th amendment now you are subject to all company rules and regulations so you are not a freeman as mentioned in the constitution
i worked for an urban city in florida for 25yrs. this was complete preventable. that is not to say the officers will be charged. the driver was not being cooperative at all, that is not a death penealy citation, though. when, opening the door the the officer had fully body coverage of the suspect. the suspect could not move. when another officer just happens to yell "gun, gun, gun" the officer that had physical custody of the suspect (covering his body and the drivers seat) retreated and ran away and then the execution firing squad occurred. sad. i have been involved (investigated) dozens of these incidents. all the engaged officer had to do, was not let go of the suspect. if you have his hands, what is the suspect going to do? notice on the bodyCam's all claiming who shot? like 2nd graders who can have the answer first. amazing. yes and handcuff a critically, wounded suspect shot 8 times (one in the head and 7 in the chest) with the suspects hands behind his back as to restrict breathing and blood flow to his body. that was medically ingenuous move. the suspect is shot eight times with his hands dangling above his head...what "threat" is someone that had been neutralized can be. moral of the story: i am an us citizen retired and for the past 2yrs i have lived in argintina. no crime in my city, cops sit in the park and do nothing. saw 2 traffice stops in the years i hav been here and one was the drivers car broke down. kudos to the retired military man protesting the suspects death...at least the military know "discipline"; not an executors firing squad because someone wanted to yell "gun" three times.
So no crime in Argentina ? I am guessing you have never been to a Boca Juniors vs River Plate game. Plenty of illegal activities happening all over the stadium and spilling out onto the streets. Maybe the cops don't care. BTW its spelled Argentina. Considering you live there, you may want to know how its actually spelled.
He didn't declare he had a gun. It was heated. He was resisting. He switched hands for phone and was reaching towards the gun. Officers didn't have him secured, and even if they did he could break away and retrieve the weapon and shoot them. They were justified. Kid set up the situation in the worst possible ways. You are an ignorant if you believe there is no crime where you live in Argentina.
One whacko down... The story is completely wrong about people declaring themselves sovereign citizens. I can't remember the last time I heard somebody claim this moniker, though they continue to read from the same script. The term "sovereign citizen" has become such a joke that even sovtards will no longer claim it.
Laws do apply just not ones in conflict with the constitution such as the right to travel by way of automobile jk the 14th amendment took all that away
Maybe because your American rules are ridiculous low speed limits for example I would just class them as a suggestion regardless one of the most corrupt countries in the world but you Americans are so dumbed down
@@Jack-qv2ljRidiculous low speed limits? Are you crazy? They are there for a reason, you know? They are not suggestions, but enforced speed limits. Why do people hate driving safely??
He was following the rules disobedience to unconstitutional right to travel by automobile it literally tells you any right that is licensed to a privilege is null and void and should be ignored now if you aren’t traveling safely by automobile you are impeding others right to travel but it appears he forgot about the 14th amendment which makes all the other amendments null and void
I join I’m in Detroit . The police just wrongfully arrested me had me afraid for my life out of the blue. I’m so glad I survived and I’m so sorry we lost him. 🙏🏽🛐🧎🏽♀️🧘🏽♀️🫶🏽💜♾️ prayers up 🫂
What’s the debate here? Officers were doing their job and giving lawful orders and the suspect was very uncorporative and PULLED A GUN. What other outcome can be expected?
None of the videos released show him grabbing a gun. Closest they have is he switched hands with his phone. But in that video you can clearly see the department edited it his right hand is on his left arm. Wake up
Obviously he did not pull his gun. But one of the police officers believed he pulled his gun. And the officers are trained for such situations. In such situations they have to eliminate the threat. Was it Chase Allan's own fault that he was fatally shot? Absolutely. Because he did not inform the police about his weapon. He did not comply at all.
@@michael-101 b's the policy enforcement officers, knew exactly who Chase Allen was, they knew who his family is and they where well aware of his and the families status. As the family had a case against the department in federal court. It was a targeted assassination of a federal witness.
@@terrybelden876Can you prove that? And do you want to deny that he had a gun? One person here wrote: _"Cops can not afford to be second in a gun fight. If Chase had told the cops about the gun, he would still be alive today to fight his goofy sovereign citizen fight."_
@@michael-101 why would I deny he had a gun, it is a constitutionally protected right to be armed. Any code statute that deems that right illegal is null and void. Next he was not operating in commerce, the policy enforcers had no legitimate reason to even interact with him.
Since the 14th amendment we won’t ever be 😂 also made us employees thus taking away freeman status meaning the previous 13 amendments are basically null and void
Reilly maybe you don’t know it’s not about fair fights 😂 once there’s a deadly force it’s then the cops hands to eliminate the deadly threat as soon as possible.
@@Gangai263 😂😂you thought that kid was a deadly force? Gun was prob fake, unloaded, or planted later by the police. I mean you’re a complete joke siding with authority who are sellouts to humanity. Why don’t you start using your brain, look around and realize the bigger picture as to what’s going on. You’re a small minded simpleton so I doubt you can critically think.
"The United States of America Inc." Inc means INCORPORATED, and is a foreign corporation, providing governmental services to the people. Let it be known that they went through their third and final bankruptcy a few years ago, but don't take my word for it, look it up. The problem is they are subjecting the american people to foreign laws, that is not the law of this American land. The law of this land is the Public Law. Statutes and codes are different they apply to the their Corporation, and their employees, and or agents, and or officers, like company policy. But they have coerced the people by threat of armed force, and the color of law, that violations, like traffick infractions, are crimes. They have used it to generate revenue, but in truth they are committing crimes against the people that are unlawful. And they are doing it by force or threat of force. You all need to ask yourself, Why do police officers give their oath, they are sworn into a position of power, and then pretend that oath was never given. Most of them don't seem to know their oath, or care that they agreed to it.
They shouldn’t be anywhere but the United States as there would be no basis such as the constitutional amendments such as the right to travel and legally driving isn’t traveling but operation of a motor vehicle so the right doesn’t apply legally and neither do any other amendments since the 14th made us all employees of the U.S and removed our freeman status
The term "sovereign citizen" was created by the SovCits themselves. That's how they originally referred to themselves. Once the term acquired a stigma, they no longer wished to be associated with it and began calling themselves other things. That's when it became fashionable among SovCits to complain about the name, as you are doing. However, the name had already stuck. Like it or not, that's now the official term to describe people with your ideology.
sovereign citizen, flat earth, no moon landing, JFK and Michael Jackson rising from the grave - makes me wonder if humans ability to employ critical thinking is slowly being bred out of our genome
I suppose your one of those people that believes everything the government tells you. Did you know that Social Security is a trust and you as being the beneficiary of the trust can use a 1099-a to pretty much buy anything over $600 that is for personal use. But you actually have to know what being a sovereign American is in order to use and understand how to use it.
If you live in the US then you need to follow the law. If you don’t like it there are many places you can move to. We follow the rule of law in the US. Sov Cit is just a fantasy played out by simpletons that don’t understand how the world works. Sadly this guy paid the price with his life.
how many boosters you take?
Why aren't you wearing your mask? New covid variant might get you.
@@lordsnail9128 ...You should go read the US Supreme Court case of Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 (1960)...There is no right to SS benefits and there is no trust fund. Also, there is no law that requires any American citizen to get one. The SS application even says that on the form, but then goes on to say that you, MAY, not be able to get a job. The "MAY" was put in there for a very important reason, as it makes the signed application a completely voluntary act, without threat, duress, or coercion. And just to illustrate the corruption coming from our wonderful govt, you actually, and they know this, won't be able to get a job without one.
Look this kid didn’t need to die, but his death was a consequence of his own actions. Resisting police and having a gun never ends well. He could have easily cooperated and this would have been a nothing burger.
Chase is and is a nothing burger. The world is a better place with Chase nothing burger gone forever. LOL!
But isn't the earth flat?
@@Deontjie And the Moon is made of green cheese. LOL! What is your favourite conspiracy, and, why?
Yep the idiots are out tonight!!🤭🤣🎵🎶👍
He was absolutely a product of his own making. He must have followed the laws of the US for his gun permit but he is/was 100% at fault.
it means you fundamentally misunderstand how the Constitution and the law work
@@DavidSpitzerLawDog maybe they understand the US government is just a corporation and must be holder-in-due-course
of a valid contract or commercial agreement before their policies apply to them.
That's the Clearfield doctrine ...
😂 yea hows that worked out so far? 😂@@weytogoman
@@Totes_ma_Goat ask the supreme court, they are the ones that decided it.
The Corporate Conception of the State and the Origins of Limited Constitutional Government-Washington University Journal of Law and Policy. Vol. 6, Number 1, 2001
26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(3)
TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 79 > § 7701
§ 7701. Definitions
(a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof-
(3) Corporation
The term “corporation” includes associations, joint-stock companies, and insurance companies.
28 U.S.C. §3002(15)(A)
United States Code
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART VI - PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS
CHAPTER 176 - FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE
SUBCHAPTER A - DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 3002. Definitions
(15) ''United States'' means -
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
New Orleans Gas Co. v. Louisiana Light Co., 115 U.S. 650 (1885):
The court held that the first company's charter was a contract between it and the state, within the protection of the constitution of the United States, and that the charter to the last company was therefore null and void., Mr. Justice DAVIS, delivering the opinion of the court, said that, if anything was settled by an unbroken chain of decisions in the federal courts, it was that an act of incorporation was a contract between the state and the stockholders, 'a departure from which now would involve dangers to society that cannot be foreseen, would shock the sense of justice of the country, unhinge its business interests, and weaken, if not destroy, that respect which has always been felt for the judicial department of the government.'
[New Orleans Gas Co. v. Louisiana Light Co., 115 U.S. 650 (1885)]
19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations §883 (2003) [Legal encyclopedia]
"A foreign corporation is one that derives its existence solely from the laws of another state, government, or country, and the term is used indiscriminately, sometimes in statutes, to designate either a corporation created by or under the laws of another state or a corporation created by or under the laws of a foreign country."
"A federal corporation operating within a state is considered a domestic corporation rather than a foreign corporation. The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state."
[19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations, §883 (2003)]
19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations §886 (2003)[Legal encyclopedia]
"A corporation is a citizen, resident, or inhabitant of the state or country by or under the laws of which it was created, and of that state or country only."
[19 Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.), Corporations, §886 (2003)]
Ngiraingas v. Sanchez, 495 U.S. 182 (1990):
At common law, a "corporation" was an "artificial perso[n] endowed with the legal capacity of perpetual succession" consisting either of a single individual (termed a "corporation sole") or of a collection of several individuals (a "corporation aggregate"). 3 H. Stephen, Commentaries on the Laws of England 166, 168 (1st Am. ed. 1845). The sovereign was considered a corporation. See id., at 170; see also 1 W. Blackstone, Commentaries *467. Under the definitions supplied by contemporary law dictionaries, Territories would have been classified as "corporations" (and hence as "persons") at the time that 1983 was enacted and the Dictionary Act recodified. See W. Anderson, A Dictionary of Law 261 (1893) ("All corporations were originally modeled upon a state or nation"); 1 J. Bouvier, A Law Dictionary Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States of America 318-319 (11th ed. 1866) ("In this extensive sense the United States may be termed a corporation"); Van Brocklin v. Tennessee, 117 U.S. 151, 154 (1886) ("`The United States is a . . . great corporation . . . ordained and established by the American people'") (quoting United [495 U.S. 182, 202] States v. Maurice, 26 F. Cas. 1211, 1216 (No. 15,747) (CC Va. 1823) (Marshall, C. J.)); Cotton v. United States, 11 How. 229, 231 (1851) (United States is "a corporation"). See generally Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518, 561-562 (1819) (explaining history of term "corporation").
[Ngiraingas v. Sanchez, 495 U.S. 182 (1990)]
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 870 F. Supp. 2d 1278, 1287 (W.D. Okla. 2012)
“Corporations have constitutional rights in some circumstances, such as the right to free speech, but the rights of corporate persons and natural persons are not coextensive. Courts have not extended all constitutional rights to all corporations.”
[Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 870 F. Supp. 2d 1278, 1287 (W.D. Okla. 2012)]
Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 519; 10 L.Ed. 274 (1839):
@@Totes_ma_Goat if you know, you know ...
@@Totes_ma_Goat The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session.
I refer you to the "Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia."
This is also known as the "Act of 1871." What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia,
which is a ten mile square parcel of land.
I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28, 3002, 15 (A) (B) (C)
(15) “United States” means-
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.
: Non-profit Delaware Corporation
: Incorporation Date 4/19/89
: File No. 2193946
If the laws does not apply to them why should it protect them?
It doesn't apply to you and it clearly doesn't protect you... The law of the land is the Constitution not legislative decree🤦 Also Americans are sovereign they're not "sovereign citizens" however they are sovereign, look to the case of Chisholm versus Georgia, the first great Supreme Court case🤦
since when does the law protect anyone it's all made up and arbitrary
Foreigners must follow laws of foreign countries.
The law doesnt protect you, it enslaves you. Read up on the 14th amendment
Supreme Court ruled it is not the duty of officers to protect your life.... that's why I carry,practice with guns,knifes,non lethal to protect myself
A lot of psychiatric work needs to be done in the USA.
THIS
Yea killing a 25 yr old
@@katherinesciolino1447 that's the result of many mistakes, not just one.
@Jasper Chance At least we have freedom of speech here. That's why in your country people think they aren't crazy because your government tells you how to think and what to do.
@@TruthSeeker714 ok, I didn't know that we didn't have freedom of speech in Italy. Last time I checked It was in our constitution, though.
If they pay no taxes what makes them think they should be able to use the roads for free?
Roads are paid for with gas tax.... why should EV's use the roads for free?
@@JyroOne tax on gas is NOT the only source of tax used on roads dipshit.
Are people visiting from other countries allowed to use the roads?
@Kyle The Free you're one of the biggest problem with this country today, conservative bums wanting a free ride.
@@f__kyoudegenerates yes as long as they have an international driving permit. I think you may be unaware of those.
That young man was a victim of his parent's ideology.
WOW! i must not have been listening to the video very close. I didn't know that.
Statutes and codes don't apply to us! They consider people dead at sea, this is why our mail comes in all capital letters, they created a straw man which is a paper version of you, so that they can tax your strawman!
You my friend are wrong! It is the ideology of what the world and people like you allow to happen to others. This one ripple and loss effects us all! They have no right stopping anyone without a crime. They made a Theft pack that supposedly gives them a right to stop any car they want. Not all cars are motor vehicles but that's for another time because by your statement alone, it looks like i will be wasting my constructive time to explain it to you. We follow God's law which out ranks man's law. We do certain actions to certain things. Like stop at a red light so others waiting can go! Its morals people need to watch and we are all responsible for ourselves, nobody else. And well cops and sheriffs who get their retirement funds from the General Fund is the wrong here. Because it gives them incentive to stop as many people a month as they can in order to build up the retirement payments they will receive. And i see no service to others in that...
You are low IQ. I'm sorry your parents brought you up this way.
@@iv2sab512 I make my own choices this is why am un-vaccinated because i have the ability of logical critical thinking I didn't make excuses that I had no choice" we always have a choice " the fact that a lot of people didn't make a choice you invertedly made choices I made myself not my parents anyone that blames their parents for who they are are not critical logical thinkers very simple mathematics
I find it ironic this sovereign citizen doesn't have to follow the laws of the land, yet he was a student learning the laws.
are u talking about the cops
@cameraflyer don't we the people pay their taxes as well as wages , nd their employed by the corporation, of course they need a license
@@bubbalove5663 nope
Tell us about the laws of the land. I am guessing you are completely ignorant, where does this thing called law come from? How many jurisdictions of law are there?
@@bubbalove5663yes govt police are paid by us us citizens. Cops should watch their backs.
Well, he’s certainly independent of the laws of the land now.
A winner!
underrated comment
HAHAHA!!! More like under the land...
😄😄😄😄
😂😂😂
Allan didn't just think he was immune to the laws of the land, he also thought he was immune to the law of averages: IE the odds of taking on 5 armed cops by himself. Reality has a very effective way of showing off the results of that error.
BWAHAHA
True enough. These people are kooky. Live in America, abide by the laws. Without laws society devolves into chaos and anarchy.
@@astropioneer3296 Yup and SCs don't realise that anarchy is another form of tyranny.
Yeah, you might also wonder if he also lacked an understanding or physics.
This is the most accurate way of describing Allan.
Being a sovereign citizen means nothing. It's all gibberish.
It's a fact, we are only bound to the law of the land not these statutes, those only apply to the corporations which we are not, they consider you've done it see using maritime law. According to the law of the land you are allowed to travel without a driver's license if you are not using your vehicle to make money.
So Hogwash😂
Look forward to seeing you on TH-cam when you get snatched out of your car. 😂@@lisareyna532
@@lisareyna532😂 yea okay 👍 😂
@@lisareyna532 Everything you wrote is utter nonsense.
So, you have separated from the United States…but use all the resources provided by the United States and refuse to leave?
There is no need to leave when nobody can be expatriated from the nation state of their birth origin and you have public records showing you to be born in the nation state and not in the fictional geometric plane or Corporate Defacto Color of Law ( which means color of and appearing to be but not actually in fact law ). Who was here first private and living Citizens of the united states of America or UNITED STATES citizens ? People really need to learn the difference because there is a HUGE difference. One is a lawful bloodline American entitled to the same imunities that a Native American would be entitled to as original lawful bloodline Americans while the other came about after 1933 and they are in fact considered enemies of the state and public enemy combatants who are belligerents ( and thus they need licenses to do everything from getting married to hunting because they are prisoners of war and are basically sureties and slaves ). If you do not believe me then you might just want to look into essays by Rourke and Philips on private Equity and you "might" just want to go an read the Emergency War Powers Act, the Trading With The Enemies Act, and also the Emergency Banking Relief Act. Don't believe me, wait until you see the wording in "their own laws and statutes" confirming what I am telling you. Why would private Americans be the only real Americans ? This might just be because the people who accepted and gave consent ( by presumption ) to become public enemies of the STATE were made sureties to the World Banks because the UNITED STATES is Bankrupt and has been for a long time. I defy anyone to find an Executive Order by the President ( ever) or an Act of Congress, or any Positive Law showing that we left our status of Martial Law which was enacted in 1917. You won't find it because it does not exist and that MUST exist if they enact it. It doesn't just go away. The President or Congress would have had to end Martial Law which means we are still under guess "what" ? Have you ever wondered why you always hear the President or other "public" figures say "State of Emergency" but they never say Martial Law anymore ? That is because you cannot issue Martial Law when we are already under it, when all performance by the corporations is compelled by the military under the 11th amendment and when the whole UNITED STATES is a corporation with its STATES being subsidiary corporations all operating by compelled performance ( See Article 1 Section 10 ) under the constitution and where the entire corporate fiction UNITED STATES is "bankrupt" and has been since 1933. Why do you think they passed House Joint Resolution 192 and then tried to rename it and hide it from the people by naming it House Bill 73-10 ( Currently Public Law 73-10 ) and then they play dumb when you ask them about HJR 192 ? You people are being lied to Go and study your constitution and your laws and you will see that what I am saying is true and is correct. If you have any wisdom you will start studying these things and mostly your Bible.
Bro was cooking
Sovereign Citizens are so far down the rabbit hole.
Biden Voters
@@shagy9560 - Trump voters. See how that works 🤡
@Ordinary Member sovereign citizens reek’s liberalism
Every citizen is sovereign smart one. 😉😄
@@shagy9560 actually. Nationals don't vote man. They are not US citizens. Chase was American State National. His passport will reflect that to be fact.
Forget about the sovereign stuff, that kid had a firearm on his person that he didn't tell the cops about. Hugh lack of understanding as to the risk of carrying. Cops can not afford to be second in a gun fight. If Chase had told the cops about the gun, he would still be alive today to fight his goofy sovereign citizen fight.
They murdered him
@@veganskeletons4131 Nope
@@GuyBlondWithOutGod you're willfully ignorant
@@veganskeletons4131 official cause of death was actually stupidity
@@BlueBremner no it was being murdered by tyrants violating his rights to travel as a free man. You're willfully ignorant of the law.
I blame his mother for his death. She pulled the sovereign citizen thing a year ago, and then filed a lawsuit against the Farmington police department. Unfortunately, her teachings and lies are the cause of Chase's death...
Every citizen is sovereign Glenn. It's a play on words. The kid was a national of the United States of America. American State national to be specific.
His passport reflects this statement.
The news is trying to cover up what happen because the Allen family knows the law and cops are about to lose everything.
A little bit of education goes a long way.
@@Alex-qw6re lol. Ok. Because the news often sides with police haha. This family doesn't know anything. Sovereign citizen isn't a thing. If you think it is, you're fooling yourself.... If you live in this country you have to abide by its laws. That goes for everyone.
@@Alex-qw6re lol how many times are you going to edit and change your comment? That's 3 times now....
@@GlennPearsonDIY he has to make sure he gets it right. Or in this case, wrong.
Even Dr Grande believes the shooting was justified and he is usually right on. I would not support the sovcit movement.
Dr is a legend
I’m very suspicious of it. If it wasn’t a chess piece to be used by those in power, it likely wouldn’t be happening so easily.
Dr. Grande is a Materialist (delusional) and therefore, likely, some version of an intelligence asset.
That Sovereign Citizen thing didn’t work out too well for him.
@@wraynephew6838 he had a gun and intended to use it you idiot . You pull a gun on someone with a gun you will suffer the same consequences
Every citizen is sovereign smart one. 😉😄
@@wraynephew6838 I don’t think so. Chase had a gun and removed it from the holster. He won’t win.
@@wraynephew6838 they are allowed to shoot people who reach for a gun....
@@wraynephew6838 he did as you can see his hand moving towards it. The body cams don't show everything. If you look like and act like you're about to be a deadly threat you're met with deadly force. They are not required to wait until one of them is shot and killed to react... Do some research. Clearly you don't understand the laws and also what can and does happen every day when someone reaches for a gun.
Chase Allen got himself killed. Watch the video, he brought it upon himself entirely.
He gave his life for a fantasy his family has been perpetuating.
Fantasy? What fantasy is that? He gave his life for a truth that has been deceptively stolen. And if you don't believe that you will pay the steepest price.
Dying for one's rights is a small price to pay for freedom. However, ignorantly but willfully subjecting oneself to slavery, carries a high cost indeed!
And all those who 👍'd Steven's statement ought to be ashamed of yourselves. You are perfect, ignorant slaves, and you will pay with a lifetime of servitude. It's okay tho because everyone around you is living the same deception. Someone wakes up and brings it into your awareness and you say things like 'his family has been perpetuating a fantasy.' Here's news: The country you call home was founded on the same fantasies, and you have turned your back on that blessing! Fools mock!
Yep. Very sad.
Just because you have no idea what this “movement” is, doesn’t mean it’s a fantasy. It’s worth looking into if you value freedom. I don’t think I want to revoke my citizenship but I support people who do
@@littlecupofjoe1201 there is nothing to look into. It’s a delusion. You can’t live in the US without being a citizen or have explicit permission from the feds ( aliens )
@@littlecupofjoe1201 Then move to Afghanistan or some other lawless place.
APPLE, FALL, TREE
Very funny!
That’s what they get for being sovereign citizens. How are they allowed to just not pay taxes, no insurance and no registration . That so unfair for all the other people.
From what I've seen, Once you complete the paperwork, the IRS sends you a letter stating you are no longer required to pay taxes or be drafted into the military. I'm not sure if there are any other "perks".
They are not, just like you are not allowed to steal stuff from a store. People just do it. If they are caught, then they are arrested. If you are driving without insurance, you will get a ticket, sovereign citizen nonsense or not, you still get a ticket or are arrested. The IRS in no way is going to let you not pay taxes. You have to do it even if you live in another country, you still have to pay taxes to the IRS.
Nope...no taxes to the I.R.S. ...only if you are engaged in a revenue taxable activity. Is your corporation building bombs for the military? NO? So your corporation is engaged in a federal perogative...and shows a profit? Read: "Cracking the code"... extensive research. Study...learn the law. They wanted my books and records. So I sent em a bunch of romance novels and some old 45 r.p.m. vinyl disks. If you are not having fun, you aren't doing it right!
@@helengooding That never happened though.
Grifters who want to use public amenities and resources but don't want to pay their share.
I may believe that I am 10' tall
I may believe that I am the richest man in the world
I may believe that I am the greatest atlete in the world
Just because I believe something, it does not necessarily make it to be _true_ because I still have to live in this world, in this reality.
"What does it mean to be a sovereign citizen in the US?" Answer: nothing. Because you are delusional.
Way out, how people pretend that they dont support and celebrate this exact philosophy every 4th of July.
Basically the 14th amendment made us all U.S citizens instead of citizens of the u.s 😂 statutory citizenship and not constitutional citizenship
NO WE WILL NOT SUPPORT ALLAN OR HIS FAMILY. ABSOLUTELY NOT!!!
What does it mean to be a sovereign citizen in the U.S.?
It means you're a kook, and if you press the matter with police and courts, an inmate.
as it should be
If you don't want to be under the law of the land, they shouldn't be protected by any law of the land. Thus the officer isn't guilty
Delusionally paranoid mixed with malignant narcissist = sovereign super special and magically delicious citzens........
It means being a loser.
I'm waiting on the sovereign citizen tik tok challenge 😂
Bro they already have the challenge going every day this is insane😭
there is no such thing as a sovereign citizen in the US....
No such thing as a sovereign citizen. He was defiant and had a gun.
It's not illegal to have a gun.
@@jogginmcjoggerson2430 it becomes a problem when your defiant and your gun is found on floor board after a struggle. You must watch CNN.
@@jogginmcjoggerson2430 of course not, nobody said it was illegal why are you bring it up. MeoMiyo said nothing about it being illegal to have a gun.
@@brandanhall7189 Well he is a socialist if he believes this was justified.
What does it mean to be a sovereign citizen in the US? It means you are a loony.
That may be what it means to you. But to me it means I don’t support the government the government does not support me I pay for my own stuff I work for my own stuff I don’t need your city To override my constitutional rights
@@jasonsinor74So you're not a citizen, but you claim the constitutional rights of a citizen?
@@jasonsinor74then don’t use public roads that has been payed by TAXES
@@jasonsinor74 deluded fool
@@jasonsinor74now I’m interested in what the real meaning of sovereignty is🤔
Chase Allen should have been driving in whatever country he was a sovereign citizen of. Just because he denounced his American citizenship doesn't mean he can do whatever the "H" he wants to, in my country America! Live in my country, follow my countries LAWS!
They renounce their U.S Citizenship meaning their corporate membership of the corporation not the country the United States of America but if everyone else is too dumb constitutionally from the law enforcement to courts why even bother trying 😂 most of what they say is actually true but if you go to prison and all the other convicts say 2+2=50 it’s 50 doesn’t matter if you’re right if you need to die to prove it
What does it mean to be a SC in the USA? It means that mental health infrastructure is severely lacking.
@cameraflyer In the west generally. Eastern nations where you tend to have less rights don't tolerate this nonsense.
the pharma companies can push more pills on ppl to make em dumb and compliant
Let one of these guys crash into your car and they get out and say my bad I’m a sov citizen , see you later. You’d be glad that the police got rid of him.
Actually. Let me define crime for you. To a national.
Crime = hurt property. Or person. Neither of this was present. He wasn't braking any law. Chase was American State National.
Also.....
Every citizen is sovereign smart one. 😉😄
They wld be held financially responsible if they were at fault
@@Alex-qw6reNot what crime means. No they weren't
Way to justify their way not to be hold accountable
No. After having seen many videos where sovereign citizens interacts with the police, I am surprised this did not happen before. Don't forget that SovCits have killed police too. I am hoping that people who are thinking about getting into this insanity, will think twice. The other group that runs a very high risk of injury, are the supposed 1st amendment auditors. They are going to be killed by members of the public, not necessarily the police.
Dude pulled a gun on them! End of story
@@matjaquier7243 he didn't pull a gun he had a gun in his car that's different didn't mean he used it by the way
@@juliaweber212 read the article. One it doesn’t say rather he pulled it or not, so neither of us no if he did or didn’t, but it also says he had a holster on his body and the gun was on the floor board. Now I can tell you my gun doesn’t just jump out of its holster on its own, and no responsible gun owner stows their firearm on the floor. And cops don’t shoot if they see a holstered firearm. So it’s a fairly logical guess to say he pulled it on them.
It was a victimless crime.
Well he bet his life on it.
1:11 Somebody turned the "OY VEY!" up to 11.
ProTip: Everything she says, the SPLC is guilty of multiple times over.
It’s literally always them 👃
Israeli police training is the reason these zogbots are so dumb and trigger happy.
He pulled a gun on the police. Ive seen the video. He got what he deserved. His parents are sovereign idiots too.
I don't stand in solidarity with stupidity.
Cite the constitution, get told your not here for that, get called a sovereign citizen.
Cite the UCC, get told you are not using it in the proper context, get called a fraud and a sovereign citizen.
Cite the code of federal regulations, get told those are more like guidelines, get called a sovereign citizen.
Be a law abiding "citizen" and honest, get jailed and finances taken.
Retain a lawyer, become a ward of the court, get jailed and finances taken.
"Represent yourself", get ignored and dishonored, get called a sovereign citizen and jailed.
Cite supreme court cases that are before a certain date, get ignored, get jailed.
Ask for help with food, "we will help but you have to look for work and once you get a job we will remove the help, but we as the government won't help you if you don't labor.
When you work we will take a large portion of your income and give it back next year, if you don't let us have a portion we will take it or your property.
When you purchase anything that isn't food we the government say you will pay 6% extra because you are operating in commerce.
Cite corpus juris secundum, get told that it has no authority, get called a sovereign citizen.
Question jurisdiction get told they have proved jurisdiction without needing proof and that jurisdiction is provided by being appointed as an official (jurisdiction is supposed to be set by the prosecutor), get called a sovereign citizen.
Have your offspring taken illegally and unlawfully, get ignored in court, have your parental rights taken and given to adoption services, get arrested for kidnapping when you take your human offspring back, then get smeared and called a sovereign citizen.
THESE ACTIONS BY OFFICIALS PROVE THEY ARE LIEING AND CRIMINALS.
Allan was a jagoff doing a bit. He paid dearly for it. Every single sovereign citizen needs to learn the lesson.
Someone do a documentary on Sovereign citizen. The Govt obviously doesn't recognize these people, which is important if you they are going to commingle.
Bad form using SPLC on the same day members of that organization were accused of domestic terrorism.
Precisely!!! The SPLC is nothing more than a giant grift and Leftwing “community organizing” shield for their lies.
Those who claim to be sovereign have never been oath breakers.
No, most of them that claim to be sovereign are just law breakers.
@@B_raddidk I’d say most are following the law it clearly says any rights that are changed to licensed privileges should be ignored and if the right to travel doesn’t apply to automobiles the right to free speech shouldn’t apply only and the right to bear arms shouldn’t apply to cartridge ammunition firearms
@@zsweetxdreamzz8224we have never had the right to break laws that are constitutional when we drive an automobile on public roads.
Seems like he didn’t want to acknowledge being caught at his own game…So, claiming this “sovereign citizen” nonsense, yet he has a U.S. Passport??? Can’t have it both ways, and his foolish actions cost him his life.
So you condone this?
The killer cops👈, cost him his life....... get it right🤡
So.. what’s the difference between a sovereign citizen and an illegal immigrant?
Illegal immigrants claim to be the exact opposite. Supposedly they are proud and deserving US citizens.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣☠️
🎯🎯🎯👏👏👏
Sad his brainwashing ended this way..
Being a Sovereign citizen, American Moorish National or anything else you want to call yourself, makes no difference.
A better observation is to ask why has there been such a defiant rejection of establishment and government authority. I’d imagine this kid’s future was brighter than many of the places that you in the comments sit now. So why would he latch on to this? Could it be the circumstances we live in today? Weather that be the rise of the tea party and occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter or proud boys? The past 50 years of increasing corruption, inflating the USD, or the American dream becoming increasingly out of reach. Americans used to be the pinnacle of western culture. Now look at us… the lack of empathy or want to understand, what this kid or these people are frustrated about is alarming. It just goes to show you that we are rotting from the inside out. You people are sycophants and are part of the problem. Have an original thought, dont just be Boomer sheep lulled to sleep by Fox News, msnbc, or anyone for that matter. Don’t be lazy. Go find out before you make such definitive comment’s.
They just want to be freeloaders, that's it
If you go to another country, you are bound by their laws. Remove yourself physically from the USA if you are not part of it.
lol no
Yes. Ww have to follow laws so do you. What makes you think YOU are so special? You are NOBODY LIKE ME. losers only do this.
You’re ignorant of your rights.
"What does it mean to be a sovereign citizen in the US?"
Nothing. It means absolutely nothing.
Sovereign citizen is a trick you're either sovereign or you are a citizen, you cannot be both at the same time. A sovereign governs himself a citizen is governed by a government
A officer yelled the word "gun", but, was a gun found ?
It seems like a critical piece of information that should be made explicit in a news production such as this
There's literally no such thing as a sovereign citizen when you live in the country you claim not to be a part of.
There is no such thing as sovreign citizen. You're either sovereign or citizen
There's no such thing as an individual "Sovereign" in any country. If you want to be "Sovereign" you need to live in your own country. Probably not possible in this day and age.
Or an outlaw. By declaring themselves outside the law the make themselves outlaws. I recall Robin Hood didn't have a happy end either.
I prefer American national since a U.S citizen is an employee of a corporation 😂 but I do follow the laws I just disregard the laws against constitutional rights like it tells me to even says it’s my duty
"You will pay taxes or we end you"
"I don't believe in the US constitution and their laws do not apply to me, but according to the US constitution and their laws it is my right to..."
Bro, you kidding me?
If you area on land of that jurisdiction you are subject to the laws. If you don't like it you need to change the law or get out! You are benefiting from our roads, economy, protection, emergency healthcare yet they dont want to contribute!
What law did he break though seems like he was exercising his constitutional right of travel
I just dont understand the thought process behind all of this sovereign citizen stuff? Why do you think your better than everyone else and that the laws dont apply to you? Its extreme arrogance and disrespect to our system and the public.
Why are police pulling over people for no valid reason? I don't understand that thought process.
@@wraynephew6838 "no license plate on the car" learn to read please
@@nonamehere481 Not a valid reason there was no victim. It shouldn't be a crime.
thats not what it means.what it means is no victim no crime.statutes codes dont apply.laws still do
@@nonamehere481 kek
Guess he should have been raised better by his parents. He would be alive today. Sovereign haha
As kids, we might have all believed in unicorns for a short time, but then most of us grew up.
It means you want to turn any tiny incident into a 8ssue and get yourself thrown in jail for it.
Well now he's a sovereign citizen from the living
All the things (minus the license) she said... I dont pay for either. I'm broke 😂😂😂RIP to the young man
He can be sovereign, he can be a US Citizen, he can be Klingon he is and will always be subject to all the same laws as everyone else.
So if he caims sov citizen then would he be like an illegal alien? But aren't you beholden to the laws of whatever location your body is? Im trying to figdure this out but i feel the same way i felt when i looked into flat earth theory... its just not true...
@@BSpacc13 What's not true?
@@frankw7091 what they're believing. Claiming that the laws do not apply to them. Or that the earth is flat for the other group. Their claims just aren't true.
@@BSpacc13 That's what I thought, I just wanted conformation.
6 years or so ago I saw my first sovereign citizen video on youtube. I was thinking great, someone found a major loop hole when it comes to traffic laws. But being a smart individual, I checked out their claims.
It was clear to me that they cherry picked what they choose to believe, ignoring anything that disproves their beliefs. Sad people. I've been sparing with them ever since.
They don't like to pay taxes, but they want to be able to enjoy the roads that taxpayers have paid for? Make that one make sense. Great work officers!
Gas taxes and those who use the roads for compensation pay for them.
And, who is required to "pay" for use of public highways, as per: "The tax is placed upon those obtaining compensation for the use of the public highways." -In re Bush, 6 Cal.2d 43 [Crim. No. 3945. In Bank. April 1, 1936.] In the Matter of the Application of C.E.BUSH for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
It's actually true that road maintenance is financed by gas tax. So if a SovCit pays for gas and pays full price including tax, he IS financing the road with tax.
Not to defend SovCit idiots, but that one claim is true.
@@oliverl.9004 from what I've seen, most "sovcit's" are just aware that the US government is just a corporation and before their policies apply they must be holder-in-due-course of a valid contract or commercial agreement. The Clearfield doctrine...
"from what Ive seen" bro you're clearly a sov-s*it-head. You just dont want to get rekt in the comments
@@weytogomantruth but they fail in comprehending a birth certificate and ss card is a binding corporate contract for life and the constitution is null and void with the 14th amendment now you are subject to all company rules and regulations so you are not a freeman as mentioned in the constitution
i worked for an urban city in florida for 25yrs. this was complete preventable. that is not to say the officers will be charged.
the driver was not being cooperative at all, that is not a death penealy citation, though.
when, opening the door the the officer had fully body coverage of the suspect. the suspect could not move.
when another officer just happens to yell "gun, gun, gun" the officer that had physical custody of the suspect (covering his body and the drivers seat) retreated and ran away and then the execution firing squad occurred.
sad. i have been involved (investigated) dozens of these incidents. all the engaged officer had to do, was not let go of the suspect. if you have his hands, what is the suspect going to do?
notice on the bodyCam's all claiming who shot? like 2nd graders who can have the answer first. amazing.
yes and handcuff a critically, wounded suspect shot 8 times (one in the head and 7 in the chest) with the suspects hands behind his back as to restrict breathing and blood flow to his body. that was medically ingenuous move.
the suspect is shot eight times with his hands dangling above his head...what "threat" is someone that had been neutralized can be.
moral of the story:
i am an us citizen retired and for the past 2yrs i have lived in argintina.
no crime in my city, cops sit in the park and do nothing. saw 2 traffice stops in the years i hav been here and one was the drivers car broke down.
kudos to the retired military man protesting the suspects death...at least the military know "discipline"; not an executors firing squad because someone wanted to yell "gun" three times.
Best comment yet.
Agreed!!
So no crime in Argentina ? I am guessing you have never been to a Boca Juniors vs River Plate game. Plenty of illegal activities happening all over the stadium and spilling out onto the streets. Maybe the cops don't care. BTW its spelled Argentina. Considering you live there, you may want to know how its actually spelled.
He didn't declare he had a gun. It was heated. He was resisting. He switched hands for phone and was reaching towards the gun. Officers didn't have him secured, and even if they did he could break away and retrieve the weapon and shoot them. They were justified. Kid set up the situation in the worst possible ways. You are an ignorant if you believe there is no crime where you live in Argentina.
@@schmo7777yeah that was a problem he should told them he did and that he posed to harm to them
This is so sad how they trying to scare these people from getting free. This is sad.
Just trying to make sure people understand the laws ^^
Darwin award winner!!!
They speak of it as if sovereign citizens weren't a thing.
It's not. It's fairy tail world.
Another Darwin Award winner. Congratulations!
you take the covid vax?
@@xparanormalanon No vax for me for many reasons.
One whacko down... The story is completely wrong about people declaring themselves sovereign citizens. I can't remember the last time I heard somebody claim this moniker, though they continue to read from the same script. The term "sovereign citizen" has become such a joke that even sovtards will no longer claim it.
The guy got pulled over and he had a gun and he had no license plate on the vehicle ... he is clearly in violation ...
Violation of what exactly
I'm a sovereign citizen, laws don't apply to me. Did they teach you that in college?
thats not what it means thats just what the reporter said
Laws do apply just not ones in conflict with the constitution such as the right to travel by way of automobile jk the 14th amendment took all that away
I'm from the UK & therefore a Royal Subject. What exactly is a Sovereign Citizen?
Sadly, it took his life.
Shut up and pay your taxes
If you don't like the rules in the country you live in go live somewhere else.
Maybe because your American rules are ridiculous low speed limits for example I would just class them as a suggestion regardless one of the most corrupt countries in the world but you Americans are so dumbed down
@@Jack-qv2ljgo live in another country. Try north Korea
@@Jack-qv2ljRidiculous low speed limits? Are you crazy? They are there for a reason, you know? They are not suggestions, but enforced speed limits. Why do people hate driving safely??
He was following the rules disobedience to unconstitutional right to travel by automobile it literally tells you any right that is licensed to a privilege is null and void and should be ignored now if you aren’t traveling safely by automobile you are impeding others right to travel but it appears he forgot about the 14th amendment which makes all the other amendments null and void
I join I’m in Detroit . The police just wrongfully arrested me had me afraid for my life out of the blue. I’m so glad I survived and I’m so sorry we lost him. 🙏🏽🛐🧎🏽♀️🧘🏽♀️🫶🏽💜♾️ prayers up 🫂
Short story: It means nothing. Don't try to pull a gun on a cop.
He didn't pull the gun.
What’s the debate here? Officers were doing their job and giving lawful orders and the suspect was very uncorporative and PULLED A GUN. What other outcome can be expected?
None of the videos released show him grabbing a gun. Closest they have is he switched hands with his phone. But in that video you can clearly see the department edited it his right hand is on his left arm. Wake up
Obviously he did not pull his gun. But one of the police officers believed he pulled his gun. And the officers are trained for such situations. In such situations they have to eliminate the threat. Was it Chase Allan's own fault that he was fatally shot? Absolutely. Because he did not inform the police about his weapon. He did not comply at all.
@@michael-101 b's the policy enforcement officers, knew exactly who Chase Allen was, they knew who his family is and they where well aware of his and the families status. As the family had a case against the department in federal court. It was a targeted assassination of a federal witness.
@@terrybelden876Can you prove that? And do you want to deny that he had a gun?
One person here wrote: _"Cops can not afford to be second in a gun fight. If Chase had told the cops about the gun, he would still be alive today to fight his goofy sovereign citizen fight."_
@@michael-101 why would I deny he had a gun, it is a constitutionally protected right to be armed. Any code statute that deems that right illegal is null and void. Next he was not operating in commerce, the policy enforcers had no legitimate reason to even interact with him.
This is why being rebellious is dangerous, unless the officer is the one breaking the law.
Sovereign citizens ship is a silly idea. They need to move to another country if they don’t want to be apart of our laws.
You know who else were sovereign citizens?
The founding fathers.
You are not a smart one
Just be glad the founding fathers weren't African or muslim.
Hahahahahahaha!!!
Actually they were subjects of king George 3
The founding fathers LITERALLY wrote down a bunch of laws and rules on how to make laws that everyone has to follow, and called it the Constitution.
You are a citizen then you need to follow the law.
If the dude was black the whole country could be on fire
but he wasnt he was just an imbecile
eh id say any color just not a sovcit.
13% is a low chance
People don't understand what "sovereign" means. Sovereign literally means "above a ruler."
They don’t want you to be free
Since the 14th amendment we won’t ever be 😂 also made us employees thus taking away freeman status meaning the previous 13 amendments are basically null and void
Looks like 1 dude standing up against 5 bullies.
That 1 dude reached for a gun while committing multiple crimes.
@@Matein13 right, so 5-1 should be able to disarm with no shots ever being fired. Is it usually this hard for you to think?
Reilly maybe you don’t know it’s not about fair fights 😂 once there’s a deadly force it’s then the cops hands to eliminate the deadly threat as soon as possible.
@@Gangai263 😂😂you thought that kid was a deadly force? Gun was prob fake, unloaded, or planted later by the police. I mean you’re a complete joke siding with authority who are sellouts to humanity. Why don’t you start using your brain, look around and realize the bigger picture as to what’s going on. You’re a small minded simpleton so I doubt you can critically think.
He is now eternally sovereign......inside of a casket 💀
AINTNOWAY
Sick
He said he was INDEPENDENT of the law, and his parents don't think it's a problem? What kind of parents are they?
"The United States of America Inc." Inc means INCORPORATED, and is a foreign corporation, providing governmental services to the people. Let it be known that they went through their third and final bankruptcy a few years ago, but don't take my word for it, look it up. The problem is they are subjecting the american people to foreign laws, that is not the law of this American land. The law of this land is the Public Law. Statutes and codes are different they apply to the their Corporation, and their employees, and or agents, and or officers, like company policy. But they have coerced the people by threat of armed force, and the color of law, that violations, like traffick infractions, are crimes. They have used it to generate revenue, but in truth they are committing crimes against the people that are unlawful. And they are doing it by force or threat of force.
You all need to ask yourself, Why do police officers give their oath, they are sworn into a position of power, and then pretend that oath was never given. Most of them don't seem to know their oath, or care that they agreed to it.
Give it a rest man. It wasn't convincing when Allan was spewing this garbage, and it's not convincing from you.
@Diana Sharp: No, the United States is not a corporation. If you contend that it is, prove it with verifiable, credible evidence.
idiot
100% correct Diana
@@bubbalove5663 another idiot
If you dont like the laws leave. I follow the., so do you. Get out. If i have yo pay my insurance so do you.
So I can become a woman but I can't be a sovereign citizen?
😂😂😂😊
As long as you follow the laws, you can be whatever you want.
You can even become a sovereign citizen woman as long as you don't violate the law.
This is a very peculiar movement, I'm sure they don't have them in Russia.
They shouldn’t be anywhere but the United States as there would be no basis such as the constitutional amendments such as the right to travel and legally driving isn’t traveling but operation of a motor vehicle so the right doesn’t apply legally and neither do any other amendments since the 14th made us all employees of the U.S and removed our freeman status
00:14: Allen's "alleged" claims. Come on fox13, you can do better.
Its sad to see so many people that are uneducated in their rights and so willing to speak on subjects that they have no accurate knowledge of.
Sovereign Citizen is an oxymoron. Nice hit piece.
The term "sovereign citizen" was created by the SovCits themselves. That's how they originally referred to themselves. Once the term acquired a stigma, they no longer wished to be associated with it and began calling themselves other things. That's when it became fashionable among SovCits to complain about the name, as you are doing. However, the name had already stuck. Like it or not, that's now the official term to describe people with your ideology.
not just oxymorons, actual full on morons too
When you run out of things to rebel against
If they detach from our laws then they can leave our lands. This is America and as an American Citizen you will obey our laws.
Does the indigenous population have to leave too?
@@conormcmenemie5126 was he indigenous? He was just a regular guy refusing to obey laws.
Was there a gun in his vehicle?