ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
- The conspiracy theory that powerful government insiders are involved in child trafficking is having consequences. Disgruntled parents say that social workers are agents of a deep state, plotting to kidnap their children. They're being encouraged by a fake Navy SEAL who says that "sovereign" individuals don't have to follow laws.
Subscribe to VICE News here: bit.ly/Subscrib...
Check out VICE News for more: vicenews.com
Follow VICE News here:
Facebook: / vicenews
Twitter: / vicenews
Tumblr: / vicenews
Instagram: / vicenews
More videos from the VICE network: www. vic...
#VICENews #News
![🎤 จับฉลากร้องเพลง x P’ #XXSIVK [EP.1] (2/2) เพื่อนจับได้คำไหน..ต้องร้องคำนั้น เริ่ม! 💓🎶 #MXFRUIT](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1bJvMJXmeS4/mqdefault.jpg)
“I didn’t know she was 14”
Chris Hansen would like you to take a seat.
"Well then why do you have wine coolers and a Kinder egg sir?"
@@captainspaulding5963 😂
@@rizzorizzo2311 I really miss watching To Catch A Predator, the way Chris humiliates people is absolute gold!
@@captainspaulding5963 what's crazy is the ones that think they'll just walk away after the chat, bonkers
That should have been obvious a 17 or 18 year can be more believable
We direly need to teach “Critical Thinking & Rational Skepticism”, “Financial Literacy & Wealth Development ”, and “Practical Ethics & Citizenship” as required courses in all high schools.
The common sense basics
@Northan Green like...taxes?
US society needs to STOP *pandering/encouraging* the *_PROUDLY MORONIC_* ... from _schools to TV shows to Hollywood movies to electing the POTUS / politicians_
@@nomdeplore7604 no he meant Texas, lolz
you know what the reaction will be right? "You can't teach our kids you commie values!" "Ethics should be taught at home!" "Critical thinking is Marxism"
"I committed a crime and I don't like the consequences so I'm not gonna be a citizen anymore kthxbye"
"i ThOuGhT sHe WaS eIgHtEeN!¡1"
So is it your opinion that when someone “commits a crime”, (despite repaying their debt to Society) they should forever walk around with a scarlet letter afixed to their chest and continue to be treated like a criminal?
Right. Work hard to resolve your legal troubles, and get psychological help. And if you are successful, only then think about having a family.
@@Adrian_Estando Huh??
@@TheRTM where did you read those words in this comment....oh you're one of those who like to try to have a different convo than the one being had because you know they have a valid point.
When the blonde woman said she wondered if they were high or mentally ill, I laughed. Lady, I'm both, and I know this movement is beyond messed up.
To be fair, she forgot to mention incredibly stupid. Which if we're being honest with each other, fits the q tips to a t.
You are mentally ill. Yes. Vaxtard.
Yeah you are mentally ill! Good job for recognizing it
@@athfcoz 😢hey look it’s a test subject with a “birth certificate”
Ha Ha! Too funny! You hit the nail on the head.
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." - Professor Stephen Hawking
For any entity of government to think they can have authority to take some ones child away is dangerous to begin with,
its a necessity though. Some parents smoke crack and have zero sense of responsibility.
but the love for their children wont be different, when strangers come to take your child, even if you smoke crack..
it might be best for the child but its hard to pass judgment to the parent for fighitng it.
Ironically what proves your point further is the fact Stephen Hawking never even said that
@@Captain__Obvious well gee thanks for the buzz kill, Captain Obvious
@@getthegoods420 News Flash kids: Between the numerous pedo's and the lack of lifting an actual finger for refugees, y'all lost the kids angle.
NEXT!
@@Captain__Obvious You are wrong. S. Hawking was right.
This sounds like a really great way to enable abusive parents. "Parents have a right to their children" even if they violate their children's rights to safety?
Exactly my thoughts as well. Some people out there are not able to bring up children in a stable home. Many live in extreme poverty or the parents are drug addicts and children being sexual, emotionally, physically and psychologically abused. The ex Navy seal who is a "sovereign citizen" had sexual relations with a minor who was 14 years old but somehow did not know. Some of these people just want to live doing what they want. Even if it is toxic or chaotic to society on the whole.
Well, yeah. Why do you think so many of them are in trouble with CPS in the first place? The one that trump pardoned was known for removing his kid's skin with steel wool, and he was not even considered an exterme case.
its already illegal to abuse children or force them into (actual, not imagined) dangerous conditions. you didnt make a valid argument against ""Parents have a right to their children" - which they do unless you can demonstrate an objectively measurable harm, not just because you dont like the opinions of the parents.
What right to safety?
Where is it on the constitution or the Universal declaration of human rights?
What’s a trip is that they’re supposed to be about “saving the children” but their children were taken from them. How that work?? I’ve been saying that QAnon is guilt-based projection.
Bro can’t discern if a girl appears underaged and thinks he has the critical thinking skills to represent himself in court…
Actually, they acted in my country
Military
I'm jewish
So... yeah, white supremacists
@@alinebaruchi1936 English isn’t your first language right?
@@RJ-mh3ox nope. Though I treat you all as if you were 9-12. It's just as much as your emotional limitations go. Kids
@@RJ-mh3ox criminals know exactly what they are doing.
They got money to do it
Virginia has a thing about gun laws for whites
They will never allow it for black people
Seriously...
I lived in an abusive home. Even at a time when court authorized removal of children from parents was rare, it would have been welcome relief.
My brother is one of these crazies. He’s diagnosed Bipolar, but he’s also one that claims that he’s his own government. He doesn’t have custody of any of his four children, nor should he. He’s very emotionally abusive towards them. His ex-wife has two of them, and my parents literally just went to go pick up my newborn nephew from the hospital yesterday. It’s sad.
Very frustrating and disheartening....blessings and strength to ur family .
Good luck to all
I know your not intending to but please don’t generalize people with bipolar disorder in the same category as these people. A Bipolar diagnosis has zero to do with participating in this kind of behavior. I have Schizoaffective Bipolar type and I as well as several others I know are the people you would have to work the absolute hardest to convince of any of this conspiracy mumbo jumbo. We’ve been delusional, we’ve experienced psychosis, we know not to fall for everything we hear on a YT video. We are extremely cautious of what and who we believe because of our diagnosis. We are absolutely going to check credentials and question people’s credibility. Our delusions stemmed from something very real (to us) that happened inside our brains.
The stigma surrounding my disorder in particular is one that makes people question my ability to raise my daughter. Despite me having full custody of her, never losing custody of her and the fact that I’m probably an overly cautious parent.
Most of these “sovereign citizens” don’t have diagnosable conditions. You can treat a brain disease, you can treat a mental illness. You can’t treat alt right Q conspiracy nut syndrome because it’s a flaw in their actual belief system and a lack of critical thinking skills that make them susceptible to misinformation campaigns that know how to target the right people. There’s no medication that is going to bring these people back to reality because they are not sick. They are mostly uneducated and easily influenced.
Is he any better when medicated? I hope the best for those children.
@@89visionartistry89 Exactly! Some of the best parents I know have treated Bi Polar disorder.
What was holding these lunatics back was distance. Then social networks came along and we all got screwed. They're highly organized, motivated, armed, and stupid. That's a hell of a mix.
Yup, a bomb waiting to be dropped on those of us who dare to be sane.
Maybe just loosely organized. Being stupid and being highly organized should be mutually exclusive
That's why being highly informed, motivated to provide for personal safety from morons, armed, and intelligent is plan B. Plan A is to avoid conflict and support strong leaders that don't have a favorite color of spray paint to Huff out of a bag.
That is funny because the Liberal Whites were the crazy ones back in the 60s and Conservative Whites were the normal ones. Over time that has flipped in Western society.
@@guardianoffire8814 ahhhh, yes. It was so crazy to oppose a system with a draft and an unjust war, as well as 2-tiers of citizenship... one for white men, one for everyone else.
Madness!
He doesn’t even know what parentheses and brackets mean in a document, but thinks he can handle representing himself in court. He’s going to lose.
It's genuinely bizarre. If it's on the page it's part of the document. The only question which remains is whether it should be part of the document. In a legal filing ideally the document should only contain material relevant to the case. Intentionally putting something in there which you believe others should see as distinct from the rest of the text in some meaningful way but should really recognise was only meaningful to you,..... Well, it provides an indication that someone doesn't know how things work and nevertheless insists on believing that the world should bend to conform to their needs.
These people are often influenced by the evangelical movement even if it's at second or third hand, and I guess they're accustomed to there being marginal commentaries which supplement the text in religious tracts . Maybe that's where this idiosyncratic preparation of his filing ultimately derived from.
The state wants to remove a child from him. Those are the stakes for him in the situation. Other statutory rapists have gone on to live relatively normal lives, it happens all the time. I'm inclined to believe that he's just poorly resourced in terms his ability to think about how how he might congruously respond to his situation, in order to secure a better outcome for himself. He's maladaptive.
Good. The longer he thinks he's the smartest man in the room, the longer his kid stays out of his hands.
@@ICantThinkOfANameB Idk about that.
I think his crime could have truly been an innocent mistake.
Having your life essentially ruined over something like that could push someone into a pretty desperate mindset & leave them vulnerable to fringe ideology so long as it provides some semblance of hope.
I don't think we should just automatically assume him a horrible person.
The judge will loose a LOT too, if he keeps aiding kidnappers
The lawyer who chooses to represent himself has a fool for a client.
Sovereign citizen is an oxymoron. You can’t be sovereign and a citizen.
You know what also is an oxymoron? Jumbo Shrimp. Yet they exists.
You're telling me at 21 you can't tell the difference between an 18 year and old a 14 year old child... It's really tough for me to give this guy the benefit of the doubt on that; especially with him having pled guilty and agreed to the terms of parole. Yikes. Sounds like he made his bed and is crying about having to sleep in it.
@@JJSmalls pedophiles shouldnt have kids
well idk if and how many girls u saw in ur life, but it can happen that a 18 year old looks like 14 and a 14 year old looks like 18. especially with make up etc. i dont say it was like that in his case, but its just possible. there are websites where u see pictures and have to guess the age of the person, and wow crazy, often people dont guess it right, and many meme situations was created out of someone showing interest in a girl from a picture, then google the age and realize that she is underage.
@@mjbakermd414 why?
I had someone guess I was 17 when I was more than twice that age. I’ve seen 14 year olds that look 25 and 25 year olds that look 40. It’s bound to happen with almost eight billion people in the world.
@@dylliedutch you had someone incorrectly guess your age, not the same as someone sleeping with you when you were a minor child.
“Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”
― George Carlin
He was obviously in the less stupid half with his “stupider”
And that what scares me!
@@x7ripper666 "stupider" has been in use as a superlative since the 1800s, and though "stupidest" is more frequently used Merriam Webster recognizes both of them.
One of my heroes!
They take it as a challenge, to prove how much smarter they are.. it never ends well, for them..
"If I did everything I was supposed to do on my criminal probation, I could not be a functioning citizen"
That is probably the most true thing he said. We really need to revamp out criminal justice system to be a criminal rehab system.
And all it took was a whining man baby who can't keep it in his pants and doesn't understand what "a society" is for you to come to that conclusion. Oh, also because he's white, so you can relate.
@@dionysusNME I did say "the only" true thing he said. I'm suggesting that he got absolutely fucked up by our criminal justice system, or at least passed on an opportunity to receive mental health care.
The dude's insane.
And no, that was how I felt beforehand. I just think it's important to understand that there are always fundamentally true observables, but some people interpret them wrong. That's the basis for conservative ideology.
You don't have a right to rehabilitation. Of course, we don't have a right to pure vengeance either, which seems to be what our "justice" system is mostly focused on. But neither of these options -- typically presented as the ONLY options -- are legitimate IMO. (I find that when things are often presented as only two sides, the best answer is usually the one nobody will tell you about.)
Prison is legitimate only as an extension of the right to self-defense. So execution is never acceptable for example -- if someone is shooting at you, go ahead and shoot back, but once they're in cuffs that ain't defense, it's murder. Likewise, locking people up is only justified if you have reason to believe they are an imminent threat. And you can only legitimately restrict them enough to negate that threat.
The question then becomes...if someone has used the internet to find kids to molest, how do you restrict that access enough to prevent them from doing that again, but not so much that they can't apply for jobs? As a software engineer, I can't really figure out an answer, except maybe supervised usage...or a psychologist signing off that they're "rehabilitated" maybe (I don't *oppose* rehabilitation, I just recognize it's not always possible/practical)
It looks like a probation program that's intentionally impossible to comply with, and it's lifetime. Not allowed to be in a room with a minor? You go to the restroom, a child walks in a few seconds later, instant violation. It's nothing but an excuse that the local law enforcement can use to declare "We got another child-rapists off the streets! We protect children, give us more money."
@@Urza9814 I would argue that access to rehabilitation is not a right but a greater good kind of situation. We don't HAVE to pay for parks or city programs but our society does because we believe in doing things to help the community. We should work on developing better integration for ex cons because it betters everyone's outcomes on less crime and criminal repeat offenders.
Specifically for Pedo's, I cannot imagine we could not come up with a VPN kind of situation that controls for that part of the web. Add in random computer checks and you would be good.
The issue with this whole particular case is that police over utilize plea deals because it saves money and time on the judicial side and they pressure people into it. THATS what needs to be reformed.
I was a victim advocate and EMT/paramedic in Arizona for many years. I worked alongside CPS (and whatever they're calling it now, after the Republicans "cleaned it up" following the Ame Deal case and only managed to make a bigger mess of it) during that entire time. If they were selling children, they found ways to hide it that I cannot divine, because Arizona's foster care system is constantly overloaded with children.
Sellers don't seem to be finding buyers.....
So you admit you engaged in child trafficking and are guilty of felony crimes under Title 18 U.S.C. section 241,242, Title 5 U.S.C. section 7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection 5.
Thats bc you dont know how it works.
The irony is they don’t realize how free they are to be insane lmao.
Me : There's enough wrong with the child welfare system that maybe these people aren't insane.
Me : These people are insane.
Me : He's a sex offender. If they make him not a citizen, doesn't that mean that he gets deported or sent to a holding facility?
I blane the media. For decades they fed the public the idea that they could decide what's real or not, which then mutated into a reverse Ockham's Razor, where they *always* opt for the most insanely convoluted (but entertaining) answers
@Michael Lozano My comment was on the wrong side of history.
A child should not be placed in foster care without evidence of abuse.
his not free his registered sex offender.. his like kane marked for the rest of his life
Yep. Try to take away my insanity, get cut.
Dude went from “I’m gonna sue all these people and get my kids back” to “time to leave the country” real quick
Russia is waiting for Tim-may!! And others like him....
@@Hooks2013 Afganistan could be a good place for him to take out his wrath on big, bad America!
It’s heavily edited . He said all that in one sitting
It was pretty messed up that they took his child.
No, you have no idea what you're talking about. Vice media is making up lies. Our government is corrupt. Wake up. This is our Story Annie Nicole Hastings. This minor committed multiple felonies against other males and was arrested for her crimes. The mother allowed this to go on. Be careful who you believe. The government is very corrupt. Think before you judge.
◇ Propaganda ◇ is what's really going on. For those who are truly evil and know the truth, they know this so they will make up lies about the good to make themselves feel like their winning and hope they can destroy the good. And they will do pretty much anything to destroy the light because those who are the light shine too bright. And others who are the light too can see through the darkness and all the evils lies. The darkness hates the light, so shine brighter. ✨ Remember Love Conquers ALL. United we rise, divided we fall. America don't let this corruption destroy us. They want us divided. We must ALL come together and unite as one ✨ Real love, doesn't hurt, only fake love does. Amen 🙏🏼 God bless America all humanity. Amen 🙏🏼
I am finally gonna speak. Here's what I've been keeping inside about what I've done to expose over corrupt government. Listen. I've stood by my innocence husband we have seen how corrupt our system is, CPS how they lie about parents, stealing these children and it's goes so deep. This is there divide and conquer from within. Next I see the system they put millions in prison and on lifetime probation and abuse them. This is beyond cruel. I am pregnant and they want our baby. Once your in their system as a child CPS your their so-called property and your children are theirs to take. They caught me at the hospital and kiddnap me Aug 23 and I ran out of the hospital to the lobby, the security guard threw me on the ground and I begged for help. Someone in the lobby recorded this. It was at Dignity hospital in Henderson Nevada I hope someone finds this. The staff I heard them say that post went viral, take it down. They keep the evidence kept secret and lie about it. They took my phone, before they took it I recorded the hospital no one was sick only people they were keeping hostage lots of them. This is NOT A joke!!! Some where keep in these beds for days. Only allowed to get up to go to the bathroom. They use codes I instead of names so we the people in the hospital hopefully don't know, they give you shots and you have no idea what's inside and you feel weird. I texted my family to tell them where I was. Thank God. They took my in an ambulance next across the street and thank God someone gave me my phone I only had it less than 2 minutes I text my family as fast as i could telling them where i was a too save my dog who was home alone. No one cared about my dog in the hospital or the mental hospital. When I was in there I saw so many of the kindest human beings who have been tormented by our government and want to stop their corruption. Do you understand what I'm saying... EVER WONDER where people go who disappear.... I almost disappeared. I only got out because of one individual who gave me my phone so i could text my family. And I could only get out if he came to puck me up.
I fought and fought. I fought for my husband when they sent bounty hunters after him I recorded them. I got assaulted because of it. We record these corrupt liars through videos and audio and we recird our phone calls. Now my husband is in jail and they are trying to keep him in there. He never committed a crime, they lied and coerced him almost 20 years ago in a plea bargain. We found out this is what they do to millions of innocent people. Fear, they get us with fear. Here's our documentary. Stop believing their lies. Come together black, white, orange, red, brown I don't care what color you are. We all matter. United we rise, divided we fall. They want us to live in fear and take everything. Manipulating us, controlling us with fear through media, greed, race, politics, now this vaccine. Find the truth, they try to hide it but it's out there.
m.facebook.com/groups/326437798619384/permalink/449818489614647/
Kidnapped video bounty hunters m.facebook.com/groups/326437798619384/permalink/449911076272055/
Hospital Kidnapped video
facebook.com/groups/326437798619384/permalink/449908036272359/
So a guy got fed up with a lifetime probation that he agreed to so he’s doing mental gymnastics to try to get out of it????
"I am very capable of representing myself." A good way to lose a court case, lol.
I'm in the middle of representing myself (not by choice) in a civil suit and if I wasn't fortunate enough to have two retired lawyers in the family, I would not have even figured out how to file. 100% accurate statement.
@@nate6045 yes it’s very difficult but sometimes necessary to represent yourself since civil court doesn’t offer free legal counsel. I think legal counsel should be taxpayer funded for child custody cases
For +-85% of Americans
Even lawyers use lawyers.
@@LawnMowerFan I'm representing myself because I was assaulted by my local PD after a possible 4th amendment violation. No lawyer would take the case on contingency and the lawyers that would were too far away so they declined just based on geography. I do find the whole process interesting and exciting because I finally feel like I'm on the road to proper justice but honestly I hate that they'll have the upper hand because the ball really is in their court solely because I have no experience here.
In this, I really do empathize with a lot of these people. The government really doesn't work in our favor. That said, these guys really don't understand how government should work at all.
Why is he going after the judge like that, he’ll never see his daughter again?!
“He has a Q-Anon mentor”
ooohhh.
28 U.S. Code § 454. Practice of law by justices and judges
Any justice or judge appointed under the authority of the United States who engages in the practice of law is guilty of a high misdemeanor.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 908.)
“The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State.”
(Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239)
“The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!”
(Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)
Ironic the topic of protecting their children is discussed, when the literal predator is among them.
It’s delusional to think that child services is a cover for child trafficking. And are they trying to say that children shouldn’t be taken away from pedafiles, child beaters, and parents or guardians that neglect them?
@@10640404 Maybe you should look into what this country has done to native american children for 2 centuries.
Moral of the story?
Don't have kids.
Seriously. It's not like I needed this piece to convince me of that.
But jesus christ...humans just lose ALL semblance of reality when kids are involved. All sides, on all issues. I don't get the big deal to be honest. Kids are....fine, I guess. But most human adults act like children are the most precious holy divine entity that could possibly exist in three dimensional reality.
I mean...it's just a small human that smells weird and has poor conversation skills. What's the big deal?
Am I oversimplifying it? Yes.
But not that much....
@@seandavidr Maybe you should stop living in the past?
@@avedic There is no future for the human race without kids you know.
As someone who was on probation for a year I can emphasize with this guy; if I had lifelong probation I'd abscond too. You can't lead a normal life with all the restrictions probation causes. He should've took some jail time and registered instead of lifelong probation.
Your last line is his best advice.
@@pennyvisco5186 except pedophiles aren't known to fare well in prison (thank God.)
His lawyer was terrible. Who the hell takes lifetime probation? That's crazy. He says he's innocent. So _why_ plead guilty? Bad legal advice is probably why.
@@Katiepants009 girl was supposedly 14. Thats illegal but it ain't pedophilia. My great grandmother got married at 15. Most of us have ancestors that were that young. We're our great great grandpas pedos?
Im sorry are you suggesting we should feel sorry for pedophiles?
Nah. Woodchippers are what they need.
He's "very capable of representing himself", yet he didn't have enough sense to know he was impregnating a 14-year-old.
who'd he impregnate?
@@kcbh24 He impregnated his wife, who was clearly not 14.
@@maryann2970 she isnt 14 NOW!
You don't have enough sense to know that 2003 is not 2021. The guy was 21 when that happened. He's pushing 40 now.
Man he slept with her but honestly he could've thought she was 16 and thats an honest mistake man
These poor reporters must feel like they’re losing brain cells after talking to these people
It’s vice they have brain dead anyways…
@@Skabanis They have that!? Lol
“The idea prevails with some indeed, it found expression in arguments at the bar that we have in this country substantially or practically two national governments; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to exercise.”
“I take leave to say that if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will be the result. We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism.”
“It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside of the supreme law of the land finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the constitution.” - Downes vs Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)
The “United States” corporation is defined as a foreign entity
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, testimony before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, 1911. (102) “Behind the visible government there is an invisible government upon the throne that owes the people no loyalty and recognizes no responsibility. To destroy this invisible government, to undo the ungodly union between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the task of a statesman
"Pedo now regrets terms, turns to Qanon for help."
Exactly!!!
Yes
lolololol
Isn't that the recruiting slogan for Qanon??
What he did in no way justifies the government making it illegal to be around his own baby.
People unfortunately don't want to do their research and read the laws, if anyone tells you that they're a sovereign citizen run, because they know nothing.
"I can't take responsibility for my actions, therefore I'm going to blame others and run from my responsibilities"
like all good americans
This is what happens when you de-value expertise and think you know as much as people who have been trained as professionals, and you end up thinking that practicing law is like a modern from of witchcraft where if you say the right word-incantations then the judge sets you free due to your magical spell power, your skill check, and the judge failing their saving throw.
What a great way of putting it
Well said. And they all think they're chaotic-neutral half-orc Paladins, except they're really NPCs.
"In democracy, my ignorance is as good as your knowledge" - Isaac Asimov
Anti-intellectualism has become rampant in the USA.
When debating people like this, they dismiss your facts and studies because they believe that all the institutions are an evil cabal. It's a very effective way to brain wash people.
You'll be surprised what laws allow witchcraft of every sort.its all legal in new zealand
I was once young enough to buy into Sovereign Citizens and then I woke up. It didn't take long, I've survived being raised a Jehovah's Witness; my critical thinking has become sharper over the years with many lessons through failure and loss.
Be skeptical, ask questions and employ empathy...it goes a long way.
❤️
I never bought into the sovereign citizen thing but I was captivated by the idea that the right knowledge and rhetoric could protect one from abusive law enforcement. Fortunately this knowledge and rhetoric does in fact exist, however it's not the sovereign citizens that possess and wield it. It's the cop watchers and amendment auditors that do.
tHe forEign threat is here. Call them what y0u will, but you will find them, to your right, where they work to destr0y, your rights. For3ign intelligence bou9ht their way into our p0itics. Psychological Ops affect your interest in media and trends. It helps the @190r!thyM d3t3rmine your age and value to the doll$r, the better you dan$e, the longer you live.
@@0O0OO0 Who's "they", nutcase?
So, you actually accept that truth that you do not own yourself then?
@@garolstipock you'd have to define many terms to make your comment even remotely coherent including "own" and "self " or "yourself." But no, I do not "own" myself. The molecules that compose my body have existed for billions of years before my "self" had laid claim to them. And they'll return to the Earth and universe for an eternity when I'm done with them. The very short time that they occupy my body is barely a blip on the radar relative to the eternities that are the lifetime of the universe. If anything you are "borrowing" your "self" from the universe and will return it when you're done lol
We have a huge mental health crisis in this country and I see exploding every single day and it’s just gonna get worse
So this legally unqualified person thinks he can out lawyer a judge.
Dunning and Kruger would be proud
Lol
This is a litmus test guys. SMH. The idiocy of people.
28 U.S. Code § 454. Practice of law by justices and judges
Any justice or judge appointed under the authority of the United States who engages in the practice of law is guilty of a high misdemeanor.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 908.)
Title 18 -241. Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
IF TWO OR MORE PERSONS GO IN DISGUISE ON THE HIGHWAY,
or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured-
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696 ; Pub. L. 90-284, title I, §103(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75 ; Pub. L. 100-690, title VII, §7018(a), (b)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396 ; Pub. L. 103-322, title VI, §60006(a), title XXXII, §§320103(a), 320201(a), title XXXIII, §330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970 , 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104-294, title VI, §§604(b)(14)(A), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507 , 3511.)
Title 18- 242. Deprivation of rights UNDER COLOR OF LAW
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696 ; Pub. L. 90-284, title I, §103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75 ; Pub. L. 100-690, title VII, §7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396 ; Pub. L. 103-322, title VI, §60006(b), title XXXII, §§320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, §330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970 , 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104-294, title VI, §§604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507 , 3511.)
The color of law is defined as any authority using his or her power to willfully deprive a person of his or her rights and privileges protected by the U.S. Constitution. It is designed to protect individuals of their rights. Authority figures including police officers, judges, security guards, mayors, city council members, members of Congress must abide by the color of law. Those who break it are charged with a federal crime.
That’s only a drop in the bucket
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is indeed, quite true, that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration the responsibility is purely political, no appeal except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts Bill of Rights, the government of the commonwealth “may be a government of laws and not of men.” For, the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.” [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)]
Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government …. Constitution for the United States of America, Article 4, Section 4
Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.
“In Europe, the executive is almost synonymous with the sovereign power of a State; and generally includes legislative and judicial authority. … Such is the condition of power in that quarter of the world, where it is too commonly acquired by force or fraud, or both, and seldom by compact [consent]. In America, however, the case is widely different. Our government is founded upon compact [consent]. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people.” Glass v. The Sloop Betsey, 3 Dall 6 (1794)
“In the United States***, sovereignty resides in the people who act through the organs established by the Constitution. The Congress as the instrumentality of sovereignty is endowed with certain powers to be exerted on behalf of the people in the manner and with the effect the Constitution ordains. The Congress cannot invoke the sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared.” Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330, 353 (1935)
@@MrDrocballer I don’t follow most of what you’re trying to say with your copy and pastes here, but there’s a section in the first one that says sexual abusers can be put away for life. So… idgi
“I’m gonna sue everyone because I was held accountable for sleeping with a 14 year old”
Way to take some personal responsibility buddy.
@@ronarmstrong835 it has absolutely NOTHING to do with how physically different a 14 year old is from an 18 year old. It has to do with brain development and the ability to consent - ESPECIALLY when the other person is considerably older and therefore automatically in a position of authority over them.
You don’t get to claim to want to “protect the children” and rail on against pedos and traffickers while simultaneously defending them. Just stop talking. You’re disgusting.
Better: because I pleaded guilty to sleeping with a 14 yo
Yep, you got it.
I would think that now that he has a daughter the thought of an adult sleeping with her being barely a teenager would make him understand, but I guess that point totally missed him
America's constitution and legal system is only for the rich and powerful.
Notice how they always plead the Fifth in court. But when you and I do it, the judge threatens to throw us in prison until we speak up.
John Coleman, Eustace Mullins, G Edward Griffin, David Icke, Bill Cooper and many others have been trying to wake up people since the 90#.
Sheeple fast asleep. The real enemy is in Washington DC, not Moscow or Beijing.
What a shanda.
This started disturbing and ended extreemly horrifically disturbing.
I agree, not sure if for the same reasons. I think the whole country has gone extreme, be it right or left.
Like a rolercoaster that only goes down
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is indeed, quite true, that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration the responsibility is purely political, no appeal except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts Bill of Rights, the government of the commonwealth “may be a government of laws and not of men.” For, the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.” [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)]
Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government …. Constitution for the United States of America, Article 4, Section 4
Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.
“In Europe, the executive is almost synonymous with the sovereign power of a State; and generally includes legislative and judicial authority. … Such is the condition of power in that quarter of the world, where it is too commonly acquired by force or fraud, or both, and seldom by compact [consent]. In America, however, the case is widely different. Our government is founded upon compact [consent]. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people.” Glass v. The Sloop Betsey, 3 Dall 6 (1794)
“In the United States***, sovereignty resides in the people who act through the organs established by the Constitution. The Congress as the instrumentality of sovereignty is endowed with certain powers to be exerted on behalf of the people in the manner and with the effect the Constitution ordains. The Congress cannot invoke the sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared.” Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330, 353 (1935)
Yeah ..the government has been up to no good for a long time.
@@brianzell99 the government ended up protecting a child from a pedophile.
What's scary is that this documentary is prominently featuring some reasonably smart people who were taken in in a moment of crisis and fell for a malignant and delusional scammer, and predictably tragedy ensued.
He's a sex offender. He refuses to abide by guidelines put in place to ensure he doesn't pose an ongoing risk to children. He thinks he has a right to have access to his child--but his child has rights too.
The child's a citizen and has a right to be protected by the government entity that abides over her.
it's his kid, he's not a baby fucker he was a 21 year old moron that slept with a teen. Do you think stripping him of his rights in this way is anywhere near a realistic punishment?
@@tilleryinnovations592 my X went through that system, these morons have no idea how awful it is.
@@tombirmingham7033 honestly the probation should have been in place for like 10 years not the rest of his life
@@tombirmingham7033 Why did you leave out the fact that this guy negated every chance to get rehabilitated,knocked up a 14 year old and is seeking help from a guy who thinks that cps is a satanic cover for child abuse ?
The irony of asking a "sovereign" citizen who they voted for..
A sovereign knows voting is futile…..
In this day and age
@Shane Gallagher because they think they can change a corrupt system by using the means given.
Trump is a Jesuit, a pacifier for the people.
@Shane Gallagher what makes you think every sovereign is a trump supporter or every trump supporter is a sovereign?
@Shane Gallagher the reason for the civil war was not “slavery” alone, but that makes a good history lesson. The industrial north racked up a lot of debt and was forcing the agricultural south to pay it.
The 13th amendment abolished slavery, the 14th amendment created a new type of slavery
@Shane Gallagher not every southern flying that flag owned slaves or were racist. There were plenty of northerners that owned slaves and were racist
The child protective services are definitely deeply flawed though. So many children experience abuse in foster care homes, or are taken from their families when they shouldn't be. Destroyed my own family when I was a child.
Every instance of a child being taken from a home that I ever heard about was legit. Every case had drugs or other criminal activity involved. For all you idiots that think it was unfair your kid got taken away because you were caught doing a little heroine or meth, think again!
You can't say that statement loud enough!
After my investigations..I have found most of these alphabet agencys for children have working people that don't even have their own children.
The ones that do ... do not associate with their children in public. So that even looks abusive towards her children.
I know why they do it but...I don't think that is the answer.
A lot of abusive crap goes on because school says teach your children and the parents say we cant...both parents are working 50 hours a week and are to exhausted so...child r not raise themselves...sometimes this is where drugs come in.
It's all working just as the government wants it to.
I'm very saddened but yang know MA NY other people see how it all works.
Who will stand up against it all and not lose everything you have?
the unfortunate thing is, is that the opportunity came for CPS after the destruction of the family unit.
Research
Nancy Schaefer,
Senator Nancy Schaefer of Georgia:
"CPS main function is Child trafficking..."
From her congressional investigation. Then her and her elderly husband both found dead called "murder/suicide" DOUBTFUL. THEN LOOK AT ARKANSAS, and their murdered congressional rep...ties heavily
@@christking8844 It's the aliens commanded by Bigfoot. They're at the center of it all.
He is welcome to leave. I don't want him here. Especially if he has sex with a 14 year old girl, has no remorse and fights the law over it.
I'm sorry I don't care what anyone says, there are no 14 year olds that you couldn't immediately clock as a minor.
Agreed
right, at 14 i looked 11😂
"But she said she was 18 before her mom dropped her off brah"!
Yeah agree. Maybe 17 could pass for 18 or 19. No way 14 for 18. Dude is gross.
Traci Lords.
Wow, 21 with a 14 in 2003 where he's fighting to take his child off grid to live in a school bus, he's guilty.
Not everyone can afford an island and invite bill Clinton to come for a visit
@@crowdedveins9210 That's different b/c both Clinton & Gates spread HIV solutions onto & into the bodies of millions of boys & men all across Africa that might have lowered cancer in women [sarcasm]. lol, what an insane world we live in, I agree with you 1000000000000000000%.
But wait, there's more!! 21 in 2003 and solving math problems like this: Lifetime + Probation = GOOD DEAL, I DON'T NEED A LAWYER
@@SlackerU bruh it's the 5G
@@TheRealSykx IDK about that. If 5G could control minds then Biden's dementia would appear less obvious.
just starting the doc - NO sympathy for this "DIDNT KNOW SHE WAS 14" dude however a lifetime of not being able to use the internet IS legitimately crippling in this day and age
And there are easier ways to get the same thing done, especially now. Make him hand over his computer once a month to his probation officer, forbid VPNs, do randomized checks, etc. I suppose it's a lot of work but can't be anymore work than making sure he never uses a computer or smartphone.
Or not being able to in a room with his baby. Seriously, these life-long parole terms are cruel and unusual.
He's paid very heavy price however I have zero sympathy
@@radcow so you're OK with living in this broken system as long as everyone else is screwed with and not you?
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at the evidence and realize this was a one time mistake. Has he reoffended? Minus his "disobedience" and holding his daughter, are there ANY charges or violations of his parole that are remotely close to him offending? People should not be punished their whole lives for mistakes. And if you're comfortable living in this broken system, then you can't complain when it comes for you because it will.
@@johnbjones8825 and how would you feel if, a few years later you hear he did molest his daughter? It would be too late for her and you would be wrong. But this is the thing, you never know. Laws are to protect people from other people. This isn't about the guy but about his daughter. I feel bad for him and there should be supervised visits to his daughter or something but even wives ,(mothers) can be manipulated by some guys. Trust me I know.
I didn't realize David Straight was this much of a threat to the courts. Before you believe one side, listen to both sides.
They got media outlets now trying to go against him...
We're just gonna gloss over the fact that most functional members of society can tell a 14 year old girl is underaged simply by looking, sir?
He can't be trusted around children, thus the reasons for the limitations.
Revoking your citizenship will literally sever the last tie that obligates the US to do anything nice for you.
Literally all he had to do was let his wife sit in the room with him, or have a friend over, or maybe even set up a live feed that could be used as evidence to relax his restrictions.
Or, not have children in the first place
There's no relaxing of restrictions in these cases thats the problem. But this country is more than happy to punish some one their entire life for one mistake.
@Michael Lozano I agree the terms were excessive and he likely got screwed over in pleading, but then take that and those restrictions to court. Trying this insane method will achieve nothing but more problems.
@Michael Lozano if he cared about his disorder he'd ask the courts to chemically castrate himself. He genuinely believes he isn't a pedophile...what happens when his daughter is 14?
@@chonk_fox89 he raped a 14 yo. He's lucky her parents didnt literally murder him. I feel like the terms were acceptable.
The Homestead Act was officially repealed by the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, though a ten-year extension allowed homesteading in Alaska until 1986. HE IS A SCAMMER.
lol you dont say
@@tsundokus Water wet
@@MrChupacabradude go touch grass but if your on the side that he is a scammer yeah so am i all im saying is that yeah ofcourse he is a scammer you can see that a mile away
@@tsundokus what is this sentence structure?
Fire hot
When that idiot started saying, "how long do I have to camp at a property before it counts as mine?" I was pretty much done.
My cousin had a sovereign citizen break into a building on his property that he wasn't using. The "citizen" changed the locks and told my cousin that he wasn't using it. So the building and land the building is on is now his. He then said if my cousin tries to force him out. He would kill my cousin for trying to force him to leave his home.
It took my cousin three months to get that sovereign citizen removed from the building and property. He tried to sue my cousin for taking his property. He even sued him for cutting the power and water to the building.
@@fatdaddyeddiejr Wow, that sucks man. I'd have really enjoyed pulling that guy out with my buddies and taking him for a ride somewhere. No, I would not get in trouble for this, lol. None of us would. Nobody would know, he'd just be gone. Like a stone dropped into water. :)
There is such thing as adverse possession though it just requires a string of specific conditions to be met en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_possession. And it doesn't work like he said in the video.
One of the biggest conditions is it requires occupation for years without the deed owner ejecting the squatter the shortest of any state is 3 years occupation the longest is 40 years.
i was looking just like your pic when he said that
Same. My eyes rolled so hard.
" I will just go to another country"
Sure, as a stateless illegal immigrant. Good luck with that.
In order for him to renounce his US citizenship he would have to travel to another country and apply through the US embassy there. The process is not done overnight and these days most of the US embassies in the world are not taking appointments (they halted them March 2020) and have a waiting list of people waiting to renounce. In order to have legal residency in another country he would have to apply for a residency permit (green card) there; most countries have a morality clause which his conviction would automatically disqualify him. Even if he managed to find a country willing to overlook this (some countries if you have enough money can overlook quite a bit), he would have to pay 2350 usd plus whatever cost in processing the various exit tax forms.
Even if he fled to another country where there's no extradition treaty between the US and it, he would be on his own as the US will not come to the rescue in the event of an emergency. Anything the US might provide (short of a list of names of legal and medical professionals) all have a hefty fee involved. Additionally the US has citizenship based taxation and FATCA both of which will can and often does make life hell for ordinary people without his past - good luck getting a bank account, job or home to live in.
@@sdewitte1629 yep. And it costs.
I dropped my accidental US citizenship a couple of years ago at the London embassy.
My dad was working in the USA back in the 60s and I popped out. But I’m a Brit through and through.
They charged me a lot of money to drop that.
Kind of like everyone illegally entering the US at the southern border?
@@sdewitte1629 that process literally takes decades and he wouldn’t make it lol
Russia will take him. They'll have him fighting in Ukraine in no time.
A pervert/rapist not happy with an outcome after being caught...shocker. You knew her age, and you didn't care.
Q-nut A teaches Q-nut B that everything is a conspiracy. Q-nut B decides that Q-nut A is part of the conspiracy. Q-nut B shoots Q-nut A in the head. Q-nut A dies. Q-nut B goes to prison. Perfection.
Q-nut C murder his children because he's been brainwashed into thinking his ex wife has lizard DNA therefore his children had half lizard DNA
@@40yearoldvirgil15 so sad how far they're willing to go down the rabbit hole
The best thing about qanon is that it was created on the chan to drive lefties nuts. It worked.
@@brieziethirteen13 Right, because a bunch of lefties went so nuts they stormed the capital.
praise boognish
Auto mechanic: “I think your starter went out, looks like you need to replace it.”
This guy: “Sounds like my best option is to drive my car off a cliff.”
To quote the Supreme Court, "No fiction can make a natural born subject." Milvaine v. Coxe's Lessee, 8 U.S. 598 (1808). That is to say, no fiction, be it a government, a corporation, a legislated statute or act, or an administrative regulation, can mutate a natural born Sovereign into someone who is subject to his own creations.
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, testimony before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, 1911. (102) “Behind the visible government there is an invisible government upon the throne that owes the people no loyalty and recognizes no responsibility. To destroy this invisible government, to undo the ungodly union between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the task of a statesman
We’ll touch on lawyers real quick and get them out of the way first
"Every man is supposed to know the law. A party who makes a contract [or enters into a franchise, which is also a contract] with an officer [of the government] without having it reduced to writing is knowingly accessory to a violation of duty on his part. Such a party aids in the violation of the law." [Clark v. United States, 95 U.S. 539 (1877)]
THE BARCARD AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;
“The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State.”
(Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239)
“The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!”
(Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))
“RIGHT -- A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. . . “ Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961.
“Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.” City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910.
“A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent.” Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160 P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. A. 2d 639.
“The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it.” Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273.
Excellent analogy!
@Angel A your lack of understanding for American history and law makes me laugh ;)
@@MrDrocballer Society has to go as slow as its slowest citizen. That is you.
The majority of people with these types of beliefs that I have encountered seem to think that freedom means no personal responsibility for themselves.
This vice piece is mind control propaganda 100%. The super rich and corporations have monopolized everything and they manipulate markets to destroy the middle class and gain power and control. John D Rockefeller created the board of education and monopolized the education system to "create a society of workers not thinkers", he monopolized the medical system, oil industry, federal reserve, news and newspaper industry. Control the information people recieve and you influence their choices and the way they see reality. They use mass mind control, developed by the government's MK Ultra mind control studies, to keep people distracted, in fear, divided, sick, and indoctrinated so they can continue to take your freedoms away. They use artificial intelligence for facial recognition, to troll and comment propaganda on social media and even to oversexualize society keeping people using the lower animalistic parts of their brain. They removed the dislike button on youtube when the covid propaganda was disliked at a much higher ratio. They flooded the streets with cocaine in the 80's they took all the gold out of the federal reserve, they created birth certificates to use the american people as collateral for debt. They 100% traffic children in immigration camps and in foster care. All to prevent people from realizing their true history and the true potentials of the human body/mind because once you realize it then the government institutions will crumble and we'll finally have peace on earth. Government= govern(control)ment(mind). You are a sovereign being put on earth to express and create new aspects of creation. Everything you need is provided for free. Most plants growing all around, even "weeds", are edible and medicinal. The body can heal itself from any disease. The medical symbol, the caduceus, with the rod, 2 serpents, and ball/pinecone on top represents healing and medicine. The rod is the spine, the 2 serpents are your left and right hemispheres of the brain, the ball/pinecone is the pineal gland. Your claustrum produces a cerebral spinal fluid that flows down the 33 vertebrae of the spine and rises back up, sits in the hypothalamus for 2-3 days and creates a bioelectric circuit causing the pineal gland to produce more seratonin and dmt raising the consciousness of the individual. You are surrounded by symbolism, It's another language. Learn it, notice its in most companies' logos. The one's enslaving mankind understand these teachings but use it against the masses. You literally manipulate matter with your thoughts, emotions, and voice, all based on mathematics and frequency. "Know thyself". Question EVERYTHING! It's all one big ass mind control trick. Nobody has the right to take your children away, force vaccination, or create war, false attacks on society, recessions to expand poverty for profit.
You sound dumb. Sovereign literally means taking authority and accountability of one’s self. If we aren’t encrouncing on other’s rights or harming other people, We should be left alone to our own liberty.
Imagine thinking you ( not a lawyer) know the law better then a ……. Judge
Some of us do😊
I totally understand something that happened to me 2 days ago now. Someone said on Twitter regarding Texas Abortion Laws. “Wait until people find out there are people in every state the government will pay handsomely to take care of your child if you can’t”. I tried to discredit that claim by citing the $300 a month you get in my state to foster a child, adding it often takes months to get a dime of that money so you have to be completely financially prepared for that child in advance. He took a screenshot of my comment to spread around Twitter calling me a “modern day slave trader”. He took another of my comments where I said I actively help children in foster care twice a month free of charge by providing them something tangible they can keep forever regardless of it they go home or stay in the system. To this he said “This lady admits to kidnapping kids to sale for profit and thinks it’s fine”
He also told me to “kill myself” repeatedly” and all kind of other crazy crap. I reported him to Twitter and they apparently found nothing wrong despite him telling me to “put a gun in my mouth and eat lead”. I now see he baited me and is blaming me because I work with and help foster families and assist in creating adoption portfolios.
These people are insane. Are their children removed from homes they shouldn’t be? Absolutely. However personally knowing the stories of several of the newborns I’ve worked with the majority were born to mothers who were using hard drugs at the time of delivery. Some clean up and try to get them back some act like they do not even exist.
I understand that it’s sad and unfair that mothers have to give their babies up for adoption solely due to financial problems. However it isn’t the only reason babies are given up for adoption and I do not feel ashamed for helping good people facing infertility create adoption portfolios.
I would 100% support providing mothers with the resources they need if they want to keep their babies and I hope others would to. I also support a mothers right to place a baby up for adoption if that’s the choice they feel is right for them at this point In their life without receiving judgement from me or anyone else.
Regardless we don’t need the government to exit stage left when it comes to child welfare. We need them to provide exponentially more funding than they do so we can employ far more social workers to ensure kids don’t slip through the cracks and to provide extensive resources not obstacles for families that want and deserve their children back.
As far as the guy in this video I would need far more evidence that he was unaware he was sleeping with a 14 year old child as a grown mad aside from just because he says so.
I know a man who is a sex offender and his offense really was sleeping with a 16 year old when he was like 18 and they were in a consensual relationship, the parents got mad and he went down for statutory. His face is regularly plastered in the local “heartland mugshot” paper in the sex offender section. However this man has two daughters he 100% has been allowed to raise. He’s never lost custody of them and they are young teenagers at this point. He keeps a steady job at a local distribution company that’s locally owned and will look at offenders on a case by case basis. I’ve saw him with the girls without the girls mother on a regular basis.
This alone makes me feel like there may be more to this other mans story.
Stay safe out there. This video isn't the first story I've heard of its type. They are being encouraged to send out 'cease and desist' letters backed by death threats, lately. Check out the 'queen of Canada' and her followers :o
My interaction with Foster Care - My kids and I all had severe PTSD from my soon to be Ex Husband and had a OFP. I needed medical care and was struggling to care for both the kids and myself at the same time so the county Social Worker and therapist asked if I would do a temp foster placement. I agreed and my kids went to a foster home and I got to meet the family, the kids stayed in the same school, the family was nice, I saw the kids on weekends and once a week for therapy. After a few months of me learning to walk again with physical therapy (that kind of ex husband) my kids came home. The foster family sent a Christmas Card. I sent them one. I wont deny that there are likely bad homes out there but not all are bad and some help families when they are down and need support. It wasn't because I was a "bad parent". It was because the "Bad Parent" beat the every loving Sh*t out of me and the kids. It was support we needed and not judgement. If you are fearing or hating CPS it's likely because YOU did something illegal or very wrong. In my case I was praying for my kids to talk to CPS when they came several times. They also don't just put the kid up for adoption right away, it's after a while in foster care where the parent has failed to make necessary changes they have requested.
Have friend with cousin where CPS is called and let's say no food in the home. Next day they go buy food and CPS comes back and problem is resolved so they can close case until 6+ mo later and it's re opened again. So, they have things they ask for you to change or do like parents to go to drug programs and complete them to get their kids back, but parents refuse. I've heard some horror stories. Parents get clean and away from their dealer but then go back and get back on drugs and the cycle repeats and repeats and repeats. It's terrible.
@@Lizzard2060 I’m so glad you were able to get away from him and got the help you needed while you got back on your feet. Your a true survivor and a fighter.
You made a selfless decision that ensured your kids were taken care of while you healed yourself. I’d venture to say most of the people in this video couldn’t make such a selfless decision.
I can say the families I work with have all been great people. I know there are bad homes out there but my personal experience has been positive.
@@christophergreen6595 That’s just scary. Imagine directly targeting and going after people who are actively trying to help these kids. This man even made a comment along the lines of “what do you do to actively help these kids, other than get angry on Twitter.” I do quite a lot actually but even after stating it he was still describing how I should end my life. I blocked him but I hate to think he has a screen shot of my profile with links to my business and location on it. That’s unsettling.
Exactly, the man you referenced FOLLOWED his parole requirements and kept and raised his kids. I know two men in my town who are in the same situation and they see and raise their kids. This man in the video literally chose to NOT follow the requirements of his plea deal and is reaping the consequences of it. He takes no responsibility for HIS actions and lost his kids because of HIS decisions. And then the BS about CPS. My BFF is a child protective services social worker and the LENGTHS it takes to get a kid out of the home and then for them to actually have their parental rights taken away??? It’s YEARS. You have to mess up for YEARS to lose your parental rights, and if you’re messing up a child for YEARS you don’t deserve that child. FULL. STOP.
Thank you for what you do taking in kids. When I’m finally settled I’d like to be a foster parent as well. The fact that ANYONE thinks a foster parent “gets rich” by taking in kids shows how little they actually know about CPS.
How can 1 feel entitled to the benefits and protections of being a US citizen without having to follow the “rules” and responsibilities of being a US citizen? Delusional
Seriously!!!
Explain these "benefits" and "protections"?
benefits and protection??? You are cattle, to be milked by debt and taxes your entire life till you die.
😂😂😂😂
@@amysewell8141 please explain I want to know too
These people showing up to his seminar and taking notes is hilarious to me. I wonder if they go home later and study them?
Oh, you know they do, lol.
Or they could get a real lawyer and see what there rights that they really are. But nah let's listen to a bunch of idiot's on the internet. They are smarter than lawyers. Because they got there law degree at Google search.
There's no need to wonder if they do. IT'S A GIVEN.
They go home and beat off about discovering a "worldwide conspiracy theory" that most the public doesn't see except them and it's only the other side not a single human being on their "side" or "team" would be could be guilty of such a thing. When in fact they want to dismantle the system that overwatches them (all of us) from touching or beating our kids. So that they can go back to getting caught one every few years as one of those psychos you see on the local news who gets caught with like 4 kids in a cage in their basement--it's NEVER some normal middle class looking person it's always some run down trash looking people--generally the kind who seem incredibly susceptible to religious brainwashing and conspiracy theories
Same as my mom listening to hours of sermons and writing in her jesus diary. Like, what is there that you haven't heard a billion times in your 56 years? It's an ancient text with zero additions. So, nothing new except for what some schmuck spun to make it palatable for your tastes.
Delusional, oppositional defiant disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, quite the cocktail. Really the kind of people to hang out with and experience healthy relationships.
Oh God when they claim they are a navy seal they usually aren’t. That’s such a common conman thing to do. Especially online.
Nah man, me and all my homies are navy seals and their homies are navy seals.
I'm a navy seal! Well, I'm also a fighter pilot.
“How many people have had problem with the courts?” *six people raise their hands* “All of you. That’s why you’re here.” 😂
So they’re crims.
and there was 8 people lol so yeah basically all of them
Right. And typically “problem with the courts” equals “results of my own actions” so what even is his point? 😂
This falls under the same umbrella as "Why Do People Join Cults?" which there have been sizable research done on.
Even really really smart people join cults. It doesn't matter what your intelligence, political leanings, or religious background is. Its fascinating! Sometimes people just join a group of like-minded people and it turns into a cult. Sometimes a person you love will join a cult so you do too! So many reasons!
@@JRead0691 no, people with faulty epistemology join cults. Also you are twice wrong on your point about religious and political affiliation but being an issue when in reality we see that people who have fallen for cults like religion or Qanon are more likely to fall for other fantasies. Religion, flat Earth, Anti-Zionism, ancestral astronauts, etc. to name a few are all the same bullshit fueled by a lack of education.
@@eleSDSU Unfortunatly, Alrighty Then is correct, and ironically you are kinda displaying why it is so. You have a narrative that something is wrong with _them_ that makes them vulnerable to cults, but not you, you see the truth. Right there you reject scientific knowledge because it makes you feel better about yourself and alleviate anxiety.
Political parties have turned into cults too. When you go to a rally or a protest and everyone is yelling out things they heard on Fox News or cnn ect , that is like cult members being brainwashed and not having their own thoughts. The day the news goes back to just telling facts and not having commentators telling you how you should think , the world will be a better place.
@Jubal 65 thinking it’s just one sided means your the same as the qanon people. They think it’s one sided too. Your right their wrong , their right your wrong. That’s a sad way to mature in life
I’m sorry but you can’t mistake a 14 year old for anything else but a very young person.
I’ve just reached a point where anyone apart of Q or Sovereign citizenship, I just go ahead and tune them out.
I suspect that's exactly what the media has been trying to accomplish. 99% of the "sovereign citizen" stuff is straight up conspiracy theorists, tweakers, scammers etc., but I think it is actually a thing - just not what most people make it out to be, mainly because the craziest, loudest voice is the one that gets all the attention. Perhaps it has been maximally misrepresented. To give you an idea of what I'm pretty sure an actual sovereign citizen is - think of it like when you live outside of "city limits". You can still live in a city, but be outside "city limits" and some laws no longer apply (discharging a firearm within city limits or having a bonfire are both illegal here, but allowed outside of "city limits"). Or if you live in a place with a population so small that you don't have a local city/town laws/PD, so everything is handled by the county sheriff. Similarly, if you do not currently live/work/reside in a state, are a citizen, and have no home state/ statehood (possible but rare?), then you would be a sovereign citizen, still subject to federal law. For example, if you don't "live in a state" (like you might not "live in a city" although where you live is technically in that city), then because of the right to travel freely unmolested, as long as it's not for commercial purposes, you aren't required to register your vehicle for a state, and there is no legal requirement of ID. However, literally just going to the store to buy snacks is "commercial purposes", and state highways/county roads etc are all under the jurisdiction of said states/counties/cities. So it's kind of like technically, you ~could~ "travel" from 1 place to another, without using the roads, in a car(riage), without registration legally. It would be logistically impossible, but perhaps technically legally sound. The amount of lawyering up and court stuff to even attempt to make your case would be pointless, so only the crazy people even try. I'm def not a lawyer and I could totally be 100% wrong about all of that, but I think that could be like the grain of truth behind every conspiracy theory.
A wise policy.
@@redonk1740 as someone who has met a few normal q types. Yes. The crazies are just that. Crazies. Most are mentally ill. Or have gone through MAJOR life changing traumas. The more a Qanon individual mentions sovereign citizen or religious crap. The crazier they are. The more they talk about legitimate and serious issues. The more likely they part of the normie q types.
@@ethansmith8813 Lol "Normie Q types", there's nothing normal about believing some grifter who probably lives in his moms basement has Q level security clearance (which is that even a thing), and is leaking it non-stop to forums like reddit and 4chan XD
@@thejquinn lol. Fair. Yet. Id take one over the jesus is coming type any day😂
I have serious issues with any person who claims they have a "right" to keep their children.
Parenting isn't a right, it's a responsibility. And, frankly, some people aren't up to it.
More importantly, children are not property. They are human beings, and citizens, which means that the government has a duty to protect them and their rights. Even if that means protecting them from their own parents.
I'd like to see a Venn Diagram of these kinds of people who believe that 6 week old fetuses are people and have rights and those who believe that children are essentially property and have none until they are 18.
@@thesand808 Now, that would be interesting.
@Corey Hawkins My government doesn't classify them as property, actually.
More importantly, learn how to punctuate.
@Corey Hawkins well that went right over your head, so you’re probably on that diagram
THANK YOU FOR HAVING SOME SENSE!
Of course there's no record of him, he was black ops. Everyone knows that. Ask Dan Bilzerian, he'll vouch for him. 😅
i heard he has 300 confirmed kills.
He hasn't ever one a single case lol they are party of a scamming group. He will not get his kids back ever those supposed affidavits will land you in jail lose your kids and so on
@@JewTube001 do you wanna be 301?!?! You can't give out a spec ops kill co... damn, couldn't even type that out all the way without bursting into laughter
@@captainspaulding5963 🤣🤣🤣
dont tell anyone but he was with this other black ops agent name blaha you can find his page here on youtube
This kind of lunacy is exactly what will guarantee you'll never get your children back. Sovcit magical thinking appeals to people who feel like they're out of options and are susceptible to absurd claims like the one the guru makes in this video. "He's on the right track," and when this inevitably fails because this isn't how the law works, the guru will claim "well see, you did this one thing wrong and created joinder so now you're screwed." If you listen to people like this, ask for actual court cases they've taken part in. Run background checks. I promise you, these guys aren't running around with no drivers license and paying their bills with "Accepted for Value," they're using the real money suckers give them for this nonsense.
This is why the British decided America wasn't really worth the trouble.
lmfao! God save the Queen!
Thats funny
A man who represents himself in court surely has a fool for a client.
Unless that person is a lawyer right? I could see that going either way actually.
@@jdblake3224 no dude even lawyers need lawyers bro lol, you NEED someone to speak on your Behalf or you will talk your way right into a charge. Has it been done before..? sure, but its NOT recommended.
@@jdblake3224 Why you think Rudy Giuliani needed a lawyer and for Trump to pay his legal bills? 🤣
Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), Volume 7, Section 4,
Attorney & client:
The attorney's first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. Clients are also called "wards" of the court in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.
Corpus Juris Secundum assumes courts will operate in a lawful manner. If the accused makes this assumption, he may learn, to his detriment, through experience, that certain questions of law, including the question of personal jurisdiction, may never be raised and addressed, especially when the accused is represented by the bar.
Jurisdiction, once challenged, is to be proven, not by the court, but by the party attempting to assert jurisdiction. The burden of proof of jurisdiction lies with the asserter. The court is only to rule on the sufficiency of the proof tendered. See, McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178 (1936). The origins of this doctrine of law may be found in MAXFIELD v. LEVY, 4 U.S. 330 (1797), 4 U.S. 330 (Dall.) 2 Dall. 381 2 U.S. 381 1 L.Ed. 424
@@MrDrocballer thats too in depth and much to read for an off the cuff, very well known saying bro, sorry don't know what point you were trying to make.
Goes from "I didn't know she was 14" to "going to represent myself in court".
I'm sure it'll be just fine...
Stupid af to represent yourself, but really why does his kid need to be in foster care?
@@natedlc854 he probably would think the kid just turned 18
Look at this comment section dude if you cant tell that this whole vid is framed a certain way for a reason as above as below what is up is really down. Whats the doctrine of discovery?
She probably didnt have proof of her soverign citizenship so had no way to prove she was a minor. Oh and he didn't care if she was a minor anyways, thats on her.
He didn't represent himself in that case you morons lmao he was representing himself in the one for the probation charges and in the case pertaining to his daughter... smh ignorant people say ignorant things like you did here... smh
I'm not condoning a 21 year old sleeping with a 14 year old. But I do understand his frustration. 20 years later he is basically not allowed to have children or be in his own child's presence.
Not gonna lie the plot was not easy to follow.
not in the slightest
Because it's all nonsense
Tots
@Tsar LadyBug So, based on that logic... let's talk about police.
@Tsar LadyBug Sex offenders cannot apply for jobs as child protection workers.
"I am very capable of representing myself." Direct quote from Ted Bundy
Blahem?
He could have. But he was insane. Did he try that Defense?
Ted Bundy at least had some actual law education
Ted Bundy did, he had the education. The man was a crazy genius.
Watching this whole thing is like watching someone hit themselves in the head over and over again.
It is like the fantasy games I used to play with my friends as a child, where we'd pretend one of us was a witch and could control the weather, and would go follow her to the woods and watch her cast a spell and pretend the clouds were her doing. Apparently you don't necessarily grow out of it.
@@mikicerise6250 this is why the bible needs to be banned
When these type of investigative reporter's hear thousands of children could be stolen and put into a trafficking ring yet they don't investigate that possibility of children being abused tells me they may have an agenda to actually help cover it up, that should be a top priority for them to find out the truth, yet they don't mention it or report on it.
Tim Colburn took a plea agreement and at the time of that plea, the judge asked in no uncertain terms if he understood the ramifications of accepting that plea. He now has buyer's remorse and wants to change the rules.
No computers 4 life? Never have a child? Thats cruel and unusual if ive ever heard it. Plea deals screw uneducated poor ppl everyday. Now maybe the details of his case where bad i duno but the rules of lifetime probation seem insane
@@captaintoyota3171 those are the terms he initially agreed to. Those terms are not unusual in the cases of sex offenders. Like someone else said, he had “buyers remorse”.
Never have a child is cruel and unusual if you ask me
@Your Mother are you really ok with taking a girls father away from her for spending time with her. This is why the prision industry will continue to make money off us. It's a business were repeat offenders are the goal. If you really wanted a system that protected girls then you would use scientific methods for rehabilitation not this. Girls are hurt everyday because you feel better with an emotional punishment rather then one that works.
@Your Mother I was molested so I know how the system doesn't work. Your need for retribution creates a system that allows pedos to reoffend. I want a system that prevents molestation. Not one that promotes reoffenses to fill prison quotes. If anything you are the one promoting people like him to do what was done to me. Shame on you!
While I agree that the foster and adoption system is corrupt these people are insane.
It has its issues, and I say this as a future foster parent who has a vested interest in the success of the system. There are foster parents who root for parents to fail, and some foster parents don't care for the children they have been entrusted with. It's a horrible thing for a child to have to be in foster care - an absolute last resort. But ultimately, most foster parents are good people, volunteering to help children who need somewhere safe to stay until their home is safe to go back to. The violent intent some of these people show toward foster parents is terrifying. I don't see how anybody could think kidnapping their children back or threatening or assaulting people is going to get them back to normal, happy family life.
To quote the Supreme Court, "No fiction can make a natural born subject." Milvaine v. Coxe's Lessee, 8 U.S. 598 (1808). That is to say, no fiction, be it a government, a corporation, a legislated statute or act, or an administrative regulation, can mutate a natural born Sovereign into someone who is subject to his own creations.
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, testimony before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, 1911. (102) “Behind the visible government there is an invisible government upon the throne that owes the people no loyalty and recognizes no responsibility. To destroy this invisible government, to undo the ungodly union between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the task of a statesman
"Every man is supposed to know the law. A party who makes a contract [or enters into a franchise, which is also a contract] with an officer [of the government] without having it reduced to writing is knowingly accessory to a violation of duty on his part. Such a party aids in the violation of the law." [Clark v. United States, 95 U.S. 539 (1877)]
“The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State.”
(Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239)
“The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!”
(Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))
“RIGHT -- A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. . . “ Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961.
“Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.” City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910.
“A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent.” Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160 P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. A. 2d 639.
“The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it.” Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273.
The State Bar is; an Unconstitutional Monopoly.
AN ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE;
Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the U.S Constitution.
There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive branches within a state as the BAR is attempting. “BAR” members have invaded all branches of govt. & are attempting to control de jure governments as agents of a foreign entity!
Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), Volume 7, Section 4,
Attorney & client:
The attorney's first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. Clients are also called "wards" of the court in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.
Corpus Juris Secundum assumes courts will operate in a lawful manner. If the accused makes this assumption, he may learn, to his detriment, through experience, that certain questions of law, including the question of personal jurisdiction, may never be raised and addressed, especially when the accused is represented by the bar.
Jurisdiction, once challenged, is to be proven, not by the court, but by the party attempting to assert jurisdiction. The burden of proof of jurisdiction lies with the asserter. The court is only to rule on the sufficiency of the proof tendered. See, McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178 (1936). The origins of this doctrine of law may be found in MAXFIELD v. LEVY, 4 U.S. 330 (1797), 4 U.S. 330 (Dall.) 2 Dall. 381 2 U.S. 381 1 L.Ed. 424
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is indeed, quite true, that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration the responsibility is purely political, no appeal except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts Bill of Rights, the government of the commonwealth “may be a government of laws and not of men.” For, the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.” [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)]
Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government …. Constitution for the United States of America, Article 4, Section 4
Republican government. One in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627.
“In Europe, the executive is almost synonymous with the sovereign power of a State; and generally includes legislative and judicial authority. … Such is the condition of power in that quarter of the world, where it is too commonly acquired by force or fraud, or both, and seldom by compact [consent]. In America, however, the case is widely different. Our government is founded upon compact [consent]. Sovereignty was, and is, in the people.” Glass v. The Sloop Betsey, 3 Dall 6 (1794)
“In the United States***, sovereignty resides in the people who act through the organs established by the Constitution. The Congress as the instrumentality of sovereignty is endowed with certain powers to be exerted on behalf of the people in the manner and with the effect the Constitution ordains. The Congress cannot invoke the sovereign power of the people to override their will as thus declared.” Perry v. United States, 294 U.S. 330, 353 (1935)
“Inferior courts” are those whose jurisdiction is limited and special and whose proceedings are not according to the course of the common law.” Ex Parte Kearny, 55 Cal. 212; Smith v. Andrews, 6 Cal. 652
“The only inherent difference ordinarily recognized between superior and inferior courts is that there is a presumption in favor of the validity of the judgments of the former, none in favor of those of the latter, and that a superior court may be shown not to have had power to render a particular judgment by reference to its record. Ex parte Kearny, 55 Cal. 212. Note, however, that in California ‘superior court’ is the name of a particular court. But when a court acts by virtue of a special statute conferring jurisdiction in a certain class of cases, it is a court of inferior or limited jurisdiction for the time being, no matter what its ordinary status may be. Heydenfeldt v. Superior Court, 117 Cal. 348, 49 Pac. 210; Cohen v. Barrett, 5 Cal. 195” 7 Cal. Jur. 579
“Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as inalienable.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.
“We find it intolerable that one Constitutional Right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another.” Simons vs. United States, 390 US 389.
“Disobedience or evasion of a Constitutional Mandate cannot be tolerated, even though such disobedience may, at least temporarily, promote in some respects the best interests of the public.” Slote vs. Examination, 112 ALR 660.
“Economic necessity cannot justify a disregard of Constitutional guarantee.” Riley vs. Carter, 79 ALR 1018; 16 Am.Jur. (2nd), Const. Law, Sect.81.
“Constitutional Rights cannot be denied simply because of hostility to their assertions and exercise; vindication of conceded Constitutional Rights cannot be made dependent upon any theory that it is less expensive to deny them than to afford them.” Watson vs. Memphis, 375 US 526.
@@MrDrocballer you got it bro
@@JamesBrown-by5tv tons more where that came from 😉
@@MrDrocballer nice cherry picking, I've read some of those decisions and some were from dissenters on decisions or lack context with rest of the decisions in those cases or ignore superseceding decisions. People should know their rights but not be hustled by scams like sovereign citizens. No rights can be protected or given without an arrangement of people to agree on them. So basic logic dictates a sovereigns rights are not rights if they are not recognized by others. Their just opinions
LMAO, a relative of mine, represented herself in court and she came out with a fine of $20,000...she went in to fight against a $10,000 fine...she came out double...if you don't know the law, find someone who knows. Lol
for me that's the biggest problem with our country, everyone thinks they know more than the experts and professional.
"Every man is supposed to know the law. A party who makes a contract [or enters into a franchise, which is also a contract] with an officer [of the government] without having it reduced to writing is knowingly accessory to a violation of duty on his part. Such a party aids in the violation of the law." [Clark v. United States, 95 U.S. 539 (1877)]
Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, testimony before the Committee on Interstate Commerce, 1911. (102) “Behind the visible government there is an invisible government upon the throne that owes the people no loyalty and recognizes no responsibility. To destroy this invisible government, to undo the ungodly union between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the task of a statesman
"No fiction can make a natural born subject." Milvaine v. Coxe's Lessee, 8 U.S. 598 (1808). That is to say, no fiction, be it a government, a corporation, a legislated statute or act, or an administrative regulation, can mutate a natural born Sovereign into someone who is subject to his own creations
“The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State.”
(Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239)
“The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!”
(Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))
“RIGHT -- A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. . . “ Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1914, p. 2961.
“Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless.” City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910.
“A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent.” Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160 P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. A. 2d 639.
“The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it.” Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273.
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is indeed, quite true, that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration the responsibility is purely political, no appeal except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts Bill of Rights, the government of the commonwealth “may be a government of laws and not of men.” For, the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.” [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886)]
“Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as inalienable.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.
“We find it intolerable that one Constitutional Right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another.” Simons vs. United States, 390 US 389.
“Disobedience or evasion of a Constitutional Mandate cannot be tolerated, even though such disobedience may, at least temporarily, promote in some respects the best interests of the public.” Slote vs. Examination, 112 ALR 660.
“Economic necessity cannot justify a disregard of Constitutional guarantee.” Riley vs. Carter, 79 ALR 1018; 16 Am.Jur. (2nd), Const. Law, Sect.81.
“Constitutional Rights cannot be denied simply because of hostility to their assertions and exercise; vindication of conceded Constitutional Rights cannot be made dependent upon any theory that it is less expensive to deny them than to afford them.” Watson vs. Memphis, 375 US 526.
“He owes no such duty to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life, liberty, and property. His Rights are such as the law of the land [the Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his Rights are the refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under warrant of law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.
“Upon the other hand, the corporation is a creature of the state. It is presumed to be incorporated for the benefit of the public. It receives certain special privileges and franchises, and holds them subject to the laws of the state and the limitations of its charter. Its rights to act as a corporation are only preserved to it so long as it obeys the laws of its creation. There is a reserved right in the legislature to investigate its contracts and find out whether it has exceeded its powers. It would be a strange anomaly to hold that the State, having chartered a corporation to make use of certain franchises, could not in exercise of its sovereignty inquire how those franchises had been employed, and whether they had been abused, and demand the production of corporate books and papers for that purpose.” [emphasis added] Hale vs. Hinkel, 201 US 43, 74-75 (1905)
“The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489.
“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional Rights.” Snerer vs. Cullen, 481 F. 946
“Pursuant to U.S.C. Chapter 1, 2, and 3; Executive Order No. 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE, bordered on three sides. The President of the United states designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Armed forces.”
“…The agency of the master is devolved upon him by the law of the flag. The same law that confers his authority ascertains its limits, and the flag at the mast-head is notice to all the world of the extent of such power to bind the owners or freighters by his act. The foreigner who deals with this agent has notice of that law, and, if he be bound by it [that is, if he consents], there is not injustice. His notice is the national flag which is hoisted on every sea and under which the master sails into every port, and every circumstance that connects him with the vessel isolates that vessel in the eyes of the world, and demonstrates his relation to the owners and freighters as their agent for a specific purpose and with power well defined under the national maritime law.” - Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1914.
“Pursuant to the “Law of the Flag”, a military flag does result in jurisdictional implication when flown. The Plaintiff cites the following: “Under what is called international law, the law of the flag, a shipowner who sends his vessel into a foreign port gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the shipmaster that he intends the law of the flag to regulate those contracts with the shipmaster that he either submit to its operation or not contract with him or his agent at all.” - Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41, 45, 185 ILL. 133, 49 LRA 181, 76 AM.
in 1845 Congress passed an act saying Admiralty law could come on land. The bill may be traced in Cong. Globe, 28th Cong., 2d. Sess. 43, 320, 328, 337, 345(1844-45),no opposition to the Act is reported. Congress held a committee on this subject in 1850 and they said:
“The committee also alluded to “the great force” of “the great constitutional question as to the power of Congress to extend maritime jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption of the Constitution….” - Ibid. H.R. Rep. No. 72 31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850
@@MrDrocballer are you like a... Crazy person?
@@BrentWalker999 depends on your definition of crazy.
In a general sense, no
What about the provided LAW is in confusing for you.
I am guilty of being a constitutional American national, but these days it’s a crime….oh wait….
“The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489.
“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional Rights.” Snerer vs. Cullen, 481 F. 946
@@MrDrocballer so you view what you are doing as being normal?
Buying a school bus might not be the best move if you're a sex offender.....
A 21 year old knows they’re dealing with a 14 year old. Sorry don’t buy it.
So he should be punished his whole life?
@@seandavidr Yes
By the same token they say that your brain has not fully developed until you're 25 so it seems a little harsh to judge this guy his entire life for this
This dude should be locked up
Not true at all. Had several friends who lied about being 18 to hook up with older guys. Hell when I was 16 my boyfriend was 21, but we were more mentally mature in those days. Now ppl call 18yr old pedophiles for dating 15yr old🙄 so fukn stupid, thats a senior & a sophmore ffs
So many people took Dale Gribble’s rants as gospel.
Squirrel tactics!
Pocket sand!
Scgoooo
when someone you trusted turned their back on you, you will seek the knowledge that's hidden by the majority
what is a better truth,when what you believed is not true anymore
someday someone will seek the truth that is true, feels true and alive
that's rebirth, but you must "die" first
I guess some people just could never understand something that they haven't experienced
@@huluqi3972 what the hell does all of that incoherent rambling have anything to do with the main topic, or the comment thread you are in?
"Look it up", "do your research" the favorite words of conspiracy theorists. No, if you're so convinced show us the "proof".
Would you believe it if someone did? What would it take? What specific proof? Law and precedence?
It's the same rhetoric as with religious people; If you didn't find what I found, you looked in the wrong place ... or ... If God isn't speaking to you, you're faith is too weak.
@@Car_Mo “Personal liberty, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property…and is regarded as inalienable.” 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987
"No fiction can make a natural born subject." Milvaine v. Coxe's Lessee, 8 U.S. 598 (1808). That is to say, no fiction, be it a government, a corporation, a legislated statute or act, or an administrative regulation, can mutate a natural born Sovereign into someone who is subject to his own creations.
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is indeed, quite true, that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration the responsibility is purely political, no appeal except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts Bill of Rights, the government of the commonwealth “may be a government of laws and not of men.” For, the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.” [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 370 (1886y)]
Ya so hard to find…….
Then comes the stock response “I don’t have to prove anything to you, you prove me wrong” it pains me that literally every conspiracy theory is a near word for word rinse and repeat of the same theory’s used again and again over 100’s of years, how can these people not see it?, a great example is the covid vax/5G theories the exact same thing happened during the 1918 flu, coil light bulbs were fairly new at the time and people were convinced they were the problem. Somebody said “if you don’t learn from history you’re doomed to repeat it” I for one am aghast somebody even fckin remembered the person said it… in the past they were a minority, and if they met each other they’re were never enough to be too dangerous, but now because of social networking they are ALL connected, and in the case of the states 99.9999% of them are armed to the fckin teeth… millions of armed idiots…we are only witnessing the beginning of what could happen if these bellends find a brain cell to share between them…
@@MrRedPasty what “proof” would you need? If given said “proof”, would you even believe it?! NO, you wouldn’t, because it goes against your programming.
What proof do you need?
Sovereign Citizens is an oxymoron. Can’t be both. If you had done any research what so ever you would know that.
I will say CPS needs reform and the justice system we have but let's not let Qiuon nut jobs take the ring on this.
These Q nuts Dgaf about children. They can organize and track down REAL child sex trafficking rings and johns like police are supposed to do.
Instead they just label anyone with ideological differences as pedos and child murderers.
If Q wanted to truly be a force for good they could be but it's not about that.
I tend to agree with you on CPS. Unless this guy repeatedly engaged in sexual encounters with the young lady without bothering to ascertain how old she might be by looking at her friends, whom she was living with, or whether she was going to school and what grade, then the lifetime of probation makes sense. But if it was a one time encounter under a circumstance where he couldn't possibly verify her age afterwards, then there has to be limit on how long he would have to register as sense offender. We are not living in Kurt Vonnegut dystopia where CPS can prevent people who have committed sex offenses 2 or 3 decades prior are precluded from having babies. If the justice system believes he committed a heinous crime, then put him in jail. Stop with the nonsense of having to always check up on him from now on 'til his death. Who has the time and money to take on this ridiculous task of making sure he isn't allowed to procreate. So somebody has to be with him at all times until the all his kids turn 18? Why not sterilize him as punishment and get it over with. That saves all involved parties the time, energy and the aggravation.
@@youandme9569 that has nothing to do with CPS, they are just doing their jobs and they can't make special exceptions for this guy.
CPS needs funding more than it needs reform. You can reform any agency, but most all CPS workers are overloaded and management is too, and that is when you'll see mistakes or things falling by the wayside.
@@DJJahT They get federal funding in instances when they take children out of homes. This incentivizes it. That's in the Adoption And Safe Families Act of 1997. I once knew a young woman getting into social work who joked she was getting in because she wanted to take children away from parents. Getting to know her convinced me she wasn't joking.... Certain jobs attract certain personalities. I've also known very caring social workers, but my wife was threatened and verbally abused by a social worker one week after having her first baby, due to an anonymous complaint from a stranger who said the baby was too thin. Now the baby is a teenager and still thin, but strong and healthy as nails. Kind of hard to produce breast milk when you're being screamed at by a control freak maniac with government authority behind him and harassed by extended family who are worrying too much about nothing and not caring for the new mother.
The guy slept with a 14 year old and couldnt tell? And he wants to be left with a children?
The gov here is in the right.
How is that even possible, how do you not know you with a fourteen years old. And this lawyer is a scam artist.
I agree!
Yh agree, what women had child with him , she must be most disgust 🙄 and enable to have child with child molester ewww
His whiteboard had stars and triangles on it. 🤣
Illuminati confirmed
🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️🤣😂🤣
My discrete mathematics and graph theory class also had stars and triangles on the board
🤣
@@snipdeath I think it's pretty safe to say David the fake navy seal will never be mistaken for a mathematician.
I was in the navy, but you won’t find anything saying I was… NOTHING…
Same. I triedsending for my records so I couldget a va loan....nada. twice..
Except I held onto some documents I wasn't supposed to, so I have a record.
“I didn’t know she was 14”
Chris Hansen: Hold on, I’ve seen this before.
Lol. “She looked AT LEAST 16”
He should have known when she told him to bring condoms and wine coolers and offered him cookies and punch from a different room.
he was 21 and a stupid college kid. I don't think his punishment fits the crime.
@@tombirmingham7033 The pedos have entered the chat
@@slockie4472 I mean I don't think his punishment fits the crime either. Not because I'm a pedo but because I think he should have been made to go to some kind of therapist and made to be rehabilitated. Don't generalize people who aren't pedos as being pedos just cause they disagree with you.
Firing your lawyer to listen to the advice of a random rancher is never going to get you very far in the court of law. It's all well and good to play pretend like the law doesn't apply to you, but it does. If he really wants to fight to see his daughter, this is just about the worst way to go about it.
That's why we must take the law into our own hands. If millions were to do this we would be free in a week.
They just are naive. Here's the thing-there's plenty of unjust law, legal precedent that is illogical in the extreme to the point of insanity. At the supreme court level! AND there are the weird state law references to the UK crown that exist that are still on the books in some places. Sovereign citizens love to reference them, and they are real.
But none of that matters. What matters is that might makes right, ultimately. The court's power extends not from being ultimately just and objectively correct but rather from being willing and able to force the issue through violence. You play by their rules or they will imprison or kill you.
So if you are not a naive idiot, you have two choices. Play the game as the courts want it played (i.e. hire a lawyer, and this is what I'd recommend) or go straight to resisting their violence with greater violence. Anything inbetween is dumb and half-assing it.
@@wardaddy6002 Millions won't do it, not only because it's a serious crime, but because most people play by the rules, and manage to live satisfactory ethical lives as a result. But you do you, Sparky.
@@jadedandbitter i’m sorry but your suggestion is not recommended. I was accused of something that I didn’t do and I went to trial for it and guess what I didn’t accept the plea because I didn’t do it but every day people take you advice and just follow all the rules and take the easy way out every though the System is corrupt because the game is corrupt doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be honest to yourself and fight for what’s right.
@@gatesroyale Did you not have a lawyer? Because if you did, you were taking one of my recommendations. I didn't say don't fight it legally, I said that if you do,fight it via their rules with a lawyer.
"The ultimate goal is to be free"
This is the final point of the libertarianism philosophy. No governance, no rules/laws, no taxes; only my word, my identity matters. However; no matter how noble they've tried to paint themselves, these values have shown to be very dangerous and self-destructive.
IMHO: A sovereign citizen with no oversight is one the most dangerous person out there.
The ultimate goal of libertarian philosophy is not actually to be free because a natural endpoint of their philosophy is that rich capitalists will preside over you. Their ideology is a twisted perversion of the original leftist version of libertarianism, otherwise known as anarchism.
Freedom necessarily involves not limiting the freedom of others which right libertarianism immediately fails at by being a proponent of free market capitalism and supporting individual freedoms to the exclusion of the safety and natural rights of others.
Anarchism seeks a society devoid of hierarchy in which a person can not selfishly limit the freedoms of others.
All of this is to say that there is value in the desire for freedom, and when well thought out, it can be used to create an ideological framework that actually makes sense. The issue with right libertarianism is that it's necessarily anti-freedom despite the name.
Some of us live in the woods and dangerously grow vegetables 😅
@@laurakent2127 very funny :)
Just sayin that some people want to be left alone in a sense, but also only have good will for their fellow humans. Those people certainly don’t make the news, as it would be harder to paint them all a certain way ;)
@@laurakent2127 That' is very true. The majority of people, I agree, mostly just want to be left alone. The problem comes from those who don't want to listen/follow the rules/norms of society and declare themselves "sovereign". These are the individuals who are scary because they could theoretically do anything. Total freedom is anarchy
He has a big surprise coming. These people think because they do this, laws and regulations don't apply to them. They do. If Jesus Christ walked into the state of Florida today, and broke any law, he would be arrested. as well as in any other state. He can say he no longer a citizen of this country, that does NOT matter, the laws still apply to him. He is still him, so his probation still applies. They have counseling and monitors for him. I knew a guy that did the same thing, but got it wiped from his record because he used proper channels and took classes etc as told to. This guy is full of crap, he does not want to do as told, and does not want to be told what to do. This is narcissistic behavior and that runs high in mentally unstable people. They need to throw his butt in prison until he learns to do as told....
"David Straight-Up Crazy" should be his full name.
LMFAO 👌
Doesn't really roll of the tongue. How about David Crazy Eyes?
"The ultimate goal is what?"
Fleecing people.
This guys next documentary will be called “How to Not Get Your Daughter Back from Child Protective Services”
The "four corner rule" dictates that anything in brackets isn't part of the document?
That's... abundantly untrue.
Plenty of authors use brackets in their prose. You're not supposed to ignore the brackets there; why would you ignore the brackets in an official document?
As a social worker, this is actually terrifying and makes me low key glad I didn’t go into child welfare.
worked with the disable youths in state hospital, I did Probation work for 3 years I was ready to go someplace else but an incident in Panama city FLorida where a kid died at a boot camp and staff did nothing, They contracted a lot of jobs out including mine had to take a pay cut of 5%,,, it was well worth it
Social workers are Professional looters and human traffickers. Google legal name fraud.
Follow your gut. Theres more than one way to help children in need.
Get a real job.
@@abel4776 Why are yall always so hostile?
The most depressing point I see is that
once these people "take on the system " it sadly gives their lives more meaning than being a parent and loving their children.
thank you. they become obsessed.
Sadly true.
Well said. “Facebook Live” is a dangerous thing for children who live in these situations.
No it doesn't. Living and loving fills the soul with goodness. "Fighting" the "system" like this is just acting out their mental health issues on a public stage. They are the danger to children, so they project that on society at large.
They say you work out your issues by projection onto "others". It's why so many marriages fail. When we put too strong of an emphasis of "me" versus "others", our soul is degraded.
Most people have kids on accident or cause they feel they're supposed to so it tracks
It's called self accountability, something that many people don't understand
Even fewer people yet understand the limits of accountability, and the interface between independent accountabilities
@E E - Exactly! Getting married and having a kid was putting the cart before the mule.
everybody says they want self rule. but when you look on their results, you will see who can and who can't handle it. those who succeed typically take full credit, rarely acknowledging any advantages given to them. those who don't succeed typically blame the system and say circumstances cheated them. this fallacious thinking is at the root of almost all problems
I understand the desire to sympathize with the harshness of this guy's situation, but sovereign citizen movements are based on bogus legal theories (and, more importantly, have roots in white supremacy historically), and it's telling how many of those QAnon'd folks have a record with minors (throwing stones in glass houses when it comes to pedophile obsession).
Child welfare programs are often broken, lack transparency, and have their own challenges, but most abuse involves family members or known adults (e.g., family friends). People who have made mistakes should be treated with more compassion, but that requires a change in how we think about justice (restorative versus retributive). Unfortunately, what these movements call for is paranoia, violence, individualism, white nationalism (in many cases), and empty promises when it comes to meaningful change.
_"I didn't know she was only 14..."_
That tends to happen when you don't ask. Wonder why he didn't bother asking. 🤔
The irony of getting such a harsh sentence as lifetime probation, even on a plea, is that harsh blanket punishments are a result of people like him and the qanon crowd who view sexual impropriety as the worst sort of crimes deserving of the harshest sorts of punishments.
I also find it concerning he would go through all the weird pseudo-law stuff instead of the normal procedure for modifying the terms of his probation to allow him to be a father. It's concerning because it suggests there are multiple terms of his probation that he is or wants to violate.
He's just burying himself deeper all for buying into a grift.
'"I didn't know she was only 14..."
That tends to happen when you don't ask. Wonder why he didn't bother asking. 🤔'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Even if he had asked, if she had lied and claimed to 18, he would still be on the hook.
This is a messy situation of a guy who made a REALLY bad series of choices when he was young. I DO believe that there need/needed to be consequences for his behavior.
I absolutely agree with you that he needs to hire a lawyer to have his case revisited and to request that the terms of his probation be modified. This does not mean that I believe that he does or does not deserves leniency/mercy.
And I agree that he is digging himself into a deeper and deeper hole by:
1) not getting in front of this by hiring a lawyer ASAP when he learned of his wife's pregnancy
2) not even attempting to keep probation during this process
3) buying into the grift
4) running from the law
Lawyers are expensive, and there are a whole slew of things that make it hard for felons to live a financially decent life. He had a new baby (or a baby on the way), and babies are expensive.
I believe that he is just desperate to fix things, but the reality of $$$$$ is a roadblock. Enter the scammers that tell you what you want to hear for the cost of 1-3 hours of lawyer representation.
@@duckens2001 It's difficult to tell without knowing more about the case. It could be that it's likely he did know she was underage, but there's no evidence that he did. Or it could be that he was genuinely mistaken. The fact that he was given such harsh probation terms probably indicates to me that what he did was worse than how he describes it. Maybe he emotionally manipulated this girl, or continued their relationship for a suspiciously long time who knows. But yeah him being brain-dead about how the legal system works likely worked considerably against him too
@@duckens2001 I'm aware that he would have been on the hook even if she claimed to be 18. Likely would have been on the hook even if she had a fake ID (knew a guy who hooked up with with a girl from a bar who turned out to be 13 with a fake ID and still was convicted).
But the reason the law doesn't care is because guys were both 21+ and the assumption is "you're old enough to know better"
-Play stupid games (hooking up with someone you barely just met who looks like they are still in middle school)
-Win stupid prizes (supervised probation + CBT in many places)
Clearly he and his attorney knew he was guilty AF else he likely wouldn't have taken a plea with such a harsh punishment. His actions following show the sort of disregard to law and common decency that lends credence to that.
@@spiderpickle3255 - What’s so telling to me from your comment, “Clearly, he & his attorney knew he was guilty AF…” is that people truly believe our criminal justice system is equitable & just in its adjudication of cases, & that we all have equal access to competent legal representation. Typically, the people with that sentiment have never experienced our court systems for themselves or have been fortunate enough (whether by chance, socioeconomic status, or other factor) to be unscathed by its systemic racism, biases, & hypocrisy.
I don’t argue the point of whether he knew, should’ve known, or failed to get to know if she was of age. Either way, he was only 18-inexperienced as an adult-and should’ve gotten some grace based on that nuanced fact. It’s not an uncommon situation & happens far more often than society cares to discuss. More guys in similar situations have been f’d over the same way (more so when the girl lies) than I care to count.
Lastly, it’s more evident he didn’t have a paid attorney because no paid attorney would’ve advised him to accept that plea! Public defenders, on the other hand, encourage their clients to accept pleas (even the unjust, shitty ones) to lower their own caseload demands & are often in cahoots with the state prosecutors!! How do I know? I’m a law student with personal experience dealing with the justice system (both subjectively & objectively) & have vast knowledge of its perils.
To be fair this sort of crime generally has no traditional mens rea requirement... So even if she shows you a fake ID that says she's 18... You can still be found guilty. Though to be balanced I doubt that happened here.
The no parenting and no internet things I found to be insanely harsh for a life-time probation. You can't get by in the 21st century without the internet and there seems to be more practical ways to make that mandate work (like showing turning over your computer to your probation officer and forbidding VPNs or anything like that to hide your activity). And no parenting is just insane for this manner of crime to me though I have seen this before.
"That baby was so happy" he says over his own child. Knowing he's a convicted sex offender where swat had to come knock doors.
If you want to access the "secret menu" of laws, you gotta have money...
And the people it effects most don't have money.
It's wore bro if you want access to the secret menu you have to be "one of them". They have all the money they want to control us now.
For years, I worked with children in state custody and I do t k is anything about a “secret menu.” Parents who harmed their kids and had the kids removed are given MULTIPLE Opportunities to regain custody. Usually it involves getting professional help for the main problems like substance abuse or anger management. Also, they need to show up for scheduled visits and court dates. In my experience, only about 20% followed through.
@@sassynana5201 Its bad on both sides at least in TN. The agency tries as much as possible to under pay the care takers while holding as much profit for themselves. If you do not know the laws they will attempt to underpay for a child that has more money attached to it because of disabilities. They are also major racist, as most of the children are European but most of the care takers are Non european. They relegate non european people to the penal system.
In the US the people with money get to make the laws, so they make the secret menu
Child molester using his daughter as a vehicle to avoid the laws.