I have to wonder if they put on the buckhorns to further distinguish it from the upcoming Sport Glide. The new engine on a lighter frame would make this a no-brainer, but the loss of a rotor and the bars, make this "once Dyna", a head scratcher. But hey, that's why there are eight other models to choose from.
The Lowrider model does seem a bit unnecessary, but there are a lot of fans out there who support the model, so I don't think it will go away. It was a comfy ride, and the chrome lovers should like the styling, but it's definitely aimed at a particular demo.
Unnecessary to you but not for many other people. The fact is a some people are choosing which model Softail based on looks rather then form reflecting function. When it comes to that in all the Softail models the FXLR is most fittingly deserving of that title form reflecting function.
that one guy - Was between the rider and the street bob. Want to go with the rider due to chrome, larger fuel tank, tubeless tires and analog gauges. Need to see how the rider compares to the sport glide now. Thanks!
I am just the opposite in my riding. I like mids and think I can be more aggressive with my riding on my bike with mids versus my bike with forward controls. I also grew up with pull back handlebars and really like them along with mini apes. If they had an S model of the Low rider this year with the old 110 or the 114 as an option I would probably have one to add to the stable.
The Lowrider S is one of my favorite bikes! I definitely feel like I can get into turns with better with mids as well, but the combination of the mids with the pull-backs and the upright position had me feeling tentative starting off.
Mid controls are better no doubt about it and anyone that tries to say that forward controls are more effective are just full of shit. Do you see any bikes racing around tracks with the forward controls there’s a reason for that
@@dylandream2248 Agree, when I heard reviewer say forward controls "more aggressive riding style", and also when he said his 5' 7" body felt cramped, knew his evaluation was questionable.
How did I miss this test ride, way back when? The new Lowrider was never on my radar until a couple days ago. Just discovered this model has the most ground clearance and lean angle of the entire new softail line. This really appeals to me, riding the Cascade twisties all the time. I also really like the analog tach. Not a fan of the Bowling Years paint scheme, mid controls or bars. Maybe they will offer a blacked out version (Lowrider S) for 2019. Thanks for the ride and your opinion.
Oh man, the Lowrider S is one of my favorite all-time bikes! I'm not a big fan of the throwback paint on the special Sporty's, either, and not a huge fan of the '18 Lowrider's paint scheme. The black with the red and blue highlights is my favorite of the four.
I'm 5'7" and loved Low Rider. I am mid controls guy and I ride very spirited, I don't know any sports bike with forward controls. So I am not sure about your assessment. And you didn't mention it, but the Low Rider has more ground clearance than most other Softtails. So if you want to talk aggressive, I trust you not just referring to riding in a straight line, because the Low Rider should be more aggressive on a mountain road. But of course, not many of you HD reviewers talk about the ability of the different models when riding spirited on mountain roads.
Thanks for the feedback. I know there are a few Harley motovloggers who get out on the mountain roads a bit, but obviously, a sport bike is going to handle the curves much better than a cruiser.
Appreciate your reply, but I think you missed the point, this Low Rider having more clearance , mid controls and being lighter should handle the curves better than other HD cruisers .
We're not talking about a whole lot of difference between the Street Bob, and the Fat Bob, and the Lowrider, as far as ground clearance and lean angle. So personally, I think it will come down to preference, and whatever stance one feels the most confident in, when it comes to handling. I always urge riders to go out and test ride because there's only one way to know for sure. Thanks again for the feedback!
It's configured the way it is to suit SHORTER riders, possibly also Women, so why oh why do we have to have tall reviewers bemoaning this? Almost all Harleys (an other manufacturers offerings too) are configured for the bigger Guy (or girl) Go ride one of them.
The new Softail models have all moved their forward controls towards the rear of the bike, making it much more accessible for shorter riders, like myself. I have heard some "bemoaning" by taller riders, but not too much. It's nice to have a lot more options, as far as H-D goes! :)
Agreed, though the two other bikes i owned previously, had mid, and the pegs seemed to scrape a lot easier, and that always made me paranoid in tight turns.
Ummm... no.... mid controls give you better control on a dirt bike. Why? Cause you actually have to stand on the pegs to lower the centre of gravity when pushing through sand/mud. If you’re trying to “weight the pegs” on a 600lbs+ motorcycle you’re going to lose that fight every time. Your bars and counter-steering does more in a cruiser than mid mount pegs ever will. Mid pegs give the “feel” of control to small legged riders. That’s it. All they do is get in the way at stops and push your knees above your hips, which will cause agony on any distance ride. Mid controls suck.
65 mph on most CA highways (including the one I was on). Yeah, I had a commenter say there was a forward control conversion kit, but he didn't post a link. This model is so new, though, so I'm guessing there will be something available in the future. Thanks for watching!
I really like the new Softail models despite the popular opinion...but I was mainly wondering how would the jump be like from a Ninja 250 to one of these Lowriders? I'm 5'9 and ~150lbs. Pretty strange considering they're two separate classes of bikes but I've been getting more interested in cruisers. Really loving the red as well.
I'm not sure if the loudest critics of the Softail models are the majority, but there is definitely a lot of criticism being thrown around. Maybe I'm a rare bird. I am a Harley guy, but also a tech geek, and a guy who loves to see progress, and that's what I see in the 2018 changes. Is it all positive, maybe not, but I love that they are taking chances. I only hope that they listen to their customers and work to retain the loyalists, as best they can. Last time I was in the dealer, though, I heard the manager say that loyalists just aren't buying anymore, so they needed to make these changes to try and sway new customers. Anyway, your question about the transition to cruiser: First, I would say, at the very least go to a dealer and throw your leg over one and see how it feels. If you've been riding a sport bike, any cruiser, mid controls or forward controls, is going to feel really different. The weight might intimidate you at first, as the Lowrider is a good 300 lbs heavier than a Ninja 250, but the seat height is low enough for you to feel more comfortable handling it. The power in the Lowrider is nice, but it's a different kind of power, so that will take a test ride for you to figure out. It's not the jerky, quick acceleration of a sport bike, but it will definitely pull you because of the upright seating position. So, go for a test ride, and see for yourself! I'm sure a dealer would be happy to try and win you over and let you take one out.
Doesn't seem to be the popular opinion either, but frankly, I just like all types of bikes. So much crap being tossed back and forth between different communities of bikers it's actually a bit ridiculous. Nevertheless, there's a couple of reasons why I found a newfound appeal in cruisers. I loved sportbikes and the Japanese/Euro scene, and still do, but after owning my Ninja 250 I just found I don't really find much thrill in going super fast on the streets, so the idea of being uncomfortable on a 1000cc sportbike sounded pretty off-putting. Plus, I sat on one of those Indian scouts at a local motorcycle show and it was super comfortable with a bit of pullback in the bars. With that, I'd say the closest thing I've been to a cruiser was the Kawasaki Eliminator 125 at my MSF course. That thing was crap though, haha. As far as what you said about the whole deal, I love Harley's as well, especially the dynas, but I think it was a good move for Harley. These new bikes seem to be lighter, quicker, more efficient, more responsive, and overall more bang-for-the-buck as opposed to older models. Plus, I think it was about time Harley did something major to revamp their line. With the lack of loyalists buying, they also weren't seeing many customers from the people that wanted to see some sort of technological progress with their bikes. Anyone I know that doesn't like Harleys just seem to poke at the fact that their bikes were underdeveloped and staying backwards as far as innovation. Still, I could see how the lack of major engine vibration and heat could detract some character away from these bikes. Character is still a pretty important selling point as far as Harleys go I think. Still, I don't think I'm in a position to be upgrading any time soon, but these new models really just piqued my curiosity.
I did the same switch you’re considering a few years back. I went from a Buell 1125R to a Sportster 1200. After a year, I upgraded to a Dyna Switchback which I would’ve kept if not for considering the long distance comfort of my fiancé (now wife). I’d say give a Street Bob a try. It’s the least expensive of the new Softails, has mid-controls, and the best power to weight ratio of the 107 c.i. Milwaukee 8s, with maybe the exception of the Fat Bob (not comfy or inexpensive). It’s a nice blank slate to build on too. Safe riding out there!
Irony: The people who praise the Softtails from 84 to 2017 that have 2 little shocks under the engine that do not compress but stretch or elongate when you sit on it and that have no damping or rebound rate now put down the new Softtails that actually have a suspension that works and have a useful adjustment with double the amount of travel then a conventional swingarm Dyna. WOW !! really?
I'm the same height and it felt awkward as hell to me too. I didn't even ride it, sitting on it in the showroom was enough. The seat is just too low for pegs that close and high. And those handlebars off a tiller are the height of ridiculousness. Harley seems to always get close. I'd be a fan if they would equip a Breakout with a 200 mm rear tire and fix the dorky, open backed headlight. Or, they could put a put the handlebar/risers/floorboards of the Deluxe on this bike. Or, they could put the wheels of this bike on the Fat Bob. Harley knows how it should be done. They usually do things right on the ridiculously overpriced CVOs. They always screw enough up on the other bikes that they can make a small fortune off of people trying to make them work right...or look goofier.
Good stuff! As much as I'd like little things changed on certain bikes, they have an impossible task to try and please as many as possible, which is why I think it's great that their bikes are so customizable. On the other hand, they could definitely do better to make it more affordable to do that. I mean, their Daymaker headlamps for my Fat Bob are $800!!! I get marking it up for Harley brand, but I can get a knock-off brand for $150! So yeah, some really frustrating things, but I DO enjoy my Fat Bob
I currently a bigger fan of the Euros. BMW, Triumph, and even Duc are making some nice looking retros and they all have standard ergos, normal size wheels, and neutral handling. I did get a chance to ride the 114 Breakout. It has a very comfy riding position and generally felt good, but the steering sucked with that humongous rear tire. It not only required a good shove of the handlebar at speed, but required you keep it there or the bike wanted to stand up and go straight. Harley has been making some really good improvements getting rid of the engine heat and adding decent suspensions lately, but they still seem intent on making them uncomfortable, like the Low RIder, ill handling, or ugly like the Heritage. Let's face it, if us guys with 29" inseams are riding with our knees in our chest, there ain't much of the populace that's going to fit that bike as it is. Glad you enjoying your Bob, but how do you manage to reach the pegs? The newer ones do have a much less aggressive forward mounting.
I've been itching to test ride a BMW and a Triumph. I've also been really intrigued by the Ducati Diavel. Hope to get a chance to ride that. For my Fat Bob, it is a stretch, but I manage. If you watch the intro to my last few videos, that's me riding my bike. I'm going to add the forward reduced reach kit, and I'll have a video on that to let you know how that goes.
Wanted the red one so bad but I hated the foot placement. Test rode a Slim and bought it immediately. I Still kinda long for the red lowrider though, just didn't want to spend the money to convert it to floorboards
RAINBOWHIKER to each his/her own. It would be a tough sell to spend all that money, and then have to fork out more to move the controls forward. Still, not that bad if you're just cruising around town.
On the contrary the foot controls on this bike or perfect this is where you get the best handling you don’t see any race bikes with forward controls do? you there’s a reason for that.
Appreciate your point of view on this. For me, it wasn't about the mid foot controls, but the combination of the controls with the handlebars that made it awkward.
I rode a 68 with drag bars for 12 years and found it comfortable , slightly leaning forward cutting the wind instead of your back inclined backwards at highway speeds with the wind trying to beat you off , very fatiguing unless you have a windscreen and I never used one. My Evo had pullbacks and they were comfortable too. What kind of bars are you accustomed to?
I'm used to the drag bars, and until my most current bike, mid controls. The forward foot controls have really grown on me, but I'm not a super aggressive rider, so I could go either way with forward or mid there.
I am 6 feet with 30 inch inseam..which one felt the most comfortable? Also, when I sit on a Fat Bob, an older one, my feet feel really stretched out? Almost too far. How do you handle yours? Been looking for over a year. What would you get, one like yours or?
We have about the same inseam. On "which one felt the most comfortable", I'm not sure what you mean. About the Fat Bob, It was a bit of a stretch for me to start, but as I got used to it, it was not a problem. It's perfect now that I have the reduced reach forward control kit on there: th-cam.com/video/7KtITFxBtxA/w-d-xo.html
i have a custom 1200 purchased in nov 17, now i am planning to buy this low rider. the reason i am changing is the custom 1200 is bit smaller for me. i am 5'10" and i weight 100kg?? will this low rider suit me? i have yet to try it but paid the booking amount. plz advice
What it really comes down to is preference. The Lowrider was a fun ride with a lot of power, and I think it looks great. My Fat Bob has forward controls and I lean forward a bit, and I like that riding position. If you prefer to ride upright, and like the mid controls, this bike will suit you just fine. But, above all else, I would say you need to take it out for a ride and make sure. Let me know what you decide, and thanks for watching!
I have owned three Harleys now with the latest one being this unit and the previous one a Dyna Lowrider and before that a 68 sportster so I’m about 5'11" and this bike is perfect With mid controls the bars are perfect and it handles like a cat and lots of power and better suspension then the conventional swingarm frame Dyna Lowrider
Mid controls Are more effective then forward controls in terms of handling the best if you don’t believe me ask yourself what race motorcycles use forward controls there’s a reason for that
I'm curious, about your inseam and arm length because I didn't feel the same about the bikes riding position. I can definitely agree about the power and the suspension, though. Both were excellent on the Lowrider!
The more I look at this bike, the more it grows on me. Laidlaw's Harley built a bike for one of their employees and it turned out pretty bad ass. If you like the blacked out look, you should check it out. th-cam.com/video/9ZrmHah6QEQ/w-d-xo.html
Aggressive riding. On a Harley?! I plan to buy an HD Fat Boy or Fat Bob or equivalent for a relaxed riding style. I now have a Yamaha MT-10. Now that suits an aggressive riding style. But not for anymore.
Fat Boy will definitely get you that relaxed riding style. Fat Bob, too, though that will also give you the option to get on it a little, when you feel like it. Which are you leaning more towards?
The throttle is very smooth, delivering the power in very linear fashion. I would say it's a little much for a first bike, but perfect as a step up from, say, a Sportster or a Street 750/500.
For the stock controls, maybe. I guess it would depend more on your inseam, and if you were comfortable with the riding position. I did have a commenter say there was a forward control conversion kit, but he didn't post a link. Thanks for watching!
I have to wonder if they put on the buckhorns to further distinguish it from the upcoming Sport Glide. The new engine on a lighter frame would make this a no-brainer, but the loss of a rotor and the bars, make this "once Dyna", a head scratcher. But hey, that's why there are eight other models to choose from.
The Lowrider model does seem a bit unnecessary, but there are a lot of fans out there who support the model, so I don't think it will go away. It was a comfy ride, and the chrome lovers should like the styling, but it's definitely aimed at a particular demo.
My pillion said it looked like more of a chic bike now.
Are you aware that the single disc stops as good as a dual disc set up only takes a bit more hand pressure on the lever to operate
Unnecessary to you but not for many other people. The fact is a some people are choosing which model Softail based on looks rather then form reflecting function. When it comes to that in all the Softail models the FXLR is most fittingly deserving of that title form reflecting function.
Bought my first bike at that dealership. 2020 softail slim. Picking it up tomorrow.
Folsom HD is a great dealer. I've been out there to test ride, and for events. Nearly bought a Sporty from them a few years back.
My favorite bike in that color, want one!
Yeah, that red really pops. And, it looks slick with all of that chrome. Thanks for watching!
that one guy - Was between the rider and the street bob. Want to go with the rider due to chrome, larger fuel tank, tubeless tires and analog gauges. Need to see how the rider compares to the sport glide now. Thanks!
I am just the opposite in my riding. I like mids and think I can be more aggressive with my riding on my bike with mids versus my bike with forward controls. I also grew up with pull back handlebars and really
like them along with mini apes. If they had an S model of the Low rider this year with the old 110 or the 114 as an option I would probably have one to add to the stable.
The Lowrider S is one of my favorite bikes! I definitely feel like I can get into turns with better with mids as well, but the combination of the mids with the pull-backs and the upright position had me feeling tentative starting off.
Mid controls are better no doubt about it and anyone that tries to say that forward controls are more effective are just full of shit. Do you see any bikes racing around tracks with the forward controls there’s a reason for that
@@dylandream2248 Agree, when I heard reviewer say forward controls "more aggressive riding style", and also when he said his 5' 7" body felt cramped, knew his evaluation was questionable.
The bike doesn't have foreword control...They are in between foreword and mid controls. More towards mid. Handle bars can be changed.
How did I miss this test ride, way back when? The new Lowrider was never on my radar until a couple days ago. Just discovered this model has the most ground clearance and lean angle of the entire new softail line. This really appeals to me, riding the Cascade twisties all the time. I also really like the analog tach. Not a fan of the Bowling Years paint scheme, mid controls or bars. Maybe they will offer a blacked out version (Lowrider S) for 2019. Thanks for the ride and your opinion.
Oh man, the Lowrider S is one of my favorite all-time bikes! I'm not a big fan of the throwback paint on the special Sporty's, either, and not a huge fan of the '18 Lowrider's paint scheme. The black with the red and blue highlights is my favorite of the four.
I'm 5'7" and loved Low Rider. I am mid controls guy and I ride very spirited, I don't know any sports bike with forward controls. So I am not sure about your assessment. And you didn't mention it, but the Low Rider has more ground clearance than most other Softtails. So if you want to talk aggressive, I trust you not just referring to riding in a straight line, because the Low Rider should be more aggressive on a mountain road. But of course, not many of you HD reviewers talk about the ability of the different models when riding spirited on mountain roads.
Thanks for the feedback. I know there are a few Harley motovloggers who get out on the mountain roads a bit, but obviously, a sport bike is going to handle the curves much better than a cruiser.
Appreciate your reply, but I think you missed the point, this Low Rider having more clearance , mid controls and being lighter should handle the curves better than other HD cruisers .
We're not talking about a whole lot of difference between the Street Bob, and the Fat Bob, and the Lowrider, as far as ground clearance and lean angle. So personally, I think it will come down to preference, and whatever stance one feels the most confident in, when it comes to handling. I always urge riders to go out and test ride because there's only one way to know for sure. Thanks again for the feedback!
It's configured the way it is to suit SHORTER riders, possibly also Women, so why oh why do we have to have tall reviewers bemoaning this? Almost all Harleys (an other manufacturers offerings too) are configured for the bigger Guy (or girl) Go ride one of them.
The new Softail models have all moved their forward controls towards the rear of the bike, making it much more accessible for shorter riders, like myself. I have heard some "bemoaning" by taller riders, but not too much. It's nice to have a lot more options, as far as H-D goes! :)
One is able to control the bike better with mid controls.
Agreed, though the two other bikes i owned previously, had mid, and the pegs seemed to scrape a lot easier, and that always made me paranoid in tight turns.
Ummm... no.... mid controls give you better control on a dirt bike. Why? Cause you actually have to stand on the pegs to lower the centre of gravity when pushing through sand/mud.
If you’re trying to “weight the pegs” on a 600lbs+ motorcycle you’re going to lose that fight every time.
Your bars and counter-steering does more in a cruiser than mid mount pegs ever will.
Mid pegs give the “feel” of control to small legged riders. That’s it. All they do is get in the way at stops and push your knees above your hips, which will cause agony on any distance ride.
Mid controls suck.
70 MPH on the motorway i thought it was 55 MPH..
Thanx for the insight my problem being 186cm it just don,t fit ,so i ride the RGS .
65 mph on most CA highways (including the one I was on).
Yeah, I had a commenter say there was a forward control conversion kit, but he didn't post a link. This model is so new, though, so I'm guessing there will be something available in the future. Thanks for watching!
I really like the new Softail models despite the popular opinion...but I was mainly wondering how would the jump be like from a Ninja 250 to one of these Lowriders? I'm 5'9 and ~150lbs. Pretty strange considering they're two separate classes of bikes but I've been getting more interested in cruisers. Really loving the red as well.
I'm not sure if the loudest critics of the Softail models are the majority, but there is definitely a lot of criticism being thrown around. Maybe I'm a rare bird. I am a Harley guy, but also a tech geek, and a guy who loves to see progress, and that's what I see in the 2018 changes. Is it all positive, maybe not, but I love that they are taking chances. I only hope that they listen to their customers and work to retain the loyalists, as best they can. Last time I was in the dealer, though, I heard the manager say that loyalists just aren't buying anymore, so they needed to make these changes to try and sway new customers.
Anyway, your question about the transition to cruiser: First, I would say, at the very least go to a dealer and throw your leg over one and see how it feels. If you've been riding a sport bike, any cruiser, mid controls or forward controls, is going to feel really different. The weight might intimidate you at first, as the Lowrider is a good 300 lbs heavier than a Ninja 250, but the seat height is low enough for you to feel more comfortable handling it. The power in the Lowrider is nice, but it's a different kind of power, so that will take a test ride for you to figure out. It's not the jerky, quick acceleration of a sport bike, but it will definitely pull you because of the upright seating position.
So, go for a test ride, and see for yourself! I'm sure a dealer would be happy to try and win you over and let you take one out.
Doesn't seem to be the popular opinion either, but frankly, I just like all types of bikes. So much crap being tossed back and forth between different communities of bikers it's actually a bit ridiculous.
Nevertheless, there's a couple of reasons why I found a newfound appeal in cruisers. I loved sportbikes and the Japanese/Euro scene, and still do, but after owning my Ninja 250 I just found I don't really find much thrill in going super fast on the streets, so the idea of being uncomfortable on a 1000cc sportbike sounded pretty off-putting. Plus, I sat on one of those Indian scouts at a local motorcycle show and it was super comfortable with a bit of pullback in the bars. With that, I'd say the closest thing I've been to a cruiser was the Kawasaki Eliminator 125 at my MSF course. That thing was crap though, haha.
As far as what you said about the whole deal, I love Harley's as well, especially the dynas, but I think it was a good move for Harley. These new bikes seem to be lighter, quicker, more efficient, more responsive, and overall more bang-for-the-buck as opposed to older models. Plus, I think it was about time Harley did something major to revamp their line. With the lack of loyalists buying, they also weren't seeing many customers from the people that wanted to see some sort of technological progress with their bikes. Anyone I know that doesn't like Harleys just seem to poke at the fact that their bikes were underdeveloped and staying backwards as far as innovation. Still, I could see how the lack of major engine vibration and heat could detract some character away from these bikes. Character is still a pretty important selling point as far as Harleys go I think.
Still, I don't think I'm in a position to be upgrading any time soon, but these new models really just piqued my curiosity.
I did the same switch you’re considering a few years back. I went from a Buell 1125R to a Sportster 1200. After a year, I upgraded to a Dyna Switchback which I would’ve kept if not for considering the long distance comfort of my fiancé (now wife). I’d say give a Street Bob a try. It’s the least expensive of the new Softails, has mid-controls, and the best power to weight ratio of the 107 c.i. Milwaukee 8s, with maybe the exception of the Fat Bob (not comfy or inexpensive). It’s a nice blank slate to build on too. Safe riding out there!
Irony: The people who praise the Softtails from 84 to 2017 that have 2 little shocks under the engine that do not compress but stretch or elongate when you sit on it and that have no damping or rebound rate now put down the new Softtails that actually have a suspension that works and have a useful adjustment with double the amount of travel then a conventional swingarm Dyna. WOW !! really?
I'm the same height and it felt awkward as hell to me too. I didn't even ride it, sitting on it in the showroom was enough. The seat is just too low for pegs that close and high. And those handlebars off a tiller are the height of ridiculousness.
Harley seems to always get close. I'd be a fan if they would equip a Breakout with a 200 mm rear tire and fix the dorky, open backed headlight. Or, they could put a put the handlebar/risers/floorboards of the Deluxe on this bike. Or, they could put the wheels of this bike on the Fat Bob.
Harley knows how it should be done. They usually do things right on the ridiculously overpriced CVOs. They always screw enough up on the other bikes that they can make a small fortune off of people trying to make them work right...or look goofier.
Good stuff! As much as I'd like little things changed on certain bikes, they have an impossible task to try and please as many as possible, which is why I think it's great that their bikes are so customizable.
On the other hand, they could definitely do better to make it more affordable to do that. I mean, their Daymaker headlamps for my Fat Bob are $800!!! I get marking it up for Harley brand, but I can get a knock-off brand for $150!
So yeah, some really frustrating things, but I DO enjoy my Fat Bob
I currently a bigger fan of the Euros. BMW, Triumph, and even Duc are making some nice looking retros and they all have standard ergos, normal size wheels, and neutral handling.
I did get a chance to ride the 114 Breakout. It has a very comfy riding position and generally felt good, but the steering sucked with that humongous rear tire. It not only required a good shove of the handlebar at speed, but required you keep it there or the bike wanted to stand up and go straight.
Harley has been making some really good improvements getting rid of the engine heat and adding decent suspensions lately, but they still seem intent on making them uncomfortable, like the Low RIder, ill handling, or ugly like the Heritage.
Let's face it, if us guys with 29" inseams are riding with our knees in our chest, there ain't much of the populace that's going to fit that bike as it is.
Glad you enjoying your Bob, but how do you manage to reach the pegs? The newer ones do have a much less aggressive forward mounting.
I've been itching to test ride a BMW and a Triumph. I've also been really intrigued by the Ducati Diavel. Hope to get a chance to ride that.
For my Fat Bob, it is a stretch, but I manage. If you watch the intro to my last few videos, that's me riding my bike. I'm going to add the forward reduced reach kit, and I'll have a video on that to let you know how that goes.
You can please some of the people some of the time but you can't please all of the people all of the time.
saddlebag did you ever check what is the back tire size on a Breackout?
Wanted the red one so bad but I hated the foot placement. Test rode a Slim and bought it immediately. I Still kinda long for the red lowrider though, just didn't want to spend the money to convert it to floorboards
The Slim is nice. The Low Rider has all that shiny chrome, though. 😎
@@thatoneguymoto I know man. I still think about that low rider but the Slim has grown on me. Guess it wasn't meant to be.
I agree, the foot controls are placed badly. Wouldn't want them and it would be a deterrent to buying one.
RAINBOWHIKER to each his/her own. It would be a tough sell to spend all that money, and then have to fork out more to move the controls forward. Still, not that bad if you're just cruising around town.
On the contrary the foot controls on this bike or perfect this is where you get the best handling you don’t see any race bikes with forward controls do? you there’s a reason for that.
Appreciate your point of view on this. For me, it wasn't about the mid foot controls, but the combination of the controls with the handlebars that made it awkward.
I rode a 68 with drag bars for 12 years and found it comfortable , slightly leaning forward cutting the wind instead of your back inclined backwards at highway speeds with the wind trying to beat you off , very fatiguing unless you have a windscreen and I never used one. My Evo had pullbacks and they were comfortable too. What kind of bars are you accustomed to?
I'm used to the drag bars, and until my most current bike, mid controls. The forward foot controls have really grown on me, but I'm not a super aggressive rider, so I could go either way with forward or mid there.
I have a sportster superlow and now it looks like I need this also. :)
Very nice. The Superlow is a nice looking bike. This would be a nice addition to your garage. Thanks for watching! :D
Wild ride
I am 6 feet with 30 inch inseam..which one felt the most comfortable? Also, when I sit on a Fat Bob, an older one, my feet feel really stretched out? Almost too far. How do you handle yours? Been looking for over a year. What would you get, one like yours or?
We have about the same inseam. On "which one felt the most comfortable", I'm not sure what you mean.
About the Fat Bob, It was a bit of a stretch for me to start, but as I got used to it, it was not a problem. It's perfect now that I have the reduced reach forward control kit on there:
th-cam.com/video/7KtITFxBtxA/w-d-xo.html
The Sport Glide or the Slim might be more comfortable for you. You'd have to really sit on them to figure it out, though.
i have a custom 1200 purchased in nov 17, now i am planning to buy this low rider. the reason i am changing is the custom 1200 is bit smaller for me. i am 5'10" and i weight 100kg?? will this low rider suit me? i have yet to try it but paid the booking amount. plz advice
What it really comes down to is preference. The Lowrider was a fun ride with a lot of power, and I think it looks great. My Fat Bob has forward controls and I lean forward a bit, and I like that riding position. If you prefer to ride upright, and like the mid controls, this bike will suit you just fine. But, above all else, I would say you need to take it out for a ride and make sure. Let me know what you decide, and thanks for watching!
I have owned three Harleys now with the latest one being this unit and the previous one a Dyna Lowrider and before that a 68 sportster so I’m about 5'11" and this bike is perfect With mid controls the bars are perfect and it handles like a cat and lots of power and better suspension then the conventional swingarm frame Dyna Lowrider
Mid controls Are more effective then forward controls in terms of handling the best if you don’t believe me ask yourself what race motorcycles use forward controls there’s a reason for that
I'm curious, about your inseam and arm length because I didn't feel the same about the bikes riding position. I can definitely agree about the power and the suspension, though. Both were excellent on the Lowrider!
My inseam in 33.5" and arm length from tip of fingers to middle of armpit is 28"
What is with those handle bars
Definitely the first thing I'd mod if I had one.
I ride a 2016 48 and want this bike...badly
The more I look at this bike, the more it grows on me. Laidlaw's Harley built a bike for one of their employees and it turned out pretty bad ass. If you like the blacked out look, you should check it out. th-cam.com/video/9ZrmHah6QEQ/w-d-xo.html
Yeah I loved that blacked out Lowrider. Wrote my 2017 Lowrider off a couple of weeks ago so I think this is my next bike.
Aggressive riding. On a Harley?! I plan to buy an HD Fat Boy or Fat Bob or equivalent for a relaxed riding style. I now have a Yamaha MT-10. Now that suits an aggressive riding style. But not for anymore.
Fat Boy will definitely get you that relaxed riding style. Fat Bob, too, though that will also give you the option to get on it a little, when you feel like it. Which are you leaning more towards?
Is the throttle response smooth?
The throttle is very smooth, delivering the power in very linear fashion. I would say it's a little much for a first bike, but perfect as a step up from, say, a Sportster or a Street 750/500.
This bike is amazing i own one myself the black one
I like scraping floorboards on my limited...
More power to you, bud. I'm just getting over the reflex to jerk back when I feel the scrape.
I am 6'2, would be I guess a bit too tall?
For the stock controls, maybe. I guess it would depend more on your inseam, and if you were comfortable with the riding position. I did have a commenter say there was a forward control conversion kit, but he didn't post a link. Thanks for watching!