Chicago family pays thousands to keep home mistakenly built on wrong lot

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
  • A Chicago family was almost kicked out of their Lawndale, Chicago home because it was built on the wrong lot 10 years ago, and no one caught the mistake. FULL STORY: bit.ly/449Hdri

ความคิดเห็น • 1.6K

  • @CarolynForney
    @CarolynForney ปีที่แล้ว +1096

    The title company, the county assessor , the closing attorney and any parties involved should take responsibility . The government has no mercy.

    • @stephannieq2837
      @stephannieq2837 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @Carolyn, you are so right! We are going through something similar as this family and we had a home built in west Garfield Park around the same time they had theirs. We first went with a builder in Lawndale and that process fell through because of mismanagement of the organization that was over the housing program. Not at least surprised about the cook county assessors office actions at all.

    • @CarolynForney
      @CarolynForney ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stephannieq2837Government agencies in large metro area are not helpful. Common sense is not common for them. There is proof that these folks didn’t do this to themselves. This is an easy fix .

    • @bgknowable
      @bgknowable ปีที่แล้ว +13

      The title company! Come on… There had to be at least one paper-efficient attorney on duty, at any closing?

    • @arielsea9087
      @arielsea9087 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Then they want to sell Title insurance to protect you from their mistakes. They say it’s in case some long lost relative pops up. Sounds like a scam. 😂

    • @themartdog
      @themartdog ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Right, if it was the other way around and the couple made the mistake, there would be no statute of limitations

  • @MrYac-ie8ie
    @MrYac-ie8ie ปีที่แล้ว +104

    insane, they can't get a refund because of statute of limitations but they can certainly be held accountable for money not paid in that same timeframe.

    • @takenserious4554
      @takenserious4554 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They are being held accountable for the taxes they didn't pay for the improvements from 2017. They owe that. The investor that bought the errant lot is owed their money for the lot. If they ended up just paying the tax dues on their lot and acquiring an additional lot, they basically broken even. It may have been an unintentional lot purchase, but they would be able to sell their lot after they get the paperwork squared away.

  • @DrWashingtonMA
    @DrWashingtonMA ปีที่แล้ว +796

    And we thought my dad was doing too much when he wanted a land survey, photos and aerial maps before our house was built when I was a kid. I guess he knew something we didn’t.

    • @DovidM
      @DovidM ปีที่แล้ว +44

      What your father did was correct. Sometimes an existing fence or hedge doesn’t follow the property line, and you might be building too close to the actual property line.

    • @cartierwhite_lasvegas
      @cartierwhite_lasvegas ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Smart man

    • @Kookeycrumbles
      @Kookeycrumbles ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank God miss Washington, 😮 this is horrific smdh

    • @antwangordon6918
      @antwangordon6918 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      He definitely knew something that you didn’t. You were just a kid 😂

    • @localanalysts6839
      @localanalysts6839 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@antwangordon6918 kids lol even slightly grown up, baffling pompousness lol

  • @cecilb48
    @cecilb48 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    I live in Virginia and had a similar experience. We had a house built by a developer on a lot he owned. 12 years later we learned that he had never transferred the title to the lot to us. So, like this couple, we owned the house but not the property. Our lawyer and the title company were no help, but our bank became engaged when we threatened to default on the mortgage. The developer realized his mistake and transferred the title within 24 hours so our story had a happier ending.

    • @Mindyobidnessfr
      @Mindyobidnessfr ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good for you guys. Houses are way to expensive nowadays for bs like that to be happening.

    • @Commentator541
      @Commentator541 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    • @dcg590
      @dcg590 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How could you let that happen?

    • @davewilson7602
      @davewilson7602 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dcg590if you go to a house closing and sign some forms you’d assume the lot would be included

    • @actionjack84
      @actionjack84 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Technically these people owned a vacant lot ONLY until they bought the lot their house is on from the tax sale investor. Wild. Go back and check the permits sounds like the building permit office is culpable. Silver lining - find a reputable builder to build a spec house on the vacant lot with an advantageous arrangement for them.

  • @charlesritter6640
    @charlesritter6640 ปีที่แล้ว +925

    They need to sue the county.

    • @Mushroom-129
      @Mushroom-129 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      agreed

    • @NotfromDetroit
      @NotfromDetroit ปีที่แล้ว +11

      That is what I was thinking too.

    • @charlesritter6640
      @charlesritter6640 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      @@MeoMiyo a jury would side with the couple.

    • @MeoMiyo
      @MeoMiyo ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@charlesritter6640 to bad no jury for statue has run out.

    • @shari9721
      @shari9721 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@MeoMiyo the statute of limitations applies to "normal" situations , this isnt normal so the statute of limitations is null and void . It is simply being used as an excuse so they dont have to pay for their mistake .

  • @Milesco
    @Milesco ปีที่แล้ว +65

    A major question that wasn't answered in this story is _What about notice?_ You can't sell a person's home for delinquent taxes without clearly notifying the homeowner first. If they weren't properly notified, they have a valid claim against the county.
    And the Statute of Limitations shouldn't start to run until the homeowners became aware of the problem.
    I hope this couple gets justice!

    • @MyFiddlePlayer
      @MyFiddlePlayer ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They probably sent the delinquency notices to the owner of record of that lot (#38), who probably had a different address. It was that person who chose not to pay the taxes. One wonders why the owner of #38 never objected to someone building a house on their lot. Maybe the builder originally owned both lots.

    • @takenserious4554
      @takenserious4554 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They didn't sell the homeowners lot. They sold the lot they were living in (the one they technically didn't own). That lot wasn't having it's taxes paid. All lots have taxes owed, and lots with homes pay more (for the developments on the lot). So the firm that bought the lien was buying the lot they lived on (that they didn't own). That firm notified these people they were living on their lot. My hope is that the resolution mentioned here was that the owners ended up effectively buying the lot they lived on and owning both lots.

    • @patty109109
      @patty109109 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The county had no record of a homeowner because it was an empty lot in their system

  • @Dobviews
    @Dobviews ปีที่แล้ว +508

    The family being forced to pay for the county/city's mistake since 2005 is INSANE!

    • @nobodyspecial4702
      @nobodyspecial4702 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It's their mistake too. They never bothered to survey the land because that would have generated a land plot showing them where their house SHOULD have been built.

    • @socialseahawksfan9325
      @socialseahawksfan9325 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      You'd think someone in the permitting process to build should be responsible. How could they allow building on the wrong lot when the city zoned the lots to begin with if they paid for the permits to build.

    • @smiller2044
      @smiller2044 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      ​@@nobodyspecial4702 builders literally have the job of knowing where to build & building a sound structure.

    • @nobodyspecial4702
      @nobodyspecial4702 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@smiller2044 So? Clearly they can and do make mistakes. When I had my house surveyed before buying it, I was provided a map of the property, the boundaries and the associated measuring points indicating exactly where my property lines are in relation to all my neighbors.

    • @IvoryS2012
      @IvoryS2012 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The right question you should be asking yourself is why didn't the family take action against this issue since they started getting these notices in 2005?! It's their house and land, its their responsibility!

  • @JR-bw1vw
    @JR-bw1vw ปีที่แล้ว +25

    A lot of people ask me why I trust no one. This is the reason.

    • @dcg590
      @dcg590 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree. Always do your due diligence. These people didn’t

  • @rez3501
    @rez3501 ปีที่แล้ว +293

    Its past the statute of limitations yet they had to pay 43000?? This is another example how the working class gets screwed on the daily

    • @prima808
      @prima808 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Fr right? I find it SO funny when there's no "statute of limitations" the other way around. If we shorted the government money, not only would we still forever owe the money, also be hit with interest, penalties, liens...amirite?!? If they owe you, they might pay anytime from later to never.😡

    • @TrumpIsrael2024
      @TrumpIsrael2024 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@prima808 Same with taxes. If you have capital gain, you're expected to pay immediately, & if not, then interest. But if you have capital loss, you're only allowed 3000 deduction per year.

    • @smiller2044
      @smiller2044 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      💯

    • @afropuertorican8022
      @afropuertorican8022 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@Chill Will shut up.racist

    • @brandonliles
      @brandonliles ปีที่แล้ว +13

      ​@Chill Will They paid taxes and noticed there was a problem when the tax bill was greatly reduced. The county even said there was no problem when the family made inquiry. These are by all accounts, responsible people and would have certainly worked feverishly to rectify any issue encountered.
      I would call you a moron but that would be insulting to actual morons

  • @MYOB990
    @MYOB990 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Title Company needs to pay. It was literally THEIR JOB to make sure this didn't happen.

    • @dcg590
      @dcg590 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, it’s the consumers job.

    • @Katherine-qs8ws
      @Katherine-qs8ws 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@dcg590do you know what title insurance is???

  • @brucebeamon5460
    @brucebeamon5460 ปีที่แล้ว +514

    It CERTAINLY is unfortunate that the city can’t/won’t do ANYTHING to make this family whole !

    • @stooraowen
      @stooraowen ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I"d make another small senior home on other lot RENT IT OUT MAKE UP THAT X $65.000 In the long run

    • @coffeecup3177
      @coffeecup3177 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@stooraowen I would build a modern home similar to the one they own. Sell both homes and move to a State with a lower Tax Burden like so many of the Illinois Residents are doing.

    • @MzJones-wo4oj
      @MzJones-wo4oj ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I wouldn’t want to live in Chicago for free
      I lived there for 42 years been gone for 8

    • @magicworld3242
      @magicworld3242 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      They're already whole. They now own the lot next door. They can either sell it or build something to recoup their money. They can't get the lot for free, then expect The City to pay them money. His wife is just being greedy at this point.

    • @MzJones-wo4oj
      @MzJones-wo4oj ปีที่แล้ว

      @@magicworld3242 don’t nobody want that lot in Chicago they made a mistake buying the first house they bout ready to give those properties away Chicago is a nightmare

  • @jjw9222
    @jjw9222 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    This is absurd. I hope an excellent attorney steps up and gets them justice. How could so many people collect a pay check and do so much harm. God bless.

    • @SophieRocks
      @SophieRocks ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They now own BOTH lots. They would have had to pay property taxes anyways. Taxes for a vacant lot are far, far less than one with a property on it. So they own both properties and have paid the taxes. They should now sell the empty lot.

  • @OsbornTramain
    @OsbornTramain 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They didn't get "Taken", it's a mistake that happened, no crime occurred and nobody benefited from a crime, there is no malice here.......I wonder how it all got resolved??

  • @motivationperseverance3077
    @motivationperseverance3077 ปีที่แล้ว +200

    Actually the home would be nicer if it was on the other lot it wouldn't be real close to that bigger building. The city's building inspector should have caught the mistake when it was being built to get the building permit. You have to do a survey before construction how everything went through and it was built on the wrong lot with no one noticing is unbelievable !

    • @juliaweber212
      @juliaweber212 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Exactly and selling it

    • @duanem.5738
      @duanem.5738 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You don't necessarily have to do a survey prior to construction if these lots were created with a subdivision plat.

    • @Richkeyj
      @Richkeyj ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Inspectors are a joke. Inspector held up my closing for cracks in the concrete around the house and other minor things but didn't say anything about the windows and pipes we would have to replace.

    • @RR-kz4hq
      @RR-kz4hq ปีที่แล้ว

      ..... you sound like a retiree watching from the sidewalk.

    • @Gryphind0r
      @Gryphind0r 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Caught the mistake? The inspector got paid to ignore it. 😂

  • @MJCLAXDEN
    @MJCLAXDEN ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I would love to know why the attorneys didn't file suit against the title company. Title insurance should have taken care of this.

    • @Satiator123
      @Satiator123 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Chances are they are buddy buddy with the other parties involved.

    • @CastleBomb44
      @CastleBomb44 ปีที่แล้ว

      They got an attorney? Sounds like they did not get title insurance

    • @John_Smith_86
      @John_Smith_86 ปีที่แล้ว

      Title was held to the correct lot

  • @swannoir7949
    @swannoir7949 ปีที่แล้ว +236

    Something similar happened to me. A year after I bought my house, I got a letter from my mortgage company claiming I owed 13k in back taxes. As it turns out, the taxes had previously been sold -- but never PAID. The title insurance company honored my claim, and paid the back taxes, and vowed to go after "them", whom allowed a sale without the back taxes being paid (you cannot sell a house if there are back taxes). The county had my house on the auction block for 'back taxes', and I didn't even know it. My house sits equally on two lots, but it isn't being pro-rated as it should, and I'm paying taxes on literally two houses. And my house was built, IRONICALLY around the same time as theirs The Cook County assessors office are nothing but crooks, and most of these builders went 'out of business' after they built theses houses, and most were engaging in shady business practices, and if you ask me, in conspiracy with the county. They don't call it 'Crook County' for nothing.

    • @parisk8697
      @parisk8697 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And again same thing have your land assessed before buying this would of given u all info needed ppl get to lazy these days and think they can skip steps to save a few dollars and in the end cost u more so if u are paying on 2 lots that’s all on u your mistake now u pay 🤷🏻‍♀️ next time I’m sure u will do it the right way 😂

    • @levelintent
      @levelintent ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I pray everyone wronged by these satanic corporations get their money back and emotional distress!

    • @tedreynolds6363
      @tedreynolds6363 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm sorry to hear this happened to you and the Miller's.

    • @joyceboisvert9167
      @joyceboisvert9167 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      thank you for sharing this this is good to know Because when you buy a house the realitor suppose to tell you everything so when you see houses with liens on sale now I know always double the reason behind it. Thank you this was truly helpful

    • @Dachozan1
      @Dachozan1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@living2day617💯💯

  • @misterTVman
    @misterTVman ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Since they own both lots now, they can sell the vacant lot and recoup some of their money that way.

  • @103Kimberly
    @103Kimberly ปีที่แล้ว +317

    They need a better lawyer. Another lawyer would be able to figure out how and who to sue, because there definitely is a way!

    • @dcg590
      @dcg590 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why should they sue? Always looking for a pay out.

    • @parler8698
      @parler8698 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      ​@@dcg590 They've paid out a ton. They should be made whole.

    • @stephannieq2837
      @stephannieq2837 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was thinking the same thing!

    • @Richkeyj
      @Richkeyj ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@parler8698 I don't know how this works but can't they sell the other lot?

    • @ShayWilliam341
      @ShayWilliam341 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@dcg590 they should sue these folks been paying their taxes it’s not their fault someone built the house on the wrong lot

  • @peryole
    @peryole ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This actually happened to me. I paid a mortgage for years and went to check my taxes on the assessors website. I was told that I did not own my house. Luckily I bought my house from hud so it couldn’t be sold or bought by someone else. The lawyer screwed up my deed and yes, I have mortgage insurance…through that lawyer so he rushed and corrected the deed.

  • @mickeyglenn8936
    @mickeyglenn8936 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Sue the local building department, those inspectors , plan review, water and sewage as well.they should have known before any footings were laid!!

  • @missf4681
    @missf4681 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is so unjust and so unfair

  • @migm1520
    @migm1520 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Sue tf out of them. They will win. This is obviously not their fault. This is ridiculous.

  • @bioswalesbioswales3004
    @bioswalesbioswales3004 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Glad to see the statute of limitations applies when the money isn’t flowing in the government’s direction. 🙄

  • @1001Hobbies
    @1001Hobbies ปีที่แล้ว +51

    *HERE'S THE SOLUTION:* Of course the City wants to sue the non-existent builder, because *THE CITY INSPECTOR* who approved everything when the house was built IS AT FAULT!! It is the City Inspector's responsibility to make sure everything is in compliance with city code, and building the house on the correct lot is part of that. THIS IS ALL ON THE CITY. I would sue them on this premise. This is a nightmare situation for this couple. I can't imagine what they are going through.

  • @Victor-tl4dk
    @Victor-tl4dk ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Imagine if they couldn't pay it...
    Statute of limitations or not the county should have made sure they didn't "have to" pay the person who bought the property. They paid their taxes after all.
    The buyer paid the unpaid taxes to the government and the government should have returned that money to the buyer and marked the money from the other lot for the couple and gave them time to pay the small extra w/o any "penalty."

  • @bigdraco197
    @bigdraco197 ปีที่แล้ว +282

    Illinois business as usual! This is deceptive and malicious, when the assessors office said they fixed the error and deliberately withheld the mistake and monetized the situation is sickening and deplorable! I’ve been here 4 decades and this doesn’t surprise me one bit…

    • @cheryldodd-marko9787
      @cheryldodd-marko9787 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      SO SO WRONG....ONLY IN AMERICA 🕊🇺🇲💕

    • @swannoir7949
      @swannoir7949 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Teressa Stuckey But America prides itself on integrity.

    • @Tom-kn6sr
      @Tom-kn6sr ปีที่แล้ว +10

      ​@@swannoir7949 lol....our politicians can't spell integrity. They burst into flames if they get any integrity on them.

    • @phanna7492
      @phanna7492 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      What surprises me is the title insurance company weaseling out on their responsibility...something is not right.

    • @iMatti00
      @iMatti00 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Draco, this does not sound like deceptive on the part of the county assessor. Unless it’s some big conspiracy with a kickback that was planned. While anything is possible, the likelihood is extremely small. This is just called normal incompetence. Maybe you have been blessed to work at companies where there’s never incompetent people. I worked at Companies where people work there much longer dealing with Account services and people would make all kinds of ridiculous errors talking to customers.

  • @meep2253
    @meep2253 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    Why do they force you to have title insurance if they won’t even help you when stuff like this happens. Also don’t the city inspectors that come approve the building codes have to verify they are on the correct property?

    • @Zero11_ss
      @Zero11_ss ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Its another middleman scam, like car salesmen or realtors. All of this could easily be digitized and bought/sold without any intermediary who dont actually provide a service.

    • @GinaKayLandis
      @GinaKayLandis ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In Ohio at least, there are a couple different types of title insurance. One is for the mortgage company's risk, the other (not required to purchase) is owners title insurance. Sounds like owners title insurance wasn't purchased when the home was built :(. I'm a Realtor, not a scammer by the way, and Realtors help people avoid this type of situation.

    • @Zero11_ss
      @Zero11_ss ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@GinaKayLandis I don't mean the individual workers, like a single realtor, are all actively working to scam people. The system itself has the structure of a scam.
      In my opinion there is an effort to fight the overall trend of there simply not being enough decent jobs for all workers - so we have inefficient systems like these from the pre-internet era just being held in place in order for even more jobs to not be vaporized.

    • @GinaKayLandis
      @GinaKayLandis ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @shaila ja Not in Ohio. The mortgage company would have title insurance, but currently, buyers can decline to buy owners title insurance. Not sure how it is handled in the video.

    • @stephannieq2837
      @stephannieq2837 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Now that is a very good question! Will look into that for our home which was built also in 2005 in Garfield park.

  • @t8zortot
    @t8zortot ปีที่แล้ว +1

    None of this is the Homeowners fault, they should not have to pay a dime

  • @mysticgoddesshazel
    @mysticgoddesshazel ปีที่แล้ว +84

    Oh effff no!!! Someone with brains in that county needs to come forward- this is definitely one of the worse cases of fuckary that I’ve heard yet! Chicago help this family! They definitely don’t deserve this and no one else either for that matter.

    • @brandonjohnson3284
      @brandonjohnson3284 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Spirit Possession. Body snatched. Npc. Agent of the matrix. Side character. Bot. Meat puppet. Caged bird.

    • @ryanbone3537
      @ryanbone3537 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's run by democrats. You won't find anybody with brains there.

    • @Shellshockd85
      @Shellshockd85 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brandonjohnson3284 you da mayor fix this hahahahaha

  • @carminaburana9765
    @carminaburana9765 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The assessor should have contacted them and gotten the paperwork sorted out when they realized that lot 38 had a house and lot 39 didn't. The county refusing to tell them why their property value changed while continuing to bill them for the wrong lot just seems malicious.

  • @DaveColorado
    @DaveColorado ปีที่แล้ว +144

    The builder may be out of business but the liability insurance policy that he had should still cover this.

    • @vlsice663
      @vlsice663 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I mean, I would think the Sherance company would have to pay out. If you show your house was built in this year where the house was covered under the builder and that the builder made a mistake and built your house on the wrong plot. That is why they are there for no matter how long even if it’s 50 to a 100 years after How long is that building was paying his prima donna time the house was built they should still be liable and then they should insurance company should go after the builder for negligence

    • @rumooooni
      @rumooooni ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@vlsice663 exactly, it's the builders,inspectors fault FOR NOT MAKING SURE IT WAS THE RIGHT ONE!

    • @DaveColorado
      @DaveColorado ปีที่แล้ว

      @Tunisian Crochet Channel Proof of insurance is typically a requirement of their license. The building department that issued the permit will provide that information.

  • @kathysmith3287
    @kathysmith3287 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Absolutely ridiculous !
    Right the wrongs !

  • @radiatelight4100
    @radiatelight4100 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    The county failed them and they are taking no responsibility!

    • @nobodyspecial4702
      @nobodyspecial4702 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No, the builder failed them and they failed themselves by not making sure they had the plot surveyed before paying.

    • @stephannieq2837
      @stephannieq2837 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They never do!

    • @afr1952
      @afr1952 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Crook County

    • @John_Smith_86
      @John_Smith_86 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like it is their fault. As the anchor himself said, they could have paid for a proper land survey

  • @Jonathon1031
    @Jonathon1031 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a giant mistake. The builder should be individually responsible for this

  • @glass1258
    @glass1258 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    They’re extremely lucky they were able to purchase that lot . 65k is a small price to pay to keep your home .
    Sell the second lot and recoup your money

    • @digi3218
      @digi3218 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah good point. The private company that bought their house did them a favor. They could have been real evil. That lot next to them has to be worth a decent amount.

    • @eliwilson3902
      @eliwilson3902 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ​@@digi3218 unimproved land in Cook County is worth a lot. It doesn't look too big so 60k may be the real value, but in my experience you can't get anything in Chicago for under 100.

    • @s10er8
      @s10er8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's what I'm thinking, they got a heck of a deal. Sell the lot that they never knew that they owned.

    • @victoriamahon3765
      @victoriamahon3765 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably because whatever investment firm bought it doesn’t want all the bad press that would undeniably come out of this when it hit the news they sold it for just enough to get money back but not enough to make a big profit because they didn’t wanna have to deal with the PR smart move on their part.

    • @penitent2401
      @penitent2401 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​​​@@eliwilson3902near the end they briefly displayed the block size, 3,145 SqFt, how much would that be worth?

  • @imwatchingyoutonight
    @imwatchingyoutonight ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is F'ed up in so many ways.

  • @veniagivenchy1532
    @veniagivenchy1532 ปีที่แล้ว +102

    They didn't have to do that to them . They could've easily let it go because it's not their fault . That's just mean, nasty, & evil ! They should fight it & sue .

    • @kristinesharp6286
      @kristinesharp6286 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The city no longer owned the debt owed to them. They did pay the vacant lots tax bill. They should sue the owner of the vacant lot.

    • @elbertmoreno2159
      @elbertmoreno2159 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I would have personally verified that the build is in the right lot before day 1

  • @chriss-nf1bd
    @chriss-nf1bd ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The City has some liability. Even the many inspection the building inspector made didn't catch the problem? Sue the City!

  • @alphasthrive1906
    @alphasthrive1906 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    This happened to a couple in my parent's neighborhood years ago & the county switched the lot #'s. The couple was also able to sue the builders because they noticed the error right away, when they moved in. They were from out of state & had a friend that was local monitoring the build but the friend wasn't aware the house was being built on the wrong lot.

    • @erikh9991
      @erikh9991 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My client's dad bought a piece of property and built a home on it to sell. The guy who owned the lot next door lived in the area and drove by the property knowing the house was built on the wrong property. The dad sued the guy saying he illegally profiting from someone's loss. The dad won. The court switched the property to benefit the dad.

  • @SophieRocks
    @SophieRocks ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Now they own BOTH LOTS and their home. Seems they are much better off.

  • @Wulfenburg
    @Wulfenburg ปีที่แล้ว +37

    What an awful situation. I'd rather our tax money helping people lie this, than the usual way it's wasted. These people don't deserve to be left in the dark, this is insane.

  • @TheQueenRulesAll
    @TheQueenRulesAll ปีที่แล้ว +3

    They need to go after the appraiser, the title insurance company and the county assessor. All of these entities are supposed to check to make sure the lot is correct. They need to get their money back and the people involved be fired. There should be no statute of limitations in a situation where the experts and government agencies erred with no way for the homeowner to know. Why do we pay for government required inspections and title insurance if they cannot be held accountable for their mistakes?

  • @ngi638
    @ngi638 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    This is not their fault. Someone better fix this!

    • @LP-bt4jk
      @LP-bt4jk ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. Start da fixin..

  • @farajaraf
    @farajaraf ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I’m not leaving my house or paying. That’s a hill I’d die on

  • @mayurdotca
    @mayurdotca ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THEY OWN BOTH LOTS?? I would take that deal any day of the week!

  • @Amen.22
    @Amen.22 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I’m not a real estate agent, but I checked some lot prices in the same neighborhood and that empty lot might be worth $65,000 They should think about building a house on it that they could rent out. Or find out how much they could sell it for. Talk to a lawyer to figure out how to get at least some of the money back.

    • @calamity0.o
      @calamity0.o ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or they could turn it into a vegetable garden and plant some fruit trees like plums, something self fertilizing to fruit.

    • @smithiness
      @smithiness ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yea, the fact they ended up with both lots makes the reporting seem a little off. The city should have corrected all of the clerical errors, but since they did not, the owners are at least left with something of value and aren’t really out as much as reported. It would be nice if the city offered to buy the empty lot for a little more than the couple paid.

  • @terratorment2940
    @terratorment2940 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The county could do the right thing and just apply the tax payments to the correct lot. That seems like it would be the most fair way to do it.

  • @Danimal-D-Animal
    @Danimal-D-Animal ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The same thing almost happened to me when county/township officials placed my 911 address marker on the wrong lot. Good thing I hadn't built or brought Utilities in before I discovered it using a hunting app. It's remarkably accurate in identifying property boundaries.

    • @JuliaWang-ls4bb
      @JuliaWang-ls4bb 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Whats the hunting app name

  • @ronaldharris53
    @ronaldharris53 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is messed up , I'm keeping this family in my prayers and hope something can work out in their favor 🙏

  • @Glorydancer333
    @Glorydancer333 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Absolutely horrifying for this couple. They should not be blamed in any way for this perfect storm! Clearly because they payed their taxes consistently, they had the right motives Surely someone can fix this for these dear people!

  • @blackericdenice
    @blackericdenice ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No wonder the builder is out of business.

  • @OakSantosh
    @OakSantosh ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This happened with us in Pune India. Luckily,we could resolve the issue and ultimately sell the house. It did cost us a pretty penny, but we got out safely. Big relief.

  • @oldtimefarmboy617
    @oldtimefarmboy617 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In Texas, you have to have what is called a warranty deed. It consist of the history of the land from when the state first surveyed and and the legal location of every section, to the original purchaser, through every purchaser of any part of the land to the current owner of the section or lot of land you want to buy. It includes all of the different title transfer documents and titles for the entire legal history of the land you want to buy. A warranty deed can be several inches thick. When you purchase the land the warranty deed has to be updated with the title transfer documents and the newest title and turned over to the new owner.
    If you want to buy land from someone and they do not have the warranty deed, that proves they are not the actual owner of the property.

    • @Loveladylove
      @Loveladylove ปีที่แล้ว

      You must work in Title, I do as well, and I’m trying to figure out how in the world this could happen, are used to record warranty, deed, and deeds of trust, and we had several eyes verify, and re-verify the information before recording it, and the county is supposed to do their due diligence before actually excepting the recording.

    • @oldtimefarmboy617
      @oldtimefarmboy617 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Loveladylove
      One big tell that these people ignored for years is that the tax bill had the address for the lot next door and they did not pay attention to that detail. It is a very expensive lesson for people to learn to pay attention to the details and not just pay whatever bill gets delivered.

  • @MatteBlack2024
    @MatteBlack2024 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    So scandalous. The developer should make them while.

    • @kylieharrison3782
      @kylieharrison3782 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The developer no longer exists

    • @farmerbill6855
      @farmerbill6855 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no developer, these lots had houses on them that were torn down. And the builder is defunct. Title insurance should cover this, this kind of BSA is what it's for.

  • @rochester3
    @rochester3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    65k for another land, that's a bargain

  • @MyaIsWithIt
    @MyaIsWithIt ปีที่แล้ว +12

    That's insane

  • @jaidaiverson4421
    @jaidaiverson4421 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No No No. Correct this for this family immediately and Give some money for legal cost and emotional distress. As far as the company goes. They probably went bankrupt but the crook who owned it is likely to be operating under another name now still giving horrible work and should lose credentials and have his name uploaded

  • @markzelinski4434
    @markzelinski4434 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    And that’s a beautiful house! I’d be livid pissed! Sue the county and have them pay for everything

  • @ChakatNightspark
    @ChakatNightspark ปีที่แล้ว +1

    FYI you could still file suit agiasnt the Builder. You Don't go after the Building Company. You Go after the PERSON not the Company itself. Since it does not exist anymore.

  • @sa3270
    @sa3270 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I thought it was crazy when I heard about a home in Florida built too close to the property line had to be torn down. When you buy a property, check the property description on your documents against the subdivision plat and actually go there in person and count lots. Make sure everything agrees. Make sure ground is broken on the correct lot before construction begins.

  • @bryann3389
    @bryann3389 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That’s BS. The city needs to cut them a check for the 65 k or whatever it was. These poor people aren’t getting treated right, they did everything right. I pray they get reimbursed for every penny plus some for their time and stress and anxiety they’ve been put through.

  • @edwardrhoads7283
    @edwardrhoads7283 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I had one where I bought a house that was on 2 lots but the title company only put one in my name. The other went unpaid for taxes. Luckily in my case the city caught it and only fined me about 1k for late back taxes on a lot I did not even know existed. They also combined the lots at the same time so that it could not happen again.

    • @travelnomad2128
      @travelnomad2128 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      At least your county is honorable & fixed the problem.

  • @Sailor376also
    @Sailor376also ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They DID have a mortgage land survey. Is not that the part of every mortgage?

  • @hmbld1
    @hmbld1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interesting, I am a home builder and my worst nightmare is building a house on the wrong lot or over an easement or property line. I would say the title company is at fault, they are to verify a/the home is on the correct lot.

  • @robgindc1
    @robgindc1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They need to sue the state!

  • @davidzajac4907
    @davidzajac4907 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wrong is wrong regardless of any statute of limitations. The woman stated it perfectly. They should be made whole. What is the title company for if not to catch this kind of thing? I wish them well and full recovery of all the funds they lost do to others errors.

    • @kristinesharp6286
      @kristinesharp6286 ปีที่แล้ว

      They know they underpaid taxes for the last 5 years. Something isn’t right about the math. I think it’s in the reporter’s explaining.

  • @maganbrown3302
    @maganbrown3302 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That wasn’t an accident they do that kind of stuff all over the country and take peoples land

  • @justlue380
    @justlue380 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    During that time when the house was built, They were building houses like crazy!!! Other homeowners better check their paper work!

  • @BlakeCresswell
    @BlakeCresswell ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Someone needs to start a gofund me for this poor couple.

  • @mayurdotca
    @mayurdotca ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Only 65k to own both lots? They got lucky that the new owner was willing to cooperate.

  • @SMJ113
    @SMJ113 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yup..she is right checks and balances.

    • @user-gv5pp6iw5i
      @user-gv5pp6iw5i 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The banks are to blame
      They provide the funding (approved project = *surveyed the land* )
      Due to everyone being LLC (they would pass the blame = they hired/contracted ??? Company with the surveyor responsibility = *even if false* being the building contractor but since they are "out of business" *nobody carries the neglected duties* )
      Contractor (should be fully responsible but only is required to fulfill the task, nothing else = build the project) *could have read details wrong*
      City and inspectors (are ultimately responsible = should have stopped once the footings were placed) *every step of construction is required to be inspected*

  • @cedricjackson7521
    @cedricjackson7521 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It was no way no how they would have known this get a lawyer and sue the city

    • @B_22_5
      @B_22_5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They could have gotten a land survey and avoided this whole mess when they moved it

  • @robertosola7576
    @robertosola7576 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The City is suppose to inspect the house before during and after the house was being built.

  • @jamesnewberry1191
    @jamesnewberry1191 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is horrible.

  • @ilovecookiesization
    @ilovecookiesization 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder why that builder is out of business.

    • @navarruh
      @navarruh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Take a guess. I will wait. 😂

  • @jphearson
    @jphearson ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What's so hard about reversing the order of the lots to match the paperwork? That would seem fair to me before anyone had to pay anything. That's too much like right, though.

  • @evannniesen460
    @evannniesen460 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The judge should just have the lots swapped, the firm knew exactly what they were doing and a family is suffering due to it.
    What happened to justice, truth, and fairness.

  • @philliplewis3754
    @philliplewis3754 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A house moving company could move this from Lot 38 to Lot 39 no sweat! What is the statue of limitations on stupidity?

    • @alimadaniels
      @alimadaniels ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s what I was thinking. Couldn’t they just have the house moved? I wonder if that cost more than what they paid overall? I would have just moved my house to the correct lot.

    • @ShannonsBibleStudy
      @ShannonsBibleStudy ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Houses in the MW usually have a basement.

    • @philliplewis3754
      @philliplewis3754 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@alimadaniels it's kinda weird but in Canada they move houses all the time. Some are prebuilt floated on barges and transported that way then move on land to their final destination. Average cost to move a 2000² house is $32,000, it starts at $10G's thru $200G's for the mover's and permits. The foundation and construction is extra. Crazy!

    • @kristinesharp6286
      @kristinesharp6286 ปีที่แล้ว

      The house will never be sound again.

  • @Theinvisible1
    @Theinvisible1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So instead of a refund why not just swap the payments to show payments for the correct lot and update the information

  • @navmarroaming2292
    @navmarroaming2292 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Isn't that what Title Insurance is for?

  • @1luckyarmywife461
    @1luckyarmywife461 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That should be illegal!!

  • @d.h.dd.h.d.5230
    @d.h.dd.h.d.5230 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey, they shd not have to pay a dime because they had a property title insurance company.
    It's the title insurance company who insures the titled property.
    It's their sole job to ensure the property is on the right lot & review the survey for accuracy.
    It's the title company they need to focus on, legally.
    Money doesn't expire. Get a tax lawyer. It's fraud.

  • @TT-mk8tw
    @TT-mk8tw ปีที่แล้ว +1

    New buyer’s always need to get a survey done as well as a private inspection on the property… chicago is terrible… there’s so many things wrong, so many plp rent basement that are illegal and landlords take all that money tax free… the city should start investigating those landlords and make them pay fines…

  • @allbusiness7313
    @allbusiness7313 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This is why I want to be financially wealthy, to help out families like this.

  • @cknorris3644
    @cknorris3644 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First mistake was building a home in Chicago. I mean look at the neighborhood. 🤣

  • @jameshollingsworth4714
    @jameshollingsworth4714 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This is what Title Insurance is for.

    • @swannoir7949
      @swannoir7949 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Title insurance is what saved me from having to pay back taxes of $13k, when it was discovered that the taxes had been 'sold' -- but not paid. You brought up a good point, and I'm surprised no one discussed that in this piece. Doesn't sound like she had any.

    • @Chocolips05
      @Chocolips05 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Their title insurance denied it but refused to give the news reporter any comment. It’s also past IL state timeframes to sue

    • @jameshollingsworth4714
      @jameshollingsworth4714 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pretty sure when i was listening to the story, Title Insurance was mentioned, but most don't know how the Title policy works, or what it does. Most institutional lenders require a foundation endorsement, I believe a 101.4 which ensures that the house is built on the correct lot. In any case bringing the policy to the Title company that issued that policy should be all that's needed. If they won't take care of it, then it's time to involve an attorney. Of course the home owner/borrower has a duty to react to strange changes in taxes or address before it gets out of hand, rather than simply hoping it will go away. I have owned a Mortgage Company for 40 years, and have seen it all.

  • @elram2649
    @elram2649 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Terribly messed up! 😢

  • @rohiniramanchakrabarti5282
    @rohiniramanchakrabarti5282 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Father God, only you can fix this for this family. Please help them get back their money and allow them to keep their home with no further threat. They’ve been there since 2005! My God. Had it not been for covid this probably wouldn’t have surfaced. With the economy the way it is currently, everyone is trying to find a dollar. And going back decades to find it. Good Luck to this family. God Bless everyone.

    • @godiswatching2342
      @godiswatching2342 ปีที่แล้ว

      I stand with you in your prayer for this family. Amen.

  • @viv4843
    @viv4843 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How about move all the money they paid to the correct lot and bill them for what they actually owe. This is why governments get overthrown. Why do they get to harm innocent people and then claim they can't do anything about it. What a sorry county.

  • @starlight7830
    @starlight7830 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Who is this private firm?

    • @s10er8
      @s10er8 ปีที่แล้ว

      The private firm was most likely just getting their money back. At that price, they were not making a profit. They actually did a good deed.

  • @cathleensalisbury859
    @cathleensalisbury859 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So what if builders out of business. They should be held resonsible!!

  • @porsche2577
    @porsche2577 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is so unfortunate. It’s the buyer’s responsibility to have a survey done prior to purchasing a home. Buyers have the burden of proof. The only thing that I don’t understand is the title company denying their claim. Title insurance should’ve made them whole. I’m just glad they were able to stay in their home.

    • @phanna7492
      @phanna7492 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There's definitely something fishy with the whole title insurance denial...not an attorney; not sure; but it doesn't sound right at all.

    • @porsche2577
      @porsche2577 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@phanna7492 Exactly! I’m no attorney either but in some way this is a title issue 🤷‍♀️

  • @TakenTook
    @TakenTook ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The owners even called the city to find out what happened when the tax bill suddenly dropped! They weren't the ones who made the mistake. The city should apply the taxes paid so far to the overdue bill on the proper lot, forgive the difference, cover the legal fees for this family, and just move on with proper taxation going forward.

  • @CS-qc7np
    @CS-qc7np ปีที่แล้ว +5

    For me, that would be a win. I pay low property taxes on an empty lot for a few years. I just bought the lot that my home is sitting on and now I just bought the lot adjacent to my home which I can fence in, or I can put a rental property on. I hope they turn this horrible disaster into an income producing endeavor. Make lemonade out of lemons.

    • @flyscdiva
      @flyscdiva ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exactly what I was thinking. Build on the other lot they have been forced into owning. Build and rent out or flip a house on it. Or just keep the property for their children. Owning land /real estate is not the worst thing. They can stay crying victims. Of take this as a good accident move on and make the most out of it.

  • @rexross7086
    @rexross7086 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Since it was just a lot number mistake, they should apply the taxes for lot 39 to lot 38

  • @IvoryS2012
    @IvoryS2012 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    They never got a land survey?! If that's true they are stupid! My lender pulled the original surveys from the early 1900s, and they did a survey of my lot and the block! I dont understand how this could have happened?! Before I bought my house I checked the surveys myself because I was afraid to messed this up. Dang. That's why it's so important to take at least one first time home buyers classes.

  • @billydelacey
    @billydelacey ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lol Typical government, making endless mistakes then endlessly blaming their citizen employers.

  • @denisrichard58
    @denisrichard58 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When i bought my house, part of the obligation for the mortgage was to pay for insurance that covered things like improper surveys or if our house was partly on the wrong property. Does the US not have that as part of getting a mortgage?

  • @mr.grotto
    @mr.grotto ปีที่แล้ว +4

    They own both lots? They will need to sell that lot and still likely be out 20k. They're partially responsible, but nothing near this much.

  • @eattherich9215
    @eattherich9215 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As the Millers now own the vacant lot, they should sell it.