@@morgandunn8163 Yeah and? It's not England's fault that they have set a new Standard for Women's rugby dragging it into the 21st century kicking and screaming, the other teams must now either go professional or accept defeat at every game, I would even argue that it's unfair on England to have to keep playing amateurs all the time as it's holding them back from developing much further, Most of the Rugby Unions have the money to spend developing their women's side the sooner they invest in their teams the sooner the games will improve drawing bigger crowds more sponsors, the women’s games in England have exploded in the last couple of years and the size of the crowds are doubling year on year, to the point where the RedRoses are going to play their first fully independent test at England's flagship rugby stadium with pretty much all tickets put up for sale sold out already, England's money loss funding the RedRoses is shrinking each year and is at the point where in the next couple of years they will make a profit, most Unions can do this if they want to spend the money. They are the ones damaging women's rugby by holding it back.
@@morgandunn8163 I never said anything about the amount of players England has, but rather that England have allowed their players to train by funding them so they don't need to worry about work, teams with limited players can still be dominant if given the resources and training to become so.
Women's sports here in England (at least in rugby and in football/soccer where England are European champions and even beat the USA who are the best in the world recently) have gotten a lot of attention lately - deservedly so, but the southern hemisphere rugby teams won't be resting on their laurels believe me. They'll be a totally different team next WC.
@@ldfreitas9437 I assume you mean against England? That will be tough with the English forward pack tackling them backwards. If the NZ forwards can front up then sure, England will struggle. But it's a big IF
@@Nowhere2B A fair point, I shouldn't write France off so lightly. They play a very similar style of rugby so it should be an entertaining game. I just have a feeling NZ will win though, but we'll see.
Boring in my opinion. Best try was when the Aussies move the ball left and scored with multiple passes. That's what rugby is supposed to be about. It's turned into League with "legalized" illegal in my day mauls and phony rucks with no contesting to speak of. England has the size in the forwards and I can't blame them to use them and cut the backs out of the game, but New Zealand has had an excellent back division in recent years and might run rampant. Ironic how NZ took what the '71 Lions taught them and went to 15 man rugby in the last half century, and the women's side has followed the men to do the same and that's why they won in 2017.
I'm loving watching these girls from the lineout, rolling maul and scrums it's poetry but I will be moaning and complaining when South Africa's pack batter their way to a 4th world cup.
Pity about the officials gifting the Aussies their only points. A blatant "not ten" kick off preceded that passage of play. The Ball should have been in England's hands at a scrum on the centre spot, instead of with the Aussie backs..... It's not the first time in this tournament that the ref has made a decision for the badly losing side and against the laws of the game. It's almost like they've been told to give struggling sides a bit of a chance.....
I agree about the officials not getting it right! I thought the English Lock should have been *red carded* as she clearly made *shoulder to head contact* on the Aussie player, as she cleard the ruck. It's been *red card* for Mens team too *exactly same incident Brodie Retallick v Japan* clearing out the ruck shoulder on head contact he got a *red* the English Lock only got a yellow! They clearly dodged a bullet there England as incident happened in the first half they would've been under the pump for remainder of the game.
Incorrect. I have just watched this moment again. The Australia player caught the ball on the bounce about a metre on the correct side of the ten metre line.
Is anyone else bemused by the yellow card for foul play by the England second row? It’s ironic that the player with the ball has her head lower than the defender, she can’t see the defender but is guilty of causing the head contact. In most cases it’s the defender who is expected to get their head lower. I would be grateful if someone could explain this decision. Well done the Roses, yet another impressive win.
Poor Hannah Botterman: scores a perfectly good try, and a less than organised referee disalows it. Another big performance from England's front row, sets the scene for a decent victory in watery conditions. It reminded me of the pitch at Abingdon-on-Thames in the olden days, when the river would often burst its banks - what would you like, the referee used to ask, to play with or against the tide first half?
Without the TMO's prompting the referee would have had an absolute stinker. First match I've seen in this tournament where the referee was sub standard.
@@Dickie2702 You must have missed the first game - back in the day, we would have sent this ref home. The standard overall has beeen pretty poor, but it just confirms that unless you have ever played rugby the instincs are just not there. Handling in the scrum, offside lines arbitrary, try-line positioning woeful, no management but lots of chat when the ball is dead (that's a real giveaway about a ref's performance), and as for the scrums - well, don't get me going! My mate Brian M must be tearing his hair out - or would, if he had any left. Me? - reffed to European levels, then assessed refs for the RFU - but now FAR too old to make a come-back!
@@leplessis8179 I have watched a few games but not all. Poor referring has been rife at international level for years (mens game). It's sad that a few decesions can alter the whole nature of the game. I played to a respectable standard but that was 45 years ago, not the same game as is played today.
@@Dickie2702 Yes, quite agree: it all started in the 1990s, when the RFU appointed two schoolteachers to be head of the refereeing department: like many teachers they could deliver a curriculum, but had no insight or innovation - and the game was changing fast. Referees with character were dispensed with, becausse they challenged the ego-led administrators and exposed them for what they were - which was hopeless. Rob Andrew (Squeaky) was in charge at the time, and if a good player (at times) he was a hopeless manager but 'safe' for the RFU - who eventually 'found him out' and saved themselves £265K a year - yes, that was his salary to achieving nothing. I could go on all day (oh please, do let me!) because I got 'chucked out' as well, for telling the truth about how referee assessments were being 'fiddled' to suit their favourites - completely true. Oh well, now 76, but still refereeing in France when time permits, using less whistle but more verbals these days (What was that penalty for, referee? For being a naughty Boy - now clear off, or I'll tell your Mum what a twerp you were being). Humble player retreats, chastened. Never, ever, failed, and still never does. Happy Days.
Phenomenal effort and a great win yet again. Typical Red Roses win with their dominance stamped throughout! The area of concern yet again is the conversion % on the kicks. Emily is world class but she seems off colour in the last few games averaging very very mediocre rates. (heavy rain or not). In games where these misses don't amount to much its ok, but like yesterday's SCO v AUS men's game , a single kick could make that difference. I suppose, Rowland or Harrison should take on the kicking duties ?
Scaz's kicking has been off since she broke her leg, as much as I love her and she still is a world class player maybe Simon needs to start looking at different kickers as his main.
This is fairly typical for Scaz. If you look back at WC 2017, her kicking was off until the final when she locked in and knocked over some great kicks. I’m hoping it’s going to be the same in this tournament
A couple of seasons ago Zoe couldn't miss her place kicks but I know that she had a injury and has never regained that success rate but I would be tempted to make her first choice kicker. ES has been inconsistent for a while, it must be down to her injury also. This needs to be sorted out as the Red Roses cannot afford to miss so many conversions at this stage of the tournament. Perhaps Helena should be getting more opportunity.
Of course, now Eng are being pilloried for relying on their forward power. Remember 1991 WC Final v Aus? Eng changed their style and lost to an Aus side who used them. Another own goal. Don't listen girls. Stick to what you do best!
England won despite the efforts of Harrison and Infante. Why England left their best scrum half at home is stupidly. Thank goodness for the power of their scrum and lineout.
Simon Middleton wants the game to be managed by 10 and 12 not by the scrum half - Mo Hunt's style hence he picked Leanne and Lucy and having Claudia as well (similar style to Mo but more versatile). I think that Leanne is a terrific 9 and Lucy has played well and will get better.
The back line was very much involved in the game yesterday. The fact that they didn’t make the points is simply a reflection of the conditions. A great team wins according to what they see in front of them, and today’s game was always going to be a forwards’ game. This team has shown, on many occasions, the strength and speed of their back line. You don’t win 29 games in a row by being a one trick pony. Oh, and out of England’s seven tries, only one was scored by the front five. Five came from the back row and one from a winger.
@@rabbitss11 for the life of me I can’t work out what you’re implying, but it seems you’re intent on belittling the achievement of the team. I can only think you have an axe to grind.
It's not England's fault that they have to play against amateurs, they have set a new Standard for Women's rugby dragging it into the 21st century kicking and screaming, the other teams must now either go professional or accept defeat at every game, I would even argue that it's unfair on England to have to keep playing amateurs all the time as it's holding them back from developing much further, Most of the Rugby Unions have the money to spend developing their women's side the sooner they invest in their teams the sooner the games will improve drawing bigger crowds more sponsors, the women’s games in England have exploded in the last couple of years and the size of the crowds are doubling year on year, to the point where the RedRoses are going to play their first fully independent test at England's flagship rugby stadium with pretty much all tickets put up for sale sold out already, England's money loss funding the RedRoses is shrinking each year and is at the point where in the next couple of years they will make a profit, most Unions can do this if they want to spend the money. They are the ones damaging women's rugby by holding it back.
The highlights didn't show how England manage to get so close to the try line. When you are within inches of the line and the weather is terrible why risk it going through wet hands? A win is a win, I bet the Aussies wouldn't have minded winning by push over tries..
No matter how much people try to big women's rugby league and Union up, and no matter how good the English team currently are against their counterparts , no one is interested or wants to watch it
5 months later England's Red Roses beat France at Twickenham in front of a 58,498 fans, despite the match being shown live on BBC. Maybe you should reconsider
When I played rugby, mauls such as in today's game were totally illegal. It's legalized obstruction. I don't know exactly when the law changed, but in the early and mid 2000s, teams employing this tactic started to get away with it, with players ahead of the ball carrier. That needs to change back to the old law. Very simply, a ball carrier could have teammates bind on behind and shove him/her forward. No teammate could be in front of the ball carrier. The ball carrier's back would face the opposition, and if the maul was stopped, then the player attempted to get the ball back to an acting scrum half or scrum half.
Great performance in frankly abysmal conditions - and now 29 wins on the bounce. Well done England!!!
There the only professional side u see lol
@@morgandunn8163 Yeah and?
It's not England's fault that they have set a new Standard for Women's rugby dragging it into the 21st century kicking and screaming, the other teams must now either go professional or accept defeat at every game, I would even argue that it's unfair on England to have to keep playing amateurs all the time as it's holding them back from developing much further,
Most of the Rugby Unions have the money to spend developing their women's side the sooner they invest in their teams the sooner the games will improve drawing bigger crowds more sponsors, the women’s games in England have exploded in the last couple of years and the size of the crowds are doubling year on year, to the point where the RedRoses are going to play their first fully independent test at England's flagship rugby stadium with pretty much all tickets put up for sale sold out already, England's money loss funding the RedRoses is shrinking each year and is at the point where in the next couple of years they will make a profit, most Unions can do this if they want to spend the money. They are the ones damaging women's rugby by holding it back.
@@Autofleet4429 england are a country of like 65 million of course they are gonna have a bigger range of players to pick from
@@morgandunn8163 I never said anything about the amount of players England has, but rather that England have allowed their players to train by funding them so they don't need to worry about work, teams with limited players can still be dominant if given the resources and training to become so.
@@morgandunn8163 yes because we’re to blame for your side being amateur right?
The physicality and power of the English forwards was too much for Australia to handle. Well done England
Womens sport in the UK looking brilliant! Awesome team and amazing result!
Football Ruby, better than the men. No Prema Donnas.
They should enjoy it while they can. As a brit I think they've opened the doors...
Women's sports here in England (at least in rugby and in football/soccer where England are European champions and even beat the USA who are the best in the world recently) have gotten a lot of attention lately - deservedly so, but the southern hemisphere rugby teams won't be resting on their laurels believe me. They'll be a totally different team next WC.
@@TeamCGS2005 that's good to hear !
The skill levels in those conditions was impressive. Well both teams and well done England.
That was brute force rugby at it's best. Looking like we'll have a NZ vs Eng final - should be a belter
If New Zealand spreads the ball out to the backs, they'll win.
NZ will not get passed France, England will beat France in the final.
@@ldfreitas9437 I assume you mean against England? That will be tough with the English forward pack tackling them backwards. If the NZ forwards can front up then sure, England will struggle. But it's a big IF
@@Nowhere2B A fair point, I shouldn't write France off so lightly. They play a very similar style of rugby so it should be an entertaining game.
I just have a feeling NZ will win though, but we'll see.
If only the editing was as good as the England performance...
The English ladies are an absolute machine!
English proud! Well done girls, great game in very horrible conditions, lets go all the way! 'Come on England-Yay!☺👍🏉🌹
Well played England ladies
This England team is unbelievable
Well it looks like we brought the rain with us lol not a bad score to say it was streaming wet.
Great work ladies.
looking forward the next game. love it
Awful conditions but this was a World Cup quarter final , where on earth were the crowd ?
Well the weather didn’t help
welcome to being a fan of women's rugby, where the only thing more depressing than the lack of funding is the lack of fans
Who would go to a sporting event in those conditions? Watch it at home.
Excellent performance. Clinical.
Boring in my opinion. Best try was when the Aussies move the ball left and scored with multiple passes. That's what rugby is supposed to be about. It's turned into League with "legalized" illegal in my day mauls and phony rucks with no contesting to speak of. England has the size in the forwards and I can't blame them to use them and cut the backs out of the game, but New Zealand has had an excellent back division in recent years and might run rampant. Ironic how NZ took what the '71 Lions taught them and went to 15 man rugby in the last half century, and the women's side has followed the men to do the same and that's why they won in 2017.
I'm loving watching these girls from the lineout, rolling maul and scrums it's poetry but I will be moaning and complaining when South Africa's pack batter their way to a 4th world cup.
1995, 2007, 2019. South Africa has to wait until 2031.
Well, that was frighteningly good. Can anyone match them?
Nope
Too good!
Typical British conditions, the Aussies had no chance.
It is occasionally like this in UK but not typical.
Pity about the officials gifting the Aussies their only points. A blatant "not ten" kick off preceded that passage of play.
The Ball should have been in England's hands at a scrum on the centre spot, instead of with the Aussie backs.....
It's not the first time in this tournament that the ref has made a decision for the badly losing side and against the laws of the game. It's almost like they've been told to give struggling sides a bit of a chance.....
I agree about the officials not getting it right! I thought the English Lock should have been *red carded* as she clearly made *shoulder to head contact* on the Aussie player, as she cleard the ruck.
It's been *red card* for Mens team too *exactly same incident Brodie Retallick v Japan* clearing out the ruck shoulder on head contact he got a *red* the English Lock only got a yellow! They clearly dodged a bullet there England as incident happened in the first half they would've been under the pump for remainder of the game.
Incorrect. I have just watched this moment again. The Australia player caught the ball on the bounce about a metre on the correct side of the ten metre line.
Not the weather for slinging it about , good tactics. Shifting point of attacks working well!
And yet Australia managed a brilliant try ‘slinging it about’.
@@grahamriley8124 lol yay! Just one!! The whole match just one. Get out of here!
@@grahamriley8124 A tactic that got them a single, solitary try. Great tactics if you like losing!
@@grahamriley8124 It worked once; the rest of the time their handling was abysmal.
Easy, easy, easy 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Is anyone else bemused by the yellow card for foul play by the England second row? It’s ironic that the player with the ball has her head lower than the defender, she can’t see the defender but is guilty of causing the head contact. In most cases it’s the defender who is expected to get their head lower. I would be grateful if someone could explain this decision. Well done the Roses, yet another impressive win.
I remember playing rugby in rain like that - but there was always a lot more mud...
Well don England you played a blinder so you deserved the win .
So proud of our girls..
Poor Hannah Botterman: scores a perfectly good try, and a less than organised referee disalows it. Another big performance from England's front row, sets the scene for a decent victory in watery conditions. It reminded me of the pitch at Abingdon-on-Thames in the olden days, when the river would often burst its banks - what would you like, the referee used to ask, to play with or against the tide first half?
Without the TMO's prompting the referee would have had an absolute stinker. First match I've seen in this tournament where the referee was sub standard.
@@Dickie2702 You must have missed the first game - back in the day, we would have sent this ref home. The standard overall has beeen pretty poor, but it just confirms that unless you have ever played rugby the instincs are just not there.
Handling in the scrum, offside lines arbitrary, try-line positioning woeful, no management but lots of chat when the ball is dead (that's a real giveaway about a ref's performance), and as for the scrums - well, don't get me going! My mate Brian M must be tearing his hair out - or would, if he had any left. Me? - reffed to European levels, then assessed refs for the RFU - but now FAR too old to make a come-back!
@@leplessis8179 I have watched a few games but not all. Poor referring has been rife at international level for years (mens game). It's sad that a few decesions can alter the whole nature of the game. I played to a respectable standard but that was 45 years ago, not the same game as is played today.
@@Dickie2702 Yes, quite agree: it all started in the 1990s, when the RFU appointed two schoolteachers to be head of the refereeing department: like many teachers they could deliver a curriculum, but had no insight or innovation - and the game was changing fast. Referees with character were dispensed with, becausse they challenged the ego-led administrators and exposed them for what they were - which was hopeless. Rob Andrew (Squeaky) was in charge at the time, and if a good player (at times) he was a hopeless manager but 'safe' for the RFU - who eventually 'found him out' and saved themselves £265K a year - yes, that was his salary to achieving nothing. I could go on all day (oh please, do let me!) because I got 'chucked out' as well, for telling the truth about how referee assessments were being 'fiddled' to suit their favourites - completely true. Oh well, now 76, but still refereeing in France when time permits, using less whistle but more verbals these days (What was that penalty for, referee? For being a naughty Boy - now clear off, or I'll tell your Mum what a twerp you were being). Humble player retreats, chastened.
Never, ever, failed, and still never does.
Happy Days.
Phenomenal effort and a great win yet again. Typical Red Roses win with their dominance stamped throughout! The area of concern yet again is the conversion % on the kicks. Emily is world class but she seems off colour in the last few games averaging very very mediocre rates. (heavy rain or not). In games where these misses don't amount to much its ok, but like yesterday's SCO v AUS men's game , a single kick could make that difference. I suppose, Rowland or Harrison should take on the kicking duties ?
Scaz's kicking has been off since she broke her leg, as much as I love her and she still is a world class player maybe Simon needs to start looking at different kickers as his main.
This is fairly typical for Scaz. If you look back at WC 2017, her kicking was off until the final when she locked in and knocked over some great kicks.
I’m hoping it’s going to be the same in this tournament
A couple of seasons ago Zoe couldn't miss her place kicks but I know that she had a injury and has never regained
that success rate but I would be tempted to make her first choice kicker. ES has been inconsistent for a while, it must be down to her injury also. This needs to be sorted out as the Red Roses cannot afford to miss so many conversions at this stage of the tournament. Perhaps Helena should be getting more opportunity.
Do England have a backline?
well done Lady's, Great game.
They play as tough as they look.
Well done ladies. Great fight and want to win. Thank you all.
Yeah. Cynthia. I keep strong all week.
Perfect rugby conditions
What does the commentator mean by awful weather, this is the best rugby weather in NZ
I think that issue to sick to world is different from years ago due to technology and automation.
Nobody can stop this Ingerlund pack. This is the way.
Yeah. I want to thank you trusting me on that.
Well the Kangabies got steamrollered.
Of course, now Eng are being pilloried for relying on their forward power. Remember 1991 WC Final v Aus? Eng changed their style and lost to an Aus side who used them. Another own goal. Don't listen girls. Stick to what you do best!
Aussie try shouldn't have stood,kick off didn't go 10yds
Incorrect. It crossed the ten metre line on the bounce, before Australia caught the bounce about a metre past the ten metre line.
Locie. Casey should panic, due to the fact she building a rugby team out of bake sales.
England won despite the efforts of Harrison and Infante. Why England left their best scrum half at home is stupidly. Thank goodness for the power of their scrum and lineout.
Your spot on dude👍👍👍. Leaving Mo at home is simply insane.
@@jonchess8844 Totally agree Mo must be gutted not to be there. Always been a class act and never overawed in any game I've ever seen.
Simon Middleton wants the game to be managed by 10 and 12 not by the scrum half - Mo Hunt's style hence he picked Leanne and Lucy and having Claudia as well (similar style to Mo but more versatile). I think that Leanne is a terrific 9 and Lucy has played well and will get better.
The England backs must be dying of loneliness, the front five do it all
The back line was very much involved in the game yesterday. The fact that they didn’t make the points is simply a reflection of the conditions. A great team wins according to what they see in front of them, and today’s game was always going to be a forwards’ game. This team has shown, on many occasions, the strength and speed of their back line. You don’t win 29 games in a row by being a one trick pony.
Oh, and out of England’s seven tries, only one was scored by the front five. Five came from the back row and one from a winger.
Of course, it was pissing down with rain. Ideal weather to highlight the quality of the England pack!
@@langdalepaul some would say a great team plays according to how much they're paid
@@rabbitss11 for the life of me I can’t work out what you’re implying, but it seems you’re intent on belittling the achievement of the team. I can only think you have an axe to grind.
@@langdalepaul no axe just facts
39-5 😳
Easy win.
Um. Under disaster situations, um. Socialized emergency protocols. Cuba as training base.
Just seems no one can compete with this forward pack
Wales can
Is this world cup rugby????? Not many people watching it. Non league English football gets a bigger crowd....
Nobody attends sporting events anywhere these days.
Most things are computer access. And needs little physical ability.
Said before a million times. I want England to win SO much but,,, The Black Ferns will lift the cup unfortunately.
They will get a prize for the best Haka no doubt.
Their only use for backs is on defence😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
No. I don't believe in socialized medicine. Because the unions need something bargain. And under unionized medicine, it's more regulated.
England should just play with no backline
Just don’t look right woman’s rugby sorry not for me
This competition is a joke, England is the only team who have a full team of professionals ,their playing against dinner ladies 😆
AWWW suck it up. It is not our fault you cant organise yourselves.
Not true.
It's not England's fault that they have to play against amateurs, they have set a new Standard for Women's rugby dragging it into the 21st century kicking and screaming, the other teams must now either go professional or accept defeat at every game, I would even argue that it's unfair on England to have to keep playing amateurs all the time as it's holding them back from developing much further,
Most of the Rugby Unions have the money to spend developing their women's side the sooner they invest in their teams the sooner the games will improve drawing bigger crowds more sponsors, the women’s games in England have exploded in the last couple of years and the size of the crowds are doubling year on year, to the point where the RedRoses are going to play their first fully independent test at England's flagship rugby stadium with pretty much all tickets put up for sale sold out already, England's money loss funding the RedRoses is shrinking each year and is at the point where in the next couple of years they will make a profit, most Unions can do this if they want to spend the money. They are the ones damaging women's rugby by holding it back.
That's just not true, there's 4 countries with professional teams and another four that have professional players in them.
@@hetrodoxly1203 He has hurty feelings.
Gee, England score via pushover tries, how innovative and entertaining.
The highlights didn't show how England manage to get so close to the try line.
When you are within inches of the line and the weather is terrible why risk it going through wet hands?
A win is a win, I bet the Aussies wouldn't have minded winning by push over tries..
I bet your a salty jock , sound like a jock with that comment
Suck it up. You saw a masterclass in wet weather rugby. Before you make a stupid comment about Rugby first learn a bit about it.
You don't know much about rugby, eh Alun?
I agree, some of the most exciting women's Rugby ever.
No matter how much people try to big women's rugby league and Union up, and no matter how good the English team currently are against their counterparts , no one is interested or wants to watch it
If that was the case then Womans World Cup rugby wouldn't have lasted as long as it has Mr ball bags.
5 months later England's Red Roses beat France at Twickenham in front of a 58,498 fans, despite the match being shown live on BBC. Maybe you should reconsider
So why are you watching and commenting?
Alf ramseys rugby wingless wonders win again !
You would need a couple of the ladies from the swimming team out of on the wings in those conditions! 😁😁
Stick to football as you seem to know nothing about Rugby.
rugby is lost ,bias ref and side judges killing the game in men and woman rugby , its so sad
What do you mean bias?
There's no bias with England getting to the five yard line, over and over again.
There's no bias in a 30 match winning streak.
I don't now what game you were watching. I think you are just anpther poor little loser.
Side judges ? And you are claiming bias with that sort of in-depth knowledge of the game .
When I played rugby, mauls such as in today's game were totally illegal. It's legalized obstruction. I don't know exactly when the law changed, but in the early and mid 2000s, teams employing this tactic started to get away with it, with players ahead of the ball carrier. That needs to change back to the old law. Very simply, a ball carrier could have teammates bind on behind and shove him/her forward. No teammate could be in front of the ball carrier. The ball carrier's back would face the opposition, and if the maul was stopped, then the player attempted to get the ball back to an acting scrum half or scrum half.
Mauls have always been a thing in international rugby.
Not exactly feminine are they.
Well that has nothing to do with anything.
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 Yes it does it means they are munters.
@@peterchessell28 Which also has nothing to do with anything...
@@amireallythatgrumpy6508 it means that they find it harder to get shagged.
@@peterchessell28 Which still has nothing to do with anything. Nobody actually cares about that anymore anyway.
Butch, lesbeen, transgender rugby, now that is entertainment.Not
Even watching the highlights makes me 🤢 🤕 🤮
Well done, you win TH-cam's stupid comment of the day award.
@@faniecremer4899 Then dont watch. Jeez how dumb.
One day you might say something intelligent. Today is not the day.
Married with children!!