🗣 My numbers are as follows: TYT UV8000D: Frequency High Low -------------------------------------------------------------- 140.000 9.22W 6.03W 142.725 9.84W 6.03W 143.500 9.98W 6.05W 146.355 10.40W 6.23W 440.525 10.50W 5.73W 442.000 9.86W 5.68W 446.252 9.57W 5.58W Another favorite of mine, the Baofeng BF-H6, pulled down these numbers: Frequency HIGH MED LOW ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 140.000 8.76W 3.55W .857W 142.725 8.74W 3.67W .94W 143.500 8.71W 3.73W .968W 146.355 8.74W 3.90W 1.0W 440.525 8.53W 4.38W 1.35W 442.000 8.55W 4.38W 1.35W 446.252 8.52W 4.27W 1.32W The H6 is the best Baofeng radio ever made. And both radios are superb. I'd like to see you do range tests with these radios. I wish the H6/H7 radios would have flashlights as they really are useful. 🌞🌛✨
I did some range tests. On simplex, whip ant to rubber duck (paired with a Retevis RT85), the maximum clear range is about 11kms, and the farthest aerial ant I could hit is about 40kms. I live in an elevated semi-urban area and the farthest aerial ant I communicated with is in the metropolitan.
The H series from Baofeng is completly underrated!! H5, H6 and H7 are awesome radios... But those TYT uv8000D or the uv98plus or even the uv99 and uv58 are just better to be honest😊
@@dimebagtribute » Yes, I love the repeater function on the TYT TH-8000D and it's one reason I recommend them. Don't have any experience with the UV-99 or UV-58. I love the H6 and H7 radios, but I wish someone would do range tests with 5W, 8W and 10W radios. My Radtel RT-470s, I may have said, put out 13-14W on HIGH, which is incredible. They are the most powerful HTs I have, plus they have 3600mAh batteries.
@@johnroberts6695 Yes I put the Radtel 470 on meter and that's what I found with a full battery as well... That's a pretty good radio, you should take a look at the Retevis ra89, it's powerful and have a very clean ransmission, also a very good unit to test👍
🗣 My numbers are as follows:
TYT UV8000D:
Frequency High Low
--------------------------------------------------------------
140.000 9.22W 6.03W
142.725 9.84W 6.03W
143.500 9.98W 6.05W
146.355 10.40W 6.23W
440.525 10.50W 5.73W
442.000 9.86W 5.68W
446.252 9.57W 5.58W
Another favorite of mine, the Baofeng BF-H6, pulled down these numbers:
Frequency HIGH MED LOW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
140.000 8.76W 3.55W .857W
142.725 8.74W 3.67W .94W
143.500 8.71W 3.73W .968W
146.355 8.74W 3.90W 1.0W
440.525 8.53W 4.38W 1.35W
442.000 8.55W 4.38W 1.35W
446.252 8.52W 4.27W 1.32W
The H6 is the best Baofeng radio ever made. And both radios are superb.
I'd like to see you do range tests with these radios. I wish the H6/H7 radios would have flashlights as they really are useful. 🌞🌛✨
I did some range tests. On simplex, whip ant to rubber duck (paired with a Retevis RT85), the maximum clear range is about 11kms, and the farthest aerial ant I could hit is about 40kms. I live in an elevated semi-urban area and the farthest aerial ant I communicated with is in the metropolitan.
The H series from Baofeng is completly underrated!! H5, H6 and H7 are awesome radios... But those TYT uv8000D or the uv98plus or even the uv99 and uv58 are just better to be honest😊
@@dimebagtribute » Yes, I love the repeater function on the TYT TH-8000D and it's one reason I recommend them. Don't have any experience with the UV-99 or UV-58. I love the H6 and H7 radios, but I wish someone would do range tests with 5W, 8W and 10W radios. My Radtel RT-470s, I may have said, put out 13-14W on HIGH, which is incredible. They are the most powerful HTs I have, plus they have 3600mAh batteries.
@@johnroberts6695 Yes I put the Radtel 470 on meter and that's what I found with a full battery as well... That's a pretty good radio, you should take a look at the Retevis ra89, it's powerful and have a very clean ransmission, also a very good unit to test👍