Why are we constantly lied to by the rapturists who state no man knows the day or the hour of the rapture? Jesus said that the heavens would be destroyed... and of THAT DAY no man knows the day or the hour.... not some conjured event fabled to happen 7 years prior to the heavens being destroyed. Jesus was repeating Job 14:12... and the Peter later repeats Christ.. 2 Peter 3:10 and tells us that Jesus comes like a thief in the night when the heavens are destroyed with a great noise.... Thus destroying the flat out lie of a rapture that is presented to occur 7 years prior... suggesting a 7 year countdown to when Jesus would come "like a thief in the night"... 2 Peter 3:10. Every argument for a rapture is birthed out of deception... EVERY single one!
the rapture is one of the biggest lies in the church today. Why would someone want to teach the opposite of Christ? To suggest a rapture is to reject Christ. He directly taught that He comes after the tribulation... Matt 24:29-31. To teach the opposite and suggest that He comes prior is to teach the opposite of Christ. To teach the opposite of Christ is to be antichrist... John tells us that they come from within the church...1 John 2:18,19. We must believe Jesus to be saved. Paul directly called the event 'The Resurrection of the dead'... 1 Cor 15;42-55, which is what he didn't want us ignorant about in 1 Thess 4:13-18. When Paul declares that he is revealing a mystery in verse 50,51, that mystery is how people are changed at the event he directly called "the resurrection of the dead". The terms "rapture" and 'second coming" do not exist in Scripture but were created to divide the "resurrection of the dead" into multiple events. The resurrection of the dead is not some new event revealed by Paul, but declared as early as Job 14:12... where we are told that it occurs when the heavens are destroyed. Jesus references Job in Matt 24;35-43, Mark 13:31,32 and tells us that the heavens will be destroyed and of THAT DAY, no man knows the day or the hour. Peter refers to Christ and tells us that Jesus comes like a thief in the night when the heavens are destroyed with a great noise...2 Peter 3:10. Those martyred for not taking the mark are resurrected at the FIRST resurrection... Rev 20:4-6. These passages destroy the notion of a rapture. Every argument for a rapture is birthed n deception... Every single one!
There is a lot of conjecture about the rapture, the second coming of Jesus, or the resurrection of the dead. Please stick with me, and I will discuss pre- and post-tribulation views on this.
@@cmruff2 Jesus, Peter and Paul all warn us about the deception surrounding His return... Matt 24:3,4, 2 Peter 3:15-17, 2 Thess 2:1-3. Therefore it is not a matter of interpretation or conjecture, but all out deception as the Word of God declares. Answer this question: In Peter's warning referenced above...Why does Peter pinpoint Paul's teaching on this subject as the deciding factor of "wicked" rather than his own, or Christ's or John's teaching? You start you video by telling us that you do not know the Word of God.... why are you looking for me to 'stick with you'?
@@cmruff2 You have questions to answer.... not a "follow me" and I will discuss.... Either Pretrib.. prewrath, posttrib... they all end with the term "rapture".... that term was created for the purpose of division, redirection, and deception. Paul directly called the event "the resurrection of the dead"...1 Cor 15:42... which is what he didn't want us ignorant about in 1 Thess 4:13-18, because the Sadducees taught that there was no resurrection of the dead... Acts 23:8, Matt 19. Every argument for a rapture is birthed out of deception. Even the term rapture is deceptive... and major views cannot present their narrative without it
![[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Grand Final - EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WvObMc9VelI/mqdefault.jpg)
Why are we constantly lied to by the rapturists who state no man knows the day or the hour of the rapture? Jesus said that the heavens would be destroyed... and of THAT DAY no man knows the day or the hour.... not some conjured event fabled to happen 7 years prior to the heavens being destroyed. Jesus was repeating Job 14:12... and the Peter later repeats Christ.. 2 Peter 3:10 and tells us that Jesus comes like a thief in the night when the heavens are destroyed with a great noise.... Thus destroying the flat out lie of a rapture that is presented to occur 7 years prior... suggesting a 7 year countdown to when Jesus would come "like a thief in the night"... 2 Peter 3:10. Every argument for a rapture is birthed out of deception... EVERY single one!
the rapture is one of the biggest lies in the church today.
Why would someone want to teach the opposite of Christ?
To suggest a rapture is to reject Christ. He directly taught that He comes after the tribulation... Matt 24:29-31. To teach the opposite and suggest that He comes prior is to teach the opposite of Christ. To teach the opposite of Christ is to be antichrist... John tells us that they come from within the church...1 John 2:18,19. We must believe Jesus to be saved.
Paul directly called the event 'The Resurrection of the dead'... 1 Cor 15;42-55, which is what he didn't want us ignorant about in 1 Thess 4:13-18. When Paul declares that he is revealing a mystery in verse 50,51, that mystery is how people are changed at the event he directly called "the resurrection of the dead". The terms "rapture" and 'second coming" do not exist in Scripture but were created to divide the "resurrection of the dead" into multiple events.
The resurrection of the dead is not some new event revealed by Paul, but declared as early as Job 14:12... where we are told that it occurs when the heavens are destroyed. Jesus references Job in Matt 24;35-43, Mark 13:31,32 and tells us that the heavens will be destroyed and of THAT DAY, no man knows the day or the hour. Peter refers to Christ and tells us that Jesus comes like a thief in the night when the heavens are destroyed with a great noise...2 Peter 3:10. Those martyred for not taking the mark are resurrected at the FIRST resurrection... Rev 20:4-6. These passages destroy the notion of a rapture. Every argument for a rapture is birthed n deception... Every single one!
There is a lot of conjecture about the rapture, the second coming of Jesus, or the resurrection of the dead. Please stick with me, and I will discuss pre- and post-tribulation views on this.
@@cmruff2 Jesus, Peter and Paul all warn us about the deception surrounding His return... Matt 24:3,4, 2 Peter 3:15-17, 2 Thess 2:1-3. Therefore it is not a matter of interpretation or conjecture, but all out deception as the Word of God declares. Answer this question: In Peter's warning referenced above...Why does Peter pinpoint Paul's teaching on this subject as the deciding factor of "wicked" rather than his own, or Christ's or John's teaching?
You start you video by telling us that you do not know the Word of God.... why are you looking for me to 'stick with you'?
@@cmruff2 You have questions to answer.... not a "follow me" and I will discuss.... Either Pretrib.. prewrath, posttrib... they all end with the term "rapture".... that term was created for the purpose of division, redirection, and deception. Paul directly called the event "the resurrection of the dead"...1 Cor 15:42... which is what he didn't want us ignorant about in 1 Thess 4:13-18, because the Sadducees taught that there was no resurrection of the dead... Acts 23:8, Matt 19. Every argument for a rapture is birthed out of deception. Even the term rapture is deceptive... and major views cannot present their narrative without it
@RandyRoth-mo3lz I did not say that I do not know the Word of God. I said that I am not an ordained minister/pastor.