It's never like that bro. Only difference is you came here because you wanted and you went to college because your parents wanted. It's all about will to learn brother.
@@b10gaming2 yea but still his teaching is clear from the beginning, unlike some teachers... in order to understand them you need to ask and ask and ask, it's like searching for the logic behind it and tbh it's tiring. but yeah will is as important
I have always wondered where can I apply the redundancy theorem back in boolean algebra and now it's getting clear that it is actually used for logic minimization. Thank you as always, Neso Academy!
Thank you so much for this sir . I really appreciate your work . It helped me a lot. Things which i didn't understand in my class i understood it here which is quiet astonishing.
i just wanna say thaaat u by far r the greatest teacher i hv ever listened to and understood evry single thing and concept.So thank u for givin ur time to teach young mind like us.Love yaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!1
This neso academy is very special for me. I got two times backlogs in this subject because of my fucking subjects teacher. But now my all doubts cleared. Very Thankful
Who is here in 2024-25 after 10 years of uploading this video. nothing to say but so thankful for this helpful video for engineering students, you know well one day before exam
Thankyou so much sir im in class 11th and due to jee preparation i dont get time for computer tutions u always save me a night before my computer exams ✨
at 7:35 you said that there are two ways to combine that "1".Why dont you combine that ""1" in both ways? That way ill have four implicants in one equation. (i+ii+iii+iii') Why not?
Awesome i am really learning the syllabus of engineering being in diplamo 1st sem.......i just hope it will really help me in future to copup with pu students in my engineering 😊😊😅
SIR YOU DID NOT EXPLAIN WHY we did not add I + II + III + IV. In the earlier example we did share a 1 b/w 2 pairs, you should explicitly explain why we didn't do that with Boolean Algebra reasoning
The main goal of K-maps is to avoid having to use Boolean algebra. Sure, in some cases it may be easy to simplify an expression and feel confident that you have likely reduced it as much as possible, but that might not be the case with longer expressions. The number of simplifications would be too many to consider. Instead, K-maps give us a shortcut that, when done correctly, gives us the fully simplified answer.
when we include both the you see that redundancy theorem will cut down to again F=1+2+3 since F=1+2+3+3' see 1,3 and 3' you can apply redundancy theorem
3:23 - isn't it F=ab + a(complement)c + c ? Because at the end, that BC is only C in my opinion because B is changing from 0->1 on the horizontal; so we neglect it, right? I'm waiting for a reply. Thanks.
+Vlad Grama I understand it now. Sorry for asking, i was a bit confused. It's ok the way you did it because the direction of BC is vertical and on that direction, the only one changing is variable A. Outstanding job!! I would like you to be the one that teaches me these things :)).
"i have been fascinated by how prevalent this bullshit idea is around the concept of, that to be successful in life it's about hard work", i get this ad whenever I watch your video haha!!
Sir can you please tell me that in the last example can i write 3 and 3' pair of ones together or i have to use only one pair and to neglect one of the pair??? Please clear my doubt sir ... If you don't understand my question tell me i will again try to ask in simple way
you are awsome, you just taught me the things in one night that my course tutor could not for approx 2 months . Thank you.
It's never like that bro. Only difference is you came here because you wanted and you went to college because your parents wanted. It's all about will to learn brother.
@@b10gaming2 true bro the important thing is will
@@b10gaming2 yea but still his teaching is clear from the beginning, unlike some teachers... in order to understand them you need to ask and ask and ask, it's like searching for the logic behind it and tbh it's tiring. but yeah will is as important
I have always wondered where can I apply the redundancy theorem back in boolean algebra and now it's getting clear that it is actually used for logic minimization. Thank you as always, Neso Academy!
seriously I can not thank you enough for this an amazing explanation .
thank you is nothing in front of your work. you had literally done great work for us. so so so so much greatful.
your teaching skills are awesome ... and feels really easy to understand, the concept.
Thank you so much for this sir . I really appreciate your work . It helped me a lot. Things which i didn't understand in my class i understood it here which is quiet astonishing.
i just wanna say thaaat u by far r the greatest teacher i hv ever listened to and understood evry single thing and concept.So thank u for givin ur time to teach young mind like us.Love yaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!1
Fantastic work man... Keep up the great work......And you were right..no one teaches k map so exhaustively!!
This came out 6 years ago... Thnk you very much...
This neso academy is very special for me. I got two times backlogs in this subject because of my fucking subjects teacher. But now my all doubts cleared. Very Thankful
I am watching all your lectures one by one
I turned off my adblocker to watch your videos :)
Who is here in 2024-25 after 10 years of uploading this video. nothing to say but so thankful for this helpful video for engineering students, you know well one day before exam
Thankyou so much sir im in class 11th and due to jee preparation i dont get time for computer tutions u always save me a night before my computer exams ✨
At 8:08 why |||' .... Why not |v
??????
the best explanation ever tbh !!
thank you, thank you, thank you .............
How can I thanks for your help. No words bro.. 👍👍
Very good lectures it Clears all my doubts.
Hey thanks for covering the redundancy type of example.
i just hope my lecturer could explain like the way you does it.
How c is c at 9:19 in my opinion it is changing so why c is c
at 7:35 you said that there are two ways to combine that "1".Why dont you combine that ""1" in both ways? That way ill have four implicants in one equation. (i+ii+iii+iii') Why not?
I have the same question
@@jugszy :)
Even if you combine all four, f will reduce to (A'B'+B'C+AB) using redundancy theorem.
@@ANUJKUMAR-ys6dy so what to use both iii & iii' or any one ?
you are awsome. much better then our lecturer.
thanks!
Sir in before lecture u said a single one can be paired more than once
Awesome i am really learning the syllabus of engineering being in diplamo 1st sem.......i just hope it will really help me in future to copup with pu students in my engineering 😊😊😅
First many thanks for your effort, I'd like to add that Red. Theo. is similar or same with Consensus theorem
at 3:34 it is consensus theorem
SIR YOU DID NOT EXPLAIN WHY we did not add I + II + III + IV. In the earlier example we did share a 1 b/w 2 pairs, you should explicitly explain why we didn't do that with Boolean Algebra reasoning
The main goal of K-maps is to avoid having to use Boolean algebra. Sure, in some cases it may be easy to simplify an expression and feel confident that you have likely reduced it as much as possible, but that might not be the case with longer expressions. The number of simplifications would be too many to consider. Instead, K-maps give us a shortcut that, when done correctly, gives us the fully simplified answer.
You are the Best, Thank you!
can I straight away combine both cases to one function in 2nd example?
Thanks a lot.. all my doubts vanished😊
Bht Acha smjh aya hai🥰
Shouldn't we consider both three and three dash in the last example while finding the formula for F?
when we include both the you see that redundancy theorem will cut down to again F=1+2+3 since F=1+2+3+3' see 1,3 and 3' you can apply redundancy theorem
You are a God Sir!
Why does it feel like he made the redundancy theorem on his own just to prove his point😂😂
Love your work though!
Thank you,I got it from this ❤
Thanks Neso❤️
Sir in the last example how you take (III) and (III)'.
Is this is wrong (A'B'+B'C+AC+AB)
As per redundancy theorem, final expression will be A'B'+B'C+AB
🤝
@@aakashparikh4774 🤝
U stop pairing when all ones are paired
@@aryashah1890 oh.then why didnt he mention this in the lecture?
Thank you so much for this amazing piece of work,Made me understand everything clearly
Thank you so much sir!!❤️❤️
3:23 - isn't it F=ab + a(complement)c + c ? Because at the end, that BC is only C in my opinion because B is changing from 0->1 on the horizontal; so we neglect it, right? I'm waiting for a reply. Thanks.
+Vlad Grama I understand it now. Sorry for asking, i was a bit confused. It's ok the way you did it because the direction of BC is vertical and on that direction, the only one changing is variable A. Outstanding job!! I would like you to be the one that teaches me these things :)).
बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद
Love you 3000 sir 😎😎😎
nice one
it would be nice if you have a playlist of these videos on ur channel please
We can make the lower combination as a single to yield Abar bbar +a as a whole
Why make 3rd pair ?
btw thank you this an amazing explanation
Very nice lecture
Thanks Sir 😀😀
Sir?? in the 1st example for II have no 1 (1,3,6,7) at a time 1:23 I thnik you did wrong
+BEK BALCHA + no he isn't wrong .
Bek, you may have your cells numbered wrong, ..a good rule of thumb....the outside vertical cells are even #'s and the inside vertical cells are odd
It starts from 0.
So 0/1/3/2
4/5/7/6
So it is correct!
You solved my 8 cell k map problem thanks ❤️alot
Sir really awasome
How should I thank you?
I watch the whole ad
thx a lot for this lecture..
9:56 which one do we pick the F on the left or the one on the right
lol i know u posted this a year ago but if you know it by now pls tell me
In first example you didn't take two different conditions then y u take two different conditions for second example.
7:16
Can we combine the remaining 1 with the other two in the bottom row? Like, instead of grouping two 1's we can group three 1's?
Thats not possible, because the following rules of pairing 1's ( 2, 4 8, 16)
2:27 "then you will find out it is actually ______" What is he saying there?
+David Cook OH!!! He is saying redundant!
@@davidcook4823 yeah it is
Thanks will do more exersize on this
"i have been fascinated by how prevalent this bullshit idea is around the concept of, that to be successful in life it's about hard work", i get this ad whenever I watch your video haha!!
In the second example which answer will we prefer? Or we will solve it with both the possibilities?
Yes , in which way we should do ? Or in both way
20 years looking this calculation
But how to know where to use complements and where to not use complements while writing solution
in the second sum what happens if we pair the one by itself?
should we not include all 4 combinations in one go only..
no we have to avoid the repeated numbers as much possible.
we repeat somewhere to cover the left ones only.
@@KumarAcademy need some more explanation
Sir, why you didn't consider all 4 implicants at a time?
if you use both now consider the redundancy theorem for I, III, and III' (AB + AC + B'C = AB + B'C)
now AC i.e, III will be eliminated
@@pavankumarvancha7576 so AB+B'C is the correct ans??
Thankyou so much
sir when we solve this by canonical form then converting to minimal form we get only second case,why are answers different in two cases?
A'B' = (AB)'
And A+A'=1
So the 1st eqn can be minimized into AC+B'C.
Is this wrong?
No A'B'= (A+B) ' DeMorgan' s theorem
In last question , is both answer are correct??
YES
Why we dont use both III and III` together in one expression??
if you use both now consider the redundancy theorem for I, III, and III' (AB + AC + B'C = AB + B'C)
now AC i.e, III will be eliminated
Yeah... U thaught me well but a little confused with the last answer and reason... So could u explain again.?
thank you
sir why aren't we pair these 4
Same doubt
Awesome explanation, but still cant get my doubt cleared :(
Sir can you please tell me that in the last example can i write 3 and 3' pair of ones together or i have to use only one pair and to neglect one of the pair???
Please clear my doubt sir
...
If you don't understand my question tell me i will again try to ask in simple way
do u find the answer?
sir how do we decide that we have to write A or A dash while solving the last part of the question
thanks a lot
The last one has a function A'B' +ABC ...this is the final answer,
how to decide that we have to complement the variable or not while writing down the function?
Its written in Sop format so,here 0's are complemented and 1 is not. Hope this is clear
What Is the answer for second example ? There 2 possibilities are coming naa?
I was wondering why didn't you use red. theorem on the previous example
When pairing we use only +sign to connect the pairs?
Thank u so much..
very important
Thanks man...
thank u brother
Sir in the last example BOTH (III) and (III) are considered correct ? we can choose either when solving the problem, right ?
Bro why we are separating them as III & III'?? can't we take III' as IV
@@karthikm1674 did you get your answer , if yes tell me too
Thanks a lot
Please help me with this : f1=sum(0,1,2,3,5,8,10,14)+sum(don't care)(4,6,7) ,f2=sum(0,3,4,5)+sum(don't care)(6,7,9),determine h=f1+f2 and g=f1*f2
If normal algebra is English then boolean algebra is Spanish
How are you labeling the boxes? As far as I know, they should be numbered from 1-8. My 1's are not lining up the way you're showing
Neso Academy I just did, and now it makes sense. Thanks for following up.
why are you contradicting yourself in the very first lecture you said "1" can be groped more than once , but here you are saying we cant .
I am confused why he placed A there and not C.
why we dont take iii" together with the first equation??
Sir how do u choose which pair/implicant will be pair I, pair II, or pair III ? Can i assign randomly ?
Johnwyn Michael De Vera yes... commutativity
Johnwyn Michael De Vera which one is the right answer.
but i can make any of the part as my first group like the first one right?
in first example how BC was removed?
for the people who watch and go without liking the video : you people are the real demons in this real world
Sir .. do you have another type for naming k map
Sir how will we come to know that in last expression where complement is needed and where it is not
in SOP 0 is complement and 1 is not