As a beginner, this was a little fast for me. I can pause the video and rewind, that's not a problem. But I was left wondering why we were doing certain things. I haven't used patterns before at all, so this was enlightening still. Thanks for the video
Thanks for the comment. It's difficult to find the right balance between pacing for beginners and making each piece of content concise. I do have a chaptered out video that covers all the fundimentals th-cam.com/video/Odr5viqPwkc/w-d-xo.html I can answer any additional questions you have if you have any specifics
Beautiful approach to creating the bristles! FreeCAD never ceases to amaze me with the robustness of some of it features like the dropping of the excess pattern instances or transforms. Maybe precisely because it is so flimsy in other areas because of the topo naming issue. When realthunder's branch gets merged into the main realease it will be a serious contender in the CAD space. If they ever make the decision to have a single assembly workbench with a more straightforward projection for top down modeling... Many CAD systems will be very much afraid. From large and small developers alike.
I was wondering why as well. Surely American viewers can cope with millimetres on occasion. Especially when it makes the numbers more reasonable to type.
Hi, Thank you very much for sharing your expertice! I don´t know where to ask the next question, so I apologise: Having a spreadsheet with data in a matrix, how can I do an array so each item of it pulls its own value from the spreadsheet. Example: having a circle that is multiplied n times with the array, I would like to constrain each one with a specific radius pulled from the spreadsheet. I know that with the multitransform tool I can do a scaled array, but it uses a fixed scale. thank you very much!!!
I would sure like that! I get a lot of people asking to not use hotkeys, so I try to keep it somewhat standard to not confuse viewers. But If I were to set my own, I would put everything on the left hand to make it as two handed as possible, focusing on sketch constraints. I loved how the hotkeys used to be, so out of habit and the sheer brilliance of how they were setup, I would use a similar setup to what existed. My main ones would be- h-horizontal v-vertical shift+h-horizontal dimension shift+v-Vertical dimension e-equal s-symmetry r-radius e-extrude r-radius
The kind of project that would make my old machine catch fire 🤣... Love it...
As a beginner, this was a little fast for me. I can pause the video and rewind, that's not a problem. But I was left wondering why we were doing certain things. I haven't used patterns before at all, so this was enlightening still. Thanks for the video
Thanks for the comment. It's difficult to find the right balance between pacing for beginners and making each piece of content concise. I do have a chaptered out video that covers all the fundimentals
th-cam.com/video/Odr5viqPwkc/w-d-xo.html
I can answer any additional questions you have if you have any specifics
Beautiful approach to creating the bristles! FreeCAD never ceases to amaze me with the robustness of some of it features like the dropping of the excess pattern instances or transforms. Maybe precisely because it is so flimsy in other areas because of the topo naming issue.
When realthunder's branch gets merged into the main realease it will be a serious contender in the CAD space. If they ever make the decision to have a single assembly workbench with a more straightforward projection for top down modeling... Many CAD systems will be very much afraid. From large and small developers alike.
Awesome Freecad videos mate. Learning a lot from your content 👌especially design intent different ways to approach designs.
Suggestion, Anki Deck with FreeCAD keyboard shortcuts, etc. Love your tutorials.
I literally was planning to draw one this week, that’s kinda a crazy coincidence on such a random object
I know, in some countries are different measurements, in, cm, etc ... but what is a sense type 6.49609 in instead of 165 mm ?? .... ??
I was wondering why as well.
Surely American viewers can cope with millimetres on occasion. Especially when it makes the numbers more reasonable to type.
Can you make a basic tutorial for draft workbench
Hi, Thank you very much for sharing your expertice! I don´t know where to ask the next question, so I apologise: Having a spreadsheet with data in a matrix, how can I do an array so each item of it pulls its own value from the spreadsheet. Example: having a circle that is multiplied n times with the array, I would like to constrain each one with a specific radius pulled from the spreadsheet. I know that with the multitransform tool I can do a scaled array, but it uses a fixed scale. thank you very much!!!
Thanks for your comment. Would this be the content you're looking for?
th-cam.com/video/Jze6ftGc6BQ/w-d-xo.html
Thank you!!! Not at all. I will try to do a video explaining what I need. Regards@@JokoEngineeringhelp
You should take a couple minutes to set all the hotkeys as you like. They’re configurable. Share your hotkeys.
I would sure like that! I get a lot of people asking to not use hotkeys, so I try to keep it somewhat standard to not confuse viewers. But If I were to set my own, I would put everything on the left hand to make it as two handed as possible, focusing on sketch constraints. I loved how the hotkeys used to be, so out of habit and the sheer brilliance of how they were setup, I would use a similar setup to what existed. My main ones would be-
h-horizontal
v-vertical
shift+h-horizontal dimension
shift+v-Vertical dimension
e-equal
s-symmetry
r-radius
e-extrude
r-radius
@@JokoEngineeringhelp I’m a vim person, so I know all about the importance of good keybindings. :)
@@BobWidlefish Ah yes! Although I'm not a VIM person, I believe from the linuxmemes subreddit, I should ask you how to exit VIM haha
There are a few bristels poking through the handle. How can they be removed?
Part>Defeaturing would be the easiest bet.
Great,,
A hair brush bristle dimension to a millionth of an inch might be a bit overkill.
This was made too long ago so I don't recall to what you are referring. It was probably to avoid a rounding error or previous unit conversion.