British Couple Reacts to The Terrifying True Scale of Nuclear Weapons
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 มี.ค. 2023
- British Couple Reacts to The Terrifying True Scale of Nuclear Weapons
Check out our Merch! - the-beesleys-merch-shop.creat...
Support the Channel on Patreon - / beesley
If you would like to Donate VIA Paypal to our Wedding Fund - paypal.me/thebeesleyswedding?...
P.O Box -
FAO: James Beesley
The Good Egg Farmers
P.O Box 19
JERSEY
JE4 9NH
Thank you so much for watching this reaction video!
Please smash that like button and subscribe!
Discord - / discord
Twitter - / beesleyyt
Original Video - • The Terrifying True Sc...
Comment below more reaction ideas or DM me on Twitter!
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. - บันเทิง
![Teacher Reacts To "The Terrifying True Scale of Nuclear Weapons" [DISGUSTING]](/img/n.gif)
I am not so afraid of being at ground zero, but the slow drawn-out death by radiation poisoning while watching everyone around me die sounds like one of the worst ways to go.
Hence why the best way to go would be at the epicenter of it
It depends on the size of the blast, and employment method used on whether or not you would suffer radiation sickness. It sounds weird, but the larger the blast, the less radiation poisoning happens to the survivors. Mostly because the blast wave is larger than the range of radiation poisoning. Smaller tactical nukes theoretically will produce more radiation poisoning casualties than strategic. Next is was the device air burst, surface burst, or subsurface burst. Air burst will produce less fallout and the radiation dissipates quicker. Subsurface produces the most fallout and tends to stay around longer.
If you haven't already, watch the movie "The Road". While it isn't specified what is the cause of the post-apocalyptic condition in the film, it could be a nuclear war. In any case, the film is the most depressing, scary, horrifying film on that subject I've ever seen.
@@jasonrichardson1999 plus you can make a funny shadow that gets photographed on a wall lol
I live about 30 minutes south of Peterson Airforce Base in colorado Springs. That is a primary target for any nuclear attack. I will drive there, use my never expiring military ID to gain access and the park my car right outside of the missile command center. I will lay out on the hood of my car and wait for the flash. I will not feel a thing. I won't starve to death or die slowly from radiation poisoning. I will be gone instantly. There is no reason to worry yourself sick about it. You have no control over it. It's like worrying about the sun going super nova. Or the sun coming up in the morning. Hopefully cool heads prevail. If not, I will get to watch God throw all the people who caused this destruction of the human race get thrown into the lane of fire. I will bring the coffee. Some one will have to bring the coffee cake.
Nuclear deterrence is a real thing. It's kinda confusing but it works. A lot of countries don't dare do anything super extreme because of it.
MAD is a thing too. Mutually Assured Destruction.
@@13r12ad It used to be. The pentagon abandoned that policy years ago. Fact.
@@guyindecatur Wrong country. The only country threatening use of nuclear weapons is the russian butchers regime.
@@guyindecatur Really? Who did they nuke when that happened?
Mutually Assured Destruction
I think it’s good you two watched this. As a child of the Cold War, I grew up under the threat of nuclear war and learned everything I could about it.
I grew up during the height of the Cold War and lived with fifteen mile of five primary targets.
The threat's actually worse now than it's ever been, and has been for some time. Well before Putin was sabre-rattling over his fascist invasion of Ukraine; North Korea's Kims are a big threat, as is the ever-dicey situation between India and Pakistan. Add the lack of security around a lot of these weapons and materials, and it's not great. We just don't talk about it much anymore, for some reason.
Don't forget kids: Duck and Cover!
I have Nightmares about it since in 2022
Millie, I just turned 70 and lived through the Cuban Missile Crisis. That was the closest we have ever come to nuclear war. President Kennedy overruled the American military and did not invade Cuba. We did not know that the Russians had already established nuclear missile sites in Cuba and were under orders to fire the missiles if Cuba was invaded.
Able Archer ‘83 is arguably the closest we ever came to a total nuclear war. In 1983 the Soviets had a dead hand system in place to launch if the US launched a nuclear attack. Before going online, it was decided to keep a human in the loop for safety reasons. During the NATO Able Archer exercise in 1983, a Soviet satellite thought it detected a launch and started going off. The watch officer thought it was a false alarm and ignored it. It then continued to go off for multiple suspected launches, to which the watch officer thought was an error in the system. He refused to launch in return (which is what he was supposed to do). In the following investigation, the glare of the sun off of a high altitude cloud at just the right angle was giving the dead hand system false launch detections. The watch officer, who was correct in not launching, was later kicked out of the Soviet Army. Ironically it was for not launching.
@@KNETTWERX you are correct. While the Cuban Missile Crisis was bad enough, it's highly unlikely they would have launched. Not going into Cuba is part of the reason JFK was assassinated. He turned down the idea of a false flag attack on Southern us soil and on US owned assets in Cuba as put forward as a plan by The Joint Chiefs. Then he gave his famous speech about the hidden powers and secret societies and so on and so forth and was assassinated for all of it.
@@KNETTWERX
I would disagree. Able Archer would have been the second most dangerous point in the Cold War.
@@ericsierra-franco7802 with the Soviet paranoia, and all the events of 1983, it was a lot closer.
This is so true.
" WE CAN ALL BE FRIENDS , STOP IT. " I agree soo much. 😢❤
Then you are simply ignoring or ignorant to Human Nature.
@@demsandlibsareswinecancer4667 I said I agree. Not that other people do.
@@lauralee83 then by definition we can't all be friends. Guess I'm just tired of the wasted platitudes instead of action
Humanity is doomed war will always happen
As much as I wish it so. That is actually impossible. The world in it's entirety will never be friends. As long as someone has something another wants they will try to take it. Whoever controls the biggest stick controls the flock. Right now it's the US but like all great empires you cannot remain the strongest forever. Our time will come eventually and someone will have a bigger stick. Peace on earth can never happen. It's not that it shouldn't it's that it literally cannot happen. It isn't possible. Everyone always wants more.
"If it happens, we all die together," so comforting yet so dark.💀
There's a nuclear blast scene in the 1991 movie "Terminator 2: Judgement Day". Scientists have said this scene is the most accurate representation of what nuclear blast would like in a populated area.
Let's go mountaineers!
@@jacobreed3424oh no there’s two of you!
We are many, we are legion
which scientists? If an ornithologist says it it doesn't mean nothing but it doesn't carry much weight by itself.
Technically Ukraine Missiles were Soviet Missiles. Ukraine as an independent country didnt have proper Blueprint nor the tech to develop Nukes. These Nukes were deployed in Ukraine cuz well Ukraine was Russia back then. But if Ukraine Kept those Missiles maybe they could develop something from that. Just like a majority of Soviet War Ships were built in Ukraine part. After independence Ukraine kind of slowly forgot developing Hitech war ships.
Welcome to my childhood. In the 80s, a good number of nights were not expected to be followed by mornings. I honestly never thought I'd make it to 50
Don't forget the pentagon abandoned the "no first nuke strike" years ago.
They have been openly discussing first-strike nukes for several years.
@@guyindecatur Ah, pre-emptive war. Thanks Dubya!
@@michaelccozens And a big shout-out to the MIC.
The thing about nuclear war is that there have been thousands of nuclear bombs just sitting around for decades. Worrying about a nuclear war as a civilian is redundant and somewhat stupid. The worse part is the nuclear winter. Just live a productive life and keep the thought out of your head.
I've always said if a nuclear war were to happen, I hope the first one goes off right above me.
Yep. The living will envy the dead.
Britain did all of its nuclear test in the western part of Australia….. there’s a program called trinity, and beyond it shows a lot of the nuclear test by the US…..
You might consider reviewing “The Day After” which portrayed the after effects of a US-USSR nuclear war.
Scared the heck of a lot of people when it came out in 1983
Reagan cited it directly in his signing of nuke treaties in 1987.
The biggest thing that many of these videos about nukes don’t explain is that the power of a bomb and it’s radius of destruction is not linear it actually has diminishing returns and significant at that. The most dangerous part of a nuclear blast has never been the radiation or the blast itself but the huge and uncontrollable fires it would start which would cause the vast majority of the damage. We saw this with the bombing of Hiroshima, most of the direct blast damage wasn’t that significant and relatively few people where killed, it was the huge fires that where started that killed the tens of thousands of people.
I’ve got to disagree. The blast wave from a nuclear weapon does a tremendous amount of damage, and the fires started may or may not coalesce into a firestorm, so the damage from secondary fires may or may not be very damaging. Part of the reason that the Nagasaki bomb, even though it was bigger, did not cause as much damage and loss of life as the Hiroshima bomb was because there was no secondary firestorm at Nagasaki like there was at Hiroshima.
Japanese cities had mainly wooden architecture then.
Assuming, since Millie got that emotional, before the video even started...You guys expecting?
Millie, it would be nice if we could all be friends, but as long as there are tyrants (which there always will be) we have to remain ready to defeat them in any way
Mercy is getting vaporated at ground zero , cause radioactive and ice age aftermatch is insane
There is a film that was made by HBO Pictures called “By Dawn’s Early Light”. It is an amazing, and utterly terrifying film, with an all star cast. Oddly entertaining film as well.
Hi 👋
Mille, there is a saying called mutually assured destruction, aka M.A.D we keep them so no one else can destroy us without them knowing that they themselves will be destroyed
The Pentagon abandoned that policy years ago. 'Net search. They have been openly talking about first-strike nukes for years.
The petro-dollar is under attack as never before. The BRICs are working on an alternative to it.
BTW - the "Six Day War" was "engineered" by Kissinger as an *incremental step* in creating the Petro-dollar.
In 1971 France literally sent a warship to the US to redeem their US dollars for gold. US dollars were flowing into France as a result of the Vietnam war - Vietnam was a former French colony. Nixon then took the US off the gold standard. Footnote - the BS was so deep in the "Six Day War" that Nixon said that his mommy prophesied that one day he would "save" israel.
Yes, they really do think we're (some of us) that stupid.
I've spent over 60 years under the nuclear umbrella -- most of them living in the blast radius of prime targets. That alone offers some solace as I would be spared the burden of surviving a nuclear attack. But that aside, and especially when you see how devasting conventional bombing can be (e.g. Dresden, Tokyo, etc.), you make peace with the idea that, in the end, these are just really big bombs. Some dirty-ass bombs, to be sure, but in the end, they are just quick to deploy bombs (large military forces optional but not required). Honestly, I'm more concerned about the other two legs of the WMD tripod: nerve toxins and biologics.
I dont have your patreon page, but a movie to do on your movie page should be the original "Red Dawn" from 1984. it is a movie that made ppl my age become so patriotic, or at least built onto the patriotic feelings inside. the measured radius of that Tsar bomb on NYC, might be 100 miles, but I am close to the outskirts there in Jersey, and I am about 15-20 miles from NYC as the crow flies across the water.
Red Dawn's fun, but it's the dumbest shit ever. Rewritten by Nixon's hacks. Nicaragua and Cuba invading via Florida? Teleportation's more believable.
Probably shouldn't say 'smash that button' when discussing nukes, lol. But it would only take a few missiles to seriously set back world civilization because of the drifting fallout clouds afterwards ie nuclear winter. Check out the ridiculous 'Duck and Cover" tv advert from the 1950's.
The Acronym for the Nuclear race is apt. M.A.D. Mutually Assured Destruction.
I don't worry about this as we're in NYC and wouldn't have to worry about radiation/starvation etc. No matter, I don't think there's any chance of any nuclear exchange, whatever the media has to say.
You guys have to watch the video *(The Fallen of World War ll)* showing the casualties experience for each country
It's not nuclear bombs that we have to worry about It's chemical weapons. Chemical weapons are way scarier than nuclear ones.
And biological weapons
This wouldn’t even be the fallout map either. A bomb like Tsar Bomba would contaminate most of the eastern seaboard with huge amounts or radiation depending on prevailing winds. Remember this isn’t just the blast but what happens after as everyone forgets about the fallout. Remember Chernobyl as when that blew, radiation went all the way to England and parts of Northern Europe. That’s small compared to a Tsar Bomba too.
Only a few and the masses. It's fear and presentation. The masses are born into it and eat it up. Haha I do recommend watching the trinity and beyond 90s video. The soundtrack is great.
That Russian bomb cover about a 50 mile radius in every direction from NYC,basically Bridgeport Connecticut to palisades mall in Rockland Ny and Freehold New Jersey, all in the circle are vaporized!
Actually, those huge ones were designed to detonate in the upper atmosphere to create a huge EMP blast that would knock out electronics and power over a large area. Nobody would die from the blast.
You guys really need to check out the movie "Dr Strangelove, or: How i learned to stop worrying and love the bomb" the 1964 black comedy by Stanley Kubrick. It has a great cast and, including, I believe, one of James Earl Jones' first roles.
You guys need to watch the movie "The Day After".
There are three types of people when it comes to nukes.
1. Those who have a daily existential crisis about it.
2. Those who just don't worry about it because its out of their control.
3. Those who are sort of like the 2, but also hope it hits near them so they can be instantly incinerated so they dont' have to deal with the aftermath of radiation.
I'm 3. According to the order of what cities would be nuked by Russia. I should be close enough that I would be instantly vaporized. So it will be quick. I have zero interest in surviving a blast.
Don't worry Millie my favorite NASCAR # 21 just got put out of the race.
I think the news is lil Mrs. Beesley is making a brand new Beesley. Am I right? Glowing complexion & emotional. Baby coming about 11/22/2023.
Yeah that's not creepy AF.
@@jdanon203 apparently correct if you watched tonight's stream. Some people are intuitive, others just like to criticize. 😜
It's never gonna come to that, don't worry about it.
Millie is too paranoid already to watch this video lol
BRUH I JUST FOUND OUT THAT IF THE 100MT BOMB WAS DROPPED ON DOVER,UK IT WOULD REACH PAST DUNKIRK, FRANCE
NEVER WORRY ABOUT YOU DONT HAVE CONTROL OVER
It would be terrible, but imagine being an astronaut in the ISS and seeing a mini Sun just appear on the Earth
Check out the redbull space jump it was demonstrated in this video on how high he was when he jumped.
I'm 63 years old, and grew up during the height of the Cold War. I'm sorry she is so fearful, but this how my generation grew up and lived part of our adult lives, with the threat of nuclear war hanging over our heads. I was born in 1959, and the Cold War ended in 1991 with the collapse of the Soviet Union ...that's 32 years of my life living with the hands of the "Doomsday Clock" within just a few minutes of striking midnight. I was 3 years old during the Cuban Missle Crisis in 1962, the closest yet to there being a nuclear war. The video mentioned there being just over 16,000 nuclear weapons currently. However, during my youth and early adulthood (1959-1989), just the United States and the Soviet Union alone had over 30,000 nuclear weapons.
Mate, the Doomsday Clock is closer to midnight now than it's ever been. She's much more of a right to nuclear fears than you, and you shouldn't need to be told that.
@@michaelccozens I've lived under the threat of nuclear war all my life, 63 years. I've seen the "Doomsday Clock" go up and down numerous times, even getting within one minute to Midnight more than once. True, this is the closest it's ever been to Midnight, by 30 seconds from where I've seen it before. Also, there are fewer nuclear warheads now than when I was a child ...in 1967 the US alone had over 30,000, the arsenal is down to under 4,000 currently. How does anyone have more of a right than I, or anyone else of my generation, to fear nuclear war? Because I've lived most of my life? I have two children (ages 37 and 33) and four grandchildren (ages 14 to 2) ...you think I want their lives to end in a nuclear war?
I just want to get my opinion across about Castle Bravo. A blast estimated to be 5.8 megatons turned into an explosion of 13.9 megatons, approximately. They surrounded the bomb with lithium-7 which is an inert material, Unfortunately they didn't realize that within the first millionth of a second of the explosion lithium-7 turns into lithium-6. Lithium-6 is a fissionable material. I just thought maybe you might be interested in looking at the Castle Bravo disaster. It also involves the island of bikini, and yes that's where the bathing suit gets its name from. If you want to see the actual United States atomic energy Commission films on it you can go to a channel on TH-cam called the Atomic Vault. Or you can watch one of the cartoon versions of the accident. They both basically give the same account just one with less details and the actual footage of the incident, an incident which basically made an entire Island disappear off the face of the Earth. Thank you and thumbs up, now I have to finish watching the rest of your video. Disclaimer; I can guarantee that my facts ARE NOT 100% ACUTE.
Lithium 7 becomes 6 because lithium 7 isn't total insert and neutrons basically split off the extra neutron and etc
If it makes you feel any better, that Theoretical Tsar Bomba could be dropped on the front door of 10 Downing Street, and as long as the wind is cooperative, Jersey would be completely safe. Denmark on the other hand…
Tough Subject. We can all hope and pray that Nucs remain an unused deterrent.
In a perfect world with perfect people we can all just be friends. I remember a long time ago being almost perfect for a few days. Of course, I was very sick at the time. But then again, we live our real lives in the real world. 3:17 That is not a real photo but an artist's conception. After watching the video there is good news & some bad news. Good is that in a full attack not everyone would die. Also many publications are reporting the two big players are in back channel talks to reduce their stock piles. Big time reduce like a 10th of what they have now. The really reallly bad news is there is a way to make the radiation deadly for much longer that could kill almost everyone. Sorry.
Violence and war is a part of human nature and has been since the dawn of time. Unfortunately yes. But that's just reality. It's best to not worry about what it's and just live your best life.
@@S1D3W1ND3R015 It can be a terrible spectre if you let your mind dwell on it. But you just have to carry on or let it tear down your normal life. Agreed
You hand yours in first than we will
I live in the USA and it scares me.
As a kid we had “air raid drills were we were told to get under our desks and cover our heads until the sirens stopped. I didn’t bother seeing as I didn’t want the thing I ever did to be hiding and cowering under a desk. It’s nuclear war.
(1:52) The footage displayed is of the nuclear weapons testing done on Bikini Atoll, which was quite a bit stronger than the two bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
You would have think this would not be that unusual to them since the UK has nuclear Weapons. Whats next British couple reacts to someone farting in a restaurant.
outside of the some countries capital cities… i live in one of the safe places on earth… although i don’t think it’ll happen, if it does.. i’m good
Freedom isn't free!
If I find out the missiles are coming I'm going up to the roof with a bottle of scotch
You guys should check out Will We Ever Be Hit By an Asteroid by real life lore makes nuclear weapons seem like a drop in the ocean in comparison.
During a Mutually Assured Destruction scenario everybody that you love would cease to be alive, but, everybody that you can't stand would also cease to be alive, so it would all balance out in the end, right? I'm a glass have full kind of guy.
I already told you to react to "Threads" in an earlier comment section you talked about nuclear powers.
Not that you me or anyone really wants to, but you get used to it.
I’m nearly 70 years old and haven’t drawn one breath without a nuclear weapon aimed at me.
I grew up in San Diego a major US Navy harbor. Lived in Anchorage Alaska a major US Army and Air Force base. Well both have bullseye on them if war broke out.
Now I’m in Arizona with a Marine Air base nearby so at least that is only an afterthought target if you have already hit everything else 😊
So like you I don’t think omg I’m a target every day on my life but I’ve known that all of my life I’m in a fall out zone.
Mutual Assured Destruction, they don’t call it MAD for nothing and you get to live normal lives as long as crazy politicians are not in charge.
Omg we’re screwed…. 😢this latest cadre of world leaders are not the best. I only hope that they are not half as Stupid as I give them credit for.
Cheers 🥂 and prayers 🙏
the beesleys are the bees knees! love u from Washington (state) :p
Tzar bomb was 57MT
We need more...more...MORE!!! :)
You asked for it OP. 🙂
th-cam.com/video/73RYirgeLV4/w-d-xo.html
Watch Threads.
duck and cover
I served in the USAF during the Cold War and I was trained in all things Nuclear - I've actually laid my hands on nuclear bombs. I can't even describe that feeling. The thing they never tell you is that the majority of the huge bombs aren't meant to kill anyone, but produce EMP and wipe out a countries infrastructure. Very few bombs would actually hit the ground and produce fallout, and those are meant to destroy below ground structures like NORAD. The important thing to remember is that no country wants to use nukes because it would be suicide. They are a deterrent to keep world powers in line. It would be great if the whole world simultaneously agreed to get rid of them, but sadly, I don't see that happening in my lifetime. Peace out!
Once invented it cannot be put back in the box. One can never tell who might be the next megalomaniac ready to use one for their own power, that's how M.A.D. began. More recently however chemical and possibly biological weapons were used. Saddam Husein, Iraq used them against Kurds in N. Iraq and possibly in Iran.
Mad mutual assured destruction
The US abandoned that policy years ago. Sorry.
Friends!
Everyone is the cities will get obliterated and the rest of the world gets to play real life Fallout 😅
We haven't all died yet but it's always a possibility.
Millie ,I wish I could hug you and make this all go away❤
Scary part - this is wat they're willing to tell us about.
You can't hand them in as I can guarantee one country wouldn't hand them in that's the problem
I act more like James, but I feel more like Millie, as far as nuclear weapons are concerned. Peace!
belarus now has tactical nukes.
6:30 yea because they were (rightfully) terrified of black people having control of nukes. SA giving up their nukes before their fall is perhaps the most noble thing even done by ethnic Europeans.
Love your accent
If Ukraine had refused to give up its nukes, it would of kept a decent deterrent, and 2022 would have gone much more smoothly for them I’m sure. (Although Russia would still have far more)
🇷🇺🐻🪖🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥🍻🤪
According to the 1991 treaty, Ukraine handed over its weapons in exchange for respecting its borders. According to the treaty, Ukraine also could not join military alliances. However, after a bloody coup d’état and the seizure of power by bandits, construction of an American military base began already in 2017, and at the end 2021 and an attempt to join an alliance, as well as violation and deception during the Minsk agreements, and also in 1991 there was a ban on the sale of land to foreigners, but now most of the land belongs not to Ukrainians, but to DuPont and other Western companies, with the Black Sea Shipping Company the same story. 1 Ukraine has violated all its obligations under the 1991 agreements, why can’t Russia violate at least one in response? 2 In response to ethnic cleansing and the outbreak of an even bloodier war on the border with Russia, which began in 2014 many years before February 24, they tried for a long time to negotiate peacefully with Ukraine, but the former Western leaders who were the guarantee of the implementation of the deal on which territory of Ukraine would go back under her control, Hollande and Merkel confirmed that they were simply stalling for time to arm Ukraine and set it against Russia, and no one was going to fulfill the conditions except Russia and Belarus, THIS WAS THE WAR
Poor spelling! My apologies... (They're is not their....woops)
Peace guys...love your channel...
The Ukraine example is perfect. You can never count on disarming and having someone keep their word. And there will never be a time when the world doesn't have people that want to take power and are willing to kill to gain power. If you give up your deterrence, then you are just a helpless victim to whatever bully comes along.
Nah, I don't believe Russia would just attack Ukraine without any reason, I still sure at this point that Ukraine ask for Them to be Attacked for trying to Enter NATO which would be Dangerous for Russia Border since NATO declare Russia as Enemy so They didn't Disband and keep have Purpose of Existing💀 LOL no matter what people said, Ukraine ask for It for Pro West and want to join Russia Enemy plus that time where They attack all Russian and anyone who speak other language, People just blindly support Them bcz They are the losing side KEKW
On the Beesleys next episode they build a fallout shelter. 😁
Millie I'm 64 now and lived in Florida my hole life and I remember the Cuban missile crisis and remember the scare however even then that the leaders of the nations knew that a nuclear war was unthinkable no one would survive so don't worry this won't happen. Take care now.
@@yonatan62 It was and I'm older than OP. The Cuban incident was a result of the US putting nukes in Turkey.
Turkey then-bordered the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was basically given to the Russian during the Malta Accords by Churchill and FDR. (btw - FDR's grandfather "Delano" got rich selling opium to China. He owned the drug trade in Hong Kong)
Just say no!
That visual scale is awful. Not because of the subject, but because it’s so inaccurate it’s laughable. The tsar bomba was so massive, you wouldn’t even see the Hiroshima bomb in frame. However big you can imagine it being, it was bigger than that. It was biblical apocalyptic terror. Also how is a jetliner bigger than Mount Everest?
Please react to Scott Horton's Enough Already playlist
The scarier part is the US has lost 6 nuclear weapons and Russia has lost atleast 84 and no one knows were they are and who has them.
Remember Hillary Clinton selling a huge chunk of our uranium stockpile to Russia?
Pepperidge Farms remembers.
And Belarus
im pretty sure none is going to nuke the isle of jersey. So in that sense you two are safer than the vast majority of the viewers in the event of a nuclear war.
As long as it only European faces that melt, not us AMERICANS….spare Jersey though
Go tsar bomba London today
No reason to worry because if a thermonuclear conflagration happened our demise will be quick.
Mutually assured deterence is mental but it works. I am sure the US would get rid of them if we could. Hopefully they will be made irrelevant eventually and the need for nations to have them will go away.
My attitude is the same as hers about the nukes. It seems kinda stupid to go on right now living daily lives as others are being slaughtered and the world as a who,e is being threatened by nukes. And the out come to follow this potential. We are all in the right to feel scared and feel hopeless right now. But I’m with you also on trying to stay positive. Like you said. We apparently have no control over them using them. We the people never count for such concerns. Even when making environmental impacts and outcomes. Not to mention those who’d survive it after would have hell to deal with . The bodies to discard. Not at all a things I’d like to survive and witness after. No thank you. Stand up speak up. Don’t allow it. We do have a day really. We have always had that power to say enough. And have the power to stop everything till “they” do. They being those whomever would say ok drop them. What a great idea, No one said ever.
It's a shame we had to be born into this world...The fact that we had no choice is the worst part of all of this
how unfortunate that it wont even be the aggressor fault this first strike happens and instead the idiocity of nato and the U.S
lol, I don't know why you do this to yourselves.
You don't mess with the U.S.
It will hit.
Deagel, which appears to be similar to the UK's "Jane's", predicted the US population would be 99 million by the year 2025.
Biden recently purchased $290,000,000.00 worth of radiation sickness medicines.
The pentagon has been openly discussing first-strike with nukes for the past 5+ years.
Ukraine handed theirs in, and look what's happening to them...
Millie I am sorry your not feeling great about any of this in truth unless you are insane pretty much no one does. Like I wrote you two before I would have nightmares about world ending nuke war when I was five throw seven give or take a month or two. You start to reason out that most people especially those with children of their own won't want to end their lives or future. Like I heard once when I was a kid the one you have to fear is the one who want just one. I know I am long winded but I hope this helps you just a bit.
this video uses exaggerated possibilities to present a heightened fear. There are a lot fewer nukes in the world today than this video states, and the sizes are also nowhere near the Czar Bomba level. The trend has been to develop multi-warheaded missiles which require a smaller size warhead in order to have a single launch vehicle deliver multiple warheads which can be spread out to multiple targets upon re-entry.
Assuming that Russia and the US would not be on the same side of a nuclear conflict, it is impossible for Russia to eliminate all the US targets with its current stockpile, and even less so if you assume that only the deployed warheads would have a chance since the survival of the counter-attack would not be likely, and within these deployed warheads, Russia doesn't have the capability to put most of them inside the US, as the bomber delivered warheads most likely would never reach the US intact, and the vast majority of Submarine/naval deployed would be challenged if not eliminated before launch, leaving only the ICBMs having a majority capable of making it through the defenses to their target. Russia would have to choose between strategically valued targets which would require more since targets would be hardened to resist all but the direct hit, or Russia could choose to go after population centers in which coverage of area becomes the challenge. Modern medical science, building materials, and exposure containment methods dramatically limit immediate or near-immediate lethality. While survivability would not be a cakewalk, there would no doubt be plenty of survivors for which to retaliate and/or defend, leading to the question of why Russia would ever use them beyond retaliation for being nuked themselves?
The US does have enough to both eliminate the population centers of Russia and its Military high-valued targets. The US also has delivery mechanisms that increase the percentage of deployed warheads to actually make it to their targets. Combined with its conventional warfighting capabilities, the US could wipe out both Russia and China, and even have enough to take out their closest allies like Iran and North Korea. This isn't because the US possesses significantly more warheads or has significantly more lethality in those warheads, but because the target selection is a lot smaller as the number of high population centers needed to be targeted are less and the number of high valued military targets are less, combine this with a greater capability of its conventional forces to "mop up" what is left, and this is why the US threat is by far more significant than the Russian threat. Neither Russia nor China has a legitimate missile defense capability, so they rely on eliminating the threat before it is launched. Considering the US has 2 different types of Stealth Bombers capable of deploying nuclear bombs, as well as its vast ICBM launch sites across N. Dakota, Montana, S. Dakota, and a large number of its ICBMs in the form of submarine launched which go undetected, the only way for Russia to eliminate the US threat is to strike first and do so while also sinking all the US subs deployed at the same time. This isn't a realistic option. There is no winning strategy for any country except for the US, in using nuclear weapons, as the consequence for doing so would far outweigh the reward, and that equation isn't even close. You could put all the world's nuclear weapons that are not close allies to the US already (UK & Israel) and still not present a winning outcome to defeating the US, and yet when considering Conventional capabilities as well as nuclear, the US combined with UK, could eliminate any alliance of the remaining countries that would consider it.
But the blast zone is nothing compared to the aftermath /radiation fallout is global ! Why on earth anyone is testing a bomb 7,000 times bigger than Hiroshima is disgusting!!!