Integral over a helix 🧬

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.พ. 2020

ความคิดเห็น • 37

  • @robsbackyardastrophotograp8885
    @robsbackyardastrophotograp8885 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Nobody:
    Peyam: Integral over human DNA because why not?

    • @pandabearguy1
      @pandabearguy1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      DNA is a double helix structure

    • @buxeessingh2571
      @buxeessingh2571 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pandabearguy1 which RNA would be best?

  • @AlRoderick
    @AlRoderick 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    A helix? Is it spring already?

  • @eliyasne9695
    @eliyasne9695 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have a nice interpretation for this line integral:
    The line integral is equivalent to twice the surface area of a surface containing all of the straight lines from (0,0,0) to anywhere on the helix.
    That surface would like like a sort of a wierd rose.

    • @ZXLegend1
      @ZXLegend1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      How did you figure that?

    • @eliyasne9695
      @eliyasne9695 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh, nevermind, i think i have a mistake.

    • @mountainc1027
      @mountainc1027 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's close but instead of multiplying by two, the integrand is the square of all those distances. The way he noticed it was probably because of the Pythagorean Theorem (in 3D)
      Edit: *integrand, not integral. The integral of the square is not equal to the square of the integral.

    • @eliyasne9695
      @eliyasne9695 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mountainc1027
      Yes.

    • @ZXLegend1
      @ZXLegend1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mountainc1027 Yeah that would do it

  • @mathsbyjokes
    @mathsbyjokes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    😅😅😀😀sir🌹🌹 I love ur teaching style..🙏🙏🙏🤗🤗🤗

  • @spongebobsquarepants7388
    @spongebobsquarepants7388 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice video, gonna show this integral to some people at uni tomorrow.
    could it be possible to integrate over a surface constructed by concentric helixes (heli??) if you see what im trying to say

  • @hypnovia
    @hypnovia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wonder... if there exists a continuum of functions using arrow notation. Like, if we assign 1 to addition, 2 to multiplication, 3 to exponentiation, 4 to tetration, etc... what would 1.5 be? 0.5? Where would the limit of a log function, or an exponential, go?

    • @Salarr
      @Salarr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I've wondered this for so long. mathematicians need to step their game up and work on this field lol

    • @hypnovia
      @hypnovia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If this is created, then we could assign a value to every function based on its growth rate.

  • @milkycreamykim6639
    @milkycreamykim6639 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could I use this for calculating the volume of a spiralling light bulb?

  • @matematicasemplice
    @matematicasemplice 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fine...but too simple for you Professor!

  • @MS-cj8uw
    @MS-cj8uw 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful......

  • @GurukulbyADsr
    @GurukulbyADsr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice Sir 👌 India

  • @jarikosonen4079
    @jarikosonen4079 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the shape of the area this gives? It is possible to integrate even don't know what the result represents.

  • @stewartcopeland4950
    @stewartcopeland4950 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    a possible interpretation with the mass of a wire: (6*pi*2^0.5) being the length of helix, (12*pi^2+1) is the average linear density over length of helix

  • @poutineausyropderable7108
    @poutineausyropderable7108 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The integral of e^(iwt) does it perfectly. (It works for volume, not line lenght. Because we'd need |df/dt|^2 and |z| is not linear and |Z| for complex number must be done by part.
    Actually, since this is a helix with a constant frequency, we could do it by parts. (But we'd only do 1/4 of a turn). Multiply by 4 for a turn. Multiply by L/l Where L is the lenght of the elipse and l is the lenght of a turn and you have it.
    Double actually: If we uses Euler identity and just uses a bit of logic, we get exactly back to the 5:31 step.

  • @thethug1946
    @thethug1946 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems like all the maths TH-camrs have fallen by the wayside, except for the legendary Dr Peyam

  • @matron9936
    @matron9936 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mathematicians do c any stuff **insert Numberphile video**

  • @9s572
    @9s572 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where does the “ds” come from?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Line Integral Derivation th-cam.com/video/CxxqH0pwq8o/w-d-xo.html

  • @DancingRain
    @DancingRain 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well, that certainly took an interesting turn.. or three. :P

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I see what you did here

  • @tahseensaad7860
    @tahseensaad7860 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hahahahah what a coincidence, 😂😂😂😂 I'm reading helix on vector space

  • @Lamiranta
    @Lamiranta 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    *SQUARED*

  • @thamnarongiansarn957
    @thamnarongiansarn957 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why the helix goes 3 revolutions?
    How do you know that ?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  ปีที่แล้ว

      0 to 6pi

  • @dhunt6618
    @dhunt6618 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice! (no need to say more:)

  • @gnikola2013
    @gnikola2013 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I swear Mathematitians can only think about density and mass when giving examples about line integrals xd

  • @bavrined5929
    @bavrined5929 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear Dr Peyam! It is very pleasant to watch your videos.
    Please, can you tell me your e-mail, I have quite a complicated problem to share with you. If you could even help me with it, I would be extremely thankful.
    Yours sincerely. Thanks in advance.

  • @shambosaha9727
    @shambosaha9727 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Noice.