Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos th-cam.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D.html Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos th-cam.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k.html
China's state media has always called it a weapons launch platform, or a bomber. Because it can launch hypersonic anti-ship missiles to strike US warships at a distance of 1500km. Old plane but new usage
H6K is an air carrier for carrying cruise missiles long sword 100. which is useful for attacking air carriers and military bases within a range approx. 5000km.
@Pangpi Dawang For which they have the B1 and B2... whilst China has... uh, lots of Badgers. Not invincible, nothing is, but not as impressive as the Chinese Military would like you to think.
@@geoffroberts1126 true, some of Chinese military hardware cannot be considered cutting edge. All those China threat theory circulating among western militaries are only mean to extract more money from taxpayers. Hahaha 😂
@@包发财666 Possibly true to some degree. Though China is acting far more aggressively these days. The whole South China Sea thing isn't sitting well with nations in the region whose territory she's literally stealing. They're doing a lot of sabre rattling these days, those I think there's still rather more rattle than sabre.
@@dyong888I will not comment on that However, never subestimate your opponents. Yet, be able to see through their bluff and grandeurisation. There lies the ability to discern their real capabilities. Terrible aircraft since its introduction, and still is. Though, coupled with an elastic mind... Read the attack on the USS Nimitz, in Tom Clancy's "Red Storm Rising".
@@terazoids2 Go ahead and believe your amerikan propaganda. China has capabilities the yankees haven't seen too. Like dirty harry said, "go on. make my day".
Only against those unable to defend themselves, other than that the B52 is a big slow sitting duck and easy prey , they will only ever be used for stand off weapons or attacks on countries with zero air defence, same applies to all the big slow bombers still in use.
@@georgebarnes8163 after standoff weapons have destroyed everyone's advanced defensive networks, taken down satellites, and obliterated the global supply chain required to replace advanced hardware. it'll be up to these things to end a war.
@@UD2 You are a bit of a dreamer, the B52s have been nothing but target practice since the Vietnam war, they can destroy nothing bar the use of stand of weapons, the B52 were and are big fat slow targets and easy to put down with 1960s tech.
As simply a ballistic and cruise missile platform all it needs to do is get to it's launch point. In fact it's only priority would be getting to it's launch point, they would be virtually disposable. So it looks capable enough to me.
Like B-52 same applies here. If the design works don’t fix it. This is a beautiful plane. 2025 its been 100 years of since US B-52 entered service, upgrading technology and engines it is still 100 years later a best platform of bomber technology. Same applies here. Chinese have upgraded it and it still works great.
Nice video thanks for sending ..with clear explaining of its characters and abilities which its production copied in China. After that progressed in new versions ..its first design...produced in Russia..interests video...H-6 k .later H-6 J new strategic bombers
In today’s Morten battle field it a really Nice Target !! This is supposed to be a strategic weapon however if it is accompanied by a swarm of drones it could be a Game changer
@@xupaolo3820 I know that you Chinese believe that you exist in the middle kingdom , but how many of the little princess flying those things want to go to heaven so soon ?
@@philliplopez8745 I think you know，maybe you think you know better than anyone else as your TRUMP ， but indeed you know just as “ much” as Trump. By the way， this middle kingdom that you are talking about really scares a lot of yours， while we do not know who u r and what u want... what could you and yours want， a branch of white racists and imperialists？who care about？ Your days will get worse and worse，from now beginning
the actual amount of h6 family is over 200 more than 60 of them are newer k/j/n family the whole bomber fleet can lauch more than 300 long range yj62/100 anti ship missiles, as well as another 300 yj8 series short range anti ship missiles all existing h6 family bombers can fire anti ship missiles the quantity is also some kind of quality
The plane is just platform for launching advanced weapons,so China's recent arsenal of very long hypersonic anti ship cruise missiles and super long air to air missiles will make the PLA air force very powerful in Asia.
It's main use will always be long range mass deployment of stand off missiles, decoys and now drones against naval flotillas. To overwhelm the defences of an enemy and force them to expend all their antiair munitions. The second wave of bombers launching before air defences can be reloaded, if that is even possible at sea for vertical launch systems. H-6 use as a conventional bomber would be restricted to areas where the CCP have air superiority or better, supremacy.
The US would need more than one carrier battle group. Maybe three would be a much more overwhelming initiative against an onslaught from the Chinese.Losses on both sides but the US would prevail.
Where are these carriers going to be ? Outside first island chain? They will basically be useless from so far away. If they come inside first island chain, they will be overwhelmed by China's superior numbers and China's numerous carrier killer missiles,including shore based ones. Don't even need h6k but of course they will use them too.
Just use drones to scout, and locate carriers or other ships, and provide targeting data for h-6k to shoot its long range anti ship missiles. Sure, the planes can shoot down the drones but I'll just send a Congo line of drones and trade them for a carrier or aegis destroyer. Job accomplished, 70 aircraft, carrier too basically taken out for cost of few drones and missiles. These are more than enough to provide mobile air launch platform for China's big missiles. Ones that normally need truck to move around on and too heavy for normal fighters.
1. It is not because China has bombers that neighboring countries need U.S. military power, but because of the long-term hostile and unfriendly reconnaissance operations of the U.S. military against China, China must maintain a strong force. 2. The so-called sovereignty dispute in the South China Sea was not a problem until oil was discovered there in 1980. It has always been China’s territory. International law of the sea is not the legal basis for resolving historical territorial waters. Many countries made sovereign declarations when signing this treaty. , China is the same, and the United States has never joined this treaty. 3. Taiwan is a Chinese territory, no matter what he claims to be the Republic of China or whatever, he is just a province in a civil war and rebellion, and foreign countries have no right to interfere. When the United Nations was first established, it also tried to use force to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. It was not until they encountered the Chinese army on the Korean peninsula that the United Nations changed its behavior.
@@stephenjoe653 functions as a car and it gets you places. The u2 spy plane warthog and the b52 all been around 50 years already and they are still great equipment. Their definitely not gonna be better but why would you compare a 90 year old man to a 15 year old?
Old age, by itself, does not make a weapon obsolete. Design shortcomings can break even a new one. More so an old one. The H6 is not a strategic bomber, and its ability to put an effective payload on target is questionable, at best. Even tactically. Furthermore, the H6, the J11, and even their newer designs, like the J20, the FC31 and H20, make patently obvious their inability to develop a native aircraft equal or better than those of their adversaries. Same goes for powerplant and sensors, since everything depends on copying an example, and developing a knockoff, with varying degrees of success.
B-36, B-47, B-52, TU-95 and TU-16 (H-6K) were designed before the air refueling program, thus they were built with extra long and wide wings to glide and save fuel. B-52 regularly fly at sea level from Guam to Vietnam or Diego Garcia without being detected by ground radars. The Russian and Chinese bombers probably flew sea level from 2000 km away until 25 km to Alaska then rose to 10,000 m show up on US radars. It was a surprise detection near Alaska coast, no wonder NORAD scrambled fighter jets in a big hurry.
Why do you assume that the H6 bombers would not have a fighter escort and wouldn't be accompanied with additional fighter jets also carrying antiship missiles to keep busy U.S. fighters and saturate ship defenses? What about the future attack drones?
Besides PLAAF would have their own early warning craft, their escorts and hypersonic drones to spot U.S. ships. They also have land based ballistic antiship missiles. So scores of fighters to keep F-18s busy. Bombers and more fighters to fire more antiship missiles, island based additional fighters AND antiship ballistic missiles would make short work of any carrier strike group with significant loses. Especially if China can deploy future J-35s, 15s, 16s and 20s reliably with hundreds of PL-15s and PL-20s. Plus the PLAN would be there with their own carriers. Currently U.S. would lose 2 carrier strike groups and still win a pyrrhic victory with %50 loss but within 10 years if China could keep up with the U.S. 6th gen fighter and SSN/SSBN program the U.S. would be in a worst position than it already is.
Like all these bombers its an option for dekivering a nuclear weapon. One in the air may get through when other delivery systems have been compromised.
Could you, please, do a video on Type 054 family of frigates from China? In my opinion, latest H-6 variants combined with Type 054 frigates can be very effective for China to control nearby seas.
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 nonsense the HK has twice the range of the SU30, 6,000 km compared to the SU30 @ 3,000 kM, the HK also has a larger bomb load @ 9,000 Kg compared to the SU30 @ 8,000 Kg
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 Ballistic missiles on donkey-drawn carts are still ballistic missiles. Carry missiles, launch missiles, job done. & yes, J-11 & J-16 (Su-30 variants for China) always accompany H-6. No weapon is used by itself.
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 Let them be, my man. Let them think they are really on par with us, or better. They are in for a very rude surprise, if they believe their own lies.
The latest H-6 is called H-6N, N stands for Nuclear. And for sure, its a brand new plane, new engine, new Avionics System, new radar and so on except looks litte bit like Tu-16.
@@leipzigrb4910 Another wumao comrade unmasking. Taiwan wasn't even part of China when the KMT went there, it was ceded to a foreign nation in the late 19th Century. It is not now a province of China. But the CCP would like us all to swallow their propaganda and let them gobble it up like they did to HK. HK was leased, Taiwan is not part of China and probably never will be again. Don't forget to claim your 50c from Grand Dictator Xi.
@@terazoids2 nah, tohse old bombers can carry ai cruise missile close enough to enemy borders/ships to be in 500 kilometer range. they dont need to be advanced at all.
When you look at the 1960's design features of this "thing", it's obvious that it has a radar cross section signature of a container ship. It will be detected before the landing gear doors are closed. Good luck with that!
In any peer to peer offensive weapons system conflict between the US Russia and/or China it will escalate within 20 minutes to all sides trading MIRVs. Those guys (what's left of them) can flourish on a diet of turnips in the cold and dark. Fat westerners (what's left of them), ....not so much.
@@holyboxer2.072 B52 is a strategic bomber with a range unrefuelled of 10.000 km, with a payload of 30 tons. This thing is merely a tactical platform with very short legs and a small payload . Not counting the notoriously unreliable "made în China " engines.
@@tepesvoda464 2000km and 3 tons？ that make nonse，H6K is 6000km + range and 12 tons payload The range and payload of H6 did less than B52, but China does not need to use bombers to bomb a middle east country 8000 kilometers away like the United States. China only wants to conduct defensive operations within 2000 km of its own territory. And H6 fully meets the needs
Самолёт просто красавец. От русского ту -16 остался фезюляж, там где у тушки находился штурман видимо находится радар в зади под килем нет кабины и пушки тоже нет, двигатели размером больше русского.
bisayang manok , Yap that all they can do ..... be a nuisance nothing more ....By the way you should be thankful for China’s Hybrid Rice produced in the Philippines
Can't say but having Bombers past its age and relevance servs no purpose in current times when worlds moving fast in military technology and China themselves have moved to Mars
Strategic bomber become a niche thing now days, only US and China are still developing new next gen strategic bomber. It's a cheaper way of launching air to surface missile and bombs, it only works when you control the air space or beating some back water 3rd world country.
Very Brief And Summarized Ideas : The aircraft has an outdated airframe design , although the Chinese are working hard on developing and modernizing it, but it is still the same basic platform with substantial developments and upgrade to enhance combat and operational efficiency with a focus on providing it with modern aviation systems in addition to increasing combat range and combat payload. The aircraft has an outdated airframe design, although the Chinese are working hard on developing and modernizing it, but it is still the same basic platform with fundamental developments to improve combat and operational efficiency with a focus on providing it with modern aviation systems in addition to increasing combat range and combat payloads ... In my opinion, the Chinese should have bought the TU22 backfire or the TU160 blackjack and directed their resources ( money , efforts , industrial skills , technological capabilities) on developing and modernizing it to come up with a new platform where many factors ; Speed, combat range, payload , plays an essential roles in increasing the combat and operational effectiveness of this strategic and medium bombers such as the TU-22 which is radically scalable platform ... Likewise, China has not worked to design a domestic model for a conventional long-range bomber as it has done to meet its need from the combat and combat support aircrafts such as the J8 interceptor fighter , and the strike aircraft or light tactical bomber the JH-7 ..... etc or the medium and heavy transport aircrafts that can shares with strategic bombers the same basic layout , general designing principles and the combat and operational requirements like the high payloads and operational ranges ... External hard points are useful for carrying ammunition and extra fuel tanks to increase combat range, but the internal payloads, especially the integration of missiles inside the airframe, would improve the aerodynamic performance of the aircraft and reduce its radar signature. China has 231 bombers of this type, with payloads of up to 12 tons per bomber and a combat range of up to 3500 km.With the use of new C-10 cruise missiles, each aircraft can carry 6 missiles with a range of 3000 km , this mean 6500 km effective combat range , and with 1386 missiles for single-burst cruise cruise with a warhead of 500 kg per each missile , The total combat assets of the DY american Pacific and Indian-fleet are 200 vessels distributed between surface combat ships and submarines, meaning that the share of each marine vessel is about 7 cruise missiles with a total of 3.5 tons of explosives per vessel , of course some naval vessels will not need more than one or two missiles, and this allows to direct more missiles to the main surface combat ships such as DY americans and british kuscraft carriers ... These bombers can also be loaded with anti-submarine torpedoes or depth bombs, submersible marine mines , Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUV) which could be autonomously conduct search and destroy missions or to be distributed to ambush the passing enemy submarines and the combat and combat support vessels ... I think all those upgrading and development programs are interim solutions until china finalized the fielding of its new long range strategic bomber the stealthy Xian H-20 , otherwise they could try to purchase the licence for manufacturing more modern medium and long range bombers than the outdated H6 which is based on the tu16 badger, like the tu 22 backfire and tu 160 blackjack . The stealthy Xian H-20 have combat range of 8000 km and a combat payloads of 20 ton , but theoretically, from an operational point of view, the stealth aircraft cannot be used as a workhorse for the PLAAF , where in and in wartime, stealth aircrafts are often used in highend contests ( air2kus , air2ground, antiships for example the aircraft carrier groups ) , especially in the opening stages of warfare , negotiating the high-value targets that are often geographically located within the main air defense sectors' or being covered and defended by advance air defense systems and needed to be penetrated undetected . and in peacetime the training processes are conducted with great cautious to maintain the highest level of operational readiness . However, this is not an absolute fixed rules , were the flying characteristic , technical specifications , kinematic performance data of the new Chinese long rang bomber project Xian H-20 are surpassing what chinese PLAAF fielding from the medium and strategic bombers . Even so I think even after the new Chinese bomber will enter the mass production lines and enter service in large numbers turning it into the backbone of the strategic bombing command in the Chinese Air Force PLAAF , those H6 bombers will play complementary role to the incoming new long range strategic bomber , either in the PLAAF or transfer to the coastal defense force of the chinese naval force considering China’s claims in the disputed Maritime zones stretching to the second chain of islands are within the operational ranges of H6 bombers putting DY americans military installations and facilities in guam and the mariana Islands , part of the british colony australia , the Alaska , japan within reach of those bombers from very safe distances , actually from within the chinese mainland airspace those bombers can launch its long range standoff missiles ... Always And For Ever May God Bless The Ununited States Of HM Shninasios ....
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos
th-cam.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D.html
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos
th-cam.com/play/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k.html
China's state media has always called it a weapons launch platform, or a bomber. Because it can launch hypersonic anti-ship missiles to strike US warships at a distance of 1500km. Old plane but new usage
That's the H-6N. The K can launch supersonic missiles though
H6K is an air carrier for carrying cruise missiles long sword 100. which is useful for attacking air carriers and military bases within a range approx. 5000km.
@@guongnlm5529 H6K is not a bomber, just a missile carrier, please do not mislead by its initial HONG.
I think they're a great idea! Cheap, versatile, long range, reliable & as deadly as your best cruise missiles.
The future will be H20, so there will be no primary upgrading plan for H6K anymore.
Perfect for its role. You don't need a Ferrari to do grocery shopping in real life do you
Are you suggesting the USAF, has over complicated things, with their b2 and soon to be b21
@@jonathantarrant2449 the average taxpayer will tell you YES
Why do you think North Korea still buys mig 21s
You do not need a Cadillac to get to seoul in 7 minutes.
@@jonathantarrant2449 hell yes
@@jonathantarrant2449 yes. That's why the b52 bomber doing the bombing roles. America is known to waste tax payers money and being inefficient
This bomber also has the potential to be converted to an ECM, AWACS and reconnaissance platform.
High tech is generally a force multiplier, but quantity has a quality all its own. Super weapons are a double edged sword...
Very cool to see an old plane design upgraded and updated.
B-52: am I nothing to you?
The H6 is a variant of the Tu 16, which premiered in 1952--just like the B-52.
@Pangpi Dawang But also significant smaller, so it can not transport as many bombs or cm as the B-52.
and can't cross the Pacific ocean!!
@Pangpi Dawang For which they have the B1 and B2... whilst China has... uh, lots of Badgers. Not invincible, nothing is, but not as impressive as the Chinese Military would like you to think.
@@geoffroberts1126 true, some of Chinese military hardware cannot be considered cutting edge. All those China threat theory circulating among western militaries are only mean to extract more money from taxpayers. Hahaha 😂
@@包发财666 Possibly true to some degree. Though China is acting far more aggressively these days. The whole South China Sea thing isn't sitting well with nations in the region whose territory she's literally stealing. They're doing a lot of sabre rattling these days, those I think there's still rather more rattle than sabre.
The latest H6-N can carry one air-launched hyper gliding ICBM.
Sometimes, you don't need to be highly advanced to beat your opponent. Good enough is good enough.
Which this plane isn't.
@@terazoids2 hahah you're an expert.
@@dyong888I will not comment on that However, never subestimate your opponents. Yet, be able to see through their bluff and grandeurisation. There lies the ability to discern their real capabilities. Terrible aircraft since its introduction, and still is. Though, coupled with an elastic mind... Read the attack on the USS Nimitz, in Tom Clancy's "Red Storm Rising".
B-52's are just as old.
@@terazoids2 Go ahead and believe your amerikan propaganda. China has capabilities the yankees haven't seen too. Like dirty harry said, "go on. make my day".
Great video man! Thank you!
A very efficient and practical design and can be upgraded and upgraded and modified forever. Excellent aerodynamic design and efficient
A #copied design
Wait... you're a bot right!
@@RaveSharrma You are alien?
@@RaveSharrma Only a very smart people know a good design to improve on and not reinvent a less efficient design
@@RaveSharrma you should sue them for money.
Interesting , Thanks for sharing
Simplicity is undervalued. This thing along with the B52s will be workhorses in a real war.
Only against those unable to defend themselves, other than that the B52 is a big slow sitting duck and easy prey , they will only ever be used for stand off weapons or attacks on countries with zero air defence, same applies to all the big slow bombers still in use.
@@georgebarnes8163 after standoff weapons have destroyed everyone's advanced defensive networks, taken down satellites, and obliterated the global supply chain required to replace advanced hardware. it'll be up to these things to end a war.
@@UD2 You are a bit of a dreamer, the B52s have been nothing but target practice since the Vietnam war, they can destroy nothing bar the use of stand of weapons, the B52 were and are big fat slow targets and easy to put down with 1960s tech.
TU-16:This is my illegitimate son
As simply a ballistic and cruise missile platform all it needs to do is get to it's launch point. In fact it's only priority would be getting to it's launch point, they would be virtually disposable. So it looks capable enough to me.
And some, perhaps many, of those launch points will be within Chinese airspace.
Capable enough is a perfectly acceptable strategic doctrine
Like B-52 same applies here. If the design works don’t fix it. This is a beautiful plane. 2025 its been 100 years of since US B-52 entered service, upgrading technology and engines it is still 100 years later a best platform of bomber technology. Same applies here. Chinese have upgraded it and it still works great.
Lots of info in your video! The Badger lives on.
These are really detailed reports nice work
Nice video thanks for sending ..with clear explaining of its characters and abilities which its production copied in China. After that progressed in new versions ..its first design...produced in Russia..interests video...H-6 k .later H-6 J new strategic bombers
Excellent analysis
Really interesting video
Awesome looking
Belongs to the 1960s when the Beatles reigned supreme.
The ageless B-52 has origins in the 1950s and many years of service left as a design.
@@shattered115 The B-52 or the H-6whatever is useless without air supremacy. That is something PRC airforce can never have.
@@fv1234 Didn't the US have air superiority in Vietnam? Vietnam took down a lot of B-52 anyway AFAIR...
@金英文二世 Junk
@金英文二世 We saved your sorry ass from the Japanese. Should have let the Japanese take you.
This is basically still Tu-16 with total improvement.
It has total different function than tu16. Tu16 dropped bombs and h6 doesn't
The analysis is fair enough i think
The badger 🦡 is a leap? That's like modernizing a B-29 and calling it a leap.
Well... You can say the same about B-52...
b52
In today’s Morten battle field it a really Nice Target !! This is supposed to be a strategic weapon however if it is accompanied by a swarm of drones it could be a Game changer
If drones have the range to knock her out 😂
It's tasks are to launch long range missles in safe distance, so you have to flank it with interceptor/fighters I guess
Look I've been shopping at Harbor Freight for a few years now.............I wouldn't be too worried about these bombers and their capabilities.
This is an underrated comment!
Parts are all knock off and spurious 😂
That thing has "target " written all over it !
yeah， try to immagine 100 H6 autopilote or contralled by J20. As allways， some one think too little and talk too much
@@xupaolo3820 I know that you Chinese believe that you exist in the middle kingdom , but how many of the little princess flying those things want to go to heaven so soon ?
@@philliplopez8745 I think you know，maybe you think you know better than anyone else as your TRUMP ， but indeed you know just as “ much” as Trump. By the way， this middle kingdom that you are talking about really scares a lot of yours， while we do not know who u r and what u want... what could you and yours want， a branch of white racists and imperialists？who care about？ Your days will get worse and worse，from now beginning
the actual amount of h6 family is over 200
more than 60 of them are newer k/j/n family
the whole bomber fleet can lauch more than 300 long range yj62/100 anti ship missiles, as well as another 300 yj8 series short range anti ship missiles
all existing h6 family bombers can fire anti ship missiles
the quantity is also some kind of quality
The plane is just platform for launching advanced weapons,so China's recent arsenal of very long hypersonic anti ship cruise missiles and super long air to air missiles will make the PLA air force very powerful in Asia.
The words “advanced” and “China” do not go together.
@@Ac22768 Hmmmm...says the crumbling murican 😂😂
Could you do a video of the J-20 and FC-31? :)
It's main use will always be long range mass deployment of stand off missiles, decoys and now drones against naval flotillas. To overwhelm the defences of an enemy and force them to expend all their antiair munitions. The second wave of bombers launching before air defences can be reloaded, if that is even possible at sea for vertical launch systems. H-6 use as a conventional bomber would be restricted to areas where the CCP have air superiority or better, supremacy.
The US would need more than one carrier battle group. Maybe three would be a much more overwhelming initiative against an onslaught from the Chinese.Losses on both sides but the US would prevail.
Where are these carriers going to be ? Outside first island chain? They will basically be useless from so far away.
If they come inside first island chain, they will be overwhelmed by China's superior numbers and China's numerous carrier killer missiles,including shore based ones. Don't even need h6k but of course they will use them too.
Just use drones to scout, and locate carriers or other ships, and provide targeting data for h-6k to shoot its long range anti ship missiles. Sure, the planes can shoot down the drones but I'll just send a Congo line of drones and trade them for a carrier or aegis destroyer. Job accomplished, 70 aircraft, carrier too basically taken out for cost of few drones and missiles.
These are more than enough to provide mobile air launch platform for China's big missiles. Ones that normally need truck to move around on and too heavy for normal fighters.
Jilin -1 satellites can live stream what's on the surface of the earth with HD quality.
Interesting video
Hey this is how I would Problem Solve.
1. It is not because China has bombers that neighboring countries need U.S. military power, but because of the long-term hostile and unfriendly reconnaissance operations of the U.S. military against China, China must maintain a strong force.
2. The so-called sovereignty dispute in the South China Sea was not a problem until oil was discovered there in 1980. It has always been China’s territory. International law of the sea is not the legal basis for resolving historical territorial waters. Many countries made sovereign declarations when signing this treaty. , China is the same, and the United States has never joined this treaty.
3. Taiwan is a Chinese territory, no matter what he claims to be the Republic of China or whatever, he is just a province in a civil war and rebellion, and foreign countries have no right to interfere.
When the United Nations was first established, it also tried to use force to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. It was not until they encountered the Chinese army on the Korean peninsula that the United Nations changed its behavior.
This is more wing than plane, looks very much old school 70's Soviet Tech.
Hehe 50's is when they're really from!
Cool plane👍
A pacemaker, artificial hips, and hearing aids don't make a 90 year old man any less than 90 years old.
Doesn’t make it any less then 90 years old but still functions the same
What if the 90 year old has cruise missiles?
@@testserver2054 You can say a 1950's Toyota better than a 2020 Tesla, but only in your dream.
@@stephenjoe653 functions as a car and it gets you places. The u2 spy plane warthog and the b52 all been around 50 years already and they are still great equipment. Their definitely not gonna be better but why would you compare a 90 year old man to a 15 year old?
Old age, by itself, does not make a weapon obsolete. Design shortcomings can break even a new one. More so an old one. The H6 is not a strategic bomber, and its ability to put an effective payload on target is questionable, at best. Even tactically. Furthermore, the H6, the J11, and even their newer designs, like the J20, the FC31 and H20, make patently obvious their inability to develop a native aircraft equal or better than those of their adversaries. Same goes for powerplant and sensors, since everything depends on copying an example, and developing a knockoff, with varying degrees of success.
भैय्या चाइना का माल है, चले तो चांद तक नहीं तो फिर शाम तक 😂😂😂😂
Boooo
No one wants to fly glass cockpit give me those dials in my 1950s jet any day.
B-36, B-47, B-52, TU-95 and TU-16 (H-6K) were designed before the air refueling program, thus they were built with extra long and wide wings to glide and save fuel. B-52 regularly fly at sea level from Guam to Vietnam or Diego Garcia without being detected by ground radars. The Russian and Chinese bombers probably flew sea level from 2000 km away until 25 km to Alaska then rose to 10,000 m show up on US radars. It was a surprise detection near Alaska coast, no wonder NORAD scrambled fighter jets in a big hurry.
Why do you assume that the H6 bombers would not have a fighter escort and wouldn't be accompanied with additional fighter jets also carrying antiship missiles to keep busy U.S. fighters and saturate ship defenses? What about the future attack drones?
H-6N and H-20 are the real deal.
@@AbdulRasyidPangrango-qr9dt China makes its own helicopters and stealth fighters. Where are you from Abdul? Can your country even produce screws?
Denk geldigim ilk videon. Cok basarili olmus.
Sana basarilar dilerim..
nice plane
Besides PLAAF would have their own early warning craft, their escorts and hypersonic drones to spot U.S. ships. They also have land based ballistic antiship missiles. So scores of fighters to keep F-18s busy. Bombers and more fighters to fire more antiship missiles, island based additional fighters AND antiship ballistic missiles would make short work of any carrier strike group with significant loses. Especially if China can deploy future J-35s, 15s, 16s and 20s reliably with hundreds of PL-15s and PL-20s. Plus the PLAN would be there with their own carriers. Currently U.S. would lose 2 carrier strike groups and still win a pyrrhic victory with %50 loss but within 10 years if China could keep up with the U.S. 6th gen fighter and SSN/SSBN program the U.S. would be in a worst position than it already is.
The H6 might be new but it’s just a Chinese built TU-16 Russian bomber first built in 27 April 1952.
Well. it's lucky that they have ejector seats.
They can also have DF-10 and YJ-18. Good for them.
Add light missile also
Like all these bombers its an option for dekivering a nuclear weapon. One in the air may get through when other delivery systems have been compromised.
Good analysis...
These barely modern bombers could fly in formation over Manila uncontested.
Chinese homemade strategic nuclear bomber develop to Install electronic advance warfare...a guided precision nuclear bomb..
The Russians make very pretty planes.
Because the Chinese cannot
Actually they do/did. The Tu-160 'Blackjack' Белый лебедь, or Belyj Lebeď, 'White Swan' is quite a striking looking aircraft.
Yeah it's 60 year old Russian badger
Design yes. Material, avionics, engines and weapons are new. Its lighter than the original
Add turbo
With analog radar
profession thanks
question, why can't we lobe missles from a modified boeing 737, why do we have to use this?
Chinese is running out of alphabet to name the aircraft's models
china have their own names in chinese,these h ,y, j stuff is for foreigners.
Its a tu 95 bear with jet engines there class like
Me gusta mucho más que los feos B1 Lancer y el B1 Lancer ruso TU 160 o Ty 160,el El Cisne blanco. Un saludo. 👋
Could you, please, do a video on Type 054 family of frigates from China?
In my opinion, latest H-6 variants combined with Type 054 frigates can be very effective for China to control nearby seas.
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 nonsense the HK has twice the range of the SU30, 6,000 km compared to the SU30 @ 3,000 kM, the HK also has a larger bomb load @ 9,000 Kg compared to the SU30 @ 8,000 Kg
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 LOL, I am happy to educate you, no need to Thank me for correcting you.
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 Ballistic missiles on donkey-drawn carts are still ballistic missiles. Carry missiles, launch missiles, job done.
& yes, J-11 & J-16 (Su-30 variants for China) always accompany H-6. No weapon is used by itself.
I would like that. Taiwan's and US navies would love that, too.
@@nicolaasjonkhart4660 Let them be, my man. Let them think they are really on par with us, or better. They are in for a very rude surprise, if they believe their own lies.
01:02 lower right corner of the screen, Russian letters РД, meaning taxiway. Ha?
Nato have no sense naming Russian/Soviet plane.
time to talk about the H-20 stealth Bomber.
What for?
Still shrouded in mystery though, not much to talk about.
"Have also badgered" haha
# Men in Black SAID DON'T REPORT THIS.
B-52s look more modern!
We will see ,H6 series can service another 60 years😂😂😂😂😂😂
Probably sea patrol aircraft with anti ship and sub capabilities.
Is it still called H-6x? Chinese does things her own way. This H-6 is completely different from that H-6.
With light missile
来了来了
The latest H-6 is called H-6N, N stands for Nuclear. And for sure, its a brand new plane, new engine, new Avionics System, new radar and so on except looks litte bit like Tu-16.
and BTW, Taiwan is actually a province of China, KMT in Taiwan is locality separatist power
@@leipzigrb4910 Another wumao comrade unmasking. Taiwan wasn't even part of China when the KMT went there, it was ceded to a foreign nation in the late 19th Century. It is not now a province of China. But the CCP would like us all to swallow their propaganda and let them gobble it up like they did to HK. HK was leased, Taiwan is not part of China and probably never will be again. Don't forget to claim your 50c from Grand Dictator Xi.
LOL stop showing your brain level, just live your happy life dude, don’t judge if you don’t know the history. Best wishes 🙌🏻
Nowadays, it's all about the weapon systems.
Weapon carriers don't matter much.
Weapon carriers are part of weapon systems.
@@terazoids2 nah, tohse old bombers can carry ai cruise missile close enough to enemy borders/ships to be in 500 kilometer range. they dont need to be advanced at all.
heh... performance similar to H-6K (which itself is a Tu-16). well, hopefully, noone will see them in any war.
When you look at the 1960's design features of this "thing", it's obvious that it has a radar cross section signature of a container ship. It will be detected before the landing gear doors are closed. Good luck with that!
In any peer to peer offensive weapons system conflict between the US Russia and/or China it will escalate within 20 minutes to all sides trading MIRVs. Those guys (what's left of them) can flourish on a diet of turnips in the cold and dark. Fat westerners (what's left of them), ....not so much.
B52 also 1960's design and USAF want to use them until 2060s
@@holyboxer2.072 B52 is a strategic bomber with a range unrefuelled of 10.000 km, with a payload of 30 tons. This thing is merely a tactical platform with very short legs and a small payload . Not counting the notoriously unreliable "made în China " engines.
@@tepesvoda464 2000km and 3 tons？
that make nonse，H6K is 6000km + range and 12 tons payload
The range and payload of H6 did less than B52, but China does not need to use bombers to bomb a middle east country 8000 kilometers away like the United States.
China only wants to conduct defensive operations within 2000 km of its own territory.
And H6 fully meets the needs
@@holyboxer2.072 LOL
it's flys, it drop bombs and it kills you, i don't know why people are complaining
Самолёт просто красавец. От русского ту -16 остался фезюляж, там где у тушки находился штурман видимо находится радар в зади под килем нет кабины и пушки тоже нет, двигатели размером больше русского.
It's a 1950's Russian design. It would be an easy target for modern US weapons.
The outside is old but whatever inside is very new, far not that easy as you think.
@@Mx77E Cruise missile launch platform it is enough
So it's B52
@@zuluwhiskey9049 iT'S QUITE EASY TO SEE WHO HAS TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE.
A living fossil. I think she looks good.
David Zitzman+ If you were back in in 1950 maybe mucker.
B52 too.
Ready to go and this is what deterred America
bisayang manok ,
Yap that all they can do ..... be a nuisance nothing more ....By the way you should be thankful for China’s Hybrid Rice produced in the Philippines
bisayang manok ,
Shitty gratitude....are you jealous ?
bisayang manok ,
Not interested in your opinion I need my space ....build your own
300 unit need
Its mainly used for mass missile launches at US carrier groups. Makes sense since the US is there main threat.
Soviet Tupolev Tu-16
Can't say but having Bombers past its age and relevance servs no purpose in current times when worlds moving fast in military technology and China themselves have moved to Mars
It is never flown above India
Strategic bomber become a niche thing now days, only US and China are still developing new next gen strategic bomber.
It's a cheaper way of launching air to surface missile and bombs, it only works when you control the air space or beating some back water 3rd world country.
ABCDEFGHIJK, ok, there is still much room for improvement.
can we just designate this aircraft a missile carrier instead of a bomber. its payload and range sucks.
I like US B 52 is the best.
Imagine that this shit old bomber still has a limited strategic value today.
Like the B52? The B2 Lancer is 40 years old. I think this updated aircraft could be very effective.
Soviet TU-16
H20何时下水？
Very Brief And Summarized Ideas :
The aircraft has an outdated airframe design , although the Chinese are working hard on developing and modernizing it, but it is still the same basic platform with substantial developments and upgrade to enhance combat and operational efficiency with a focus on providing it with modern aviation systems in addition to increasing combat range and combat payload. The aircraft has an outdated airframe design, although the Chinese are working hard on developing and modernizing it, but it is still the same basic platform with fundamental developments to improve combat and operational efficiency with a focus on providing it with modern aviation systems in addition to increasing combat range and combat payloads ...
In my opinion, the Chinese should have bought the TU22 backfire or the TU160 blackjack and directed their resources ( money , efforts , industrial skills , technological capabilities) on developing and modernizing it to come up with a new platform where many factors ; Speed, combat range, payload , plays an essential roles in increasing the combat and operational effectiveness of this strategic and medium bombers such as the TU-22 which is radically scalable platform ...
Likewise, China has not worked to design a domestic model for a conventional long-range bomber as it has done to meet its need from the combat and combat support aircrafts such as the J8 interceptor fighter , and the strike aircraft or light tactical bomber the JH-7 ..... etc or the medium and heavy transport aircrafts that can shares with strategic bombers the same basic layout , general designing principles and the combat and operational requirements like the high payloads and operational ranges ...
External hard points are useful for carrying ammunition and extra fuel tanks to increase combat range, but the internal payloads, especially the integration of missiles inside the airframe, would improve the aerodynamic performance of the aircraft and reduce its radar signature. China has 231 bombers of this type, with payloads of up to 12 tons per bomber and a combat range of up to 3500 km.With the use of new C-10 cruise missiles, each aircraft can carry 6 missiles with a range of 3000 km , this mean 6500 km effective combat range , and with 1386 missiles for single-burst cruise cruise with a warhead of 500 kg per each missile , The total combat assets of the DY american Pacific and Indian-fleet are 200 vessels distributed between surface combat ships and submarines, meaning that the share of each marine vessel is about 7 cruise missiles with a total of 3.5 tons of explosives per vessel , of course some naval vessels will not need more than one or two missiles, and this allows to direct more missiles to the main surface combat ships such as DY americans and british kuscraft carriers ...
These bombers can also be loaded with anti-submarine torpedoes or depth bombs, submersible marine mines , Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUV) which could be autonomously conduct search and destroy missions or to be distributed to ambush the passing enemy submarines and the combat and combat support vessels ...
I think all those upgrading and development programs are interim solutions until china finalized the fielding of its new long range strategic bomber the stealthy Xian H-20 , otherwise they could try to purchase the licence for manufacturing more modern medium and long range bombers than the outdated H6 which is based on the tu16 badger, like the tu 22 backfire and tu 160 blackjack .
The stealthy Xian H-20 have combat range of 8000 km and a combat payloads of 20 ton , but theoretically, from an operational point of view, the stealth aircraft cannot be used as a workhorse for the PLAAF , where in and in wartime, stealth aircrafts are often used in highend contests ( air2kus , air2ground, antiships for example the aircraft carrier groups ) , especially in the opening stages of warfare , negotiating the high-value targets that are often geographically located within the main air defense sectors' or being covered and defended by advance air defense systems and needed to be penetrated undetected . and in peacetime the training processes are conducted with great cautious to maintain the highest level of operational readiness .
However, this is not an absolute fixed rules , were the flying characteristic , technical specifications , kinematic performance data of the new Chinese long rang bomber project Xian H-20 are surpassing what chinese PLAAF fielding from the medium and strategic bombers .
Even so I think even after the new Chinese bomber will enter the mass production lines and enter service in large numbers turning it into the backbone of the strategic bombing command in the Chinese Air Force PLAAF , those H6 bombers will play complementary role to the incoming new long range strategic bomber , either in the PLAAF or transfer to the coastal defense force of the chinese naval force considering China’s claims in the disputed Maritime zones stretching to the second chain of islands are within the operational ranges of H6 bombers putting DY americans military installations and facilities in guam and the mariana Islands , part of the british colony australia , the Alaska , japan within reach of those bombers from very safe distances , actually from within the chinese mainland airspace those bombers can launch its long range standoff missiles ...
Always And For Ever May God Bless The Ununited States Of HM Shninasios ....