These hyperloop plans are based on a lot of research. The one in this video was probably the best first option for Europe, considering all aspects. One can't just connect major cities that are far apart. One needs to calculate possible use and if that use makes it viable or not.
geography makes it really hard, this is long vast distances that need to go through mountains, water, terrain etc.. all in very safe and economically viable way
Tunnels or will be required in most cases. If you see how many tunnels European countries have built, it won't be a big problem to do the same with a hyperloop.
Not really, since united state always failing in infrastructure between 1920 - 1960, everyone wasn't expecting united states could be a superpower from 1970, they made owning a car much easier and cheaper, air travel became more common, lots of paved way across the country, don't underestimate
1.Delhi to chennai: via Jaipur, Ahemadabad,Mumbai,Pune,goa Hyderabad,Bengaluru. 2.Delhi to Hyderabad: via Lucknow, Varanasi, Ranchi, Kolkata, Bhubaneshwar, vishakapatanam. 3.Mumbai to Thiruvananthapuram: via Pune, Goa, Mangalore, kannur, Calicut, Kochi.
Mr.perfect cheaper work force is now not a priority anymore. Because now everything is moving towards gig economy especially in high populated countries
In Russia we bring coffee to our wives. Yeas, we don't allow them to carry hot things, heavy things, any kind of hazardous things. Unlike you, western welfareboys.
Do you have any concept of insanely high cost of building a hyperloop? Just the tunnel would be prohibitive, then you need to build a pipe that can withstand the vacuum pressure, then a vehicle that protects the occupants from the deadly vacuum, then the maglev system, etc., etc. Sorry, but hyperloop is just one of Elon Musk's ridiculous pipe dreams. Never going to happen.
Don't forget the insane amount of security that would be needed for passengers and all along the tube. Hyperloop is a failure in so many levels before it even starts.
@@zen1647 exactly! I think there is actually a chance for it to work, just look at the history of the aviation industry, but some real clever minds were behind that project. Having Elon the head of this project is going to be a catastrophe just like the Vegas looo
Exactly. Unfortunately a thumbs down for this video. I like mindless entertainment and dumbening down over time, but there is a limit to how mindless I can be.
Horrible clickbait title. I reported it and I suggest others do the same. Here's what I reported. "Title states 10 hyper loops that WILL change the world, yet the video states NO governments or private companies have committed to or even are looking at possible investment. Then proceeds to detail 10 FANTASY hyper loops that might maybe possibly be built, pure fiction and baseless speculation."
Hyperloops biggest benefit would come from linking small towns to major cities, for example, hagerstown MD, to baltimore or washington DC, by car its 1.5 hours, with no traffic. With rails like this, you could live in the country, where its cheap, theres no traffic, and little crime, then commute into the city no problem.
@@thegeth4293 disagree, they need demand right off the bat to get profit. Once they prove the concept is profitable, they can expand out to smaller cities.
Not only are all these projects pipe dreams, but I especially loved the hyperloop concept through seismically super active Honshu, Japan. What could ever go wrong?
They said the same thing about building giant skyscrapers around regions like Japan and surrounding Asian countries. But look what happened. Humans adapt over time, nothing is impossible.
@@euphoria667 it's not efficient else would have already took place. + Easy to sabotage, just find a way to get that vacuum tube to have a blast of air and your system fell apart pretty quickly. It's Vunerable and hell as expensive so not worth any money. Skyscrapers still have their problems and aren't sustainable means. They however could be solution to Alot crammed space but for that it's not big enough issue Everywhere. It's just that Alot of parking spaces are there.
@@euphoria667 this is a dumb comparison; a false equivalency. The hyper loop is not going to fix anything that we can’t with existing assets. A really fast train can do the job just as well if not better if we actually invest on it. The hyper loop concept has been in the drafts since 1799. If it was actually possible wouldn’t you think we would have something at least resembling a vacuum pressurized tube train by now? Elon Musk is not Tony Stark, stop sucking him off. Also just because something isn’t impossible doesn’t mean it’s efficient or a good idea at all.
@@masterchief5603 There are two types of skyscrapers, exorbitant super tall skyscrapers made as a landmark and prestige for the country and those that simply serve residential services and rarely ornamental.
For that to be effective, the station on the LA side would require a hellishly large parking lot and the station in Vegas would have to take up a lot of high-end real estate close to the Strip or have good public transport connections. Connecting the two cities is the easy part of Hyperloop, the great problem lies in the stations and how to transport people to and from them.
No. It would be the world's largest and most expensive single-use mass murder machine. But you're a thoughtless fool - so you don't understand this fact.
Japan is currently working on a maglev train line from Tokyo to Osaka through Nagoya. Why would they forgo it for hyperloop?? Also since the hyperloop concept entails personal transport, no line in itself makes any sense, only a network of lines can compete with trains
@@kristoffer3000 | Marketing bullshit maybe, but then a lot of folks were saying that of electric cars not so long ago. The pace of development of evacuated tube transport, incorporating maglev is astounding and would be like space travel, on earth - but as you claim, maybe all ‘hot air’, or ‘hot vacuum’ but not if they can overcome the engineering challenges along the way - all those student projects in various universities are loving the challenge. Also Richard Branson invested a lot of money in Hyperloop One, now Virgin Hyperloop One... we will see what transpires...
@@macro325mike It'll never be reality because it's so deeply flawed from the get go, a tiny hole would make the vacuum impossible to maintain, the heat expansion on a length of tube like that is incredible and we already know what can happen to railroad tracks that get hot, they look like snakes on the ground, it's also incredibly dangerous if there's a leak because the shockwave of air would tear things to shreds. It's cool tech but it's nothing new and it hasn't been built before because it's not fit for the real world.
@@penskepc2374n which Elon Musk resuscitates a daffy idea from the 19th century, presents it as his own, and wins the gasps and adulation of, essentially, suckers. Four years later we can compare and contrast with a whole deck of non-starter Musky notions and… Hey! Strings of linked teleportation booths all over the place would be much better, and only a little less practical than hyper loops! He’s a fraud, kids. (And this video is a terrible, terrible embarrassment. Should be deleted, ASAP.)
Hyperloop has the same problem as monorail, it's theoretically better than current infrastructure, but trains can already run on current infrastructure and gradual improvements are easier to implement.
better for industry because they can take their time making the changes, where as innovators produce the new technology now that Industry will struggle to catch up to for another 15 years. that's why we still burn fossil fuels instead of converting to all solar/wind/wave energy production, if SWW was the only source of energy, you can guarantee they would suddenly become very efficient and affordable very quickly, instead of making the transition over decades.
@@RIXRADvidz simply put, meglev exist idk why peeps want something like meglev in vacuum tube. Btw why not just have a connected two ways big engine than individual pods? Wait isn't that just energy capacity issue? Why not have a electric bar line to supply power, oh boi another train 🚆.
Also to be honest meglev project also has good amount of losses that are still happening + it's pretty expensive to place up against conventional rail lines even if working on electric power and they exist. Sabotage is another issue of these loops as it renders everything to stop while railways keeps things going as it is. So for compensation of more speed this all weaknesses and losses are induced. Right.. (sigh)
Basically one that runs alongside I-80 until you hit Salt Lake City. Could be feasible, most of the land is already cleared, and because it runs along one of the most important Interstates, every town in between would be a valuable stop.
@@razor3106 I think if the line is already coming from LA to SF, why make another directly from LA to west. Its going north anyway. It could go Vegas, La, Sf, and go east from there
It is much more feasible and beneficial to join the cities along the coasts rather than east to west. East to West is optimal for flight. You need to optimize the number of people with the shortest tubes - crossing the country is not efficient.
None of this would be affordable for the working or middle class. Hyperloop is just a useless projects: more high speed rail in each Country is the best solution
@@mircocosm6805 air travel isn't trying to travel through a thousand km vacuum tunnel. Air travel proved itself to be useful and has been in use for 50+ years. Hyperloop is still considered scienxe fiction since it was first concieved in the 1930s not by Musk.
@@mircocosm6805 if building the tunnel isn't impossible, it is impractical and very wasteful. Your talking about thousands of km of tunnel each in ~100m sections that all need seals that can hold a vacuum. Thats thousands of potential failure points. Oh, and you need thousands of pumps running non stop to keep the vaccum, so theres another few thousand points of failure. When metal is in the sun it expands. Over the length of the tunnel the top side facing the sun would expand ~100m more than the bottom. The high speeds require massive turning radius so hundreds of kms of tunnel would need to be dug through mountains and houses would need to be bulldozed to make way for the tunnel. Heat expansion would also make the steel tunnel expand/contract as much as a couple hundred meters throughout the year. This is ok for an oil pipeline bc we can put in flexible joints every so often but, that cannot be done with hyperloop. When governments invest in public transportation they take a close look at how many riders can get moved by the system in a given time, like how many thousands of people a day it can move. Hyperloop with its tiny yet spacious pods can not move enough people to be viable.... +so many other issues i dont have time to list. Any real engineer knows this thing is a scam.
@@mircocosm6805 if this were actually made the costs would be astronomical. I dont care how cheap Elon thinks it would be. The maintenance alone would bankrupt a country. He says $20 a ticket? If the man doesnt know hes lying then he must be delusional. This whole thing is actually kinda sad. Wasted money and talent that should be put toward real proven solutions like high speed rail.
I agree and wonder myself. Except the rent will not skyrocket anywhere. In fact, rent will become cheaper. Demand will no longer be intense at any one location. Living costs will be more affordable to attract a resident to move there. It's just a thought. I'm not an ecconomist.
Only the wealthy can afford current high-speed surface lines, like Shinkansen, Acela, Eurostar, so it's complete hogwash to justify hyperloop on the promise of access to affordable housing. Anyone who needs to care about that will never be able to afford to ride it.
As a retired Steel-Fixer I find this channel a great source for the latest construction inovations. I remember when we had to rely on the Jackers Journal (Construction News)
Problem with this video is there's all this hype, and within that hype are people who call any criticism "hate", so the video probably would do bad. But yeah I agree, there's a lot of problems, a lot!
When I was in high school a teacher said that one day every car would have a phone in it. The entire class erupted in laughter and we all thought she was high or something to have said something so crazy. There is no reason this can't be done and most likely will be done. The technology does not seem so outlandish at all. And, as stated below, I believe EM is currently working on something very similar. I about flipped out the first time I saw a 3d printer and that seems way more difficult than a really fast train in a tube. If we don't imagine things, they don't happen. Great Vid.
Phones have been in cars since the 60's, if you could afford it. its not complicated technology, this is completely different, if they make it work it will be so expense and unreliable only the very rich will be able to afford it.
Also what is a law in our countries, "Dont drive and talk on your phone" therefore since the introduction of cell phones, wireless phones are very much a standard thing these days. Who knew that a phone could be carried around in one's pocket or used while driving.
Technical difficulties aside, the economics would be grim. The overwhelming number of surface vehicle trips are for short distances. People tend to live relatively close to work sites; few people commute over the distances the proposed hyperloop would serve. Hyperloops would compete with airlines, not cars, trollies and busses. Unlike the showplace transportation systems in places like China, American systems are expected to pay their way. The Concorde SST was a safe, reliable vehicle, but there never were more than a dozen and a half in service. They were money losers from the start.
Eoroloop is questionable, since it connects some rather small cities and would mostly help politicians. Would make more sense to connect Amsterdam - Brussels and Bonn - Dortmund and then connect it to London and Paris...
Martin Aerni yep Just not worth even considering this crap in Europe... our trains are already good enough, you don’t need to waste resources just to cut 30 minutes from a journey
Oh, let the MEPs build their own private Hyperloop. Then we can wait for the project to blow up in their brainless heads, and see all those politicians buy the farm
The EU-loop does not make sense. This are most very small cities, only 'political' power. Also the EU has 500 million people, while US only people. So the EU will have about 3 hyperloops in your study. There are 2 big metropolean regions called blue banana and yellow banana. One is from London, Amsterdam, Germany west cities, then south to Italy metropolian region in Madrid and way down to Rome. Another one would be in eastern europa connecting this region to the west most likely trough Austria. And last a northern line, which connects this area far away with the other two lines most likely in Germany. The most big advantage of the EU over US is the small distances, which is far more attractive for connecting the whole EU with 3 hyperloops - west (including south), east and north region.
Government doesn't solve problems. Free market capitalism does. Vacuum tube trains are a government project and will fail before the first tube ever sucks.
@@pierreemerick-aubameyang1096 Great point. I would be lying if I were to either say yes or no to that question, as I do not have enough data in terms of whether enough people would use the hyperloop to connect to the aforementioned cities, but please allow me to speculate. Looking at the frequency of flights between Johannesburg, Cape Town and Durban, and how packed our national roads become on weekends and public holidays when people drive back home from these major cities (most South Africans only go to the cities for work purposes but otherwise live or hail from rural areas) I would say the market is there. Now if the Hyperloop system can be as affordable as a plane ticket or a full tank of fuel in a typical car, couple that with the re-education of our people to so that they can abandon the car, the Hyperloop system can (THEORETICALLY) be profitable. We certainly do have a road crisis as our roads cannot handle its daily traffic, plus the death toll on the roads is way too high. The only viable alternative that we have is flying, but our flight routes are extremely inflexible. This system would be welcomed with open arms. What do you think?
@@letsoverthink2548 The Hyperloop is a scam. Any engineer will tell you that even the ones working on it know it's impossible to nake a reality. I think the RND they are doing on the Hyperloop is for other stiff like rockets (Or at least I hope that's what they are doing otherwise they are wasting time and money).
Imagine travelling at ridiculous speeds through a vacuum tube in a highly geologically unstable region, especially Japan and California. One slight ground shift and you're screwed
XD you are talking about 1100 kph and 320 kph difference. Today Japanese are building 500 kph line which is still almost 2 times slower than a hyperloop
@@GloriousSquizoKing. So you basically said that we don't need any progress. If something exists we don't have to push any further and we don't have to try to do things better. Typical conservative closed mindset.
@@DudesaQQ Were did i said that we don't need any progress? All i said is that assuming that the hyperloop is *already* faster than the fastest train in Japan, when that thing is not even build yet, is just bullshit.
Toronto-Ottawa-Montréal. Almost 60% of the population in Canada lives on the east coast, this connecting its cities would help it grow. Plus housing in Toronto is expensive, and less so in Montreal and Ottawa.
@@camiloportela6399 I totally agree, and it would be worth it! I was just saying that the daily commute option only works for densely populated very large areas with stops every 300km like in the great lakes area, the NYC/DC metropolis, western europe, scandinavia, India,... There you can have daily commute options like Paris/Amsterdam, NYC/Philadelphia,... It's not that the very long options aren't worth it but they won't deeply change anything, just a cheaper and slighly faster option, with a reduction of about 30%. The genius idea of hyperloop is that you could catch it in the city centers like any train or subway, with the same amount of processing/wait. If you save 90 mins in wating, security checks,... then suddenly using this mode of transportation for a shorter trip is possible whereas the vancouver montreal trip would still take 3hours
@Gordon Boadi : Said "Toronto is expensive, and less so in Montreal and Ottawa". The housing in Montreal and Ottawa will get just as expensive if Hyperloop gets there, assuming it works. The most expensive housing is always that within commuting time of a major centre, so your idea wil backfire.
Could you imagine living in Melbourne and then getting up at 5:30 in the morning to catch a hyper loop to Brisbane for work? Also, I think you could’ve made an honorable mentions list with a Midwest hyperloop. It could connect Cleveland, Detroit, Indianapolis, Chicago, Milwaukee, and the twin cities.
No, hyperloop is not possible with current technology and would be a safety and logistics nightmare. It would be too expensive for the average commuter and commuting such large distances is an incredible waste of resources no matter who it is doing it or how, ive nearer where you work, remote meetings, etc, minimize travel. You don't want people commuting over 2000km regularly, it is a stupid idea, a highspeed railway is there for essential journeys and occasional pleasure journeys, but freight is where such a railway would really shine in wide open countries like Aus/US by replacing polluting road/air freight while being quicker than sea and allowing for deliveries inland.
@@5688gamble Indeed, Australia has unfortunately put off the VFT idea and subsequent variants off for too long and now waste money on feasibility studies, if HSR can’t get it’s wheels going, Maglev and Hyperloop probably won’t.
Martin Kozon and right now that is flying. Nothing currently beats it unless you’re very tight knit like Europe. Otherwise it’s much easier to build 2 airports and fly between them than one extremely long rail line.
there's no way that Italy can turn into Greece, it's an ignorance mistake to say something like that. Italy it's still one of the most industrialized countries in the world and also is one if not the most important country for anythign related to style/fashion and design.Greece's economy has only tourism and maybe some little industry.
marmavit that’s still Italy’s problem. Almost everything there can be done elsewhere. The whole fashion and design can be done in France/England/Turkey or America. When it comes to other industry, so much of it owned by international countries that they could move the whole operation elsewhere.
The costs of labour and civil works in Australia are major barriers. However, we do know that the cost of construction would be much lower than for the proposed Brisbane-Melbourne conventional high-speed rail.
An LA to Vegas hyperloop seems like a pretty good option. I personally live in Vegas and have family in LA, so I wouldnt mind the 4-5 hour car ride being cut down at all.
Hey, shut up, the country is still bad at the core. The sugarcoating won’t help a rotten centre. The countries focus should be on the people, education and housing not these layered improvements.
Praful chandravanshi and finally, you are trying to say that India gained independence in 1947 whilst Singapore gained independence in 1965 and Hong Kong in 1999. These countries seem to have fared much better. Therefore, it is important that we look towards such countries and develop and strengthen the core of the system in education and sanitation and banking before trying to develop the topmost layer.
Living in Montevideo it was a pleasant surprise to see the Mercosur loop included! Maybe it could also be a closed loop, since there are many large cities along Brazil’s coast south of Sao Paulo, and it could also connect the popular Uruguayan resort of Punta del Este (a prime destination for Argentines, Uruguayans and Brazilians alike). Great video!
I'm argentinian and I'd rather have a proper railway infrastructure and a bigger metro system in Buenos Aires first. Freight and passenger railroads are incredibly underdeveloped thanks to political decisions in the 90s to abandon existing routes which left behind innumerable ghost towns in favor of a container trucks mafia.
I think a coastal railroad Montevideo-Sao Paulo would be amazing for both countries. It could pass through big cities like Porto Alegre, Florianopolis and Curitiba too. It could even be extended north to Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Recife and Fortaleza and South to Buenos Aires all the way to Santiago del Chile. Its such a good idea that we could see it become a reality in our lifetimes, country neighbor.
I Think there shoud be an idea to conect Central Europe. There shoud be 2 Main Routes: L1: (Bordeaux - )Paris - Luxembourg - Frankfurt - Stuttgart - Munich - Vienna - Budapest (-Buckarest) L2: London - Paris - Brussels - Cologne - Berlin - Warsaw (- Minsk - Moskau) And one Connectionline: Copenhagen - Hamburg - Cologne - Frankfurt - Strassbourg - Geneva - Turin - Milano - Florenz - Rome - Naples So You can get from east to West and from north to south very quickly without Passing Alps or Pyrenees at a long distance
I mean Canada has a tiny population, so really, it doesn't need Hyperloop ASAP. I am not saying that Canada doesn't deserve it, I just don't see it making much sense in terms of logistics.
The argument for most of these routes is about cheaper housing. But then first of all you will be connecting city centers which won't be cheap anyway, and second, as soon as the loop's being built housing price will skyrocket making the local population unable to afford it.
Seattle to LA. 3 major port towns along the west coast. Interstate 5 currently is the limiting factor to the growth of the entire region. Large dams to provide cheap energy and a old and failing rail infrastructure to replace.
Maglev trains are currently proposed between Vancouver and Portland, but the hyperloop had been dismissed as an option so far. No one wants to be first!
Gerrad Reynolds with that infrastructure it would allow for expansion away from the dense and very expensive areas. Though the best solution is to start building larger affordable housing areas
The Quebec-Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto-London-Detroit route should have been included. It has so many more connection possibilities, West to Chicago, south to Atlanta. The B1M always seems to have a bias against Canada.
For sure it would have been better than putting the British hyperloop or the Euroloop, 2 useless (and irrelevant for the rest of the world in Britain's case) things
@Nathaniel Tesfaye lol, he was speaking about London in Ontario. I've never understood why so many places in the Americas are called like the originals in Europe. Be creative guys
Realistically, start by getting the Texan politicians to watch this video and then explain how it could boost the states economy ( i. e. Beaucoup Bucks...$$$..and essentially the hyperloop would pay for itself ). Also explain, whoever ( i.e. The politician that gets this started and seen to the end could basically write his own ticket into the white house. )
Kishore Mergu. I hope you are doing well right now. When you say: Wow. The Next Generation will be so Happy.. Are you saying that because the idea of Hyperloop looks great for our future? If you are, I want like for you to read my post I left on this site. After you read my post are you still happy for our next Generation? I want a better America as much as you do Kishore. I think we need to realize that it is one thing to invent great idea's about being a more freedom based Society, As long as we look at how our Government has handled this great idea's through generation's of the past to present. Let's look at some history Kishore. In America between 1920 and 1939, Depending on the on the area. It took about 23 years to fully replace the cheap buggy, Starting from the Model T was made in volume in 1916, To the end of the Great Depression in 1939. So. Looking at history, The making of a Model T back in 1916 was a very happy time right? But, In 2019 as I type this 103 years later, We are trying to replace the so called great day man invented the Model T?? So Kishore. Could you please help me out right now? Because I really need some help right now. Are we smarter now then we were in 1916? And if we in fact are smarter, Just how did we become more intelligent? I can't wait to hear your answer. Larry. Can we answer your question? Is anyone welcome to answer? Absolutely! I want all humans to teach me me about how man is getting smarter as we go forward. Remember. At the time we were making the Model T in 1916 which was a great idea at the time, Apparently looking back, Man was dumb because now we are smarter. Seriously?
A great hyperloop possibility for Canada that definitely should be discussed is from Halifax, Nova Scotia on the Atlantic Coast all the way over to Vancouver, British Columbia in the Pacific Northwest. This route would make a fantastic candidate for a hyperloop because of the vast distances between all of Canada's major cities and the fact that they are all basically in a straight route along the southern portion of the country. You can go all the way from Halifax, Nova Scotia to Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island to Moncton, New Brunswick to Québec City, Québec to Montreal, Québec to Ottawa, Ontario to Toronto, Ontario to Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario to Winnipeg, Manitoba to Regina, Saskatchewan to Calgary, Alberta and finally to Vancouver, British Columbia. 🚄💨🚇🛤️🔁👍🏻🙂
@@nachcam yeah, it would probably make more sense to start by linking our major cities using tried and tested high speed rail, which we still have none of currently lol
@@eclogite seriously, if we are going to keep expanding our numbers through immigration, at least give us something out of it like high speed rail across the country.
Take it straight from an engineer that hyperloop is not viable. Just think one bullet hole and it collapses. Technically it is feasible but the cost will be prohibitive. Bullet trains are much cheaper and work. Hyperloop was derived from hyperbole.
A decent level of capacity at the proposed speeds and pod sizes would be impossible to achieve, and the energy and time required to maintain a perfect vacuum would outweigh any benefits over high-speed rail. It's nonsensical.
7:52 why are you mentioning Düsseldorf and Cologne, but don't show them as part of the route? Makes no sense! The entire Rhine-Ruhr metropolitan area got 10 million inhabitants, Germanys largest metro area
The Rhine-Ruhr loop connected with the harbours of Antwerp and Rotterdam would more likely be build as a cargo line not one for people. for companies there is way more money in that.
As a Texan who lives in the Dallas/Fort Worth area, I can agree with this 100 percent. We need a better way to connect our major cities in the "Texas Triangle" than interstates 10, 35, and 45. A hyperloop would help eliminate the need to drive for HOURS between the cities.
Hyperloop is just a worse version of high speed rail. It doesn't matter if hyperloop is faster than high speed rail because the hyperloop is an individual pod, while high speed train is a high capacity train, so high speed rail will move more people way faster and more efficiently.
I cant wait for the Sacramento to San Diego Hyper Loop! I live in the SF Bay Area and I always travel down to LA and San Diego, so I feel like the California Hyper Loop will help me travel the state even better and faster.
The length required for the Hyperloop to accelerate and decelerate is not in consideration in this video. Linking those close cities would be both technically and economically impractical. But it's still a great video!
Those cities arr being proposed for hyperloop construction because They are too far...goddamit...just study how easily an object in vacuum space can be stopled
Hyperloops is known for its speed. But how about the capacity of the pods and trains? In this video you are talking about connecting tens of millions at once and commuting, this would mean that huge capacities are needed at once in rush hour. In Europe they have introduced double dekker trains and even double dekker TGV's. And saving time compare to airport's security and checkins: will this not be needed for such transport method?
This! - How many seats are in each 'pod' - how long is a pod, will be be multiple pods running a train like system? Every damn video shows only 1 pod and I'm like... how is this efficient? A train will hold more.
The supposed advantages of hyperloops are entirely mythical. You mention just a couple of examples. Demand for travel peaks at certain times of the day and capacity and security are certainly some of hyperloop's many flaws. Elon Musk suggests some barking mad ideas at times ! Making rocket fuel on Mars is another example.
@@pasoundman Thank you for your input on these issues. Elon has red your comment and will stop all operations immediately. Thanks! you saved him billions of dollars because of course, knowing so much more than he and his company does he just realized that he is indeed mad and listened to reason! Oh and also i'm pretty sure you would've been part of the people trying to stop the wright brothers trying to fly, because heh, they're barking mad and the plane has many flaws..... STFU man
Thanks for the shout out, and personally I think it would be great for Australia, but I just don't think we are very good at planning ahead. I live in Brisbane, and we been debating a flood control dam here since 74. 46 years on and 2 more floods later, we are where we started.
@@Msoy1999 No, that would be a fucking garbage idea. It would cost an insane amount of money to set up when the human demand for travel between those two points in relatively tiny.
Wait what about the heat from being exposed to the sun for thousands of kilometers causing the pipe to buckle then implode due to the vacuum seal failing and everybody dying instantly from the crash.
@@markcostello5120 The tube is built with expansion joints. This would appear to be being taken into account, hence prototypes being built in desert areas.
The Quebec City-Windsor Corridor (French: Corridor Québec-Windsor) is the most densely populated and heavily industrialized region of Canada. As its name suggests, the region extends between Quebec City in the northeast and Windsor, Ontario in the southwest, spanning 1,150 kilometres (710 mi). With more than 18 million people, it contains about half of the country's population,
Hyperloop is just a worse version of high speed rail. It doesn't matter if hyperloop is faster than high speed rail because the hyperloop is an individual pod, while high speed train is a high capacity train, so high speed rail will move more people way faster and more efficiently.
I would love to connect lahore and karachi to UAE and new York, and big European cities , start from Karachi and cover all cities of Pakistan and villages of Pakistan
Interpol I live in the Baltimore area too. I really do wish we had a high speed line besides Amtrak connecting the 5 cities. Why drive for an hour to DC when you can just hop on the hyperloop and get to Union station in 20 minutes
I would extend the Boston-DC all the way to Savannah through Atlanta, Charleston, the Research Triangle, Norfolk and Richmond, the California loop to Vancouver through Seattle, Portland and Eugene, also possibly south down the Baja. And a midwest loop of Chicago, Milwaukee, Madison, Minneapolis, Des Moines, Omaha, Kansas City, St Louis, Memphis, Nashville, Lexington, Cincinnati, Columbus, Cleveland, Toledo, Detroit, Lancing, Grand Rapids, Gary, Chicago witb perhaps 2 sub loops Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Gary and St Louis, Springfield, Bloomington, Joliet, Chicago would provide good places to connect the other 3 American loops (KC, Tulsa, Oklahoma City, Dallas) (Cleveland, Erie, Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, Buffalo, NYC) (Omaha, Denver, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas, Phoenix, LA) recreating much of the original transcontinental rail system
I think instead of the EU loop you propose here splitting the EU up into 3 or 4 lines would make more sense. Here are some ideas for lines I had: Route 1 (western North-South line): Warsaw - Berlin - Rotterdam/The Hague - Antwerp - Brussels - Paris - Bordeaux - Bilbao - Madrid - Lisbon Route 2 (West-East line): Manchester - London - Paris - Zurich - Innsbruck - Vienna - Budapest Route 3 (eastern North-South line): Copenhagen - Hamburg - Berlin - Prague - Vienna - Zagreb - Sarajevo - Tirana - Athens Route 4 (Baltic-Italian line): Helsinki - Tallinn - Riga - Vilnius - Warsaw - Vienna - Venice - Rome Hubs of these lines would become: Paris, Berlin, Warsaw and Vienna I know most of these lines are likely geopolitically not feasible but it was a fun idea :)
I think the golden triangle in india is a perfect route for hyperloop.I think there is a hyperloop project in india.Its from Mumbai to Pune.But still l love B1M
Could potentially link with California’s hyperloop and turn the west coast into a single massive economy with two distinct & heavily cooperative megalopolises
During the time of President McKinley, there was a plan to build an extension across the Bering Straits to link with the transiberian and then go from Anchorage to someplace in Chile. The British would have lost a lot of shipping contracts to the railroads
In India, the plan is for diamond quadrilateral based on Golden quadrilateral. Never heard any plans to directly connect Mumbai with Kolkata. Because there are no big/ developed cities between them. The plan is to provide HSR between Mumbai Delhi Kolkata Chennai Bangalore to Mumbai. Indian Govt will work on other projects only after these routes are completed. Other routes only possible if State govt wants to construct then on their own.
Esa ruta es ideal. Poríamos agregar en un extremo a Puerto Vallarta y Nayarit y en el otro Puebla y el puerto de Veracruz para que quede una ruta del Golfo al Pacífico.
The EU loop I think it's near useless. A madrid-barcelona-paris-brussels-amsterdam-berlin-munich would be more useful I think
These hyperloop plans are based on a lot of research. The one in this video was probably the best first option for Europe, considering all aspects. One can't just connect major cities that are far apart. One needs to calculate possible use and if that use makes it viable or not.
geography makes it really hard, this is long vast distances that need to go through mountains, water, terrain etc.. all in very safe and economically viable way
Tunnels or will be required in most cases. If you see how many tunnels European countries have built, it won't be a big problem to do the same with a hyperloop.
And from Munich to Vienna and maybe from there into te east
well, it could go all the way from Malaga/Spain to Tallin/Estonia
5:20 Oh don't worry, Wuhan became VERY influential recently.
Waiting for that comment
inFLUential
Haha 🤣🤣🤣
I came here to see any reference of "Wuhan" ... I was so right 😂
yeah, I think a list involving high speed global connectivity is a tough sell for Wu Wu in the future.
hypothesizing about a California route when it’s trying build a train track for 20 years?
Not really, since united state always failing in infrastructure between 1920 - 1960, everyone wasn't expecting united states could be a superpower from 1970, they made owning a car much easier and cheaper, air travel became more common, lots of paved way across the country, don't underestimate
the chances of california building a gadgetbahn is greater than high capacity high speed rail imo.
@@herbertant4096 nah face the reality the us can't build anymore it's only barely renovating now
@@herbertant4096 cheaper? What, paying for insurance, gas, and everything else, makes cars very, very inefficient
5:23 Wuhan surely didn't need Hyperloop to become influential
There 50 micron "partical" travels faster around the world that hyperloop 😂
Yeah. Maybe we should bypass that city until they get their yucky markets under control.
@@boxsterman77 BOYCOTT Chinese products & services
Thinking the same thing lol
Dom Bul I laughed too hard at that I’m sorry 😂
It is odd watching this at a time when the world is literally shut in and shut down.
Slowly reopening
Unless you are in the US
Yes, but it is right after the worst times and tragedies that regions of the world have made great leaps forward.
1.Delhi to chennai: via Jaipur, Ahemadabad,Mumbai,Pune,goa Hyderabad,Bengaluru.
2.Delhi to Hyderabad: via Lucknow, Varanasi, Ranchi, Kolkata, Bhubaneshwar, vishakapatanam.
3.Mumbai to Thiruvananthapuram: via Pune, Goa, Mangalore, kannur, Calicut, Kochi.
@Mr Perfect Nope. Delhi-Mumbai is an ongoing project. Google DGWHyperloop.
Mr.perfect cheaper work force is now not a priority anymore. Because now everything is moving towards gig economy especially in high populated countries
@@shantanujoshi290 u a shameless person
@@shantanujoshi290 such a shameless person
@@nikhilsingh4689 dhek bhai joh bhi keh.. idgaf about you
Lol just need a hyperloop from my bed to the coffee machine
Cool
If i was u i would bring coffie machine to my bed permanently
glitch gamer smarttt
In Russia we bring coffee to our wives.
Yeas, we don't allow them to carry hot things, heavy things, any kind of hazardous things.
Unlike you, western welfareboys.
Haha
Says, "affordable" just as Birmingham pops up on the map...
Affordable for the rich, we hopefully not in the slum..
@@deiniolbythynnwr926 There is no room in the UK for racist's like you.
@@deiniolbythynnwr926 less talking, more deporting. Lol
Deiniol Bythynnwr racist
Evan 😂
Do you have any concept of insanely high cost of building a hyperloop? Just the tunnel would be prohibitive, then you need to build a pipe that can withstand the vacuum pressure, then a vehicle that protects the occupants from the deadly vacuum, then the maglev system, etc., etc. Sorry, but hyperloop is just one of Elon Musk's ridiculous pipe dreams.
Never going to happen.
Don't forget the insane amount of security that would be needed for passengers and all along the tube.
Hyperloop is a failure in so many levels before it even starts.
@@zen1647 exactly! I think there is actually a chance for it to work, just look at the history of the aviation industry, but some real clever minds were behind that project. Having Elon the head of this project is going to be a catastrophe just like the Vegas looo
@@zen1647 lol someone drops a cigarette...
it's now a hot tamale at 800 mph!
‘On the cusp of becoming reality’ within same sentence ‘no funding from any government is forthcoming’ nothing to see here move along.
Exactly. Unfortunately a thumbs down for this video. I like mindless entertainment and dumbening down over time, but there is a limit to how mindless I can be.
Tired AF 66????
Horrible clickbait title. I reported it and I suggest others do the same. Here's what I reported. "Title states 10 hyper loops that WILL change the world, yet the video states NO governments or private companies have committed to or even are looking at possible investment. Then proceeds to detail 10 FANTASY hyper loops that might maybe possibly be built, pure fiction and baseless speculation."
but it actually is now, it aged well
@@slabriprock5329 I bet your very fun at parties
Portland, Seattle, Vancouver BC. Oregon, Washington state and British Columbia all are in talks to link all three cities together
Or their could be a connection from the California line that heads through redding, eugene, and salem before connecting to a PNW line.
Hyperloops biggest benefit would come from linking small towns to major cities, for example, hagerstown MD, to baltimore or washington DC, by car its 1.5 hours, with no traffic. With rails like this, you could live in the country, where its cheap, theres no traffic, and little crime, then commute into the city no problem.
They can call it the Mayo loop.
@@thegeth4293 disagree, they need demand right off the bat to get profit. Once they prove the concept is profitable, they can expand out to smaller cities.
The California Bullet Train is on a good way, so why not!
Not only are all these projects pipe dreams, but I especially loved the hyperloop concept through seismically super active Honshu, Japan. What could ever go wrong?
They said the same thing about building giant skyscrapers around regions like Japan and surrounding Asian countries. But look what happened. Humans adapt over time, nothing is impossible.
@@euphoria667 it's not efficient else would have already took place. + Easy to sabotage, just find a way to get that vacuum tube to have a blast of air and your system fell apart pretty quickly. It's Vunerable and hell as expensive so not worth any money.
Skyscrapers still have their problems and aren't sustainable means. They however could be solution to Alot crammed space but for that it's not big enough issue Everywhere. It's just that Alot of parking spaces are there.
@@euphoria667 this is a dumb comparison; a false equivalency. The hyper loop is not going to fix anything that we can’t with existing assets. A really fast train can do the job just as well if not better if we actually invest on it. The hyper loop concept has been in the drafts since 1799. If it was actually possible wouldn’t you think we would have something at least resembling a vacuum pressurized tube train by now? Elon Musk is not Tony Stark, stop sucking him off. Also just because something isn’t impossible doesn’t mean it’s efficient or a good idea at all.
@@masterchief5603 There are two types of skyscrapers, exorbitant super tall skyscrapers made as a landmark and prestige for the country and those that simply serve residential services and rarely ornamental.
Well, yeah, the projects are _literally_ pipe dreams, but...
A Hyperloop from LA to Las Vegas would pay for itself in a month
For that to be effective, the station on the LA side would require a hellishly large parking lot and the station in Vegas would have to take up a lot of high-end real estate close to the Strip or have good public transport connections. Connecting the two cities is the easy part of Hyperloop, the great problem lies in the stations and how to transport people to and from them.
LOL
Wouldn't earth quakes pose a problem for such a loop? I always assumed thats why L.A. doesnt have a subway system!
No. It would be the world's largest and most expensive single-use mass murder machine.
But you're a thoughtless fool - so you don't understand this fact.
Chris Davies and how is it a “mass murder machine”?
Japan is currently working on a maglev train line from Tokyo to Osaka through Nagoya. Why would they forgo it for hyperloop??
Also since the hyperloop concept entails personal transport, no line in itself makes any sense, only a network of lines can compete with trains
Because Maglev trains actually function in the real world whereas the hyperloop is just marketing bullshit.
@@kristoffer3000 | Marketing bullshit maybe, but then a lot of folks were saying that of electric cars not so long ago. The pace of development of evacuated tube transport, incorporating maglev is astounding and would be like space travel, on earth - but as you claim, maybe all ‘hot air’, or ‘hot vacuum’ but not if they can overcome the engineering challenges along the way - all those student projects in various universities are loving the challenge. Also Richard Branson invested a lot of money in Hyperloop One, now Virgin Hyperloop One... we will see what transpires...
@@macro325mike It'll never be reality because it's so deeply flawed from the get go, a tiny hole would make the vacuum impossible to maintain, the heat expansion on a length of tube like that is incredible and we already know what can happen to railroad tracks that get hot, they look like snakes on the ground, it's also incredibly dangerous if there's a leak because the shockwave of air would tear things to shreds.
It's cool tech but it's nothing new and it hasn't been built before because it's not fit for the real world.
@@kristoffer3000 railroad tracks? Did you compare maglev tracks in hyperloops to railroad tracks?
@@kristoffer3000 it’d make the most sense while being underground, so many oil pipelines can be maintained so why not this?
BM1 has gone from being full of good information on actual projects to more a promotion tool for fiction in many cases.
Agreed
K foamer
@@penskepc2374 hyperloop _is_ fiction though. You're the foamer here
@@domesticcat1725 cope, foamer
@@penskepc2374n which Elon Musk resuscitates a daffy idea from the 19th century, presents it as his own, and wins the gasps and adulation of, essentially, suckers.
Four years later we can compare and contrast with a whole deck of non-starter Musky notions and…
Hey! Strings of linked teleportation booths all over the place would be much better, and only a little less practical than hyper loops!
He’s a fraud, kids.
(And this video is a terrible, terrible embarrassment. Should be deleted, ASAP.)
Hyperloop has the same problem as monorail, it's theoretically better than current infrastructure, but trains can already run on current infrastructure and gradual improvements are easier to implement.
better for industry because they can take their time making the changes, where as innovators produce the new technology now that Industry will struggle to catch up to for another 15 years. that's why we still burn fossil fuels instead of converting to all solar/wind/wave energy production, if SWW was the only source of energy, you can guarantee they would suddenly become very efficient and affordable very quickly, instead of making the transition over decades.
Hyperloop just doesn't work in real life though.
@@kristoffer3000 yup, and even if it was possible there'd be hundreds of reasons why it would fail as a mass transit system
@@RIXRADvidz simply put, meglev exist idk why peeps want something like meglev in vacuum tube. Btw why not just have a connected two ways big engine than individual pods? Wait isn't that just energy capacity issue? Why not have a electric bar line to supply power, oh boi another train 🚆.
Also to be honest meglev project also has good amount of losses that are still happening + it's pretty expensive to place up against conventional rail lines even if working on electric power and they exist. Sabotage is another issue of these loops as it renders everything to stop while railways keeps things going as it is. So for compensation of more speed this all weaknesses and losses are induced. Right.. (sigh)
I'd love to see Los Angeles - Vegas - Salt Lake - Denver - Omaha - Des Moines - Chicago - New York
LA and Vegas are too far south. I think it could start at San Francisco then the mentioned, Pittsburgh, and New York City.
Basically one that runs alongside I-80 until you hit Salt Lake City. Could be feasible, most of the land is already cleared, and because it runs along one of the most important Interstates, every town in between would be a valuable stop.
@@razor3106 I think if the line is already coming from LA to SF, why make another directly from LA to west. Its going north anyway. It could go Vegas, La, Sf, and go east from there
It is much more feasible and beneficial to join the cities along the coasts rather than east to west. East to West is optimal for flight. You need to optimize the number of people with the shortest tubes - crossing the country is not efficient.
@@katjerouac trying to cycle the homeless by seasons???
None of this would be affordable for the working or middle class.
Hyperloop is just a useless projects: more high speed rail in each Country is the best solution
That's what they said about air travel
@@mircocosm6805 air travel isn't trying to travel through a thousand km vacuum tunnel. Air travel proved itself to be useful and has been in use for 50+ years. Hyperloop is still considered scienxe fiction since it was first concieved in the 1930s not by Musk.
@@mircocosm6805 if building the tunnel isn't impossible, it is impractical and very wasteful. Your talking about thousands of km of tunnel each in ~100m sections that all need seals that can hold a vacuum. Thats thousands of potential failure points. Oh, and you need thousands of pumps running non stop to keep the vaccum, so theres another few thousand points of failure. When metal is in the sun it expands. Over the length of the tunnel the top side facing the sun would expand ~100m more than the bottom. The high speeds require massive turning radius so hundreds of kms of tunnel would need to be dug through mountains and houses would need to be bulldozed to make way for the tunnel. Heat expansion would also make the steel tunnel expand/contract as much as a couple hundred meters throughout the year. This is ok for an oil pipeline bc we can put in flexible joints every so often but, that cannot be done with hyperloop. When governments invest in public transportation they take a close look at how many riders can get moved by the system in a given time, like how many thousands of people a day it can move. Hyperloop with its tiny yet spacious pods can not move enough people to be viable.... +so many other issues i dont have time to list. Any real engineer knows this thing is a scam.
@@mircocosm6805 if this were actually made the costs would be astronomical. I dont care how cheap Elon thinks it would be. The maintenance alone would bankrupt a country. He says $20 a ticket? If the man doesnt know hes lying then he must be delusional. This whole thing is actually kinda sad. Wasted money and talent that should be put toward real proven solutions like high speed rail.
@@mircocosm6805 air travel is still not affordable as a daily commute as is suggested of hyperloop in this video.
I would love to see a Hyperloop going: Chicago - Detroit - Toronto - Ottawa - Montreal - Quebec City.
It will take a lot of pumps to keep the air out with all of the bullet holes.
Canada's cities lack population density. China leads HSR miles by far more than everyone else combined. Close cities with high population
me to but it could be better used in California
Don't forget to throw in Halifax!
Also Toronto is featured at 13:22
One of the highest quality channels on youtube, for sure. Love the fact that south america wasn’t forgotten like usual, too!
Thank you so much!! We love our viewers!
Romaoplays my.. did...fand...ame....canj...karon...amra...moron...sel....no...bad...cola....good...cola...balo....porkalar...jono.....u...i....pere...maind...enjo...good.....
I'd love a Monterrey - Guadalajara - CDMX one.
I mean, there's no way I could afford a travel, but definely this route could be a ver usefull one.
Tijuana all the northern Mexican cities in the desert to Monterrey
The train is a better option than the hyperloop.
How is any of those smaller cities still "affordable" once it's linked to the hyperloop? Rents will triple the day the hyperloop is finished.
Why don't you close your mouth and keep having no idea how the economy works
@@OK-ws7ti What are you, 16?
I agree and wonder myself. Except the rent will not skyrocket anywhere. In fact, rent will become cheaper. Demand will no longer be intense at any one location. Living costs will be more affordable to attract a resident to move there. It's just a thought. I'm not an ecconomist.
Buy a house before the hyperloop finishes?
Only the wealthy can afford current high-speed surface lines, like Shinkansen, Acela, Eurostar, so it's complete hogwash to justify hyperloop on the promise of access to affordable housing. Anyone who needs to care about that will never be able to afford to ride it.
This is simply superb..the Golden Triangle in India interconnected by hyperloop ..!
Paisa kaun dega
As a retired Steel-Fixer I find this channel a great source for the latest construction inovations. I remember when we had to rely on the Jackers Journal (Construction News)
Can you also make a video stating the difficulty or problems preventing the ascension of the hyperloop.. what are the technical hurdles
Problem with this video is there's all this hype, and within that hype are people who call any criticism "hate", so the video probably would do bad.
But yeah I agree, there's a lot of problems, a lot!
There are so many hurdles that it makes no sense. It can't be profitable.
Expense. Anything is possible if you throw enough money at it, but making economic sense is another matter.
@@SomeGuy-lw2po explain ..
Money
When I was in high school a teacher said that one day every car would have a phone in it. The entire class erupted in laughter and we all thought she was high or something to have said something so crazy. There is no reason this can't be done and most likely will be done. The technology does not seem so outlandish at all. And, as stated below, I believe EM is currently working on something very similar. I about flipped out the first time I saw a 3d printer and that seems way more difficult than a really fast train in a tube. If we don't imagine things, they don't happen. Great Vid.
yup....it's a matter of time.....it will be happened...
Phones have been in cars since the 60's, if you could afford it. its not complicated technology, this is completely different, if they make it work it will be so expense and unreliable only the very rich will be able to afford it.
Also what is a law in our countries, "Dont drive and talk on your phone" therefore since the introduction of cell phones, wireless phones are very much a standard thing these days. Who knew that a phone could be carried around in one's pocket or used while driving.
Your class owe an apology to your teacher
Technical difficulties aside, the economics would be grim. The overwhelming number of surface vehicle trips are for short distances. People tend to live relatively close to work sites; few people commute over the distances the proposed hyperloop would serve. Hyperloops would compete with airlines, not cars, trollies and busses. Unlike the showplace transportation systems in places like China, American systems are expected to pay their way. The Concorde SST was a safe, reliable vehicle, but there never were more than a dozen and a half in service. They were money losers from the start.
I would like to see the California line at the end of the vid extended up through Portland, Seattle, and finally Vancouver.
Agreed
Screw it make it go to Fairbanks lol 🤣
That would make way more sense than containing it to just California. Connect the whole west coast
Eoroloop is questionable, since it connects some rather small cities and would mostly help politicians. Would make more sense to connect Amsterdam - Brussels and Bonn - Dortmund and then connect it to London and Paris...
Martin Aerni yep
Just not worth even considering this crap in Europe... our trains are already good enough, you don’t need to waste resources just to cut 30 minutes from a journey
Oh, let the MEPs build their own private Hyperloop. Then we can wait for the project to blow up in their brainless heads, and see all those politicians buy the farm
The EU-loop does not make sense. This are most very small cities, only 'political' power. Also the EU has 500 million people, while US only people. So the EU will have about 3 hyperloops in your study. There are 2 big metropolean regions called blue banana and yellow banana. One is from London, Amsterdam, Germany west cities, then south to Italy metropolian region in Madrid and way down to Rome. Another one would be in eastern europa connecting this region to the west most likely trough Austria. And last a northern line, which connects this area far away with the other two lines most likely in Germany. The most big advantage of the EU over US is the small distances, which is far more attractive for connecting the whole EU with 3 hyperloops - west (including south), east and north region.
Government doesn't solve problems. Free market capitalism does. Vacuum tube trains are a government project and will fail before the first tube ever sucks.
Yeah! I think its stupid they should just do it within their country its way better that way.
Pretoria, Johannesburg, Cape Town, and Durban in South Africa would benefit from Hyperloop as well
@ggg my apologies but I fail to understand the point of your comment. is it a suggestion that the criminal issue is unique to South Africa?
Agreed. Cape Town-Port Elizabeth-Durban-Johannesburg-Pretoria. Could add George and East London as regional stops as well.
@@letsoverthink2548 idk for sure but are people rich enough on that route to make it even close to profitable
@@pierreemerick-aubameyang1096 Great point. I would be lying if I were to either say yes or no to that question, as I do not have enough data in terms of whether enough people would use the hyperloop to connect to the aforementioned cities, but please allow me to speculate. Looking at the frequency of flights between Johannesburg, Cape Town and Durban, and how packed our national roads become on weekends and public holidays when people drive back home from these major cities (most South Africans only go to the cities for work purposes but otherwise live or hail from rural areas) I would say the market is there. Now if the Hyperloop system can be as affordable as a plane ticket or a full tank of fuel in a typical car, couple that with the re-education of our people to so that they can abandon the car, the Hyperloop system can (THEORETICALLY) be profitable. We certainly do have a road crisis as our roads cannot handle its daily traffic, plus the death toll on the roads is way too high. The only viable alternative that we have is flying, but our flight routes are extremely inflexible. This system would be welcomed with open arms. What do you think?
@@letsoverthink2548 The Hyperloop is a scam. Any engineer will tell you that even the ones working on it know it's impossible to nake a reality. I think the RND they are doing on the Hyperloop is for other stiff like rockets (Or at least I hope that's what they are doing otherwise they are wasting time and money).
Imagine travelling at ridiculous speeds through a vacuum tube in a highly geologically unstable region, especially Japan and California. One slight ground shift and you're screwed
Yes, as everyone knows building infrastructure that can withstand earthquakes is beyond the limits of modern science.
Awesome video! Congrats for the hard work you put into it! Would love to travel by Hyperloop soon!
Japan doesn't need any more fast trains. When I went it was perfectly fine.
we need more, we are speed junkies
XD you are talking about 1100 kph and 320 kph difference. Today Japanese are building 500 kph line which is still almost 2 times slower than a hyperloop
@@DudesaQQ i doubt that something that *actually* exists is slower than the hyperloop.
@@GloriousSquizoKing. So you basically said that we don't need any progress. If something exists we don't have to push any further and we don't have to try to do things better.
Typical conservative closed mindset.
@@DudesaQQ Were did i said that we don't need any progress? All i said is that assuming that the hyperloop is *already* faster than the fastest train in Japan, when that thing is not even build yet, is just bullshit.
We need to see the hyperloop working first.
It may happen in our lifetimes but I don't think it's logistically possible in the near future.
I am absolutely hooked on this channel, I love every video!
Toronto-Ottawa-Montréal. Almost 60% of the population in Canada lives on the east coast, this connecting its cities would help it grow. Plus housing in Toronto is expensive, and less so in Montreal and Ottawa.
Add on Chicago/ Detroit too. Large population centeres just across the border.
Even with hyperloop, there's no way you could commute daily between the 2 coasts
@@camiloportela6399 I totally agree, and it would be worth it! I was just saying that the daily commute option only works for densely populated very large areas with stops every 300km like in the great lakes area, the NYC/DC metropolis, western europe, scandinavia, India,... There you can have daily commute options like Paris/Amsterdam, NYC/Philadelphia,...
It's not that the very long options aren't worth it but they won't deeply change anything, just a cheaper and slighly faster option, with a reduction of about 30%. The genius idea of hyperloop is that you could catch it in the city centers like any train or subway, with the same amount of processing/wait. If you save 90 mins in wating, security checks,... then suddenly using this mode of transportation for a shorter trip is possible whereas the vancouver montreal trip would still take 3hours
@Gordon Boadi : Said "Toronto is expensive, and less so in Montreal and Ottawa". The housing in Montreal and Ottawa will get just as expensive if Hyperloop gets there, assuming it works. The most expensive housing is always that within commuting time of a major centre, so your idea wil backfire.
Sorry for reviving an old thread, but why not do the whole Quebec-Windsor Corridor?
This would be a DREAM come TRUE
ahh the famous yang tee zee river
Was looking to see if I'd be the first, but you beat me to it!
I was rofling, too!
Hyperloop without the Hype is a Maglev
Lol, Hyper loop is 1000km/hr.
Maglev Max 300-400/hr.
& Technical Specification is Far More needed in HYPERLOOP.
@Audun Børve F to pay respects...an absolute fucking legend
@@jenimarai1906 *whisper* its a joke jenima
Nah hyperloop without the hype is nothing. It's nonsense, can never be economical.
5:53 "The Exotic Rooftop Restaurant" LOL
Smell the jealousy
Smell the jelousy
@@TommyTom21 oo ya !
Vancouver - Seattle - Tacoma - Portland - Salem
Milwaukee - Chicago - Toledo - Detroit - Toronto
Could you imagine living in Melbourne and then getting up at 5:30 in the morning to catch a hyper loop to Brisbane for work? Also, I think you could’ve made an honorable mentions list with a Midwest hyperloop. It could connect Cleveland, Detroit, Indianapolis, Chicago, Milwaukee, and the twin cities.
Haha I don’t think too many Melbournians would want to commute to Brisbane/Queensland at all.
@@affenket they do now
No, hyperloop is not possible with current technology and would be a safety and logistics nightmare. It would be too expensive for the average commuter and commuting such large distances is an incredible waste of resources no matter who it is doing it or how, ive nearer where you work, remote meetings, etc, minimize travel. You don't want people commuting over 2000km regularly, it is a stupid idea, a highspeed railway is there for essential journeys and occasional pleasure journeys, but freight is where such a railway would really shine in wide open countries like Aus/US by replacing polluting road/air freight while being quicker than sea and allowing for deliveries inland.
@@5688gamble Indeed, Australia has unfortunately put off the VFT idea and subsequent variants off for too long and now waste money on feasibility studies, if HSR can’t get it’s wheels going, Maglev and Hyperloop probably won’t.
Hyperloop is highly impractical, I don't see it getting materialized with the current technology.
In Italy it could be something like this: Turin-Milan-Florence-Rome-Naples
Not only Italy. Every country would benefit from a fast transportation system.
Italy should consider not turning into Greece first.
Martin Kozon and right now that is flying.
Nothing currently beats it unless you’re very tight knit like Europe.
Otherwise it’s much easier to build 2 airports and fly between them than one extremely long rail line.
there's no way that Italy can turn into Greece, it's an ignorance mistake to say something like that. Italy it's still one of the most industrialized countries in the world and also is one if not the most important country for anythign related to style/fashion and design.Greece's economy has only tourism and maybe some little industry.
marmavit that’s still Italy’s problem. Almost everything there can be done elsewhere. The whole fashion and design can be done in France/England/Turkey or America.
When it comes to other industry, so much of it owned by international countries that they could move the whole operation elsewhere.
The Brisbane to Melbourne route would be so helpful
Eyebis and a connection to New Zealander
Plus to Perth! That would be huge. Are they even part of our country? 😂
That would likely boost the economy of Australia and make it a world technological hub
they wont do it, they wont even in invest in bullet trains as they would need to lay new tracks,
The costs of labour and civil works in Australia are major barriers. However, we do know that the cost of construction would be much lower than for the proposed Brisbane-Melbourne conventional high-speed rail.
An LA to Vegas hyperloop seems like a pretty good option. I personally live in Vegas and have family in LA, so I wouldnt mind the 4-5 hour car ride being cut down at all.
Train
Delhi, Mumbai & Kolkata. 5:34 🇮🇳
Hey, shut up, the country is still bad at the core. The sugarcoating won’t help a rotten centre. The countries focus should be on the people, education and housing not these layered improvements.
@@rbanerjee605 oh we are focusing on everything and give us sometime just 4 years ago we got independence
Praful chandravanshi please get your facts right.
@@rbanerjee605 trust m only 4 years ago we got independence
Praful chandravanshi and finally, you are trying to say that India gained independence in 1947 whilst Singapore gained independence in 1965 and Hong Kong in 1999. These countries seem to have fared much better. Therefore, it is important that we look towards such countries and develop and strengthen the core of the system in education and sanitation and banking before trying to develop the topmost layer.
Living in Montevideo it was a pleasant surprise to see the Mercosur loop included! Maybe it could also be a closed loop, since there are many large cities along Brazil’s coast south of Sao Paulo, and it could also connect the popular Uruguayan resort of Punta del Este (a prime destination for Argentines, Uruguayans and Brazilians alike). Great video!
Sure sure lol
I'm argentinian and I'd rather have a proper railway infrastructure and a bigger metro system in Buenos Aires first. Freight and passenger railroads are incredibly underdeveloped thanks to political decisions in the 90s to abandon existing routes which left behind innumerable ghost towns in favor of a container trucks mafia.
I think a coastal railroad Montevideo-Sao Paulo would be amazing for both countries. It could pass through big cities like Porto Alegre, Florianopolis and Curitiba too. It could even be extended north to Rio de Janeiro, Salvador, Recife and Fortaleza and South to Buenos Aires all the way to Santiago del Chile. Its such a good idea that we could see it become a reality in our lifetimes, country neighbor.
I Think there shoud be an idea to conect Central Europe.
There shoud be 2 Main Routes:
L1: (Bordeaux - )Paris - Luxembourg - Frankfurt - Stuttgart - Munich - Vienna - Budapest (-Buckarest)
L2: London - Paris - Brussels - Cologne - Berlin - Warsaw (- Minsk - Moskau)
And one Connectionline:
Copenhagen - Hamburg - Cologne - Frankfurt - Strassbourg - Geneva - Turin - Milano - Florenz - Rome - Naples
So You can get from east to West and from north to south very quickly without Passing Alps or Pyrenees at a long distance
Canada has got to be one of the most disconnected countries in the world. Specially from East to West. We need a Hyperloop system ASAP
David Lopez Yes, we like it that way. Keeps all the mindless tourists out.
I mean Canada has a tiny population, so really, it doesn't need Hyperloop ASAP. I am not saying that Canada doesn't deserve it, I just don't see it making much sense in terms of logistics.
@@monkeymirror lol 😂😂😂
Invest on a train that is so much better.
This is great. Next step is installing some sidewalks in the city so you can get around!
nah that would only help poor people who don't have a security detail.
3 and a half years later and all of this is still a pipe dream.
The argument for most of these routes is about cheaper housing. But then first of all you will be connecting city centers which won't be cheap anyway, and second, as soon as the loop's being built housing price will skyrocket making the local population unable to afford it.
Yeh. Just buy real estate right before it explodes in price. Ezpz
You act like that isn’t happening currently without any loop.
Seattle to LA.
3 major port towns along the west coast. Interstate 5 currently is the limiting factor to the growth of the entire region. Large dams to provide cheap energy and a old and failing rail infrastructure to replace.
Might as well throw Vancouver in too!
Maglev trains are currently proposed between Vancouver and Portland, but the hyperloop had been dismissed as an option so far. No one wants to be first!
i dont think anyone wants that area to grow..its already too expensive
Dam Xam Seattle, Portland, Eugene, San Francisco, San Jose, San Luis Obispo, Los Angeles, and finally San Diego
Gerrad Reynolds with that infrastructure it would allow for expansion away from the dense and very expensive areas. Though the best solution is to start building larger affordable housing areas
I don’t think people realise how expensive the tickets would be, especially at the start.
I would expect that most airline tickets would be cheaper in order to compete with the Hyperloop system costs.
This channel is so badass honestly
Haha - thanks!! 👍👍
Yep. Love watching these videos...
interesting definition of badass...
We don't know But India Introduce Semi Hi- speed Train... "Train-18 and train-20.
And we are so happy about it...
And Bullet train will be fully operational in India by 2022 and also I am happy 😁
@@Hoe-numan5 it'll be functional by December
For Mumbai- Pune route mou is signed by Maharashtra government and virgin company. So Mumbai- Pune is first route in India may be soon operational.
O...onee chan ? :3
Seeing that Musk admitted to proposing hyperloop to slow growth of high speed rail, this hasn't aged all too well
Very good video! Hamburg-Berlin-Munich. Maybe Stockholm-Gothenburg-Malmö-Copenhagen
Sweden may build it, but Denmark won't. But then the Swedes would build a rocket to land men on the surface of the sun...
Koppa Dasao what do you mean? Rocket to sun???
Acke7 A rocket to land men on the surface of the sun. As I said. Are you Swedish or something?
Koppa Dasao Yes I’m Swedish. But what has a rocket to the sun with hyperloop to do?
Acke7 Vel, siden du er en svenske så må jeg vel forklare det for deg… Sola har ingen overflate og Hyperloop er en helvetesmaskin
Cairo-Khartoum- Addis Ababa-Nairobi- Dodoma-Lusaka- Harare-Joburg- Capetown.
This route would connect hundreds of millions of people.
hundreds of millions of people who can't afford the ticket price...
Maybe when Africa starts to develop more however Joburg to Cape town is possible
Africa needs to find its on way ... to solve basic problem of infrastructure.
The Quebec-Montreal-Ottawa-Toronto-London-Detroit route should have been included. It has so many more connection possibilities, West to Chicago, south to Atlanta. The B1M always seems to have a bias against Canada.
For sure it would have been better than putting the British hyperloop or the Euroloop, 2 useless (and irrelevant for the rest of the world in Britain's case) things
@Nathaniel Tesfaye lol, he was speaking about London in Ontario. I've never understood why so many places in the Americas are called like the originals in Europe. Be creative guys
The Texas Triangle is my area. How can I participate in this development?
It does not exist yet it is just speculation
Texas would be a beast if it had this. Competing with Cali
Pray.
The proposals shown on this video are just ideas of this channel, so there's nothing about it yet.
Realistically, start by getting the Texan politicians to watch this video and then explain how it could boost the states economy ( i. e. Beaucoup Bucks...$$$..and essentially the hyperloop would pay for itself ). Also explain, whoever ( i.e. The politician that gets this started and seen to the end could basically write his own ticket into the white house. )
Wow. Next generation will be so happy...
its coming to you on tw0 or 3 years not thing so far abot next genration. its new mode of transport for this genration future will be so far
get ready to travel
Kishore Mergu. I hope you are doing well right now. When you say: Wow. The Next Generation will be so Happy.. Are you saying that because the idea of Hyperloop looks great for our future? If you are, I want like for you to read my post I left on this site. After you read my post are you still happy for our next Generation? I want a better America as much as you do Kishore. I think we need to realize that it is one thing to invent great idea's about being a more freedom based Society, As long as we look at how our Government has handled this great idea's through generation's of the past to present. Let's look at some history Kishore. In America between 1920 and 1939, Depending on the on the area. It took about 23 years to fully replace the cheap buggy, Starting from the Model T was made in volume in 1916, To the end of the Great Depression in 1939. So. Looking at history, The making of a Model T back in 1916 was a very happy time right? But, In 2019 as I type this 103 years later, We are trying to replace the so called great day man invented the Model T?? So Kishore. Could you please help me out right now? Because I really need some help right now. Are we smarter now then we were in 1916? And if we in fact are smarter, Just how did we become more intelligent? I can't wait to hear your answer. Larry. Can we answer your question? Is anyone welcome to answer? Absolutely! I want all humans to teach me me about how man is getting smarter as we go forward. Remember. At the time we were making the Model T in 1916 which was a great idea at the time, Apparently looking back, Man was dumb because now we are smarter. Seriously?
@@greattunesking1 in simple language brother??
@@greattunesking1 You are a brainlet
A great hyperloop possibility for Canada that definitely should be discussed is from Halifax, Nova Scotia on the Atlantic Coast all the way over to Vancouver, British Columbia in the Pacific Northwest. This route would make a fantastic candidate for a hyperloop because of the vast distances between all of Canada's major cities and the fact that they are all basically in a straight route along the southern portion of the country. You can go all the way from Halifax, Nova Scotia to Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island to Moncton, New Brunswick to Québec City, Québec to Montreal, Québec to Ottawa, Ontario to Toronto, Ontario to Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario to Winnipeg, Manitoba to Regina, Saskatchewan to Calgary, Alberta and finally to Vancouver, British Columbia. 🚄💨🚇🛤️🔁👍🏻🙂
That would be a hyper expensive route to build
@@nachcam yeah, it would probably make more sense to start by linking our major cities using tried and tested high speed rail, which we still have none of currently lol
@@eclogite seriously, if we are going to keep expanding our numbers through immigration, at least give us something out of it like high speed rail across the country.
@@ProgressiveConservative why is that related to immigration? We've been in sore need of improved rail service for decades regardless
Yeah that way all twelve people in Canada get around.
Maybe a Scandinavian route? Aalborg-Aarhus-Copenhagen-Malmø-Stockholm-Oslo-Bergen
Take Hamburg Into it.. so you get a route from Central Europe to Skandinavia!
too few people live there
You Missed Mexico´s project connecting Mexico City Queretaro León and Guadalajara..!
Thunderf00t has a series of videos debunking Hyperloop and concluded Hyperloop is a pipe dream.
Take it straight from an engineer that hyperloop is not viable. Just think one bullet hole and it collapses. Technically it is feasible but the cost will be prohibitive. Bullet trains are much cheaper and work. Hyperloop was derived from hyperbole.
A decent level of capacity at the proposed speeds and pod sizes would be impossible to achieve, and the energy and time required to maintain a perfect vacuum would outweigh any benefits over high-speed rail. It's nonsensical.
7:52 why are you mentioning Düsseldorf and Cologne, but don't show them as part of the route? Makes no sense! The entire Rhine-Ruhr metropolitan area got 10 million inhabitants, Germanys largest metro area
The Rhine-Ruhr loop connected with the harbours of Antwerp and Rotterdam would more likely be build as a cargo line not one for people. for companies there is way more money in that.
As a Texan who lives in the Dallas/Fort Worth area, I can agree with this 100 percent. We need a better way to connect our major cities in the "Texas Triangle" than interstates 10, 35, and 45. A hyperloop would help eliminate the need to drive for HOURS between the cities.
Hyperloop is just a worse version of high speed rail. It doesn't matter if hyperloop is faster than high speed rail because the hyperloop is an individual pod, while high speed train is a high capacity train, so high speed rail will move more people way faster and more efficiently.
I cant wait for the Sacramento to San Diego Hyper Loop! I live in the SF Bay Area and I always travel down to LA and San Diego, so I feel like the California Hyper Loop will help me travel the state even better and faster.
It's a cool idea, but not much progress is being made with the hyperloop.
Think you better get use to waiting, this most likely won't happen in our lifetime
3:48 These guys make great vids but did this guy just pronounce Kyoto as freaking KAYOTO ???
Kevin Surjanto and don’t forget about the other important cities such as Nagowa and Kobee
I need a hyperloop to my pizza store, and that's everything
There’s no need to make one in japan
Japan is making a maglev bullet train between the pat route set to take passengers on 2027
Been a fan of this channel for a while kinda cool to see my city Fresno on it! Made my day🤗👍
3:48 I had a fucking stroke when I heard how he pronounced the city of Kyoto...
Cai Odo
Nagoya… I heard nagowa? And Changsha …changsaw?
I did die for 2 secs.
@@araquejo welcome back to the land of the living
The length required for the Hyperloop to accelerate and decelerate is not in consideration in this video. Linking those close cities would be both technically and economically impractical. But it's still a great video!
What cities are too close?
Those cities arr being proposed for hyperloop construction because They are too far...goddamit...just study how easily an object in vacuum space can be stopled
Hyperloops is known for its speed. But how about the capacity of the pods and trains? In this video you are talking about connecting tens of millions at once and commuting, this would mean that huge capacities are needed at once in rush hour. In Europe they have introduced double dekker trains and even double dekker TGV's.
And saving time compare to airport's security and checkins: will this not be needed for such transport method?
This! - How many seats are in each 'pod' - how long is a pod, will be be multiple pods running a train like system? Every damn video shows only 1 pod and I'm like... how is this efficient? A train will hold more.
CrazyInWeston with virtually zero friction trains could be as long as required.
The supposed advantages of hyperloops are entirely mythical. You mention just a couple of examples. Demand for travel peaks at certain times of the day and capacity and security are certainly some of hyperloop's many flaws. Elon Musk suggests some barking mad ideas at times ! Making rocket fuel on Mars is another example.
@@pasoundman Thank you for your input on these issues. Elon has red your comment and will stop all operations immediately. Thanks! you saved him billions of dollars because of course, knowing so much more than he and his company does he just realized that he is indeed mad and listened to reason! Oh and also i'm pretty sure you would've been part of the people trying to stop the wright brothers trying to fly, because heh, they're barking mad and the plane has many flaws.....
STFU man
@@CrystalStearOfTheCas I think Elon Musk is more concerned about problems at Tesla and the Gigafactory actually.
Thanks for the shout out, and personally I think it would be great for Australia, but I just don't think we are very good at planning ahead. I live in Brisbane, and we been debating a flood control dam here since 74. 46 years on and 2 more floods later, we are where we started.
But the loop would be great to have one from Sydney to Perth as well across the nallbour
@@Msoy1999 No, that would be a fucking garbage idea. It would cost an insane amount of money to set up when the human demand for travel between those two points in relatively tiny.
Linking Perth and Sydney would be great. A west coast afl grand final could be on the cards..
Wait what about the heat from being exposed to the sun for thousands of kilometers causing the pipe to buckle then implode due to the vacuum seal failing and everybody dying instantly from the crash.
Sounds nasty
@@markcostello5120 The tube is built with expansion joints. This would appear to be being taken into account, hence prototypes being built in desert areas.
The Quebec City-Windsor Corridor (French: Corridor Québec-Windsor) is the most densely populated and heavily industrialized region of Canada. As its name suggests, the region extends between Quebec City in the northeast and Windsor, Ontario in the southwest, spanning 1,150 kilometres (710 mi). With more than 18 million people, it contains about half of the country's population,
Maybe, but we should rename the 👑windsor corridor to their original name sax-coburg to recognize all the 👶🏻traffiking 🌭🧀🍕🔪🩸💉🐼🧠👼🏻☠️that has gone on👀🤔🧐
Hyperloop is just a worse version of high speed rail. It doesn't matter if hyperloop is faster than high speed rail because the hyperloop is an individual pod, while high speed train is a high capacity train, so high speed rail will move more people way faster and more efficiently.
I would love to connect lahore and karachi to UAE and new York, and big European cities , start from Karachi and cover all cities of Pakistan and villages of Pakistan
I live in Baltimore, and Virgin Hyperloop One already started to build infrastructure here connecting to DC.
Yeah, I know..., in the air...
@@koppadasao If I wasn't specific enough, my bad. I meant tunnels.
Interpol Yeah…, tunnels in the air, where the air is really thin
Interpol I live in the Baltimore area too. I really do wish we had a high speed line besides Amtrak connecting the 5 cities. Why drive for an hour to DC when you can just hop on the hyperloop and get to Union station in 20 minutes
I would extend the Boston-DC all the way to Savannah through Atlanta, Charleston, the Research Triangle, Norfolk and Richmond, the California loop to Vancouver through Seattle, Portland and Eugene, also possibly south down the Baja.
And a midwest loop of Chicago, Milwaukee, Madison, Minneapolis, Des Moines, Omaha, Kansas City, St Louis, Memphis, Nashville, Lexington, Cincinnati, Columbus, Cleveland, Toledo, Detroit, Lancing, Grand Rapids, Gary, Chicago witb perhaps 2 sub loops Cincinnati, Indianapolis, Gary and St Louis, Springfield, Bloomington, Joliet, Chicago would provide good places to connect the other 3 American loops (KC, Tulsa, Oklahoma City, Dallas) (Cleveland, Erie, Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, Buffalo, NYC) (Omaha, Denver, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas, Phoenix, LA) recreating much of the original transcontinental rail system
I actually don’t understand how you don’t have more subscribers
Because his videos are crap
@@koppadasao lmao stfu
I think instead of the EU loop you propose here splitting the EU up into 3 or 4 lines would make more sense. Here are some ideas for lines I had:
Route 1 (western North-South line):
Warsaw - Berlin - Rotterdam/The Hague - Antwerp - Brussels - Paris - Bordeaux - Bilbao - Madrid - Lisbon
Route 2 (West-East line):
Manchester - London - Paris - Zurich - Innsbruck - Vienna - Budapest
Route 3 (eastern North-South line):
Copenhagen - Hamburg - Berlin - Prague - Vienna - Zagreb - Sarajevo - Tirana - Athens
Route 4 (Baltic-Italian line):
Helsinki - Tallinn - Riga - Vilnius - Warsaw - Vienna - Venice - Rome
Hubs of these lines would become: Paris, Berlin, Warsaw and Vienna
I know most of these lines are likely geopolitically not feasible but it was a fun idea :)
San Antonio baby!!!! A Texas Triangle loop makes so much sense and would turn the state into a world economic powerhouse.
I think the golden triangle in india is a perfect route for hyperloop.I think there is a hyperloop project in india.Its from Mumbai to Pune.But still l love B1M
Mumbai,Bengaluru,Hyderabad,Chennai will be more feasible route
This video didn’t age well. Hyperloop is still a pipe dream.
B1M 4 life! its just sooo interesting
Wow! Thank you so much for your great feedback! We love our viewers!!
Eugene, OR - Portland, OR, - Seattle, WA - Vancouver, BC would be great for the NW coast
"Cascadia" !!
link that to California and BAM.
Yes, I think that planes between Portland and Seattle are every 30 minutes.
Could potentially link with California’s hyperloop and turn the west coast into a single massive economy with two distinct & heavily cooperative megalopolises
During the time of President McKinley, there was a plan to build an extension across the Bering Straits to link with the transiberian and then go from Anchorage to someplace in Chile. The British would have lost a lot of shipping contracts to the railroads
Interesting how we haven't heard anything since
For INDIA: Delhi -> Jaipur -> Mumbai -> Pune -> Bangalore -> Chennai; Would be the optimal route and if needed can include Udaipur, Ahmedabad, Hubli.
@youtubeboy are Dholera and gift real?
Québec city, splitting in Montréal to reach the Boston - DC loop, and west as the transcanadian loop (first known as the Québec city - Toronto loop).
India is the first country to have hyperloop in the world 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Connect the Midwest. Minneapolis-Milwaukee-Chicago-Indianapolis
In India, the plan is for diamond quadrilateral based on Golden quadrilateral. Never heard any plans to directly connect Mumbai with Kolkata. Because there are no big/ developed cities between them.
The plan is to provide HSR between Mumbai Delhi Kolkata Chennai Bangalore to Mumbai. Indian Govt will work on other projects only after these routes are completed. Other routes only possible if State govt wants to construct then on their own.
Yes, they are giving wrong information of Hyperloop Project in India and also the picture shown over here 5:44 is not from India, its from Brazil.
At this point the hyperloop looks more and more like a hype train that's about to crash down big time like the severely underwhelming Vegas Loop.
This is brilliant, well thought out and well researched informative video👌🏾 keep it up. Very objective too...
I would love to see all of the US connected thru hyperloop
'Catchment'? That's a new one. Not for storm drains anymore. 'Catch those passengers!'
Mexico City - Querétaro - León - Guadalajara
Esa ruta es ideal. Poríamos agregar en un extremo a Puerto Vallarta y Nayarit y en el otro Puebla y el puerto de Veracruz para que quede una ruta del Golfo al Pacífico.
Esa ruta está planeada, también de la CDMX a Nuevo Laredo y probablemente conectando con el hiperloop en San Antonio, Texas.