2016 Subcompact Crossover Shootout
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
- It's a big year in the land of baby crossovers and we have gathered the seven key players for a 2016 Subcompact Crossover Shootout. Full story: www.autoguide.com/car-comparis...
Subscribe
th-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
TH-cam - / autoguidevideo
Facebook - / autoguide
Twitter - / autoguide
Google+ - goo.gl/LBxsP
Web - www.AutoGuide.com
AutoGuide reviews the latest new cars with test drives, car comparisons and shootouts plus coverage of breaking auto industry news, auto shows, rumors and spy photos. Help shop for your new car with informative car buying tips and car recall news, and be entertained with feature stories, Top 10s and car review videos. - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
![[Watch Party] APL 2024 บุรีรัมย์ทั้งใจ Go Go](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cKwcPFsawN4/mqdefault.jpg)
Style wise, NO other vehicle here is even on the same planet as the CX-3. INCREDIBLY beautiful!
over under sideways down Beam me up Scotty
I disagree with his assessment of the Jeep Renegade. Like he said at the end of the video, " it comes down to personal priorities" -- in which his "priorities" are about boredom! For me? My priorities were based on specific needs. 1- 4x4 capabilities for Northern Michigan winters. 2- sub compact SUV (not a car) 3- daily winter commuter. 4- better gas mileage than my Jeep JK. The Renegade met all this and more. The ride quality is far better than nearly all reviews I have read, and the winter package was a huge bonus! Heated seats, steering wheel, rain sensor wipers, heated mirrors, and remote start. After working a 12 hour shift while it was snowing all day accumulating 12" of snow-- would you rather have the Honda sitting in the parking lot waiting to get you home or the Jeep? I also got this for far less than his outlandish quote of 33k? Add $2 k to my price and I now have lifetime bumper to bumper warranty. For those on the edge of a decision, I would suggest a test drive to see for yourself that many of their findings won't match yours!
Thanks for sharing! These reviews never seem to touch on how the vehicles perform in winter (some of us have to drive to work/home through lake effect snow)
Great point. I watched dozens of Renegade videos on TH-cam and I have grown tired of reviewers talking about "not fun". I don't buy Jeeps as toys. I need to get thru 10" of Minneapolis snow and potholed streets in the spring.
Agreed! And even for me, a city-living -lovingthe -outdoorstrips person...renegade just is the only option!
Personality etc and also the price. Not sure how it goes worldwide, but I just couldn't find any other brand giving me a decent price for these cars, even not during the autosalon, which gives extra's for free etc...Nope Jeep Renegade just did it for me!
Only drawback...have to wait until 16th of april :P
The Jeep is great looking, it really rocks!
Man... if the CX-3 had more rear seat room, more cargo area, and magic seats similar to of a Honda's, it would've won every single subcompact SUV comparison.
+Michael Lee Yea right! And if my grandmother had balls she would be my grandfather.
+Michael Lee That's why it didn't... win every single comparison. If it had all the above mentioned features, it'll be bulbous
+Occams Razor HAHAHAHAHAHA
+Michael Lee too bad it doesn't have anything, yeah, if it was good, it could have won, i agree.
If that's what you are looking then the cx-5 is perfect for you. everything you just said is there.
Hey I'm from the future and theres something called the Hyundai Kona lol
Also Kia Sportage, Toyota C-HR, etc
No one can beat a Honda. Honda gives you the best bang for the buck.
+zorkor I disagree. Hondas bore me.
+buildmorefarms100 They may be boring, but they're so damn practical! I test drove the Mazda CX-3, Subaru Crosstrek & the Chevy Trax. The CX-3 was more fun to drive then the lot, but the seats are too damn narrow & there is no cargo room @ all. I purchased the HR-V EX-L w/ Navi & I really like it overall. Yeah...The engine is semi-gutless but once you get it on the highway, it's fine. Great fuel consumption & I love the interior (again...some might find it boring) All-in-all it's works for me. I do love the styling of the Fiat, just that it's terrible reliability record it has.
the honda sucked no head room least horse power 141 hp to 127 lb-ft thas b.s at least the others were closer honda suck
zorkor until Toyota steps in.
Still running my 2016 Renegade Trailhawk in the Pacific Northwest. We're loving this Jeep in this winter storm. Great rig for all weather conditions and terrain.
At LEAST 170 inches in length ... or less? That makes no sense. Where is the nerdy white guy and the hot Asian girl?!
+Sleepy Panda Exactly. We need the hot asian girls
+Sleepy Panda I agree. The U.S. EPA defines subcompact as no more than 165 inches in length, so technically, the Outlander sport at 169 inches shouldn't be included.
I test drove almost all of these and bought the CX-3. The HR-V was weak with the old 1.8 Civic engine and the CVT transmission just makes it even weaker. CX-3 AWD Touring with premium package is a $25K car worth every penny.
honda is really on fire this year with Civic, Pilot, and HR-V!
+Dennis Adrian All boring cars.
Dennis Adrian the pilot is the ugliest SUV in its class.... its boring to even look at.
i love the cx3
Just got CX3 yesterday after a lot of thinking and research. Overall it is a great option if you want a crossover with good fuel economy. Yes There are some cons but keeping in mind the price and the fuel economy, it's definitely a 'Go for it' option.
Anshul Dhawaria we saw the cx3 at the SF auto show and I laughed when I opened the trunk.
ERON yes bro, the trunk space sux, don't know what they were thinking
Anshul Dhawaria I know huh. Might as well save money and get more space in the regular hatchback. is it the Mazda 3 ?
I am about to buy the new Mazda CX 3 2017
Any suggestions
in philippines its expensive crossing the base model mux
Why are they testing the trail hawk on road?
where is the qashqai?
got a Fiat trecking plus , leather head rest. they tested the lounge , if you gonna test then show top of the line. All leather seats , super great car fuel economy might say ehhh
As a 2014 Forester XT owner I can say all of these crossovers look very nice in my rear view mirror as I blow by them.
what about the new vitara?
Nice review
Juke is the best if you are one of the few who likes the looks like me.
Jimmy Peña juke is so ugly for me
I love my Juke. It's fast and capable.
out of all the crossovers, juke looks like the youngest sibling LOL
@@milosss1989 for city drive, it's better than jeep for me LOL. jeep renegade is slow and the transmission is unreliable. it's not consistent. based on my experience lol
Ask any car lover what their least favourite car on the planet is and the most common answer would be a Nissan Juke
how about some offroad test?
Time for the Juke to get refreshed.
Can't wait for the next gen model in a couple of years which should correct and addressed all of the knocks against it.
And how about the new Suzuki Vitara. I like the way it looks. Has anybody driven it?
number one cx3
At lease 170 inches in length or less???
HR-V Is fun to drive! Its offered as a manual too!
Price and quality
MX-3!!!!!!! Mazda design is goooooood!!!!!!!
+HERI HAO I'll admit it looks pretty good. I'm not a fan of the Juke for sure - probably prefer HR-V out of all of these.
It just blows my mind how Mitsubishi didn't offer Outlander Sport with 2.0T with dual clutch... I have it for 5 years now, in diesel version with 150hp, and the only thing i have changed for 100k miles are the brake pads (twice)! It really is a great vehicle, with some minor stupid things, like low quality plastics and paint.
Honda is getting all the love from autoguide. Lol Congrats Honda
How does the Crosstrek not fit in this competition?
Thank you, Sir. 😊🚘
where's the Mini Countryman...was in the subcompact game before most of these others?
Why no Subaru XV???
No rav 4?
FCA should hire Honda engineers.
Great review.
I Go for the JUKE...1.6 CVT TURBO CHARGE..is the most powerful engine nd segment compact crossover,..unique and stylish design, whch r not common in d street...
I would have to agree with the review after I've tested one myself, the Honda HRV seems to fit as the best compact SUV just lacking a little power (though there is something charming about the Kia Soul and Jeep Renegade). As I'm shopping for one next year, I'd really like Honda to put in the new turbo motor they have in the Civic (without the CVT!) into the HRV to give it a little motor umph...
I HAVE HAD IT WITH ALL THOSE SHINY CLONES! ..IT'S TIME FOR A CHANGE.. THINK I'LL TAKE THE TALL ONE!
renegade is the best.. it does have a awsome handling.. even than the wrangler. coz i have both
The Wranglers handling is known for being absolutely terrible, so thats not saying much. The infamous "Jeep wobble".
what about the Tiguan
9th gear in both Renegade and 500X wasn't designed for slow US highways. It engages around 80 which is a common highway speed limit in many parts of the world.
jukes engine in the cx3 would rule
or the Crosstrek...
put the turbo 4cyl engine that was used in the Acura RDX into the HRV and you'd have an awesome vehicle
Wait a subcompact crossover is at least 170 inches or less (0:23)? So they have to be exactly 170 inches?
the mini is that so idk
If the Honda HRV had the styling of the Outlander Sport, 500x or the CX-3, it would have been perfect.
If the trax looked better tho
I have Jeep patriot 2016 should I get the jeep renegade 2017 or should istick to my patriot?
Mike Molcule I just traded my 2015 Patriot and bought a Renegade. I have only had it for a few days but I love it. Also my insurance went down $170 because the Renegades safety scores are higher.
Stinko 407 thank you, I really love the looks of it
You missed the Mini Cooper countryman that's a subcompact crosser?. I'm sorry a fiat 500x that's the same size as a Mini Cooper countryman?
So you added at a juke but no Subaru crosstrek which is the top selling crossover...
Where is the XV Crosstrek?
+Sunny Fung It was a little bit too big to be included if this test.
+AutoGuide.com. So The Crosstrek is to Big to be a Sub compact crossover and too small to be in the compact segment. Yet most people think it's Just the right size. Come on car journalist. Let's get the Crosstrek out of limbo. Despite it's category. It will always make the short list.
+Sunny Fung It would've won easily.
+unnervingfalcon Useless vehicle. Purchase an Impreza hatch or just go to an Outback.
In my opinion any small cuv's are useless but I was just saying in this segment the Crosstrek would've won easily.
nice test report.
but why you never test the off road or awd ability like diagonal test.
your not testing hatch backs! there is some cross over.
I think you forgot most important campare part
Nissan Rogue??
Trailhawk will get you out of snow, sleet and mud....all the rest if for play...
With discounts the mitsubishi can be had for far less than all the rest and at that point is the winner to me.
The Kia Niro could have been a competitor now too if this test would have been done this year
Leave out the Crosstrek?
I was convinced a year ago that I would be replacing my Pontiac Vibe with a CX-3 the first time I saw one...until I saw where the front cup holders are located. What a shame!
HR-V for my needs.
500x is good car and really rocks!
The best is the buick encore!!!
You hate on Nissan Juke but drive the nismo rs and its so badass
Yeah. The RS is a riot to drive.
The gears are being used properly in the Renegade. They have been tuned to European standards, and trust me, because we all drive manuals, we know what a good transmission is.
THE ENVIRONMENT IS SO GOOD
i like the renegade desert hawk more if they only turbo charged that 2.4 l tiger shark motor like the srt4 like the caliber or older neon it would be a beast
My son owned 2 srt 4 neon and they are by far the badest small street car I have ever been in .
2:30 MY EYES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did you know that nissan juke had a nismo variant
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 2.4
like the cx3 looks... but that jeep rocks
No Crosstrek? Why not? Because AWD is not an option, but rather standard equipment?
Bmw x1? Audi q3? Merc GLA or GLC?
I mean this is a year old but it's compact not luxury compact
Those are luxury sub-compact category.
Not sure I understand the practicality of the HR-V when you can get the bigger CR-V with an engine that can deal with the Honda CVT. I guess maybe in the base level trim for price. Too bad the AWD isn't offered with a the manual. I enjoy driving, so the CX-3 was a no brainer for me, with a six speed automatic. If I need practicality I'd have gone with a bigger crossover like the CX-5/HR-V/RAV-4.
and second place? and third?
2nd TOYOTA AND SUBARU
3rd Trax
You're missing the Subaru crosstrek!!
HRV has a motorcycle engine and you said not to carry 4 adults and it wins?!?
Reverand Mac , for him only.
sponsored by honda
What a pity none of them have hotrod versions with manual transmissions and powerful engines.
+scanspeak00 if you buy the cheapest models they come with manual transmission.
I'm a fan of Honda, and somehow I just don't like the HRV.
me 2
It looks boring. The renegade is the most stylish for me. Love the retro/modern look
Hope they update it fast. I really don't like the look. it doesn't evoke any emotions other than meh.
that color on this HRV is horrendous. Looks great in white and the LED headlights (in European/Asian markets) look good.
They had to get one car slightly... wrong for lack of a better word. The CRV is miles better than the HRV. So if you have had a chance with the CRV, yo probably will not like the HRV
If the Juke was like a smaller Rogue, perhaps the size of the HRV inside, it would be a better contender.
Renegade is the best to me
Sheldon Gardner least reliable
jeep is under 20k on sale
Only one comes with a manual and has AWD, and so only one matters to me. I wish more of them would offer that.
I can hardly wait for you guys to comparison test 2017 Ridgeline with it's true competition and true lifestyle check, instead of 1-2 guys jumping in a vehicle and state opinion.
no vitara?
+Bram AP 90 I don't think it's being sold in the USA anymore. (Might be wrong though).
If they offered a manual transmission, I'd buy a Juke. I love the way the freaky thing looks. Hell, even if it came with a traditional automatic, I'd consider it. Not having any option but the CVT = no freaking way.
Based on the vehicles' front fascia:
Modern = CX3
Quirky = Juke & 500X
Masculine = Outlander Sport
Rugged = Renegade
Conservative = Trax
Feminine = HRV
Tax Is T REX BABAY
I MENT TRAX BLODY AUTO REKT
The renagade is meant for off-road
I don't get this segment. Why would you want a subcompact SUV? Its basically just a taller hatchback car is most cases with worse fuel economy. The HRV is just a taller Fit, why not just get the Fit? I think its more attractive anyway and you get 41 MPG hwy. The only car I would consider in this segment is the Renegade, however it is overpriced IMO.
Whitney B when you getting older, crawl in and climbing out is no fun! Hrv gives that option of just slide your butt in and out. ☺ BTW I own both of them, so I know the feeling.
The outlander sport is a compact suv not a subcompact
There is something definitely going on in the car industry. In the US the Chevy Encore does around 25 to the gallon, whereas it's UK equivalent the Vauxhall Mokka (they are fundamentally the same car), does between 42 and 64 mpg. Then there's the Jeep Renegade. In the US it averages around 23 mpg whereas in the UK again, it does more like 32-55 city, 48-71 highway. That is a considerably variation. We may pay more for gasoline here but our cars a lot more efficient. How can two identical cars from the same manufacturer be so different, funny that isn't it.....??
The european versions are usually DIESEL....and diesel engines burn fuel slower....that is why they are noisy....We don't like noisy engines in the U.S so our cars are petrol engines....
EUROPE diesel...
U.S.A petrol....
It's more about the type of fuel different continents use....
"At least 170 inches or less." So....*exactly* 170 inches, then? Okay, pretty restrictive, but whatever floats your boat.
Outlander? Car shown is a RVR
+Ponyboy The RVR is known as the Outlander Sport in the USA
+Ponyboy, I guess you're Canadian eh? Coz its RVR in Canada. In Australia, its ASX, in the US its Outlander Sport.
aha yeaa
I know right this guy should know what he is doing
Was just searching it... Thanks
I've been investigating this segment for a while. And honestly it seems like every single vehicle is underpowered and crazy small. I wish the Mini Countryman was part of this comparison but I'd imagine the price would be the highest.
I might just skip this market segment and get a compact versus sub compact. It seems like you get more for your money. More power. More space. More features. I can't believe the cx3 and HRV don't have power seats. What a joke.
Where's Subaru?
Mazda should make a cx4
Missing Subaru XV,Volkswagen Tiguan,Audi Q3, BMW X1
The pricr of those are way more than these in the vid
Subaru Forester ?
Compact SUV. One size up.
no rav4?
+I HATE CROSSHIT moelikaboss Not the same class of vehicle.
Swindon town
Fiat 500X diesel all the way
Can't argue with the result but i'd still prefer the Mazda.
We got a new Subaru premium with all the things you speak, of, minus the map crap. 25k. About 2-4k below MSRP. The car that should be in this test is the Impreza Outback. Really has the same or better space than most of these cars and at least better ground clearance than the Chevy. It would likely win the test. If the Mitsu could be had for under 22 grand, I think it would be the best value.
chevy wins BUT I LOVE SUBARU ADS AWWWW DOGIIEEEEEE
Only the CH-R beats the juke
"at least 170 inches in length or less" anybody else take issue with this line?