There is certainty in uncertainty: Brian Schmidt at TEDxCanberra

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @nishanks93
    @nishanks93 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These talks aren't necessarily meant to teach concepts (in this case statistics), but to show the importance of something so simple. Many who know of advanced concepts tend to forget where it all came from.

  • @infomysteria5845
    @infomysteria5845 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Uncertainty is the real essence of worlds going on

  • @killdatguy41
    @killdatguy41 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    that kid seems like the smartest in the school, or close to. Do you know these guys in person?

  • @etienne7774
    @etienne7774 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In God's mind there is no uncertainty. Only in yours.
    Read the KJB!

  • @skiptaker
    @skiptaker 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    there is Certainty in uncertainty !!!

  • @maddrk3724
    @maddrk3724 12 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    pretty low level lecture, that can be taught in pre-school basically, but not worthy of ted or a Nobel laureate. It was basically a first lesson in probability/statistics, even the demos were not that good.

    • @pascalstraetmans5598
      @pascalstraetmans5598 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      look at the people, everyone is so confident about its own view .. I think it would be great if more people would understand what this man was trying to say

  • @bahadirozer
    @bahadirozer 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this doesnt help at all.

    • @ed4183
      @ed4183 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow, I now I understand what they meant, about knowledge is power. Keep on watching it over and over again, this is gold.

  • @xylos16
    @xylos16 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love Plinko! 😆

  • @killdatguy41
    @killdatguy41 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    okay

  • @sofiamajewski
    @sofiamajewski 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Me and my fellow Nobel Laureates" should have been "I and my fellow Nobel Laureates"
    Not that, as a Speaking Coach, I would ever criticise a Nobel Laureate.
    However, what I would always say is - when you speak in public it's a good idea to rehearse your opening and closing lines!

    • @patrickholmes9743
      @patrickholmes9743 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well said!! I immediately noticed the same. Very sad. And nobody is above criticism, we're all equally human! Btw, Nobel prizes are always very political (who wins, etc)!!! So it's not always a reflection of intelligence and talent, as we can see in this unimpressive talk.

    • @mindmatters7926
      @mindmatters7926 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually he should say what he likes the purpose of communication is to communicate and to be understood. If you wish to be pedantic then he may choose "My fellow Nobel and me". If he were the Queen of England he would say "My fellow Nobel Laureates and I" but "I and my Nobel Laureates" is grammatically incorrect. You always put the 'other' first in your speech as a mark of respect. Hence " My husband and I". This is the Queen's English which, is a dying art.
      On the whole I find that he articulates well.

  • @nix207
    @nix207 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    what you did there.. i see it. but maybe not.

  • @leematthew2424
    @leematthew2424 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    One second you’re talking about inability to measure chaotic systems,and the next you are saying you can measure and keep our emissions to under 2%,which is it? Ya can’t have it both ways!

    • @bibiayube677
      @bibiayube677 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      When did you get a PhD fucktardds