ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- M/S Estonia, previously Viking Sally (1980--1990), Silja Star (−1991), and Wasa King (−1993), was a cruise ferry built in 1979/80 at the German shipyard Meyer Werft in Papenburg.
The ship sank in 1994 in the Baltic Sea in one of the worst maritime disasters of the 20th century. It is the deadliest shipwreck disaster to have occurred in the Baltic Sea in peacetime, costing 852 lives.
Worst failure was the they could not see the bow visor from the bridge..
Yeah maybe that could have enabled them to ask for help earlier and saved lives.
TYHMÄÄ KUN ESTONIA UPPOS ,.... KANNATAAKS KUITENKI TSEKKAA ET KEULAVISIIRI O KUNNOL KII???????????????!
STOLEN!
This is original
@@idkwhatmyname7495 ur right
@@justinian536 the copy made 2009 while this made 2007
14 years old is nothing for a ship
We also have 25-30 years old cruiseferries in service here in Northern Europe. Nothing wrong with them
Nothing as we know of.
kert tamme lmao that is the baddest story, and there wasnt only ropes protecting the ship
All ferries that were involved in the Estonia rescue are still active today
@@Kert69 You could be right, but it could also be Israel or both.
Amorella is being replaced though
What a crap design. The ramp housing should be part of the ship's main structure, not the vulnerable visor. Visor and ramp should be completely seperate and independent from eachother in both function and position.
The car ramp, still seen on the bottom of the ocean, is still closed. Mostly closed, not at all wide open as shown in the simulation. Also car deck was above sea level. It could never have sunk within an hour like that. Something else must have happened, or a combination with something else.
staffan144 Bombs?
staffan144 #TrutherEdit
German expedition collected some metal from the ship, and few labaratories found explosion trays (such as "Twins"). So the reason why Estonia sunk may be explosion device onboard.
DolleHengst well the shipping industry accepted it
They diden’t know at that time there were some other ships that had the Same structure she was made to go 25 sea miles away from shoreline
I’m watching this before going on a ferry over the Baltic Sea actually...
I bet you found it highly boring if this was your expectation basis. I’m glad you made it safely. Roro is relatively unstable design, but the amount of good it does still seems worth it. Did you get seasick?
@@corettaha7855 what is unstable with it?
Good choice. Next time if you want to fly somewhere watch flight mh370 and now have nice day
No, dude's "memlord" and "Samuel."
That your DARE!!!!😮😢😢😢😢
It was a stupidly-designed ship. The bow should be the strongest part of the ship, not something that is only held together by a couple of flimsy hinges.
May God have mercy on their souls. May they rest in peace, all the victims, and may the families and loved ones they left behind be strong enough to deal with their tragic losses.
nordhorny No need for that.
Happier Gilmore amen 🙏🏻
That's horrible. RIP the victims.
"Rest In Peace"
Visor, you had one job...ONE JOB!
"The waves TRIED to move the visor"? Those sneaky waves, LOL!
Underestimation of the ocean's power!
The Baltic sea is no ocean
The lights in the car deck on any ro-ro ferry are never switched off. Especially since they have personnel down there.
Can't do much about lights if they got conplete blackout
Kui seal midagi tähtsat ei olnud siis miks, Estonia Agreement sõlmiti?
"In the end, the Estonia Agreement 1995, a treaty between Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Denmark, Russia and the United Kingdom (though the UK itself is not a Baltic state), declared sanctity over the site, prohibiting its citizens from even approaching the wreck"
Miks taheti M/S Estonia Betooniga katta?
Also for some reason dumb loads of sand to the ship, cover up something. There was even debate to concrete whole ship.
making ramp at the bow is such a rubbish idea.
It's for cars to go in
@@jumblewary4544 but it was pulled down by the bow visor
Should Have done it at the stern
R.M.S Titanic Liverpool it had a Door at the stern
Many ships have bow doors of this design
Even if the front visor and ramp broke, that doesn't explain why it sunk so fast. It should have capsized and remain afloat since the decks below the vehicle deck are watertight, even with all the upper decks filled with water. Does someone know?
Sven Ollino open surface fluid dynamics. Fill a glass with water and carry it across a room. If you are average clumsy, you probably make it without spilling any. Now pour 1/4 of the water from the glass into a sheet pan and carry that across the room at the same pace you did the glass. You’ll find it behaves very differently because it sloshes around, crashes against the sides, and makes the pan hard to keep stable even with both hands on it. The car deck is like the sheet pan, and the rest of the ship was top heavy above it, so it’s center of gravity shifted (ie, it capsized). Sorry it’s eleven years late, but there’s the answer
@@corettaha7855 thank you
@@corettaha7855 That's not really what he asked
The decks below the vehicle deck were NOT watertight! There were cabins down there and engineering spaces with tons of hatches and ventilation
Very good simulation! There was no submarine involved and no Bomb exploded. Only the water pressure damaged the front door.
25 years ago RIP
Desinformation. Ridiculous. The ramp is still closed to this day. And there are actually footage showing that. Also the engine crew could state that the camera filming the ramp showed it to be closed the whole time until the ship turned.. So this animation must be funded by carl bildts pocket...
Latches, hydraulic arms and other structures supporting the ramp were broken by the visor. So the ramp was moved quite loosely by water and gravity. The ship sunk upside down, you know. And there isn't any actual footage left from the camera on the car deck. In the statement the men at the engine room were saying that in the end there was so much water on the car deck that the picture started to blur.. So the ramp must have been quite much open for some time. It just bothers me that that people are either so stupid or mentally lazy that they cannot read and understand the report which has been public for twenty years. Then they rather believe these UFO, KGB, and CIA theories. Basic knowledge of natural sciences and engineering and ability of logical thinking is surprisingly rare nowadays which also explains popularity of these conspiracy theories.
@@tapiorissanen7652 Agreed! I'm still confused over how water came rushing down below car deck, since she didn't capsize and remained floating upside down. Shouldn't the doors on car deck be massive and sealed?
Ironically, the fact that she did take in water under car deck gave people time to evacuate..
@@tapiorissanen7652 Well, the official reports were a bit dodgy and changed multiple times. Especially at first, when asked "what's that all about", the governments just basically told everyone to fck off. And still does. Which is rude. So they basically made a medium for conspiracies and then acted all surprised about them. The sinking was a tragedy, but another one followed regarding the whole handling of the situation.
@@tapiorissanen7652 The official report was put together by the delegates of *Sweden*, *Estonia* and Finland. It wasn't a "neutral" commission, which could have, and most likely was orientated by the Swedish and Estonian goverments. It was a suspicion and a conspiracy theory a long time ago that Estonia and Sweden were smuggeling weapons on the ship, which was later confirmed, however at first denied by the goverments of Estonia and Sweden. When going by the Russian submarine theory, it would make sense that Estonia and Sweden manipulated the report and the commission to avoid anyone getting know of the illegal smuggeling. This theory is also supported by the completely unexplained covering of the ship with cement (possibly to cover the holes created by the submarines?).
The official report also completely ignores the laws of physics. How did the ship manage to sink from the stern and not even tilt any degree towards the bow? Maybe because (most) of the water didn't enter from the bow, but instead the starboard side of the ship? Also, if there wasn't any damage on the sides, how did the water enter the closed airpockets, which could have kept the ship floating upsidedown for hours if not days? For me the official report makes no sense at all.
I always thought it was a deliberate act..
Crappy boat. RIP to all who lost their life that day.
+BertilGyllenhake Night*
BertilGyllenhake crappy seas too. Boo mean waves 🌊 quit breaking things! Rip Estonia ferry victims. Blessings to their families.
What about the holes in the ship? And how could it sink so fast?
m.th-cam.com/video/dGydUgmFYY4/w-d-xo.html
Magnus Petersson u dont know anything mate
There was a bomb that blew out front, then huge waves opened the ramp and 100 TONNES water every second got inside!
Latvian Trainy Was there an audible explosion sound heard by survivors? If so, that might be plausible. Might.
vega albin probably right
1;50AM is when it finally fell. at night the waves are alot more aggressive than day time
Tuo uppoamisen syy on vielä kertomatta. Kalan syönnin lopetin tuon jälkeen, kun eihän tuolta alueelta pyydettyä kalaa uskalla syödä.
Ai miksi?
that is a tarrible way to sink ...
unexpected
First the official story about the weather is biased.
"Weather experts say that the allegation about a sixty foot wave was extremely unlikely, due to the fact that several other ships were in the area and they reported "6 foot [2 meter] waves in the area" with winds at 15mph"
All of a sudden M/S Estonia gets 10x higher waves. Give me a break.
Sven Ollino I’ve heard 20-25 ft waves. Rogue waves are scientifically verified now. Every now and then a wave geometrically forms that is freakishly higher than other waves in the same exact area. I just hadn’t heard this theory of the sinking.
when other cruiseferries with ramp at stern get into rogue waves their ramp doesn't fall off, but Estonia's ramp suddenly fell? like, the reason of sinking may be the bombs onboard, cuz there were found many holes.
@@jijimochin when a ship sinks generally some holes will be made by it impacting the seabed and also the pressure from the water.
Not sure where the reports of 15mph winds come from? Listen to the very moving radio recordings made over the the incident. Weather was quite severe even to the point of making a rescue very difficult. They could not even lower life boats to pick up survivors. They had to drop life rafts with cranes and rely on the survivors swimming to them. Helicopters were required to ferry people to the rescue vessels.
@@robinwells8879 Or of the survivor accounts. If you made it off the ship the next hurdle was not getting killed in the water. If you didn't have a vest by the time you hit the water, you were dead. If you had a vest but got swept away, you were dead. There's a reason only a little over 100 people made it.
MS Estonia is the best
Dennoch erklärt es nicht die Deformierungen und Aufspaltungen am Rumpf! Zeugenaussagen belegen, dass auch Wasser in die unteren Decks eindrang…!!
Im so lucky to be alive.. im scared to go on cruises since i saw this.. i was 3 years old when i cruised with estonia to sweden.. Thank you God for saving me and my family and not letting this tragedy happen when i was on that boat.. it sank some months or something later.. but its horrifying and im sad for all those lost lifes. this shouldnt happen but it just shows how fragile life and curises are! just a tiny wrong with techincal matter and this can happen in a few minutes.. its crazy.. and so scary. i dont know how ive been able to go on cruises ever since like 5-10 times.. i shouldnt have.. since its so dangarous! this happened even faster than titanic, they didnt even release any life-boats on estonia ? they barely got time. and just like titanic this happened just when everyone went to sleep = less likely they get out safely than if it would´ve been during the day.. awful :(
fake!!! !th-cam.com/video/gPx1bA4Y9XY/w-d-xo.html the ships was clearly bombed!!!
some ships are 100 years old like the Queen Mary which still sails every 5 years
The queen mary doesn't sail anywhere to the world since decades. The reason for that is that there are Parts of the Main engine Missing and because it is a steamship it would be quite uneconomic!!
Also she is surrounded by rocks and only a floating Hotel
QM is around 80 years old
To have an opening bow was not a good idea to begin with. You put the vehicle entrance at the stern and even if the ramps come off the ship it can still sail safely. If it hadn't happen that night it would have happened the night after that.
Placing moving parts at the front so that they're hit by every wave is what you do when you want the boat to fall apart.
Those poor people never stood a chance.
yep
The USN, Royal Navy, and dozens of ferry lines have operated hundreds of safely designed ships with bow doors for over 80 years. There is nothing inherently wrong with bow doors from an engineering perspective. Design and redundancy are critical.
@@KB4QAA The fact that a failure of a locking mechanism may result in the vessel sinking with everyone on board may not have anything wrong from an engineering perspective but it does have it from a philosophical perspective. You are supposed to design boats, planes, trains and everything else in such a way that even in the event of a failure you can still sail, fly and ride safely to your destination or to an alternative one without anyone getting wet, when the mechanism was conceived someone forgot to ask the most important question when there are human lives at stake: *what happens if it fails?*.
@@BeemerTwelve Thank you for admitting you were wrong!
@@BeemerTwelve I was built to fail safe the inner door did not fully open
It did not fale and did not sink Estonia
Poor poor people eyes popping out as they desperately try not to breathe in. Then lungs flooded with cold baltic sea water. Finally shting and pssing themselves with fear
The hinges were coroded
No they weren't
They detached by the stress
@@Terminatorfan1984REAL there was a bomb in one of the truck that got on board 15 minutes Late!
@@latviantrainy968 no there wasn't
@@latviantrainy968 the cause of the bow visor breaking off was due to waves slamming on the bow visor which caused stress on the hinges to soon break and the box visor fell off which caused the ramp to be pulled down
How did the visor survive 14 years of service? Was this the first time the ship experienced this type of weather?
Metal fatigue which is accelerated by cold conditions and the effects it has on the steels crystalline structure over periods of time. This along with constant straining and even possible corrosion induced fatigue. It had happened to one of her sister ship not long before the loss but checks are said not to have been made. Frequent panting maintenance can hide cracking from inspection teams. Sadly, it is all very plausible.
She had only being cross baltic for two years. Before that she was going in much more protected waters between Åland and Finland. According to one report I read she had only seen sea this hard for 20 hours before that terrible night.
Estonia's sister also experienced this during a storm.
Yes they were. Mariella was there before the helics. By the way, ManenQ, are you one of the JAIC to say that THIS is true story? Have you been there?
Well, maybe that's not the thing that happened, but i think, that there was a car on the Auto Deck full of Russian military equipment. And some Russian agents probably blew the ship up(that explains the holes seen on a subdivers taken video here in TH-cam, the holes were made from the inside and some explosive chemicals were found on the holes).
ivario 11 years later and people still blaming the Russians for literally everything that goes wrong.
137 of 1000 survived.
Ahem do not forget the deaths which was 825
Terminator fan2003 *852. ironically
So the front fell off...
The bow visire should have been at the stern not at the prow. To much pressure at the prow.
The USN, Royal Navy, and dozens of ferry lines have operated hundreds of safely designed ships with bow doors for over 80 years. There is nothing inherently wrong with bow doors from an engineering perspective. Design and redundancy are critical.
stupid construction
But how people on the engine room or somewhere saw on the security camera that the water wasn't coming in and ramp was in its normal place? When they saw it, the ship was 90° to starboard. They escaped by the chimney
Not true, by the official report they all stated that they saw water entering the car deck at huge volume
@@ndmz903 Well in the documentary they said that the ramp was on and only a little bit water came in from the front.
@@Kert69 Yeah the visor fell off and then the ramp opened ajar slightly, if it had opened fully the ship wouldve probably capsized in like 2 minutes.
@@ndmz903 The ramp was closed not slightly open. Water only splashed in, that's what they told.
@@Kert69 through where did the water splash in?
Nostalgia.
Cool! Some of the passengers were saved by Viking Line ferries and by Silja Line's one.
As I know, MS Mariella, MS Isabella, MS Silja Europa, and some more arrived to help
@@immigrantgaming420epic Yep, and some other cargo type ships and helicopter from finland and sweden.
@@immigrantgaming420epic Silja Symphony and Finnjet too, and other
@srvideos2 , is it possible to use this animation in a TV production? Do you know who owns the copyright or is it public domain? Thanks.
I know this ship has usinkebel
It's unsinkable!
ei olnud mingit pommi need sõja tehnika võis olla pardal aga need lihtsalt läksid põhja tormiga
Is it possible the visor could have ripped the hole which they found in the side of the vessel? I never thought of that before..
The fact that estonia s bow gate was damaged by the waves cousing the bow to pitch out of estonia s bow
Can someone please go down there and write "ei saa peittää" on the hull, just to make us swedes laugh a little.
Hey miks sa võtat teiste videosi!
Vittu sa mõtled? Kust ta selle oleks saanud võtta see pandi üles 12 aastat tagasi 11 aastat kui sa commenteerisid see oli esimene video sellest
im curious if this was made with flash
Terrible engineering I’m not a engineer and I can even see The Locking design is very bad
Don Love you can see that because that’s literally a whole video about how the front fell off, while knowing the front fell off. It wasn’t the mechanism though. Those were sound. It was the insufficient spacing for open sea conditions in heavy seas. Even the engineers expected this configuration to go for shoreline only. They also recognized and planned for this being a failpoint and if seas were violent for it to knock off the visor. The ramp was the failsafe, but the spacing insufficiency allowed the ramp to be yanked loose by the falling visor.
Voice: MV Estonia
Me: MS Estonia
It must have been the bow visir. A cruise ship of that caliber doesn't go down in 25 min or less. When the bow visir was deattached, the water poured in and the list became apparent. Stupid construction by the engineers. To bad it had to take over 850 life's before realizing how idiotic this was.
You know that after bow visor there is the vertical raised locked squarish car ramp.
Was the Front part ever found?
yes, it is now on Swedish military base
The front fell off
callum hardy 😂 long version: a wave hit the boat, and the front fell off
JAN HEVELIUS capsised 1 year earlier and flouted uppside down for 7 days so estonia should hawe done the same
Yes but not with two extra hols
This film shows everything what comission said, but it can't be the truth. Under the superstructure (car deck) in the hull there was 18000 m^3 of air, this ship couldn't sink, it should turn upside down (after 30 degrees list) and float but not sink. Survivors told about 50 degrees list, the one conclusion is that there was leakage in hull.
852 [*] We'll never forget
Sp dramatic when wisor get off, 1000s people are in the sea
Do you mean Visor not Wisor
wow
very few
MMM Narrator says “rolled rapidly to Stbd & sank stern first” ~ Video shows it rolling to port & sinking Bow first !! which is it ???
And of course the ramp is still closed, it never opened..
And the waves were only 5mts & wind 40+kts , nothing too dramatic..
It sank to starboard! It's angle was looking at the front not back and it sank in Front!
0:04 not MV estonia M/S estonia
kert tamme it was Mv estonia
The open car deck is a terrible construction that has lead to several castrophies. And to top it off, this ramp housing is completely idiotic. Criminally bad design.
I doubted the events outined in the movie a long time. Especially since Swedish authorities behaved so strange afterwards and since the international inquiry into the disaster was obviously corrupt. However, what is outlined in this video is the simplest explanation. One reason the inquiry was so high handed might be that to them the cause of the accident was obvious from the start. International shipping standards had been implementing new guidelines and were very aware of the problems with open car decks and this general construction, ever since the Herald of Free Enterprise accident 1987. Unfortunately these did not reach Estonia.
The monster ferry ship I will NEVER arrive with . 🚢
Ithink there is a secret i think Piht escaped and goverment gave him money to get out of the baltic states and start a new life somewhere else.
Martin1335 I think you give humans waaay more credit than we have earned for being able to pull off elaborate plots. Most of us can’t even fool our mom with the help of all our friends. In fact, the more people helping the plot, the faster mom figures you out. Organization on the fly is not our strong suit. We are wicked enough, but not clever enough to be super villains.
another robot voice...I am gone
Does it really sound like robot?
Plot Hole regarding the supposed tearing off of the visor:
Even if you could not see the visor itself from the bridge, you should be able to see the light inside the garage illuminating the sea in front of the ship in the middle of the night. Nobody saw anything to this effect. The Commission has never commented upon this fact.
bjnboy. sadly there are many other light sources at the front of the vessel aft of the bow that would obscure any light from the vehicle deck plus I think you underestimate the sea conditions which is understandable. Half the time the bow may not be visible for wave and spray. The inner ramp also never actually fell fully forward as this narrator suggests, only slightly but sadly, enough.
The bow visor is not the only barrier between ocean and lighted inner car deck. After the Visor there is the vertically raised and locked squarish car ramp. So even if you loose the visor the inner light source shines against the inner side of the ramp. You can see it on some pictures of the closing Estonia.
Oooh...I thought it was operator error...i.e. they failed to secure the bough opening!
Only60Games John maybe you are thinking of the Zeebrugge Ferry disaster?
It is no possible!
very unlucky
just unlucky in the baltic
If that were the case, she would have floated up and down for at least 48 hours. But that's not what happened, because there is a hole on the starboard side of the bow at the bar line. Because those who had cabins on deck zero noticed that there was water on the cabin floor, and it was they who were rescued. And because they noticed that something was not right with the ship.
I think it is quite likely that people thought something was wrong as objects would be sliding in one instead of both directions due to the list.
FH: It is not reasonable to think a ship will float, especially with open access to the sea. Above the main deck they are NOT watertight, and will also fill with water. In any case, ever ship has a certain point point at which it will capsize and sink. "Metacentric Stability".
Thats the problem.. the Vehicle deck wasn't watertight.
Cheers for the video mate.. finally understand it all
Kotik112 it was watertight.
you dont know shit
@@steffe8103 IT HAD NO WATER DOORES. IT BEE OPEN TOO ALL THEMS DECKS. I WAS THERE, I KNOW AL LABOUTTE ITS!
@@ilovecops5499no
My only question is. How the hell did it sink STERN first, if all the damage happened on the BOW?
This simulation is wrong, Because the bulbous valve is perfectly intact without any damage at all.
ouch but its not true story about estonia
What about the 4 metre hole ripped in the starboard of the ship??
DId you know M/S Estonia smuggled military equipment?
The visor and The ramp were CLOSED!!!! LOOK AT SONAR IMAGES 1/10 1994. THE RAMP WAS CLOSED UNTIL 2020.
Nice simulation, but sorry, that’s not how it happened
Please evaluate
estonia not sink
Ms Estonia was sinking ship was defeated by the third time of night and has been sink 10 people dead 7085 people are save
853 pepeoles dead
are you all right in the head my friend
What do you think was the real reason?
Well the front fell off.
maybe the lights were switched off
Natas Corpus if you were standing directly in front of the ship at the level of the car deck, you’d have seen light. If you were standing at the bridge you would have a blind spot caused by the locations relative to each other. You wouldn’t even be looking at the water immediately closest to the car deck, through which some light would have traveled. If you’ve ever dropped a flashlight into the sea then you know light does disappear under seawater relatively quickly. If that’s not enough, there was a lot of light from other sources closer, and much as city lights make stars seem to be dim or even to be absent altogether, the ambient light would have also made it hard to see any light that managed to filter through from the car deck. The lights were on though. A crew member reported a cctv showing water coming from the direction of the bow visor early on. The cameras were there for security and not to remote view the state of the blind spot, so they were showing the cars instead of the ramp. Also, one survivor at least remembers being close enough he feared being washed into the car deck as the bow was disappearing under the water. I think after this they began training cameras on the ramp itself instead of trusting instruments to relay the condition and state of ramps. Makes you wonder why they don’t have at least some baffles in these open floor plan designs where it’s going to slosh around and turtle the boat.
LIES!!
The ship's captain is guilty of keeping speed too fast in this weather!
Estonia was 14 years old. She was old... Her visor vas REALLY old.. Give her some respect! #RespectForMSEstonia
not true till they will bring the ship up.
@@corettaha7855
You're replying to an ELEVEN year old comment.
You haven't explained the shockwaves mechanics or how it was able to isolate the doorlocks. Remember even with the door locks open the visor is being hydrolically held shut. So only a tsunami could pivot the visor off its hinge. Yep hinge failure let the ocean shove the visor up and break the locks the weight of the visor then did the rest to any last resistance. In fact these findings in video unhelpful...verdict....Passengers and crew murdered by the greed of rich people
Nice tinfoil hat you got there. And what exactly was the benefit for rich people to do it?
The hydraulics was an interesting point. Until you rode off in the #rothschildscontroltheweather direction with it. I’m betting they got subjected to enough forces after the securing locks were broken to eventually compromise them and result in failure. Sounds crazy I know. But either that or the Illuminati did it. Or space aliens.
RAG: 1. The sea can overcome two (2) hydraulic rams easily using the massive size of the visor moment arm. 2. There is no reason the hydraulic system would be maintained in positive pressure constantly after the door is closed. That only leads to leaking seals and worn out hydraulic pump.
You don’t know what you’re talking about😂
Wrong.
great material! but tink, that wasn't the real reason, why the ship sank.
Did a submarine collide with the vessel?
no it did not there evidence that says shows Estonia's locks broken and there were no submarines close to Estonia during the report.
@@springlockfanatic Are you sure about that? There may be far more to this story than meets the eye. Military hard wear wad being smuggled out of the forner USSR both on that route along the Baltic and on that vessle. Further, a big fuck off hole on the starboard side of the hull waa found by later dive crews to the wreck thus substantuating why that vessle sank so quickly. Why was body retreval and the recovery of the ship (quite an easy task in 85 meters of depth) banned and the wreck covered (or an attempt) in stones and concrete? That bow visor may indeed have come off, but it is very possible that another series of events and an alternative narrative needs to be considered.
@@garryharriman7349 well there was a submarine during there but it was 2 miles away facing away from estonia , also no wrecks found of submarine there and also the submarine was sending messages back home in USSR and after the soviet was over the case file of that was the location of submarine just entering the gulf of bothnia,after estonia sinking.and estonia sink so fast because theres a reason why let me tell you why,you think watertight doors can hold the ship even from capsizing well the glass could not hold the water and it broke making water pour in and it capsized because there was more cars on starboard.
No
IT was a bomb
Nature Minecraft in real life No it wasn't.
IT WAS NOT A BOMB OMG IDIOTSSSSSSS
Nature Minecraft in real life that’s a great metaphor. The ship went off like a bomb. The waves shelled the ship with an artillery of deadly forces. I approve.
Jumble Wary the aliens 👽
It would never have sunk that fast by just the vizor coming off probably by sabotage/bombs
Matti Suutarinen scooping in seawater like a giant ladle. Impossible that should compromise a boat. Proves it was terrorists obviously.
This is all wrong. The ship was illegaly transporting millitary weapons such as ( guns,ammo,bombs ). When the visor was pulled up the main "broken" piece was thrown back in the sea that there would be no evidence. 9 of the 10 millitary boxes were pulled up. 1 was never found so it is still somewhere.
there was no millitary boxes it was a car fary and i know this beacouse im a estonian :/
@Verbal Dk the lulz
Wrong. Its fully known that Estonia had at least 2 occasions russian military material smuggled in to Sweden. A high official in the Swedish customs were commanded to let those vehicle through whitout any inspection. @@csn9935
I believe militaries do snuggle and transport weapons. I don’t believe they automatically are the cause of waves hitting boats knocking the front off. Otherwise this would be more common occurrence and people on cruises would sleep in scuba gear anticipating it.
Women Manner and why the salvage company would consent to participate in the conspiracy in this fiction is never explained. I read an article detailing the origination of the various urban legends of Estonia, and it’s an interesting read. These stories were published in tabloids almost immediately (speculation, rumor), and they are still retold with the same details as scripted at that time.
It was attacked by submarine
There's hole near that bow
no because if it was the bow visor will break depending where the hull was and the torpedo will do more damage then that because it has explosives so no