In your 2020 edition of the search and seizure survival guide you justify a warrantless entry into the home for a misdemeanor crime under hot pursuit: People v. Lloyd, 216 Cal. App. 3d 1425 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 1989) What has changed?
How do you justify the fresh pursuit scenario you mention regarding extreme cases when it seems that scenario fits Payton Vs New York which they ruled was unlawful? Payton doesn't mention the timeline so i don't know if that case was a few hours or days situation.Thanks
I guess the question still remains is knowledge of whether it's his home, a friends home or s strangers home where then it becomes a home invasion. Then the question of destruction of evidence i.e. drugs or maybe to retrieve a weapon a lot of unknown variables,
Excellent video. Thank you
Nice explanation. Hope all is well
In your 2020 edition of the search and seizure survival guide you justify a warrantless entry into the home for a misdemeanor crime under hot pursuit:
People v. Lloyd, 216 Cal. App. 3d 1425 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 1989)
What has changed?
Lange v California Can’t do it without exigency. Our books have been updated to reflect this change.
How do you justify the fresh pursuit scenario you mention regarding extreme cases when it seems that scenario fits Payton Vs New York which they ruled was unlawful? Payton doesn't mention the timeline so i don't know if that case was a few hours or days situation.Thanks
Police can come in my home anytime!!
Mmmmmm
I guess the question still remains is knowledge of whether it's his home, a friends home or s strangers home where then it becomes a home invasion. Then the question of destruction of evidence i.e. drugs or maybe to retrieve a weapon a lot of unknown variables,