McKinnon used to be my go-to, but he can do one now. Your videos give me everything I’m looking for - honesty, humility, enthusiasm, positivity, gratefulness. Don’t stop what you’re doing Henry.
I have to say your enthusiasm for the outdoors and photography is inspiring Henry. You make me want to get off my arse and get out there and shoot something (in the figurative/photographic sense). Your photography tips are useful too, cheers.
I think I agree with you with the no ND in the waterfall pic...water become too black in the 40 sec...but is all very subjective as usual!!Both great pics mate!!Thanks for your videos again!!!Keep it up!!OUTTT
In this instance I prefer the shorter exposure as I like moving water to look like water rather than a jug of cream being poured into a bowl of steam. But I was glad to hear your recommendation because I bought my first ND filter last month - a 10-stop 😄
10 stop is always in my bag, was the first filter I bought and love it. In terms of the image I preferred the one without the use of the 10 stop as personally i try to strike the balance between movement and detail for rivers and waterfalls. I like to use my 10 stop on seascapes and cityscape images along with my 13 & 16 stops. Nice images Henry and a good discussion to boot
I'm a bit surprised that there is so little difference in the waterfall photos. I have no real preference here, but the quarter-second exposure gives me most of what I'd want. Thanks for the comparison!
Personally preferred the shorter exposure, Henry. The longer exposure seemed to make the water too "solid". Not sure if that makes sense. Nonetheless superb pics again H and the explanation of your thinking really helpful. Thank you.
Just bought myself a 10 stop and a variable + CPF 2 in 1 after watching this and various other videos. Absolutely love watching your videos man. Legend!
Henry, thank you for showing us that the best part of landscape photography is getting out and discovering the beauty of our world...... Living the dream! MINT
Here I am, backtracking through your videos. I really like the longer exposure shots. The waterfall water just looks smoother and to my eye, the shorter exposure water looks rough, but blurry.
Great vid Henry. I always have my 10 stop in the bag, but hardly ever use it. The waterfall shot is exactly why I don't use it much. I prefer the shorter exposure - you still get all the movement but retain some detail or texture. The 10 stop turns everything milky which I don't enjoy as much. Great for seascapes, smearing clouds, smoothing ripples on lakes etc, but too much for a waterfall, for me.
As for the shutter speed preference for the waterfalls, I prefer the 1/4 second exposure in this case because it's closer to reality, closer to what your eye sees. If you are looking for a my magical/ethereal look, the of course the longer SS works. I came to this video three years later because I'm looking to get an ND and don't have the money to buy an entire kit of them. But, I also don't want to get a VND. So, you're the second video I've seen recommending the 10 stop as a good single filter. Thanks!
I personally like the shorter exposures as there is still some detail in the water. Thanks for the great ND advice. Just working out what I would like for my camera now!!
Hi Henry well I would be stuck on that one as I like it with and without filter on. I suppose I would do all like you did and admire them. They are brilliant.
Super late to this, but the first comparison I liked the shorter exposure/no filter one better, and then the second, the longer exposure one gave me a big 'wow' moment. That's pretty consistent with how I feel about filter use in general though, I really think it just depends on the shot!
i find myself attracted to the softer look of the long exposure. but nether is wrong or right. both are excellent and your footage is nicly put together and is great to watch and inspiring, Keep it up. Im the opposite side of the UK to you in Lincolnshire and your very right about beauty is all around and that you dont need to travel for miles, its all in your door step.
oh man i wish i knew what you where talking about,it all seems so complicated just to take a picture.cant say which exposure i liked best as i dont know what on earth you mean,all i can say is the images were beautiful,the waterfall ones are just gorgeous and thank you for sharing,cheers Henry.
@@janetsharp122 thank you Janet but the reason i dont understand is because im not a photographer i find it fascinating and love the images Henry posts but the technical side is way over my head,but thank you for the kind words,best wishes.
Henry, your enthusiasm is so infectious! All I want to do is go out with my camera right now! The only problem with that, it's a little dark at 6.30pm in the winter! Ah well.....☹️....👍 Ps... Loving your videos
Thanks Henry. Good advice. If People were only ever to buy 2 filters, then a 10 stop ND and a Cir Polariser. It appeared a somewhat overcast on your photoshoot vlog..it took a 10 stop to get the SS down. even in those conditions. So important for people to know that if you try to shoot in strong midday sunlight even a 10 stop will not be strong enough (hence why manufacturers produce the 15 stop ND and/or produce filters that are 'stackable'' filters to increase strength. But for one's first ND.... Yep, 10 stop all the way......
i like both, depends what you want. the more analogue smoothing of the water was cool. there's something nice and craft about doing it with glass and time (and not photoshop)
The shorter shutter speed after some contemplation. As someone who is just about to embark on a landscape journey, i'm usually wildlife, that was really helpful. I've invested in a few filters, including a 6 stop ND & now can't wait to get out there and try my hand at a landscape vlog.
Both hold their own beauty. The shorter exposure has a more natural look, retaining some movement but the 10 stop is so calming to look at. Thanks once again for your informative videos
Another excellent video, Henry. You're right about the 10 stop filter. I use the Lee 10 stop and I'm addicted to long exposure photography. It's pure magic. Thanks for doing what you're doing. We all do appreciate your hard work but as you say, LIVING THE DREAM.
Hi Henry I am a new photography student in Australia and wanted to say thanks for your channel it’s awesome! My pick is the longer exposures the tonal range is better than the shorter exposure and the water looks more magical
You are my favourite TH-cam camera man, good real world advice and no hard sell. I live in the Peak District so plenty of opportunity to practice your teaching 👏
My first filter purchase was a 10stop filter and I just love using it with my waterfall images....my next filter purchase will be a 6 stop. I love all the images but prefer the longer shutter speed for the first of the 2 waterfall images and the shorter shutter speed on the one after it.
cracking shots. i definitely lean toward the longer exposures, although even the shots without the filter turned out with a decent amount of movement in the water. the only thing i can think of adding to your video might be a mention of dealing with color cast and white balance when using the 10 stop. thanks for sharing.
I agree with Ben Thorne. Personally, I like both long and short exposures…hope that’s ok. I received a ND filter in a filter package I purchased I had no idea what it was for. Thanks for this great video, now I know what the ND filter is for.
I appreciate that sort of opinion: sometimes when watching TH-cam photographers it's assumed everyone had an unlimited budget, but the reality of it is I'm having a hard time justifying putting any money into this hobby! Some good advice there mate!
I've just started out as a beginner doing landscape photography, mainly seascapes and I opted for a 10 stop ND filter as my first one. Would definitely agree this was the right decision.
Hi Henry nice video, regarding your question I personally prefer the longer exposures, they give a more ethereal look to those landscapes and waterfalls. If it weren't so cloudy in the pond shot I would also attach a polariser. Good photos nonetheless, keep them vids coming.
The longer exposure for me, Every time Henry I suppose it’s horses for courses really each type of exposures have there advantages. You’re enthusiasm to photography is second to non. Please keep producing your amazing Vlogs across the Bowland Fells.
I have got a 10 stop filter I love it I enjoy long exposure photography even though I am just still learning about photography, love both images thank you for this video
I think the shorter one. I like to go for 1 ~ 2 seconds in these sort of shots to bring some drama to the water in the basin below the waterfall. Great video as ever mate. Bowland Fells look brilliant 👌
Great video Henry. My first filter was a ND10. Indeed you can do a lot with such a filter. The point is when you shoot a waterfall or a river, in order to emphasize on the water flow, how strong is, then a filter like ND6 or ND4, probably would be more suitable.
Both images look good, but like you I have a preference for the shorter(1/4 sec) shot as the waterfall maintains its detail, whereas the longer one moves into the fine art genre. Also I like the NISI circular filters as you can add two, eg a three stop and a ten stop, to get a thirteen stop; good value. Thanks as always. Keep on hiking; keep sharing. Mike in Oz
Great video, regarding the waterfall images, I greatly prefer the shorter exposures, in this scenario I don't think a 10 stopper adds anything. For faster moving water like this, I almost always go for shutter speeds between 1/10th of a second to 1 second, anything in-between these values depending on the speed of the water. Similarly, on a beach when trying to shoot retreating wave patterns.
Its surprising how little difference there is in falling water between 6 stop and 10 stop but I much prefer the cleaner images produced by the 10 stop, well chosen subject matter Henry, mint!
liked both the long and the short exposures. The short has plenty of blurring in the water fall but retains some nice textures in the water below the fall. The long exposure removes the texture in the water but really helps the detail in the rocks to stand out. For the first set I prefer the short exposure the water texture helps connect the foreground to the background. In the second set I like the long exposure I like the way it makes that central bolder like an island stand out.
I like the shorter exposure it gives more detail in the water shows more movement. Would a polarising filter cut down on some of the reflection on the water surface. Still great shots.
I'm really enjoying these 'technical" videos you're doing at the moment, Henry. On the final 2 photos I thought I was going prefer the shorter exposure (and it was great) but I really loved the way the longer exposure completely smoothed out the water in the plunge pool area. Just goes to show, you don't know what's going to work best until you try, I guess.
i've been taking a pictures for more than 35 years and I bought a 10-stop filter (first ND Filter) a long time ago and I would do it again today in this row. About your shots: I prefer the examples of the longer exposure but, as is so often in life, the truth is, I guess, between these two exposures 😉 take care Henry
I was the same when I got my first ND Filter, I got 6 and wish it was the 10. But, as you pointed out in the video with the second shot on the water fall, the 6 stop would be better. I say get 2 filters, 6 and 10 to start. (if you can only afford one filter then 10 first then 6). Also, don't buy cheap and keep away from the variable ones. For me, if paying about £30-40 for one then that's a good start. Great information Henry, and great shots too!
Another great video Henry and as many have commented your enthusiasm is infectious. Right now I prefer the short exposure. It keeps detail in the pool but still shows movement in the waterfall. However, if you ask me tomorrow it will probably be the longer exposure. They are both great images. Keep up the great work mate.
As for my preference, soooo hard to choose! But I’m leaning towards the 1/4s without the ND filter. I like the ferocity of the water showing through. But honestly, they’re both worthy of printing and hanging on the wall! Thank you for posting these videos. You answer questions I didn’t know I had!
For the first picture both the quarter of a second exposure and the 40th exposure both good. With a second image the one 40th Ave. a second with the filter is definitely the better of the two.
Really enjoy these videos. Difficult to make a choice really, both the shorter and the longer exposures of the waterfall bring something to the images. The creamy cascade with a little texture in the pool, and the sand like cascade with the completely frozen pool; both syles are delicious.
Love your videos and your enthusiasm. I prefer the shorter exposure, can still see a bit of movement and texture but that's just my personal preference. Keep up the good work.
I have a 10 stop filter which I have used for many years, however, I never use it for running water as in waterfalls. I prefer to use 1/4 or 1/8 second to maintain a little action, coupled with a polariser to remove the glare and reflections and an appropriate f stop I can achieve my desired image. So yes I prefer the unfiltered image
McKinnon used to be my go-to, but he can do one now. Your videos give me everything I’m looking for - honesty, humility, enthusiasm, positivity, gratefulness. Don’t stop what you’re doing Henry.
Thanks Ben, means a lot mate
BT said it perfectly. The calmness lack of hype along with Henry's maximization of his equipment teaches volumes.
For sure. McKinnon makes great cinematic videos but always feels a bit too flashy. Much better to just get some good solid information like this.
I actually like the shorter exposure as it gives more details
Adding a polariser would have given a bit of detail below the water I think.
I think I prefer the 10 stop shots . It adds a grace to the flow of the water . Thanks Henry 👍
I have to say your enthusiasm for the outdoors and photography is inspiring Henry. You make me want to get off my arse and get out there and shoot something (in the figurative/photographic sense). Your photography tips are useful too, cheers.
I think I agree with you with the no ND in the waterfall pic...water become too black in the 40 sec...but is all very subjective as usual!!Both great pics mate!!Thanks for your videos again!!!Keep it up!!OUTTT
I prefer the longer exposures. I recently bought a 10 stop for this very reason, and you've now confirmed that I did the right thing.
In this instance I prefer the shorter exposure as I like moving water to look like water rather than a jug of cream being poured into a bowl of steam. But I was glad to hear your recommendation because I bought my first ND filter last month - a 10-stop 😄
For me it’s the longer exposures, I like the effect on the water and sky that the 10 ND filter creates ‘mint’
10 stop is always in my bag, was the first filter I bought and love it. In terms of the image I preferred the one without the use of the 10 stop as personally i try to strike the balance between movement and detail for rivers and waterfalls. I like to use my 10 stop on seascapes and cityscape images along with my 13 & 16 stops. Nice images Henry and a good discussion to boot
I'm a bit surprised that there is so little difference in the waterfall photos. I have no real preference here, but the quarter-second exposure gives me most of what I'd want. Thanks for the comparison!
longer exposures are beautiful, but the shorter ones help to capture the violence in the water. hard to choose, really!
Personally preferred the shorter exposure, Henry. The longer exposure seemed to make the water too "solid". Not sure if that makes sense. Nonetheless superb pics again H and the explanation of your thinking really helpful. Thank you.
Definitely the longer exposures. Provides more depth and richness of color.
I’m going for the longer exposures buddy they look more like fine art images, but the 1/4 seconds shots look more natural to me.
Just bought myself a 10 stop and a variable + CPF 2 in 1 after watching this and various other videos. Absolutely love watching your videos man. Legend!
Henry, thank you for showing us that the best part of landscape photography is getting out and discovering the beauty of our world...... Living the dream! MINT
My pleasure!
Here I am, backtracking through your videos. I really like the longer exposure shots. The waterfall water just looks smoother and to my eye, the shorter exposure water looks rough, but blurry.
Hi Henry. I prefer the short exposure on the 1st image and the long exposure on the 2nd. No pleasing some people 😀
Great vid Henry. I always have my 10 stop in the bag, but hardly ever use it. The waterfall shot is exactly why I don't use it much. I prefer the shorter exposure - you still get all the movement but retain some detail or texture. The 10 stop turns everything milky which I don't enjoy as much. Great for seascapes, smearing clouds, smoothing ripples on lakes etc, but too much for a waterfall, for me.
As for the shutter speed preference for the waterfalls, I prefer the 1/4 second exposure in this case because it's closer to reality, closer to what your eye sees. If you are looking for a my magical/ethereal look, the of course the longer SS works. I came to this video three years later because I'm looking to get an ND and don't have the money to buy an entire kit of them. But, I also don't want to get a VND. So, you're the second video I've seen recommending the 10 stop as a good single filter. Thanks!
Hi, I'm a real novice photographer but I prefer the 4sec exposure, for me it doesn't quite stop all movement, it looks just real. Regards
I personally like the shorter exposures as there is still some detail in the water. Thanks for the great ND advice. Just working out what I would like for my camera now!!
Hi Henry well I would be stuck on that one as I like it with and without filter on. I suppose I would do all like you did and admire them. They are brilliant.
The Shorter exposures works well in color, the longer one in B/W
Super late to this, but the first comparison I liked the shorter exposure/no filter one better, and then the second, the longer exposure one gave me a big 'wow' moment. That's pretty consistent with how I feel about filter use in general though, I really think it just depends on the shot!
i find myself attracted to the softer look of the long exposure. but nether is wrong or right. both are excellent and your footage is nicly put together and is great to watch and inspiring, Keep it up.
Im the opposite side of the UK to you in Lincolnshire and your very right about beauty is all around and that you dont need to travel for miles, its all in your door step.
oh man i wish i knew what you where talking about,it all seems so complicated just to take a picture.cant say which exposure i liked best as i dont know what on earth you mean,all i can say is the images were beautiful,the waterfall ones are just gorgeous and thank you for sharing,cheers Henry.
Honestly Steven it will all make sense at some point ...we have all been there..just keep reading and taking photos .
@@janetsharp122 thank you Janet but the reason i dont understand is because im not a photographer i find it fascinating and love the images Henry posts but the technical side is way over my head,but thank you for the kind words,best wishes.
@@stevenharland556 ..you are welcome ..I understand where you are coming from , take care ...
Henry, your enthusiasm is so infectious! All I want to do is go out with my camera right now! The only problem with that, it's a little dark at 6.30pm in the winter!
Ah well.....☹️....👍
Ps... Loving your videos
Xo
.hey aloBla
Al are w
@@scottirvine2754 ??
@@gebsrus Don't know what the confusion is. Looks like Scott's comment is in plain English. lol
@@sdspeedy1 😂🤣😂🤣
Thanks Henry. Good advice. If People were only ever to buy 2 filters, then a 10 stop ND and a Cir Polariser. It appeared a somewhat overcast on your photoshoot vlog..it took a 10 stop to get the SS down. even in those conditions. So important for people to know that if you try to shoot in strong midday sunlight even a 10 stop will not be strong enough (hence why manufacturers produce the 15 stop ND and/or produce filters that are 'stackable'' filters to increase strength. But for one's first ND.... Yep, 10 stop all the way......
i like both, depends what you want. the more analogue smoothing of the water was cool. there's something nice and craft about doing it with glass and time (and not photoshop)
The shorter shutter speed after some contemplation. As someone who is just about to embark on a landscape journey, i'm usually wildlife, that was really helpful. I've invested in a few filters, including a 6 stop ND & now can't wait to get out there and try my hand at a landscape vlog.
Longer. Thanks for this video, I ran into over-exposure issues today and this answers that question. Keep trekking, mate 👍
I like the shorter exposure on the vertical image, and the longer exposure on the landscape orientation one
I find the shorter ones really interesting.
Not too fuzzy, not to still.
Just about right.
Good video as always mate👍
I enjoy both but the long exposure adds some moodyness or drama; more artistic. Thanks again for the tips!
Both hold their own beauty. The shorter exposure has a more natural look, retaining some movement but the 10 stop is so calming to look at. Thanks once again for your informative videos
Personally, I like both of them. I also got a liking to the faster shutter speed when catching waves crashing.
Awesome video, great shots.
Thanks for watching!
Another excellent video, Henry. You're right about the 10 stop filter. I use the Lee 10 stop and I'm addicted to long exposure photography. It's pure magic. Thanks for doing what you're doing. We all do appreciate your hard work but as you say, LIVING THE DREAM.
Great video , absolutely no preference ,
Prefer the longer exposure, I like that it looks surreal. you really do have a communicable enthusiasm.
I like the longer exposure better. Gives me a sense of tranquility of the whole scene. Thank you for a nice explained video process.
I think that the shorter exposure its more dramatic, show as more power on the movement. Shorter or longer depends the subjet.
Wow you give me impression how much u enjoy taking photo and your love of nature , so helpful thanks
Glad you enjoy it!
Both are really nice but I think I prefer the longer exposure. That’s tougher than I thought it would be to pick between the two.
I think the long exposure brings out more of the tannin color in the water and produces a better overall effect.
I have had good photos with my 6 stop so far so in time will go for the 10 stop 😊, I like your enthusiasm its how I feel when out with my camera
Hi Henry I am a new photography student in Australia and wanted to say thanks for your channel it’s awesome! My pick is the longer exposures the tonal range is better than the shorter exposure and the water looks more magical
Both of the filter ones win. Just something that draws you in deeper to them both.
You are my favourite TH-cam camera man, good real world advice and no hard sell. I live in the Peak District so plenty of opportunity to practice your teaching 👏
Thanks for the kind words Mark
@@HenryTurnerphoto your passion is infectious lol
Henry, I stumbled across your channel some time ago. Your enthusiasm is infectious!!
I am full of admiration for the knowledge, skills of perseverance in making films .. thank you, best regards
The 2nd image on both for me. I've just recently purchased a 10 stop filter and can't wait to get out and try it. Your videos are great 👍.
Very good discussion. You even executed and give examples on how ND filter works. Thanks!
Longer exposure by far! You’ve inspired me to purchase a 10 stop NiSi filter & can’t wait to use it. Thanks for the great videos, very inspirational 📷
My first filter purchase was a 10stop filter and I just love using it with my waterfall images....my next filter purchase will be a 6 stop. I love all the images but prefer the longer shutter speed for the first of the 2 waterfall images and the shorter shutter speed on the one after it.
cracking shots. i definitely lean toward the longer exposures, although even the shots without the filter turned out with a decent amount of movement in the water. the only thing i can think of adding to your video might be a mention of dealing with color cast and white balance when using the 10 stop. thanks for sharing.
Yes Henry, talk about the color shift and white balance. Correctable in post?
I agree with Ben Thorne. Personally, I like both long and short exposures…hope that’s ok. I received a ND filter in a filter package I purchased I had no idea what it was for. Thanks for this great video, now I know what the ND filter is for.
Definitely the longer exposure. Just love the glass look
I appreciate that sort of opinion: sometimes when watching TH-cam photographers it's assumed everyone had an unlimited budget, but the reality of it is I'm having a hard time justifying putting any money into this hobby! Some good advice there mate!
Thank you, was trying to decide between the 6 and 10 stop and i think based off this video I will go for the 10 stop.
I've just started out as a beginner doing landscape photography, mainly seascapes and I opted for a 10 stop ND filter as my first one. Would definitely agree this was the right decision.
I think the short exposure leaves some detail in the water and still shows movement.
Hi Henry nice video, regarding your question I personally prefer the longer exposures, they give a more ethereal look to those landscapes and waterfalls. If it weren't so cloudy in the pond shot I would also attach a polariser. Good photos nonetheless, keep them vids coming.
The longer exposure for me, Every time Henry I suppose it’s horses for courses really each type of exposures have there advantages. You’re enthusiasm to photography is second to non. Please keep producing your amazing Vlogs across the Bowland Fells.
That little lake shot is peacefully stunning. Love the waterfalls. Great work Henry!!!
Great video. I liked that. For me the slower exposure is the way to go… have ordered my 1st ND at 10 stop as a result 👍
Love your enthusiasm. Just got a variable nd. Can't get out to try it due to restrictions. Oh, I prefer the 10.😉
My personal choice of your images at the waterfall are at 1/4 sec. Thanks for the video.
Great advice for people like myself just breaking into long exposure photography...thank you ...preferred the 40s shots myself..😊
Both are nice. My preference,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,the long exposure.
Great video. I like the longer exposure to make the pool of water like glass.
I have got a 10 stop filter I love it I enjoy long exposure photography even though I am just still learning about photography, love both images thank you for this video
I think the shorter one. I like to go for 1 ~ 2 seconds in these sort of shots to bring some drama to the water in the basin below the waterfall. Great video as ever mate. Bowland Fells look brilliant 👌
I'm rather new to your channel but I really appreciate the time you take to develop the between shots compositions.
I like them both, haha. I like the detail in the lower 1/2 of the images for the 1/4sec, but the 1/40sec for the upper half.
Great video Henry. My first filter was a ND10. Indeed you can do a lot with such a filter. The point is when you shoot a waterfall or a river, in order to emphasize on the water flow, how strong is, then a filter like ND6 or ND4, probably would be more suitable.
Truely magnificent, Bravo! 40 sec exposure was quite marvelous shot I must say!
Both images look good, but like you I have a preference for the shorter(1/4 sec) shot as the waterfall maintains its detail, whereas the longer one moves into the fine art genre. Also I like the NISI circular filters as you can add two, eg a three stop and a ten stop, to get a thirteen stop; good value. Thanks as always. Keep on hiking; keep sharing.
Mike in Oz
Beautiful photos.....and I love the shorter exposures the flow was just nice in them .
Great video, regarding the waterfall images, I greatly prefer the shorter exposures, in this scenario I don't think a 10 stopper adds anything. For faster moving water like this, I almost always go for shutter speeds between 1/10th of a second to 1 second, anything in-between these values depending on the speed of the water. Similarly, on a beach when trying to shoot retreating wave patterns.
Its surprising how little difference there is in falling water between 6 stop and 10 stop but I much prefer the cleaner images produced by the 10 stop, well chosen subject matter Henry, mint!
My first ND filter was a 10 stop and it’s always been my favourite. Great video.
WOW! I definitely prefer the longer than short personally! Incredible shots!
I like both! But think I like the silky effect of the longer exposure better.
liked both the long and the short exposures. The short has plenty of blurring in the water fall but retains some nice textures in the water below the fall. The long exposure removes the texture in the water but really helps the detail in the rocks to stand out. For the first set I prefer the short exposure the water texture helps connect the foreground to the background. In the second set I like the long exposure I like the way it makes that central bolder like an island stand out.
I like the shorter exposure it gives more detail in the water shows more movement. Would a polarising filter cut down on some of the reflection on the water surface. Still great shots.
I'm really enjoying these 'technical" videos you're doing at the moment, Henry. On the final 2 photos I thought I was going prefer the shorter exposure (and it was great) but I really loved the way the longer exposure completely smoothed out the water in the plunge pool area. Just goes to show, you don't know what's going to work best until you try, I guess.
i've been taking a pictures for more than 35 years and I bought a 10-stop filter (first ND Filter) a long time ago and I would do it again today in this row. About your shots: I prefer the examples of the longer exposure but, as is so often in life, the truth is, I guess, between these two exposures 😉 take care Henry
I was the same when I got my first ND Filter, I got 6 and wish it was the 10. But, as you pointed out in the video with the second shot on the water fall, the 6 stop would be better. I say get 2 filters, 6 and 10 to start. (if you can only afford one filter then 10 first then 6). Also, don't buy cheap and keep away from the variable ones. For me, if paying about £30-40 for one then that's a good start. Great information Henry, and great shots too!
Great advice Stephen and thanks for watching mate
for me .. the faster shot....i prefer the detail in the rocks etc leading my eye to the fall..
Another great video Henry and as many have commented your enthusiasm is infectious. Right now I prefer the short exposure. It keeps detail in the pool but still shows movement in the waterfall. However, if you ask me tomorrow it will probably be the longer exposure. They are both great images. Keep up the great work mate.
As for my preference, soooo hard to choose! But I’m leaning towards the 1/4s without the ND filter. I like the ferocity of the water showing through. But honestly, they’re both worthy of printing and hanging on the wall! Thank you for posting these videos. You answer questions I didn’t know I had!
For the first picture both the quarter of a second exposure and the 40th
exposure both good. With a second image the one 40th Ave. a second with the filter is definitely the better of the two.
Love the shorter bc I like a bit of detail still but must admit the smoothed out water is pretty cool to look at as well. Still, shorter for me.
Really enjoy these videos. Difficult to make a choice really, both the shorter and the longer exposures of the waterfall bring something to the images. The creamy cascade with a little texture in the pool, and the sand like cascade with the completely frozen pool; both syles are delicious.
Many thanks!
Great stuff! I do not have a ND filter and I have not known that I needed one, but I am still learning. Thanks for sharing your perspective!
Simplicity as usual. Love your style.
Definitely the long exposure photo eas better. Extremely helpful. Thanks brother 😊.
Love your videos and your enthusiasm. I prefer the shorter exposure, can still see a bit of movement and texture but that's just my personal preference.
Keep up the good work.
I have a 10 stop filter which I have used for many years, however, I never use it for running water as in waterfalls. I prefer to use 1/4 or 1/8 second to maintain a little action, coupled with a polariser to remove the glare and reflections and an appropriate f stop I can achieve my desired image. So yes I prefer the unfiltered image