After playing with my new UI changes, I can say that having a bigger map is legit like cheating. It is so nice how much info you can get so fast. Try it out!!!
I wish in the future they would add a setting feature where we can set keybinds for each characters. Kinda how overwatch is with theirs. I only need RMB when using Oath and Hudson for their 1st abilities but im stuck using the keybind generally cause I dont wanna keep on changing binds every game. Using RMB on other hunters is awkward for me.
Great video, Paz. Looking forward to seeing your next upload from you. I hit the thumbs up button on your post. Keep up the awesome work! Your insights on the camera settings were particularly eye-opening. Have you considered how different key bindings might impact new players transitioning from other genres?
I don't know all the characters too well, but im sure ghost does in fact reload and it's relevant since the forst bullets of his magazine deal more dmg
@@MuvvLuvv as he said, he has an i9 14900k and a 4080 Super. With a PC like that he could play this game at 4k max settings and still get double the fps of the average person gets at 1080p. And really, pairing a 4080 Super with a 1080p monitor is just a waste of money. You are paying for a really expensive GPU and never using it fully. A 1440p monitor would make a lot more sense, and you don't have to give up on refresh rate with modern monitors.
@dafelix he won't get 540 constant fps with 1440 or 4k. The higher your fps, the lower your input lag is, better 1% lows and better .01% lows. Also, the higher resolutions, like 1440 and 4k, do give sharper images but smaller enemy red outlines (easier to see with larger outlines). If winning is more important to you, then these are settings that give you a competitive advantage. If you don't, then you don't have to. But that pc will absolutely not give him stable 540 fps with good 1% lows and .01% lows on 1440 or 4k, although for the price of that pc, it's sad, it doesn't.
@@officialghost1801 I'm pretty sure you can get stable 540 fps on a 4080 Super at 1440p with the settings he already uses, but we are both speculating about that right now. I don't have a GPU like that to test it. The advantage of 540 fps on a game like this is another topic we could discuss, but let's just agree to disagree. I really don't think the difference on fps you get from 1080 to 1440p is a real drawback. I think input lag is not the right term, more like response time. And yes, higher fps makes a difference, but outside of literal ProPlay the difference is not really impactfull. About the smaller red outlines. Are you sure about that? I know it's an argument in Overwatch, but I imagine being game dependant, so maybe Supervive just doesn't have that problem. On top of that, this is not Overwatch, here the visual clarity is something to think about. The enemies are smaller, the map is way more crowded, the view is third person, there are bushes, trees and terrain... When you factor that in having a higher resolution starts to make a lot more sense, even if it would cost you a some fps, especially when we are talking about (what I consider) close to overkill (540 fps). The difference between 540 and something like 480 fps is just not that big for what you get in return, specially in a game where seeing tiny details is really important. (Which item does the enemy have for example).
@dafelix all of your points are valid. Just saying that if you want ever competitive advantage (which this guy does) he's going to focus on stable low input lag (yes input lag) for the smoothest fastest experience which is why he's on 1080p with a 14900k and a 4080. If we click at the same time, I'm going to hit you first. If you go around a corner, I'm going to see you first. I still appreciate visual fidelity in single-player games, but as a competitor, yes, those 60 fps from 480 to 540 absolutely matter. But you can still be a top player on less fps for sure, but it's about what you value. It's not right or wrong . I'm just letting you know why this guy has a 4080 and is still using 1080p and why the pros have 4090 and 9800 x3ds. Every millisecond of information matters to serious competitors. But I still understand why it can be a point to be seen as wastful performance if that's not your main concern. No right or wrong answer for sure
After playing with my new UI changes, I can say that having a bigger map is legit like cheating. It is so nice how much info you can get so fast. Try it out!!!
I wish in the future they would add a setting feature where we can set keybinds for each characters. Kinda how overwatch is with theirs. I only need RMB when using Oath and Hudson for their 1st abilities but im stuck using the keybind generally cause I dont wanna keep on changing binds every game. Using RMB on other hunters is awkward for me.
Great video, Paz. Looking forward to seeing your next upload from you. I hit the thumbs up button on your post. Keep up the awesome work! Your insights on the camera settings were particularly eye-opening. Have you considered how different key bindings might impact new players transitioning from other genres?
thank you
Is it just me or is the game overall reallllly quiet? I feel like my headphones are turned down while I’m playing
Yes I have to blast it and then my discord is super loud and i have to bring it down
I don't know all the characters too well, but im sure ghost does in fact reload and it's relevant since the forst bullets of his magazine deal more dmg
You don't reload with R though. It just goes on its own after not left clicking.
I'm using a azeron cyborg keyboard to play supervive. So much better with movement and abilities
I really dislike WASD Enhance Dash on Shiv. When I was practicing with it, it was throwing me directly towards my target way too often.
Yeah that is like the one character I could see this being a problem on for sure
Playing at 1080p with that high end PC is crazy
@@dafelix why?
@@MuvvLuvv as he said, he has an i9 14900k and a 4080 Super. With a PC like that he could play this game at 4k max settings and still get double the fps of the average person gets at 1080p.
And really, pairing a 4080 Super with a 1080p monitor is just a waste of money. You are paying for a really expensive GPU and never using it fully. A 1440p monitor would make a lot more sense, and you don't have to give up on refresh rate with modern monitors.
@dafelix he won't get 540 constant fps with 1440 or 4k. The higher your fps, the lower your input lag is, better 1% lows and better .01% lows. Also, the higher resolutions, like 1440 and 4k, do give sharper images but smaller enemy red outlines (easier to see with larger outlines). If winning is more important to you, then these are settings that give you a competitive advantage. If you don't, then you don't have to. But that pc will absolutely not give him stable 540 fps with good 1% lows and .01% lows on 1440 or 4k, although for the price of that pc, it's sad, it doesn't.
@@officialghost1801 I'm pretty sure you can get stable 540 fps on a 4080 Super at 1440p with the settings he already uses, but we are both speculating about that right now. I don't have a GPU like that to test it.
The advantage of 540 fps on a game like this is another topic we could discuss, but let's just agree to disagree. I really don't think the difference on fps you get from 1080 to 1440p is a real drawback.
I think input lag is not the right term, more like response time. And yes, higher fps makes a difference, but outside of literal ProPlay the difference is not really impactfull.
About the smaller red outlines. Are you sure about that? I know it's an argument in Overwatch, but I imagine being game dependant, so maybe Supervive just doesn't have that problem.
On top of that, this is not Overwatch, here the visual clarity is something to think about. The enemies are smaller, the map is way more crowded, the view is third person, there are bushes, trees and terrain... When you factor that in having a higher resolution starts to make a lot more sense, even if it would cost you a some fps, especially when we are talking about (what I consider) close to overkill (540 fps). The difference between 540 and something like 480 fps is just not that big for what you get in return, specially in a game where seeing tiny details is really important. (Which item does the enemy have for example).
@dafelix all of your points are valid. Just saying that if you want ever competitive advantage (which this guy does) he's going to focus on stable low input lag (yes input lag) for the smoothest fastest experience which is why he's on 1080p with a 14900k and a 4080. If we click at the same time, I'm going to hit you first. If you go around a corner, I'm going to see you first. I still appreciate visual fidelity in single-player games, but as a competitor, yes, those 60 fps from 480 to 540 absolutely matter. But you can still be a top player on less fps for sure, but it's about what you value. It's not right or wrong . I'm just letting you know why this guy has a 4080 and is still using 1080p and why the pros have 4090 and 9800 x3ds. Every millisecond of information matters to serious competitors. But I still understand why it can be a point to be seen as wastful performance if that's not your main concern.
No right or wrong answer for sure
first comment ig dunno
As soon as this guy said "WAZD" he lost all credibility lol