#25: Analog Oscilloscope bandwidth considerations

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 66

  • @JohnRaschedian
    @JohnRaschedian 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    These videos are better than gold. Going through them one by one again.

  • @TheCrazyStudent
    @TheCrazyStudent 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you very much for replying. This leads to a follow-up question: Ok, so the BW limit can in some cases clean up the signal I see on screen if there is any noise to it. But is this "clean-up" happening pre- or post-triggering? If the high-frequency noise is causing trigger problems (triggering on the noise as well, showing "two" sine waves as lobes on screen), can BW limit help me with that?

  • @JohnRaschedian
    @JohnRaschedian 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Alan! You have great videos on this channel. I'm simply watching them from the very beginning (around 7 years ago). Thank you!

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good luck, there's a lot of them. I hope you enjoy them.

    • @JohnRaschedian
      @JohnRaschedian 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! Those videos are simply perfect!

    • @ronaldwhittaker6327
      @ronaldwhittaker6327 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      yep good guy i don't get just yet but i'm trying.

  • @supertruckertom
    @supertruckertom 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would a 2230 have been able to spot that oscillation? It might not have been able to fully resolve it due to the 100 mhz bandwidth but would the blurred trace be evident? I guess I need to build something similar and find out. Is that something that the choice of test leads could affect as well?

  • @roeion
    @roeion 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice video, but I think, the oscillation has started after you have connected the probe to the base of the transistor. And a little tip: dont use ceramic high capacity capacitors in low frequency circuits. The ceramic is highly non-linear this means it changes its capacity when the voltage above the capacitor changes. This leads to disturbances and additional harmonics in the circuit.

  • @rosshollinger8097
    @rosshollinger8097 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My belief is that there are two equally true statements, not just for bandwidth, but for anything in life. 1. "Buy as much (best, etc) as you can afford." 2. There is no such thing as a starter or beginner anything. Learn on the best you can afford (back to statement 1.) My first scope, a 2467B, was no more difficult to learn on than a 465, or any other. When you don't know anything there are no bad habits to bring to the table.

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A 2467B is a heck of a scope to be your "first" scope! I remember buying them "new" at my first job in the mid/late 80s, and they were over $12,000 due to the special microchannel-plate CRT.

    • @rosshollinger8097
      @rosshollinger8097 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@w2aew Gotta learn on something. I love that scope. I'll never be another you, but in the 8 or 9 months I've had it I've kicked butt in learning it, mostly from watching your videos.

  • @ki4dbk
    @ki4dbk 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now I'm going to spend even more on my new used scope this coming hamfest. Thanks Alan! No seriously, very concise and practical, not to mention tons of fun.

  • @DB3TK
    @DB3TK 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you have to make do with a low bandwidth scope, you can in some cases detect oscillation by holding your finger, a metal tool or a piece of ferrite close to the circuit. If this has any effect on a waveform or or on the supply current of an AF circuit, it is oscillating at RF.

  • @SteveAaron
    @SteveAaron 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Voulu tou mention which transistor you used and what was the voltage you applied to the circuit?

  • @jaak68
    @jaak68 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's always handy to have a Tektronix Application Engineer posting videos! Thanks!!!

  • @bayareapianist
    @bayareapianist 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you use x-y mode to measure the phase shift between two signals? By rate turning per sec you can tell how much those signals differ.

  • @lolilollolilol7773
    @lolilollolilol7773 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Knowledge right there. Learning from the best.

  • @nlimchua
    @nlimchua 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could you do a video of checking capacitors in-circuit using a scope and function gen? This would be very helpful for a lot of viewers and I don't see good video postings anywhere of this topic. thx!

  • @TheCrazyStudent
    @TheCrazyStudent 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for all your awesome oscilloscope videos. A question; In what kind of situation could you actually take advantage of the 20 MHz BW limit button? Why would I ever want to limit the bandwidth on purpose? Why is the button even there? I have a 100 MHz analog Tek scope and would really like to know at what point I can benefit from this function. Thanks.

    • @khangau4844
      @khangau4844 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      10 years later. I think when you wanna filter out high freq unwanted signals above 20MHz like noise spikes and stff, u would want to turn on the 20MHz BW limit. In the video, the signal is only a few KHz of a sinusoidal signal so u wouldnt see any significant difference when turning on 20MHz.

    • @khangau4844
      @khangau4844 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      But u prob know a lot more now than me. I m just a 3rd yr ee student hehe

    • @khangau4844
      @khangau4844 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Usually the higher the better cuz u never know when ur circuit picks up some weird high freq shit

  • @tentis2
    @tentis2 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelent video. It proofs the concept - It is always good to have more bandwidth in the scope than needed. I've bought a Tektronix 2465B a few days ago for less than $500 from eBay. Post more video about scopes, I will watch them with pleasure
    Thank you

  • @321reh
    @321reh 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another Interesting Video that you actually LEARN something from, And it Doesn't hurt that You're a Tektronix Application Engineer!!! Tek Scopes are my Favorite( I own a 2225) Thanks!!!

  • @aortiz557
    @aortiz557 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what an informative video, thank you very much for posting this, gives me more reason to replace my aging 20mhz o-scope.

  • @RadioHamGuy
    @RadioHamGuy 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is very good to know and something most people would not even think about, thanks for posting!

    • @alexandrostzavellas6730
      @alexandrostzavellas6730 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      hello is there any case of making circuit of Gaussian pulse or pulse pair like the DME signal distance measuring equipment?

  • @aneeshprasobhan
    @aneeshprasobhan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    there is almost zero second hand scopes for sale here in South India above 20Mhz.. :(

  • @frankauro0707
    @frankauro0707 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Alan, thanks for your great video!
    I want to buy tek2467 but also see tek2467B in the market. So which one should I choose?
    Because I remember you mentioned 2467 with great CRT display, right?

    • @JohnUsp
      @JohnUsp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      anyone, did you buy it? LOL

  • @gbowne1
    @gbowne1 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it's the batman effect... noted by the shape of the spurious waveform.

  • @cbradiomizfit7562
    @cbradiomizfit7562 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm looking for a analog scope to monitor my 10 meter radio on 11 meter band. What band width scope would i need for 27mhz plus?

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For monitoring the RF envelope, you don't necessarily care about having accurate amplitude measurements, so you can use a scope that has lower BW. A 20 or 25MHz scope would be fine, but a 50 or 100MHz (or greater) would be better.

  • @nihonam
    @nihonam 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, I'm about to realise that tight stiffing circuits on breadboard is wrong idea. It's parallel lines have strong interference and can cause faulty behaviour. Especially on cheap noname boards with uncertain contacts.
    And is it good practice to create virtual screening, separating different circuit junctions one from another with grounded unused lines of breadboard?

  • @Edw590
    @Edw590 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you know how I could increase the bandwidth of an oscilloscope? I might be buying a 15 MHz scope, and I was thinking maybe if I'd want, I could increase its bandwidth. I have the schematics (Telequipment D65), so I thought I could just look on D66 and put all parts different on the D65 and that should increase its bandwidth to 25 Mhz (D66's bandwidth). Or I could go look on some other Telequipment scope and get the parts and put on this one and increase its bandwidth. What do you think?
    PS: I was also told I could be limited too by the CRT. So I guess I could increase it to for example 100 MHz and then let the CRT decide where it could take me. Good or awful idea? haha
    In any case, thank you for the video!

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you compare the service manuals (schematics and PCB layouts), you can determine if they 15MHz version is intentionally BW limited down from 25 or something wider. However, keep in mind that even if you are able to convert it, it would likely need tuning/calibration to be flat over the rated BW.

    • @Edw590
      @Edw590 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@w2aew Thank you for the fast reply. What components do you think that will need replacement if I attempt to do this? Caps, inductors and transistors? (The ones that came to my mind that rely on frequency - in the case of transistors, for the gain.)

  • @takforalt
    @takforalt 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! I learned a lot thanks from an newcomer to oscilloscopes.

  • @yoramstein
    @yoramstein 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The high freq. oscillations are due to the bird wisle at the background.

  • @josealfredobh
    @josealfredobh 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh, how I'd appreciate to see how those signals appear on a 100 Mhz oscilloscope, like Tektronix 465B you've got!

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hmm, I don't have this circuit assembled anymore. I guess that the magnitude of the oscillations will appear lower due to the lower BW. I think that the delayed timebase probably won't have enough brightness to perform this much magnification on the oscillating section.

  • @PeterWalkerHP16c
    @PeterWalkerHP16c 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does that circuit (as drawn) actually work? The link to base from 200k & 10nF looks wrong. I'd swap the link and the 200k about?

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's right - I used to have an annotation in the video that corrected this mistake, but TH-cam eliminated the annotation feature. The schematic is drawn properly in this video:
      th-cam.com/video/IcrnXRbkLpc/w-d-xo.html

  • @TheRogerx3
    @TheRogerx3 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just a noob question (all be it from a 52 year old) I've just bought a 20mhz Hameg 203-7 analog following your video on octopus test circuits and component testing. will it complement my digital 100mhz digital scope that appears to show a lot of noise or is this noise actually real.
    PS shame I can only LIKE your videos once.. : ) I find I pause and or re-watch often.

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, more bandwidth = more noise. Also, analog scopes often hide some noise due to the phosphor response.

  • @indigoskywalker
    @indigoskywalker 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Given that you also own a tds2000 series, is it possible to do the same delayed triggering zoom trick with a tds2000 series?

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can - sort of. In the Horizontal menu of the TDS2000, you'll see you've got a menu on the side that has entries for "Main", "Window Zone" and "Window". If you select "Window Zone", you can adjust the "zoomed region" by using the SEC/DIV knob for the width and the HORIZ POSITION for the delay. Once you've got the desired area indicated by the vertical dashed cursors (using the aforementioned controls), select the "Window" menu item. The display will then show you the zoomed area. You can't get *both* the unzoomed waveform and the zoomed window at the same time.

  • @jonmullins8460
    @jonmullins8460 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    3:06 "I'm Batman"

  • @JohnFHendry
    @JohnFHendry 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great demonstration... and nice scope;-)

  • @tjasont1
    @tjasont1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got a question for you If i was to increase the oscillator frequency range do u think it would increase the at least view able signals in the scope I know the crt and the amplifier have a part to play as well. But perhaps there is a little more in it maybe instead of 5mhz I could get 10 or 8 or 6 for that matter just wondering I have a 500mhz digital scope but just wondering on my old tube CRT scope if I lower the capacitance on the on horizontal oscillator say I add a extra range per say to the wafer switch just wondering?

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably not. The horizontal and vertical amplifiers and CRT drivers will likely not have enough response to extend the frequency range by much.

    • @tjasont1
      @tjasont1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@w2aew Am sure your probably right am sure they squeezed every bit of bandwidth they could out as it is.

  • @ktmrookie
    @ktmrookie 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Okay Mister funnypants, now tell us seriously.. how did you draw Batman (at 3:06) on there? ;-)

  • @StreuB1
    @StreuB1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video Alan. So, is it safe to say that the bandwidth is actually the highest frequency that a scope can effectively measure from zero?
    As always, thank you again for such great videos. They really are fantastic.
    N0BPS

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looks like u found my video describing scope bandwidth and you no know why the answer to this question is no.

    • @StreuB1
      @StreuB1 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +w2aew Indeed!

    • @SDsailor7
      @SDsailor7 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is $200 a reasonable price for a Tektronix 456B? the scope looks in excellent cosmetic condition don't know how it performs. It comes with all the manuals and probes also includes an audio cassette. Is there a way to test it to know that it is in good condition?Can you advice please.Thank you again for very interesting video I am learning a lot.Cheers

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      If it is in exceptional shape with good probes and manuals, then yes. Otherwise, it is a little pricey. Maybe negotiate down closer to $150. Quick checks - make sure both channels work with calibrator and probes, make sure you have a sweep at all horizontal settings, etc. Just run through all of the controls to be sure they do what you expect.

    • @SDsailor7
      @SDsailor7 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you will follow your advice.

  • @Radiowild
    @Radiowild 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great presentation! You brought up a good point which most of of us would never consider when looking for a scope/upgrade. Got any for sale? Remember I'm a cheap ham! Hi! KC2RDU/ RW

  • @sinkosav
    @sinkosav 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    if you don't have oscilloscope,and have spectrum analyzer,one little magnetic loop will do the job finding any kind of oscillation.,even if needed ,preamp can be put on analyzer input...ha ha ha but is more expensive way.

  • @2M0JAS
    @2M0JAS 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative, thanks for posting this.

  • @321reh
    @321reh 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @w2aew My Dream scope would be the Tek 2465...300Mhz B.W. ....More Than Enough!!!

  • @ernestb.2377
    @ernestb.2377 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pure Magic 🙂

  • @paraescucharrap
    @paraescucharrap 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good !!!

  • @QuaaludeCharlie
    @QuaaludeCharlie 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank You for posting ! :) QC