I read the book for assignment purposes and this is the summary of his stance on Muhammad bin Qasim: In A Book of Conquest, Manan Ahmed Asif argues that the figure of Muhammad bin Qasim-at least as he appears in the Chachnama-should be understood less as a one-dimensional conqueror and more as a literary and political exemplar of just governance. Here are the key points of Asif’s perspective: 1. Not Merely a Military Hero: Asif challenges the colonial and nationalist readings that treat Muhammad bin Qasim purely as the victorious “invader” who laid the foundation of Muslim rule in Sindh. Instead, he suggests that the Chachnama portrays Qasim as a ruler whose conquests are only part of a larger moral and political narrative. 2. Embodiment of Ethical Rulership: According to Asif, the text underscores Qasim’s concern for justice, fair treatment of local populations, and willingness to negotiate or accommodate local elites. By highlighting these elements in the Chachnama, Asif shows that its compilers intended to present an idealized image of Qasim as a model ruler who balanced conquest with the ethical responsibilities of governance. 3. A Tool for Political Theory: Asif interprets the Chachnama as functioning much like a “mirror-for-princes” text (i.e., a manual on statecraft), where Qasim’s behavior is less about glorifying warfare and more about illustrating how a ruler should behave in a diverse society. Thus, Qasim is cast as an archetype of enlightened statecraft, serving as a lesson for future rulers confronting multi-religious and multi-ethnic domains. 4. Break with the ‘Conquest-Only’ Lens: By reading Qasim through the Chachnama, Asif moves away from the long-standing historical approach that frames Qasim’s arrival solely in terms of an invasion. He argues instead that the text attempts to legitimize rule through moral authority, consensus-building, and respect for local traditions. 5. Contextualizing in 13th-Century Sindh: Asif also notes that the Chachnama was compiled in 13th-century Sindh-centuries after Qasim’s time-so the portrayal of Qasim reflects the political and social concerns of that later era. Qasim’s character, then, is partly shaped by the needs and worldview of those who preserved and reinterpreted his story. In sum, Manan Ahmed Asif views Muhammad bin Qasim in the Chachnama as a nuanced figure-less the straightforward conqueror of popular historiography, and more a literary vehicle for modeling inclusive governance, moral authority, and justice in a pluralistic region.
Bro it’s very good to listen you that now you under stand that your for father was hindu and your for father was changed his salwar against talwar. Islam is not a religion it’s ideology to kill the other people only for that to follow islamic ideology mohammad him self was lootera and killer just read the books of Ibne hisham and ibne ihisaque. Can you imagine the person who was age of 54 married with 6 year old small girl and married with his own daughter in law and kept so many female slave.
Another important person in our history is Porus. I would never call Alexander as great. He was just a brutal invader. Porus was a son of soil who broke his back and yes he was from our region which is now Pakistan. Just because he was nott Muslim we don't teach about him to our generation. Would love to see TPE explaining what happened in that war too.
@@bituparnabarman-g8g He was called king porus by Greek His real name was Raja Purushottam of Paurav Kingdom in the Punjab region And also Samrat Chandragupt Maurya was not a king when this war took place..Magadh was controlled by King Dhananand.
Fun fact: Mohammad Bin Qasim comes from the Ummayad dynasty, the same Ummayad dynasty that murdered the decedents of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) how can we look up to such figure who was apart of an empire which had Imam Hussain and his family killed?
Ummayad dynasty started building dom like structure which was Sindhi architecture. Sindh architect captured and made their. Sindh known as hind there, there’s many story related to hind there. Hind - The nation with prosperity, divine and huge resources. Everyone’s dream to conquer this fertile land.
@@gurgaonboy69 Show an ancient dome like structure in Sind? 😂😢 The first known evidence of domes dates back to Mesopotamia around 2000 BC, where they were used in palaces and temples. Roman builders discovered the monolithic dome around 100 A.D. by rotating an arch in a circle. They then used this design to cap churches and mosques. Google it for more info.
!! REFORMING THE IDEOLOGY OF ISLAMIC JIHAD FROM THE EARLY CHILDHOOD IS THE ONLY SOLUTION TO RADICALISM, WHICH IS BORN OF SUPERSTITIOUS BRAINWASH ONLY!!!!!! Respected Sir/Ma'am, Kindly go through this message which certainly contains a very practical and realistic method on how to eradicate or rather neutralize the conception of terrorism from the very ideological or grass root level. The most barbaric and superstitious practice known as TERRORISM or JIHAD is fed into the Muslim population from the very childhood. The constant and consistent hearing and chanting of the message - “There is no other GOD but ALAH and everybody else is punishable and condemnable by GOD and shall burn in hell for eternity. All religions except ISLAM are bogus and creation of the Satan. Thus, the followers are condemnable by death, conversion and brutal punishments.” This fashions and moulds a child’s subconscious mind and dedicate/initiates them for the cause of jihad. The environment, where parents, religious teachers, society, and everybody around who are supposed to be guardians of an innocent child - praise, glorify, sympathise, support and are willing to take part in the so-called struggle directly or indirectly to bring ISLAMIC Kingdom or CALIFATE. This so-called holy war or struggle for ISLAM is known as JIHAD and is recommended to every Muslim to attain the highest reward in their spiritual kingdom. Those who sacrifice their lives in such struggles are perceived as martyrs and heroes and are greatly celebrated and become exemplary for every Muslim out there. The religious leaders on whom the common Muslim have blind faith on, propagate that, there is no scope of reform or any kind of rational or logical improvement in the religion and any such attempts are punishable by brutal execution. The words of Mohammad, Quran are heavenly and eternally perfect, such is their belief and this ideology stems from the belief that this material life is only an illusion and temporary, and which should be gloriously sacrificed for the cause of Islam, and Allah shall grant a life of eternal enjoyment in the heaven with 72 enchanting virgins which is the true purpose of this human. Such illogical and brainwashed Muslim families who prioritise religion over everything else encourage each other to beget as many kids to increase the Muslim population at an alarming pace and capture the politics of the country by vote or sheer strength of population to which the democratic countries are much vulnerable. A JIHAD and JANNAT programmed child will only use his/her modern education and all types of the modern advantages that he/she has, for the advancement of the religious cause. And we have seen all the terrorist organization leaders and much of their supporters are very well educated and financially prosperous people. But the only thing they have in common is that they are mentally programmed from their childhood for JIHAD and JANNAT (HEAVEN). Thus, they have used all of their modern education and possessions for the fulfilment and the execution of the cause. So, it’s only a political lie to justify that only illiterate and poor people are superstitious and go for JIHAD and violence. If that would have been the reality, then why it does not happen in any other religion and why anybody belonging to any other religion commit massacre and mass killing as they do in the name of Islam. And also, we certainly have witnessed many foreign Islamic emperors, kings and invaders were not poor and had no poverty, they came and destroyed, massacred countless civilians who did not belong to their religion and faith. Such actions can never be due to their place of birth or origin but rather a deliberate intention or a persistent propaganda bred into their mind. Therefore, the crux of the matter lies not in wealth, poverty, or education, but rather in the pervasive influence of superstition and the perpetuation of these beliefs instilled in their minds since the very childhood. This, without any doubt, stands as the sole and ultimate cause. They are all brainwashed and indoctrinated from the very childhood by the hardcore, fundamental, and violent prone part of this religion. This is the only thing what they have in common. The religion glorifies the destruction of religious structures and idols, attacks on religious gatherings and places of cultural significance, and unjustly enforces taxes on non-believers, known as "jizya," to discourage adherence to other faiths. Such indoctrination and brainwashing have historically produced ruthless Islamic invaders and rulers whose so-called religious or moral duty is to wreak havoc upon non-Muslims, regardless of whether they are civilians, women, children, or the elderly. Women and children of defeated soldiers are often given the ultimatum to convert to Islam or be turned into sex slaves as rewards for the fighters. The world has endured such atrocities century after century since the dawn of Islam. Notable groups such as ISIS, the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Boko Haram, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and numerous others exemplify this violent ideology. When adherents of such ideologies unite, they can establish Islamic states or caliphates anywhere in the world. Contemporary examples include the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Islamic State Khorasan, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and several African countries, as well as parts of India and Europe, which are severely affected by such ideologies. However, today's global approach to terrorism tends to focus on the secondary and ineffective factors such as mitigating the visible effects, such as attacks and threats and missing out the soul and primary cause of addressing the ideological issue at the first place. If such strategies are not noted and swift actions are not taken by governments, it will only be a matter of years before states, countries, and continents become Islamic caliphates. THE EVOLUTION OF THIS RELIGION AND ITS POTENTIAL DARK FUTURE CAN BE ADDRESSED, AND AN IDEOLOGICAL REFORM CAN BE EASILY BROUGHT ABOUT, IF AND ONLY IF IT IS ADDRESSED FROM THE EARLY CHILDHOOD THROUGH A NONVIOLENT, PEACEFUL, AND LOGICAL APPROACH. BY INTEGRATING COMPREHENSIVE LOGICAL TRAINING FROM EARLY CHILDHOOD THROUGH HIGHER EDUCATION, WE CAN CULTIVATE A SOCIETY WHERE REASON AND LOGIC PREVAIL OVER RELIGION AND EXTREMISM. THE SEED OF EXTREMISM AND FUNDAMENTALISM WILL HAVE NO PLACE IN ANY CHILD’S MIND OR IN SOCIETY; EVERYTHING WILL BE ACCEPTED BASED ON LOGIC ALONE. THE PROPOSAL (ABSOLUTE SOLUTION): - • A LOGIC CLASS OR PERIOD (twice a week) - WITH RELIGIOUS LEADERS OR SCHOLARS OF DIFFERENT COMMUNITY. THERE SHOULD BE A PANEL INCLUDING SCIENTISTS, GURUS, THINKERS, PSYCHIATRISTS, POLITICAL LEADERS, FEMINISTS, LAWERS, VICTIMS OF TERRORISM, JOURNALISTS, ATHEISTS, ETC. WHO CAN REASONABLY AND PRACTICALLY EXPLAIN MATTERS. EVERY INDIVISUAL WOULD BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN THEIR RELIGIOUS TEACHINGS AND PROBLEMS in their religion. THE SCIENTISTS, ATHEISTS, FEMINISTS, PSYCHIATRISTS ALONG WITH ALL THE STUDENTS SHOULD HAVE A DEBATE TO QUESTION EVERYTHING ABOUT RELIGION INCLUDING ITS MERITS AND DEMERITS. • And the debate should also focus, about how certain religions provoke the human tendency of addiction to heartrate, revenge, enjoying others brutal suffering, social segregation etc. The debate could be done over video conference; however, a physical debate is far effective. This debate will have a profound effect and strengthen the logical acceptance of matters in human life and will definitely open up their minds for every other religion and faith. • The scientists, psychiatrists, atheists, feminists etc. will give them a practical and realistic understanding of life. They will have question answers back and forth including students. They will be educated properly about superstition and brainwashing and never fall for it. • This should be implemented from the very beginning of the educational system to the end (Kindergarten, Primary School, High School, College, University etc.) to ideologically defeat terrorism at places especially of Muslim population in every country, town and village. • Please consider this message and implement it as soon as possible to destroy the seed of terrorism. This anti extremism formula is INDISPENSABLE, INDISPENSABLE and INDISPENSABLE for all types of religious and cultural issues around the world.
@@talha2024 still better than lotera qasim...and if both are weighted I would surely go with dahir...qasim aur baaki lotere doodh ke dhule nahi the...sab lotere aurton ke sang weheshipan kia tha...dusro ki biwi aur baaki aurton ke saath
That's the difference between India and Pakistan. Pakistan is a case study where everything is wrong with a country and a nation. Right from its formation.
@@ThePakistanExperiencetum itna batao ki india me ladies Johar kyo start Kiya.kya Muslim me male ganimat nahi hota,kya islam me loudi nahi hai.total concept jihadi Mohammed ne diya tha.9 sal ki aisa jihadi Mohammed ko mature kaise laga,360 boot todke kaba kabzaya.jihadi Mohammed was first terrorist on earth. Support ex Muslim adam seeker urdu Pakistan ❤from bihar
Tum batao ki kis hindu king ne male ganimat loota,loundi banwaya,uske dar se ladies ne Johar kiya.jihadi Mohammed ne male ganimat,boot todna,loundi banana.yeh sab to jihadi Mohammed ne halal kiya tha.
puri ankh to kabhi nhi khulegi kyuki inko hindutva se bhi problem h jabki usko counter karne ke liye kaise stupid points diye janab ne, ek tarah se hinduo pe hue zulm ko chupana hi h. kisi hindutva influencer se debate kar le facts pe 10 min bhi tik nhi payege.
@saumyapandey-zr7jd Hindutva is world's biggest minority the whole world have rejected that idea and keep that as minority.. in whole world this minority is cornered to only one country so there is no point doing any debate to such minority...
It took courage to say that....systematic Islam only can blind people and it did since 1400 years...but there are few people who understands their conscience and stand by it...and being a muslim it takes too much courage to say your mind...you are real brave people...cause in our culture we can say whatever our mind is..but it takes too much courage to tell your mind in islam it is very distant from truth..and muslim can't tolerate truth..I mean muslim who believes in quran..most courageous person I know is the person who said.."anal haq" in islam
@@viratrajpandey3346bro wtf did you just said ? If you can't speak good than stay quiet. We got the information from the video and accepted the truth no one needs your support. Fix yourselves and don't ruin our image .
@@rajendrawandhare9114 not All though , Punjabis and Sindhis are .we are happy that we converted , not going to face discrimination just because born to a lower caste person, not going to be unhygienic, not going to spend my life hating a particular religion. Truth is that every Muslim is converted or reverted for us. Since even Arabs were idol worshipers , they used to have same rituals that Hindus have , burring daughter alive, same nonsense playing with fire , dancing . Giving food to god 😂.a converted has more value in islam than a non converted , since they faced the hardship to leave their ancestorial religion and break apart from their culture and family. And I and all Pakistanis are not converted since we were born to Muslims.
lol, India is just as horrible, not really the vishaw guru modi has us all believing, not morally, economically, militarily, Pakistan is not much worse than India at the moment. Sab changa nayi si.
@@shames-ulhaq4296India is going to become 3rd largest economy by 2028 end and military power too. Learn to accept reality and shun the leftist mindset.
@@shames-ulhaq4296 lol, think about pakistan which has the most number of prescribed terrorist organisations in the world and survives on begging and aid from all over the world whereas India slowly gradually progresses on its own mitigating challenges and hardships. Try to study and analyse before making a F00L of yourself in the public
One Interesting Fact: The 2 most common images used to depict Amar Shaheed Maharaja Dahir of Sindh are the actual images of 2 different Rajas of the Princely States of India during British Rule. 1. Maharaja Ranbir Singh Jamwal (Dogra Ruler) of Jammu and Kashmir. 2. Maharaja Sawai Madho Singh II Rajawat (a Rajput of Kachwaha clan) of the Jaipur Princely State.
Shahzad, you are a gem. I earnestly pray that Allah SWT keeps you under His special protection. The Hasmites came to Sindh to seek refuge from the atrocities of the Umayyad. That is why the Umayyad attacked Sindh.
I agree with everything except your perception about Hindutva. Hindutva is a reaction by Hindus to protect their ways of life. Majority of Muslims in the Indian subcontinent never protested against radical gazwah-e-hind attitude towards Hindus. Like someone said a moderate Muslim is one that doesn’t do jihad towards other religions . .. but also never says anything to stop radical voices in Islam. Hindus have been suffering for centuries…even 70 years after partition, the attitude of Muslim towards Hindus in the subcontinent hasn’t changed. Hindutva is a defensive movement to preserve Hindu way of life, which has been going on for over 5000 years in this part of the world.
Hindustva has nothing to do with Muslims; it has to do with Brahmavad. Muslims are not responsible for the beef ban on north India and forcing lower castes to convert.
Sir, I am an Indian, a hindu, a Brahmin. In that order and hindutva is As dangerous as Islamic radicalism. Your comment proves how dangerous it is! How brain washed hindus are getting and how radicalized hindus are getting! Hinduism is acceptance and tolerance. Hindutva is radicalism!
Mohammad bin Qasim attacked Sindh because King Dahir gave shelter to Prophet Mohammad's family and when Qasim asked Dahir for the family, he refused to give it back and attacked Sindh. Is this true?
@relaxingsound6539 the tomb of famous saint hazrat abdullah shah ghazi r.a. is also in Karachi. He was the great grandson of the Holly prophet. He was also martyred while fighting alone against the soldiers of hajjaj bin yousuf (Allah's curse is upon him)
@@bachoogranger so you are saying that muhammad bin qasim came to sindh just to martyr ahla bait and some how he did not and they not only did tableeg but also florish?? Also i used to thought that the only generation holy prophet had through hazart ali and everyone martyred except hazart zain ul abedin and he also stayed under umayyed. and you did not give me any book reference as i search "the bibi's mazar book" and "grave is in Sindh" on google and i did not get anything
@@Carryminatiroastvx3dw Not alliance it was called the Rajput Confederacy where all the rajput kingdom united to create a single polity and the initiative was taken by Nagbhatt II of Pratihara dynasty in which Bappa Rawal joined
@@saagnickchakraborty7758 kibabh padha kr... Pratihar, Rastrakoot, Gujar ne Rajput ke sath alliance banaya tha.. Nagbhatt ise lead kr rahe the...une hi Al-Junyad ko mara tha...bad me unne Kannauj pr attack kiya vaha pr Nagbhatt vs Dharampal ke beech badi War hui thi jisme Nagbhatt ne Magadha ki 50k celvery ko defeat kiya tha.. Jab padha na ho to likha mat kiya karo..
10:00 no, not everything is a Binary Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj had many Muslim commanders in his Army Merit should be recognised , irrespective of person's background
Similar to Tippu Sultan story that he loved Bharat and he’s a nationalist. Bullshit he was a tyrant who had one goal of ethnic genocide and cleansing in name of Islam
@@ravindraparmar96 but sir in india it's diff. Even if they come from outside. They are more bharatiya than any Indian. All mughals are loving people who came and peacefully integrated into hindu culture. That's what our books say. They aren't wrong but it's the hindy resistance that was considered as violent instead of freedom movement. I agree Haider was adopted and later he killed the vadiyars to become sultan.
Indians have always defended every son of the soil hero...whether he was born in pakistan or either india...also from whatever religion he was either sikh(eg.Ranjeet singh),muslim(Tipu sultan),hindu...
@owaissheraz except some bjp ideologists no one says wrong about tipu...the majority opinion of indians is still the same as of tipu,ranjeet Singh and others...our books also don't treat tipu as a traitor...but as a hero
@@owaissherazwe talk about both good and bad. We don't believe in hero worship like you do with jinnah. It's unfair to show only good and not the bad things. We're not blind now.
Jis Tarah Sindh ke hero raja dahir hen..isi Tarah Punjab ke hero maharaja Ranjit Singh,Hari Singh nalwa, shaheed Bhagat Singh Sandhu aur Rai Ahmed Khan kharal Hain Jo ke isi dharti ke betey hen ❤ naa ke ghaznawi abdali hen Awais Sandhu
If you go deep down further then you will have lots of questions and criticism about entire islamic history including the character of prophet muhammad.
Maine B Jab Engineer Sb se M Bin Qasim ki Story Suni thi Tab se Reality ka Pata chala tha. You explained in more detail today. Your videos have increased my knowledge a lot. ❤
Shehzad, please make a series about our heroes and freedom fighters from this region, including Sindhis like Hemu Kalani and Punjabis like Bhagat Singh. As you already made a video on Rai Ahmed Kharal, please create a list of our true heroes 🙏
If you ask as a Pakistani, then the answer is Muhammad Bin Qasim. If you ask as a descendant of the civilisation that is as old as 5000 years. Then Raja Dahir as he was a local king who died defending his country. Now don't confuse Pakistan with Islam. Pakistan as a concept came into existence when foreign invaders who happened to be Muslims wanted locals be to loyal. What better way than to convert locals to your civilisation. They taught them to hate their own ancestors. Take up Arab names and culture. Now don't say it was Muslim culture. Because it wasn't. Turks, Arabs, Slavs, South East Asians all converted to Islam but maintained their ethnic identity. Only in Sub Continent the locals were converted culturally to hate their own ancestors..
@@ThePakistanExperience Pakistan se koi taluk nehi he ji.. just Hindu hatred me Pakistani bol jaate he Ki Bahar se aye hue Lootero ko apna hero . Ye ap bhi jante ho apke dil ke andar ..
@@ThePakistanExperience One of the wives of imam Hussein R. A was Sindhi Named Bibi shahr banu Tu kuch unconfirmed stories mei Unhoon nei maswara kiya kei bache kuche ahle bait Sindh mei refuge lei lein This is another counter theory to pak studies Arab conquest narrative
The white man colonized our minds-- divided us,ruled over us, used religion to sow discord. It's colonial,imperial, racist bullshit. All of it. There is power and short term success in these tactics, therefore it sticks, for decades, even centuries. We need to decolonise our minds. No one touched by the "superior" white man is unaffected (before the Indians start claiming to be better than everyone else).
Another narrative I read is. - Bin Qasim lays a siege around the capital of Raja Dahir. Even after a year, he fails to breach the fort. Theirs is an understanding amongst the Sindhi troops that if a white flag is hoisted on top of the temple on the hill, they will surrender. At the end of the year, Bin Qasim is ready to call it quits. Apparently a Brahmin minister of Raja Dahir put up a white flag in the middle of the night. Next morning, the doors of the fort were opened. This is one of many stories of treachery by Indians against their own kings. The same goes on with Mir Jaffer and Mir Sadiq.
Indians are not aware of Kasim or Raja Dahir. Although IMHO we are taught about pretty neutral history of 5000+ years which covers almost all major kings of 'India' , Ashok, Chandragupta, Mughals, Tipu Sultan , Shivaji Maharaj , British and the revolutionaries -1857-1947(both violent and non-violent ones). Then students learn ours heroes and villains both come from all religions. No fake history. Just what happened.
😂😂😂.Pakistani people aren’t Indian. Indian word is mostly used by Western colonizer. Islam is first identity of Pakistan. There is nothing glorious than Islam and Allah. God is older than your kings.
Indian Hindu even forgot about Sikh empire and Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Who ruled in PANJAB, Gilgit and parts of Tibet and shared border with China, instead of his statue, Hindus erected Shiva Ji statute near China border.
Ranjit singh had nothing to do with Ladakh. Hindu Dogra General Zorawar Singh conquered Ladakh. Statue of Shivaji Maharaj was erected by Men from Maratha Regiment who revere Shivaji Maharaj. Apni whatsapp university se bahr aaja. Maharaja Ranjit Singh ki koi ijjat nhi krta tere Pakistan mei
indian hindu didn't forget mahraja ranjit singh we have various statues of him and even chapters about him in history books, maratha also ruled pan india. and shivaji statue is celebartion of spirit of 'hindvi swaraj' that he gave to fight the mughal empire. your comments tells the ignorance of pakistani people. we don't teach fake history in our schools and nor we choose hero on basis of religion.
6:10 Just a correction here, in those days it wasn't uncommon for 17 years olds to be leading armies. Childhood is a very recent concept where you are a child one day, and after the clock strikes 12 you're magically an adult. None the less, Hajjaj bin Yusuf was indeed a very controversial person in history, and we should definitely learn about the life of the Prophet (pbuh) before taking such people as heroes.
My ancestors were from Indus Valley and later migrated with the king who founded Bahawalpur.I am so happy that now so many Pakistani are exploring the history.
Ajif ajakia maybe right on this, lekin he ain't some Indian to advise Indians to whether support modi or not, he has no right to interfere in our internal affairs
Photographs of Ranbir Singh and Raja Madhu Singh II have been mistakenly attributed to Raja Dahar. Kindly refrain from using unverified or unauthentic images.
When people change their religion they change their cultural tradition, language, ideology, their role model, heroes, etc Indian subcontinent Muslims are best example of it
It is also said that members of prophet Mohammed’s family took refuge in Sindh after the martyrdom of Hussain. And, the caliph didn’t want any descendant of the prophet to claim the caliphate. I personally think this to be a valid narrative because the consequences of a living descendant of the prophet would pose such a huge threat to the caliphs. There’s even a sect of Punjabis who fought with/for Hussain. To date, they are called Hussaini Brahmins. Bollywood actor Guru Dutt belonged to that community. Sanjay Dutt is his son. Why would any Arab caliph pay so much attention to the remote region of Sindh if his political opponents had not sought refuge there?
The accusation that Muhammad bin Qasim “attacked the Prophet’s family” stems from: • His loyalty to Hajjaj bin Yusuf and the Umayyads, who suppressed revolts by Ahl al-Bayt supporters. • His participation in campaigns against regions and groups that sometimes included Ahl al-Bayt loyalists. However, there is no direct historical evidence of Muhammad bin Qasim personally attacking or targeting the Prophet’s family. His military campaigns in Sindh were part of the Umayyad empire’s expansion, rather than a direct assault on Ahl al-Bayt. Broader Context 1. Umayyad Oppression of Ahl al-Bayt: • The Umayyads are widely criticized in Islamic history for their persecution of the Prophet’s family and their followers. • Hajjaj bin Yusuf, in particular, played a significant role in suppressing Ahl al-Bayt loyalists in Iraq and the Hejaz. 2. Reevaluation of Muhammad bin Qasim: • Muhammad bin Qasim is largely remembered for his conquest of Sindh and the establishment of Islamic rule in the region. • His legacy is seen more as a military and administrative figure rather than a political player in the conflicts between the Umayyads and Ahl al-Bayt. Conclusion The claim that Muhammad bin Qasim attacked the Prophet Muhammad’s family is more likely tied to his association with the Umayyad administration and its broader actions against Ahl al-Bayt loyalists. However, there is no conclusive historical evidence to suggest that he personally targeted the family of the Prophet. His primary role was as a general tasked with expanding the empire in the east.
If Afghanistan is now being portrayed as an enemy country, then the names of Pakistani missiles like "Abdali," "Ghauri," and "Ghaznavi" should be replaced with the names of heroes from Sindh, Balochistan, Punjab, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa who defended this land against foreign invaders. The "geniuses" in our security establishment don’t seem to realize that the Afghan figures they glorified as heroes out of hatred for Hindus and enmity with India-because they massacred Hindus-also massacred millions of Muslims. These figures (like Abdali, Ghauri, and Ghaznavi) were merely invaders and plunderers who did not distinguish between Hindus and Muslims. If the security establishment does not make such changes, then this "new enemy" (Afghanistan) will also appear to be just another political game. Pakistan doesn’t need wars; it needs peace and good neighborly relations with all its neighbors. Promoting a war frenzy is not patriotism.
Ghurids and Ghaznavids weren't afghans. Pashtuns aren't native to the region of KPK, the natives of the region are Indo-Aryan Chitralis, hindkowans similarly the balochis are not native to the region of Balochistan, both pashtuns and balochis migrated and settled here during the Turko-Mongol invasions of the Indian Subcontinent
Can Someone just think Why there is Bamiyan Buddha statue engraved in Stone In Afganistan.In fact lord Buddha who was Youvraj of Hindu Raja,Started Buddha religion and one time Whole Area from Afganistan to Myanmar Became BUDDIST,afterwards AadiShankararaya who originated from Kerala Held debate with Various Kingdoms who were Buddhist & Convinced them to become Hindus .So this land was & is land of HINNDUS
Baloch have lived in Balochistan for thousands of years, with roots in the ancient Mehergarh civilization. The claim about migration from Syria is misquoted recorded history shows only a small group of Baloch went to fight there and returned to Makran. Baloch are natives of this land, and parts of present-day Punjab were historically part of Balochistan. Baloch are one of the oldest nations, with a history deeply rooted in this region.
The Baloch have fought invaders throughout history: 1. Achaemenid Persians - Resisted by Baloch tribes. 2. Alexander the Great - Resisted by Baloch tribes in Makran. 3. Sassanid Persians - Resisted by Baloch tribes. 4. Arab Invaders (Umayyads, Abbasids) - Resisted by Mir Jalal Khan and his people. 5. Turks (Seljuks, Ghaznavids) - Resisted by Baloch tribes. 6. Persian Safavids - Fought by Naseer Khan Noori. 7. Portuguese - Fought by Mir Hammal Kalmati. 8. Mughal Empire - Resisted by Mir Chakar Khan Rind. 9. Afghan Durranis - Resisted by Naseer Khan Noori. 10. British Empire - Fought by Mir Mehrab Khan and Mir Dost Muhammad Khan Barakzai. 11. Pakistani Government - Resisted by Sardar Nauroz Khan, Nawab Akbar Bugti, and Balaach Marri many others. The Baloch have a long history of courage, protecting their land and identity.
Finally a video of yours I watched from beginning to end in a long while. Only criticism I have is that background music was way too damn loud (and honestly quite unnecessary) but otherwise the presentation was on point and factual. Thanks for doing a great job in exposing the real history of these Arab conquerors.
Awesome content Shehzad bhai! 🙌 You tackle each untrue things with true facts and we love to see you putting up so much good work! Love and wishes from 🇮🇳
@Popularfuzzyking-t1z the destruction of hindu temple and their persecution which these pakistanis call political not religious . book is " hindu temples what happened to them" by sita ram goel . with full list of hindu temples that was destroyed by islamic invaders almost 40,000 and several build mosque upon them to humiliate hindus.
Pakistan should either have a democracy like India with real power with elected leaders. Or no democracy and power with Army like UAE, China etc But either ways power and accountability should go hand in hand. Right now Army has all the power and zero accountability to the aawam.
Muslim bhioo 3 mahine pahele Syed Muzammil Sahab ne ek video banaye thi yahe topic pe tab Amir Haq ne refute Kiya tha. Un k claim Ku. Awaz e haq (TH-cam channel) pe. Aap ja k waha b ek Baar dhak sakty.. aap Ku saari BAAT bahetar tareeqe se samj Mai Aaye ge.. insha'Allah
Awesome video bro, very insightful. Not sure if u going to see this comment. But if u ever ever ever come to New Zealand, Auckland, I would love to host u bro. Dare I say, we have better biryani than India and Pakistan in Auckland 😊, best wishes and keep up the good work. Love the ending of the video when u say “padho” .
Great presentation. You have the courage to speak the truth. Hope more people in Pak learn history like you. Hope some fine day this great land and its people unite again.
It’s essential to approach history with objectivity and context rather than emotional or political biases. Muhammad bin Qasim was a pivotal figure in the subcontinent's history, bringing advancements in governance, religious tolerance, and cultural integration during his time in Sindh. His administration laid the foundation for centuries of Islamic influence that shaped the region’s identity, art, and scholarship. While Raja Dahir's resistance is part of our history, glorifying him at the expense of undermining historical facts about Muhammad bin Qasim disregards the larger picture of historical evolution and progress. Both figures represent different eras and ideologies, but dismissing one to elevate the other is neither intellectually honest nor constructive. History should unite us through understanding, not divide us through selective interpretations. Let us respect all contributions to our heritage without compromising on historical accuracy.
The history is simple one is a local defender The other is foreign invader. If someone comes to loot your house now whatever the reason is, he is the villain.
Your words are very diplomatic...i am sorry but a foreign invader is always a villain for the locals ...it's like praising British for looting India ...you have absolutely no dignity and respect for your Land ..no doubt Pakistan is in such big trouble...
@@ssidhu8327If you are denying his roles in freedom. You are ignorant of history. He made few wrong decisions too. But there is no need to compare him to the Qasim narrative of Pakistan. Read about Gandhi, almost blasphemous. Read about Gandhi, he will definitely earn your respect.
There was no caliph of Baghdad, Baghdad was founded much later during the time of abbasids. Umayyad Caliph was in Damascus, that was the capital at the time.
@@ThePakistanExperience It seems the writer likely referred to the Governor of Iraq rather than the Caliph of Baghdad, as Baghdad had not yet been founded during that time. The reigning Caliph was Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, based in Damascus, the capital of the Umayyad Caliphate. At that time, the main administrative centers in Iraq were Kufa, Basra, and Wasit-the latter being a city founded by Al-Hajjaj himself. Al-Hajjaj served as the Governor of Iraq, playing a pivotal role in maintaining Umayyad authority in the region. I truly appreciate the content you’ve shared!
Kitna bhi jhoot bola gaya wo ek din bahar nikal hi aata hai...Ab bhi sudhar jao, tum converted ho... Tumhare baap-dada Hindu the,hai aur rahenge... Jai Shree Ram
I read the book for assignment purposes and this is the summary of his stance on Muhammad bin Qasim:
In A Book of Conquest, Manan Ahmed Asif argues that the figure of Muhammad bin Qasim-at least as he appears in the Chachnama-should be understood less as a one-dimensional conqueror and more as a literary and political exemplar of just governance. Here are the key points of Asif’s perspective:
1. Not Merely a Military Hero:
Asif challenges the colonial and nationalist readings that treat Muhammad bin Qasim purely as the victorious “invader” who laid the foundation of Muslim rule in Sindh. Instead, he suggests that the Chachnama portrays Qasim as a ruler whose conquests are only part of a larger moral and political narrative.
2. Embodiment of Ethical Rulership:
According to Asif, the text underscores Qasim’s concern for justice, fair treatment of local populations, and willingness to negotiate or accommodate local elites.
By highlighting these elements in the Chachnama, Asif shows that its compilers intended to present an idealized image of Qasim as a model ruler who balanced conquest with the ethical responsibilities of governance.
3. A Tool for Political Theory:
Asif interprets the Chachnama as functioning much like a “mirror-for-princes” text (i.e., a manual on statecraft), where Qasim’s behavior is less about glorifying warfare and more about illustrating how a ruler should behave in a diverse society.
Thus, Qasim is cast as an archetype of enlightened statecraft, serving as a lesson for future rulers confronting multi-religious and multi-ethnic domains.
4. Break with the ‘Conquest-Only’ Lens:
By reading Qasim through the Chachnama, Asif moves away from the long-standing historical approach that frames Qasim’s arrival solely in terms of an invasion. He argues instead that the text attempts to legitimize rule through moral authority, consensus-building, and respect for local traditions.
5. Contextualizing in 13th-Century Sindh:
Asif also notes that the Chachnama was compiled in 13th-century Sindh-centuries after Qasim’s time-so the portrayal of Qasim reflects the political and social concerns of that later era. Qasim’s character, then, is partly shaped by the needs and worldview of those who preserved and reinterpreted his story.
In sum, Manan Ahmed Asif views Muhammad bin Qasim in the Chachnama as a nuanced figure-less the straightforward conqueror of popular historiography, and more a literary vehicle for modeling inclusive governance, moral authority, and justice in a pluralistic region.
Wah
ChatGPT ZIndabad
@@gmaingforfun Last point is the most enlightening one
Wah wah wah@@ThePakistanExperience
Bro it’s very good to listen you that now you under stand that your for father was hindu and your for father was changed his salwar against talwar. Islam is not a religion it’s ideology to kill the other people only for that to follow islamic ideology mohammad him self was lootera and killer just read the books of Ibne hisham and ibne ihisaque. Can you imagine the person who was age of 54 married with 6 year old small girl and married with his own daughter in law and kept so many female slave.
Another important person in our history is Porus. I would never call Alexander as great. He was just a brutal invader. Porus was a son of soil who broke his back and yes he was from our region which is now Pakistan. Just because he was nott Muslim we don't teach about him to our generation. Would love to see TPE explaining what happened in that war too.
Yes
Gas spreading poison agenda.
@bituparnabarman-g8g magadh king of that time was dhanananda not chandragupta.
@@bituparnabarman-g8g He was called king porus by Greek His real name was Raja Purushottam of Paurav Kingdom in the Punjab region And also Samrat Chandragupt Maurya was not a king when this war took place..Magadh was controlled by King Dhananand.
We Indians has tought in our cylabas regarding Dahir & Poras
As hindu, our hero is a muslim person known as Apj abdul kalam. But a muslim can never have a hindu as his hero.
No
Ranjit Singh from Punjab
Sir Ganga Ram from Lahore
Bhagat Singh from Lahore
Raja Dahir from Sindh
All of them are our real heroes.
@@NiazHJafri May be u are the only one.......
@@NiazHJafri No they are our heros, not yours. Your heros are MB qasim, Babur, Gazni etc invaders and looters. Please dont make our heros your own.
President is only President no hindu no Muslims Indian President
Why should we have them as our heroes? Like we appreciate the good work they did but they'll never be our heroes
Bin Qasim riding a horse with a Pakistani flag and wearing Shalwar Qamiz had me dying. 🤣🤣🤣
😂
😂😂😂
:) you leave me in splits
😂🤣😄😀😀 Indians Hindu mythical stories main bhi aisa hi projections karthe hain…….
@@AM-jr9lgbeta Hamare 😂 yahan god Flag pakad kar ghode per nhi jate 😂😂
as a Sindhi i grew up learning this history, however, your nuance take taught me so much. I'm loving this series. you're on a roll Gias.
🙌
❤
Guess you meant nuance & not “nuisance” 😊
@@deepakrao5317 yup, thanks i corrected it.
thank god someone has the audacity to speak truth god bless you shezad
No it's half Truth
He is also speaking false things
@@ShahabuddinKhan-w8p Yes because he is speaking without any propaganda
@@deepanshurawat4824 propoganda only done by Right-wing people
Je Sach nahin bol raha balki bade pyar se makhan laga kar hamare saamne rakh raha hai
@@ShahabuddinKhan-w8pgood reply.aise logo ko hi target karne ke Liya je Pakistani aise vlog banate hai.
Fun fact: Mohammad Bin Qasim comes from the Ummayad dynasty, the same Ummayad dynasty that murdered the decedents of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) how can we look up to such figure who was apart of an empire which had Imam Hussain and his family killed?
Ummayad dynasty started building dom like structure which was Sindhi architecture. Sindh architect captured and made their. Sindh known as hind there, there’s many story related to hind there. Hind - The nation with prosperity, divine and huge resources. Everyone’s dream to conquer this fertile land.
@@gurgaonboy69
Show an ancient dome like structure in Sind?
😂😢
The first known evidence of domes dates back to Mesopotamia around 2000 BC, where they were used in palaces and temples. Roman builders discovered the monolithic dome around 100 A.D. by rotating an arch in a circle. They then used this design to cap churches and mosques.
Google it for more info.
!! REFORMING THE IDEOLOGY OF ISLAMIC JIHAD FROM THE EARLY CHILDHOOD IS THE ONLY SOLUTION TO RADICALISM, WHICH IS BORN OF SUPERSTITIOUS BRAINWASH ONLY!!!!!!
Respected Sir/Ma'am,
Kindly go through this message which certainly contains a very practical and realistic method on how to eradicate or rather neutralize the conception of terrorism from the very ideological or grass root level.
The most barbaric and superstitious practice known as TERRORISM or JIHAD is fed into the Muslim population from the very childhood. The constant and consistent hearing and chanting of the message -
“There is no other GOD but ALAH and everybody else is punishable and condemnable by GOD and shall burn in hell for eternity. All religions except ISLAM are bogus and creation of the Satan. Thus, the followers are condemnable by death, conversion and brutal punishments.” This fashions and moulds a child’s subconscious mind and dedicate/initiates them for the cause of jihad.
The environment, where parents, religious teachers, society, and everybody around who are supposed to be guardians of an innocent child - praise, glorify, sympathise, support and are willing to take part in the so-called struggle directly or indirectly to bring ISLAMIC Kingdom or CALIFATE. This so-called holy war or struggle for ISLAM is known as JIHAD and is recommended to every Muslim to attain the highest reward in their spiritual kingdom. Those who sacrifice their lives in such struggles are perceived as martyrs and heroes and are greatly celebrated and become exemplary for every Muslim out there.
The religious leaders on whom the common Muslim have blind faith on, propagate that, there is no scope of reform or any kind of rational or logical improvement in the religion and any such attempts are punishable by brutal execution. The words of Mohammad, Quran are heavenly and eternally perfect, such is their belief and this ideology stems from the belief that this material life is only an illusion and temporary, and which should be gloriously sacrificed for the cause of Islam, and Allah shall grant a life of eternal enjoyment in the heaven with 72 enchanting virgins which is the true purpose of this human.
Such illogical and brainwashed Muslim families who prioritise religion over everything else encourage each other to beget as many kids to increase the Muslim population at an alarming pace and capture the politics of the country by vote or sheer strength of population to which the democratic countries are much vulnerable.
A JIHAD and JANNAT programmed child will only use his/her modern education and all types of
the modern advantages that he/she has, for the advancement of the religious cause. And we have seen
all the terrorist organization leaders and much of their supporters are very well educated and financially prosperous people. But the only thing they have in common is that they are mentally programmed from their childhood for JIHAD and JANNAT (HEAVEN).
Thus, they have used all of their modern education and possessions for the fulfilment and the
execution of the cause. So, it’s only a political lie to justify that only illiterate and poor people are superstitious and go for JIHAD and violence. If that would have been the reality, then why it does not happen in any other religion and why anybody belonging to any other religion commit massacre and mass killing as they do in the name of Islam.
And also, we certainly have witnessed many foreign Islamic emperors, kings and invaders were not poor and had no poverty, they came and destroyed, massacred countless civilians who did not belong to their religion and faith. Such actions can never be due to their place of birth or origin but rather a deliberate intention or a persistent propaganda bred into their mind.
Therefore, the crux of the matter lies not in wealth, poverty, or education, but rather in the pervasive influence of superstition and the perpetuation of these beliefs instilled in their minds since the very childhood. This, without any doubt, stands as the sole and ultimate cause. They are all brainwashed and indoctrinated from the very childhood by the hardcore, fundamental, and violent prone part of this religion. This is the only thing what they have in common.
The religion glorifies the destruction of religious structures and idols, attacks on religious gatherings and places of cultural significance, and unjustly enforces taxes on non-believers, known as "jizya," to discourage adherence to other faiths. Such indoctrination and brainwashing have historically produced ruthless Islamic invaders and rulers whose so-called religious or moral duty is to wreak havoc upon non-Muslims, regardless of whether they are civilians, women, children, or the elderly. Women and children of defeated soldiers are often given the ultimatum to convert to Islam or be turned into sex slaves as rewards for the fighters. The world has endured such atrocities century after century since the dawn of Islam. Notable groups such as ISIS, the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Boko Haram, Jaish-e-Mohammed, and numerous others exemplify this violent ideology. When adherents of such ideologies unite, they can establish Islamic states or caliphates anywhere in the world. Contemporary examples include the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Islamic State Khorasan, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and several African countries, as well as parts of India and Europe, which are severely affected by such ideologies. However, today's global approach to terrorism tends to focus on the secondary and ineffective factors such as mitigating the visible effects, such as attacks and threats and missing out the soul and primary cause of addressing the ideological issue at the first place.
If such strategies are not noted and swift actions are not taken by governments, it will only be a matter of years before states, countries, and continents become Islamic caliphates.
THE EVOLUTION OF THIS RELIGION AND ITS POTENTIAL DARK FUTURE CAN BE ADDRESSED, AND AN IDEOLOGICAL REFORM CAN BE EASILY BROUGHT ABOUT, IF AND ONLY IF IT IS ADDRESSED FROM THE EARLY CHILDHOOD THROUGH A NONVIOLENT, PEACEFUL, AND LOGICAL APPROACH. BY INTEGRATING COMPREHENSIVE LOGICAL TRAINING FROM EARLY CHILDHOOD THROUGH HIGHER EDUCATION, WE CAN CULTIVATE A SOCIETY WHERE REASON AND LOGIC PREVAIL OVER RELIGION AND EXTREMISM. THE SEED OF EXTREMISM AND FUNDAMENTALISM WILL HAVE NO PLACE IN ANY CHILD’S MIND OR IN SOCIETY; EVERYTHING WILL BE ACCEPTED BASED ON LOGIC ALONE.
THE PROPOSAL (ABSOLUTE SOLUTION): -
• A LOGIC CLASS OR PERIOD (twice a week) - WITH RELIGIOUS LEADERS OR SCHOLARS OF DIFFERENT COMMUNITY. THERE SHOULD BE A PANEL INCLUDING SCIENTISTS, GURUS, THINKERS, PSYCHIATRISTS, POLITICAL LEADERS, FEMINISTS, LAWERS, VICTIMS OF TERRORISM, JOURNALISTS, ATHEISTS, ETC. WHO CAN REASONABLY AND PRACTICALLY EXPLAIN MATTERS. EVERY INDIVISUAL WOULD BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN THEIR RELIGIOUS TEACHINGS AND PROBLEMS in their religion. THE SCIENTISTS, ATHEISTS, FEMINISTS, PSYCHIATRISTS ALONG WITH ALL THE STUDENTS SHOULD HAVE A DEBATE TO QUESTION EVERYTHING ABOUT RELIGION INCLUDING ITS MERITS AND DEMERITS.
• And the debate should also focus, about how certain religions provoke the human tendency of addiction to heartrate, revenge, enjoying others brutal suffering, social segregation etc. The debate could be done over video conference; however, a physical debate is far effective. This debate will have a profound effect and strengthen the logical acceptance of matters in human life and will definitely open up their minds for every other religion and faith.
• The scientists, psychiatrists, atheists, feminists etc. will give them a practical and realistic understanding of life. They will have question answers back and forth including students. They will be educated properly about superstition and brainwashing and never fall for it.
• This should be implemented from the very beginning of the educational system to the end (Kindergarten, Primary School, High School, College, University etc.) to ideologically defeat terrorism at places especially of Muslim population in every country, town and village.
• Please consider this message and implement it as soon as possible to destroy the seed of terrorism. This anti extremism formula is INDISPENSABLE, INDISPENSABLE and INDISPENSABLE for all types of religious and cultural issues around the world.
no they didn't kill Prophets family. In fact Persians killed them and put blame on Yazeed.
@@gurgaonboy69
Show any ancient dome in Sindh.
😂
Love to raja dahir...he was a hero whole south asia...love from a sindhi guy from india🇮🇳
❤️
Just read chachnama, and then you will surely expose your hero.
@@talha2024 who wrote chachnama?
@@talha2024 still better than lotera qasim...and if both are weighted I would surely go with dahir...qasim aur baaki lotere doodh ke dhule nahi the...sab lotere aurton ke sang weheshipan kia tha...dusro ki biwi aur baaki aurton ke saath
Our hero was raja dahir
In India we never consider conqueror as our heroes...Just opposite to Pakistan
We consider Godse as a hero 🤡🤡
@@trojanwar760not in textbooks and only few people consider him hero and also first listen to his court speech
@@trojanwar760Godse seved millions of life imagine one more partition by Ghandi
That's the difference between India and Pakistan. Pakistan is a case study where everything is wrong with a country and a nation. Right from its formation.
@@trojanwar760 where is godse considered as hero??
We replaced history with ideology.
Legend
Yes
@@ThePakistanExperiencetum itna batao ki india me ladies Johar kyo start Kiya.kya Muslim me male ganimat nahi hota,kya islam me loudi nahi hai.total concept jihadi Mohammed ne diya tha.9 sal ki aisa jihadi Mohammed ko mature kaise laga,360 boot todke kaba kabzaya.jihadi Mohammed was first terrorist on earth. Support ex Muslim adam seeker urdu Pakistan ❤from bihar
Tum batao ki kis hindu king ne male ganimat loota,loundi banwaya,uske dar se ladies ne Johar kiya.jihadi Mohammed ne male ganimat,boot todna,loundi banana.yeh sab to jihadi Mohammed ne halal kiya tha.
This ideology was imposed on Bengalis which we didn't like @@ThePakistanExperience
I haven't read books of Ayesha Jalal
77 saal lag gaye
aankh Khulte khulte
ptaa nahi ... poori aankh kab Khulegi
lekin end mein
SATYAMEV JAYATE
puri ankh to kabhi nhi khulegi kyuki inko hindutva se bhi problem h jabki usko counter karne ke liye kaise stupid points diye janab ne, ek tarah se hinduo pe hue zulm ko chupana hi h. kisi hindutva influencer se debate kar le facts pe 10 min bhi tik nhi payege.
@saumyapandey-zr7jd Hindutva is world's biggest minority the whole world have rejected that idea and keep that as minority.. in whole world this minority is cornered to only one country so there is no point doing any debate to such minority...
Agreed yrr !! 👍
Same for Punjab !! Ghaznavi was not hero for us ( Punjabi ) , he was just a lootera !! ✍️
Hero of Punjab was Sher e Punjab, Raja Ranjeet Singh
Salute to you 👋
Ghaznawi was also not hero for us ( Indian Punjabi's )
Love from delhi
🙌
He was Hero for us
@@Pashteen_Afghan hero for pashtuns maybe , not for Punjabi my brother 🤗
Watching ur video from canada. Thanku for spreading the truth
🙌
Finally someone spoke about it !!! ❤
❤️
It took courage to say that....systematic Islam only can blind people and it did since 1400 years...but there are few people who understands their conscience and stand by it...and being a muslim it takes too much courage to say your mind...you are real brave people...cause in our culture we can say whatever our mind is..but it takes too much courage to tell your mind in islam it is very distant from truth..and muslim can't tolerate truth..I mean muslim who believes in quran..most courageous person I know is the person who said.."anal haq" in islam
@@viratrajpandey3346bro wtf did you just said ? If you can't speak good than stay quiet. We got the information from the video and accepted the truth no one needs your support. Fix yourselves and don't ruin our image .
Better U aacept that u r converted from Hindus better it will be.Rather apart From Pashtuns and Baloch,all Pakistanis r converted from Hindus.
@@rajendrawandhare9114 not All though , Punjabis and Sindhis are .we are happy that we converted , not going to face discrimination just because born to a lower caste person, not going to be unhygienic, not going to spend my life hating a particular religion. Truth is that every Muslim is converted or reverted for us. Since even Arabs were idol worshipers , they used to have same rituals that Hindus have , burring daughter alive, same nonsense playing with fire , dancing . Giving food to god 😂.a converted has more value in islam than a non converted , since they faced the hardship to leave their ancestorial religion and break apart from their culture and family. And I and all Pakistanis are not converted since we were born to Muslims.
Thanks!
🙌
Good to see a Pakistani, A proud sindhi, fearlessly describing truth in a horrible country like Pakistan. Hats off to you. God bless you. ❤
lol, India is just as horrible, not really the vishaw guru modi has us all believing, not morally, economically, militarily, Pakistan is not much worse than India at the moment.
Sab changa nayi si.
@@shames-ulhaq4296India is going to become 3rd largest economy by 2028 end and military power too. Learn to accept reality and shun the leftist mindset.
@@shames-ulhaq4296 lol, think about pakistan which has the most number of prescribed terrorist organisations in the world and survives on begging and aid from all over the world whereas India slowly gradually progresses on its own mitigating challenges and hardships. Try to study and analyse before making a F00L of yourself in the public
@@shames-ulhaq4296 bhut dard hi tere ander bhut achi baat issi dard mi jee
Kyun jhoot bol raha hai bhai yaha Akbar aur Apj Abdul Kalam ko kaun bura bolta hai yo Hamesha Hero rahenge @@shames-ulhaq4296
One Interesting Fact:
The 2 most common images used to depict Amar Shaheed Maharaja Dahir of Sindh are the actual images of 2 different Rajas of the Princely States of India during British Rule.
1. Maharaja Ranbir Singh Jamwal (Dogra Ruler) of Jammu and Kashmir.
2. Maharaja Sawai Madho Singh II Rajawat (a Rajput of Kachwaha clan) of the Jaipur Princely State.
Are you rajpoot
Very well explained. Love from India 🇮🇳
❤️
Sindhi youth is atleast clear that Bin Qasim is a villain..
Yes
Sindhi tou yehi kahenge na 😂
Nope a hero who gave us freedom from dungcake eater.now our people not eating dungcake.
اسلام سب سے پہلے ہے یہ دیسی لبرلز اب تاریخ کے نام پر اسلام کی تبلیغ اسلام کے ہیروز کے خلاف برسر پیکار ہیں
❤❤❤❤
Shahzad, you are a gem. I earnestly pray that Allah SWT keeps you under His special protection. The Hasmites came to Sindh to seek refuge from the atrocities of the Umayyad. That is why the Umayyad attacked Sindh.
❤️
This type of thought is incredible in 🇵🇰 Pakistan
🙌
I don't think people won't like this coz lies make them feel good and truth is bitter.
Absolutely
Mal e ghanimat, wat booty, sex slavery, women trades are justified and glorified by some religious scriptures.
I agree with everything except your perception about Hindutva. Hindutva is a reaction by Hindus to protect their ways of life. Majority of Muslims in the Indian subcontinent never protested against radical gazwah-e-hind attitude towards Hindus. Like someone said a moderate Muslim is one that doesn’t do jihad towards other religions
. .. but also never says anything to stop radical voices in Islam.
Hindus have been suffering for centuries…even 70 years after partition, the attitude of Muslim towards Hindus in the subcontinent hasn’t changed. Hindutva is a defensive movement to preserve Hindu way of life, which has been going on for over 5000 years in this part of the world.
The answer to this is hidden in your question this guy is one of hidden radicals who is hiding true nature of islam
Totally agree
100 % correct. Pakistanis don't understand Hindutva at all and RSS/BJP less so.
But, they have to speak against these just to appear neutral.
Hindustva has nothing to do with Muslims; it has to do with Brahmavad. Muslims are not responsible for the beef ban on north India and forcing lower castes to convert.
Sir, I am an Indian, a hindu, a Brahmin. In that order and hindutva is As dangerous as Islamic radicalism. Your comment proves how dangerous it is! How brain washed hindus are getting and how radicalized hindus are getting! Hinduism is acceptance and tolerance. Hindutva is radicalism!
Khushi h ke Pakistan m abhi sache log mojod h 🙏🙏
Haha😂😂 bondan ki bat sun k comments kar diye g haha
Mohammad bin Qasim attacked Sindh because King Dahir gave shelter to Prophet Mohammad's family and when Qasim asked Dahir for the family, he refused to give it back and attacked Sindh. Is this true?
Yes absolutely true
which one. Any reference
@relaxingsound6539 read history books. One of the bibi's mazar or grave is in Sindh
@relaxingsound6539 the tomb of famous saint hazrat abdullah shah ghazi r.a. is also in Karachi. He was the great grandson of the Holly prophet. He was also martyred while fighting alone against the soldiers of hajjaj bin yousuf (Allah's curse is upon him)
@@bachoogranger so you are saying that muhammad bin qasim came to sindh just to martyr ahla bait and some how he did not and they not only did tableeg but also florish?? Also i used to thought that the only generation holy prophet had through hazart ali and everyone martyred except hazart zain ul abedin and he also stayed under umayyed.
and you did not give me any book reference as i search "the bibi's mazar book" and "grave is in Sindh" on google and i did not get anything
I am from India brother keep up the good work. Truh shall always prevail. Thank you for this.
After dahir raja bapa rawal defeated arabic invasion no invasions till next 500 years and in this time iran egypt spain turkey all fell
Yes he defeated. But don't know what you're talking g about iran and turkey.
bapa rawal have alliance with Nagbhatt, Danti Durga
@@Carryminatiroastvx3dw Not alliance it was called the Rajput Confederacy where all the rajput kingdom united to create a single polity and the initiative was taken by Nagbhatt II of Pratihara dynasty in which Bappa Rawal joined
@@saagnickchakraborty7758 kibabh padha kr... Pratihar, Rastrakoot, Gujar ne Rajput ke sath alliance banaya tha.. Nagbhatt ise lead kr rahe the...une hi Al-Junyad ko mara tha...bad me unne Kannauj pr attack kiya vaha pr Nagbhatt vs Dharampal ke beech badi War hui thi jisme Nagbhatt ne Magadha ki 50k celvery ko defeat kiya tha.. Jab padha na ho to likha mat kiya karo..
@@maxtryme1508He means Iran Turkey Egypt all fell to arab armies and became Muslim.
10:00 no, not everything is a Binary
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj had many Muslim commanders in his Army
Merit should be recognised , irrespective of person's background
Yes
@ThePakistanExperience and guess where did I find this ?
In a video on Dhruv Rathee's channel 🤣
@@shatnermohanty6678this is what he does best, it sells half truth
@@shatnermohanty6678that's half truth. What Shivaji Maharaj did after he got betrayal you haven't read. You just believe what Rathi said.
@@shatnermohanty6678 but it's true.
Similar to Tippu Sultan story that he loved Bharat and he’s a nationalist. Bullshit he was a tyrant who had one goal of ethnic genocide and cleansing in name of Islam
No.
@@maxtryme1508yes he was ok go and read his own letter 😂
Gobareater you didn't learn shit from this video
His father was general of mysore king,he betrayed him and took the kingdom and he is not of indian origin
@@ravindraparmar96 but sir in india it's diff. Even if they come from outside. They are more bharatiya than any Indian. All mughals are loving people who came and peacefully integrated into hindu culture. That's what our books say. They aren't wrong but it's the hindy resistance that was considered as violent instead of freedom movement. I agree Haider was adopted and later he killed the vadiyars to become sultan.
Indians have always defended every son of the soil hero...whether he was born in pakistan or either india...also from whatever religion he was either sikh(eg.Ranjeet singh),muslim(Tipu sultan),hindu...
Bovine excrement consumption isnt the culture of the land
I've seeing wat indianr talking about tipu sultan nowadays
@owaissheraz except some bjp ideologists no one says wrong about tipu...the majority opinion of indians is still the same as of tipu,ranjeet Singh and others...our books also don't treat tipu as a traitor...but as a hero
@@owaissherazwe talk about both good and bad. We don't believe in hero worship like you do with jinnah. It's unfair to show only good and not the bad things. We're not blind now.
@@owaissherazjust read tipu sultan original letters from British records then say something. He was not a hero. His father was fine but not Tipu.
Jis Tarah Sindh ke hero raja dahir hen..isi Tarah Punjab ke hero maharaja Ranjit Singh,Hari Singh nalwa, shaheed Bhagat Singh Sandhu aur Rai Ahmed Khan kharal Hain Jo ke isi dharti ke betey hen ❤ naa ke ghaznawi abdali hen
Awais Sandhu
If you go deep down further then you will have lots of questions and criticism about entire islamic history including the character of prophet muhammad.
Bappa Rawal also. Rawalpindi sheher unke hi naam par hai
Dulla Bhatti v veer ji
Maine B Jab Engineer Sb se M Bin Qasim ki Story Suni thi Tab se Reality ka Pata chala tha.
You explained in more detail today. Your videos have increased my knowledge a lot. ❤
❤️
انجینیئر بھی شیعہ زدہ رافضی ہے اور اس کے اندھے روایت پرست پیروکار بھی۔ کاش وہ انجینیئر کی بجائے پرویز کو پڑھتے سنتے تو کفر نہ بکتے۔
Haha😂😂 bondan ko bondan 😂 g
Love from Rajasthan, India ❤️
❤️
Very well explained.
🙌
Outstanding shahzad .....eye opening
🙌
Maybe in later years..... pakistani will teach history to their children that zia ul haq came from Arab and conquer Sindh by killing Raja Dahir😂😂
😂
Hahaha 😂
May be
Pakistan me sach bolne wale bhi hai....kya baat hai....nice bro...keep it up
🙌
Jab Bhagat Singh Gaddar Ho Sakta Aap K Liye Toh Baki Baat Kya Kare 😢
Sahi kaha
Sahi kaha Bhai
Shehzad, please make a series about our heroes and freedom fighters from this region, including Sindhis like Hemu Kalani and Punjabis like Bhagat Singh. As you already made a video on Rai Ahmed Kharal, please create a list of our true heroes 🙏
🙌
Kasim or chach ki ladai pehle comercial thi,phir territorial bani, age chal kar religious bani, Britishers ne ideological bana ke 2 nation bna diye
Love you Shehzad bhai ❤️🌸
❤️
All people of Pakistan should realise this😢
What energetic start bha❤
❤️
Beautiful narration, very honest, an eye opener for many. Ur kind of people are needed in this sub continent. Regards frm India.
🙌
Hum mulla sy avoid krney ki kosis krty hain.....tum loog goodi media sy bach k raho aur rss sy
If you ask as a Pakistani, then the answer is Muhammad Bin Qasim. If you ask as a descendant of the civilisation that is as old as 5000 years. Then Raja Dahir as he was a local king who died defending his country.
Now don't confuse Pakistan with Islam. Pakistan as a concept came into existence when foreign invaders who happened to be Muslims wanted locals be to loyal. What better way than to convert locals to your civilisation. They taught them to hate their own ancestors. Take up Arab names and culture. Now don't say it was Muslim culture. Because it wasn't. Turks, Arabs, Slavs, South East Asians all converted to Islam but maintained their ethnic identity. Only in Sub Continent the locals were converted culturally to hate their own ancestors..
Not sure MBQ ka Pakistan say bhi kya hee taluq hay
Just a myth the state created
@@ThePakistanExperience Pakistan se koi taluk nehi he ji.. just Hindu hatred me Pakistani bol jaate he Ki Bahar se aye hue Lootero ko apna hero . Ye ap bhi jante ho apke dil ke andar ..
@@ThePakistanExperience
One of the wives of imam Hussein R. A was Sindhi
Named Bibi shahr banu
Tu kuch unconfirmed stories mei
Unhoon nei maswara kiya kei bache kuche ahle bait Sindh mei refuge lei lein
This is another counter theory to pak studies Arab conquest narrative
The white man colonized our minds-- divided us,ruled over us, used religion to sow discord. It's colonial,imperial, racist bullshit. All of it. There is power and short term success in these tactics, therefore it sticks, for decades, even centuries. We need to decolonise our minds. No one touched by the "superior" white man is unaffected (before the Indians start claiming to be better than everyone else).
Brave brave fact disclosure
Love and respect to you bro ❤️🎉
❤️
Shezad ghias ❌ eye opener ✅
🙌
Another narrative I read is. - Bin Qasim lays a siege around the capital of Raja Dahir. Even after a year, he fails to breach the fort.
Theirs is an understanding amongst the Sindhi troops that if a white flag is hoisted on top of the temple on the hill, they will surrender.
At the end of the year, Bin Qasim is ready to call it quits.
Apparently a Brahmin minister of Raja Dahir put up a white flag in the middle of the night.
Next morning, the doors of the fort were opened.
This is one of many stories of treachery by Indians against their own kings.
The same goes on with Mir Jaffer and Mir Sadiq.
Indians are not aware of Kasim or Raja Dahir. Although IMHO we are taught about pretty neutral history of 5000+ years which covers almost all major kings of 'India' , Ashok, Chandragupta, Mughals, Tipu Sultan , Shivaji Maharaj , British and the revolutionaries -1857-1947(both violent and non-violent ones).
Then students learn ours heroes and villains both come from all religions. No fake history. Just what happened.
😂😂😂.Pakistani people aren’t Indian. Indian word is mostly used by Western colonizer. Islam is first identity of Pakistan. There is nothing glorious than Islam and Allah. God is older than your kings.
Bhai.... Satish chandra ki book padh... Old ncert.... Kuch ata pta ni h Tuje.... 😂😂😂
@@ravimeena8918 bas old ncert hi padne ke liye hoti h kya be...tujhe bhut pta h...bakwas Mt kr jaada..
Indians r well aware of Raja Dahir bhai. Which world u r living in? History classes pe homework assignments nhi dete the kya tum log ko?
Bhai NCERT ki book kholi h kabhi?
Indian Hindu even forgot about Sikh empire and Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Who ruled in PANJAB, Gilgit and parts of Tibet and shared border with China, instead of his statue, Hindus erected Shiva Ji statute near China border.
Ranjit singh had nothing to do with Ladakh. Hindu Dogra General Zorawar Singh conquered Ladakh.
Statue of Shivaji Maharaj was erected by Men from Maratha Regiment who revere Shivaji Maharaj.
Apni whatsapp university se bahr aaja. Maharaja Ranjit Singh ki koi ijjat nhi krta tere Pakistan mei
indian hindu didn't forget mahraja ranjit singh we have various statues of him and even chapters about him in history books, maratha also ruled pan india.
and shivaji statue is celebartion of spirit of 'hindvi swaraj' that he gave to fight the mughal empire. your comments tells the ignorance of pakistani people.
we don't teach fake history in our schools and nor we choose hero on basis of religion.
Maharaja ranjit Singh can never be forgotten. He was the first to establish an Indian independent kingdom parallel to British
سچ تفصل سے بیان کرنے کے لئے بہُت بہُت شکریہ ۔🌹❤️💐🙏
🙌
6:10 Just a correction here, in those days it wasn't uncommon for 17 years olds to be leading armies. Childhood is a very recent concept where you are a child one day, and after the clock strikes 12 you're magically an adult.
None the less, Hajjaj bin Yusuf was indeed a very controversial person in history, and we should definitely learn about the life of the Prophet (pbuh) before taking such people as heroes.
I am showing you from historical sources that Hajjaj thought he was immature. General baatain nahee kar raha
Watch amirhaq he exposed you@@ThePakistanExperience
Spread love, peace love from 🇮🇳🇮🇳
❤️
Hum mulla sy avoid krney ki kosis krty hain.....tum loog goodi media sy bach k raho aur rss sy
My ancestors were from Indus Valley and later migrated with the king who founded Bahawalpur.I am so happy that now so many Pakistani are exploring the history.
One of the reasons why Shri. Arif Ajakia is not in pakistan. The man only asked why are you patronizing Qasim.
Ajif ajakia maybe right on this, lekin he ain't some Indian to advise Indians to whether support modi or not, he has no right to interfere in our internal affairs
Raja Dahir was a Kashmiri Brahman and King of Sindh
Raja Dahir was a saviour of humanity
Raja Dahir is the Real and only Hero!
Photographs of Ranbir Singh and Raja Madhu Singh II have been mistakenly attributed to Raja Dahar. Kindly refrain from using unverified or unauthentic images.
I'm so thankful for this channel ❤
❤️
❤Raja Dahir ❤
❤️
@@ThePakistanExperience when you Become Babu Rao 😂😂😂
Good to see such content reclaiming the roots. This will help a country to become dignified country. Keep it up. Take care.
When people change their religion they change their cultural tradition, language, ideology, their role model, heroes, etc
Indian subcontinent Muslims are best example of it
Kon the kya mere bhai sab hindu the jo ki convert hokar sab musalman ban gaye talwar ke dam par. Vaise you are a good analyst.
Shezad bhai I appreciate you for talking about such important and avoided topics… Keep up the good work ❤
Nobody Le: Sindhi text book board jamshoro- M-Qasim ne 17 saal ki umer ma sindh fatah kiya pr q bhai?😂
Seeing your videos everytime they pop up on my timeline makes me feel there are still many good and matured audience in Pakistan as well. ❤
❤️
ngl Bin Qasim is sounding alot like Imran Khan from 2010s
😂
भाई, आप बहुत खुले दिमाग से सही बात कह रहे है, धन्यवाद!
Raja Dahir Shaheed teri azmat ko salam.
او بھوسڑی کے وہ شہید نہیں ہے وہ تو ہندو تھا
Good to see honest youtubers 👌. Love from India ❤
❤️
It is also said that members of prophet Mohammed’s family took refuge in Sindh after the martyrdom of Hussain. And, the caliph didn’t want any descendant of the prophet to claim the caliphate.
I personally think this to be a valid narrative because the consequences of a living descendant of the prophet would pose such a huge threat to the caliphs.
There’s even a sect of Punjabis who fought with/for Hussain.
To date, they are called Hussaini Brahmins. Bollywood actor Guru Dutt belonged to that community. Sanjay Dutt is his son.
Why would any Arab caliph pay so much attention to the remote region of Sindh if his political opponents had not sought refuge there?
I have heard that too
I think you meant Sunil Dutt is father of Sanjay Dutt
Guru Dutt's surname is actually Padukone and he is from Karnataka
@shatnermohanty6678 Yes, you are right. Sunil Dutt.
The accusation that Muhammad bin Qasim “attacked the Prophet’s family” stems from:
• His loyalty to Hajjaj bin Yusuf and the Umayyads, who suppressed revolts by Ahl al-Bayt supporters.
• His participation in campaigns against regions and groups that sometimes included Ahl al-Bayt loyalists.
However, there is no direct historical evidence of Muhammad bin Qasim personally attacking or targeting the Prophet’s family. His military campaigns in Sindh were part of the Umayyad empire’s expansion, rather than a direct assault on Ahl al-Bayt.
Broader Context
1. Umayyad Oppression of Ahl al-Bayt:
• The Umayyads are widely criticized in Islamic history for their persecution of the Prophet’s family and their followers.
• Hajjaj bin Yusuf, in particular, played a significant role in suppressing Ahl al-Bayt loyalists in Iraq and the Hejaz.
2. Reevaluation of Muhammad bin Qasim:
• Muhammad bin Qasim is largely remembered for his conquest of Sindh and the establishment of Islamic rule in the region.
• His legacy is seen more as a military and administrative figure rather than a political player in the conflicts between the Umayyads and Ahl al-Bayt.
Conclusion
The claim that Muhammad bin Qasim attacked the Prophet Muhammad’s family is more likely tied to his association with the Umayyad administration and its broader actions against Ahl al-Bayt loyalists. However, there is no conclusive historical evidence to suggest that he personally targeted the family of the Prophet. His primary role was as a general tasked with expanding the empire in the east.
Now we must change our missiles name from Ghuri to raja ranjit Singh 😂
Raja dahir is our national hero❤
Long live sindh✊🏻
❤️
Shehzad bhai ek he dil hai kitni bar lo ge? ❤
❤️
Acha laga bhai... Ap thoda khule dimag se soch rahe ho.. Pakistan needs more guys like u😊
🙌
Sachai har kisi Ko hajam nahin hota hai bhai❤❤
❤️
Pakistan Zindabad!!! , luveddd ur shirt wohoo
❤️
The truth, no Pakistani & Bangladeshi would believe.😊
If Afghanistan is now being portrayed as an enemy country, then the names of Pakistani missiles like "Abdali," "Ghauri," and "Ghaznavi" should be replaced with the names of heroes from Sindh, Balochistan, Punjab, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa who defended this land against foreign invaders.
The "geniuses" in our security establishment don’t seem to realize that the Afghan figures they glorified as heroes out of hatred for Hindus and enmity with India-because they massacred Hindus-also massacred millions of Muslims. These figures (like Abdali, Ghauri, and Ghaznavi) were merely invaders and plunderers who did not distinguish between Hindus and Muslims.
If the security establishment does not make such changes, then this "new enemy" (Afghanistan) will also appear to be just another political game.
Pakistan doesn’t need wars; it needs peace and good neighborly relations with all its neighbors. Promoting a war frenzy is not patriotism.
Ghurids and Ghaznavids weren't afghans. Pashtuns aren't native to the region of KPK, the natives of the region are Indo-Aryan Chitralis, hindkowans similarly the balochis are not native to the region of Balochistan, both pashtuns and balochis migrated and settled here during the Turko-Mongol invasions of the Indian Subcontinent
Can Someone just think Why there is Bamiyan Buddha statue engraved in Stone In Afganistan.In fact lord Buddha who was Youvraj of Hindu Raja,Started Buddha religion and one time Whole Area from Afganistan to Myanmar Became BUDDIST,afterwards AadiShankararaya who originated from Kerala Held debate with Various Kingdoms who were Buddhist & Convinced them to become Hindus .So this land was & is land of HINNDUS
Baloch have lived in Balochistan for thousands of years, with roots in the ancient Mehergarh civilization. The claim about migration from Syria is misquoted recorded history shows only a small group of Baloch went to fight there and returned to Makran. Baloch are natives of this land, and parts of present-day Punjab were historically part of Balochistan. Baloch are one of the oldest nations, with a history deeply rooted in this region.
The Baloch have fought invaders throughout history:
1. Achaemenid Persians - Resisted by Baloch tribes.
2. Alexander the Great - Resisted by Baloch tribes in Makran.
3. Sassanid Persians - Resisted by Baloch tribes.
4. Arab Invaders (Umayyads, Abbasids) - Resisted by Mir Jalal Khan and his people.
5. Turks (Seljuks, Ghaznavids) - Resisted by Baloch tribes.
6. Persian Safavids - Fought by Naseer Khan Noori.
7. Portuguese - Fought by Mir Hammal Kalmati.
8. Mughal Empire - Resisted by Mir Chakar Khan Rind.
9. Afghan Durranis - Resisted by Naseer Khan Noori.
10. British Empire - Fought by Mir Mehrab Khan and Mir Dost Muhammad Khan Barakzai.
11. Pakistani Government - Resisted by Sardar Nauroz Khan, Nawab Akbar Bugti, and Balaach Marri many others.
The Baloch have a long history of courage, protecting their land and identity.
Finally a video of yours I watched from beginning to end in a long while. Only criticism I have is that background music was way too damn loud (and honestly quite unnecessary) but otherwise the presentation was on point and factual. Thanks for doing a great job in exposing the real history of these Arab conquerors.
Awesome content Shehzad bhai! 🙌
You tackle each untrue things with true facts and we love to see you putting up so much good work! Love and wishes from 🇮🇳
❤️🙌
Please read vikram sampath for the other side of story..
@Popularfuzzyking-t1z the destruction of hindu temple and their persecution which these pakistanis call political not religious .
book is " hindu temples what happened to them" by sita ram goel . with full list of hindu temples that was destroyed by islamic invaders almost 40,000 and several build mosque upon them to humiliate hindus.
Good to see now people of Pakistan are talking sense 👏 thank you brother ..
🙌
Pakistan should either have a democracy like India with real power with elected leaders.
Or no democracy and power with Army like UAE, China etc
But either ways power and accountability should go hand in hand.
Right now Army has all the power and zero accountability to the aawam.
First youtuber from Pakistan jise the dil se ❤❤❤❤ from Bharat
Hum mulla sy avoid krney ki kosis krty hain.....tum loog goodi media sy bach k raho aur rss sy
Muslim bhioo 3 mahine pahele Syed Muzammil Sahab ne ek video banaye thi yahe topic pe tab Amir Haq ne refute Kiya tha. Un k claim Ku. Awaz e haq (TH-cam channel) pe. Aap ja k waha b ek Baar dhak sakty.. aap Ku saari BAAT bahetar tareeqe se samj Mai Aaye ge.. insha'Allah
Video ki link bhejo bhai wali
Awesome video bro, very insightful. Not sure if u going to see this comment. But if u ever ever ever come to New Zealand, Auckland, I would love to host u bro. Dare I say, we have better biryani than India and Pakistan in Auckland 😊, best wishes and keep up the good work. Love the ending of the video when u say “padho” .
🙌
The sad part is many Muslims in India also see these people as great conquerors rather than brutal foreign invaders which they were.
Not many. Most of them.
Great presentation. You have the courage to speak the truth. Hope more people in Pak learn history like you. Hope some fine day this great land and its people unite again.
🙌
Tamam behtreen
🙌
Raja Dahir was one of the only generals in history who fought themselves in the battleground.
You shouldnt have used "jihadi" word in a negative way at 5:22 as our Prophet SAWW himself was a Jihadi himself.
Negative Abe bhai woh hai negative logo ko marna uska bhi koi positive term hota hai kya
@@SriAnni-v5p true
And your prophet was positive?
@@YuddhaVeera ofc, he's prophet of god
@JackSparrow-r4r for the indoctrinated and not for others.
Very well narrated story. Well done Shahzad. You are a gem. More power to you.
🙌
It’s essential to approach history with objectivity and context rather than emotional or political biases. Muhammad bin Qasim was a pivotal figure in the subcontinent's history, bringing advancements in governance, religious tolerance, and cultural integration during his time in Sindh. His administration laid the foundation for centuries of Islamic influence that shaped the region’s identity, art, and scholarship.
While Raja Dahir's resistance is part of our history, glorifying him at the expense of undermining historical facts about Muhammad bin Qasim disregards the larger picture of historical evolution and progress. Both figures represent different eras and ideologies, but dismissing one to elevate the other is neither intellectually honest nor constructive.
History should unite us through understanding, not divide us through selective interpretations. Let us respect all contributions to our heritage without compromising on historical accuracy.
The history is simple one is a local defender
The other is foreign invader.
If someone comes to loot your house now whatever the reason is, he is the villain.
Your words are very diplomatic...i am sorry but a foreign invader is always a villain for the locals ...it's like praising British for looting India ...you have absolutely no dignity and respect for your Land ..no doubt Pakistan is in such big trouble...
Bravo!!!
❤❤❤
&
👏👏👏
Truth - nothing but truth
👍👍👍
More & more power to you young man !!!
✊️👊🤛🤜
❤️
Same here mere bhai, like Gandhi is shoved down our throats here in India.
Gandhi was not bad guy. Only folly was trusting sumlims too much
@@mylord3003not saying he was a bad guy but over-selling one person as a “peaceful” hero and over-attributing the freedom story to him.
@@ssidhu8327If you are denying his roles in freedom. You are ignorant of history. He made few wrong decisions too. But there is no need to compare him to the Qasim narrative of Pakistan. Read about Gandhi, almost blasphemous. Read about Gandhi, he will definitely earn your respect.
@@mylord3003at least he fought British unlike salvarkar
@@ssidhu8327 Gandhi fought against british. Savarkar fought with british against gandhi.😂
There was no caliph of Baghdad, Baghdad was founded much later during the time of abbasids. Umayyad Caliph was in Damascus, that was the capital at the time.
Books says Caliph in Baghdad.
@@ThePakistanExperience It seems the writer likely referred to the Governor of Iraq rather than the Caliph of Baghdad, as Baghdad had not yet been founded during that time. The reigning Caliph was Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, based in Damascus, the capital of the Umayyad Caliphate. At that time, the main administrative centers in Iraq were Kufa, Basra, and Wasit-the latter being a city founded by Al-Hajjaj himself. Al-Hajjaj served as the Governor of Iraq, playing a pivotal role in maintaining Umayyad authority in the region. I truly appreciate the content you’ve shared!
I wonder sometimes how much effort and energy it has taken for the
so called protectors of faith called Islam to prove wrongs aa rights.
Haven't watched the video but title gives goosebumps ⚡
🙌
@@ThePakistanExperienceHoodie is sponsored by PCB ? 🤔
Sabhi pakistani converted Hindu hi hai Hindu bno Insaan bno
Kitna bhi jhoot bola gaya wo ek din bahar nikal hi aata hai...Ab bhi sudhar jao, tum converted ho... Tumhare baap-dada Hindu the,hai aur rahenge... Jai Shree Ram