I was actually shot in the head by another bow hunter with a broad head while elk hunting in Idaho. Fortunately it was a glancing blow off the top of my head from the front. I always wondered what would have happened had the arrow had hit me a couple of inches lower. I guess you cleared that one up! I would have liked to see a test from the front hitting the skull in the forehead which is where I would have been hit had it been a little lower.
@@saiyendemon5437 It was an accident, but then the person who shot me fled the scene. You are right, according to the sheriff, he could be facing potential charges of attempted murder or manslaughter. He should not have fled.
Why would u think they were doing that to trick you? That's a very weird way to see an obvious editing mistake.... Wtf??? What's the point of them doing that to what end? Fuckin weirdos
@@garethh6962 That's true, but people have survived things like that, or even if they die they might have time to pull a trigger or something. The medulla shot is like pulling the plug. Maybe I should have said "instant off". Isn't arguing semantics fun?! LOL!
I have just finished reading both the Savage son and the devil's hand. Both are Excellence books and I look forward to reading more of them in the future!
I never got an upload notif. Your channel is really being suppressed, no fucking reason you only have like 20k views. Absolutely ridiculous. Feel for you Ryan, much love and respect. This was a great episode, Mr. Carr is an American legend and hero.
Genius! Field tip/broadhead, just watch these comments blow up, well played! I’m just commenting to help out with the algorithm, hope it helps, keep up the fantastic work. All the thumbs ups 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
I don’t understand how this channel doesn’t have millions of subs and views. Nowhere els can you get this top quality slowmotion footage of guns and explosions and godknows what els . Clearly made big investments on equipment and his Chanel yet people like demo ranch who hasn’t changed in year but has millions of viewers. I think TH-cam is deliberate dimming this TH-cam
How do you know if someone is a MARINE, they've told you a 100x ! How do you know if someone is a Navy SEAL? Because they will try to sell you their book! All joking aside, good show, and damn good coffee!
Step 1 uh buds school Step 2 forget that you can't go to buds cause you fat Step 3 cry cause you won't be as badass as everyone in black rifle coffee (the best coffee in the world)
Step 2 can become "lose ton of weight and get it!". david goggins is the prime example. the guy was obese and hunting cockroaches at the time he decided to go for the Seals. read his book, its amazing.
I have 80# limbs that measure 84# draw weight with a 29.5” draw, I have 18 grains of string weight and shoot older victory vap V1 arrows with a SS outsert, a 200gr tungsten outsert weight, 1.75” blazers, TKO nock and a D2 tool steel 175gr Maasai style fixed broad head with a chisel grind. Total arrow weight is 679 grains. I can drill through pork shoulders and the shoulder joint. I’ve shot fence posts and put a hole in a steel fence post where it penetrated, did not pass through broke the arrow and the broad head.
This is pretty cool. I wish you guys would do some videos with some recurve bows or some longbow s. You can get just as much speed out of one you just got to be stronger to pull it. And in my own not very important opinion I think that it's more artistic and beautiful to instinct shoot without sights then it is to have a scope or crosshairs etc etc on your bow.
Since I refuse to edit any of my comments and TH-cam was stupid and didn't let me keep typing, my last statement was going to be there are different strokes for different folks. I can understand the advantages and enjoying shooting a compound bow I enjoy shooting them as well. I just think it would be neat to see some recurve stuff on the channel
Traditional bows are not about speed, they are about raw power. The inertia and force of a heavier arrow from a traditional bow has been shown to penetrate and pass through things, more specifically solid things, much deeper and efficiently than the extremely light, fast arrows used by compound archers. The compound bow, itself, has to compensate for this flaw. Fast can be a very bad thing. The faster an arrow, the easier it is to shatter on impact. This is also true about bullets, where a musket can shoot deeper into water than a 50 caliber, which obliterated the round on the surface without making any depth at all on Mythbusters. Another thing is the spin. You can see in the slow motion that the arrows didn't spin at all. I see so many test videos just like this and it's so totally different with a traditional bow. Traditional archery causes the arrow to spin and drill a massive hole through the target. Single bevel broadheads create a distinct S-shaped hole that causes severe blood loss and thus makes fantastic blood trails. Some 3-blade heads spread the wound so far that the animal can't even make it 10 yards before flopping over. Agree 100% that I want to see traditional bows added to the arsenal because compounds do not behave at all like traditional archery equipment.
@@Lycantis thanks for your super long explanation. But if you've ever taken a physics class, you would know that speed and power are directly related. Force equals mass times acceleration. So the faster your arrows going the more force it's hitting the target with. Not that any of what you said about aero shattering and stuff makes a bit of difference unless you're using a graphite arrow. If you use a heavy arrowhead relative to the shaft anyway and a light shaft and you shoot it and it goes quickly then whatever it hits is going to achieve more penetration or at least knock it backwards farther because it's exhibiting more force on it. This is the exact same reason that a 50 cal doesn't go as deep in the water as a 22. It's going faster and it spreads out and it's bigger so it releases all of its force onto the water because water is not compressible.
@@michaelfrench3396 This may get a tad long because I cannot tell your tone and don't want a miscommunication. You have already figured out I give extensive explanations and my teachers got just as exhausted with my essays. Ahem. First off, I was coached by experienced traditional archers since I was 13 and I was a high score student in physics. In my wall of text, I was specifically using archery physics in practice, not on paper. My comparisons were on asserting speed in projectiles as a possible crippling effect. These experiments have been posted by TH-camrs near and far, been on the History Channel, and the actual experiments negate some aspects of physics. This in particular: "Force equals mass times acceleration. So the faster your arrows going the more force it's hitting the target with." I was specifically talking about the raw inertia of the arrow and penetration, not the force of impact, which is negligible if the arrow can't make it through to begin with. The faster an arrow moves, the more inertia is lost on initial impact, releasing the force prematurely and allowing for error and failure to penetrate. The Mythbusters episode I used showed speed becoming a crippling effect, where the force was released all at once on the surface, negating the lethality of the shot. The 50 cal round was tapered to a fine point, meaning it did not have "spread", since that should have been negated by the shape of the round. The musket ball (not a 22 round), however, had the most surface area of the two and should have flattened on impact, but glided through easily. The statement of water being incompressible is false, and even professionals get that wrong so that can be waived due to misunderstanding the physics of water. Water is *relatively* incompressible. Forces of extreme pressure can compress it, turning the immediate surface into a solid barrier more powerful than concrete. Or, as seen in deep water compressing itself through extreme gravitational pressure, it can become dense enough to squish a submarine. Speed becomes crippling, in this regard. The faster the projectile, the less time water has to move out of the path, ergo compressing into a higher density, and thus shattering the faster, heavier, and pointier round while having almost no effect on the slow, lighter, completely spherical object. Now a physics lesson in archery: with relatively equal equipment, say a heavy bow and one heavy, slower arrow and one lighter, faster arrow. The heavier arrow will have more penetration because it keeps a majority of its inertia at impact, which is essential for hunters as bone is often hit because there is extreme margin for error on shooting something with a skeleton and thick fur that can almost act like a gambeson (ancient cloth armor designed to hinder arrow penetration). A second video has equal arrows, but the faster the arrow due to the force of the bow, the more easily it shattered on impact, negating higher speed as remotely effective. There was one middle ground speed, where the slower one had less damage inflicted and the highest speed caused the arrow to break in half and not penetrate as deep as it could have. I would need to go back to it but I am quite sure there was damage to the broadheads, with higher speed causing more damage. The archer in question didn't use equivalent nor appropriate equipment for the circumstances, so the speed is the only factor that will be used here because it was the only consistency along with the same arrows/tips used. The previous video used the same bow but different speed/weights for the arrows but also needs more of a control as a basis. The above paragraph was mostly aimed at this: "Not that any of what you said about aero shattering and stuff makes a bit of difference unless you're using a graphite arrow." The arrows weren't graphite, but the faster the projectile moved, the easier it shattered. Broadhead type may have made the difference. Bodkins are a special armor-piercing tip that's exaggeratedly pointy and release enough force at the tip to penetrate armor, then have enough weight in the heavier, slower arrow to make it continue moving. Failure to penetrate armor transfers the force through the armor, which will still cause serious pain and injury to the person wearing it. Higher speeds simply means the arrow makes it farther from the archer, enabling long-distance shooting. Extreme high-pound traditional bows are still obnoxiously slow compared to the faster arrows in an equal poundage compound of today shooting lighter arrows, but have been shown to be more deeply penetrating in field practice. "If you use a heavy arrowhead relative to the shaft anyway and a light shaft " Please, never, ever, use a light arrow shaft in a traditional bow unless it's a pansy stick around 30#. In my years with watching novices choose archery equipment, I have seen people get the strength to use a higher-pound bow, then thinking high speeds were the meta of all stats to arrow force, use light shafts and either heavy or light broadheads...then end up in the emergency room with shards of arrow shaft sticking out of their hand/arm, missing fingers, punctured eye(s), etc. Higher poundage requires a shaft with a heavier grain (meaning a lower number--these are not baseline uniform and you need to discuss grain need for a traditional bow with an expert at the dealership or with the maker you get them from) and the head is somewhat important, with heavier broadheads being a bit deeper-penetrating than lighter. Shape of the broadhead matters more. Aluminum shafts and other bound materials can tend to let people get away with using shoddy arrows, but they are crippling their potential with using improper equipment. "whatever it hits is going to achieve more penetration or at least knock it backwards farther because it's exhibiting more force on it" ...If your broadhead makes anything it hits move backward, you are using the wrong equipment. Force should never be expended into the target unless it's meant to stop an arrow, like archery butts and armor. Having a light shaft (which I explained is not a good idea) and a heavy head (which is negated because the light shaft has less inertia to push the broadhead forward after impact), does not mean better penetration; it will lose most of its force on impact. Apologies for the extrapolation text wall, but being challenged on physics--especially archery--will bring out every expert archery book lining my bookshelf, especially the physics ones. Even the material the bow is made from affects the physics of archery.
@@Lycantis I'm calling bullshit on your whole statement. I don't believe a thing you wrote. And don't use big words if you don't know what they mean. There is no way that an arrow loses inertia when it hits a target. Seeing as inertia is the tendency for something to remain still or unchanged. If you had actually taken a physics class in high school, you would know that it might lose momentum. It might lose some velocity, but it is getting closer and closer to it's point of inertia. As soon as it stops it's inert. Maybe instead of typing mile-long TH-cam comments, you could actually go to school and learn the things that you're claiming to know. Community college is pretty fun. You can work live at home with Mom and Dad and still go to school and learn things.
Some kid shredded elk ribs with a wimpy 30# so even those can be lethal if the archer is skilled enough with pansy sticks. The shot would have been even better had he not used cheap razor broadheads from Amazon or such. Good equipment makes all the difference.
(FULLMAG) Here in Brazil a Korean killed a beggar with a cheap crossbow (made in china) with just one arrow, and it wasn't even in the head, the most impressive thing is that the Korean did it with one hand driving a car.
i use to throw a disposable propane bottle in the nest of yellowjacket wasps and shoot with a .22 cal but great fun was to throw the bottles into a fire and shoot with a .22!
Every real SF guy I've ever shot with always says the same thing. "Oh I could make that shot easily back in the day, but I don't know about now" And then they proceed to group every weapon that gets put in their hands as tight as the weapon will allow. It's like they know they're the baddest of the bad, they just don't want to say it out loud. It's so awesome.
![โฮ่ง! (SUGOI) - LYKN [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nFp4zjAARFs/mqdefault.jpg)
I was actually shot in the head by another bow hunter with a broad head while elk hunting in Idaho. Fortunately it was a glancing blow off the top of my head from the front. I always wondered what would have happened had the arrow had hit me a couple of inches lower. I guess you cleared that one up! I would have liked to see a test from the front hitting the skull in the forehead which is where I would have been hit had it been a little lower.
Damn, you're a lucky guy!
Forehead?? Bro, that other hunter had it out for you.
@@unrealutensil3054 yeah dude like wtf
Your so called buddy would have been convicted of murder. No one is that stupid.
@@saiyendemon5437 It was an accident, but then the person who shot me fled the scene. You are right, according to the sheriff, he could be facing potential charges of attempted murder or manslaughter. He should not have fled.
Found amazing the field tip becaming a broadhead in slow...almost magic shots...lol
was about to comment on the same .... magic arrows tips
Yeahh.. I feel like they think people are dumb
@@deverdoo5228 you think they’re trying to trick you or something when it’s just mixed up footage in the edit?
@@braydentaylorIH61 Was about to say the same thing but my English lacked. Thanks lol
Why would u think they were doing that to trick you? That's a very weird way to see an obvious editing mistake.... Wtf??? What's the point of them doing that to what end? Fuckin weirdos
Cool transforming arrow heads, from field point on release to broad head on impact, impressive!!!
how they gonna show him shooting a field tip and then a fixed broadhead going through the head, cmon editors get it together! sick vid though
I was thinking the same thing lol
I was gonna say the same thing lol. Wonder how many takes it took lol
Im pretty sure they had ones that stay closed until shot but idk
@@caleblacy3012 no sir clearly field points then broadheads.
No way bro hahaha
I can't stop staring at the Land Cruiser in the background.......................................................oh no, I'm drooling.
Those paint cans with the arrow were way cooler than I expected!!!
I love how your field tip magically transforms into the broad head
BUOLLSHIOT
Scott from Kentucky Ballistics wants to know who your table sponsor is...
Hurt is an understatement, the dude nearly died :(
Always love the archery content
Same.
Really wish bows still had a place in the military
Your joking right?
This is premium content
Audio is borked, but still fun.
The zombies wobbly nose in slow motion was very distracting lool 😭😭😂😂
Awesome video. gotta love Jack Carr for his details and legitness.
Couldn't agree more!
The first shot at 1:55 would have been a brutal kill shot. Cutting major arteries, the spinal cord and the wind pipe at the same time.
I was thinking the same. Probably would have severed the medulla oblongata, also known as "the off switch".
You get a broadhead through your skull you 99.9% its gonna switch you off no matter were it hits..
@@garethh6962 That's true, but people have survived things like that, or even if they die they might have time to pull a trigger or something. The medulla shot is like pulling the plug. Maybe I should have said "instant off". Isn't arguing semantics fun?! LOL!
@@angryginger791 it is but those folk you see with half a head still walking are the 0.01% they get a lot of coverage and so they should lol
That was a excellent shot to hit the paint cans with a arrow from a bow at 25+yards.
Nice Fjällräven shirt Mr.Carr!!
I have just finished reading both the Savage son and the devil's hand. Both are Excellence books and I look forward to reading more of them in the future!
I never got an upload notif. Your channel is really being suppressed, no fucking reason you only have like 20k views. Absolutely ridiculous. Feel for you Ryan, much love and respect. This was a great episode, Mr. Carr is an American legend and hero.
What an awesome video. Slow mo was definitely epic.
Little more of a fireball than expected 😅🔥💥😳
Go big or go home! 💥
Looked like the spray paint molotov was heading straight for that pile of wood pallets holding up the backstop....
Cool video! I like the green blood mixture.
the rocket boost on the arrow when it it the 2nd and 3rd can was epic.
the first arrow he shoots is not the first arrow they show hitting, The tips are different.
Its an expanding broad head dummy, so dummies like you don't cut themselves while loading the arrow. It expands in flight.
With the arrow you can nail a zombie skull to a wall or door frame, just as the Celts showed us. "Nailed it." 🤗🤣🤠
So Karr's field tips transform mid air into broad heads... that is some real high speed gear right there :)
Mr. Jack Carr you rock sir. You live up to your being a Navy Seal.
Genius! Field tip/broadhead, just watch these comments blow up, well played! I’m just commenting to help out with the algorithm, hope it helps, keep up the fantastic work. All the thumbs ups 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
The lads will be like "RICHARD no explosions at work unless we are all in" Your making them jealous lololol
when the video started i thought Rick from the walking dead was gonna shoot here
the fire ball was pretty sick, a nice touch i felt
JACK CARR?!! How the hell’d you hook up with Carr!!??? Love his books!!👍🏼
JACK ATTACK!!! 🏹💀
He’s so smooth after the shot
I don’t understand how this channel doesn’t have millions of subs and views. Nowhere els can you get this top quality slowmotion footage of guns and explosions and godknows what els . Clearly made big investments on equipment and his Chanel yet people like demo ranch who hasn’t changed in year but has millions of viewers. I think TH-cam is deliberate dimming this TH-cam
Jack my favorite writerr
Last shot was excellent. Nice fireball!
Jack perfectly severed the spine with that first shot? Yeah don't mess with that dude
Why is it that when u pull back u have a field point in then when it slow mos to the head there is a brodhead?
Like the mix of bows and guns on this channel 👍
That Zombie is so quick he caught the arrow with his teeth
I'd like the HS cameras and the bow, forget the head LOL!
Jacks land cruiser is sweet wheels yea baby
This video made my day!🤘🔥🎯
How do you know if someone is a MARINE, they've told you a 100x !
How do you know if someone is a Navy SEAL? Because they will try to sell you their book!
All joking aside, good show, and damn good coffee!
Definitely my favorite book series
Epic, and It's kinda cool that it's all filmed just on a parking lot but in a control safe manner.
Very fulfilling to watch 👍
I thought the three spray paint with all that fire Was epic
Oh damn it hurt just watching that arrow go through that head!
I bet that zombie will be feeling that one in the morning...
I would love to see a slo-mo of tannerite up against a ballistic torso
Well got my like by 11 seconds in real nice
Step 1 uh buds school
Step 2 forget that you can't go to buds cause you fat
Step 3 cry cause you won't be as badass as everyone in black rifle coffee (the best coffee in the world)
Step 2 can become "lose ton of weight and get it!". david goggins is the prime example. the guy was obese and hunting cockroaches at the time he decided to go for the Seals. read his book, its amazing.
Nice Cildren!
Literary loved it , it's osm when u do dengerous things with super slo mo 🤟
brings a whole new meaning to skull fucked LOL
Looks like somebody's tired of zombies
Audio sounds like what you hear when someone butt dials you! Lol
Is this video shot in Wyoming? I feel like I have seen those exact same mountains for some reason.
Be awesome to play Tchaikovsky's 1812 overture in the gas can footage💥💨
I have 80# limbs that measure 84# draw weight with a 29.5” draw, I have 18 grains of string weight and shoot older victory vap V1 arrows with a SS outsert, a 200gr tungsten outsert weight, 1.75” blazers, TKO nock and a D2 tool steel 175gr Maasai style fixed broad head with a chisel grind. Total arrow weight is 679 grains. I can drill through pork shoulders and the shoulder joint. I’ve shot fence posts and put a hole in a steel fence post where it penetrated, did not pass through broke the arrow and the broad head.
You're the coolest group of men I've seen.
gotta get on that wind noise!
cool. He caught the arrow in his mouth.
Awsome video both of you
This is pretty cool. I wish you guys would do some videos with some recurve bows or some longbow s. You can get just as much speed out of one you just got to be stronger to pull it. And in my own not very important opinion I think that it's more artistic and beautiful to instinct shoot without sights then it is to have a scope or crosshairs etc etc on your bow.
Since I refuse to edit any of my comments and TH-cam was stupid and didn't let me keep typing, my last statement was going to be there are different strokes for different folks. I can understand the advantages and enjoying shooting a compound bow I enjoy shooting them as well. I just think it would be neat to see some recurve stuff on the channel
Traditional bows are not about speed, they are about raw power. The inertia and force of a heavier arrow from a traditional bow has been shown to penetrate and pass through things, more specifically solid things, much deeper and efficiently than the extremely light, fast arrows used by compound archers. The compound bow, itself, has to compensate for this flaw. Fast can be a very bad thing. The faster an arrow, the easier it is to shatter on impact. This is also true about bullets, where a musket can shoot deeper into water than a 50 caliber, which obliterated the round on the surface without making any depth at all on Mythbusters.
Another thing is the spin. You can see in the slow motion that the arrows didn't spin at all. I see so many test videos just like this and it's so totally different with a traditional bow. Traditional archery causes the arrow to spin and drill a massive hole through the target. Single bevel broadheads create a distinct S-shaped hole that causes severe blood loss and thus makes fantastic blood trails. Some 3-blade heads spread the wound so far that the animal can't even make it 10 yards before flopping over.
Agree 100% that I want to see traditional bows added to the arsenal because compounds do not behave at all like traditional archery equipment.
@@Lycantis thanks for your super long explanation. But if you've ever taken a physics class, you would know that speed and power are directly related. Force equals mass times acceleration. So the faster your arrows going the more force it's hitting the target with. Not that any of what you said about aero shattering and stuff makes a bit of difference unless you're using a graphite arrow. If you use a heavy arrowhead relative to the shaft anyway and a light shaft and you shoot it and it goes quickly then whatever it hits is going to achieve more penetration or at least knock it backwards farther because it's exhibiting more force on it. This is the exact same reason that a 50 cal doesn't go as deep in the water as a 22. It's going faster and it spreads out and it's bigger so it releases all of its force onto the water because water is not compressible.
@@michaelfrench3396 This may get a tad long because I cannot tell your tone and don't want a miscommunication. You have already figured out I give extensive explanations and my teachers got just as exhausted with my essays. Ahem. First off, I was coached by experienced traditional archers since I was 13 and I was a high score student in physics.
In my wall of text, I was specifically using archery physics in practice, not on paper. My comparisons were on asserting speed in projectiles as a possible crippling effect. These experiments have been posted by TH-camrs near and far, been on the History Channel, and the actual experiments negate some aspects of physics. This in particular: "Force equals mass times acceleration. So the faster your arrows going the more force it's hitting the target with." I was specifically talking about the raw inertia of the arrow and penetration, not the force of impact, which is negligible if the arrow can't make it through to begin with.
The faster an arrow moves, the more inertia is lost on initial impact, releasing the force prematurely and allowing for error and failure to penetrate.
The Mythbusters episode I used showed speed becoming a crippling effect, where the force was released all at once on the surface, negating the lethality of the shot. The 50 cal round was tapered to a fine point, meaning it did not have "spread", since that should have been negated by the shape of the round. The musket ball (not a 22 round), however, had the most surface area of the two and should have flattened on impact, but glided through easily. The statement of water being incompressible is false, and even professionals get that wrong so that can be waived due to misunderstanding the physics of water. Water is *relatively* incompressible. Forces of extreme pressure can compress it, turning the immediate surface into a solid barrier more powerful than concrete. Or, as seen in deep water compressing itself through extreme gravitational pressure, it can become dense enough to squish a submarine. Speed becomes crippling, in this regard. The faster the projectile, the less time water has to move out of the path, ergo compressing into a higher density, and thus shattering the faster, heavier, and pointier round while having almost no effect on the slow, lighter, completely spherical object.
Now a physics lesson in archery: with relatively equal equipment, say a heavy bow and one heavy, slower arrow and one lighter, faster arrow. The heavier arrow will have more penetration because it keeps a majority of its inertia at impact, which is essential for hunters as bone is often hit because there is extreme margin for error on shooting something with a skeleton and thick fur that can almost act like a gambeson (ancient cloth armor designed to hinder arrow penetration). A second video has equal arrows, but the faster the arrow due to the force of the bow, the more easily it shattered on impact, negating higher speed as remotely effective. There was one middle ground speed, where the slower one had less damage inflicted and the highest speed caused the arrow to break in half and not penetrate as deep as it could have. I would need to go back to it but I am quite sure there was damage to the broadheads, with higher speed causing more damage. The archer in question didn't use equivalent nor appropriate equipment for the circumstances, so the speed is the only factor that will be used here because it was the only consistency along with the same arrows/tips used. The previous video used the same bow but different speed/weights for the arrows but also needs more of a control as a basis.
The above paragraph was mostly aimed at this: "Not that any of what you said about aero shattering and stuff makes a bit of difference unless you're using a graphite arrow." The arrows weren't graphite, but the faster the projectile moved, the easier it shattered. Broadhead type may have made the difference. Bodkins are a special armor-piercing tip that's exaggeratedly pointy and release enough force at the tip to penetrate armor, then have enough weight in the heavier, slower arrow to make it continue moving. Failure to penetrate armor transfers the force through the armor, which will still cause serious pain and injury to the person wearing it. Higher speeds simply means the arrow makes it farther from the archer, enabling long-distance shooting. Extreme high-pound traditional bows are still obnoxiously slow compared to the faster arrows in an equal poundage compound of today shooting lighter arrows, but have been shown to be more deeply penetrating in field practice.
"If you use a heavy arrowhead relative to the shaft anyway and a light shaft " Please, never, ever, use a light arrow shaft in a traditional bow unless it's a pansy stick around 30#. In my years with watching novices choose archery equipment, I have seen people get the strength to use a higher-pound bow, then thinking high speeds were the meta of all stats to arrow force, use light shafts and either heavy or light broadheads...then end up in the emergency room with shards of arrow shaft sticking out of their hand/arm, missing fingers, punctured eye(s), etc. Higher poundage requires a shaft with a heavier grain (meaning a lower number--these are not baseline uniform and you need to discuss grain need for a traditional bow with an expert at the dealership or with the maker you get them from) and the head is somewhat important, with heavier broadheads being a bit deeper-penetrating than lighter. Shape of the broadhead matters more. Aluminum shafts and other bound materials can tend to let people get away with using shoddy arrows, but they are crippling their potential with using improper equipment.
"whatever it hits is going to achieve more penetration or at least knock it backwards farther because it's exhibiting more force on it" ...If your broadhead makes anything it hits move backward, you are using the wrong equipment. Force should never be expended into the target unless it's meant to stop an arrow, like archery butts and armor. Having a light shaft (which I explained is not a good idea) and a heavy head (which is negated because the light shaft has less inertia to push the broadhead forward after impact), does not mean better penetration; it will lose most of its force on impact.
Apologies for the extrapolation text wall, but being challenged on physics--especially archery--will bring out every expert archery book lining my bookshelf, especially the physics ones. Even the material the bow is made from affects the physics of archery.
@@Lycantis I'm calling bullshit on your whole statement. I don't believe a thing you wrote. And don't use big words if you don't know what they mean. There is no way that an arrow loses inertia when it hits a target. Seeing as inertia is the tendency for something to remain still or unchanged. If you had actually taken a physics class in high school, you would know that it might lose momentum. It might lose some velocity, but it is getting closer and closer to it's point of inertia. As soon as it stops it's inert. Maybe instead of typing mile-long TH-cam comments, you could actually go to school and learn the things that you're claiming to know. Community college is pretty fun. You can work live at home with Mom and Dad and still go to school and learn things.
Finally some real science!
loved it, so how about putting the head in full assault gear to see how it would do against a zombie from military!!
Brilliant
In Utah for this one.
never seen rick grimes shoot a 🏹 till now
REAL HOT STUFF.
Awesome🔥
Thanks 🔥
Love the channel...but hate wind noise. Been fighting it on my channel for years.
That's not a library book is it? Because they do that sometimes.
What was the draw weight of the bow. 70lb? Only takes 50lb to take down big game like Elk/Bears ect.
Some kid shredded elk ribs with a wimpy 30# so even those can be lethal if the archer is skilled enough with pansy sticks. The shot would have been even better had he not used cheap razor broadheads from Amazon or such. Good equipment makes all the difference.
Ted nugent bow is setup to 35lbs
Daryl say welcome to my lifestyle...
(FULLMAG) Here in Brazil a Korean killed a beggar with a cheap crossbow (made in china) with just one arrow, and it wasn't even in the head, the most impressive thing is that the Korean did it with one hand driving a car.
Wouldnt wanna be on a wrong side of this guy´s bow ;-)
Steve Martin wants his arrow back.
noticed the fieldtip/broadhead too .. ;)
Can you make a 5.56 turn into a broad head on your next video?
"BAM"
Very nice video. What manufacter and model of arrow is this? Thanks.
Need some noise cancelling, this is savage
No eye shot? 😳 Amateurs....
Those fireballs were cool tho. I mean hot.....
i use to throw a disposable propane bottle in the nest of yellowjacket wasps and shoot with a .22 cal but great fun was to throw the bottles into a fire and shoot with a .22!
Great vid
Cool
Pov: your playing sniper elite 4 with a bow
minute 6:04 shows a field tip, but minute 6:36 shows a broad-head. Two different shots I am assuming? Maybe the field-tip was just a practice shot?
Every real SF guy I've ever shot with always says the same thing. "Oh I could make that shot easily back in the day, but I don't know about now"
And then they proceed to group every weapon that gets put in their hands as tight as the weapon will allow. It's like they know they're the baddest of the bad, they just don't want to say it out loud. It's so awesome.
O.M.G 👍👍
Nice!
Get that book sign and give it away!
Why do I watch this from Australia, just to suffer?
What state is this shot in? Looking at the mountains in the background.
Boom. 💥
Hi guys, have you tested the Fenris reloading bow magazine yet?
who thinks we need more ballistic dummy videos