We built and flew a personal eVTOL in 8 months

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2023
  • We designed, built and tested this personal electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft in just 8 months. While this is a very early tech demonstrator, it gets us one step closer to our mission of redefining the joy of flight while minimizing the environmental impact of recreational aviation.
    We are now very excited to announce that we’re accepting reservations for our go-to-market product, the Spinner. The fully featured Spinner prototype will be unveiled in 2024.
    Learn more at upwardsaero.com

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @stomptheelites
    @stomptheelites 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Awesome. Many people are making these now, hope to fly one some day.

  • @AymanRacing
    @AymanRacing หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Can you please tell me what motors and escs you used for the build, it was pretty cool.

  • @airgunningyup
    @airgunningyup 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    the only reason we dont see more of these is the price of the controllers and motors.. some quick math says those alone are 6000 dollars, the props are another 1800 , so it gets expensive fast.

  • @krsonethegeneral6719
    @krsonethegeneral6719 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice! U did an awsome job that thing looks so cool i wanna fly it

  • @luiseduardojatarmontano1983
    @luiseduardojatarmontano1983 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hello can you tell me more about the control system you used, and how you tuned the PID parameters? Thanks, this is for my research

  • @kevinknight9994
    @kevinknight9994 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm having a hard time getting help with controls on my project. In specific getting my microcontroller which uses 2 joysticks to communicate with my Flight Controller. Obviously we don't want wireless but every schematic and bit of code uses radio, wifi or bluetooth..

  • @smeriglio84
    @smeriglio84 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great job!!!👍👍👍

  • @moineagu1
    @moineagu1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ❤❤❤ brilliant project congratulations ❤❤❤

  • @joemurak6171
    @joemurak6171 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    @upwardsaero wat kind of control system have used in this flying for altitude and direction Moto controling..

  • @givetanks
    @givetanks 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Not to bad! - but there is no redundancy - if you have a motor failure in flight yours screwed! may there is but is there gps lock to control hover and provide stable flight with accelerometer to counter bad pitch and roll?

  • @smallnuts2
    @smallnuts2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much power is each of those propellers have?

  • @thinkbeyond5360
    @thinkbeyond5360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yo I’m trying to build one could you help me out

  • @Empowerment2motivation
    @Empowerment2motivation 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how many cost this drone making go ????

  • @skylinefilmsbrasil9938
    @skylinefilmsbrasil9938 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice job, but redundancy needs to be applied by duplicating the number of motors in order to achieve a safety standard like e-hang has.

  • @motoflyte
    @motoflyte 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    There is a fundamental problem with all of these vehicles, no matter who has built them... If the engines stop, you fall to your death, killing anybody you land on. Even helicopters can autogyro. But these... You just fall straight down. We all know that these electrical systems are extremely reliable, but it doesn't change the certainty of death or extreme bodily harm. The only answer is to design a large light weight body in carbon fiber and reinforcing internal foam, so that the vehicle falls at a much slower rate.

    • @ddegn
      @ddegn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If multiple engines fail they're in a lot of trouble but a hexacopter can safely land with one engine out. The flight controller has to be programmed appropriately to do this but there are videos on TH-cam showing how a hexacopter can still fly even with one failed motor.
      There at least one thread on this topic in the ArduPilot forum.

    • @birbexe
      @birbexe 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      parachute.

    • @rowshambow
      @rowshambow 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Xpeng is already testing parachutes. It makes sense that all vtols will come with one. You should check out xpengs video

    • @smallnuts2
      @smallnuts2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@birbexe yep, if there is parachutes to let hols humvees beeing dropped , than this could work.

    • @jayesh5131
      @jayesh5131 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lil bruh never heard of parachutes!
      Also if you give them money they'll make the frame out of CF

  • @animerandom3041
    @animerandom3041 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Motor?
    ESC?
    Can you send me what's details of your project?

  • @FrankGonzalezIV
    @FrankGonzalezIV 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude your website doesn't work. How do I reserve one?

  • @upwardsaero
    @upwardsaero  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Here's a clickable link to our website: www.upwardsaero.com/

  • @TheBagOfHolding
    @TheBagOfHolding 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's good. Hang time, considering it's just as much or more than billion dollar companies can keep people in the air.

  • @Brad_Fallon
    @Brad_Fallon หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why is no one using Solid Hydrogen? A couple of small tanks of Magnesium Hydride MgH2 and you could fly it all week!

  • @rtanksley
    @rtanksley 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Incredible. There are companies that have spent $500mil and have not gotten as far as you have. Great work!

    • @pamirsevincel9118
      @pamirsevincel9118 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      not really. Building a prototype is 10% of the work. 90% is making it aviation-grade.
      While this is a great personal achievement, unfortunately it's a long and winding (and expensive) road to type certification.

    • @upwardsaero
      @upwardsaero  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are right about prototypes being 10% of the work, absolutely. And although there is still 90% of the work remaining to make it aviation-grade, since the Spinner is classified as a Part 103 ultralight it does not require type certification! Still a lot of work to be done, but not nearly as much as for a helicopter, or other certified aircraft @@pamirsevincel9118

    • @Brad_Fallon
      @Brad_Fallon หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@upwardsaero Think HYDROGEN!

  • @skyloveglobalnelsonbarbonc8009
    @skyloveglobalnelsonbarbonc8009 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ❤❤❤❤its globalskylove

  • @k311in
    @k311in 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bruh u guys seriously considering a 170k price tag? Lots of other more advanced evtols that travels longer ranges for same or cheaper

    • @Uncle_Fred
      @Uncle_Fred 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Or you can a used paramotor for 10k and get hours of manned flight.

    • @DaveSmith-cp5kj
      @DaveSmith-cp5kj 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Uncle_Fred The problem with a paramotor is that you don't have vertical takeoff and landing. So you need a fairly large plot of land to take off with a paramotor. That said, I do think incorporating a wing is the future for these kinds of personal manned aircraft. But the vertical takeoff is a necessary practical feature.