Top 10 INCREDIBLE Alternatives to Alternative ENERGY

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 150

  • @InquisMalleus
    @InquisMalleus 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are underwater turbines that work similar to wind turbines - except using ocean currents instead of wind. Because ocean currents are more stable than wind, they produce electricity much more consistently. Also, because water is more dense than air, a stable 5 mph current generates slightly more electricity than a 50 mph wind.

  • @bramboraail
    @bramboraail 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    awesome, the big wind turbines seem innocent, but these floating wind turbines.... super amazing. :}

  • @SpiritualInsanity01
    @SpiritualInsanity01 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I must admit that was jolly interesting. The topic matters on this channel can sometimes be a bit hit and miss, but in my opinion, that was one of your best videos. I do miss the intros before going through your list though, as it does set the scene for what is to come.

  • @CorkySchillinger
    @CorkySchillinger 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great video! Now, I just have to figure out a way to stay alive to see at least one of these technologies become common.

    • @Twasforthevine
      @Twasforthevine 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you were born after 1970 and live until 80 you should see it

  • @brokenursa9986
    @brokenursa9986 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've been working on a sci-fi thing, and my starships in it actually use those microwave thrusters as their maneuvering thrusters (they use stronger thrusters for acceleration and deceleration). Naturally, these ships have power-plants strong enough to actually make them give off a significant amount of thrust, and the ships are built with lightweight materials to get as much out of the thrusters as they can. I'm really trying to put the science back in science fiction.

    • @Digitizeddragon
      @Digitizeddragon 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      So cool. I love to write scifi as well. Really enjoy focusing on the idea of how different/similar alien cultures could be.

  • @Barskor1
    @Barskor1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Cold Steam the efficient way to use the sun or composting and rocket stoves as heat sources to produce electricity and or distilled water explained from basic concept to employment. Water boils in a vacuum at 75 F or 24 C
    Two open containers one full of water the other empty connect them at the bottom and water will reach an equilibrium 50 50. If one is sealed except for the connection the other will remain empty because of the vacuum created in the sealed container.
    Gravity will overcome this vacuum if the containers are taller than 34 feet.
    If the tanks are 40 feet tall the tanks will reach an equilibrium of water levels at 34 feet leaving six feet of hard vacuum in the sealed tank. This makes a vacuum pump set we need two of them if we were going to distill water as the cold side open tank is used to collect the distilled water from it as the continuous input of water needs to go somewhere.
    Each sealed tank has four valves three at the top two of those on opposite sides (B&C) one at the very top (D) one at the bottom on the side (A), water-based vacuum pump operations are, Close bottom tank valve A and top tank valve C. Open top tank valve D. Fill sealed tank through top side valve B. Close valve B and D when full. Open bottom valve A.
    This primes the system to let the warm water in that will vaporize and run through the system when you partially reopen valve B (to control flow rate) and open valve C to its fullest.
    For only power generation need one pump set and one vacuum tank so we can have a Hot side and a Cold side one to boil the water and one to have the low pressure/vacuum to draw the steam in through the turbine then the cooling coils then to the tank.
    At the bottom of the cold side, tank is a return pipe with the one way valve to the heat source the one-way valve prevents expansion back to the cold side and as the hot side vacuum chamber is the only outlet for the expanding water and it is drawn by the vacuum the cycle proceeds.
    You can combine the two and get power generation and distilled water keeping the return line from the power generation system will let you switch if you don't need distilled water on a continuous basis in large quantities.
    I am going to make one feel free to make one as well it is open source.

  • @Gguy061
    @Gguy061 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I need videos like this to give me hope

    • @josephorlando7601
      @josephorlando7601 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +NightRaven 1901 the thorium car is bullshit, the laser they use to heat it up uses more power than the heated thorium produces and is only operational in a lab, not to mention that it is a military laser designed to shoot down ICBMs.

    • @kevinlane1219
      @kevinlane1219 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try vsauce Mind Blow.

    • @Beening-wk8wl
      @Beening-wk8wl 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      *Free Energy Tips Click here to find out how you can save on your power billlll.>>**homesolarsystems.blogspot.hk** >>>*

    • @sierrapadilla808
      @sierrapadilla808 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is just superb, I have been researching "electrical design engineering books free download" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you ever come across - Senarper Salient Secret - (should be on google have a look ) ? It is a smashing one of a kind product for discovering how to have free power in your home minus the normal expense. Ive heard some decent things about it and my colleague got cool success with it.

    • @gustavocastroortiz7645
      @gustavocastroortiz7645 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cheers for this, I have been researching "how to make your own electricity with water" for a while now, and I think this has helped. You ever tried - Diyadison Penhloe Blaster - (do a google search ) ? It is a great one of a kind product for generating your own electricity minus the hard work. Ive heard some interesting things about it and my brother in law got excellent results with it.

  • @edwardlow9190
    @edwardlow9190 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Actually, the main problem isnt the temperature of a tokamak reactor, its the energy requred to start it compared to the energy given out. They have so far only managed to produce less energy than what has been put in. They are also using the deutriem tritium plasma to try to produce something i cant remember from the website

    • @edwardlow9190
      @edwardlow9190 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I remember, its called burning plasma, where the heat is confined inside the plasma well enough for the reactor to withstand the temperature. They also want to test tritium breeding, where tritium is actually created inaide the reactor, as there isnt enough tritium on earth at the moment to set up a meaningful number of tokomaks

  • @timhutzler9441
    @timhutzler9441 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Unlike the others the microwave thruster IS NOT an alternative energy source. It consumes LOTS of energy, and as you have mentioned it is not yet practical.

  • @LionIgnatius6205
    @LionIgnatius6205 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've wanted to say this for a while now ,your presentation skills are on point

  • @ariswitty99
    @ariswitty99 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Wendelstein 7-x would have been important to mention when talking about the ITER. Though a stellarator and not a tokamak, it is able to rotate the plasma without any need for additional power do to the twisting nature of its design.

  • @adriansykes4516
    @adriansykes4516 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a great post! Everyone, I would suggest you do more research on Thorium. Why are we not using it?

    • @michaelrudy8744
      @michaelrudy8744 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Adrian Sykes because ExxonMobil are dickheads.

  • @EclecticPkm
    @EclecticPkm 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Video Simon; Kudos to your team great work!

  • @Lemonz1989
    @Lemonz1989 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The thorium car is impossible in its current design unless you want to die of radiation poisoning just by driving it, not to mention the damage that would happen to everyone around it in a car crash. The design also wants to use a laser (that doesn't exist) to activate the nulear reaction, and the only current laser that can even activate the reation uses fuel that is rare in and of itself and it GIANT. If you could use that laser, then you wouldn't need the thorium to begin with, because you could just use that to heat the water...
    There is SOOO much wrong with it that it makes my head hurt.

  • @cfwolnia
    @cfwolnia 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ...steam generated at geo-thermo plants usually hovers around 158F... @ 4:37, Did I mishear this?

  • @Ascend777
    @Ascend777 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    LOL, looks like we will not have an energy crisis after all. We may however have transportation crisis.

  • @DJPrince2032
    @DJPrince2032 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really wish we would invest in schools and nuclear fusion funding more heavily. And before you cry to me because you read "nuclear" do more research then headlines, and more research than an article by a lady who makes claims about how many people Nuclear has killed even though her claims can't be independently verified. I think it would be the wisest move. And it's nuclear fusion I'm talking about, not fission. I think we need to get a fusion reactor up and commercially available by 2030 or sooner.

  • @corpsie666
    @corpsie666 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    MIT has recently found a way to boost solar panels efficiency above 30%

  • @acrefray
    @acrefray 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thorium reactors are easy to be created through the repurposement of Uranium reactors, but the pitfalls are that: A) Plutonium isn't generated, so various militaries aren't remotely interested (so there goes all the largest budgets), and B) The nuclear waste from Thorium has a half-life thousands of years greater than that of spent uranium.
    It's probably a better alternative, but as you well know, the militaries and mega-corporations of the world tend to determine what technologies get developed, and neither want to develop something that is not going to return a large, safe return on their investment.

  • @savagetaestheticknight221
    @savagetaestheticknight221 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍
    Alternative energy is the wave.

  • @hankw5086
    @hankw5086 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    great list; one of your best!

  • @jhoughjr1
    @jhoughjr1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The thorium car has been thoroughly debunked. Using a laser to hear water is idiotic.

  • @jordanzelch9508
    @jordanzelch9508 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For number one he showed two different reactors a breeder and a fusion reactor, then he acts as if they are the same thing

  • @paulbertrand8935
    @paulbertrand8935 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The microwave thruster isn't fringe science at all like it was presented here. The momentum of photons has been known for a hundred years thanks to Planks Constant. Solar sails work on the same principle

  • @millenniumspotm.g.sudarsanan
    @millenniumspotm.g.sudarsanan 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey what about Higgs boson energy ?

  • @chancegoss623
    @chancegoss623 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the solar windows, they would be cool in homes and other buildings.

    • @corpsie666
      @corpsie666 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except how hot the windows will be

  • @aultunwhite4988
    @aultunwhite4988 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't think this video was titled right....it should be called "Alternate modifications to alternative energy".....i think that''s more accurate...!!

  • @TheRealFobican
    @TheRealFobican 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    No wonder why electric cars are becoming more and more common these days, the technology to produce power is increasingly becoming more and more developed.

  • @MrKillerMichael
    @MrKillerMichael 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Number 3 and 2 are slightly different than the rest.
    The thorium reactor in a car is just stupid because of the radiation that would be emitted (and to mention the laser that heats the water instead of just putting the water around the reactor). A Thorium breeder reactor would be of much better use, but that would just end with nations claiming the other is trying to create a stronger nuclear weapon.
    The microwave engine doesn't actually break any physical law because electromagnetic radiation (light, although not always visible) doesn't have mass, but momentum. It doesn't have very much but it does have it. I believe someone calculated the energy required to launch a 100-ton spacecraft using only lasers and it was something like 11 million nuclear reactors.
    And not only that, but there are particles in space (with their respective antiparticle) that just come into existence. But since the anti-particle is nearby, they just annihilate. This may provide another reason of how the engine produces thrust (albeit at something like 10 micro newtons.)

  • @atzhirichavez2000
    @atzhirichavez2000 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:01, Why did they call it "Oyster"? Don't they know that's a type of shellfish?

  • @jackhenderson1039
    @jackhenderson1039 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    For #3 this has so many problems but.... It wouldn't run on 8 grams of fuel. You'd need to get more water.

  • @boxertest
    @boxertest 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loved this :-)

  • @RatOnDaKeys773
    @RatOnDaKeys773 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Put the solar windows in a ring around the earth

  • @gkwoolf1
    @gkwoolf1 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is truly amazing

  • @ceastin4935
    @ceastin4935 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know you've been watching or playing too many terraria mods when you hear thorium and the first thing you think of is the terraria mod.

  • @colonelautism9957
    @colonelautism9957 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What would happen if someone drank the energy virus spray?

  • @CUBETechie
    @CUBETechie 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about dual fluid reactors?

  • @PagoAoE2
    @PagoAoE2 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The ten people who disliked this video made their money with oil or coal and can't face the future!

  • @nil981
    @nil981 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    didnt thunderfoot already disprove two of the technologies on this list?

  • @nihonium
    @nihonium 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    that thorium car is a scan simulator.exe

    • @dylanracer195
      @dylanracer195 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      That car looks like back to the future and anime combined

  • @samgoode5305
    @samgoode5305 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    ummm. geothermal energy is already being used in my country for the last 50 years now. and is one of the main source of our electricity here.

    • @identitycrisis4557
      @identitycrisis4557 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where do you live?

    • @corpsie666
      @corpsie666 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is the heat from contact with hot solid rock or from liquid rock?

    • @samgoode5305
      @samgoode5305 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Jarvis Shroff philippines. why?

    • @samgoode5305
      @samgoode5305 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Corpsie probably silod rock near magma chambers

    • @identitycrisis4557
      @identitycrisis4557 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +sam goode Because if you lived in Turkey they wouldn't be using geothermal energy because there isn't any volcanosmthere. While living in a country on the ring of fire would make it easier to use and thus would be used more

  • @seanhartnett79
    @seanhartnett79 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    We should use BATs.

  • @yostepdaddi
    @yostepdaddi 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't wait until oil is obsolete

  • @on_another_level5661
    @on_another_level5661 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hearing you say Algae is torture.

  • @foppo100
    @foppo100 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let's have all this lot out quick and stop talking about it.Better solar wind and anything else what is available.Governments won't do it they only are interested in vested interest.It has to come from private entepreneurs to bypass the pay system.

  • @blaizegottman9359
    @blaizegottman9359 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    so maybe algae can be used to make oil

  • @Aeturnalis
    @Aeturnalis 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nuclear power IS clean (except for the nuclear waste), but producing nuclear fuel is extraordinarily polluting. Mining and refining uranium ore into a usable fuel requires incredible amounts of toxic chemicals including strong acids and other heavy metals, and a lot of energy input. You have to remember that the people who came up with these concepts in the 1950s were raised by the generation that used x-ray tanning beds and treated mental illness by using leeches to suck out your bad humors. It's way too dangerous to invest into any further.

  • @alonsovm2880
    @alonsovm2880 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ITER shouldn't be on this list, and nor even be 1#.

  • @colonelautism9957
    @colonelautism9957 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oil= weak, Hole in Ground + Sun =unlimited Power

  • @Peakock-0
    @Peakock-0 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm still waiting on a top 10 amazing people who wear / wore glasses

  • @Krom1hell
    @Krom1hell 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The "microwave thruster" is not against physics you silly fools.......You have to power it with something.......That something is not your dreams and hopes

  • @jacobwcrosby
    @jacobwcrosby 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually, the thorium engine is garbage, and so is the 'Impossible' drive, well, mostly anyway... The impossible drive has been attempted to be tested by NASA, but unfortunately, the thrust supposedly produced is so little that we lack the necessary instruments to measure it... In fact, the amount of time, money and energy spent in trying to adequately isolate the system from outside influence in order to accurately verify the supposed thrust is ridiculous! You folks really need to *actually* do research on these topics, instead of just reading some nonsense articles, wherein the writers themselves never did the necessary research... Sucks.
    Other than this video, for the most part, I *love* your videos/work!!!

  • @chrissoto7187
    @chrissoto7187 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Praise the sun !!!

  • @energynatures2007
    @energynatures2007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    في أفغانستان دبي إيران العراق السعودية الرياض دبي إيران العراق السعودية الرياض دبي إيران العراق السعودية الرياض دبي إيران العراق السعودية الرياض

  • @sourcastle
    @sourcastle 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    im a fan of nueclear energy just dont put were there is hurricans or floods okay

  • @fuzzy4461
    @fuzzy4461 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    They should call the next oyster oystermc oyster face

  • @Dman8s
    @Dman8s 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would geothermal suck the heat out of the earth and do something bad like that movie 'The Core 😳

  • @filippospano8447
    @filippospano8447 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    SOLAR FREAKIN' ROADWAYS!!

  • @xxilluminatixxxx
    @xxilluminatixxxx 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    That Thorium car was a lie.Debunked.

  • @kennethschultz2407
    @kennethschultz2407 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    R.I.T was mentioned. yaaay!

  • @geo3106
    @geo3106 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oldest video I’ve liked.

  • @osatoo98
    @osatoo98 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice

  • @bad71hd
    @bad71hd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Al gii?? The G is prominent.. al. Gee...

  • @Jfreek5050
    @Jfreek5050 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So, we've recently defied one of our so called "Laws,"
    Funny how much trust so many people put into science, isn't it?

  • @seanb3516
    @seanb3516 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The BetaRay is complete crap as well.
    I would suggest watching videos by Thunderf00t to learn the real science behind hi-tech BS.

  • @monsieur8433
    @monsieur8433 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just me or does some of these sound too good to be true

  • @sourcastle
    @sourcastle 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    its al geee

    • @sourcastle
      @sourcastle 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      not all gegee that makes you sound al gay

    • @sourcastle
      @sourcastle 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

  • @mikahjohn2809
    @mikahjohn2809 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't claim to be any kind of expert on this subject.. but the fact there are proven possibilities like these, some that have been around for years, and yet fossil fuels are still almost exclusively used, I find it infuriating that they are literally being rejected (or actively buried or slandered) just so the powers that be can keep making their trillions of dollars. I get it, you want to be super rich and control the world and the politics and power, but how insanely stupid and greedy and short-sighted do they have to be to still go through with it, knowing the damage it does to the planet and the people that live here? Lame.

  • @quantum7690
    @quantum7690 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    what about orgone

  • @happyandhealthy888
    @happyandhealthy888 ปีที่แล้ว

    international = new interplanetable

  • @mek86
    @mek86 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    No this is still producing electricity. What about alternative TO electricity ?

  • @BrianH1313
    @BrianH1313 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I live close enough to a Nuclear power planet that provides the power for my house. It is really cheap.

  • @eimantastomkevicius2685
    @eimantastomkevicius2685 ปีที่แล้ว

    The virus thing is matrix origin

  • @XmarkedSpot
    @XmarkedSpot 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Solar freaking thorium roadways!

  • @firstcynic92
    @firstcynic92 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Setting aside tragic accidents and the fact that it produces nuclear waste, this form of energy doesn't pollute the environment or cause any harm if we're careful."
    Did you hurt yourself jumping through that hoop? That's on the level of rationalization on par with "clean coal", "acceptable levels of lead in drinking water" or "guns don't kill".
    If you ignore accidents and pollution, coal and oil are perfectly ok as well.

  • @DakuHonoo
    @DakuHonoo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you screwed up with thorium and the numbers, it doesn't provide more energy but that doesn't matter

  • @not2busy
    @not2busy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wouldn't it be also be possible to harness or capture electricity delivered by lightning. If there are corridors where lightning strikes are more prevalent, couldn't we install lightning rods that would direct charges to giant capacitors buried in the earth?

  • @colonelautism9957
    @colonelautism9957 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    P O W E R!!!!

  • @maygayming5275
    @maygayming5275 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    for more info on the thorium powered car, see th-cam.com/video/568iDYn8pjc/w-d-xo.html

  • @darkmajick
    @darkmajick 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But money is longer lasting and more important than earth so none of these (especially the biofuel alternatives) will catch on.

    • @aaron4832
      @aaron4832 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      The sarcasm, it burns D=

  • @descooo2375
    @descooo2375 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You copied the daily conversation.

  • @Yalikejazzboi
    @Yalikejazzboi 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great he brought up the "thorium powered car" , guess I'm unsubscribing.

  • @masontaylor4884
    @masontaylor4884 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    no

  • @mrotola28
    @mrotola28 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    But fusion reactors have NEVER produces more energy than what is put in; ITERS claim sounds very skeptical to me.

  • @Hamsteak
    @Hamsteak 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    second

  • @thatoneguy33198
    @thatoneguy33198 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can't have a thorium car, you would get radiation poisoning.

    • @josephg.6116
      @josephg.6116 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      thatoneguy33198 that's not how that would work😥

  • @MrEricleblanc26
    @MrEricleblanc26 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fusion! The holy grail of energy sources! I don't think we'll see it in our lifetime 🙁