Dr. Subhash Kak: Vedanta, Consciousness and the e-Dimensional Universe | Abhijit Chavda Podcast 20

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 214

  • @jasminpatel3416
    @jasminpatel3416 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    Omg !!!! I cannot express in words how mindboggling, eye opening and curiosity inciting this was. I had a lot of questions which I got answers to but I'm now left with even more newer ones. So please invite Dr. Kak again, soon, Sir. Thank you very much, You're a channel for Prakasha itself for us!!!!!!

    • @JackSordakaPVS
      @JackSordakaPVS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      #SamePinch
      #whatjusthappened

  • @SonofSoma108
    @SonofSoma108 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I can hear Dr. Kak and Abhijit sir for days without getting bored. You two are my biggest inspiration to study science and our scriptures simultaneously

  • @p8895
    @p8895 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    The master AND the master's MASTER ! Many thanks 🙏

  • @satiready
    @satiready 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Our Ancients materialised this Theory through architecture. Our Temples ancient vaastu tries to replicate Cosmic geometry & arrangement of things just as how the universe is arranged. Even the rituals are arranged in such a way.

  • @Gen_7979
    @Gen_7979 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    0:26 Introduction
    01:20 On E- Dimensionality - What is it about and how he come up with it
    11:28 On Structure of Universe, Space and time, Spiral and Disc Galaxy and How E- Demensionality theory explains these.
    21:51 On Expansion of Universe, Dark Matter and Dark Energy in E- Dimensionality theory
    25:30 On How E-Dimensionality incorporated in Physics, Quantum mechanics, Quantum field theory.
    28:25 *Consciousness and Vedanta
    32:00 Mystery of Time and E-Dimensionality and how theory explains it. Indian Philosophy on Time
    39:18 On DNA and E-Dimensionality
    45:55 On Proof on Existence of God
    01:1:28 Mind, Brain and Consciousness, how they different and releted
    1:8:48 If we construct an artificial neural network that has more number of neural connections than the human brain, would it have a greater number of autonomous agents?
    01:13:00 On Why Consciousness doesn't attached itself with Computer
    1:16:00 Is AI will be Threat to humans
    1:23:15 What else Dr. Kak is working on
    1:25:46 How we can learn Vedanta
    1:27:00 Individual Consciousness
    1:27:24 Purpose of Life according to Vedanta

    • @ashwinbalasubramanian2669
      @ashwinbalasubramanian2669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Small e

    • @vbizind3687
      @vbizind3687 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks alot bud✺◟( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)◞✺

    • @utube9377
      @utube9377 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks 🙏 buddy …⁠ᘛ⁠⁐̤⁠ᕐ⁠ᐷ

    • @dupedandi
      @dupedandi ปีที่แล้ว

      For 1:27:00 please take realisation in sahaja yoga by Shree Mataji Nirmala Devi and feel kundalini on central nervous system ue consciousness!

    • @abhishek78887
      @abhishek78887 ปีที่แล้ว

      Abse koi daru nai mangeaega ganpat se. Bhai ne help kiya hai sab ko 😂😂

  • @danielnicholsen9334
    @danielnicholsen9334 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Very engaging conversation indeed Abhijit Sir!
    Anywhere you're involved, I'm there big brother🙏

    • @snozze77
      @snozze77 ปีที่แล้ว

      Who are you?
      Australian?

  • @BRBHARDWAJ
    @BRBHARDWAJ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Here comes my fav. Dr subhash.
    Thanks abhijit

  • @rajendraarora2429
    @rajendraarora2429 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Beautiful synthesis of e-dimensionality, vedanta and consciousness - rarest of the rare concepts! Thanks, Subhash ji.

  • @yashagrawal436
    @yashagrawal436 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    There is so much to learn from Dr Kak, and you as well Dr Chavda!

  • @priyankajaiswar3985
    @priyankajaiswar3985 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank u ac guruji and subash kak ji🙏🙏🧡🧡

  • @holeesheet8582
    @holeesheet8582 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    These are the podcasts we need in India.... I came to know about Dr. Kak in the lockdown period and I was blown away by the amount of knowledge this man has..... And as always Abhijit you have asked amazing set of questions....Thankyou to you two....

  • @TarunKhatri47
    @TarunKhatri47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +148

    It looks weird when Abhijit sir ask questions instead of answering them

    • @RampadaV
      @RampadaV 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      😅 exactly

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      #askabhijit
      Gravity do not exist as what NASA scientist tells us, it is actually mixture of buoyancy and density.
      Hindi 'गुरुत्वाकर्षण' is not same as English gravity which space organisation tells us, it is actually attractive towards guru element.

    • @rahulpandey-pe2wt
      @rahulpandey-pe2wt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha good one bro 😀😀

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      #askabhijit
      Earth is flat.
      Hindi and Vedic cosmology doesn't go in sync with modern space science cosmology, they are lying to us right from our childhood.
      In Vedic cosmology it is mentioned that that there are 14 planes and earth plane is in middle.
      Whole of space is fake, that scientist temperament is needed and some research. And yes, I would shakle your knowledge right from your core.

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      #askabhijit
      th-cam.com/video/STfsleffkms/w-d-xo.html
      How nasa fools us. As a teacher you should see all views.

  • @ShahanshahShahin
    @ShahanshahShahin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Love to see you both again; you two are my favorites. What a mind-blowing session.

  • @manojchand4006
    @manojchand4006 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is brilliant, it questions a lot of Why ? Of our life. It's sad that we are not learning Sanskrit and our Vedas, what more sad is that we don't have enough people who can interpret the Vedas the way Dr Subhash kak does. It simply amazing, I'm so grateful to Abhijit sir for bringing him on this platform.

    • @desicat3563
      @desicat3563 ปีที่แล้ว

      A conspiracy to suppress Bharat and plagiarise the material and use people to work for them & glorify westerners.

  • @parashararamesh4252
    @parashararamesh4252 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Would also request the editors and Abhijit to make it into byte sized clips similar to other geopolitical videos for easier consumption 🙏

  • @nanamirge
    @nanamirge ปีที่แล้ว +1

    महाशय मेरे पास शब्द नही है किस प्रकार से आपका आभार व्यक्त करू... ये जो आप ने किया है...👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳👏👏👏👏👏

  • @ht9569
    @ht9569 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Long time fan and follower of Dr. Kak. Immense intellect and clarity of thought! What made this podcast so good were your excellent questions. Thank you for this fascinating podcast!

  • @sumitaggarwal6653
    @sumitaggarwal6653 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Interesting podcast. Abhijit sir, please conduct next podcast with J SAI DEEPAK 🙏👍

  • @gooddayok
    @gooddayok ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Professor Kak is Worthy of Several Nobel Prizes

  • @ajitkumarsahu2733
    @ajitkumarsahu2733 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This pod cast Evoke curiosity in e dimensions. Thank you for a such a wonderful enlightening time.

  • @mateo4411
    @mateo4411 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Reading the articles alongside this Interview has been an eye opening experience. Great video, I would love to see you interviewing people of this caliber more often. Thank you.

  • @rajasimav1474
    @rajasimav1474 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Audio visual treat from Dr Subhash Kak sir.
    Abhijit sir is the best host possible....gives the floor fully open to the guest without interfering or giving directions to Dr Kak sir.

  • @pulkitgupta9085
    @pulkitgupta9085 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    what a magical and mindboggling podcast this was.... thank you so much Abhijit 😊
    Jai Shree Ram ❤

  • @ashishtripathi5258
    @ashishtripathi5258 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This video must be shown in ncrt program. Especially in doordarshan.

  • @kushal427
    @kushal427 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What a brilliant conversation!!!

  • @sachin9131
    @sachin9131 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great podcast👏 Subhash Ji is an institution. Guru ji it would be great to hear You and Praveen Mohan together. Please make it possible 🙏

  • @Haridarshann
    @Haridarshann ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Whatever you think, what ever you feel, whatever you are, in the end rather start. You shell reach the ऊॅं
    No matter who you are.
    Har har Mahadev 🙏

  • @arweyn1
    @arweyn1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    There are no words to express what I experienced absorbing this "conversation" which is a revelation. It moved my very core and some of the perspectives were made available to my mind by closing my eyes and "seeing". Dr. Kakji, I am an ardent fan of your albiet with limited mental capabilities - I am just able to read/listen and not evaluate critically. Abhijitji, I always marvel at the level of depth your questioning is done - to illuminate the subject of discussion. My pranaams to you both and dhanyavaadah. Om Shri Gurubhyo Namah.

  • @majorsingh6468
    @majorsingh6468 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What a session. Thanks for such intellectually stimulating talk

  • @p8895
    @p8895 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Super heavy, will have to relook at least 10 times🙏

  • @karmacore13
    @karmacore13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dr. Kak is a Maha Rishi ! Gave words to what we have experienced. 🙏

    • @Delhi_Guy
      @Delhi_Guy ปีที่แล้ว

      Usne kya bola zara samjhana. He is spitting gibberish making absolutely no sense at all.

    • @siddarthshah1773
      @siddarthshah1773 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Delhi_Guyhuh well the same thing was written by your osho in his books😂 do get a hand on them.. btw shiva 112 vigyan bhairav tantra is a knowledge of our access to space time continuum.. as i said you can have a read

  • @JackSordakaPVS
    @JackSordakaPVS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There was so much to absorb, and I was saturated in 30 minutes. Really took me 3 days to complete this! And highlights that I remember at present that shook my brain stem:
    1. Consciousness is intertwined with everything (mind blown)
    2. Mind and consciousness are not the same thing
    3. Brain is just a machine that consciousness is enabling/monitoring/overlooking
    4. We humans have strong desires to associate with stories
    Seriously, I need better work from my grey matter just to watch it again some fine day! 🙏🏼

  • @ToobMee
    @ToobMee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    These talks should be the fodder in schools and colleges, but who can make that happen?

  • @budhagudhamoos5636
    @budhagudhamoos5636 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Abhijit sir ....Loved this EPISODE....hope we get 2 see u both Again 🙌🙌👏

  • @alankritadas1153
    @alankritadas1153 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Abhijit Sir for bringing Subhash Sir on your podcast.

  • @apna_divyam
    @apna_divyam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Watched the whole thing.
    I am so amazed I is of words. Don't know what to write in this comment.
    I am into Deep learning and nural networks. So I understood a lot of it.
    I think now I have to pull up Vedanta and applied mathematics.
    Missed such an episode from a long time.
    Thank you both.

  • @rishikeshshete3807
    @rishikeshshete3807 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This one is a masterblaster episode for me! Loved it thoroughly!! Thank you sir for hosting such luminaries ❤

  • @ritesh.prakash
    @ritesh.prakash ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So, the Brain is unconscious, is like the computer or an instrument and does not have the power of Will! It is the atman who is us and which has the power of will and knowledge and it is conscious and hence we are conscious!! 🤩 So so Exciting!!!!

  • @sparklinglotus
    @sparklinglotus ปีที่แล้ว

    Great and on-point questions by Chavda ji and respect to Kak ji for his wide knowledge of the sources of ancient Indian wisdom (which the sages of those times acquired and shared with the world in the pure pursuit of the knowledge of reality and understanding of consciousness) that he employs for his arguments and ideas, but his answers are circumlocutory, seem to be based on a needs-driven conceptual concoction that can only be called messy and are not at all convincing in any way. The answer about the proof of existence of God, especially, is a lot of fluff made to seem like some deep discovery. Also, he almost admitted here that he meant "proof of existence of god" as a personal joke that he pulled on people. Interesting!

  • @y_k3096
    @y_k3096 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    0:26 Introduction
    1:20 You have a number of papers on the e-dimensional theory of the universe. Could you explain what this theory is about? What was the thought process that made you discover this?
    11:30 You have also shown that fractional dimensionality affects the large scale structure of the universe. Very early galaxies that are disk shaped, are they not explained by e-dimensionality?
    21:50 Is the e-dimensional nature of the universe responsible for the expansion of the universe? What are the implications of e-dimensionality for dark matter and dark energy?
    25:35 How do we incorporate e-dimensionality in quantum mechanics? Could we have e-dimensional versions of Maxwell’s equations or Schrödinger equation?
    32:01 Is there any way we can throw some light on the mystery time through the e-dimensionality theory?
    39:18 What are the implications of e-dimensional theory to the structure of DNA?
    45:55 Now lets talk about the other 2 papers, the limits of machine consciousness and the number of autonomous cognitive agents in a neural network. What are these papers about? And how does this prove the existence of God?
    1:01:27 Why does consciousness reside in the brains, in biological structures? Why not in rocks and pebbles?
    1:08:48 You have demonstrated that the number of autonomous agents in a neural like the human brain is 25. If we construct an artificial neural network that has more number of neural connections than the human brain, would it have a greater number of autonomous agents?
    1:12:59 A consciousness attaches itself to a human brain when it is born. Why does a consciousness not attach itself with a computer?
    1:16:20 What if we create an AI which exactly mimics human behaviour, the so-called philosophical zombie, can that be a threat to humans in the future?
    1:23:34 What else are you working on? What research papers can we expect from you in the coming months?
    1:25:46 How can one learn vedanta from the basics? Why is it not so accessible like the other western and eastern schools of thought?
    1:26:59 Isn’t the consciousness of individuals different in nature?
    1:27:24 What is the purpose of life according to vedanta?
    1:28:20 Conclusion.

  • @enjoyparents
    @enjoyparents ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow shubhash Kakji is such a fantastic scientific research explanation 💐👍💐👍💐👍

  • @apna_divyam
    @apna_divyam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Abhijit sir remember one episode we were discussing about what Krishna said
    Yada yada he dharmasya
    Glanir bhavti Bharat
    You said Bharat mens just Indian (not the rest of the world)
    I had difficulty digesting it
    Today Dr. Kak explained the real meaning of Bharat
    Anyone can be Bharat irrispective of there race or anything.
    Now 😃
    Jai Hind

    • @apna_divyam
      @apna_divyam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nayan7207 here you go
      th-cam.com/video/xXEqUviuzpI/w-d-xo.html

    • @apna_divyam
      @apna_divyam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's ok to make mistakes all of us make mistakes. Sir did it too.
      It's how we learn.
      Or
      May be this still is a topic of debate
      Let's see between Abhijit sir and Subhash sir

    • @apna_divyam
      @apna_divyam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nayan7207 Just let me know if you watched it

    • @apna_divyam
      @apna_divyam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nayan7207 🙏 डेढ़ सौ रुपए लेगा

    • @atheist8890
      @atheist8890 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bharat refers to Arjun(descendant of Bharat dynasty) not India or any region.

  • @crazyrebel7406
    @crazyrebel7406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    May be new ideas emerges in mind is when we tune our brain to certain frequency or certain pattern(constantly thinking or working on certain concepts) which unlocks information their out in the universe already in codified form.

  • @alok2020
    @alok2020 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow, simply awesome🙏

  • @viwaanrockzz6912
    @viwaanrockzz6912 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mind blastic episode & information...grand salute for both of you sir❤

  • @Just_forfun9140
    @Just_forfun9140 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My observation is that things (concepts) work in a similar fashion in different realms. For example, how planets revolve around sun, and in turn revolves around something else, and so on. What is interesting is at the atomic level, electrons are revolving around nucleus, its like planets revolving around sun.
    Even Karma is similar to the fundamental law in physics: every action results in equal and opposite reaction.
    In biological terms, a cell is structured like an atom, there is a nucleus, cell wall, and mitochondria, and other things are in action moving around.
    And there is polarity, (+) and (-), like duality, male, female.
    This is like spiral structures he was talking about, also in DNA.

  • @jupiterkumar1
    @jupiterkumar1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who knew when COVID happened, there was another discovery which will be bigger than the pandemic in phenomena with seemingly implication on everything we knew and perceived about physics. Looking forward to hear Mr. Kak share his interpretation of integral yoga to bring forth what Sri Aurobindo stated as supramental consciousness. Can this be one of the e-dimensions? If yes, what kind of an organization/pattern was it?

  • @jsg2196
    @jsg2196 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do regular Weekly Podcast,
    I'd prefer at every Saturday Night...❤️❤️

  • @GK-gs1ke
    @GK-gs1ke 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks 🙏

  • @kunal.....
    @kunal..... 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Congratulations 🎉 for 500k Subscribers....

  • @rahul.parmar
    @rahul.parmar 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh this definitely answers so many questions, I mean I just imagined that how the numbers between 0 and 1 behaves differently when multiplied and how fractional behaves when multiplied are just two amazing things that resolves my confusion about how can micro and macro universe laws could be so much different still they are the 2 sides of one coin!🙏

  • @theybecameus
    @theybecameus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow. going to buy some book from dr. Kak from amazon

  • @amitk79
    @amitk79 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    He is right. What separates us from machines a good example is boredom. We are conscious hence we get entertained or bored. Create what machine you may like, neither it will yearn for entertainment or joy nor will it get bored of repetition.

    • @amitk79
      @amitk79 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Again you can program computer to get bored but it again will be mechanical. He can’t chose from when he can get bored.

  • @anjani_tiwari
    @anjani_tiwari 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Most amazing podcast.

  • @giftsenpai
    @giftsenpai 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Will relisten very carefully....tomorrow

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      #askabhijit
      Earth is flat.
      Hindi and Vedic cosmology doesn't go in sync with modern space science cosmology, they are lying to us right from our childhood.
      In Vedic cosmology it is mentioned that that there are 14 planes and earth plane is in middle.
      Whole of space is fake, that scientist temperament is needed and some research. And yes, I would shakle your knowledge right from your core.

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      #askabhijit
      th-cam.com/video/STfsleffkms/w-d-xo.html
      How nasa fools us. As a teacher you should see all views.

    • @giftsenpai
      @giftsenpai 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wow, i got a heart from Sir ..😊😊😊

    • @giftsenpai
      @giftsenpai 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Rahul-Jain ever thought of 14 planes as dimensions,,, and all existing at same place at same time...and we just being able to perceive the earth..and other planes aka dimensions locked to us😶🙃🙃

    • @AbhishekKumar-gz8lp
      @AbhishekKumar-gz8lp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@giftsenpai Bhai he is a spammer

  • @harshsinghania6636
    @harshsinghania6636 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a fabulous conversation!! It was unintentionally spiritual. But science can evolve only through spirituality, just like time and space extend using sound.
    Can sound be the cause of creation of dimensions? Or is it the dimensions itself? Similar to the cosmic dance of Shiva and his damru producing the shabd.

  • @montuedge
    @montuedge 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only few minutes in and I am hooked

  • @RajendraVenkata
    @RajendraVenkata 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic!!!!

  • @facesbykusuma
    @facesbykusuma 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating conversation

  • @2202Utkarsh
    @2202Utkarsh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If the life cycle of the whole universe is circular and life is repeating itself over and over again then the main question that intrigues me a lot is what is the way to get out of this circular loop or if we are in this circular loop then i am going to repeat the same good deeds or the mistakes that i have done during my lifetime will also repeat??

    • @Just_forfun9140
      @Just_forfun9140 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No you don't repeat same mistakes in next life, you may make new mistakes, and learn from by experiencing the mistakes you made in previous life.

  • @dharmverma7595
    @dharmverma7595 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr. Kak when you say that when we learn we lose neurons that is not really not correct. When we are born the brain has fully developed neural connections for certain functions such as breathing and other important survival functions. But other areas are not. For example one of the first to develop is visual cortex. Here the neurons start extending and developing synapses based on the input from the infants eyes. Similarly as we grow and learn different things, the corresponding parts of the brain develop more and more efficient neural synapses. When we are involved in the practice of a certain activity, whether it may mathematics or playing basketball,the parts of the brain responsible for those respective activities become more and more firm and efficient;so much so that it becomes ‘ intuitive’. The parts of brain that are not being used become less and less active and atrophied. This is called ‘ pruning ‘. Remember, the Nature always tries to be most efficient that it can for a certain task to conserve energy. Therefore the neurons are dying because of this pruning effect and after 8 or 10 years of age. Only if somebody would find a way to educate the children with all the knowledge so efficiently before the age of 10 that we can avoid pruning, our consciousness would have a super brain at its disposal to interact with physical reality and understand it deeply. This country is destroying it’s youth and their brains ( the most powerful computer ,which we have the capability to produce) on one hand, and trying to construct artificial intelligence which I doubt, could reach the level of intuitive capabilities of our brains. An stupid AI could be more dangerous to humanity!

  • @dupedandi
    @dupedandi ปีที่แล้ว

    Consciousness is the feeling (on central nervous system) when kundalini rises n crosses sahasrar! ... N hence once connection to the all pervading power.... Which is a bigger consciousness

  • @Chryso5
    @Chryso5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank you for the amazing session sir

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      #askabhijit
      Gravity do not exist as what NASA scientist tells us, it is actually mixture of buoyancy and density.
      Hindi 'गुरुत्वाकर्षण' is not same as English gravity which space organisation tells us, it is actually attractive towards guru element.

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      #askabhijit
      Earth is flat.
      Hindi and Vedic cosmology doesn't go in sync with modern space science cosmology, they are lying to us right from our childhood.
      In Vedic cosmology it is mentioned that that there are 14 planes and earth plane is in middle.
      Whole of space is fake, that scientist temperament is needed and some research. And yes, I would shakle your knowledge right from your core.

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      #askabhijit
      th-cam.com/video/STfsleffkms/w-d-xo.html
      How nasa fools us. As a teacher you should see all views.

    • @agfhj875
      @agfhj875 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hindus were clear that earth is sphere and referred geography as bhugol from thousands of years,some references: Markandey puran 54.12 states "the earth is low in South and North,it is highly elevated in middle", Yoga Vashishta verses 3.30.12 & 3.30.13 mentions that humans and animals walking on earth is akin to ants crawling on a ball ,Aitereya Bhraman 3.44 tells how night is due to opposite effect to sun..like these many..Even earth is shown as sphere when the varaha avatar of vishnu hold earth

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@agfhj875 First of all In your whole life you have never research anything about global earth model, you have just read science books in your school and colleges written by some so called scientist and believed whatever has been told to you by scientist and the photographs by space organisation and with todays technology it is even possible to create those images with CGI, you are just science believer and do not have a scientific temperament.
      Even science is become a new religion, ever wondered why people says I believe in science. Science is based on reality of universe in which we are in and experimentation not on believing.
      However the one with scientific temprament do not criticize other person view like this the way you told me, it just shows your inability to stand on a ground by just making a fo*ol out of me.
      Scientific person always work on increasing his perception about reality and think from every angle. why on earth there are million of people who say with their own research that the shape of earth is flat maybe they are wrong but they are the person who really research and go deep into that model they are not just saying anything in the air. just give yourself a chance to explore other reality and it may also be possible that your whole life you are programmed to just believe a lie.
      The problem is not you infect the problem is that all of the environment around you be it offline or online right from birth be it school or colleges or even after that it is just organized in such a way that any person who give you alternate view is being ridiculed and made a joke out of him and to just let him down every time so that only lie pervades the truth.
      And you don't even know Who are the people that secretly control the world and selling you lie in every sector of your life.
      Namaskar🙏

  • @atulsohal1234
    @atulsohal1234 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Abhijit Chavda Sir, how about if we do a 'pran-pratishtha' of a neural network.. just like we do it for Murtis and Yantras, will that make them conscious / self-aware?

  • @atulsohal1234
    @atulsohal1234 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Abhijit Chavda @Subhash Kak:
    Sir, what if 'pran-pratishtha' of a neural network is done.. just like we do it for Murtis and Yantras, will that make them conscious / self-aware ?
    Or if any ghost makes a connect with the neural network?

  • @dupedandi
    @dupedandi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Einstein said when he found the theory of relativity- it dawned upon me from a tortion area.

  • @bhairavinadgonde6400
    @bhairavinadgonde6400 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @nandansavant2492
    @nandansavant2492 ปีที่แล้ว

    Deep deep deep. 🙏

  • @parashararamesh4252
    @parashararamesh4252 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really mind bending stuff, the only question I have to quote the band "Queen"
    Is this the real life?
    Is this just fantasy?

  • @vanillagorilla.
    @vanillagorilla. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    #Ask#Abhijit Sir I saw some people saying that the kingdome of Vikramaditya, which some of us believe was one of India's biggest kingdom, didn't exist. And some of them also say it existed but was small and was not even bigger than the main land India today. Please clearly this sir.

    • @AJAYSINGH-ns1vv
      @AJAYSINGH-ns1vv ปีที่แล้ว

      I am from mp And it definitely exist and he ruled all over India Pakistan nepal Bangladesh except deep south in some part of Tamilnadu. He even defeated arab kings and there a poet of arab wrote poems in his praise which is now in Turkish library and he defeated roman king also.

    • @vanillagorilla.
      @vanillagorilla. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AJAYSINGH-ns1vv Where's the reference? Because everyone keeps on saying yes his empire was this big this from here to here but nobody give proofs and refrence for the same.

  • @TarunKhatri47
    @TarunKhatri47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    #askabhijit what books are you reading?

  • @agadurapparamachandra8291
    @agadurapparamachandra8291 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shiva is
    Pure Conciousness
    Witness
    Atman
    Cosmic Intelligence
    Non material
    Sarvantaryami
    AdiAnanta
    All pervading existing reality,
    Stationary,
    and
    Where as Shakti {Devi}is Energy
    Matter {gross and subtle}
    Materialexistence
    Shiva and Shakti are embedded with each other,
    One is not with out the other,
    Shiva and Shakti are inseparable Realities.
    Sri OM Sri

  • @riyanath1858
    @riyanath1858 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, please do more poscasts on science.

  • @Tanuj_Pokhriyal
    @Tanuj_Pokhriyal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    #AskAbhijit Sir why Nepal and Sri-lanka are not integeral part of india?

  • @tanmaysingh3675
    @tanmaysingh3675 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir ji... how do we visualize e dimensions

  • @Tanuj_Pokhriyal
    @Tanuj_Pokhriyal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    #AskAbhijit Sir POK integration? when?within this decade or century?

  • @VivekRC
    @VivekRC 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow!

  • @truthseeker7297
    @truthseeker7297 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If one logically thinks step by step, then on scientific basis both "1 God" claim of abrahmics & "0 God" claim of atheists are impossible & only Advaita (nonduality) described by Sanatan Dharma i.e Hindutva holds true. Here is my reasoning:
    "1 God" claim of abrahmics says that an uncreated conscious source referring to itself as "1 true God" created us i.e. created our consciousness. But this means that consciousness can be created which in turn contradicts the claim of that "1 true God" being the uncreated conscious source since "his" consciousness then must also have been created and thus we enter into an infinite regression in which no conscious entity can claim to be the creator of other conscious entities thus destroying the claim of that "1 true God" & abrahmics.
    "0 God" claim of atheists says that there is no conscious source. This means insentience is at the core but this means that in absence of any trigger and any material, absolutely no movement is ever possible in infinite emptiness and since all fundamental particles are vibrations or movement in infinite emptiness, none of them should ever exist let alone their combination (like brain) accidently producing consciousness. But as per atheists insentient matter, whose source is not known & which should not even exist, intelligently organises itself as universe and then intelligently assembles itself into various species with reproductive capabilities and only after all this intelligent organization in those species, consciousness suddenly sparks as an emergent property. Since intelligence is a property of consciousness hence if we scrutinise atheists' arguments then intelligence is preceding consciousness, which is laughable. This destroys the argument of atheists.
    Now as per western logic these are the only two possibilities and based on these two they have their left wing and right wing politics too. But we have rejected both as shown above. So there must be something wrong with western logic and there is indeed. "1 true God" and "0 God or no conscious source" are not the mutually exhaustive possibilities. The correct mutually exhaustive possibilites are "no conscious source" and "conscious source". Thus though we have completely rejected the possibility of "no conscious source" but so far we have only rejected the abrahmic claim from the possibility of "conscious source" which means if we want to know the nature of conscious source and its relation to us and matter then we will have to dig deeper as the abrahmic claim of "1 true God" doesn't have any truth in it.
    So lets dig deeper by analysing the brahmand(universe) we live in. We live in a brahmand of dvait(duality) i.e. purusha[subject/observer] and prakriti[object(matter)/observed] i.e. we see things that are different from us and this phenomenon of me and others (other subjects as well as objects) is known as dvait. Now since we have just proven that there is a conscious source then why that conscious source didn't think that there is a higher consciousness just like we think? The only logical answer to this must be that contrary to our observation of dvait, it did not see anything or anyone which was different from it i.e. for which it itself was not the trigger and the material cause both. So when it saw something or someone, it itself was that something and someone and when it saw nothing, then it itself was nothing i.e. complete stillness/emptiness. In essence whatever it thought it became i.e. Drishti-Srishti. Essentially what we have just proven is that the source consciousness is infinitely pervading and infinite potential shakti (energy) that is self aware and thus can manifest itself in infinite forms i.e. mathematically speaking Shunya(0)=Purna(∞). We have also proven that since you can't create or destroy absolute emptiness, hence this self aware infinite potential energy that Hindus refer to as Brahman is neither created(ajanma) nor can be destroyed(avinashi) & is thus timeless(anaadi). This state is also desireless because since there is nothing different from it hence there is nothing to desire for. Thats why renunciation or freeing the mind of desires is used as one of the methods to achieve this non dual desireless state or Moksha. This is the paramarthik satya of Advaita that Adi Shanakaracharya described in his work. Now the next question is that how from this state of Advaita the emergence of dvaita happens.
    Dvaita means that there is an observer which thinks that there is something different from it. Thus the observer will need to be limited in order for other entities to exist. But since Brahman(source consciousness) is infinite & advaita (i.e. no difference between subject and object) and thus there can be nothing else apart from it hence the only way to manifest such a limited observer is when Brahman limits itself under self imposed avidya of having limited energy and creates an illusion of dvaita for that limited observer. Now since we have already proven that Brahman is advaita and thus ananta/avyaya(infinite), ajanma(uncreated) and avinashi(can never be destroyed), how many such limited observers (limited conscious energy) can it manifest? The answer obviously is potentially infinite. Now we can relate this to the Purnamadah Purnamidam shloka from the Ishavasya Upanishad.
    Now since purusha and prakriti are the only manifested entities in the universe, this means that the trigger and material cause for both must be Brahman(source consciousness) only. This implies that from Brahman's point of view it is advait (nondual) with both purusha and prakriti and purusha and prakriti are nothing but its anshik (fractional) manifestations only [Gita chapter 10/Gita 15.7]. Thus purusha is not something different from Brahman and thus purusha is nothing but a localized/limited manifestation of Brahman and the only possible reason that would make purusha think that prakriti is different from it, must be because of the self imposed avidya(ignorance) without which the maya (illusion) of duality cannot happen. In essence what we have proved is that this brahmand is simply a simulation of dvait and thus is only a VYAVAHARIK SATYA (empirical/relative truth) and not PARAMARTHIK SATYA (absolute truth). Also it is because of this dvait, vasanas(desires) originate in the mind of purusha as the vasanas are nothing but our effort to acquire or avoid an entity that is different (i.e. dvait) from us. Thus to fulfil those desires based in dvait, purusha (only nimitt karan and not upadan karan) gets bound to prakriti & takes rebirths and gets caught in the karmic cycle(mental & physical actions) or sansara. This also proves that unless purusha realizes that it itself is the infinite desireless state of advaita or Brahman (upadan and nimitt karan both), vasanas will always arise in purusha, as the root of vasanas is in dvait and the root of dvait is in self imposed avidya. Thus purusha will always take punarjanma(rebirth) to fulfill those vasanas and the punarjanmas will happen in various yonis (species) and in various lokas based on its gunas (sat, raj or tam) and karma. The law of karma here is the only fair rule that can be used in dvaita as all purushas are nothing but a limited version of Brahman under self imposed avidya and thus Brahman has no reason to favour or detest any purusha and thus what any purusha gets (good or bad results) must only be based on its own current & prior actions (including those of previous births) [Gita 9.29].
    This is the level of vyavaharik satya where the dvait of not only purusha and prakriti but also of purusha and Brahman (in unmanifest or in infinite manifest forms) is true where purusha is the KARTA and Brahman is the SAKSHI & KARMAFALA DAATA. This matches with the two bird analogy of Adi Shankaracharya. But once the desires & karma is dissolved and avidya is removed by conscious efforts of purusha, the maya(illusion) of a separate identity or dvaita is dissolved and purusha(atman/limited & localized consciousness) merges back into Brahman(Absolute or infinite consciousness). This merger is called Moksha/Nirvana/Kaivalya etc and the process of merger is known as Yoga (To unite/join/merge with the absolute truth i.e Brahman).
    Shri Krishna says the same in Gita and Vidyagita chapter of Tripura Rahasya (often quoted by Bhagwan Ramana Maharshi) makes it absolutely clear. Modern science has also realized this in half when it says that energy can neither be created nor destroyed. All is left for science to understand is that energy (referred to by Hindus as Brahman) is also conscious/selfaware, is the basis of all motion and manifestations & thus can manifest itself in infinite forms. Hindus call this infinite conscious energy or Brahman in its potential state as Shiva and in kinetic state (as brahmand i.e. manifested universe) as Shakti. Upanishads confirm this and Shri Krishna also says the same in Gita chapter 10.
    Shiva (infinite conscious energy appearing as emptiness/stillness i.e consciousness not showing any signs of motion) and Shakti or Shiva's dance (infinite conscious energy appearing as brahmand/prakriti i.e. consciousness with motion) appear to be different to purusha (limited conscious energy) only at the level of vyavharik satya because of self imposed avidya of having only limited shakti (limited energy). At the paramarthik level, Shiva and Shakti are the same i.e. Brahman (infinite conscious energy)=Shiva=Shakti as depicted in the Ardhanarishwar rupa in Sanatan Dharma/Hindutva.

  • @thatguywithm
    @thatguywithm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Somebody do the timestamps please!

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      #askabhijit
      th-cam.com/video/STfsleffkms/w-d-xo.html
      How nasa fools us. As a teacher you should see all views.

  • @harshbehl4
    @harshbehl4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jai Shri Ram

  • @anexcitedscienceuser9047
    @anexcitedscienceuser9047 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:24:00

  • @aayush007
    @aayush007 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Goldmine

  • @kunal.....
    @kunal..... 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Timelines ?

  • @AshokKSingh82
    @AshokKSingh82 ปีที่แล้ว

    Abhijeet Sir can I put Hindi version of your videos in a new TH-cam channel? I will make sure dubbing is done proper and you can review it as well before we release it.

  • @dupedandi
    @dupedandi ปีที่แล้ว

    What about kalateet ... Beyond time concept

  • @ANZAC362
    @ANZAC362 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    WHEN CAN NOT ACCEPT THE TRUTH THEN YOU CAN NOT DENY THE FALSE
    जब सत्य को स्वीकार नहीं कर सकते तो असत्य को नकार नहीं सकते

  • @bandekarbhauji
    @bandekarbhauji 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @askabhijit umm... :) what is laccadive sea?

  • @Tanuj_Pokhriyal
    @Tanuj_Pokhriyal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    #AskAbhijit Pak-Us relation after Bajwa termination?

  • @OfficialGOD
    @OfficialGOD ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn how did I miss this xd

  • @agadurapparamachandra8291
    @agadurapparamachandra8291 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shiva
    Shakti
    is omnipresent,
    Krishna
    Radha
    is omnipresent.
    Names are different but.
    Sri OM Sri

  • @avi130avi130
    @avi130avi130 ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏🏻

  • @utube9377
    @utube9377 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    TIMESTAMPS PLZ

  • @iamMohitt
    @iamMohitt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Abhjit please share you intro music

  • @milano9012
    @milano9012 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👏👏

  • @dupedandi
    @dupedandi ปีที่แล้ว

    The fact that even innour own system the kundalini rises in spiral form .... Yatha brahmanda tatha pinda

  • @Rahul-Jain
    @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    #askabhijit
    Gravity do not exist as what NASA scientist tells us, it is actually mixture of buoyancy and density.
    Hindi 'गुरुत्वाकर्षण' is not same as English gravity which space organisation tells us, it is actually attractive towards guru element.

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      #askabhijit
      Earth is flat.
      Hindi and Vedic cosmology doesn't go in sync with modern space science cosmology, they are lying to us right from our childhood.
      In Vedic cosmology it is mentioned that that there are 14 planes and earth plane is in middle.
      Whole of space is fake, that scientist temperament is needed and some research. And yes, I would shakle your knowledge right from your core.

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      #askabhijit
      th-cam.com/video/STfsleffkms/w-d-xo.html
      How nasa fools us. As a teacher you should see all views.

    • @giftsenpai
      @giftsenpai 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello sir, the thing you talking about i find it interesting can you please explain in details a bit further....thank you in advance😊🕉

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@giftsenpai first understand this thing, a sphere is not called gol in Sanskrit, for that वृत word is used, but gol is used for something which is round like circle drawn on paper 2D in shape not 3D, the plate in which you eat would be best description of flat earth and only plate can be considered gol or round.
      It is just that people become researcher without basic understanding and knowledge of Sanskrit language.
      Hindus consider themselves superior but in fact they are just copying NASA because you have either not read your own scriptures or haven't overstood it.

    • @Rahul-Jain
      @Rahul-Jain 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@giftsenpai and this also, all this will shatter your notions about science and would act as friendly questioning virus to your brain.
      th-cam.com/video/6QaX8GQ596I/w-d-xo.html

  • @sudeepmalakar3781
    @sudeepmalakar3781 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🕉️🕉️🙏🙏

  • @pitlaman7010
    @pitlaman7010 ปีที่แล้ว

    what is after vedanta?🤔

  • @ANZAC362
    @ANZAC362 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1+1=2 Is The Only True Answer But It Has A Millions Of Wrong Answers.
    May We All Could Find The Ultimate Truth Through Open Mind And Open Heart And Accept The Ultimate Truth.

  • @ananthan8951
    @ananthan8951 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    All this is truly mind-boggling and I frankly understand nothing of it. All I grasped is Sat = Reality Chit =Consciousness. (And Ananda = Bliss the very nature of the Absolute, according to Vedanta, which is much easier to comprehend; only takes walking the razor's edge to realise). I have this old doubt: Is the material universe only empirical reality but a transcendental fallacy?