@@n0w0rries yes indeed my friend. The Zoroastrians in India are called Parsis. They are the descendants of Iranians that fled to India from Iran during and after the Arab Islamic conquest of the Persian Empire in order to preserve their Zoroastrian identity. Even after 1,000+ years of separation, studies show that modern-day Parsis, genetically, are still very close to Iranians. The extent to which they mixed varies, as some Parsis avoided intermarriage with local populations in an effort to preserve their identity, while others intermixed, to some degree or another, with the local populations, especially Gujaratis.
You guys are mentioned in our Holy books as the tribe of Parush, which is from where the name Parsi came. Rig Veda our holy book says that The tribe of Parush (Ancient iranian aryans) migrated westwards into the iranian plateau and beyond and the tribe of Bharata (ancient Indian aryans) migrated eastwards into the indus Valley and eventually settled over whole North India
It's kinda funny that so much racial superiority has been attributed to these Aryan steppe nomads and their descendants, considering that the people who spearheaded civilization in Europe and India had nothing to do with them. Civilizations were built by farmers, not by nomads or hunter-gatherers or pastoralists or whatnot.
@@virginia3168 no it is an Australian Scientist who found that Australian Indigenous people are initially of Indian Origin. even they found the same DNA in the Dogs they raised with the Dogs in India.
@@xenzorygames4116 No, northern aboriginal Australians can trace as much as 11% of their genomes to migrants who reached the island around 4,000 years ago from India.
As an Indian, Iranian people look bit similiar to our people. However in India people skin color varies from white as paper to dark as night, but Iranian are mostly fair.
What i don't understand is, why is the vedic system only exists india? If the aryan migration theory is true why doesn't such vedic culture doesn't exists anywhere outside India? Why are there no mention of any such ancestral land of the Aryans in the Ancient Indian scripts? Surely the books that talk about the universe wouldn't forget to mention such details?
Ancient Greek, Roman, Slav and other paganism religion is already banished because of Abrahamic religions.... But in ancient times Greek religion, Roman religion and Hinduism is just the same. The Indo European thunder God Sky Father is recemblance of Indra Zeus Jupiter and other paganism religion
Indus valley civilization is older than ancient Greeks and vedic culture is even ancient than indus valley civilization, Also Roman pagan culture isn't same as the Indian traditions, if they are same where are the Brmha,Vishnu,Shiva? There are evidence of lingam(form of Shiva) found in Indus valley excavations. Why don't I see Romans worshipping Shiva lingam?Also the Bhakti(idol worship) culture is just one aspect of the santhana dharma, it has more accomplishments in human consciousness and the way of life in general, for example it talks about everything from Indian marriage to how a house should be built to how to eat, there is so much thought put into every little human action and thought, the philosophies even explore why a person shout when in anger. Why don't I find such depth in these European cultures of that time that are supposed to taught us civilization?
what a nonsensical video. Indo-aryan and Dravidian refer to language groups, not "races" or phenotypes or genotypes. It is as if we can talk of "Romance genes" and "germanic genes" and Finno-Hungarian genes and races. Only when it comes to India , all scientific conventions are put in the dustbin and the quality of discussions becomes racial
I am very much an Indian and did my ancestry DNA testing through National Geographic - it showed 37% South Indian, 30% North Indian, 15%Danish, 15% Portuguese and 3% Chinese. For sure my Mother is of mixed Eurasian ancestry, but I could never figure out where the Chinese DNA came from. How's that for a diverse mix!
The Chinese where international trader's of the oceans for over a thousand years ? Including the Indian Ocean the Pacific Ocean . A Great Admiral lead a large trading fleet under one emperor only to return years later to a different Emperor reign ? ?
@Ancetralbrew I just wanted to let you know that "Indo-Aryan" and "Dravidian" are not ancestries or DNA as you've stated in the start of the video. They are language families that have nothing to do with genetics.
When the Indo-Aryan speaking people settled and mixed with the local people at that time, then surely they contributed their ancestral DNA into the admixture. So are you suggesting that didn't happen?
@@samkupp1390 no we are not suggesting that did not happen. It must have. But trying to say a language family is tied to genetics is silly. You and I are talking in English now. But our ancestry maybe different. To say that because you speak English you must be British is silly. That is the point of the comment here.
@@samkupp1390 also non tribal southern indians are ASI (large portion) + ANI (small portion). ASI is a mixture of AASI (large portion) + Aryan (small portion). And AASI is West Iranian hunter gatherer + Andamanese tribe. So if you do the entire calculation, you maybe surprised to know that the modern southern Indians are actually the genetically most distant population from Sub Saharan Africans when compared to all other races, despite some surface level similarities. These are also the population that made the IVC.
LOL there is nothing called South Indian genetics 😂 what kind of genetics you have will depend on your caste and community. If you are a Telugu Brahmin then you will have at least 20% Indo Aryan genetics and if you are a Telugu schedule tribe then you will have at least 60% Indus valley genetics
@@ShankNBA today those so called ancient South Indians are only found in Andaman and Nicobar Islands (especially in North sentinel Island). They were pure African black. Indians have Indus valley genetics which is a combination of Indo African(ancestors of sentinel people) and so called ancient Persian farmers (origin is not confirmed) and some Indo Aryan genetics and very little amount of Iranian Tibetan and southeast Asian genetics.
@@DannycageGhostrider I agree with this. My point was showcasing the understanding of 23 and me about my genetics. Because all it says is it’s 100% South Indian which can’t be true today unless I am Jarawa.
@@ShankNBAI don't agree, having steppe ancestry or andamanese ancestry doesn't necessarily mean an invasion of outsiders you can have the steppe/andamanese DNA even if women migrated into the subcontinent
It's really interesting. I just have a question, did you study the central african populations? Like DRC? I dont want to send my sample and see that there is nothing about that. Im from the Luba tribe and I've never found any dna research that talk about my tribe and the possible ancestors that can be mine. I know about the bantus, but are we only one population? Eastern bantu have afroasiatic component too and southern bantu khoisan component. But for us central bantu, just bantu? Thank you for the answer
Indo-Aryan is a misnomer for the Steppes pastoralists. Arya is a term for ‘noble’ and this word as well as Aryan culture and literature developed in the Indo-Iranian plateau, not in the Steppes. The Steppes pastoralists had no developed language, culture or literature at the time they migrated. Andronovo and Yamnaya are far removed from Aryan culture. Calling them Aryan would be akin to calling the migrants out of Africa as the original Aryans. The Aryans developed from an intermingling of the 3 groups you described.
Actually what happened was, these Iranians formed in Indian Subcontinent, and they moved towards todays Iran and Ancient Mesopotamia. All these Historians says Iranian agriculturalist came to India, but its not, its other way they moved out form Indian Subcontinent. and they established civilizations there. First these hunter gathers, Indo Iranians lived in Indian subcontinent by using Hunting, collecting foods , vegetables fruits from trees, getting fishes from rivers and drinking water from rivers ponds etc. the Indian subcontinent habitat was plenty of resource full, like no other continent had these advantages. Indo Iranians Happened because of the Genetic mutations. When ever. you see any continent has lot of diversities, languages thats a sign of Oldest Human Habitats. Forming Agricultural Society is like, one day a Hunter gatherer eat a fruit( Eg; Mango) and he did threw the seed outs side of his cave. After couples of days he came back and checked it the place he threw the seed , now its a small plant. these process he continually watched . wow now he learned a lesson. The seed planting. The beginning of Agriculture.
@@HunterGatherer90 There is zero proof that Iranians were formed in India. The Iranian Kings called themselves Aryans BUT never ever claimed or even imagined they came from India. LOL.
@@HunterGatherer90 Pastoralists havs constantly conquered agriculturists and became the aristocrats. Thus is common throughout the World. Many Chinese ruling dynasties were northern Pastoralists. But the difference in between China and India is that China is racially much more homogeneous while India is a melting pot of races.
How come there not more (or any) DNA analysis on ancient Dravidian and Indus Valley civilization skeleton types? The Indo Aryan speaking Western Steppe Herders carrying Indo Europeans are by now fairly well studied in their ancestral specimens found throughout Eurasia, but the ancestral Indus Valley genetic profile seems to be lacking in research by comparison. The only paper I've read related to autosomal and/or Y DNA profiles associated w/ the region is a study on the discoveries of Wezmeh cave, in the Iranian Zagros, where a male skeleton tested revealed a Sub-haplogroup previously unknown in other ancient samples, namely G2b, which contributed to some of the ancestral South Asian population groups like Brahui, Pashtun and Kalash. This sub haplotype is in striking contrast of other ancient G-M201 samples, namely the majority of so called Anatolian Farmers and consequently Early European Farmers, who belonged to subclades of Y DNA haplogroup G2a. A clue to the so called 'Iranian Component' in South Asia, might have its roots in the formation of the Bactria Margiana Archeological Complex. (BMAC).
quite frankly, rich europeans funded most of the research into indo-europeans, now indians and other asians will have to fund the research into the other groups.
@@AKumar-co7oe You're saying that these 'rich Europeans' who you claim funded most of the South Asian Archeological research deliberately ignored and/or excluded sites they thought had no IE skeletons and am rail culture? Are you sayin they deliberately ignored viable, Indus Valley, Dravidian/Harappan Civilization specimens?
@@teelurizzo8542 let's first start with the claim that Europeans funded south Asian archaeological research - that is not true - please shove your racial superiority complex up your rectum. Now that we've established that baseline we can continue the rest of the discussion with the basic understanding that the average European's superiority complex is in no way commensurate with their actual contributions to society
@@teelurizzo8542 there are basic logistical issues, northern samples are better preserved than tropical ones. and historically developing countries have not funded this research to the same degree
Again in the discussion on ancestral contribution of the DNA of the South Asian Continental. They always forget the 3rd element . The South East Asia and East Asian genetic contribution to the sub continent. Austro Asiatic speaking farmers from the East were present in large numbers the Ganges Bramaputra confluence from at 2500 BC before the Yamnaya Pastorialist. Jharkand East Bihar North Orissa Bengal Assam and the North East were already occupied and the migration from the east and later Tibet was continuous for 3000 years until well into the 17th century.
True, I'm not from India but I am South Asian and I have the East/Southeast Asian component and my haplogroup is also East Asian in origin: Haplogroup O. East Asian-related people have been in South Asia longer than the Steppe pastoralists but they're always forgotten.
Ancestral Brew you are amazing man! I appreciate a lot your work, could you do a video on Tibetan people genetics? Actually Tibetans has some unique genes like hémoglobine gene which make them easier to breathe in higher altitude.
He is absolutely wrong about the Steppe and Yamnaya people migrating to India...... And he wholly ignores the OUT OF INDIA THEORY and the latest evidence supporting it
@@sanjayshah7776 it's insane to believe in Aryan invasion but it's outright stupid to believe in out of India theory. Out of India theory conveniently leaves out the fact that R1A which is parent of the subgroup R1A1 has highest diversity in eastern Europe while emphasizing on the fact that R1A1 has highest diversity in India. Then out of India tries to convince you that these Indians went from being highly civilized to being nomadic and tribal in the steppe. As we all know it's generally the opposite but these Indians somehow chose to devolve. One can only find this laughable. Next is convenient use of the yamnaya who were actually R1B which is not found in India.
i like the assumption of how Indian ancestral people were civilized and taught agriculture by horse riding 'Aryans', while in steppe the 'Aryans' lived in stone age.
In kerala , state in southern india, there is legend of Parashu Ram (whose weapon was axe or could be from Persia) who brought his people from the north and inhabited the land that came up from the sea! He had to save his people and take revenge against his fathers(Jamdagni) killer (kshatriya). He is so far a revered figure for the hindus often depicted with curly beard. This could have happend 5000 to 7000 years ago. Unfortunatley we never used to record history, only legends and folk tales survived.
We (Tyagi or bhumihar brahmin) are the descendants of lord Parashu Ram, I already know this story. So, Basically those brahmins abandon their priesthood and participate in that war become bhumihar brahmin (the one who captured the land) and after the war our ancestors can't go back to priesthood, so our ancestors become farmers. Bascially every state has different term for them like Tyagi(West UP/Haryana) or bhumihar brahmin (East UP/Bhihar) and likewise every state has some.
Offending sentiments has become our primary faith now. Internal elements triggered by external funding intended to break the nation from all sects has lead to too much filth which will never get cleaned . Forget parasurama ,We are sitting on a branch and cutting it.
Wow man you are to the point. There were migrations world wide at different time periods, but some people in denial mode, i hope this video opens the eye for some. As you said brahmins will have higher R1A hapalogroup than non brahmins.
Brahmins and non brahmins are part of the same group. The warrior class, the business class, the technocrats and artisans are part of the same group. Caste is based on the work they do. Like carpenter caste, gold Smith caste, fisherman caste etc.
@@user-uh1di7de6kThere you go 😂😂😂 Thanks for your lesson bro. Don't you know brahmins are born from the head of Brahma and they have top brain in the world. Try telling them that they are the same group as other non brahmins 😂😂😂😂😂
Stop using these types of propaganda words like Indo-Aryan & Dravidian. Now everybody know they are all made up theories. There is no such thigh as Indo-Aryan & Dravidian. DNA wise we are originally Bhartiya Vedica civilization.
Yes outsiders always wanted to divide india especially Europeans Some and may be most of the Bengali also have Chinese DNA Nobody use term indo Chinese like that stuff. Beacuse they don't came in their propaganda
Well, that spun my head around. India has such a large admixture! I would still like a finer breakdown of the Dravidians, please? I am interested in their connections to Sumer. My compliments to the chef, a wonderful report.
Oh so indus valley related poplations migrated southwards which is why Telugus, Kannadigas, Malayalis and Tamils have high indus valley ancestry like you said in 2:30
A very interesting clip. I m very curious to learn more about the Jat. Thracians had a tribe called Getai. That name was transcribed by the Greeks who don't have the J sound, just G. Jat has J not G. Besides the Massagetae were E of Iran. Could all three be related? Getai, Massagetae and Jats? Do Jats have their own language?
I got my 23andme ancestry done and they have similar feedback, Tibetan haplogroup on mother’s side and Ukrainian/Norwegian on father side. For my wife it was Sardinian and Syrian and the immigration happened within last 1000 years
I've reviewed several of your video clips and am learning a lot. Many populations have had circular histories - out of Africa, then back into the continent, and from there into and out of other regions. I was confused by your narrative about the Iranian origin 1:48/9. It might have been because of the conjunction "but." Aren't the Zagrosian farmers of the Iranian Plateau "Iranian-related"?
The "back into the continent" parts of the "out of Africa, then back into the continent" theories in some of the videos are not entirely accurate. Apart from the series of conquests by the Persians, Greeks, and Romans, the largest migration into Africa occurred in the mid-7th century when the Arabs invaded North Africa to spread Islam. This invasion resulted in the displacement of much of the indigenous population. Additionally, between the 16th and 18th centuries, the Barbary slave trade brought many European slaves and concubines into North Africa. As for the migration of various ethnic groups into India, I don't know whether any of the process was peaceful or not.
Haryanvi Jat who travelled more than 50 countries, throughout my travel i have been mistaken for Iranian, Tunisian, Egyptian, Romanian, Kashmiri, Punjabi, even some Korean thought i looked like a Korean actor... 🤷🏻♂️
I am Brahmin & once a German tourist said that I have facial features very similar to that of Germans,all my brahman,jaat,gujjar,ahir,thakur friends are fair-skinned & long skulled.
@@Aryaman_mishra775 When I was in Leh Ladakh, a German tourist couple said that in Italy, there are a lot of boys who look like you. Infact there was another Italian tourist in the 4 by 4 from leh to srinagar by road. They said I looked more Italian than the Italian himself, we had a good laugh about it, he had got tanned from extensive travel in Ladakh. I had an Army crew cut and that time and used to do modelling. On my visit to Italy, I realised what they said was indeed true.
India and Greece, Italy has the same history about the migration of Indo European The first people of Greece are neolithic Anatolians farmers (J2 DNA) and Mediterranean Pelasgians (E-v13 DNA). They are the one who built the Mycenean civilization( take note they already adopted the Hellenic language because of Greek/Hellenic stocks just in their North), and in Italy especially south have high Anatolians E J2 DNA Haplo group tribes. Around bronze age this civilization collapse due to invasions/migrations of the Indo European Hellenic people/Proto Greeks stocks, italic Romans this people where nomadics war like people like Aryans, they worshiping multiple Indo European Gods and Thunder God like Zeus, Jupiter, Indra... This Hellenic people direct decendants where the Doric Greeks( Sparta and Maccedonians, DNA Haplo R). Herodotus classified 3 ethnicity of Greeks in ancient Greece this are Dorics- Indo European Hellenic (Sparta and Maccedonians) Ionics - Hellenized Anatolians (Athenians etc) Aeolians - hellenized Pelasgians (Thessalians etc)
There's a theory that the Greek and Indo-Iranian languages split from a hypothesized Graeco-Aryan language. This implies that the ancestral speakers of Greek and Indo-Iranian (which includes the Indo-Aryan languages of India) languages were one and the same people. Over time these groups split and moved southwest and southeast from the Central Asian steppe to mix with the Pre-Indo-European peoples of their respective destinations. This means that Greeks and Indians likely have more recent shared ancestry than they do with other European or West Asian groups. Perhaps the arrival of Alexander into India in 323 BCE was not so much an invasion as the magnetic pull of ancient shared ancestry pulling two related descendants together!
WhaTeverrr 😂, Im a proud Hindustani , an Indian We stopped these racial talks ten years ago, we now address ourselves as Indians You bringing these conversations back is not gonna change the fact that we are one
I have done my genetic test via Ancestry DNA. How can you help with further analysis. I will gladly share the results for some insights into migrations, ancestor admixtures during neolithic, iron age etc. I hail from Brahmin family of SouthIndia but have knowledge that we hail from North India since our group is called Northerners in Kannada. Let me know!
Many Brahmin castes of Tamilnadu trace their ancestry to North India. They have genealogical charts to prove. If you dig more than 14 th generation! Don't mean to say that all Brahmin castes migrated some 500 years ago. Same is true about Brahmins of Gujarat and Bengal!
bro what about Nepalese, I am a nepalese and ever since i was born i used to look like European and people were confused as well but since im getting older and older im 20 almost i have beard and almost darker hair but in my child hood i used to have brown blondish hair and I looke like a middle eastern /iranian now and some people tell me that. Could u make a video on Aryans of indian and nepal and who their ancestors are??
It is understandable if you look around some features are so complex. My father God rest his soul was white . Yes his family was from British India. My mom was Persian ancestry of old like Samakand or vicinity but both were from indian subcontinent . It is said we have many diverse pool of gene in us. Thank you for the updates.❤
Now As Southern Arc released, Now Indo-europian originated from modern day Georgia instead of Steppie Culture(south Ukraine), still waiting when they will found 7000 year old skeleton of person who has first mutation of R1a1 Heplogroup and its found in India. Usually High diversity of Heplogroup means possible origin place and India got this cover.
Thank you for keeping it short and sweet mindful of viewer attention span. This is such a dry topic and difficult to keep the focus for 20 min (many youtubers are 20 min long and I end up fast forwarding).
Ok video but I think you should have mentioned that AASI are Basal East Eurasian actually. A lot of people I see are thinking that they are directly African Tribals
@@saanjanibaar8085veryone migrated from Africa bro. Whats your point. AASI are split from population which formed modern day- East Asian and South East Asian
@@reddragon100 Yup they migrated directly from Africa as well, via the Middle East into South Asia. AASI split from the East Eurasian meta-population, or Eastern Non-African population, only shortly after they split from the common Eurasian Ancestry.
Central Asia was called Aryan bhoomi.. Indra lok.. Devraj Indra lived there... Due to you Mongols attacks Aryans settled in Iran and Indiana... Bharatvarsh... Har har mahadev..
@@Romantic-yu2dr Do you know honestly how far back in history that is? If everyone started claiming each other's lands on historical basis it'd be chaos
@@Ubermench-uy7dw Har har mahadev... Thanks to our ancestors.. We are Hindus... People in Today Central Asia are becoming secular.. Look Turkey is already secular... Kazakhi are becoming secular...
The Croatians came from India. 60% of Croatian is Sanskrit. 30% bramin DNA. There is a town on Croatia called Kali. Croatians call themselves Hrvati. This name came from Iran. Before that they were the Saraswati.
i am indian Bengali took DNA test from 23and me it showed 55persouth asian 25percent south east east asian10percent Scandinavian10percentwest asiant is Scandinavian means steppe yamnaya????
Bengalis live in east India bordering Myanmar, so having 5 to 18 percent Myanmar and East Asian ancestry is common in bengal. The scandanavian part is not actually Scandinavian ancestry, it’s ancient indo aryan ancestry from indo aryan migration to India 3500 to 4000 years back. The Brahmins in Bengal have around 15 to 18 percent, so there is probably some brahmin ancestry. Also, Indians don’t have yamnaya ancestry. We have sintasthta ancestry related to Russians and polish people.ajit agarkar is the example
Yes, Scandinavian means Steppe Yamnaya People. Scandinavian have an extremely high precentage of this, so it gets classified as the Scandinavian ethnic group. It is "easier" than Saying that Scandinavians are 100% South Asian.
Fantastic video. So much info from Yamnaya to their tie in etc. Iranians also have their DNA in Western Indian peoples is not a shock. Interestingly the Romanian people DNA was found in large percent in the Rajasthani Banjaran nomadic peoples which makes sense because those nomads ended up wandering to India and settling there
@thezoldics7648 there's zero evidence of that. Did you not watch the video or do any research? Indians were never explorers and never ventured out of India. The Greeks and Persians and others regularly visited India for trade and it is possible many settled in India or forced Indian women to bear their kids leading to gene pool from there getting introduced into India. There's no mention of any of these regions in any Indian texts but reverse is true. And aryans of central Asia came to India and became the new Indians. These same aryans also moved west to Europe. India was always conquered and never the conqueror so how is what youre claiming even remotely possible? Esp when DNA evidence clearly shows Indian DNA has later revision markers proving that Aryans took over and became Indians with their culture and language (sanskrit)
@@fr9714that's absolute nonsense and yóu should study more about India's population diversity as well as history instead of making passive aggressive blanket statements that is hilarious to all Indians and population geneticists, Indians migrating outwards and settling down in different parts of the world as well as marrying local women there is literally a world renowned phenomenon, Xerses literally has his tomb decorated with loyal Indian soldiers of him that sacrificed themselves fighting for him, Armenia has history of Indian warriors caught in a power struggle with the locals, Greeks watched an Indian ascetic ímmolate himself to showcase his religious devotion that literally turned into a legend among Greek Scholars yes except for Chola empire's expansion into East Asia there are not as many expeditions outward into north west from India but that was because majority of Indian Empires have largely been centered into mainland India which is the Indo Gangatic Plains, it was a huge stretch of land to keep hold of once yóu're empire starts to border with coastal kingdoms in south to all the way to the Kabul river in north like the Mauryans, Shunga and Gupt Empire had but Indians were travelling to all other places in as much frequency as the other nations were But even then the modern dna studies show no signs of Greek or European dna, what does exist is classified as ANI population dna that showed up the subcontinent around 4500 years ago which today is generally accepted to have arrived from around some place east of Caspian sea, Yóu just mistook ANI population for European or Persian dna when yóu said Aryans became new Indians, What actually happened was multiple waves of caucasian migrations happened throught the time period of 3000 to 900 BCE, Vedic Aryans were earliest of the settlers who were followed up by BMAC population groups and then the Scythians, India was never "conquered", portions of it did face occupations from foreign rulers but the only group of foreign occupants to have ever ruled the entirety of India were British, Greeks and Persians came after Vedic Aryans had arrived and Indian subcontinent was virtually a Hindu land dominated by upper caste Hindus that posses higher frequency of Vedic Aryan dna, the Greeks and other invaders after them were confronted by these Aryans, furthermore these Aryan nobles in India had a booming séx slàve trade with the Romans and Greeks, the Greek and Roman women were known as Yavanis and were bought and sold and married amongst, so there goes yóur confused presumption about Indian women being forced to bear Greek and Persian children when it's the other way around
The historical references mention about Indo Aryans in this video are wrong. Yamnaya are not Indo-Aryans. This Analysis of molecular variance(AMOVA) test results shows that Aryans(Brahmins) had genetic(Y-haplogroup R1a1*) affinities with several foreign populations of Central Asia and Europe. The Yamnaya(Y-haplogroup R1b) culture was a late Copper Age to early Bronze Age archaeological culture of the region between the Southern Bug, Dniester, and Ural rivers, dating to 3300-2600 BC. Based on archaeological evidence and genetic evidence Yamnaya invade europe, massacred all the males and impregnated the women in order to rapidly further their bloodlines. The Aryans(Brahmins) who could not withstand this brutal attack gradually migrated from Europe to Asia as refugees and settled in the Gangetic plains of India.
no Romanian people DNA is found in Rajasthani Banjara tribe. The only people of Romania who share DNA similarity with Rajasthani Banjara tribe are the Roma people who are known to have migrated out of India hundreds of years ago. They are also called Gypsy and Romanis. not supporting the bogus Out of India theory but around 1000 years ago Indians migrated west towards Levant and Europe. Also no Iranian DNA is found in West Indian people. The time when Iranian valley people came to India, modern Iranians didn't exist. The same Aryans that came to India, took a left and entered Iran too. Those aryans mixed with the same Iranian valley people and gave birth to ancient Iranians who spoke Avestan. The only reason they are called Iranian related or Iranian farmers is because they lived in Iran. Modern Indians and modern Iranian came into existence at the same time side by side.
The generalization that most North Indian Brahmin have higher Aryan DNA is wrong thing. A research paper suggesting such findings which is far away from Ground reality is a wrong reference. I will give you example of my own family. I've a much fairer complexion in my paternal family (from Uttar Pradesh). Because my maternal family has Ancestory from Kashmir (a colder place) My friend with similar surname "Sharma" from Bihar is a Dark complexioned person. It appears he has high amount of Australoid characters. Bihar is a land rich of Tribal communities. Brahmins are diverse genetically
Fatyanova are the ancient Iranians before they split from the Kurgan tribes, they migrated and many of their descendants migrated to other regions and became Abashevo, Sintashta, Androvnova, Srubnaya. Androvnova migrated south to Afghanistan and met the bmac people, and in India they met the Hidus Valley civilization, The Sintashta and Andronovo are clearly Indo-Iranians. The Fatyanovo and Abashevo can be regarded as proto-Indo-Iranians. The Fatyanovo represented the very beginnings of the Indo-Iranian peoples' split away from the Corded Ware Culture.
Yamnaya contributed no direct ancestry to Indo-Aryans, who were the offshoot of the eastern Corded Ware of the forest-steppe and founders of Sintashta culture which originated the chariot
There is North Indians who are darker than South Indians. Also for indian tamil and Sri lankan tamil , it's easy to differentiante between each other. They are not the same. Most indian tamils living in Tamil Nadu are anti hindu . This is due politics and Dravidian movement. Whereas in Sri Lanka, there is no Dravidian movement. Most Sri Lankan tamil are religious. The caste system, culture, tradition, customs within the Sri Lankan tamil community is different from indian tamil. Most Sri Lankan tamil don't identify with indian tamils. Also there is brahmins who are ways darker than Dalits. Colorism has nothing to do with caste system. Colonization does.
Both ASI and ANI are indian orgin DNA. Aryan means humble and noble people in Sanskrit. People living in Indian subcontinent are known as Aryans. Its not a race.
@@bhuvan_357_5 Perhaps, but the original civilization of northern India was the Indus Valley Culture, not the Vedic culture. I think Balgangadhar Tilak is probably correct, and the ancient homeland of the Vedic Aryans was the Arctic. It was probably climate change that pushed them south.
@@bhuvan_357_5 nope. Vedas are how Aryans invaded this land. There's nothing native in Vedas. And there were civilisation in this subcontinent before the vedas.
Essentially yes Sanskrit and vedic civilizations are foreign as others. The closest to Native is the non Vedic belief system that barely exist today in South India
Sanskrit was still formed in India as a scholarly language, it was not a certain group's native language that "was brought". It didn't exist before Aryans were in India
Nice video but just am kind of confused, as when these Iranian/ Indo-Aryan migrations took place into India, how did people of a completely different culture, language, religion & race easily dated & marry each other if that's the case, especially in such large numbers (as there are 1.4 Billion Indians today)? If you compare to the 1 Billion 🕉Hindus of 🇮🇳 India today in 2023, most of them still not only are against foreign weddings or even inter-state weddings within the same country, but also strictly against not marrying to anyone outside their caste, even if they share the same Hindu religion in the same state in the same country even in 2023. So just wanted to ask you to know about different cultures like the Iranians and Aryans & how they intermarried with the indigenous Indians in large numbers so easily?
the thing that you underestimate is the fact of forceful child baring by the conquerers and also the fact that conquerers have prestige in society im iranian when turks and mongols attacked iran they graped alot and thats why 5 % of iranian dna is turku mongol and the other fact was khans were prestigious and had conqubines while an average farmer man would die in war and would have no child thats how genes spread back in the day iran and india are very close in terms of genetics and they were close culturally before islam and we also had cast system but after islam our cultures differed alot pakistan is like a middle ground between iranian and indian culture and gene and language like half their word is persian
That is today during the sultanate era this practice came up... during the sultanate rule the more lighter you are in skin color you were given jobs by the sultans. but before that Indians did intermarry with each other for example my Group is basically Sudra in Paternal side and Brahmin in Maternal side. by your logic my Jatti would not have existed and I am a Telugu btw... my Maternal Side comes from a Group of Uttar Pradesh Brahmins. my Group is called the Andhra. in South it was a Common Term to be called Sat-Sudras who are Descendants of Brahmins and Sudras. in India there are many Jatti's who are Sat-Sudras. Sat-Sudras were the ruling class you can even notice today. Nair, Reddy, Naidu, Thevar etc... these are Sat-Sudras who will be lighter than your average South Indian.
So these migrations happen over large periods of time, some of the first people to reach India was about 60,000 years ago, then you would have had different waves of people, who would have set up different communities, most people due to need, would learn to communicate and trade , for example we know of monks from China who would have come into India during Buddhist period with no local language ,and still lived and traded, of course there would have also been fights etc as described above, also ancient India stretches from near Afghan regions down to south India , meaning bigger then Europe, so it's not like every day they came into contact, and so as settlements grew so did language and trade , Indus valley is the oldest civilization found , but not the only , as we know other parts of India were also inhabited, with its own customs , modern dna only got restricted during 16ty century onwards as books speaking against changing and inter caste marriage , this was further exploited during Mughal and British rule and we now have the bagged left today, but still if India was to do a DNA test we would soon see the mixing that has occured and hopefully drop the dumb notions of separate people
You took dna analysis from Gujarat but majority of people in gujarat are not even native for example patel or patidar ancestors are from pamir highland near by river amu
Its my understanding that these Step peoples also went into Europe. They also brought animal husbandry and agriculture to the Hunter Gather culture of thst region as well. Very interesting.
This video makes sense - for most of Indian history, it was a stable agriculturally rich country that frequently culminated in big civilizations that drew migrants from all over. Sometimes the migration was heavy (like the Steppe invasion), but for most of history, it was a constant but manageable flow inward of people/DNA.
Evidence against the Aryan Invasion Theory 1. Refutation of AIT’s dating of Rig Veda Rig Veda, Bharat’s foundational scriptural text, contains numerous references to the Sarasvati River, which is variously described as the “greatest of rivers,” “glorious,” “loud roaring,” and “mother of floods. However, the Sarasvati River was nowhere to be found until recently, when modern satellite imagery was able to locate the dry bed that once was this mighty river . Studies have also shown that monsoon declined monotonically after 5,000 BCE, gradually weakening the Sarasvati, leading to its virtual extinction by around 1,500 BCE . This completely debunks the AIT account that Rig Veda was composed after the purported Aryan invasion/migration circa 1,500 BCE and indicates that it was composed closer to 5,000 BCE when the river was in its prime . 2.The number of Sanskrit manuscripts in existence today is roughly 1000 times the number of manuscripts available in Greek, Latin, and other ancient European languages combined. Such an overwhelming disparity in the literary outputs between the Aryans and the Europeans is difficult to reconcile with the AIT postulation of their shared heritage 3.new scientific studies says that the R1a genome has it’s oldest presence in the South Asia (particularly in South India) and it has been found that the R1a is found in higher percentages in ancient South Indian tribes like Chenchus, Valmiki communities in Andhra Pradesh & Kallar tribes in Tamilnadu. Chenchu’s have the highest diversity factor & the occurence of R1a in Chenchus is 27% which is higher than that of Iranians & Eastern Europeans indicating that the genome related to R1a haplogroup moved out from India & entered Iran, Europe.
Interesting video. I am Indian Gujarati and got 5% Greece, 3% east Slavic Russian, 2% Scandinavia. Also, 9% Indus valley and 3% Anatolia, Armenia and Mesopotamia on ftDNA's ancestry test. My maternal haplogroup is W3a1b which was found in Shahr i Sokhtah mummies in east Iran and and in Swat valley. Recently, female W3a1b was found to be one of the key drivers of Bronze age indo-Aryan steppe migrations.
@@hijazlanderftdna is better than 23andme. Ancestry components are broken down better on myorigins 3.0. I get 78% overall Asian and rest is European and trace middle eastern which translates the same over on my gedmatch Harappa.
The genetic diversity of India is widely recognized and its representation is commendable. However, it is advisable to exercise caution in sharing your genetic sample with unknown individuals or company outside of your own home county. Your individual genome is akin to a personal ID; as technology advances, there is a risk of misuse of this data. Such actions could potentially have adverse consequences in the future.
could you explain some disadvantages ? Other than chemically engineering some poison that will only work with our dna or smth similar. I can think of this, one can analyse what kinds of addictions we are susceptible to and companies might misuse this to sell us those products. Can you think of others ?Im genuinely curious.
@@aneeshprasobhan There are many potential disadvantages and risks associated with sharing genetic data. 1) Genetic data can reveal highly personal information, not about the individual but about their own relatives. This can easily be misused by people and companies, for example, insurance companies who easily predict possible diseases which can come at a certain age, by that individual and relative can slightly 2) Gentic can reveal massive amounts about a person and relatives. If it's common for everyone, it can quickly discriminate among people. This could occur in various settings such as employment and insurance and even in social life 3) Another one is the misinterpretation of data with companies. As you know, there are many data analysis biases; all information that we get today is certain statistical and mathematical assumptions with skewed data. If when individuals access this information without proper counselling from genetic professionals. This might lead to unnecessary alarm or misguided health decisions if you plan to do genomic data analysis and get to know your biological codes. 4) In a broader societal context, genetic data could be used for surveillance or profiling purposes, raising significant ethical concerns about personal freedom and autonomy 5) Data ownership and control. For example, if you send your DNA sample to an unknown person, such as this TH-camr, he can easily hack into other information from your samples by sequencing everything. This means you are sending all of your information to an unknown person, and he/she can sell this to a company and get money from it without putting any effort or following ethical rules of nucleic acid data 6) Ethical and legal concerns (Major issue): The use of genetic data raises various ethical questions, such as consent (especially in the case of minors or unable to consent), the right to know or not know one's genetic makeup, and how this data should be used in research and medicine.
Latest research suggests the migration of the corded ware people migrated out of Europe back into the steppes and then into India. it wasn't a steppe pasturalist society as must as a mixed group. it was the later corded ware that spread the majority of indo european language groups.
Yamanya invasion happens in Europe brother which completly changs it's demography and the whole Aryan invasion theory which you are talking about has been proved wrong 😅
Yet there is so much racism especially towards south asians more specifically to Indians due to bad stereotypes in today’s western society. That will change soon inshallah
AASI DNA increases as you go from west to east and north to south in India.Eg,an avg odia/bengali/jharkhandi have more AASI than gujarati/rajasthani.An average south Indian/Maharashtrian have more AASI dna than average haryana or Punjab people.
@@gouthamkrishnan6718 not all brahmans. Tamil Gujarati Telugu and many other Brahman communities have a lower amount of Indo Aryan genetics compared to some schedule caste groups of North India
@@DannycageGhostrider I am not talking about steppe/aryan ancestry,I am talking about caucasoid ancestry.Aryans aren't the only caucasoids who migrated to India.South and gujarati brahmins have higher iran neolithic ancestry despite having lower steppe ancestry.
The historical references mention about Indo Aryans in this video are wrong. Yamnaya are not Indo-Aryans. This Analysis of molecular variance(AMOVA) test results shows that Aryans(Brahmins) had genetic(Y-haplogroup R1a1*) affinities with several foreign populations of Central Asia and Europe. The Yamnaya(Y-haplogroup R1b) culture was a late Copper Age to early Bronze Age archaeological culture of the region between the Southern Bug, Dniester, and Ural rivers, dating to 3300-2600 BC. Based on archaeological evidence and genetic evidence Yamnaya invade europe, massacred all the males and impregnated the women in order to rapidly further their bloodlines. The Aryans(Brahmins) who could not withstand this brutal attack gradually migrated from Europe to Asia as refugees and settled in the Gangetic plains of India. No archaeological evidence of Aryans(Brahmins) living in the Indus Valley Civilization(2500-1700 BCE) has been found so far, so it is assumed that they may have entered the Indian Plain at the end of the Indus Valley Civilization.
In India 🇮🇳,there is a hot topic of Aryan invasion theory but the fact is proved that all Indians have same ancestory of Indus valley civilization people but by the course of time some Aryans mixed with North Indians because north India borders central Asia. So saying that all North Indians are Aryans and South Indians are Dravidian is a stupidity because north Indians have majority genes of Indus valley people.
If they just mixed then why all of north india speak indo european languages? And why only upper cast people have more aryan dna than lower cast people
The historical references mention about Indo Aryans in this video are wrong. Yamnaya are not Indo-Aryans. This Analysis of molecular variance(AMOVA) test results shows that Aryans(Brahmins) had genetic(Y-haplogroup R1a1*) affinities with several foreign populations of Central Asia and Europe. The Yamnaya(Y-haplogroup R1b) culture was a late Copper Age to early Bronze Age archaeological culture of the region between the Southern Bug, Dniester, and Ural rivers, dating to 3300-2600 BC. Aryans were not invaders. Based on archaeological evidence and genetic evidence Yamnaya invade europe, massacred all the males and impregnated the women in order to rapidly further their bloodlines. The Aryans(Brahmins) who could not withstand this brutal attack gradually migrated from Europe to Asia as refugees and settled in the Gangetic plains of India. No archaeological evidence of Aryans(Brahmins) living in the Indus Valley Civilization(2500-1700 BCE) has been found so far, so it is assumed that they may have entered the Indian Plain at the end of the Indus Valley Civilization.
Dravidians are believed to have been those Neolithic Iranian farmers from the Zagros region who settled in the Indus Valley civilization...Maybe linked to Y haplogroup J2...They intermixed with the AASI Ancient Ancestral South Indian is linked to Y haplogroup C - M130, which is typically associated with the first wave out of Africa. C, this first wave OOA also splits to Europe, Mongolia, Japan and the Americas
Yamnaya were half CHG. And CHg and Iran N were related. So we do not know the cultural transmission between Iran N and CHG before formation of yamnaya horizon yet.
I am actually surprised by how accurate this video is. Most people think of Indian ancestry as a dichotomy when it actually is a trichotomy or even a quaternary in some cases (such as in the eastern regions of the subcontinent, where the influence East Asian-related ancestry occurs more frequently). As someone who has been reading up on and keeping up with the science of the genetic history of the Indian subcontinent, you have done an excellent job. I am a Jat from the Punjab, I have R1a1a as my paternal haplogroup, and I have blue-eyes. I assume I inherited these traits from Steppe pastoralist forebearers.
Interesting! Actually, genealogical experts have found as much as 10 percent Han Chinese ancestry amongst some people of Western Indian origin, specifically Gujarati. Perhaps this came from the Mongol and/or Turkic invasions.
Since indo aryans originated in a more challenging environment ( colder and harsher ) they had more preferred genetic characteristics. So in any country we can see preferred genetic characteristics more abundantly amoung privilaged or more powerful groups. In India it would be the brahmins and kshatriyas
2:02 from the line diagram which was taken from the study of Indus valley people clearly shows that the Iranian farmers were actually not farmers but just people who migrated from Iranian plateau and there was no mixing with Iranian farmers. This caveat in history also proves that farming in India was independently invented much like in Anatolia, Ancient China and Mesoamerica.
The people that came from the zagros to Indus where Iranian hunter gatherers, who later found farming through exchange of ideas with their Mesopotamian ancestors.
@@jancyvargheese5351 there is a good 2000-3000 years gap between Iranian hunter gathers entering India and the advent of farming in Anatolia. There is no dna exchange after the invention of the invention of farming. Look at the graph at the time stamp. That should clear the doubt. Also, I don't think before Indus valley there was any exchange of ideas without the exchange of people. Also I don't think the Iranian hunter gathers saw Iranian farmers as their ancestors.
@@islandsunset iam not talking about anatolia, which is in Turkey. Iam talking about mesapotamia, which is Iraq. The Indus civilization traded with their brothers in Iraq, and even with the Egyptians. The Indus people even went to central Asian bmac sites like shahr shota or something. They exchanged materials and ideas that way
@@jancyvargheese5351 no refuting that but farming was developed in Anatolia and then moved to Mesopotamia. Also a civilization as big as Indus Valley needed large-scale agriculture to develop first. An agrarian society can support an urban society. Farming developed way before Indus Valley Civilization came into existence.
I love India and Indian people. They are our ancient cousins, and we both share very rich histories that goes back thousands of years 🇮🇷❤🇮🇳
@@n0w0rries yes indeed my friend. The Zoroastrians in India are called Parsis. They are the descendants of Iranians that fled to India from Iran during and after the Arab Islamic conquest of the Persian Empire in order to preserve their Zoroastrian identity. Even after 1,000+ years of separation, studies show that modern-day Parsis, genetically, are still very close to Iranians. The extent to which they mixed varies, as some Parsis avoided intermarriage with local populations in an effort to preserve their identity, while others intermixed, to some degree or another, with the local populations, especially Gujaratis.
You guys are mentioned in our Holy books as the tribe of Parush, which is from where the name Parsi came. Rig Veda our holy book says that The tribe of Parush (Ancient iranian aryans) migrated westwards into the iranian plateau and beyond and the tribe of Bharata (ancient Indian aryans) migrated eastwards into the indus Valley and eventually settled over whole North India
yes India and Iran people are cousins . love from India
love you bro indiaa.
Thank you man . Proud to say my ancestors were from ancient Iran . ❤
It's kinda funny that so much racial superiority has been attributed to these Aryan steppe nomads and their descendants, considering that the people who spearheaded civilization in Europe and India had nothing to do with them. Civilizations were built by farmers, not by nomads or hunter-gatherers or pastoralists or whatnot.
Yes and fat Asses too. Look Ulan Bator- high civilisation of nomads
That's true. The Aryans likely just established themselves as elites race mixing with pre existing cultures.
The only Aryans contribution to India is Indo European religion Hinduism
I mean, language replacement is still on another level
Exactly, it's a propaganda on another level
love to India from iran ❤
Baradar 😊😍
@@109destiny
Your's Culture Comes From Iran Not Every Indian's Culture Comes From Outside !✌️
Love from India. Both dravidians and Aryans in India have Iranian genes.
@@thejus36people from Iran were also hindus in ancient times
Iranian has indian genes also.
There were nor aryan migration
Arya meant noble in ancient texts.
So the European invented it as white people
The ancestral south Indians look very much like the Australian Indigenous people.
because Australian Indigenous people have the same DNA as Indians.
@@xenzorygames4116 Did I miss that in the video?
@@virginia3168 no it is an Australian Scientist who found that Australian Indigenous people are initially of Indian Origin. even they found the same DNA in the Dogs they raised with the Dogs in India.
@@xenzorygames4116 Thank you for that.
@@xenzorygames4116 No, northern aboriginal Australians can trace as much as 11% of their genomes to migrants who reached the island around 4,000 years ago from India.
As an Indian, Iranian people look bit similiar to our people.
However in India people skin color varies from white as paper to dark as night, but Iranian are mostly fair.
North Indian
@@MrBharanish north indian plains majority dark and short
Color depends upon the region they live in...not only on dna
south people are dark majority of north are white@@keralanaturelover196
@@keralanaturelover196nah , bro I'm from up and I'm 5'9 and fair and most of us are like that.
What i don't understand is, why is the vedic system only exists india? If the aryan migration theory is true why doesn't such vedic culture doesn't exists anywhere outside India? Why are there no mention of any such ancestral land of the Aryans in the Ancient Indian scripts? Surely the books that talk about the universe wouldn't forget to mention such details?
Ancient Greek, Roman, Slav and other paganism religion is already banished because of Abrahamic religions.... But in ancient times Greek religion, Roman religion and Hinduism is just the same. The Indo European thunder God Sky Father is recemblance of Indra Zeus Jupiter and other paganism religion
Just search Indo European God "Sky Father"
Indus valley civilization is older than ancient Greeks and vedic culture is even ancient than indus valley civilization, Also Roman pagan culture isn't same as the Indian traditions, if they are same where are the Brmha,Vishnu,Shiva? There are evidence of lingam(form of Shiva) found in Indus valley excavations. Why don't I see Romans worshipping Shiva lingam?Also the Bhakti(idol worship) culture is just one aspect of the santhana dharma, it has more accomplishments in human consciousness and the way of life in general, for example it talks about everything from Indian marriage to how a house should be built to how to eat, there is so much thought put into every little human action and thought, the philosophies even explore why a person shout when in anger. Why don't I find such depth in these European cultures of that time that are supposed to taught us civilization?
@@Delllatitude7490 Indra, Zeus, Jupiter.. Indo European thunder God Sky Father
Hear about Latvian Croatian Lithuanian languages and their Gods
Thank 😊 you this was very interesting. Greetings and Love ❤ from Bulgaria 🇧🇬. I love the food from India 🇮🇳
Ты тюрк😮
Я не тюрк. Я Болгар@@Iskatel.Priklyucheniy
what a nonsensical video. Indo-aryan and Dravidian refer to language groups, not "races" or phenotypes or genotypes. It is as if we can talk of "Romance genes" and "germanic genes" and Finno-Hungarian genes and races. Only when it comes to India , all scientific conventions are put in the dustbin and the quality of discussions becomes racial
nope
I am very much an Indian and did my ancestry DNA testing through National Geographic - it showed 37% South Indian, 30% North Indian, 15%Danish, 15% Portuguese and 3% Chinese. For sure my Mother is of mixed Eurasian ancestry, but I could never figure out where the Chinese DNA came from. How's that for a diverse mix!
where i also want to check.
It's common for Indians especially from south to have chinese dna. most of their ancestors are of andamanees onge, han chinese etc
The Chinese where international trader's of the oceans for over a thousand years ? Including the Indian Ocean the Pacific Ocean . A Great Admiral lead a large trading fleet under one emperor only to return years later to a different Emperor reign ? ?
Allah ademi yaratırken azrail topragini dünyanın her yerinden getirmiş ondan olabilir
How I can check my dna ??, I am a North Indian Brahmin
@Ancetralbrew
I just wanted to let you know that "Indo-Aryan" and "Dravidian" are not ancestries or DNA as you've stated in the start of the video. They are language families that have nothing to do with genetics.
Finally, a sensible comment. I hate it when they use language family labels as DNA labels. So stupid.
first sensible comment i have seen all day
When the Indo-Aryan speaking people settled and mixed with the local people at that time, then surely they contributed their ancestral DNA into the admixture. So are you suggesting that didn't happen?
@@samkupp1390 no we are not suggesting that did not happen. It must have. But trying to say a language family is tied to genetics is silly. You and I are talking in English now. But our ancestry maybe different. To say that because you speak English you must be British is silly. That is the point of the comment here.
@@samkupp1390 also non tribal southern indians are ASI (large portion) + ANI (small portion).
ASI is a mixture of AASI (large portion) + Aryan (small portion).
And AASI is West Iranian hunter gatherer + Andamanese tribe.
So if you do the entire calculation, you maybe surprised to know that the modern southern Indians are actually the genetically most distant population from Sub Saharan Africans when compared to all other races, despite some surface level similarities. These are also the population that made the IVC.
I am Telugu. I recently did a DNA test and it told me that I am a 100% South Indian lol. Will you be able to break that down further?
LOL there is nothing called South Indian genetics 😂 what kind of genetics you have will depend on your caste and community. If you are a Telugu Brahmin then you will have at least 20% Indo Aryan genetics and if you are a Telugu schedule tribe then you will have at least 60% Indus valley genetics
@@DannycageGhostrider tell that to the phD’s at 23 and me.
@@ShankNBA today those so called ancient South Indians are only found in Andaman and Nicobar Islands (especially in North sentinel Island). They were pure African black.
Indians have Indus valley genetics which is a combination of Indo African(ancestors of sentinel people) and so called ancient Persian farmers (origin is not confirmed) and some Indo Aryan genetics and very little amount of Iranian Tibetan and southeast Asian genetics.
@@DannycageGhostrider I agree with this. My point was showcasing the understanding of 23 and me about my genetics. Because all it says is it’s 100% South Indian which can’t be true today unless I am Jarawa.
@@ShankNBAI don't agree, having steppe ancestry or andamanese ancestry doesn't necessarily mean an invasion of outsiders you can have the steppe/andamanese DNA even if women migrated into the subcontinent
It's really interesting. I just have a question, did you study the central african populations? Like DRC? I dont want to send my sample and see that there is nothing about that. Im from the Luba tribe and I've never found any dna research that talk about my tribe and the possible ancestors that can be mine. I know about the bantus, but are we only one population? Eastern bantu have afroasiatic component too and southern bantu khoisan component. But for us central bantu, just bantu?
Thank you for the answer
Perhaps My Living DNA might help.
Indo-Aryan is a misnomer for the Steppes pastoralists. Arya is a term for ‘noble’ and this word as well as Aryan culture and literature developed in the Indo-Iranian plateau, not in the Steppes. The Steppes pastoralists had no developed language, culture or literature at the time they migrated. Andronovo and Yamnaya are far removed from Aryan culture. Calling them Aryan would be akin to calling the migrants out of Africa as the original Aryans. The Aryans developed from an intermingling of the 3 groups you described.
Actually what happened was, these Iranians formed in Indian Subcontinent, and they moved towards todays Iran and Ancient Mesopotamia. All these Historians says Iranian agriculturalist came to India, but its not, its other way they moved out form Indian Subcontinent. and they established civilizations there. First these hunter gathers, Indo Iranians lived in Indian subcontinent by using Hunting, collecting foods , vegetables fruits from trees, getting fishes from rivers and drinking water from rivers ponds etc. the Indian subcontinent habitat was plenty of resource full, like no other continent had these advantages. Indo Iranians Happened because of the Genetic mutations. When ever. you see any continent has lot of diversities, languages thats a sign of Oldest Human Habitats. Forming Agricultural Society is like, one day a Hunter gatherer eat a fruit( Eg; Mango) and he did threw the seed outs side of his cave. After couples of days he came back and checked it the place he threw the seed , now its a small plant. these process he continually watched . wow now he learned a lesson. The seed planting. The beginning of Agriculture.
@@HunterGatherer90 what's your evidence or this
They had no developed language?? WTF. Steppe cultures were the daddy of Vedic culture.
@@HunterGatherer90 There is zero proof that Iranians were formed in India. The Iranian Kings called themselves Aryans BUT never ever claimed or even imagined they came from India. LOL.
@@HunterGatherer90 Pastoralists havs constantly conquered agriculturists and became the aristocrats. Thus is common throughout the World. Many Chinese ruling dynasties were northern Pastoralists. But the difference in between China and India is that China is racially much more homogeneous while India is a melting pot of races.
Is there any app which can observe natural face look and determine the near similarities of any certain race/genetics/region ???
There is no such app. That would be preposterous to think that such an app would exist. Somewhat similar techniques were used in Nazi Germany though.
How come there not more (or any) DNA analysis on ancient Dravidian and Indus Valley civilization skeleton types? The Indo Aryan speaking Western Steppe Herders carrying Indo Europeans are by now fairly well studied in their ancestral specimens found throughout Eurasia, but the ancestral Indus Valley genetic profile seems to be lacking in research by comparison. The only paper I've read related to autosomal and/or Y DNA profiles associated w/ the region is a study on the discoveries of Wezmeh cave, in the Iranian Zagros, where a male skeleton tested revealed a Sub-haplogroup previously unknown in other ancient samples, namely G2b, which contributed to some of the ancestral South Asian population groups like Brahui, Pashtun and Kalash. This sub haplotype is in striking contrast of other ancient G-M201 samples, namely the majority of so called Anatolian Farmers and consequently Early European Farmers, who belonged to subclades of Y DNA haplogroup G2a. A clue to the so called 'Iranian Component' in South Asia, might have its roots in the formation of the Bactria Margiana Archeological Complex. (BMAC).
quite frankly, rich europeans funded most of the research into indo-europeans, now indians and other asians will have to fund the research into the other groups.
@@AKumar-co7oe You're saying that these 'rich Europeans' who you claim funded most of the South Asian Archeological research deliberately ignored and/or excluded sites they thought had no IE skeletons and am rail culture? Are you sayin they deliberately ignored viable, Indus Valley, Dravidian/Harappan Civilization specimens?
@@teelurizzo8542 let's first start with the claim that Europeans funded south Asian archaeological research - that is not true - please shove your racial superiority complex up your rectum.
Now that we've established that baseline we can continue the rest of the discussion with the basic understanding that the average European's superiority complex is in no way commensurate with their actual contributions to society
@@teelurizzo8542 there are basic logistical issues, northern samples are better preserved than tropical ones. and historically developing countries have not funded this research to the same degree
@@AKumar-co7oe OK, I understand.
Again in the discussion on ancestral contribution of the DNA of the South Asian Continental. They always forget the 3rd element . The South East Asia and East Asian genetic contribution to the sub continent. Austro Asiatic speaking farmers from the East were present in large numbers the Ganges Bramaputra confluence from at 2500 BC before the Yamnaya Pastorialist. Jharkand East Bihar North Orissa Bengal Assam and the North East were already occupied and the migration from the east and later Tibet was continuous for 3000 years until well into the 17th century.
True, I'm not from India but I am South Asian and I have the East/Southeast Asian component and my haplogroup is also East Asian in origin: Haplogroup O. East Asian-related people have been in South Asia longer than the Steppe pastoralists but they're always forgotten.
You had done a great job. Respect, i want to say one line to all my fellow Indians "We are one"
True..
Nope he said as a colonized western
It's was a language migration from india and Pakistan and Persia to the steppes.Its the otherway round
South India is not
@@Baldwin-pu7pr same
@@Agnostic7773 hmmmm
Ancestral Brew you are amazing man! I appreciate a lot your work, could you do a video on Tibetan people genetics? Actually Tibetans has some unique genes like hémoglobine gene which make them easier to breathe in higher altitude.
He is absolutely wrong about the Steppe and Yamnaya people migrating to India...... And he wholly ignores the OUT OF INDIA THEORY and the latest evidence supporting it
Very interesting.what do you think about ramayanaya episode.
Eskimos and some North American native tribes have similar DNA. They also had to survive thin very cold air.Their DNA often traced to Tibet!
@@mikesheth5370 not at all, they are not even remotely from high altitude/elevation regions
@@sanjayshah7776 it's insane to believe in Aryan invasion but it's outright stupid to believe in out of India theory. Out of India theory conveniently leaves out the fact that R1A which is parent of the subgroup R1A1 has highest diversity in eastern Europe while emphasizing on the fact that R1A1 has highest diversity in India. Then out of India tries to convince you that these Indians went from being highly civilized to being nomadic and tribal in the steppe. As we all know it's generally the opposite but these Indians somehow chose to devolve. One can only find this laughable. Next is convenient use of the yamnaya who were actually R1B which is not found in India.
i like the assumption of how Indian ancestral people were civilized and taught agriculture by horse riding 'Aryans', while in steppe the 'Aryans' lived in stone age.
Indian ansectral people are arya the other one are arys
@@sachinpotdar7798 No Arya means noble. It denotes 'royal' lineage. Not language or ancestry.
Pastoralists conquering Agriculturalists and becoming the elite aristocrats is extremely common in history.
@@raiideas But in genetics it means ancestry.
Keep believing in Marxist theories to satisfy your ego, sure
In kerala , state in southern india, there is legend of Parashu Ram (whose weapon was axe or could be from Persia) who brought his people from the north and inhabited the land that came up from the sea! He had to save his people and take revenge against his fathers(Jamdagni) killer (kshatriya). He is so far a revered figure for the hindus often depicted with curly beard. This could have happend 5000 to 7000 years ago. Unfortunatley we never used to record history, only legends and folk tales survived.
Stop this shit
We (Tyagi or bhumihar brahmin) are the descendants of lord Parashu Ram, I already know this story. So, Basically those brahmins abandon their priesthood and participate in that war become bhumihar brahmin (the one who captured the land) and after the war our ancestors can't go back to priesthood, so our ancestors become farmers.
Bascially every state has different term for them like Tyagi(West UP/Haryana) or bhumihar brahmin (East UP/Bhihar) and likewise every state has some.
@@alkapatel-bu5ej😂
Brahmins in north India still worship Lord Parshuram.
Offending sentiments has become our primary faith now. Internal elements triggered by external funding intended to break the nation from all sects has lead to too much filth which will never get cleaned . Forget parasurama ,We are sitting on a branch and cutting it.
Olá! Onde você achou as imagens dos guerreiros, cita, turco, mongol?
Parecem ser geradas por IA.
Türklerinkini yanlış oluşturmuş,Türklerde Moğollar gibi
Wow man you are to the point. There were migrations world wide at different time periods, but some people in denial mode, i hope this video opens the eye for some. As you said brahmins will have higher R1A hapalogroup than non brahmins.
Brahmins and non brahmins are part of the same group. The warrior class, the business class, the technocrats and artisans are part of the same group. Caste is based on the work they do. Like carpenter caste, gold Smith caste, fisherman caste etc.
@@user-uh1di7de6kThere you go 😂😂😂 Thanks for your lesson bro. Don't you know brahmins are born from the head of Brahma and they have top brain in the world. Try telling them that they are the same group as other non brahmins 😂😂😂😂😂
I can even show you examples of tribals having higher R1a frequency compared to many Brahmins if you don't pick data honestly.
@@kumarashura6621 which tribal is that bro?
@@eniyathendral2728 chenchu tribe. I believe there are more tribals.
Wonderful video.Just curious whether you have the genome admixture based on states or regions in India?
Your content and depth of information is excellent. It’s too good for such low resolution images and distorted audio.
4:04 best of steppe warriors 🇲🇳❤️
Nope
Most Mongol army was Turkic ;)
@@papazataklaattiranimam just the opposite . Most Turkish army was mongol .
asians are thre greatest race on earth
Stop using these types of propaganda words like Indo-Aryan & Dravidian. Now everybody know they are all made up theories. There is no such thigh as Indo-Aryan & Dravidian. DNA wise we are originally Bhartiya Vedica civilization.
Yes outsiders always wanted to divide india especially Europeans
Some and may be most of the Bengali also have Chinese DNA
Nobody use term indo Chinese like that stuff.
Beacuse they don't came in their propaganda
Which AI do you use for the portraits? They are beautiful!
Well, that spun my head around. India has such a large admixture! I would still like a finer breakdown of the Dravidians, please? I am interested in their connections to Sumer.
My compliments to the chef, a wonderful report.
My pure Tamil uncle and cousins are always mistaken for Syrian, Iranian or Arabs.
Oh so indus valley related poplations migrated southwards which is why Telugus, Kannadigas, Malayalis and Tamils have high indus valley ancestry like you said in 2:30
A very interesting clip. I m very curious to learn more about the Jat. Thracians had a tribe called Getai. That name was transcribed by the Greeks who don't have the J sound, just G. Jat has J not G. Besides the Massagetae were E of Iran. Could all three be related? Getai, Massagetae and Jats? Do Jats have their own language?
Yes we jats are related to messi getae, zutts( which were the the jats migrated to middle east) and getae .
I got my 23andme ancestry done and they have similar feedback, Tibetan haplogroup on mother’s side and Ukrainian/Norwegian on father side. For my wife it was Sardinian and Syrian and the immigration happened within last 1000 years
can u do 23andme in india ?
@@KJ_1611 I don’t know about India, had mine done in the US
Darn that's diverse
I've reviewed several of your video clips and am learning a lot. Many populations have had circular histories - out of Africa, then back into the continent, and from there into and out of other regions. I was confused by your narrative about the Iranian origin 1:48/9. It might have been because of the conjunction "but." Aren't the Zagrosian farmers of the Iranian Plateau "Iranian-related"?
This youtuber has just half baked knowledge of genetics. Pushing "Iranian" narrative in every video.
The "back into the continent" parts of the "out of Africa, then back into the continent" theories in some of the videos are not entirely accurate. Apart from the series of conquests by the Persians, Greeks, and Romans, the largest migration into Africa occurred in the mid-7th century when the Arabs invaded North Africa to spread Islam. This invasion resulted in the displacement of much of the indigenous population. Additionally, between the 16th and 18th centuries, the Barbary slave trade brought many European slaves and concubines into North Africa. As for the migration of various ethnic groups into India, I don't know whether any of the process was peaceful or not.
Haryanvi Jat who travelled more than 50 countries, throughout my travel i have been mistaken for Iranian, Tunisian, Egyptian, Romanian, Kashmiri, Punjabi, even some Korean thought i looked like a Korean actor... 🤷🏻♂️
You dont look like korean actor brother.. you look way better than them. We haryanvis are built different with the blessings of lord shiv
@@574-shivam6 Thankyou bhai.
I am Brahmin & once a German tourist said that I have facial features very similar to that of Germans,all my brahman,jaat,gujjar,ahir,thakur friends are fair-skinned & long skulled.
@@Aryaman_mishra775 When I was in Leh Ladakh, a German tourist couple said that in Italy, there are a lot of boys who look like you. Infact there was another Italian tourist in the 4 by 4 from leh to srinagar by road. They said I looked more Italian than the Italian himself, we had a good laugh about it, he had got tanned from extensive travel in Ladakh. I had an Army crew cut and that time and used to do modelling. On my visit to Italy, I realised what they said was indeed true.
@@AshishAntil it's crazy to think how people from different cultures & civilization can share same ancestors.
Your videos are great. And the Austro-alien accent makes it even better
India and Greece, Italy has the same history about the migration of Indo European
The first people of Greece are neolithic Anatolians farmers (J2 DNA) and Mediterranean Pelasgians (E-v13 DNA). They are the one who built the Mycenean civilization( take note they already adopted the Hellenic language because of Greek/Hellenic stocks just in their North), and in Italy especially south have high Anatolians E J2 DNA Haplo group tribes. Around bronze age this civilization collapse due to invasions/migrations of the Indo European Hellenic people/Proto Greeks stocks, italic Romans this people where nomadics war like people like Aryans, they worshiping multiple Indo European Gods and Thunder God like Zeus, Jupiter, Indra... This Hellenic people direct decendants where the Doric Greeks( Sparta and Maccedonians, DNA Haplo R).
Herodotus classified 3 ethnicity of Greeks in ancient Greece this are
Dorics- Indo European Hellenic (Sparta and Maccedonians)
Ionics - Hellenized Anatolians (Athenians etc)
Aeolians - hellenized Pelasgians (Thessalians etc)
More related with western indo european tribes or something?
@@backonrun626nope its R1a... The ancient Indo European Hellenic carry R1a like Aryans... They are the ancient maccedonians
Eastern Indo European
@@skylinelover9276your comments are more practical.
There's a theory that the Greek and Indo-Iranian languages split from a hypothesized Graeco-Aryan language. This implies that the ancestral speakers of Greek and Indo-Iranian (which includes the Indo-Aryan languages of India) languages were one and the same people. Over time these groups split and moved southwest and southeast from the Central Asian steppe to mix with the Pre-Indo-European peoples of their respective destinations. This means that Greeks and Indians likely have more recent shared ancestry than they do with other European or West Asian groups.
Perhaps the arrival of Alexander into India in 323 BCE was not so much an invasion as the magnetic pull of ancient shared ancestry pulling two related descendants together!
Good video bro...keep up the good work.
WhaTeverrr 😂, Im a proud Hindustani , an Indian
We stopped these racial talks ten years ago, we now address ourselves as Indians
You bringing these conversations back is not gonna change the fact that we are one
I can't believe Punjabi is saying that who always brags about Khalistan.
well, I appreciate it.
which india are you living in bro?, i still see racist Indian everywhere
@@Personalitycoper touch grass kid
What dna test is the best to do ?
Thanks for the fascinating info, great channel
I didn't know the world's ancestors were all supermodels.
Lol AI
I'm an Indian from Goa and my genetic markups are North Indian, Iranian, Central Asian, West Asian and Sephardic Jewish.
you tested with myheritage didn't you?
Please don't do that brother, myheritage is Israeli company they give all them some jews
Goa was changed due to Portuguese invasion
@@Lol81913
😂😂
From where u tested I too wanna to test tell me the details like name of the test?
I have done my genetic test via Ancestry DNA. How can you help with further analysis. I will gladly share the results for some insights into migrations, ancestor admixtures during neolithic, iron age etc. I hail from Brahmin family of SouthIndia but have knowledge that we hail from North India since our group is called Northerners in Kannada. Let me know!
Many Brahmin castes of Tamilnadu trace their ancestry to North India. They have genealogical charts to prove. If you dig more than 14 th generation! Don't mean to say that all Brahmin castes migrated some 500 years ago. Same is true about Brahmins of Gujarat and Bengal!
As far as I know all DNA tests are not equal. For Indian DNAs there are special data centres where they use different data bank.
If I share my DNA data, would you be able to say what Y-Haplogroup my Male genes belong to?
whats your Y haplogroup?@@supreethvasisht2451
@@supreethvasisht2451 probably R1a
bro what about Nepalese, I am a nepalese and ever since i was born i used to look like European and people were confused as well but since im getting older and older im 20 almost i have beard and almost darker hair but in my child hood i used to have brown blondish hair and I looke like a middle eastern /iranian now and some people tell me that. Could u make a video on Aryans of indian and nepal and who their ancestors are??
It is understandable if you look around some features are so complex. My father God rest his soul was white . Yes his family was from British India. My mom was Persian ancestry of old like Samakand or vicinity but both were from indian subcontinent . It is said we have many diverse pool of gene in us. Thank you for the updates.❤
Now As Southern Arc released, Now Indo-europian originated from modern day Georgia instead of Steppie Culture(south Ukraine), still waiting when they will found 7000 year old skeleton of person who has first mutation of R1a1 Heplogroup and its found in India. Usually High diversity of Heplogroup means possible origin place and India got this cover.
Thank you for keeping it short and sweet mindful of viewer attention span. This is such a dry topic and difficult to keep the focus for 20 min (many youtubers are 20 min long and I end up fast forwarding).
Ok video but I think you should have mentioned that AASI are Basal East Eurasian actually.
A lot of people I see are thinking that they are directly African Tribals
Yes aasi is 65% east
Rest west
They are directly migrated from Africa and called Eastern Non African as well.
They are closely related to upper paleolithic populations in Siberia and Europe. Could be an ancient relic population before Eastern/western split
@@saanjanibaar8085veryone migrated from Africa bro.
Whats your point.
AASI are split from population which formed modern day- East Asian and South East Asian
@@reddragon100 Yup they migrated directly from Africa as well, via the Middle East into South Asia.
AASI split from the East Eurasian meta-population, or Eastern Non-African population, only shortly after they split from the common Eurasian Ancestry.
There was a continent called Kumari Kandham from which human civilization originated. But it later sank in the Indian Ocean.
Give back Central Asia... It's hindu land... Har har mahadev
Haha i don't think the uzbeks, tajiks etc will agree to this.
Central Asia was called Aryan bhoomi.. Indra lok.. Devraj Indra lived there... Due to you Mongols attacks Aryans settled in Iran and Indiana... Bharatvarsh... Har har mahadev..
@@Romantic-yu2dr Do you know honestly how far back in history that is? If everyone started claiming each other's lands on historical basis it'd be chaos
@@Romantic-yu2drunpar gawar phone rak or parne ja bharat ka nam kharap kar raka he tu logone
@@Ubermench-uy7dw Har har mahadev... Thanks to our ancestors.. We are Hindus... People in Today Central Asia are becoming secular.. Look Turkey is already secular... Kazakhi are becoming secular...
Loving the AoM music in the background. Very soothing
It's the Age of Empires music.
Just fascinating stuff. Thank you.
India is not going anywhere, but India is everywhere.
The Croatians came from India. 60% of Croatian is Sanskrit. 30% bramin DNA. There is a town on Croatia called Kali. Croatians call themselves Hrvati. This name came from Iran. Before that they were the Saraswati.
Low IQ
Kali in Slavic languages means a place of fishermen and sailors. They are Slav
@@Ubermench-uy7dwthey learnt sanskrit. No one went outside india.
Your channel is so fascinating! Could you do Syria in the future id love to see what’s in my blood lol
how to check this?
Indo-Aryans are more aggressive and better looking than the Dravidians. But, the Dravidian are more cultured and more intelligent.
Lol😂
Looks are subjective and conditioned.
I simply and politely disagree
Iam bengal and South Indian in my ancestors dna 🧬 result 🙏🏼
i am indian Bengali took DNA test from 23and me it showed 55persouth asian 25percent south east east asian10percent Scandinavian10percentwest asiant is Scandinavian means steppe yamnaya????
Bengalis live in east India bordering Myanmar, so having 5 to 18 percent Myanmar and East Asian ancestry is common in bengal. The scandanavian part is not actually Scandinavian ancestry, it’s ancient indo aryan ancestry from indo aryan migration to India 3500 to 4000 years back. The Brahmins in Bengal have around 15 to 18 percent, so there is probably some brahmin ancestry. Also, Indians don’t have yamnaya ancestry. We have sintasthta ancestry related to Russians and polish people.ajit agarkar is the example
Yes, Scandinavian means Steppe Yamnaya People. Scandinavian have an extremely high precentage of this, so it gets classified as the Scandinavian ethnic group. It is "easier" than Saying that Scandinavians are 100% South Asian.
Triggered Hindu nationalists in 3, 2, 1... we have been here for 3 million years...😊
shame on you
They are already manipulated by Western media and western propaganda@@Jay-qu4ps
Fantastic video. So much info from Yamnaya to their tie in etc. Iranians also have their DNA in Western Indian peoples is not a shock. Interestingly the Romanian people DNA was found in large percent in the Rajasthani Banjaran nomadic peoples which makes sense because those nomads ended up wandering to India and settling there
@thezoldics7648 there's zero evidence of that. Did you not watch the video or do any research? Indians were never explorers and never ventured out of India. The Greeks and Persians and others regularly visited India for trade and it is possible many settled in India or forced Indian women to bear their kids leading to gene pool from there getting introduced into India. There's no mention of any of these regions in any Indian texts but reverse is true. And aryans of central Asia came to India and became the new Indians. These same aryans also moved west to Europe. India was always conquered and never the conqueror so how is what youre claiming even remotely possible? Esp when DNA evidence clearly shows Indian DNA has later revision markers proving that Aryans took over and became Indians with their culture and language (sanskrit)
@fr9714 forget the video did you do any research, read the link I sent.
@@fr9714that's absolute nonsense and yóu should study more about India's population diversity as well as history instead of making passive aggressive blanket statements that is hilarious to all Indians and population geneticists,
Indians migrating outwards and settling down in different parts of the world as well as marrying local women there is literally a world renowned phenomenon, Xerses literally has his tomb decorated with loyal Indian soldiers of him that sacrificed themselves fighting for him, Armenia has history of Indian warriors caught in a power struggle with the locals, Greeks watched an Indian ascetic ímmolate himself to showcase his religious devotion that literally turned into a legend among Greek Scholars
yes except for Chola empire's expansion into East Asia there are not as many expeditions outward into north west from India but that was because majority of Indian Empires have largely been centered into mainland India which is the Indo Gangatic Plains, it was a huge stretch of land to keep hold of once yóu're empire starts to border with coastal kingdoms in south to all the way to the Kabul river in north like the Mauryans, Shunga and Gupt Empire had but Indians were travelling to all other places in as much frequency as the other nations were
But even then the modern dna studies show no signs of Greek or European dna, what does exist is classified as ANI population dna that showed up the subcontinent around 4500 years ago which today is generally accepted to have arrived from around some place east of Caspian sea,
Yóu just mistook ANI population for European or Persian dna when yóu said Aryans became new Indians,
What actually happened was multiple waves of caucasian migrations happened throught the time period of 3000 to 900 BCE, Vedic Aryans were earliest of the settlers who were followed up by BMAC population groups and then the Scythians, India was never "conquered", portions of it did face occupations from foreign rulers but the only group of foreign occupants to have ever ruled the entirety of India were British,
Greeks and Persians came after Vedic Aryans had arrived and Indian subcontinent was virtually a Hindu land dominated by upper caste Hindus that posses higher frequency of Vedic Aryan dna, the Greeks and other invaders after them were confronted by these Aryans, furthermore these Aryan nobles in India had a booming séx slàve trade with the Romans and Greeks, the Greek and Roman women were known as Yavanis and were bought and sold and married amongst, so there goes yóur confused presumption about Indian women being forced to bear Greek and Persian children when it's the other way around
The historical references mention about Indo Aryans in this video are wrong. Yamnaya are not Indo-Aryans. This Analysis of molecular variance(AMOVA) test results shows that Aryans(Brahmins) had genetic(Y-haplogroup R1a1*) affinities with several foreign populations of Central Asia and Europe.
The Yamnaya(Y-haplogroup R1b) culture was a late Copper Age to early Bronze Age archaeological culture of the region between the Southern Bug, Dniester, and Ural rivers, dating to 3300-2600 BC.
Based on archaeological evidence and genetic evidence Yamnaya invade europe, massacred all the males and impregnated the women in order to rapidly further their bloodlines. The Aryans(Brahmins) who could not withstand this brutal attack gradually migrated from Europe to Asia as refugees and settled in the Gangetic plains of India.
no Romanian people DNA is found in Rajasthani Banjara tribe. The only people of Romania who share DNA similarity with Rajasthani Banjara tribe are the Roma people who are known to have migrated out of India hundreds of years ago. They are also called Gypsy and Romanis. not supporting the bogus Out of India theory but around 1000 years ago Indians migrated west towards Levant and Europe.
Also no Iranian DNA is found in West Indian people. The time when Iranian valley people came to India, modern Iranians didn't exist. The same Aryans that came to India, took a left and entered Iran too. Those aryans mixed with the same Iranian valley people and gave birth to ancient Iranians who spoke Avestan. The only reason they are called Iranian related or Iranian farmers is because they lived in Iran. Modern Indians and modern Iranian came into existence at the same time side by side.
The generalization that most North Indian Brahmin have higher Aryan DNA is wrong thing. A research paper suggesting such findings which is far away from Ground reality is a wrong reference.
I will give you example of my own family. I've a much fairer complexion in my paternal family (from Uttar Pradesh). Because my maternal family has Ancestory from Kashmir (a colder place)
My friend with similar surname "Sharma" from Bihar is a Dark complexioned person. It appears he has high amount of Australoid characters. Bihar is a land rich of Tribal communities.
Brahmins are diverse genetically
This is so cool bro 👌
Fatyanova are the ancient Iranians before they split from the Kurgan tribes, they migrated and many of their descendants migrated to other regions and became Abashevo, Sintashta, Androvnova, Srubnaya. Androvnova migrated south to Afghanistan and met the bmac people, and in India they met the Hidus Valley civilization,
The Sintashta and Andronovo are clearly Indo-Iranians. The Fatyanovo and Abashevo can be regarded as proto-Indo-Iranians. The Fatyanovo represented the very beginnings of the Indo-Iranian peoples' split away from the Corded Ware Culture.
There were also Scythians who came about 2000 years ago and mixed with the North Indians
Idk how similar to Aryan they were
Yamnaya contributed no direct ancestry to Indo-Aryans, who were the offshoot of the eastern Corded Ware of the forest-steppe and founders of Sintashta culture which originated the chariot
Great research...
Are you scientist?
Just curious to know your educational background.
Love your amazing work on this topic. 👍
Can you make a video about the Bangla DNA 😊
There is North Indians who are darker than South Indians. Also for indian tamil and Sri lankan tamil , it's easy to differentiante between each other. They are not the same. Most indian tamils living in Tamil Nadu are anti hindu . This is due politics and Dravidian movement. Whereas in Sri Lanka, there is no Dravidian movement. Most Sri Lankan tamil are religious. The caste system, culture, tradition, customs within the Sri Lankan tamil community is different from indian tamil. Most Sri Lankan tamil don't identify with indian tamils. Also there is brahmins who are ways darker than Dalits. Colorism has nothing to do with caste system. Colonization does.
Both ASI and ANI are indian orgin DNA. Aryan means humble and noble people in Sanskrit. People living in Indian subcontinent are known as Aryans. Its not a race.
No one outside of Indian politics believes this.
@@Procopius464ven if the Aryans you talk about are from outside, the "Arya" in the Vedas are still native to India
@@bhuvan_357_5 Perhaps, but the original civilization of northern India was the Indus Valley Culture, not the Vedic culture. I think Balgangadhar Tilak is probably correct, and the ancient homeland of the Vedic Aryans was the Arctic. It was probably climate change that pushed them south.
@@bhuvan_357_5 nope. Vedas are how Aryans invaded this land. There's nothing native in Vedas. And there were civilisation in this subcontinent before the vedas.
@@sarathkumars7962 vedas was made in indian subcontinent not from artic🤣. which missionary school have you studied
Excellently explained in a short time, very good job.
My favorite bit of new research is that SANSKRIT IS FOREIGN TO INDIA possibly introduced during the indo aryan migration.
All indo European languages are foreign to everyone except Russians and Ukrainians.
The complex grammar of Sanskrit doesnt exist outside India.
Yes establishing this is the dream for every Western academics.
Essentially yes Sanskrit and vedic civilizations are foreign as others. The closest to Native is the non Vedic belief system that barely exist today in South India
Sanskrit was still formed in India as a scholarly language, it was not a certain group's native language that "was brought". It didn't exist before Aryans were in India
Nice video but just am kind of confused, as when these Iranian/ Indo-Aryan migrations took place into India, how did people of a completely different culture, language, religion & race easily dated & marry each other if that's the case, especially in such large numbers (as there are 1.4 Billion Indians today)?
If you compare to the 1 Billion 🕉Hindus of 🇮🇳 India today in 2023, most of them still not only are against foreign weddings or even inter-state weddings within the same country, but also strictly against not marrying to anyone outside their caste, even if they share the same Hindu religion in the same state in the same country even in 2023.
So just wanted to ask you to know about different cultures like the Iranians and Aryans & how they intermarried with the indigenous Indians in large numbers so easily?
the thing that you underestimate
is the fact of forceful child baring by the conquerers and also the fact that conquerers have prestige in society
im iranian
when turks and mongols attacked iran they graped alot and thats why 5 % of iranian dna is turku mongol and the other fact was khans were prestigious and had conqubines while an average farmer man would die in war and would have no child
thats how genes spread back in the day
iran and india are very close in terms of genetics and they were close culturally before islam and we also had cast system
but after islam our cultures differed alot
pakistan is like a middle ground between iranian and indian culture and gene and language
like half their word is persian
Well said , all this looks propoganda
That is today during the sultanate era this practice came up... during the sultanate rule the more lighter you are in skin color you were given jobs by the sultans. but before that Indians did intermarry with each other for example my Group is basically Sudra in Paternal side and Brahmin in Maternal side. by your logic my Jatti would not have existed and I am a Telugu btw... my Maternal Side comes from a Group of Uttar Pradesh Brahmins. my Group is called the Andhra. in South it was a Common Term to be called Sat-Sudras who are Descendants of Brahmins and Sudras. in India there are many Jatti's who are Sat-Sudras. Sat-Sudras were the ruling class you can even notice today. Nair, Reddy, Naidu, Thevar etc... these are Sat-Sudras who will be lighter than your average South Indian.
Simple their is only darmic religions in that period abrahamic religion are relatively new
So these migrations happen over large periods of time, some of the first people to reach India was about 60,000 years ago, then you would have had different waves of people, who would have set up different communities, most people due to need, would learn to communicate and trade , for example we know of monks from China who would have come into India during Buddhist period with no local language ,and still lived and traded, of course there would have also been fights etc as described above, also ancient India stretches from near Afghan regions down to south India , meaning bigger then Europe, so it's not like every day they came into contact, and so as settlements grew so did language and trade , Indus valley is the oldest civilization found , but not the only , as we know other parts of India were also inhabited, with its own customs , modern dna only got restricted during 16ty century onwards as books speaking against changing and inter caste marriage , this was further exploited during Mughal and British rule and we now have the bagged left today, but still if India was to do a DNA test we would soon see the mixing that has occured and hopefully drop the dumb notions of separate people
You took dna analysis from Gujarat but majority of people in gujarat are not even native for example patel or patidar ancestors are from pamir highland near by river amu
5:45 sorry to tell you but this pic is from the Rai community from India (majority in North east) and Nepal
Its my understanding that these Step peoples also went into Europe. They also brought animal husbandry and agriculture to the Hunter Gather culture of thst region as well. Very interesting.
This video makes sense - for most of Indian history, it was a stable agriculturally rich country that frequently culminated in big civilizations that drew migrants from all over. Sometimes the migration was heavy (like the Steppe invasion), but for most of history, it was a constant but manageable flow inward of people/DNA.
God I am pretty sure the comment sections would be very nice and open minded especially the Hindu nationalist 😅
Stop spreading your neo Nazi propaganda here
Evidence against the Aryan Invasion Theory
1. Refutation of AIT’s dating of Rig Veda
Rig Veda, Bharat’s foundational scriptural text, contains numerous references to the Sarasvati River, which is variously described as the “greatest of rivers,” “glorious,” “loud roaring,” and “mother of floods.
However, the Sarasvati River was nowhere to be found until recently, when modern satellite imagery was able to locate the dry bed that once was this mighty river .
Studies have also shown that monsoon declined monotonically after 5,000 BCE, gradually weakening the Sarasvati, leading to its virtual extinction by around 1,500 BCE .
This completely debunks the AIT account that Rig Veda was composed after the purported Aryan invasion/migration circa 1,500 BCE and indicates that it was composed closer to 5,000 BCE when the river was in its prime .
2.The number of Sanskrit manuscripts in existence today is roughly 1000 times the number of manuscripts available in Greek, Latin, and other ancient European languages combined. Such an overwhelming disparity in the literary outputs between the Aryans and the Europeans is difficult to reconcile with the AIT postulation of their shared heritage
3.new scientific studies says that the R1a genome has it’s oldest presence in the South Asia (particularly in South India) and it has been found that the R1a is found in higher percentages in ancient South Indian tribes like Chenchus, Valmiki communities in Andhra Pradesh & Kallar tribes in Tamilnadu. Chenchu’s have the highest diversity factor & the occurence of R1a in Chenchus is 27% which is higher than that of Iranians & Eastern Europeans indicating that the genome related to R1a haplogroup moved out from India & entered Iran, Europe.
@@human8454 thanks for bursting his fake narrative
Don't forget your indian hindu forefathers 😁🤭
@@Jagannath38103 cow worship was common among IVC people
Uh selected wrong picture for Rors . 🙂
We are all same people! Amazing!
Interesting video. I am Indian Gujarati and got 5% Greece, 3% east Slavic Russian, 2% Scandinavia. Also, 9% Indus valley and 3% Anatolia, Armenia and Mesopotamia on ftDNA's ancestry test.
My maternal haplogroup is W3a1b which was found in Shahr i Sokhtah mummies in east Iran and and in Swat valley. Recently, female W3a1b was found to be one of the key drivers of Bronze age indo-Aryan steppe migrations.
You are lying 🤣🤣
ftdna is pretty crap, why didn't you do 23andme or ancestry test?
@@ompaik2863
Someone sounds bitter.
@@hijazlanderftdna is better than 23andme. Ancestry components are broken down better on myorigins 3.0. I get 78% overall Asian and rest is European and trace middle eastern which translates the same over on my gedmatch Harappa.
@@ompaik2863yeah nothing to lie about. I posted my results years ago.
The genetic diversity of India is widely recognized and its representation is commendable. However, it is advisable to exercise caution in sharing your genetic sample with unknown individuals or company outside of your own home county. Your individual genome is akin to a personal ID; as technology advances, there is a risk of misuse of this data. Such actions could potentially have adverse consequences in the future.
could you explain some disadvantages ? Other than chemically engineering some poison that will only work with our dna or smth similar.
I can think of this, one can analyse what kinds of addictions we are susceptible to and companies might misuse this to sell us those products. Can you think of others ?Im genuinely curious.
@@aneeshprasobhan There are many potential disadvantages and risks associated with sharing genetic data.
1) Genetic data can reveal highly personal information, not about the individual but about their own relatives. This can easily be misused by people and companies, for example, insurance companies who easily predict possible diseases which can come at a certain age, by that individual and relative can slightly
2) Gentic can reveal massive amounts about a person and relatives. If it's common for everyone, it can quickly discriminate among people. This could occur in various settings such as employment and insurance and even in social life
3) Another one is the misinterpretation of data with companies. As you know, there are many data analysis biases; all information that we get today is certain statistical and mathematical assumptions with skewed data. If when individuals access this information without proper counselling from genetic professionals. This might lead to unnecessary alarm or misguided health decisions if you plan to do genomic data analysis and get to know your biological codes.
4) In a broader societal context, genetic data could be used for surveillance or profiling purposes, raising significant ethical concerns about personal freedom and autonomy
5) Data ownership and control. For example, if you send your DNA sample to an unknown person, such as this TH-camr, he can easily hack into other information from your samples by sequencing everything. This means you are sending all of your information to an unknown person, and he/she can sell this to a company and get money from it without putting any effort or following ethical rules of nucleic acid data
6) Ethical and legal concerns (Major issue): The use of genetic data raises various ethical questions, such as consent (especially in the case of minors or unable to consent), the right to know or not know one's genetic makeup, and how this data should be used in research and medicine.
Latest research suggests the migration of the corded ware people migrated out of Europe back into the steppes and then into India.
it wasn't a steppe pasturalist society as must as a mixed group.
it was the later corded ware that spread the majority of indo european language groups.
Why dont you make a series on india.
Yamanya invasion happens in Europe brother which completly changs it's demography and the whole Aryan invasion theory which you are talking about has been proved wrong 😅
No it hasn't.
Where did he say it's an Aryan invasion?
It is migration not invasion OK
World is one family
Yet there is so much racism especially towards south asians more specifically to Indians due to bad stereotypes in today’s western society. That will change soon inshallah
So sorry, the video does mention our Tibeto-Burmese bits from around 5:00
Thanks.
Awesome vid
AASI DNA increases as you go from west to east and north to south in India.Eg,an avg odia/bengali/jharkhandi have more AASI than gujarati/rajasthani.An average south Indian/Maharashtrian have more AASI dna than average haryana or Punjab people.
Maharashtrian and Bengali brahmins has highest amount of Indo Aryan and Iranian genetics
@@DannycageGhostrider I am talking about average people not brahmins.Brahmins surely do have higher caucasoid ancestry than average population
@@gouthamkrishnan6718 not all brahmans. Tamil Gujarati Telugu and many other Brahman communities have a lower amount of Indo Aryan genetics compared to some schedule caste groups of North India
@@DannycageGhostrider I am not talking about steppe/aryan ancestry,I am talking about caucasoid ancestry.Aryans aren't the only caucasoids who migrated to India.South and gujarati brahmins have higher iran neolithic ancestry despite having lower steppe ancestry.
The historical references mention about Indo Aryans in this video are wrong. Yamnaya are not Indo-Aryans. This Analysis of molecular variance(AMOVA) test results shows that Aryans(Brahmins) had genetic(Y-haplogroup R1a1*) affinities with several foreign populations of Central Asia and Europe.
The Yamnaya(Y-haplogroup R1b) culture was a late Copper Age to early Bronze Age archaeological culture of the region between the Southern Bug, Dniester, and Ural rivers, dating to 3300-2600 BC.
Based on archaeological evidence and genetic evidence Yamnaya invade europe, massacred all the males and impregnated the women in order to rapidly further their bloodlines. The Aryans(Brahmins) who could not withstand this brutal attack gradually migrated from Europe to Asia as refugees and settled in the Gangetic plains of India. No archaeological evidence of Aryans(Brahmins) living in the Indus Valley Civilization(2500-1700 BCE) has been found so far, so it is assumed that they may have entered the Indian Plain at the end of the Indus Valley Civilization.
0:23 108% 😮
😂
Fascinating ❤thank you.
In India 🇮🇳,there is a hot topic of Aryan invasion theory but the fact is proved that all Indians have same ancestory of Indus valley civilization people but by the course of time some Aryans mixed with North Indians because north India borders central Asia. So saying that all North Indians are Aryans and South Indians are Dravidian is a stupidity because north Indians have majority genes of Indus valley people.
If they just mixed then why all of north india speak indo european languages? And why only upper cast people have more aryan dna than lower cast people
@@Ancienthistoryperson According to your logic a person who speaks English is also belongs to Aryan race .😂🤣
@@dhirendrasingh1382 indo aryans migrated to Europe...then their decendents went to british ilands... English people do have indo European dna
@@Ancienthistoryperson But there is no lo logic of speaking an Aryan language and belonging to Aryan race.
The historical references mention about Indo Aryans in this video are wrong. Yamnaya are not Indo-Aryans. This Analysis of molecular variance(AMOVA) test results shows that Aryans(Brahmins) had genetic(Y-haplogroup R1a1*) affinities with several foreign populations of Central Asia and Europe.
The Yamnaya(Y-haplogroup R1b) culture was a late Copper Age to early Bronze Age archaeological culture of the region between the Southern Bug, Dniester, and Ural rivers, dating to 3300-2600 BC.
Aryans were not invaders. Based on archaeological evidence and genetic evidence Yamnaya invade europe, massacred all the males and impregnated the women in order to rapidly further their bloodlines. The Aryans(Brahmins) who could not withstand this brutal attack gradually migrated from Europe to Asia as refugees and settled in the Gangetic plains of India. No archaeological evidence of Aryans(Brahmins) living in the Indus Valley Civilization(2500-1700 BCE) has been found so far, so it is assumed that they may have entered the Indian Plain at the end of the Indus Valley Civilization.
Dravidians are believed to have been those Neolithic Iranian farmers from the Zagros region who settled in the Indus Valley civilization...Maybe linked to Y haplogroup J2...They intermixed with the AASI
Ancient Ancestral South Indian is linked to Y haplogroup C - M130, which is typically associated with the first wave out of Africa.
C, this first wave OOA also splits to Europe, Mongolia, Japan and the Americas
Dravidians are haplogroup H a totally different genetical mark up than rest of humanity
@@tomorrow. Dravidians are associated Y Haplogroup C - M130, F, G, H, J2, K, L and R2...What the fuck do you know man?? 😅
@@tomorrow.H and IJK(which is very large haplogroup family) are the direct descendants of HIJK haplogroups
Yamnaya were half CHG. And CHg and Iran N were related. So we do not know the cultural transmission between Iran N and CHG before formation of yamnaya horizon yet.
What's the skin color of the people who migrated from Iran to India who formed the AASI?
I am actually surprised by how accurate this video is. Most people think of Indian ancestry as a dichotomy when it actually is a trichotomy or even a quaternary in some cases (such as in the eastern regions of the subcontinent, where the influence East Asian-related ancestry occurs more frequently). As someone who has been reading up on and keeping up with the science of the genetic history of the Indian subcontinent, you have done an excellent job. I am a Jat from the Punjab, I have R1a1a as my paternal haplogroup, and I have blue-eyes. I assume I inherited these traits from Steppe pastoralist forebearers.
You're mixed lol
@@ralph6417 True, I'm half-European but a lot of my full-blooded Indian relatives have coloured eyes, such as hazel, blue, or green.
@@mgill1996
Phenotype sub specifically
@@ralph6417 Small world!
Interesting!
Actually, genealogical experts have found as much as 10 percent Han Chinese ancestry amongst some people of Western Indian origin, specifically Gujarati.
Perhaps this came from the Mongol and/or Turkic invasions.
Brahmins have higher steppe ancestry than most of Khatris and Kambojs otoh they tend to have higher AASI as well although only around 5% extra.
it's possible that the brahmins are from the original migration and khatris/kambojs came in later from central asia?
Bro my opinion has changed now. Iranian Neolithic or zargosian farmer related ancestory is ARYAN.
Great precise video
Since indo aryans originated in a more challenging environment ( colder and harsher ) they had more preferred genetic characteristics. So in any country we can see preferred genetic characteristics more abundantly amoung privilaged or more powerful groups. In India it would be the brahmins and kshatriyas
2:02 from the line diagram which was taken from the study of Indus valley people clearly shows that the Iranian farmers were actually not farmers but just people who migrated from Iranian plateau and there was no mixing with Iranian farmers. This caveat in history also proves that farming in India was independently invented much like in Anatolia, Ancient China and Mesoamerica.
The people that came from the zagros to Indus where Iranian hunter gatherers, who later found farming through exchange of ideas with their Mesopotamian ancestors.
@@jancyvargheese5351 there is a good 2000-3000 years gap between Iranian hunter gathers entering India and the advent of farming in Anatolia. There is no dna exchange after the invention of the invention of farming. Look at the graph at the time stamp. That should clear the doubt.
Also, I don't think before Indus valley there was any exchange of ideas without the exchange of people. Also I don't think the Iranian hunter gathers saw Iranian farmers as their ancestors.
@@islandsunset iam not talking about anatolia, which is in Turkey. Iam talking about mesapotamia, which is Iraq. The Indus civilization traded with their brothers in Iraq, and even with the Egyptians. The Indus people even went to central Asian bmac sites like shahr shota or something. They exchanged materials and ideas that way
@@jancyvargheese5351 no refuting that but farming was developed in Anatolia and then moved to Mesopotamia.
Also a civilization as big as Indus Valley needed large-scale agriculture to develop first. An agrarian society can support an urban society. Farming developed way before Indus Valley Civilization came into existence.
Just so you know, INDIAN DNA SHOWS PERSIA (most north Indian dna) along with Central asian.
So, the evidence is speaking against your comment