Murder on the Orient Express (2017) - Let Me Explain
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- here's who killed the dude who got killed
►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►►
let me explain:
-murder on the orient express and the twist ending
MURDER ON THE ORIENT:
When a murder occurs on the train he's travelling on, celebrated detective Hercule Poirot is recruited to solve the case.
Director: Kenneth Branagh
Writers: Michael Green (screenplay by), Agatha Christie (based upon the novel by)
Stars: Kenneth Branagh, Penélope Cruz, Willem Dafoe, Daisy Ridley
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow Me On
► / theatzshow
► Main Channel: bit.ly/2FGuhl8
► Music Channel: bit.ly/2IPsOdM
► The Podcast: bit.ly/2thqRfB
► Artwork: www.instagram....
Support, Vote and Watch live commentaries over on:
/ theatzshow
1:06 The creator of Poirot, Agatha Christie herself, saw the 1970s original and said that the moustache Poirot had in that was too small, so Kenneth Branagh went overboard just to be sure.
I always know someone in the comments will know and will save me the time XD
impossible Agatha Christie died long before the 70s
She died on 1976...
The moustache was so iconic that it was said it had a personality by itself.
And that's what they did to please her memory? The whole plot is destroyed, showing inaccurate scenes both in the beggining and the ending to make Poirot a giant cliché character which he is not, washing down the plot so it is easier for dumb audiences to understand, including stupid and unnecessary action scenes because Hollywood right, including another stupid racial debate where it doesn't belong and changing a character just for the sake of it, the whole mystery and "the murderer is around us" thing that makes the whole book so awesome putting the plot all around the closed space that is the train is simply scrapped out in the movie... Oh but they got the mustache right!
There is 12 stab wounds and 12 suspects
The ending "everyone is the murderer"
Me: That's GENIUS
But there were 13 suspects , if you count.
@@sachinrajmuktiyup, if i remember correctly, in the novel Helena didnt stab Cassetti
@@bobbychristian231yep, I literally just finished the book and I'm watching this video to see what people think about the ending and you're right, Helena was the only innocent one in the book, because she actually slept all night as his husband said
@@bobbychristian231she doesn’t stab him in the movie either she gets the Count to do it
"This is what he looked like in the seventies..." Shows clip from 2010
Poirot's Mustache exactly what I wanted to say!
Yeah he seems to think the 70's Orient Express and the Poirot are the same thing.
This!
Phew, thought I was the only one who thought this
Yeah, what the hell? Where's Albert Finney?! I'm a movie buff, and annoying a such a person often is, I still want such details to be correct in any case, mainly to avoid confusing aspiring movie buffs. Or... I have as much OCD as Poirot.
1:04 he steps in the poop because every thing has to be balanced and straight. In the end of the movie he says he has learned something. He learned that the scale of justice isn't always balanced. The funny thing is after he gets out of the train he ask the driver to straighten his tie.
"Old habits die hard".
OCD
Jules Romijn OCD maybe?
(Edit: There is a reply above mine that says OCD. Well then.)
Jules Romijn
XD
Took something out of Daisy Ridley's book
"I'm the greatest detective in the world" 👣👣💩💩
took me a few seconds to get it but when i did I laughed haha
The reason they didn't kill him elsewhere or before because they wanted to do it under circumstances where they all would have an excuse to be present (they're traveling), and could prevent anyone outsider from being there, thus preventing anyone innocent from being suspected. So when Ratchett books a trip on a train, they book all the other places in the same sleeping vagoon (or whatever you call it in English). Unfortunately for them another person does turn up in the last minute and want a place in the train, and that another person happens to be friends with the owner of the train company... and he happens to be a private detective. Fate? Oh well, sometimes you need coincidences to have your desired plot.
Besides all of that there's also the thing that they didn't expect the train to be stuck in the snow so this is why Poirot was assigned to the case and knew for sure that the murderer was still in the train
Eugénie Daaé That is actually what happens in the movie too, but it’s very subtle and isn’t explained outright
It's not a coincidence if you take each Agatha Christie novel separately, it's just how the plot sets up. If you take them as a whole, then Poirot is probably the killer because everywhere he goes, someone dies in an elaborately constructed murder.
Nah, that's just the Detective's Curse. Whenever a person who is known for being able to solve murders, mysteries, and murder mysteries is near, people decide then is the perfect time to stage their crime. It's not that they are causing these murders, it's just that murders and crimes follow them no matter where they go.
Also, the circumstances are often such that only X number of people could have possibly committed the crime. Country house, resort spa, train, boat... Like a boat on the *I'lljustpickariveratrandom* Nile.
It's a testament to Christie's skills that the tropes she established have been used countless times since, to the extent that many people don't know that she was the one to create them. For a long time I had no idea she was the first author to have the detective assemble all the possibly guilty people together before revealing the killer(s).
The balancing act these authors play is constructing a murder elaborate enough to be interesting and be difficult or impossible to guess (Do you give away enough information for the reader to guess the killer? When do you do it?), with believably guilty stories for everyone, but not so fantastical that the audience's suspension of disbelief is broken. It's a similar conundrum to the one 'realistic' spy novel authors face.
buuut tbh he is actually that cartoonish in the books, "mon ami" this and "mon cher" that
jinppreciation how is that cartoonish? Not denying poirot is, but mon ami isn't really a cartoonish thing to say in my opinion
Dude..Agatha said herself people should laugh with poirot, not at him
jinppreciation
Parce qu'il est Belge
The moustache is fine, just read the damm book and you will see.
But the accent is wrong, read the damn book
Adamast sorry I couldn't understand what you said because your accent is terrible.
hahaha
Oh my... BURNS!!!
Wtf 😂😂😂😂😂
He needs to step in the poop with his other shoe because he has severe OCD.
In the books he is very fussy about being clean, brushing his clothes etc. He would have immediately cleaned his shoe, definitely would not have stepped in shit a second time.
because you didn’t say it I will,
“listennnn”
I died laughing every time he said “the greatest detective in the world” 😂
In the book he does not ever say that though
@@sarthaks5 he did.
@@maggie198333 when?
@@secrectpirate3096 In The Mystery of the Blue Train
As a fan of Agatha Christy's work, and having not read the book, I was so excited to see this movie and I wasn't disappointed. Phenomenal movie, cast, shots and direction.
Just to add, the personnality of Poirot is supposed to be a Belgian, classy perfectionist. Meticulous and borderline obsessed. And the mustache stuff... I honestly liked it.
I am so hyped to see the sequel.
Murder on the Nile is one hella rollercoaster.
About to start The Crooked House.
if you're a big fan you should probably read the book , because honestly if you do the movie will look like absolute garbage, they pretty much wiped out all of the important details that would guide you as a viewer or in the case of the book a reader to try and discover even find out who the murderer was all for the sake to add a bit of action preventing the movie to be "boring" for the majority of the viewers , i had to sit and torture myself to watch it completely hoping that a single scene would be accurate but oh well was i disapointed
You’re about to get your wish as the sequel is out hope you enjoy it!
*Death* on the Nile
Such a fan, yet you don't know it's Death on the Nile, not Murder on the Nile?
Brannaghs Death on the Nile was very disappointing. More Hollywood garbage
The actor you think is Esteban Julio Ricardo Montoya Dela Rosa Ramirez is actually a Dutchactor named Marwan Kenzari!
Stories with Yasmin Suite life of Zack and Cody reference
@@alanaadonis6196 thank you!
The second you said 12 stab wounds then 12 other passengers... I was like ok it’s all of them.
In the book he has 15 stabs
@@nevyzzz No it’s still 12 in the book because of Colonel Arbuthnot’s suggestion about the significance the number twelve has in regards to a jury, justice, etc. In the book there were 13 suspects, but one [SPOILER] Suspect didn’t actually commit the crime with the rest of them
@@damudkip2115 rlly?
dont care
@@nevyzzz Good for you. Glad you’ve found your truth
@@nevyzzz Then why bother spreading false information? Get a life 🤣
this was actually one of my favourite movies of the year
Jay Allen have you seen the 70's version because i recommend you give them a try (also the newer ones)
My favorite of the year & one of my all-time favorites.
@@julesspits9661 I own the original Orient Express and all the sequels with Peter Ustinov. I also own the complete Margret Rutherford Miss Marple.
It was enjoyable despite all the awful flaws in the filmmaking. Their sequel on the Nile was dreadful garbage
Everyone should watch the david suchet poirot adaptations especially the abc murders
I actually liked this movie. I was intrigued the whole time, the costume/production design was great, the cinematography is beautiful, the acting is fantastic, etc. I can't wait for "Death On the Nile".
I enjoyed this movie despite its flaws. Death on the Nile was awful garbage. Dreadful
The flashback video you showed is not albert finney (74), it is Poirot by David Suchet, which was done in 2010).
THANK YOU! I was practically yelling at my computer when that came on! Someone who knows at last!
Yes! he started his role as Hercule Poirot in 1989.
I'm a kid and I read the book and watched the 70's adaptation thank you very much.
MillyTheDinosaur 70 yrs old kid?
Tupak Ray I know that was a joke but you guys always underestimate kids. Yes, some kids still like reading. Yes, some kids go play outside. And yes, some kids like oldie stuff like movies, fashion, etc.
Tupak Ray the original movie made in the 70s.
would you like a cookie
I read the book too, when I was a middle schooler
Obviously you don't have actual OCD. :p re-stepping on shite in the street is minor compared to those who have it really bad. Crippling OCD can have people go through hours of rituals for pointless worries.
You nailed it!
Mon ‘ami It’s actually a great movie...there is a difference between explaining the movie and making fun of it.
the books are incroyable. Agatha Christie is the world’s best selling author, n’est-ce pas? Selling over 2 billion copies. This is only one of her stories. I don’t see you selling that many books :)
Affaire classée!
Let Me Explain the least you could have done is read the wiki page for the book and look at Agatha Christie's Poirot which was around for over 20 years. David Suchet is the best Poirot to date and perhaps forever. Yes. Poirot is the greatest detective in the world.
I agree very much!!
That mustache is amazing!!!!!!
Rajat Basak oh ya
This version was an absolute butchery of the story. Hercule did not just choose to let them go easy like, he let them go because the murder on the Orient Express was the first case that challenged him on an existential level pitting his religious faith against the concept of justice that he held with extremely high regard. Hercule also is not supposed to be a narcissist, he would never call himself "the world's greatest detective". This modern remake completely removed ALL the nuance from the character and story completely reducing it down to a Hollywood "Find the bad guy, but wait what a twist" cash grab.
I agree with you. This hercule poirot is quite different with the book version. I personally love the book version and the David Suchet version. But anyway, Hercule Poirot is indeed a narcissist and have been known to called himself the greatest detective in the world.
Right, and with the help of your comment, the final book of Poirot makes even more sense now..
I wont spoil it for y'all.. and yes, I said book, although David Suchet reprieved his role in the TV adaptation
Bravo 👏🏼
The reason the detective placed his other foot on the poop and his intence habit of 'balancing' things actually has a very deep meaning. Its justice yall~
Poirot of the books would definitely have cleaned his shoe immediately. No chance he would have stepped in poop a second time. He was obsessive about being clean, brushing his clothes etc
Lol that was funny when he said the Esteban 's long name
Sara Williams but he forgot the Montoya
It’s not even him. I looked it up on IMDb.
Right lol. He Reminds me of the Latina news reporter on the show Married with Children when he said it lol
The moustache was actually something extremely accurate to the book. It was the first description of his, actually. So actually this movie might be more accurate
It was inaccurate with much of the content from the book.
@@columkenn true, but I spek only for moustache 🥸
I’m a huge fan of the original film and I adore Agatha Christie’s novels and plays, but I was so afraid of modern directors going a bit too crazy in this film. I guess I was right in some areas.
Dude are you Ezra Miller?
You freakin sound like him 🤨
It's a bloody good film. The production quality alone is amazing. Watch it. You'll love it.
Albert Finney played Poirot in the 74 film, not the other actor you kept showing.
Dave Starsign 2010 TV movie
I originally didn't know this was coming out at the time but I still caught it and I was impressed with this movie. I enjoyed Daisy Ridley in this one honestly and she was the reason I went to see it🤣🤣
Same 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣💀💀
This movie was really good in my opinion. It showed how many people can be affected by one death. I would highly suggest it, but unfortunately you already know the ending .
*"The Greatest Detective In The World"*
I actually like quite a few shots in this movie, including but not limited to the long shot in the beginning, and not limited to the long shots. I think what I commemorate the most is the different approach it took, given the fact that other adaptions have been made before, such as the long shots of all the characters, the bird's eye view that explains the structure of the train rooms, etc. And there was a "The Last Supper" shot right before Kenneth Branagh confronted the killers, which was a bit cliche but still quite grand and memorable against the tunnel and the snowstorm, especailly on big screen.
“My fellow solders would tell I’m a terrible shot” , kills Hamilton 3 seconds later, nearly kills Hercule... yeah I totaly believe in that Burr. totaly.
Well they weren’t expecting the greatest detective in the world to be on the train. Hercules got on the train at the last second plus he has to TELL everybody he’s a detective after the murder. Implying they didn’t know and it was just very bad luck.
The Poirot in the original novel has a big moustache so...
Could you please add a warning for the flashing in this video for people with photosensitivity please? Thank you in advance!
I watched the original movie a couple years ago and honestly don’t remember a thing about it aside from who the murderer was. Kinda wish I’d forgotten that part so I could watch like the first time again here because I thought the stylistic decisions, cinematography, and cast made this a much more interesting film.
2:56 that depends who's asking?
Oh well sure sir
I'm Alexander Hamilton
I'm at your service sir
I have been looking for you
0:05 WRONG SIR
Irony:
*Knows Aaron Burr...
*Doesn't know David Suchet..
Hi, just finished Death on Nile. Mask in coupe is explained
There were 13 suspects in the book. One of them, a duchess or something like that, who was the younger sister of the kidnapped girl, did not stab casseti
but she was guilty as she hid the knife in her dress thinking she would not be searched
That acting was really good !The fuck are you talking about?
Video title: Murder on the Orient Express *(2019)*
*Published on Nov 20, 2017*
Hmmmm...What?
Won’t lie, the costumes were the best part!!!!!
It was really an enjoyable film. I hope they do make the sequel .
“The Orient Express makes United Airlines looks less bad”, funny but highly disagreeable.( Seriously, the actual Orient Express is GORGEOUS)
I actually loved this movie. It was like Clue on a train with famous superhero’s, Star Wars Characters And Disney sidekicks. Oh and a pirate
Not a fan of this video. The film was great though
You will find out in the 2nd movie about his beard
A good twist would’ve been if everyone had done it.
Oh.
Wait
I’m 13 and I’ve read the book and seen the movie
I read the book it’s actually really good
1:30 why does Johnny Depp look like Freddie Mercury
I can’t unsee it now.
This didn't explain anything just recapping the character's. Wtf?? Unsubscribe from this channel immediately..
So I read the book when I was young, Agatha Christy is hands down my favorite author and I did saw the new movie and I liked it for the most part the only thing that bothered me was the casting of Hercule Poariot , this is not what he was described as in the books
This is one of my favorite novels and the 1974 version starring Albert Finney is one of my favorite movies, which is NOT the one you have screenshots of in this video.
I’m 15 and I loved the book and the film
"...ratshit yes his name is ratshit" 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Someone explain the ending to me when he said that they found a body in egypt int the nill lake please
The Nile is a river, not a lake. It is a reference to "Death on the Nile", another Poirot book. 4 years after the 1974 "Orient Express" movie, a film version was released, with Peter Ustinov as Poirot. It is obvious sequel bait and Brannagh has just filmed it for release this year (4 years after his "Orient Express")
I think that the amazon series is a lot better than this movie. David Suchet (or idk how to spell his name) portrays Poirot so well, and this one is sorta weird. It’s a good story, but ya know. I recommend the Amazon Prime series !!!!
Oh yeah the famous Hercule Poirot chasing and beating people, threatening the suspects and the police with a pistol. All those aspects of the character that he is known for.
I don’t know if you guys know this but Hercules is supposed be a narcissist
I hated the movie, the end and the interpretation of the detective
His moustache was explained in Death on the Nile
I was going to say
"The greatest detective in the world" kills me everytime lmao
I think the first 30 mins of the original movie explained the kidnapping of the Armstrong kid. That made the revelation cooler towards the end. But of course, this movie came at a different generation that did not grow up with those books so they had to use the opening scene to show how cool Hercule really was.
Actually that was the great David Suchet which is filmed in the 90s started in 1989 please do your research
(BACKROUND MUSIC) Victory!
For Ml players.
The end teaser for "Death On The Nile" was bogus. The murders happen when Poirot was in Egypt on the riverboat, not before, as the ending of "Murder On The Orient Express" implies.
When I watched this movie, I figured it out really fast without reading the book or watching the original. Twelve stab wounds, twelve suspects, when he’s reading the letters if you look closely one of them says “you can’t escape US”. A good movie tho.
this movie is sooo bad
oh I am offended by you sir!!! I love seventies movies and even this because movies this days are just about sex for comedy...
Burr: becomes Amstrong’s right hand man bc Washington is already taken
The original was hic glamor, old Hollywood class & style as was the original Death on the Nile you can clearly see the same matched set of Louis Vuitton steamer trunks in both movies and the also make a appearance in evil under the sun
0:52 - Poirot from the 70s? That's taken from a UK TV show that didn't start until 1989. It would be really nice if TH-camrs researched their content before posting it.
LOL I’m crying they chose JOHNNY DEPP to be Cassetti/Ratchett?? When Poirot literally turns down helping him in the books by saying “Forgive me, but I do not like your face.” Now who in their right mind would not like Johnny Depp’s face 😮 I’m sorry Depp but you do not have the look to be Ratchett
Edit: I love Michelle Pfeiffer so much but making her Mrs. Hubbard only works if she is OBNOXIOUSLY American
Why does the title say (2019)? This movie (and video) came out in (2017)
1) Imagine Dragons is great.
2) Branagh did a fantastic job at both directing and acting in this film.
The accents are. Worst
Johnny has played 4 Edwards in 4movies Edward scissorhands in Edward scissorhands Edward David wood Jr in Ed wood Jackson Edward teague aka Jack sparrow in pirates of the Caribbean and Edward ratchet in murder on the Orient express
Once again Kenneth Branagh plays that greatest of all characters, the center of his own universe, nudge nudge, wink wink - Gilderoy Lockhart.
I started watching this video then I was like let me go watch the movie, while I did I thought oh he's definitely making that Esteban joke, but then the my uncle joke got me. Good one!
0:51 Actor David Suchet did not play Hercule Poirot in the 'seventies but much more recently - from 1989 to 2013. In the 'seventies the role was most famously played by Peter Ustinov. Do your research FFS!
Oh my god the person (narrator) is the most irritating..... ( cartoonishly) ....if I may say so.... please read the book before putting out a video.
I honestly did not care for Kenneth Branagh as Poirot. David Suchet is the best. He really did his homework for the role and was Poirot for 25 years. He literally did every short story and novel by Agatha Cristie.
This movie... disappointing
Great cast, huge set up..... the resolution... lame. Waste of time.
For real... I hate the mustache. Every single BAD adaptation of the character does the ridiculous cartoonishly big mustache cliche
What's the band? I thought the movie had era appropriate music. I remember a Duke Ellington piece just cause I'm a jazz guy, but what band are you speaking of out of curiosity?
Dude David Suchet didn't do Murder on the Orient Express in the 70s. That was Albert Finney. Suchet's version is from 2010.
Uhh he said probably
Your channel is called 'let me explain' so it makes sense why it says your name in the title
What doesn't make sense is how you think was a good enough spoiler warning
I assumed that this was going to be a review or talk about something interesting
Instead all you done was recount the entire plot but threw the twist at the start rather than at the end, and make fun of a weird guy having a weird moustache....
I'm just glad Johnny Depp got whacked early on so I could watch most of the movie without him and also because Johnny Depp got fake murdered.
It's called OCD. This is expanded on in the book series
I saw this instead of watching Thor Ragnarok a third time ABC's regretted it. I feel sleep twice. In the movies defense, it was a late show, I was on vacation at Disneyland after a long day of Disneying. Still zzzzzzzz Just saying.
I grew up watching Death on the Nile and Evil Under the Sun so I was a little disappointed
It took me four days to watch every video on this channel and I’m hungry for more
Branaghs ego went all the way North in this ridiculous version, I dont like even mentioning the classic 74 film in the same sentence. I prefer to call it another version, than a remake of that superb and superior movie. The scene where they all kill him in a frenzy (with Derek Jacobi hamming it up) can only be described as Cinemas all time high dogs breakfast