Wow. I've seen some great videos on argument mapping; and read some interesting accounts in articles. But, in under ten minutes, Dr Fitzgerald makes so clear what it's all about and gives you that 'penny has dropped' moment. I just can't stop watching these videos now! Thank you for posting.
2 and 3 are independent from each other, but they are both joint progresses with premise 1. It's also worth noting that none of these arguments are deductively valid. They are all missing major premises.
@@joelopez3552 What is wrong with political examples? They were all supported by objective premises e.g. "Gay marriage is unconstitutional" and "American leaders should not encourage the behaviour of dictators" - are you saying these are not factually objective premises?
every video I try to find on youtube for my critical thinking class is politically biased and its getting really annoying. A whole unit of this class is all about looking for bias from media, sources etc and most the ones linked by the professor are like this. This one I found on my own, but I just want to be able to be taught the concepts without an example taking a jab at trump or bush or something. It;s just unprofessional.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 89 | คู่เอก "ยอดไอคิว vs คิริลล์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z3vYkHJ_5Ig/mqdefault.jpg)
Wow. I've seen some great videos on argument mapping; and read some interesting accounts in articles. But, in under ten minutes, Dr Fitzgerald makes so clear what it's all about and gives you that 'penny has dropped' moment. I just can't stop watching these videos now! Thank you for posting.
In a logic and critical thinking class, and I was so confused. This has been the most helpful explanation so far.
Anyone here from Stellies 114?
8:31 What do we do if (1) is an opinion like in your example? The premise isn’t very solid…
This was thorough and concise. Thank you
That was great Dr. Fitzgerald, new subscriber. I have to listen to it again.
Those are some great arguments that you picked! Very helpful video.
Your content is so touching
very helpful, Thank you sir
Very good and funny videos bring a great sense of entertainment!
Wow
Thats awesome❤️❤️❤️❤️
Great explanation!
1.25 speed ftw
Why wouldn’t the last 3 be independent?
2 and 3 are independent from each other, but they are both joint progresses with premise 1.
It's also worth noting that none of these arguments are deductively valid. They are all missing major premises.
「コンテンツを調整する必要があります」、
this was gooood thank uu
2024 : I’m writing tomorrow
you need to clarify the content
Any one from bs 3rd 😅
what the hell were these examples. No narrative here
You have to take critical thinking to understand.
@@jessicabonner5382 My comment was to point out the oddly political examples that were used.
Trump loves dictators ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@@joelopez3552 What is wrong with political examples? They were all supported by objective premises e.g. "Gay marriage is unconstitutional" and "American leaders should not encourage the behaviour of dictators" - are you saying these are not factually objective premises?
@@blueowl718 no they are just oddly political and threw me off. My professors examples weren’t tied to politics or what he believed Trump was doing.
Have to give Mr. Fitsgerald the ol Ad Block for the Left-leaning foolishness.
every video I try to find on youtube for my critical thinking class is politically biased and its getting really annoying. A whole unit of this class is all about looking for bias from media, sources etc and most the ones linked by the professor are like this. This one I found on my own, but I just want to be able to be taught the concepts without an example taking a jab at trump or bush or something. It;s just unprofessional.