you prolly dont give a shit but does anyone know of a tool to log back into an Instagram account..? I was dumb forgot the password. I would appreciate any tips you can offer me!
@Neil Bruno Thanks for your reply. I got to the site through google and im in the hacking process atm. Takes quite some time so I will reply here later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
I'll one-up the commenters saying this explained Mill's Methods more effectively than a full-on lecture. This video explained Mill's Methods better than the youtube video my instructor provided that is literally a computer-generated audio of a Wiki article. It is deplorable that a university degree is now the lowest common denominator and that I have to waste my precious time and money on an "education" like that just so I can daydream about buying a house someday.
It seems to me that Mill's first approach, the method of agreement, is not satisfactory if taken as explained in this video. For is there not the possibility that *all* the food in the restaurant has caused illness? I think this option can only be excluded if someone did not eat the seafood and if someone else only ate the seafood. The hidden assumption in this video then, is that only one dish has caused illness... Update: this is covered by the caveats at the end of the video. Would've loved to have seen them pointed out at the beginning, or used as an thinking exercise.
I'm afraid your explanation of the joint method isn't quite accurate. Looking at Ellen, Jack, and Allison establishes that eating beef might be sufficient to be sick (the method of agreement), but it shows a similar possibility for eating seafood. To narrow it down to the beef, you need to employ the method of difference, which happens if you compare the cases of Jack and "You," since these are the only two that differ with respect to the independent variable and are similar with respect to all the possible causes. Simply noting that "You" didn't eat beef and didn't get sick doesn't quite illustrate the application of difference. Also, while your explanation of residues is explanatory, it's not exactly an example of a causal relationship.
great video, you explained what my professor failed to explain in 2 hours in just 5 minutes
you prolly dont give a shit but does anyone know of a tool to log back into an Instagram account..?
I was dumb forgot the password. I would appreciate any tips you can offer me!
@Otto Bentley Instablaster =)
@Neil Bruno Thanks for your reply. I got to the site through google and im in the hacking process atm.
Takes quite some time so I will reply here later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
@Neil Bruno It worked and I now got access to my account again. I'm so happy:D
Thanks so much, you really help me out :D
@Otto Bentley glad I could help xD
I understood immediately. Thank you for your efforts!
Thank you so much for the video! So much better than my 1.5 hour lecture...
I'll one-up the commenters saying this explained Mill's Methods more effectively than a full-on lecture. This video explained Mill's Methods better than the youtube video my instructor provided that is literally a computer-generated audio of a Wiki article. It is deplorable that a university degree is now the lowest common denominator and that I have to waste my precious time and money on an "education" like that just so I can daydream about buying a house someday.
thanks for the video , very helpfull
Crisp and clear. Thanks a lot !
Thank you so much! Very Well explained
Love your video. Thank you so much
helped me understand the subject better, thanks a lot!
Thank u sir..it is very really useful for BEd students..
It seems to me that Mill's first approach, the method of agreement, is not satisfactory if taken as explained in this video. For is there not the possibility that *all* the food in the restaurant has caused illness? I think this option can only be excluded if someone did not eat the seafood and if someone else only ate the seafood. The hidden assumption in this video then, is that only one dish has caused illness...
Update: this is covered by the caveats at the end of the video. Would've loved to have seen them pointed out at the beginning, or used as an thinking exercise.
it was very helpful, thanks :)
Well-explained. Thank you.
Very well explained!!!
realllly good video...thanx a lot
How amazinggg!!!!
SO HELPFUL.
This was very helpful. Thanks Sir.
hey thanks for this.
Awesome explanation
Super informative 👍💯💯💯
Very helpful W you L mill + ratio
thanks a bundle sir :)
sir ap na kyun falsafa chora :-P .. Its kazmi here
very useful video
Thank you to save me 😭😭😭😭
You are awesome
Is it just me or does this guy look like that picture of John Mill?
Thank you sir
just sounds like Aristotle's posterior analytics so far
Which course is this ?????
in other words, "how to pass any multiple choice question without knowing the answer."
Thanks for making it easy 😂
I'm afraid your explanation of the joint method isn't quite accurate. Looking at Ellen, Jack, and Allison establishes that eating beef might be sufficient to be sick (the method of agreement), but it shows a similar possibility for eating seafood. To narrow it down to the beef, you need to employ the method of difference, which happens if you compare the cases of Jack and "You," since these are the only two that differ with respect to the independent variable and are similar with respect to all the possible causes. Simply noting that "You" didn't eat beef and didn't get sick doesn't quite illustrate the application of difference.
Also, while your explanation of residues is explanatory, it's not exactly an example of a causal relationship.
best
Your explanation to their approach of mill's joint method is insufficient for me to understand it
Thank you sir