You want to know the trick to getting this wo work... Resonance, like toughs ultrasonic cleaners. It makes the bubbles compress as they are burnt. It's how you get the pressure you need. To stabilise it you use a set of secondary frequencies to sweep the edges near the terminals.
This experiment definately employs what we already know about separating hydrogen from water. The fact that the hydrogen burns and creates water vapor can explain the rising temperatures. This doesn't necessarily express fusion unless Helium or deuterium is being produced.
Cold fusion involves a palladium cathode and 4 platinum coils acting as diodes. This appears to be high voltage electrolysis which will give you Hydrogen and Oxygen. Cold fusion also uses heavy water or deuterium in a lithium solution which is fused into Helium 4 creating the excess heat that it is famous for. The only other way known to fuse deuterium into Helium 4 is by standard fusion. Look up the Ivy Mike nuclear test for a clear example.
You can always.. just copy what fusion does Ignite uranium.. then ignite hydrogen.. then ignite helium.. Potentially igniting all air in earth at once.. Dont do it
Always makes me smile when I see someone creating an underwater arc and calling it cold fusion, lol! What exactly do you think is fusing here... and what new element do you suggest is being created? I think you need to reread a few science books!
"Before and after" is the name of the picture I dedicated to your very good invention and great research about the cold fusion. Have a very good one. Best greetings to you from France. Natmara
Could I use this set up in replacement of hydrogen electrolysis in a automotive engine, or maybe even diesel? I’ve been trying to find a way to produce a reliable, and maybe even more powerful way to use hydrogen in replacement of gas and/or additional to it.
Sorry to say, this is not cold fusion. You have come quite close. But would need to try harder and would need to procure some rare material.. Like heavy water and a palladium electrode. So I would say, don't give up. Try harder..
I did enjoy the video though I wish you had explained what our goal was in detail. You did a great job with what you did though but pls. consider us that know nothing of this process the next time you make a video and I am looking forward to another. I always thought cold fusion was the stacking up of certain molocules in a cold envirement untill the molecules reach a point of reaction not useing heat at all. But thats just me I guess. Thanks. ApostleRon ( I know my spelling is bad)
This looks cool, but this is not the design of the "cold fusion" reactor. The "cold fusion" reactor is a battery that uses palladium electrodes to compress deuterium ions into the metal. Call it an underwater arc reactor. Also if you arn't detecting neutrons, there is no fusion! Buy a neutron detector!
over 50 experiments conducted by SRI International showed excess power well above the accuracy of measurement. Arata and Zhang said they observed excess heat power averaging 80 watts (1.8 times input energy) over 12 days. The researchers also said that the amount of energy reported in some of the experiments appeared to be too great compared to the small mass of the material in the cell for it to be stored by any chemical process
John Keely machine shop work during late 1800's was able to control some forces of nature with resonance vibrations. He used arrays of tuning forks hooked to what we now call thermocouples and thermopiles of silver, gold and platinum wires. Inharmonics of certain RATIOS applied would cause molecular and atomic attraction. He could even cause same poles of magnets to attract. several books available. Keely And His Discoveries, + Free Energy Pioneer + The Snell Manuscript - which is a tech summary of Keely's 3 reports printed about 1892.
It was just a normal comment. He can't proof its real cold fusion. Looks to me like browns gas...guess if there would be the He you described, it would as bright as the sun. ;-)
This video is great when it comes to separating Oxygen and Hydrogen and then putting it back together. But for Fusion to accrue, You have to end up with a denser Element that is greater than all that is exposed in the experiment. He makes no attempt at searching for this element and I find the text misleading.
Good. Now you see how cold fusion works Bernoulli Effect - Science Theater 17 Those two cans get closer when air flows between them simulates how two protons are joined together. So then we have a helium-atom with cold fusion.
A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves
It only took listening to the description to know this is not Cold Fusion, and far from it. They use Lithium as the electrolyte, and heavy water, not distilled water, and the cathode is either Palladium, or some have had success with Nickel. Just burning Hydrogen, is not Cold Fusion, and nowhere near it. The excess heat, generated by Cold Fusion, is from the reaction within the cathode itself, where the process forms Helium, and some have found Tritium. In this, it is fusion, they think, that creates these new elements. Folks, go to a reputable website, or video to learn what it is, there are several good university lectures on it. This is nothing more than an electric arc electrolysis.
this is just high energy electrolysis... How would one claim that this is fusion? you would need a concentration of deuterium or tritium for starters...
The description for this video reads like a highschooler tossed a bunch of random tech jargon together. Like if I made a video of a car motor and called it a "diesel hydro dynamic compressed combustion gas low emission pulse driven power plant" Sounds cool. Doest mean shit. Im pretty sure thats just plasma electrolysis. Or just a high voltage arc inside a fancy jar.
I did That Variac can be directly connected to a bridge diodes and capacitor assembly to produce dc just use a circuit breaker 20 amps will do fine. You can buy it At your local electronic stores and spare parts
M8 All you've built is a small bomb. the device itself is just high voltage electrolysis which is creating oxygen and hydrogen, This oxygen/hydrogen mixture is then being compressed in the tube essentially forming a bomb that would off with an open source of ignition. Also that steam isn't steam, its the oxygen and hydrogen forming back into water.
Hello i have some questions i hope you answer me What kind of rods ? and how many it thickness ? are you give AC or DC electric? Is the rods rust or nothing happen to rods
Chrispcrunchy is right The only way to confirm fusion is to ensure the presence of helium. However both helium and hydrogen are lighter then air and the presence of hydrogen means its not fusion. To confirm fusion light the bag on fire. Hydrogen is combustible and helium is not so if the bag ignites fusion is not occurring. The only problem with this idea is if hydrogen is present burning the bag is dangerous. The solution is to inhale the contents then talk to see if your voice goes squeaky
YOUR THE ONE WHO DEFINE THE RULES OF THE UNIVERSE REMEMBER MANY THEORIES ABOUT THE UNIVERSE WAS ACCEPTED BY PHYSICS BEFORE AND THEN WAS DISCOVERED WRONG
This is water vapor bubbles created by the electrical heat (arc) that then implode. The sound you can hear is called cavitation - not fusion... The exact same thing happens when you weld under water, and it is all just an electrical water heater.
This is the Pons and Fleischman setup. Without palladium... i believe 1982 It is actually not cold fusion. The reaction that takes place however is very efficient and can be used as heating. As you push current trough the rod into the water, the rod heats up. At a DC voltage of about 250 to 300 volts DC you get a real good reaction. What happens??? As the Rod is heated by the initial current flowing through it, the contact point with the water turns the water into steam. The water is conductive, but the steam is not. This is the essential and vital point to remember. Because the tip of the rod is now covered in steam and not water, there is no electrical conduction between the rod and the water. Just like when you close a light switch, you can see the sparc. Especially with DC this sparc is prevalent. So the voltage wants to jump the gap between the rod, the steam and the water. Because there is a high voltage, the sparc can jump this gap. However, because the steam is virtually non conductive the current drawn, drops significantly. The sparc however is very very hot as it is actually plasma, which is about 3000 degree celcius. Hot enough to melt metal, as you can see happening in a welding device. This ensures the rod stays hot enough, to keep the water touching the rod, instantly boiling and thus creating the insulating steam barrier. So with this setup you can easily create tremendous temperatures that heat up the water, creating steam while drawing far less current then a normal water heater does.If you were to raise the voltage to say, 500 volt DC the reaction would be far more efficient still. The water wouldn't have to be so conductive and the initial current draw would be much lower. Hence an even more efficient system. Instead of using sodium hydroxide or any kind of hydroxide, the non poisonous sodium bi carbonate will do the trick to. Stay safe and pass on the knowledge, by courtesy of EmC4U2 (youtuber)
@vartatoosh I stand by that the definition of Cold Fusion I used is the scientifically correct (but incredible simplified) one. What you said "10 watts in, 11 watts out" is called 'Over Unity'(Zero field energy, perpetual energy, etc). Over Unity does not concern itself with keeping the temperature low, although temperature still must be acounted for, as should all types of energy when trying to prove one has broken the law of conservation of energy.
@DerCrossi You are right, my statement about the process emiting no radiation is wrong. The thing is that radioactive waste from nuclear fusion remains radioactive for 50 to 70 years compared to the thousands of years radioactivity of nuclear fission residue. I would edit my post and correct it but there is no option for editing :)
I'm not getting it's use. Using electrolysis to separate hydrogen and oxygen, then igniting it with a plasma arc. Producing steam. But... What's it's use?
Humor me, but exactly what is "the reaction"? I saw current arcing underwater, but beyond that there didn't appear to be anything special happening. What evidence was present that fusion was occurring?
Has there been a controlled experiment to validate that this setup is producing different results than just sticking a couple of metal rods into distilled water and cranking up the wattage?
And Those who Blaspheme and says that Our Lord Didnt walk over water shall be condemned into the Forest with nothing. Amen Borther , Lord has spoken to you today. 😇
Hey you can get peladium out of a catilitic converter, then you can replicate thing's even better, just run your lead to the peladium dipped end of the converter material, then use that for your spark gap. I'm pretty sure that will work.
Cool kettle but its not cold fusion. I've built similar things & to make it work you need A/C. If you use A/C you find the temperature tries to climb to 10000 degrees resulting in ruined test gear, but a successful experiment. As is, your arc is separating the hydrogen from the oxygen then igniting them but without net gain in energy released. I don't know why A/C works so well and D/C just separate but you find it does, so try it.
En mi humilde opinión , se genera hidrógeno pero este hace ignición , debido a los atomos de oxigeno y esto calienta el agua , con lo cual lo que sale por encima es vapor de agua , el agua no alcanzara mas de 100ºc, pero lo que se esta obteniendo es vapor agua junto con alguna molecula de oh , pero este método no me parece que sirva , y no es fusion en frio. Saludos!!
At first I couldnt see the point but now I get the idea. It uses both the electric current and the energy traped as hydrogen and oxygen to heat the water. How does this compare with total power used heating with a conventional electric element? Can you replicate this without boosting the hydrogen level in the water by adding the drain cleaner? Heating water using electric current is so inefficient anyway I wonder where you could use this.
Cold fusion Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies don´t presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the principles of the universe. As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms.
Pretty fancy under water welder. Cool looking, but not fusion. You need to try to focus a dueterium gas stream with a focused tritium gas stream and add say 100 million electron volts. Then you'd be cooking with fusion. Good luck Mr. Wizard.
Surely this is nothing but plasma and electrolysis, and potentially igniting the mixture of oxygen, and hydrogen, if they manage to mix. Fire, being a plasma, would also provide a low resistance path for the electricity, in addition to the plasma arcs formed by the voltage. And every time the current jumps, is because of a plasma discharge. If he actually reliably ignited all the hydrogen produced here, then all the losses and effects are 100% heat, so he'd have a heater that's 100% efficient, much like an electrical radiator. I'd prefer the radiator though, because it's less noisy, and less likely to kill anyone.
Drain off the water keeping the the bag opening at the bottom so none of the lighter than air gasses can escape. See if the bag floats (Is lighter than air.) then try and burn the contents of bag to confirm it is not hydrogen (also lighter than air.)
while I undertsnad what your intentions are. Cold fusion tests require a number of things to vrify that cold fusion is taking place. Have you confirmed the fusion of atoms, creation of elements on the anode, reliably measured input watts against output watts. It is possible to make plasma arcs in air and warm the air up. But that does not conclusivly prove cold fusion. I hope you undertand where I am comming from. Thanks.
Sorry man, don't know if this was for me or not but what i was asking was if he found traces of helium4 which would be an indication of a nuclear reaction i.e coldfusion. If not and there is no excess heat all that's happening here is electrolysis resulting in HHO gas which in turn would only be beneficial if it were to produce more energy than it took to extract the Hydrogen. get me?
@JenMichel100 I never said it couldn't be a candidate solution to the upcoming energy crisis. One could compare this experiment with igniting TNT, one does not have to use much energy to ignite TNT, and one gets a hell of a lot more energy out of it. But no chemist would dare to call either Electrolysis nor igniting TNT "over unity", cause making TNT requires energy and so does making H2O. The difference between TNT and H2O is that H2O is a natural resource which we have plenty of.
Two questions: 1. What is the Imput/output energy-wise? Excess heat? you don't seem to answer either leading me to believe that it's just a simple electrolis experiment. 2. Why haven't you tested for the presence of the nuclear ash helium4? isn't that the telltale sign of a nuclear reaction?
Thats what happens in hot fusion. 2 Hydrogen are forced to fuse and break the Coulomb barrier. In LENR, low energy Nuclear Reactions, The Hydrogen gains Neutrons, up to 4, once it hits 4 neutrons, it "decays" into Helium, i guess. And the "decay" part is Beta-decay
@FatLingon Silly person, I never said it was cold fusion, I just found it funny that you called it the mysterious white powder, that's all. After all, cold fusion is the holy grail of science.
just wondering if you could tell us what your current and voltage in is compared to the current and voltage out. is the 250 volts the power being supplied or the power being produced? ..... heh
This here is hydrogen burning - nothing to do with nuclear fussion.Fusing hydrogen into helium usually happens in the core of a star where the pressure and heat are unimaginable and that's why cold fusion is considered impossible.However if someone actually figures out how to create cold fusion he will instantly become the richest person in the history of the world, for cold fusion is an infinite energy source and(unlike nuclear fission) emits absolutely no radiation which makes it totaly clean.
YA KOOL ,THOUGHT YOU SAID COLD FUSION ,LOOKING AT THE THERMOMETER IT IS WARM ,SO WARM FUSION? NOW IF YOU SHUT OFF THE INPUT JUICE WILL IT CONTINUE TO REACT AND PRODUCE ELECTRICITY @220 VOLTS?
@holywdtughguy So did you think doing "the colony" was worth it? And did they tell you everything you were going to do and where to go throughout the show? I thought it was pretty good.
very nice, i would think it was similar to how a star is born. the RF noise can go way up causing the gas to become conductive. here you hit it with enough volts, and low amps. now think how can a gas be heated up in the same manner as the water was slowly, but with high frequency RF in the 22ooo kHz or even microwave frequency. like on the sun..
Hydrogen cells don't create fusionl, it's just small amounts of hydrogen reacting with oxygen. The reaction gives off quite a bit of energy with only water as a product, which is why NASA uses it for rocket fuel.
If fusion is happening here you should be able to detect helium being generated. When one atom of hydrogen fuses with another atom of hydrogen you will have a lot of energy emitted and helium produced as a byproduct. If there is no helium generated then you would have to say that this is not nuclear fusion.
steam means nothing, coal and natural gas plants heat water and generate steam to run the dynamo. i can make steam with a zippo (lighter), dose that mean zippo uses cold fussion to light cigarettes?? acording to you, every time i make tea, and the pot whistles, that means theres cold fussion occoring in the kettle??
Can you repeat this experiment and test for helium. Seeing as helium is non flamable it would not be comsumed in the combustion of the hydrogen. To test for it you would only have to place a bag made of light plastic over to top of the unit to catch gasses given off. Seal the bag and let the gasses cool so the water vapour can condense.
You want to know the trick to getting this wo work... Resonance, like toughs ultrasonic cleaners. It makes the bubbles compress as they are burnt. It's how you get the pressure you need. To stabilise it you use a set of secondary frequencies to sweep the edges near the terminals.
This experiment definately employs what we already know about separating hydrogen from water. The fact that the hydrogen burns and creates water vapor can explain the rising temperatures. This doesn't necessarily express fusion unless Helium or deuterium is being produced.
Cold fusion involves a palladium cathode and 4 platinum coils acting as diodes. This appears to be high voltage electrolysis which will give you Hydrogen and Oxygen. Cold fusion also uses heavy water or deuterium in a lithium solution which is fused into Helium 4 creating the excess heat that it is famous for. The only other way known to fuse deuterium into Helium 4 is by standard fusion. Look up the Ivy Mike nuclear test for a clear example.
THANK YOU FOR EDUCATING ME.
NOPE
You are now about to witness the strength of street knowledge…
Makes nuke*
Cold fusion doesn't involve anything except nuclear fusion and the quality of being "cold" which isn't well-defined.
You can always.. just copy what fusion does
Ignite uranium.. then ignite hydrogen.. then ignite helium..
Potentially igniting all air in earth at once..
Dont do it
Always makes me smile when I see someone creating an underwater arc and calling it cold fusion, lol! What exactly do you think is fusing here... and what new element do you suggest is being created? I think you need to reread a few science books!
"Before and after" is the name of the picture I dedicated to your very good invention and great research about the cold fusion. Have a very good one. Best greetings to you from France. Natmara
Energy in is exactly the same energy out. This is not fusion, its electrolysis!!
less like electrolysis and more like the most expensive and inefficient kettle ever.
this is plasma electrolysis.
Fuck you
I wouldn't even call it electrolysis because it is AC.
Could I use this set up in replacement of hydrogen electrolysis in a automotive engine, or maybe even diesel? I’ve been trying to find a way to produce a reliable, and maybe even more powerful way to use hydrogen in replacement of gas and/or additional to it.
This is amazing cant wait till cold fusion is out there giving the world free energy.
Sorry to say, this is not cold fusion. You have come quite close.
But would need to try harder and would need to procure some rare material..
Like heavy water and a palladium electrode.
So I would say, don't give up. Try harder..
This cold fusion is very hot. I didn't know that underwater welding is actually cold fusion. Who knew...
I did enjoy the video though I wish you had explained what our goal was in detail. You did a great job with what you did though but pls. consider us that know nothing of this process the next time you make a video and I am looking forward to another. I always thought cold fusion was the stacking up of certain molocules in a cold envirement untill the molecules reach a point of reaction not useing heat at all. But thats just me I guess. Thanks. ApostleRon ( I know my spelling is bad)
This looks cool, but this is not the design of the "cold fusion" reactor. The "cold fusion" reactor is a battery that uses palladium electrodes to compress deuterium ions into the metal.
Call it an underwater arc reactor.
Also if you arn't detecting neutrons, there is no fusion! Buy a neutron detector!
over 50 experiments conducted by SRI International showed excess power well above the accuracy of measurement. Arata and Zhang said they observed excess heat power averaging 80 watts (1.8 times input energy) over 12 days. The researchers also said that the amount of energy reported in some of the experiments appeared to be too great compared to the small mass of the material in the cell for it to be stored by any chemical process
John Keely machine shop work during late 1800's was able to control some forces of nature with resonance vibrations. He used arrays of tuning forks hooked to what we now call thermocouples and thermopiles of silver, gold and platinum wires. Inharmonics of certain RATIOS applied would cause molecular and atomic attraction. He could even cause same poles of magnets to attract. several books available. Keely And His Discoveries, + Free Energy Pioneer + The Snell Manuscript - which is a tech summary of Keely's 3 reports printed about 1892.
This guy in the livingroom with that contraption, a bowl of chips and speed king on full blast. That's how you greet a new year.
It was just a normal comment.
He can't proof its real cold fusion. Looks to me like browns gas...guess if there would be the He you described, it would as bright as the sun. ;-)
Fusion? If you're trying to fuse misinformation and a single digit IQ, mission accomplished
This video is great when it comes to separating Oxygen and Hydrogen and then putting it back together. But for Fusion to accrue, You have to end up with a denser Element that is greater than all that is exposed in the experiment. He makes no attempt at searching for this element and I find the text misleading.
lol, he "fused" oxygen and hydrogen into water.
Current fluctuations caused by bubbles formed at the electrode. Thank you for your demonstration of plasma electrolysis.
So what were the neutron radiation levels?
Very interesting. I didn't know that could be possible.
Came back to this video after 2 years. I love how he stresses the importance of using distilled water, and then proceeds to add potassium hydroxide. 🤣
I think you are own to something here. You have given me some ideas. I realy beleive that you are very close to something here!!!!
okay,nice
keep up the hard work,,to find better,,,solution,,,very low ampere,,with more quantity of hydrogen is best...bravo
glotoniok science
Good. Now you see how cold fusion works
Bernoulli Effect - Science Theater 17
Those two cans get closer when air flows between them simulates how two protons are joined together. So then we have a helium-atom with cold fusion.
A sound (=a certain pressure wave) is conducted to that substance and according to my theory this sound cleans the
energywaves opening up at that that moment from two different hydrogen atomcores with the sound. After that these two cores of hydrogen atom don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand.The other atoms around them continue to expand and push this way these two hydrogen atomcores close to each other with the energywaves that open up from themselves
It only took listening to the description to know this is not Cold Fusion, and far from it. They use Lithium as the electrolyte, and heavy water, not distilled water, and the cathode is either Palladium, or some have had success with Nickel. Just burning Hydrogen, is not Cold Fusion, and nowhere near it. The excess heat, generated by Cold Fusion, is from the reaction within the cathode itself, where the process forms Helium, and some have found Tritium. In this, it is fusion, they think, that creates these new elements. Folks, go to a reputable website, or video to learn what it is, there are several good university lectures on it. This is nothing more than an electric arc electrolysis.
craxd1 yes youre right
Michael Raines surviving the radiation of fusion is far more scientifically interesting than cold fusion.
Yea didn't think of that until my thermometer went out!!!
yes!!!!!!!!! I 100% AGREE WITH YOU, what is the imput watts, and energy produced, and can we harness the energy produced!
this is just high energy electrolysis... How would one claim that this is fusion? you would need a concentration of deuterium or tritium for starters...
The description for this video reads like a highschooler tossed a bunch of random tech jargon together. Like if I made a video of a car motor and called it a "diesel hydro dynamic compressed combustion gas low emission pulse driven power plant"
Sounds cool. Doest mean shit. Im pretty sure thats just plasma electrolysis. Or just a high voltage arc inside a fancy jar.
wow that guy should get the Nobel Prize. He's a genius.
this is some high tech boiler machine, right?
I did That Variac can be directly connected to a bridge diodes and capacitor assembly to produce dc just use a circuit breaker 20 amps will do fine. You can buy it At your local electronic stores and spare parts
M8 All you've built is a small bomb. the device itself is just high voltage electrolysis which is creating oxygen and hydrogen, This oxygen/hydrogen mixture is then being compressed in the tube essentially forming a bomb that would off with an open source of ignition. Also that steam isn't steam, its the oxygen and hydrogen forming back into water.
eels are the perfect form of cold fusion
Hello
i have some questions i hope you answer me
What kind of rods ?
and how many it thickness ?
are you give AC or DC electric?
Is the rods rust or nothing happen to rods
Chrispcrunchy is right
The only way to confirm fusion is to ensure the presence of helium. However both helium and hydrogen are lighter then air and the presence of hydrogen means its not fusion. To confirm fusion light the bag on fire. Hydrogen is combustible and helium is not so if the bag ignites fusion is not occurring. The only problem with this idea is if hydrogen is present burning the bag is dangerous. The solution is to inhale the contents then talk to see if your voice goes squeaky
YOUR THE ONE WHO DEFINE THE RULES OF THE UNIVERSE
REMEMBER MANY THEORIES ABOUT THE UNIVERSE WAS ACCEPTED BY PHYSICS BEFORE AND THEN WAS DISCOVERED WRONG
It's the dude from the Colony!
This is water vapor bubbles created by the electrical heat (arc) that then implode. The sound you can hear is called cavitation - not fusion...
The exact same thing happens when you weld under water, and it is all just an electrical water heater.
Are you using AC current???? Thanks
Oh man! You looked a bit less smart on "The Colony"! I could never think up something like that LOL... Nice job there
How energy was put in, and how much came out?
This is the Pons and Fleischman setup. Without palladium... i believe 1982
It is actually not cold fusion. The reaction that takes place however is very efficient and can be used as heating.
As you push current trough the rod into the water, the rod heats up.
At a DC voltage of about 250 to 300 volts DC you get a real good reaction.
What happens???
As the Rod is heated by the initial current flowing through it, the contact point with the water turns the water into steam.
The water is conductive, but the steam is not. This is the essential and vital point to remember.
Because the tip of the rod is now covered in steam and not water, there is no electrical conduction between the rod and the water.
Just like when you close a light switch, you can see the sparc. Especially with DC this sparc is prevalent.
So the voltage wants to jump the gap between the rod, the steam and the water. Because there is a high voltage, the sparc can jump this gap.
However, because the steam is virtually non conductive the current drawn, drops significantly.
The sparc however is very very hot as it is actually plasma, which is about 3000 degree celcius. Hot enough to melt metal, as you can see happening in a welding device. This ensures the rod stays hot enough, to keep the water touching the rod, instantly boiling and thus creating the insulating steam barrier.
So with this setup you can easily create tremendous temperatures that heat up the water, creating steam while drawing far less current then a normal water heater does.If you were to raise the voltage to say, 500 volt DC the reaction would be far more efficient still. The water wouldn't have to be so conductive and the initial current draw would be much lower. Hence an even more efficient system. Instead of using sodium hydroxide or any kind of hydroxide, the non poisonous sodium bi carbonate will do the trick to.
Stay safe and pass on the knowledge, by courtesy of EmC4U2 (youtuber)
@vartatoosh I stand by that the definition of Cold Fusion I used is the scientifically correct (but incredible simplified) one. What you said "10 watts in, 11 watts out" is called 'Over Unity'(Zero field energy, perpetual energy, etc). Over Unity does not concern itself with keeping the temperature low, although temperature still must be acounted for, as should all types of energy when trying to prove one has broken the law of conservation of energy.
@DerCrossi You are right, my statement about the process emiting no radiation is wrong. The thing is that radioactive waste from nuclear fusion remains radioactive for 50 to 70 years compared to the thousands of years radioactivity of nuclear fission residue. I would edit my post and correct it but there is no option for editing :)
hey you are on the show the colony ur great
I don´t know what happen with this video, the sound is just off. Michael maybe you can fix it, thank you. I hope hear it very soon!...
@FatLingon The mysterious 'white powder' is Potassium Hydroxide.
I'm not getting it's use. Using electrolysis to separate hydrogen and oxygen, then igniting it with a plasma arc. Producing steam. But... What's it's use?
Humor me, but exactly what is "the reaction"? I saw current arcing underwater, but beyond that there didn't appear to be anything special happening. What evidence was present that fusion was occurring?
Has there been a controlled experiment to validate that this setup is producing different results than just sticking a couple of metal rods into distilled water and cranking up the wattage?
Hahaha the funniest part is that he probably actually believes that fusion is taking place
And Those who Blaspheme and says that Our Lord Didnt walk over water shall be condemned into the Forest with nothing. Amen Borther , Lord has spoken to you today. 😇
whole point of cold fusion is that it purdices high as hell tempature crazy energy and is 100% clean.
Hey you can get peladium out of a catilitic converter, then you can replicate thing's even better, just run your lead to the peladium dipped end of the converter material, then use that for your spark gap. I'm pretty sure that will work.
Cool kettle but its not cold fusion. I've built similar things & to make it work you need A/C. If you use A/C you find the temperature tries to climb to 10000 degrees resulting in ruined test gear, but a successful experiment. As is, your arc is separating the hydrogen from the oxygen then igniting them but without net gain in energy released. I don't know why A/C works so well and D/C just separate but you find it does, so try it.
That is amazing the way arcing electric currents under water is going to save us.......But, from what? How?
En mi humilde opinión , se genera hidrógeno pero este hace ignición , debido a los atomos de oxigeno y esto calienta el agua , con lo cual lo que sale por encima es vapor de agua , el agua no alcanzara mas de 100ºc, pero lo que se esta obteniendo es vapor agua junto con alguna molecula de oh , pero este método no me parece que sirva , y no es fusion en frio. Saludos!!
At first I couldnt see the point but now I get the idea. It uses both the electric current and the energy traped as hydrogen and oxygen to heat the water. How does this compare with total power used heating with a conventional electric element? Can you replicate this without boosting the hydrogen level in the water by adding the drain cleaner? Heating water using electric current is so inefficient anyway I wonder where you could use this.
This dude was on 'The Colony'. Thought he looked familiar.
Cold fusion
Apparently nowadays most of the people in science societies don´t presume that the so called cold fusion could be possible. According to my theory it however is possible. As a matter of fact it is a relevant part of the
principles of the universe.
As I understand, observations of cold fusion can be observed in a certain substance, that has hydrogen atoms.
Pretty fancy under water welder. Cool looking, but not fusion. You need to try to focus a dueterium gas stream with a focused tritium gas stream and add say 100 million electron volts. Then you'd be cooking with fusion. Good luck Mr. Wizard.
Surely this is nothing but plasma and electrolysis, and potentially igniting the mixture of oxygen, and hydrogen, if they manage to mix. Fire, being a plasma, would also provide a low resistance path for the electricity, in addition to the plasma arcs formed by the voltage. And every time the current jumps, is because of a plasma discharge.
If he actually reliably ignited all the hydrogen produced here, then all the losses and effects are 100% heat, so he'd have a heater that's 100% efficient, much like an electrical radiator. I'd prefer the radiator though, because it's less noisy, and less likely to kill anyone.
Drain off the water keeping the the bag opening at the bottom so none of the lighter than air gasses can escape. See if the bag floats (Is lighter than air.) then try and burn the contents of bag to confirm it is not hydrogen (also lighter than air.)
while I undertsnad what your intentions are. Cold fusion tests require a number of things to vrify that cold fusion is taking place. Have you confirmed the fusion of atoms, creation of elements on the anode, reliably measured input watts against output watts. It is possible to make plasma arcs in air and warm the air up. But that does not conclusivly prove cold fusion. I hope you undertand where I am comming from. Thanks.
So how does this make a blender work? What's the gain of all that show and tell?
was this guy on that show called the colony or something?
Sorry man, don't know if this was for me or not but what i was asking was if he found traces of helium4 which would be an indication of a nuclear reaction i.e coldfusion. If not and there is no excess heat all that's happening here is electrolysis resulting in HHO gas which in turn would only be beneficial if it were to produce more energy than it took to extract the Hydrogen. get me?
@JenMichel100 I never said it couldn't be a candidate solution to the upcoming energy crisis.
One could compare this experiment with igniting TNT, one does not have to use much energy to ignite TNT, and one gets a hell of a lot more energy out of it. But no chemist would dare to call either Electrolysis nor igniting TNT "over unity", cause making TNT requires energy and so does making H2O. The difference between TNT and H2O is that H2O is a natural resource which we have plenty of.
This totally works ive been able to recreate this process on a small scale at home.
Interesting stuff, Can't think of an intelligent comment
today we're saving the world
i dropped my toaster in the bath tub and it cold fused too
hes was on the colony first season gotta watch it
Two questions:
1. What is the Imput/output energy-wise? Excess heat? you don't seem to answer either leading me to believe that it's just a simple electrolis experiment.
2. Why haven't you tested for the presence of the nuclear ash helium4? isn't that the telltale sign of a nuclear reaction?
thats no cold fusion its a good idear but cold fusion is the fusion of 2 hydrogen atoms to one helium at low tempereture
sean kirschner he does not seem to know what the word "array" means, no whu would you expect him to now what "fusion" means?
Thats what happens in hot fusion. 2 Hydrogen are forced to fuse and break the Coulomb barrier. In LENR, low energy Nuclear Reactions, The Hydrogen gains Neutrons, up to 4, once it hits 4 neutrons, it "decays" into Helium, i guess. And the "decay" part is Beta-decay
i also forgot one thing. fusion will only occur at temperatures over 15 000 000 degrees celsius.
@FatLingon Silly person, I never said it was cold fusion, I just found it funny that you called it the mysterious white powder, that's all.
After all, cold fusion is the holy grail of science.
electric eels perform cold fusion within the waters giving you an exciting experience but they perform cold fusion within the cells of their body
a geiger counter and a way of measuring helium output would add some validity to this experiment
Some people have made comments that this is a high school experiment and this is true to some extent, but there is sometimes here.
just wondering if you could tell us what your current and voltage in is compared to the current and voltage out. is the 250 volts the power being supplied or the power being produced? ..... heh
This here is hydrogen burning - nothing to do with nuclear fussion.Fusing hydrogen into helium usually happens in the core of a star where the pressure and heat are unimaginable and that's why cold fusion is considered impossible.However if someone actually figures out how to create cold fusion he will instantly become the richest person in the history of the world, for cold fusion is an infinite energy source and(unlike nuclear fission) emits absolutely no radiation which makes it totaly clean.
holy tamole!! This guy was on "The Colony"!
I was wondering where I can find a variac for such an experiment? The variac goes to a transformer? Then to the electrodes?
This is the type of guy that sold Uranium tablets for "health" 100 years ago
YA KOOL ,THOUGHT YOU SAID COLD FUSION ,LOOKING AT THE THERMOMETER IT IS WARM ,SO WARM FUSION? NOW IF YOU SHUT OFF THE INPUT JUICE WILL IT CONTINUE TO REACT AND PRODUCE ELECTRICITY @220 VOLTS?
Looks like plasma electrolysis !
Are you sure this is not a chemical/electro-magnetic reaction?
R.I.P Michael, you shouldnt have uploaded this one.
you welcome.
if you like this you might like some applications. look up HHO, HHO car, or stan mayer on youtube or google also pretty cool.
@holywdtughguy
So did you think doing "the colony" was worth it? And did they tell you everything you were going to do and where to go throughout the show? I thought it was pretty good.
very nice, i would think it was similar to how a star is born. the RF noise can go way up causing the gas to become conductive. here you hit it with enough volts, and low amps. now think how can a gas be heated up in the same manner as the water was slowly, but with high frequency RF in the 22ooo kHz or even microwave frequency. like on the sun..
Hydrogen cells don't create fusionl, it's just small amounts of hydrogen reacting with oxygen. The reaction gives off quite a bit of energy with only water as a product, which is why NASA uses it for rocket fuel.
you created a star
If fusion is happening here you should be able to detect helium being generated. When one atom of hydrogen fuses with another atom of hydrogen you will have a lot of energy emitted and helium produced as a byproduct. If there is no helium generated then you would have to say that this is not nuclear fusion.
lol, cold fusion. " the process is going to be very violent and VERY HOT!
steam means nothing, coal and natural gas plants heat water and generate steam to run the dynamo. i can make steam with a zippo (lighter), dose that mean zippo uses cold fussion to light cigarettes?? acording to you, every time i make tea, and the pot whistles, that means theres cold fussion occoring in the kettle??
Can you repeat this experiment and test for helium. Seeing as helium is non flamable it would not be comsumed in the combustion of the hydrogen. To test for it you would only have to place a bag made of light plastic over to top of the unit to catch gasses given off. Seal the bag and let the gasses cool so the water vapour can condense.