I have had my healthpro plus for about fifteen years, still going strong. Filters last a long time but are expensive. Over the fifteen years + I feel I have gotten my money's worth. And the unit works very well.
I just found out that basically the version is simply the filter, I think that’s so cool!! I can basically order any version at all, and if I later feel like upgrading or downgrading I just buy and insert that less or more substantial filter in it and it’s as if I bought that version. Hell you can have an assortment of the filters in your closet and change units whenever you want!
The Austin sounds great... My biggest concern with it is the COMBINED FILTER. I never like those as the Carbon filter and the HEPA don't necessarily need replacement at the same time. I would love to see a followup video on these units that also includes SOUND levels and any other features (Auto/Timers/Shut-off, etc).
It was mentioned that both units are sufficient for large spaces. Unfortunately, very few people choose to run either of these noisy (on highest settings) units on the highest settings most of the time. The IQAir can handle 20% more air (though its price is certainly more than 20% greater...) than the Austin. This can be a very big deal. For a large room (which both are *capable* of treating) -or a small room, it is often preferable to be able to run the unit on a setting lower (preferably much lower) than the high setting. Yes, you can run it on high for a while and then lower it to maintain, but this is not always ideal (better than many might think though if the unit and room are well matched). IQAir allows for significantly greater cleaning at significantly lower settings than the Austin Air. Additionally, while it is frequently (and very rightly) said that HEPA media can effectively remove sub .3 micron particles, the higher efficiency H12/H13 filters used in the IQAir (and also used in all of the Medify Air units) are in fact considerably more capable than *many* other grades of HEPA filters used in most consumer grade HEPA air purifiers. This media IS more expensive AND requires more powerful fans to move the air, so I am not saying it is worth it for everyone, but the difference in performance potential is real and I believe should be acknowledged for sure. Austin Air's own information lists a 95% efficiency for the FR400B filter at "larger than" .1 micron -- without noting what CFM this performance is achieved at -- it is an E11 class HEPA filter (much easier to push air through as well). Austin Air might use an E12 class HEPA in Europe. Does it matter? Maybe, maybe not, **but it is absolutely correct** to say that statistically in the world of high efficiency filter media, this is a far cry from IQAir's 99.95% at its most penetrating particle size, which is .22 micron (H13 level) with an air flow rate of less than or equal to 112 CFM (granted this is a pewrry low setting) OR 99.5% at its most penetrating particle size, which is .16 micron (H12 level) with an air flow rate less than or equal to 280 CFM. I find it interesting that the higher fan rate for the Hyper Hepa IQAir filters = a smaller most penetrating particle size, is this a case of Brownian motion at play :-) ? From a technical perspective, between the two units, IQAir has the undeniably superior (by a statistically large margin) particle filtration both in volume and efficiency. Austin Air's carbon filter is an absolute and utter beast and works astoundingly well. They do use zeolite (chemically related to asbestos * see cancer.org) and there are a number of cancer concerns about that material, but how big of a concern that actually is in this application is definitely up for debate and to be fair, the type of zeolite they use is supposedly very pure and eliminates the typical concerns. Again, this is up for debate. I personally do not see it as a concern and find the Austin Air units to be well above average. Some might have a concern however and should perhaps be aware (zeolite was mentioned in the video though). IQAir's "blend" in the carbon filter is chemically excellent, BUT many find a number of the IQAir gas filters to output a peculiar odor comparatively * again not something that I have had issue with around multiple units, but worth mentioning.
Great comment and analysis. I made my research and also went for IQAir because of zeolite concerns. I found that IQAir's filter leaks some minor odour that is noticeable when you enter the room after a significant time outside.
@@alexdzyubenko5092 Thanks Alex! For the record (full disclosure). I've (probably obvious) been around a number of air-purifiers of various brands. I actually choose both Austin Air & IQAir for my personal units :-). The zeolite in the Austin units is different from that which is typically a concern and is placed before the HEPA as well. None-the-less, it is a concern for many potential buyers and Austin Air does not provide much information up front to explain why it is not an issue (you have to search for it). And while I like to be aware of the technical differences of various purifiers, I am willing to admit that unless we are talking about clean-room type situations, the Austin Air is BEYOND excellent and will provide air as good as or better than in *many* operating rooms despite what wikipedia says about operating room systems commonly used. Though it is listed at 95% efficiency at .1 micron, like all HEPA filters, it (the E11 True HEPA in Austin Air units NOTE: Austin Air might be E12 used in Europe...) increases in efficiency below and above the "most penetrating" particle size and increase in efficiency with use. I acknowledge that there is no evidence or reason to believe that any of these differences will REALLY make a personal difference where "health" and room air purifiers are concerned (even for sensitive individuals). However, unsealed or poorly sealed systems (not a concern for either Austin or IQAir) and systems with small filters that load quickly and therefore decrease air changes -- this is CAN be a concern and defeat the point of these units. Systems with technology that perform extremely well to start with, but decreases in efficiency can be an issue (again, no real problem for either of these systems). So I guess what I am saying in a ridiculously long-winded way, is that I believe you have made an OUTSTANDING and virtually no compromise choice with the IQAir. I also believe that from a practical standpoint the Austin provides the same, *but absolutely not from a technical standpoint since E11/H11 are NOT the same (technically) as H12/H13*. And yes, the Austin Air has a 20% lower CFM. This is understandable though with the Austin Air having 15 pounds of carbon media vs. 5 and 13% (or 33% depending on source of information) more HEPA material. But it does not change the fact that the IQAir moves 20% more air and will let 4.5% less of the most penetrating particle size through the filter. As for the odour you mentioned. I have found that nearly ALL the units I've been around with any substantial carbon content do actually output a distinct smell. It is "clean" smelling to me, and some people may think it is a problem. Again, I have not been around any units with more than a couple pounds of activated carbon/carbon blend that did not have this particular smell. If it "stinks", then it's time to swap it out. The blend in IQAir V5 cell is absolutely brilliant by the way.
@@ABG2412 Great analysis, thank you very much! Yes, I understand that zeolite is beyond a filter and probably has a certain grade of purity that is not harmful. However, I read a number of scientific publications that raise concern for zeolite and decided that if I count so much on this last frontier, it should not contain something that can leak even hypotetncally. Let's say, someone dropped the unit and now it has a broken HEPA seal which releases portions of pm2.5 or less from the absorbing body due to vibrations. I also like the fact that IQAir is modular and I can put V5 carbon filter on a shelf until the wildfires season starts if I get tired with the odour
We have a Blueair 505 that just broke after 2 years. It simply does not turn on. Manufacture warranty is 1 year (unless you register then they extend it to 2 years). Its very difficult to get a hold of someone on the phone. I finally got someone through email, but basically they said, it has no warranty and they can't do anything. They recommended a local repair shop, but these days there aren't many electronic repair shops, plus I don't think any local repair shop will have the specific Blueair parts. Pretty disappointed with Blueair since we spent $650 on this unit. The one thing that I would recommend is, if you are spending over $500 on an air purifier make sure that it comes with long warranty. I thought I would share this with those who are considering a new air purifier, hope it helps!
I have two Austin Units. Something to know - they sell a HealthMate, a Healthmate Allergy Machine, and a Healthmate Plus. Each one being a step up on fumes and VOC component with the Plus being the one with Zeolite for maxium chemical removal. That unit in 2023 is now closer to $900. The filters in the Austin Air - last 4-5 years. Not sure how long the IQ lasts. Also one little secrete about Austin Air units is that the base machine are ALL the same. Only the filters are different. So if you bought the cheaper Plain Healthmate and in 4-5 years you could replace the filter with the top of the line Healthmate Plus filter - just will cost more for that replacement filter.
This Austin air purifyer is a GREAT product! My neighbour down stairs is a smoker and the smoke comes in by the inside and I am allergic to second hand smoke... I was thinking of moving but my mother lives next door of me (91 yo) and tried Every thing I could to stay there. I bought a good quality air purifier ($300) but it was useless. Even my clothes in my wardrobe smell cigarette smoke! But since I have the Austin, I have no more problems with the smell. It is VERY EFFICIENT! I RECOMMAND IT 300%.
I was exposed to fiberglass dust and work dust during a demolition project at the hospital where I worked. I cannot tolerate exposure to VOCs especially formaldehyde, fiberglass or work dust from demolition, construction or renovation, and the toxic heavy metals test says I am full of all of the metals tested, and mycotoxin test is abnormal. These tests were finally completed by a specialist a year after my exposure and almost fatal reaction. I am supposed to stay away from any chemical exposure so that has pretty much left me unemployed and in my house. If they get around to approving my WC benefits I can hopefully get treatment. Soooo.... I would really appreciate it if you would review the air testing equipment. When they tell you another exposure would be fatal it would be nice to be able to know what is in my air so maybe I could feel safer leaving the house.
That's crazy! I can't believe that workers are still dealing with the concern of being exposed to harmful chemicals/metals in 2020; we as employees must demand more from our employers!
IQ Air has a lot more products than just the ones easily found on their website, they have commercial and medical and cleanroom products. It's difficult to find, however. Example: www.iqair.com/us/support/accessories?id=71
@@VenturaIT What the... It doesn't even show results for specifically ultrafine particules, and it compares it to synthetic hepa, and other technologies, not the "hepa" which several brands use. and even those other technologies, synthetic hepa, etc. have a 50% efficiency. which show, it does do something at least. Like take a look at "Efficiency was determined for mold spore size particles (3.0-5.0 microns" Any hepa filter would get 99.97% on that. Those 3 other technologies were below 95%. Lmao, IQair with their hyperhepa marketing, yet cannot provide one study to prove and back it up, that it is better than other HEPAs ! . . .
Thanks for all of these GREAT videos! They are extremely helpful in helping choose a new air purifier for me and my family. A few questions: 1.We currently use the IQAir Healthpro. It has been very effective and claims to have a much better HEPA filter than other brands, capturing particles as small as 0.003 microns. Is this level of filtration confirmed by any independent 3rd parties and does that level of filtration matter vs. every other reputable unit that claims 0.3 microns? The price of replacing filters and the 2 floor layout of our new home make it questionable if the IQAir is still the right purifier for us. 2. In consideration of the 2 floor apartment, you recommended purchasing 2 smaller units, the Winix or the Coway Mighty to cover the area more efficiently as the CFM will reach up to 500 vs. 300CFM from the IQAir or 450CFM from the largest Coway. We agree with this thinking but would like to know if the smaller units with smaller HEPA filter medi and smaller amounts of carbon pellet media(the new Mighty has carbon pellets) will be as effective than one larger unit(our IQAir or the Austin). We can't afford two large units so that's not a consideration for us. 3. How do you test these units? You mention the testing is extensive but there is nowhere to learn more on your website. Thanks again for the great reviews of the various units!
1. Any HEPA filter is able to remove particles as small as 0.003 microns from the air. I discuss how and why in detail here: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/hepa-air-purifier/ 2. A smaller unit like the Winix or the Coway Mighty will be able to remove particles just about as well as the IQAir or Austin but it won't be able to remove unwanted gases like VOCs and odors as well. 3. Our testing is discussed in individual model reviews: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/best-air-purifier/#reviews
@@consumer-analysis Thank you so much for the responses! They were extremely helpful. I just happened upon the Austin Air Healthmate Junior and I see that you guys haven't reviewed it yet. It seems to have a lot more gas filtration media than either the Winix or the Coway Mighty. Please let me know if that means it's a more complete filtration system or if that feature doesn't outweigh the benefits of features like higher CFM in the Winix and Coway. The Healthmate Junior is only 200CFM vs 250CFM for the other units. Thanks again!
I don't get why you would trust a guy that just read information off a bulletin board. Where has he tested any of these purifiers? Buy a meter, and test them. IQ Air also has a 10 year warranty which speaks volumes. If you want to compare a $120 Winimax which tree his guy is clearly selling to that of a $900 IQ Air which are used in hospitals, military layouts and in dentist offices. Be my guest. Trust your health to the Winimax then. Lol. Just saying. There is no comparison on any level.
Thank you @consumer analysis for another great review! I work in the dental field and reducing viral load from aerosol is important to me. I was wondering what your thoughts are on air purifiers specifically to reduce the amount of virus in the air. Many people look at iqair because of its "HyperHepa" filtration like Dan Weiner mentioned in the comments. Other people have recommended Enviroklenz because it has a UVC light. I know this is a consumer based channel, but I'm sure there is a consumer demand for people who want a air purifier specifically for Coronavirus. I'm sure a video on this topic would be quite popular! Even if it's just you explaining the information you've already provided us like your guide from your website. Thanks again for your hard work!
A regular HEPA air purifier can remove viruses from the air. I discuss this topic in detail here: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/air-purifier-for-germs/ UV definitely works but is often poorly implemented in air purifiers as I discuss here: th-cam.com/video/hGo9dz4BKCQ/w-d-xo.html
Question. I got a little confused regarding The carbon filtration. The Austin has more pounds of carbon filtration over the iq. In this instance the difference makes a difference in the effectiveness? Because you mentioned in another video how the size of the iq air hepa filter doesn’t really make a difference except in terms of the saturation and replacement frequency. So the carbon system is different it isn’t just a matter of replacing the iq airs carbon filters more frequently? Hope I’m making sense 🤯
Yes, carbon filters work much differently than HEPA filters. I talk about carbon filters in detail in this write-up: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/carbon-air-filter/
thanks for your review! Trying to choose between the Austin air health mate plus or IQ air GC MultiGas to combat wildfire smoke in California. The smoke has caused me severe respiratory issues even though I was using Merv 13 filters and HEPA filters. I suspect it is because of the gases and vapors that are too small to be captured by those filters. what media works best for gases in addition to activated carbon (potassium permanganate, alumina, potassium iodide)? Any recommendations?
You're definitely on the right track with the Austin Air HealthMate. This guide I wrote on gas filtration should answer most of your questions: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/carbon-air-filter/
@@consumer-analysis thank you for your response! Out of curiosity, do any of the companies endorse you? Austin air systems for example? Are you completely unbiased?
There is absolutely NO independent testing or evidence that IQAir removes particles to .003 microns. The independent testing only covers the HEPA claim to .3 microns. They base their claims on their own internal lab testing. No way to actually prove the validity of this until an independent lab verifies it.
@@gaiusgracchus7475 Here's an independent test, although I wish it would be better and have more information about the ultrafine particles. www.fabri-technic.com/air_download/IndepLabTest.pdf
I’ve used IQ air and Q is correct. It filters dust particles much better and as he said on particle size. It’s on their website. I have found nothing in comparison yet
Bought a air doctor pro but I may cancel it and get the Austin air . Nice review. Yeah maybe not everyone is having stock issues. Austin air said unavailable. The office at air doctor is having a communication break down. I hope I get them soon. Update got mine and have been using it daily. The ultra hepa filter and carbon filter works well. I sleep with it on every night.
My problem that i am most concerned about is vapors from dry-cleaning chemicals (remediation/ sparging in process now). I am also right above a 4 lane traffic light, near a bus idle zone, a gas station, and some kind of big diesel-powered thing across the street. I might also have other issues such as formaldehyde. My tvoc is high with windows open or closed.
These guides should go a long way in helping you choose the best air purifier for your situation: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/carbon-air-filter/ www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/air-purifier-for-pollution/
Hi I'm in the UK your reviews are very informative. Please could you give the price of the replacement filter packs. As I had an iQair healthpro I sold it on eBay as the filters didn't last long. There was an unpleasant sweet smell. So I had to buy new ones that cost £150 UK pounds. We can buy the winix 5500-2 in the UK but not sure about the Austin ?
Hello! i am trying to decide between IQ Air Multi Gas and Austin Air Healthmate Plus by tomorrow. My problem is toxic vapos from dry cleaning chemicals. Which one will be best?
AirPura products are arguably better than both the IQ Air and the Austin Air offerings. You can customize both the filter and the carbon for the specific application, and the AirPura is capable of filling the VOC role at lower speeds, or the particulate role at higher speeds, whereas the IQ Air and Austin Air are less effective in the particulate role considering the AirPura can move over twice the air of these. Further, AirPura offers a few treated activated carbons that expand its chemical abatement capabilities beyond what the IQ Air and Austin Air are capable of.
I own the IQAir but I need a filter for recycled rubber gym flooring I’m about to install and I’m confused at which one would be better for the off gasing from the rubber mats in an enclosed home gym area with practically no ventilation. Regardless of price I’m trying to pick the better air filter. Thoughts?
If you already have the IQAir I would just use it - assuming you have the V5-Cell gas and odor filter installed in it. Even if you don't have the V5-Cell, I would suggest buying it for your IQAir over buying a whole different air purifier. That all being said, the Austin Air will remove gases faster than the IQAir as its gas filter contains 15 lb. of gas filtration media vs. only 5 lb. in the IQAir's V5-Cell.
Consumer Analysis I’m buying a new air filter regardless, because the IQ air units are for the bedrooms upstairs. So I will get the Austin for the gym, thanks!
any reason why there was no mention of the particle size difference? iq claims to filter down to 0.003 microns whereas austin air is 0.3 like most other air purifiers out there. that seems to be a huge difference that would sway in favor of iq
great question which i also like to know the answer. 0.3ppm can filter viruses suspended on water particles (from coughing). But 0.003ppm can filter airborne viruses. And that is a big difference...
I just moved in a new apartment and it needs to off gas plus I have a mold sensitivity. I’m considering the Austin Air which is about $700.00 now. My new apartment don’t seem to have a mold issue like my last but the VOC’s is making me want to move😭 Is the IQAir better for gases?
Stephanie R Well clearly I asked for more clarification! Making these decisions especially when trying to heal isn’t taken lightly. So if you can’t add to it with information then……….
I found your channel and like if very much. I wanted to suggest comparing the IQ Air HealthPro Plus (Swiss made) against the Intellipure Super V (US made).
What are your thoughts or have you looked into the air dog x5 and x8 air purifiers?? I think they sound promising but the short warranty and unproven track record seem risky
Hey there! Have you seen LIFAair LA500+ ? The price is about $800, nice esthethics, a lot of carbon - I am curious what do you think? I am deciding between winix and LIFAair. Thank you!
I would recommend multiple Winix units as you're more likely to require a lot of CFM (which multiple Winix units provide) vs excellent VOC/odor filtration (which the Austin excels in) in a classroom environment.
Winix is not a good brand - read reviews in different places. Some family friends bought some and we tested the air and it does not do a good job of filtration at all. The built-in air indicator lights show air is pure when the machines are in a provably polluted environment.
It is often pointed out that indicators on air purifiers are typically garbage, Austin doesn’t even play along in that gimicky worthless feature. You’re really supposed to buy a dedicated device for that. And although I can’t say one way or another whether or not Winix pays this dude, he does point towards their more significant carbon filter than other purifiers in its price point (including the housing), and he also stresses how clutch it is that Winix has a removable and cleanable pre-filter.
I've yet to test any Oransi units but looking at specifications alone I'd go with the EJ120 if particle filtration is your priority and the Austin if unwanted gas (VOC, odor) filtration is your priority.
Thank you for your informative videos. Very impressed. I am in Australia and can’t seem to find the Winix 5500-2. We do however have Winix Zero+ Pro 5-Stage Air Purifier do you know anything about this model? It’s about $580AUD I do have the option to buy the 5500-2 from the US but then risk it not working even if I got the power plug changed due to different voltage? Not sure but we have different plugs.
I usually recommend either the Zero or Zero+ to international viewers. The Zero+ is essentially a 5500-2 with slightly higher CFM. As such, I think it's a great choice as long as you can find it at a reasonable price.
It’s called the Australia tax. Austin air that is $600 U.S cost Australians $1800 AUD or 1300U.S. The winix stage 5 pro is excellent and did very good in choice tests
These machines were made for people who have serious health issues. Like they need something that can keep them alive, or not in constant discomfort. These things are usually used in hospitals and clean rooms.
I only hesitate to buy these 2 since there are so many recent reviews of the IQair being pungeant out of the box and the Austin unit is delivered often dirty and or badly damaged. I really want to get a powerful air purifier that isnt so likely to have so many problems. These drew me because one simple function, two not made in China, and three ships to California.
How would you rate the airdog X3/5/8 (xiaomi X3/5/7)air purifiers? They claim to be better than HEPA and PCO utilizing TPO tech but I'm unsure, they seem to be under the name Xiaomi in China and are slightly cheaper there
Consumer Analysis www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XKW1N23/ref=cm_cr_arp_mb_bdcrb_top?ie=UTF8, I wouldn't say they're the most popular but in America they are known as airdog air purifiers and are sold here, I know your not a big fan of permanent air filters butat a $1000 price range I figured they must be doing something different and unique, I'd look forward to a review of them if you ever decide to do one😁 thanks again for your response!
IQ air was rated very low in South Korea where air purifier market is huge. It only performed 57% of what it claims to perform. Also it is was loudest among other products that were tested. I'm not a big seller when it comes to quieter ones. It usually means its got weak fan that draws air into the unit but IQ air was much louder than others. Long warranty is not my top priority as long as you choose trusted brand. It draws the air into the unit and blows out after going through filter which H13 is typical on most popular units. If you want a working unit to clean the air in your place, it has to be set at highest for at least an hour to effectively do its job and most units will be loud. I chose airmega 400s during a deal for $450 because of its design and large area it covers(draws air in from two sides). One giant size unit won't clean air to you entire living area. It would be better to buy smaller unit that can cover 200-300sq for each room or space.
Interesting information dan. Do you have a link to the Korean tests. I would be very interested to see them. There is ample testing to place the IQAir in a good position, but different tests are conducted differently and favor different systems so I am interested to see the Korean tests you reference. I enjoy seeing all the information out there. Thank you for sharing! I stand by the assertion that the massive Austin Air carbon/HEPA combo are exceptional. As for the 57% performance on the IQAir - one of the problems with their marketing claims (of which their are MANY) is that their coverage is based on minimal air changes. Blueair for example lists their coverage based on 5 air changes per hour... IQ (and Austin) along with many others do not calculate based on very many air changes per hour. The IQAir, on it's top speed would be suited to provide 4 air changes per hour in a 563 sq. ft. room (not the 1,100 + sq. ft. they suggest the unit is suited for) -- but this is optimistic if one were to go by room size based on CADR (if IQAir had any interest in that testing - but avoids it for various reasons). And no - not many units use H13 filter material. It limits air flow, requires more power hungry (and noisy) fans, and potentially needs to be replaced sooner as the already restricted air flow is further hindered. In practical application H12 and H11 are MORE THAN sufficient *but still "technically" inferior*. One thing IQAir does very well is tightly seal everything -- so many systems REQUIRE frequent air changes because even if their filter material is True HEPA, the systems do a very poor job of fully sealing the flow from intake to exit. *Ultimately in a real world scenario, this is a MOOT point because if a unit cleans the air fast enough, the effect on the overall air in the room will be just as good if not better than a system with a superior seal*... To a point, how clean the air is on a single pass is not as important as how clean the air in the entire room ends up being (especially as other contaminants are being constantly introduced) and this is why some testing (like CADR) does not make IQAir look so good. Nonetheless, if a system is not sealed as well, it DOES need to compensate with more air changes.
If you can't post a link, why even say 57%? I couldn't find anything about that in a google search. Sounds bogus. Unless the unit was tested with a dirty filter, I don't even see how that could be possible, considering the triple knife edge sealing, and the way they have both DOP tested filters and also do a validation test prior to shipment. They also sell more than one type of unit, and you might be thinking of the gas phase unit that only really does gas filtering. All the tests and reviews I have seen on the IQair design show that it is one of the most effective consumer grade units on the market.
@@jonosterman2878 SK puts a big premium on looks, tech features (air quality sensors, wifi), noise, and energy efficiency. None of which the IQair excells at
Yes, I do test all of them. For more data driven analysis see my written reviews here: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/best-air-purifier/#reviews
This review is SUBSTANTIAL. not sure about the math on the gas filtration as the Austin is spread out over a large cylinder and the IQ Air is forced through a much smaller area and there appears to be some though in the design on how it's stored. I'd differ to the experts on that one. The extra 10lbs in media could just be marketing for all I know.
Good and informative video. But I would like to point out that the IQ Air Pre filter is a true HEPA filter in of itself .3 micron@99.95%--99.97%. Their primary Filter at the top is capable of even smaller filtration efficiency. This filter is capable and does capture particles down to .003 microns@99.95 efficiency. That is nearly 80 times smaller than a virus.
The top filter is a HEPA filter. All HEPA filters can filter particles smaller than 0.3 microns. See page 21 here: www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-136/pdfs/2003-136.pdf
@@ericstefko4852 I invite you to read my full analysis of HEPA filters. It addresses the common misconception that they cannot filter particles smaller than 0.3 microns: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/hepa-air-purifier/
This is your 4 th video trying to get people off the IQ air and on to Austin. You must work for Austin! Austin used to be good Austin sells for 800 plus not 5-6 hundred as you say. Austin is not made in the YS as you keep saying. It’s made in China and all the parts have been updated to inexpensive/ cheap Chinese parts. My Austin sounds like a tank and it’s 15 year old and I love it the new cheaper oversea Austin is even louder and has absolutely no features except for a toggle switch! No remote no digital readout no programming. I could go on and on . The new “ updated Austin” is cheaply made expensive for what you get and is made in Asia! You truly need to get your information correct. Why don’t you talk from experience, you are reading from a cheat sheet. This is not a true review. The old Austin I would be happy to own (and I do) the new Austin is a cheap copy of what it used to be. Don’t believe me go look at one. Todays price March 1 2023 the Austin is $ 882 on one site and $ 850on another. The 600-700 you are referring to is the Austin health mate jr and is for a small bedroom! How many more of these Austin shills did you do? I’m sure you either sell Austin or work for them
Thank you for your feedback. I show preference for the Austin Air over the IQAir in multiple videos mostly because both units offer similar particle filtration, while the Austin offers three times the gas filtration media , all at a lower price than the IQAir, even at current elevated prices. FWIW I do not work for Austin. I've never even been approached by them for sponsorship.
For that couple extra hundred bucks you get five extra years of warranty. I guess the real question would be which one would Las Vegas casinos put in their rooms. Is there medical grade air filtration systems that are even better.
I'm pretty sure they last up to 5 years, depending on how long you run them on average, so really it's $48ish/year vs $143.26/year for IQAir, assuming you run the machine for only 10 hours a day on 50% speed....That's a 66.5% price difference! Sources: www.iqair.com/us/room-air-purifiers/healthpro-series austinair.com/shop/healthmate-plus/
Keeping the air as clean as possible for the cheapest price. At the same time having the least amount of maintenance. I hear the air filter last five years before you have to replace it. How do you know that is going to last five years especially if there is some major catastrophe that pollutes the air far more than usual. In other words do you think this is the cheapest most efficient. And if you have a two-story house would you recommend buying one for each floor.
You need to use particle counters to verify the efficacy of the filters. The cheapest would be pm2.5 sensors, but proper sensor units from companies like Lighthouse can be very expensive, like 3-6k. For certain applications, like clean rooms, these sensors are permanently mounted, or integrated into the FFU itself. These also serve the purpose of verifying the facility or room is not being contaminated by mold or bacteria.
@@jonosterman2878 Is this the cheapest most efficient way?. I mean I don't have a problem paying top dollar for something that is the best. But I'm thinking of those at the bottom of the barrel financially.
so the Austin Air has more carbon. but the IQAir has a mixture of carbon and something else. How can you compare the 2 and say the Austin Air is better because it has more weight. maybe the mixture IQAir has does better job at absorbing than the Austin Air. I could create a filter with 20 pounds of dirt. and the air could spend 4 times longer than the Austin Air moving through the dirt. that doesn't mean it will be better than the 5 pounds of activated carbon in the Austin. or does it???
The units do the same job is the real world. The panel on the Swiss will break and warranty to ship that unit is expensive. The Austin's switch can be fix by any electrician if need be. The Austin is the better unit because of that, and is costs less.
dont mention the 10yr waaranty. higher cfu, healthmateplus retails for over 700.00. dont care how the air is distributed on only 1 side while the iqair is 360 degrees. austin air is extremely loud
I appreciate the review but you need to get a thesaurus. Find a different word than substantial. You said it at least twice a couple sentences in a row.
Someone looking for VOC filtration might not care about the particle filtration. Also, previous commenters have mentioned that there's a lack of independent lab verification of the HyperHEPA claims.
I have had my healthpro plus for about fifteen years, still going strong. Filters last a long time but are expensive. Over the fifteen years + I feel I have gotten my money's worth. And the unit works very well.
I just found out that basically the version is simply the filter, I think that’s so cool!! I can basically order any version at all, and if I later feel like upgrading or downgrading I just buy and insert that less or more substantial filter in it and it’s as if I bought that version. Hell you can have an assortment of the filters in your closet and change units whenever you want!
How is the Austin air for severe reduction of dangerous mold spores?
The Austin sounds great... My biggest concern with it is the COMBINED FILTER. I never like those as the Carbon filter and the HEPA don't necessarily need replacement at the same time.
I would love to see a followup video on these units that also includes SOUND levels and any other features (Auto/Timers/Shut-off, etc).
It was mentioned that both units are sufficient for large spaces. Unfortunately, very few people choose to run either of these noisy (on highest settings) units on the highest settings most of the time. The IQAir can handle 20% more air (though its price is certainly more than 20% greater...) than the Austin. This can be a very big deal. For a large room (which both are *capable* of treating) -or a small room, it is often preferable to be able to run the unit on a setting lower (preferably much lower) than the high setting. Yes, you can run it on high for a while and then lower it to maintain, but this is not always ideal (better than many might think though if the unit and room are well matched). IQAir allows for significantly greater cleaning at significantly lower settings than the Austin Air.
Additionally, while it is frequently (and very rightly) said that HEPA media can effectively remove sub .3 micron particles, the higher efficiency H12/H13 filters used in the IQAir (and also used in all of the Medify Air units) are in fact considerably more capable than *many* other grades of HEPA filters used in most consumer grade HEPA air purifiers. This media IS more expensive AND requires more powerful fans to move the air, so I am not saying it is worth it for everyone, but the difference in performance potential is real and I believe should be acknowledged for sure.
Austin Air's own information lists a 95% efficiency for the FR400B filter at "larger than" .1 micron -- without noting what CFM this performance is achieved at -- it is an E11 class HEPA filter (much easier to push air through as well). Austin Air might use an E12 class HEPA in Europe. Does it matter? Maybe, maybe not, **but it is absolutely correct** to say that statistically in the world of high efficiency filter media, this is a far cry from IQAir's 99.95% at its most penetrating particle size, which is .22 micron (H13 level) with an air flow rate of less than or equal to 112 CFM (granted this is a pewrry low setting) OR 99.5% at its most penetrating particle size, which is .16 micron (H12 level) with an air flow rate less than or equal to 280 CFM. I find it interesting that the higher fan rate for the Hyper Hepa IQAir filters = a smaller most penetrating particle size, is this a case of Brownian motion at play :-) ? From a technical perspective, between the two units, IQAir has the undeniably superior (by a statistically large margin) particle filtration both in volume and efficiency. Austin Air's carbon filter is an absolute and utter beast and works astoundingly well. They do use zeolite (chemically related to asbestos * see cancer.org) and there are a number of cancer concerns about that material, but how big of a concern that actually is in this application is definitely up for debate and to be fair, the type of zeolite they use is supposedly very pure and eliminates the typical concerns. Again, this is up for debate. I personally do not see it as a concern and find the Austin Air units to be well above average. Some might have a concern however and should perhaps be aware (zeolite was mentioned in the video though). IQAir's "blend" in the carbon filter is chemically excellent, BUT many find a number of the IQAir gas filters to output a peculiar odor comparatively * again not something that I have had issue with around multiple units, but worth mentioning.
Great comment and analysis. I made my research and also went for IQAir because of zeolite concerns. I found that IQAir's filter leaks some minor odour that is noticeable when you enter the room after a significant time outside.
@@alexdzyubenko5092 Thanks Alex! For the record (full disclosure). I've (probably obvious) been around a number of air-purifiers of various brands. I actually choose both Austin Air & IQAir for my personal units :-). The zeolite in the Austin units is different from that which is typically a concern and is placed before the HEPA as well. None-the-less, it is a concern for many potential buyers and Austin Air does not provide much information up front to explain why it is not an issue (you have to search for it). And while I like to be aware of the technical differences of various purifiers, I am willing to admit that unless we are talking about clean-room type situations, the Austin Air is BEYOND excellent and will provide air as good as or better than in *many* operating rooms despite what wikipedia says about operating room systems commonly used. Though it is listed at 95% efficiency at .1 micron, like all HEPA filters, it (the E11 True HEPA in Austin Air units NOTE: Austin Air might be E12 used in Europe...) increases in efficiency below and above the "most penetrating" particle size and increase in efficiency with use. I acknowledge that there is no evidence or reason to believe that any of these differences will REALLY make a personal difference where "health" and room air purifiers are concerned (even for sensitive individuals). However, unsealed or poorly sealed systems (not a concern for either Austin or IQAir) and systems with small filters that load quickly and therefore decrease air changes -- this is CAN be a concern and defeat the point of these units. Systems with technology that perform extremely well to start with, but decreases in efficiency can be an issue (again, no real problem for either of these systems).
So I guess what I am saying in a ridiculously long-winded way, is that I believe you have made an OUTSTANDING and virtually no compromise choice with the IQAir. I also believe that from a practical standpoint the Austin provides the same, *but absolutely not from a technical standpoint since E11/H11 are NOT the same (technically) as H12/H13*. And yes, the Austin Air has a 20% lower CFM. This is understandable though with the Austin Air having 15 pounds of carbon media vs. 5 and 13% (or 33% depending on source of information) more HEPA material. But it does not change the fact that the IQAir moves 20% more air and will let 4.5% less of the most penetrating particle size through the filter. As for the odour you mentioned. I have found that nearly ALL the units I've been around with any substantial carbon content do actually output a distinct smell. It is "clean" smelling to me, and some people may think it is a problem. Again, I have not been around any units with more than a couple pounds of activated carbon/carbon blend that did not have this particular smell. If it "stinks", then it's time to swap it out. The blend in IQAir V5 cell is absolutely brilliant by the way.
@@ABG2412 Great analysis, thank you very much!
Yes, I understand that zeolite is beyond a filter and probably has a certain grade of purity that is not harmful. However, I read a number of scientific publications that raise concern for zeolite and decided that if I count so much on this last frontier, it should not contain something that can leak even hypotetncally. Let's say, someone dropped the unit and now it has a broken HEPA seal which releases portions of pm2.5 or less from the absorbing body due to vibrations.
I also like the fact that IQAir is modular and I can put V5 carbon filter on a shelf until the wildfires season starts if I get tired with the odour
What an amazing comment, I’ve been researching these and hasn’t found this yet. Thank you.
@@ABG2412 If you have ever seen a winix purifier they appear to not seal that good but still have still been independently tested to perform excellent
We have a Blueair 505 that just broke after 2 years. It simply does not turn on. Manufacture warranty is 1 year (unless you register then they extend it to 2 years). Its very difficult to get a hold of someone on the phone. I finally got someone through email, but basically they said, it has no warranty and they can't do anything. They recommended a local repair shop, but these days there aren't many electronic repair shops, plus I don't think any local repair shop will have the specific Blueair parts. Pretty disappointed with Blueair since we spent $650 on this unit. The one thing that I would recommend is, if you are spending over $500 on an air purifier make sure that it comes with long warranty. I thought I would share this with those who are considering a new air purifier, hope it helps!
Strange as all blue air warranty I have seen has been 5 years
Sux for you 🤣🤣🤣 shouldnt have dumped so much money on an iffy company product. 🙊
I have two Austin Units. Something to know - they sell a HealthMate, a Healthmate Allergy Machine, and a Healthmate Plus. Each one being a step up on fumes and VOC component with the Plus being the one with Zeolite for maxium chemical removal. That unit in 2023 is now closer to $900. The filters in the Austin Air - last 4-5 years. Not sure how long the IQ lasts. Also one little secrete about Austin Air units is that the base machine are ALL the same. Only the filters are different. So if you bought the cheaper Plain Healthmate and in 4-5 years you could replace the filter with the top of the line Healthmate Plus filter - just will cost more for that replacement filter.
This Austin air purifyer is a GREAT product! My neighbour down stairs is a smoker and the smoke
comes in by the inside and I am allergic to second hand smoke... I was
thinking of moving but my mother lives next door of me (91 yo) and tried
Every thing I could to stay there. I bought a good quality air purifier
($300) but it was useless. Even my clothes in my wardrobe smell
cigarette smoke! But since I have the Austin, I have no more problems
with the smell. It is VERY EFFICIENT! I RECOMMAND IT 300%.
Which Austin machine did you go with? The healthmate, healthmate plus, or something else?
Which model of Austin Air do you use?
I was exposed to fiberglass dust and work dust during a demolition project at the hospital where I worked. I cannot tolerate exposure to VOCs especially formaldehyde, fiberglass or work dust from demolition, construction or renovation, and the toxic heavy metals test says I am full of all of the metals tested, and mycotoxin test is abnormal. These tests were finally completed by a specialist a year after my exposure and almost fatal reaction. I am supposed to stay away from any chemical exposure so that has pretty much left me unemployed and in my house. If they get around to approving my WC benefits I can hopefully get treatment. Soooo.... I would really appreciate it if you would review the air testing equipment. When they tell you another exposure would be fatal it would be nice to be able to know what is in my air so maybe I could feel safer leaving the house.
That's crazy! I can't believe that workers are still dealing with the concern of being exposed to harmful chemicals/metals in 2020; we as employees must demand more from our employers!
IQ Air has a lot more products than just the ones easily found on their website, they have commercial and medical and cleanroom products. It's difficult to find, however.
Example: www.iqair.com/us/support/accessories?id=71
@@VenturaIT What the... It doesn't even show results for specifically ultrafine particules, and it compares it to synthetic hepa, and other technologies, not the "hepa" which several brands use. and even those other technologies, synthetic hepa, etc. have a 50% efficiency. which show, it does do something at least.
Like take a look at "Efficiency was determined for
mold spore size particles (3.0-5.0 microns"
Any hepa filter would get 99.97% on that. Those 3 other technologies were below 95%.
Lmao, IQair with their hyperhepa marketing, yet cannot provide one study to prove and back it up, that it is better than other HEPAs ! . . .
Thanks for all of these GREAT videos! They are extremely helpful in helping choose a new air purifier for me and my family. A few questions:
1.We currently use the IQAir Healthpro. It has been very effective and claims to have a much better HEPA filter than other brands, capturing particles as small as 0.003 microns. Is this level of filtration confirmed by any independent 3rd parties and does that level of filtration matter vs. every other reputable unit that claims 0.3 microns? The price of replacing filters and the 2 floor layout of our new home make it questionable if the IQAir is still the right purifier for us.
2. In consideration of the 2 floor apartment, you recommended purchasing 2 smaller units, the Winix or the Coway Mighty to cover the area more efficiently as the CFM will reach up to 500 vs. 300CFM from the IQAir or 450CFM from the largest Coway. We agree with this thinking but would like to know if the smaller units with smaller HEPA filter medi and smaller amounts of carbon pellet media(the new Mighty has carbon pellets) will be as effective than one larger unit(our IQAir or the Austin). We can't afford two large units so that's not a consideration for us.
3. How do you test these units? You mention the testing is extensive but there is nowhere to learn more on your website.
Thanks again for the great reviews of the various units!
1. Any HEPA filter is able to remove particles as small as 0.003 microns from the air. I discuss how and why in detail here: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/hepa-air-purifier/
2. A smaller unit like the Winix or the Coway Mighty will be able to remove particles just about as well as the IQAir or Austin but it won't be able to remove unwanted gases like VOCs and odors as well.
3. Our testing is discussed in individual model reviews: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/best-air-purifier/#reviews
@@consumer-analysis Thank you so much for the responses! They were extremely helpful. I just happened upon the Austin Air Healthmate Junior and I see that you guys haven't reviewed it yet. It seems to have a lot more gas filtration media than either the Winix or the Coway Mighty. Please let me know if that means it's a more complete filtration system or if that feature doesn't outweigh the benefits of features like higher CFM in the Winix and Coway. The Healthmate Junior is only 200CFM vs 250CFM for the other units. Thanks again!
@@danweiner73 th-cam.com/video/Xc7XVqEyCHU/w-d-xo.html
I don't get why you would trust a guy that just read information off a bulletin board. Where has he tested any of these purifiers? Buy a meter, and test them. IQ Air also has a 10 year warranty which speaks volumes. If you want to compare a $120 Winimax which tree his guy is clearly selling to that of a $900 IQ Air which are used in hospitals, military layouts and in dentist offices. Be my guest. Trust your health to the Winimax then. Lol. Just saying. There is no comparison on any level.
Plus all he ever has is a laptop and the air purifiers on his desk he never even turns them on and tests them. What is he even reviewing
Thank you @consumer analysis for another great review! I work in the dental field and reducing viral load from aerosol is important to me. I was wondering what your thoughts are on air purifiers specifically to reduce the amount of virus in the air. Many people look at iqair because of its "HyperHepa" filtration like Dan Weiner mentioned in the comments. Other people have recommended Enviroklenz because it has a UVC light. I know this is a consumer based channel, but I'm sure there is a consumer demand for people who want a air purifier specifically for Coronavirus. I'm sure a video on this topic would be quite popular! Even if it's just you explaining the information you've already provided us like your guide from your website. Thanks again for your hard work!
A regular HEPA air purifier can remove viruses from the air. I discuss this topic in detail here: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/air-purifier-for-germs/
UV definitely works but is often poorly implemented in air purifiers as I discuss here: th-cam.com/video/hGo9dz4BKCQ/w-d-xo.html
This might be a better choice www.iqair.com/commercial/compact-stand-alone-air-filtration/dental-series
Question. I got a little confused regarding The carbon filtration. The Austin has more pounds of carbon filtration over the iq. In this instance the difference makes a difference in the effectiveness? Because you mentioned in another video how the size of the iq air hepa filter doesn’t really make a difference except in terms of the saturation and replacement frequency. So the carbon system is different it isn’t just a matter of replacing the iq airs carbon filters more frequently? Hope I’m making sense 🤯
Yes, carbon filters work much differently than HEPA filters. I talk about carbon filters in detail in this write-up: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/carbon-air-filter/
Totally agree with your assessment. Austin Air Bedroom unit is my all time favorite portable air unit -- I own two.
I appreciate the info, very concisely delivered and exactly what I am looking for. Thank you!
thanks for your review! Trying to choose between the Austin air health mate plus or IQ air GC MultiGas to combat wildfire smoke in California. The smoke has caused me severe respiratory issues even though I was using Merv 13 filters and HEPA filters. I suspect it is because of the gases and vapors that are too small to be captured by those filters. what media works best for gases in addition to activated carbon (potassium permanganate, alumina, potassium iodide)? Any recommendations?
You're definitely on the right track with the Austin Air HealthMate. This guide I wrote on gas filtration should answer most of your questions: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/carbon-air-filter/
@@consumer-analysis thank you for your response! Out of curiosity, do any of the companies endorse you? Austin air systems for example? Are you completely unbiased?
@@scifiwasabbi00 I'm not endorsed by any company. These are simply my unbiased opinions after all of my research and testing.
You need VOC absorption filter as well
great detail , great video , earned yourself a new sub
Thank you for a thorough review. I am curious of what you'd think of Airpura ( any of their models) in comparison to the Austin Air Healthmate ?
Yes, I'd like to know as well!
What filter will target the voc from traffic and gas stations?
Iqair used hyperHepa that can filter particles down to 0.003 micron vs Austin Air or any other purifier at most 0.1 micron. Absolutely not equal.
There is absolutely NO independent testing or evidence that IQAir removes particles to .003 microns. The independent testing only covers the HEPA claim to .3 microns. They base their claims on their own internal lab testing. No way to actually prove the validity of this until an independent lab verifies it.
@@gaiusgracchus7475 Here's an independent test, although I wish it would be better and have more information about the ultrafine particles.
www.fabri-technic.com/air_download/IndepLabTest.pdf
Unverified claims. Molekule make crazy claims as well does not make it true
@@gaiusgracchus7475 Oh, I didn't know that.
I’ve used IQ air and Q is correct. It filters dust particles much better and as he said on particle size. It’s on their website. I have found nothing in comparison yet
I brought 2 IQ air one where my wood stove is and one in the bedroom both work great
Bought a air doctor pro but I may cancel it and get the Austin air . Nice review. Yeah maybe not everyone is having stock issues. Austin air said unavailable. The office at air doctor is having a communication break down. I hope I get them soon.
Update got mine and have been using it daily. The ultra hepa filter and carbon filter works well. I sleep with it on every night.
Interesting. Well whatever the problem was it’s over now, I ordered an Austin Air and it shipped in a day.
Does the Austin have a washable pre-filter?
Please do a review on the Oransi Mod Air purifier.
also i bought the winix and i bought the blue air 211+ it has only been a few days using both but out the gate i give the edge to the winix 5500
My problem that i am most concerned about is vapors from dry-cleaning chemicals (remediation/ sparging in process now). I am also right above a 4 lane traffic light, near a bus idle zone, a gas station, and some kind of big diesel-powered thing across the street. I might also have other issues such as formaldehyde. My tvoc is high with windows open or closed.
These guides should go a long way in helping you choose the best air purifier for your situation:
www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/carbon-air-filter/
www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/air-purifier-for-pollution/
Hi
I'm in the UK your reviews are very informative.
Please could you give the price of the replacement filter packs.
As I had an iQair healthpro
I sold it on eBay as the filters didn't last long. There was an unpleasant sweet smell.
So I had to buy new ones that cost £150 UK pounds.
We can buy the winix 5500-2 in the UK but not sure about the Austin ?
Filter cost varies between $200 and $400 for most full size Austin air purifiers.
Hello! i am trying to decide between IQ Air Multi Gas and Austin Air Healthmate Plus by tomorrow. My problem is toxic vapos from dry cleaning chemicals. Which one will be best?
All things (including price) considered, I would recommend the Austin Air Healthmate Plus.
AirPura products are arguably better than both the IQ Air and the Austin Air offerings. You can customize both the filter and the carbon for the specific application, and the AirPura is capable of filling the VOC role at lower speeds, or the particulate role at higher speeds, whereas the IQ Air and Austin Air are less effective in the particulate role considering the AirPura can move over twice the air of these. Further, AirPura offers a few treated activated carbons that expand its chemical abatement capabilities beyond what the IQ Air and Austin Air are capable of.
I considered Airpura, but they have no trial period and require the customer pay any return shipping fees. Thoughts?
I own the IQAir but I need a filter for recycled rubber gym flooring I’m about to install and I’m confused at which one would be better for the off gasing from the rubber mats in an enclosed home gym area with practically no ventilation. Regardless of price I’m trying to pick the better air filter. Thoughts?
If you already have the IQAir I would just use it - assuming you have the V5-Cell gas and odor filter installed in it. Even if you don't have the V5-Cell, I would suggest buying it for your IQAir over buying a whole different air purifier. That all being said, the Austin Air will remove gases faster than the IQAir as its gas filter contains 15 lb. of gas filtration media vs. only 5 lb. in the IQAir's V5-Cell.
Consumer Analysis I’m buying a new air filter regardless, because the IQ air units are for the bedrooms upstairs. So I will get the Austin for the gym, thanks!
any reason why there was no mention of the particle size difference? iq claims to filter down to 0.003 microns whereas austin air is 0.3 like most other air purifiers out there. that seems to be a huge difference that would sway in favor of iq
great question which i also like to know the answer. 0.3ppm can filter viruses suspended on water particles (from coughing). But 0.003ppm can filter airborne viruses. And that is a big difference...
I just moved in a new apartment and it needs to off gas plus I have a mold sensitivity. I’m considering the Austin Air which is about $700.00 now. My new apartment don’t seem to have a mold issue like my last but the VOC’s is making me want to move😭
Is the IQAir better for gases?
Stephanie R Well clearly I asked for more clarification! Making these decisions especially when trying to heal isn’t taken lightly. So if you can’t add to it with information then……….
Where do I get the Austin health mate air purifier to buy?
Great work!
Thank you!
Another outstanding review. Thank you!!
Have any videos on the enviroklenz?
Unfortunately, no, I have yet to test any Enviroklenz products.
Do you plan to review the Enviroklenz?
I found your channel and like if very much. I wanted to suggest comparing the IQ Air HealthPro Plus (Swiss made) against the Intellipure Super V (US made).
It would be nice to hear what you think about the new Winix XLC Air Purifier.
What are your thoughts or have you looked into the air dog x5 and x8 air purifiers?? I think they sound promising but the short warranty and unproven track record seem risky
I generally do not recommend permanent air filter units although I will take a closer look at these if they become more popular in the United States.
Hey there! Have you seen LIFAair LA500+ ? The price is about $800, nice esthethics, a lot of carbon - I am curious what do you think? I am deciding between winix and LIFAair. Thank you!
If I were to buy an air purifier for a classroom, would it be better to get the Austin or multiple Winix?
I would recommend multiple Winix units as you're more likely to require a lot of CFM (which multiple Winix units provide) vs excellent VOC/odor filtration (which the Austin excels in) in a classroom environment.
Winix is not a good brand - read reviews in different places. Some family friends bought some and we tested the air and it does not do a good job of filtration at all. The built-in air indicator lights show air is pure when the machines are in a provably polluted environment.
@@consumer-analysis how much winix pay you every year?
It is often pointed out that indicators on air purifiers are typically garbage, Austin doesn’t even play along in that gimicky worthless feature. You’re really supposed to buy a dedicated device for that. And although I can’t say one way or another whether or not Winix pays this dude, he does point towards their more significant carbon filter than other purifiers in its price point (including the housing), and he also stresses how clutch it is that Winix has a removable and cleanable pre-filter.
Love your videos and the detail. Wondering if you have looked into oransi purifiers. Specifically the ej120. I'm torn between it and the Austin air.
I've yet to test any Oransi units but looking at specifications alone I'd go with the EJ120 if particle filtration is your priority and the Austin if unwanted gas (VOC, odor) filtration is your priority.
What do you think about Pure and Clean by Aerus? I am not finding much about it and it has me wondering.
I have both and I have the gc Iq air , I prefer the iq air but the filters go quick
Thank you for your informative videos. Very impressed. I am in Australia and can’t seem to find the Winix 5500-2. We do however have Winix Zero+ Pro 5-Stage Air Purifier do you know anything about this model? It’s about $580AUD I do have the option to buy the 5500-2 from the US but then risk it not working even if I got the power plug changed due to different voltage? Not sure but we have different plugs.
I usually recommend either the Zero or Zero+ to international viewers. The Zero+ is essentially a 5500-2 with slightly higher CFM. As such, I think it's a great choice as long as you can find it at a reasonable price.
It’s called the Australia tax. Austin air that is $600 U.S cost Australians $1800 AUD or 1300U.S. The winix stage 5 pro is excellent and did very good in choice tests
What about AllenAir? AirPura? There's more than those two!
These machines were made for people who have serious health issues. Like they need something that can keep them alive, or not in constant discomfort. These things are usually used in hospitals and clean rooms.
Im only off their website and the IQAir only offers 3 year's warranty not 5, and it says nothing about registering for a 10 year warranty...
I only hesitate to buy these 2 since there are so many recent reviews of the IQair being pungeant out of the box and the Austin unit is delivered often dirty and or badly damaged. I really want to get a powerful air purifier that isnt so likely to have so many problems. These drew me because one simple function, two not made in China, and three ships to California.
How would you rate the airdog X3/5/8 (xiaomi X3/5/7)air purifiers? They claim to be better than HEPA and PCO utilizing TPO tech but I'm unsure, they seem to be under the name Xiaomi in China and are slightly cheaper there
I generally do not recommend permanent air filter units although I will take a look at these if they become popular in the United States.
Consumer Analysis www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XKW1N23/ref=cm_cr_arp_mb_bdcrb_top?ie=UTF8, I wouldn't say they're the most popular but in America they are known as airdog air purifiers and are sold here, I know your not a big fan of permanent air filters butat a $1000 price range I figured they must be doing something different and unique, I'd look forward to a review of them if you ever decide to do one😁 thanks again for your response!
IQ air was rated very low in South Korea where air purifier market is huge. It only performed 57% of what it claims to perform. Also it is was loudest among other products that were tested. I'm not a big seller when it comes to quieter ones. It usually means its got weak fan that draws air into the unit but IQ air was much louder than others. Long warranty is not my top priority as long as you choose trusted brand. It draws the air into the unit and blows out after going through filter which H13 is typical on most popular units. If you want a working unit to clean the air in your place, it has to be set at highest for at least an hour to effectively do its job and most units will be loud. I chose airmega 400s during a deal for $450 because of its design and large area it covers(draws air in from two sides). One giant size unit won't clean air to you entire living area. It would be better to buy smaller unit that can cover 200-300sq for each room or space.
Interesting information dan. Do you have a link to the Korean tests. I would be very interested to see them. There is ample testing to place the IQAir in a good position, but different tests are conducted differently and favor different systems so I am interested to see the Korean tests you reference. I enjoy seeing all the information out there. Thank you for sharing! I stand by the assertion that the massive Austin Air carbon/HEPA combo are exceptional. As for the 57% performance on the IQAir - one of the problems with their marketing claims (of which their are MANY) is that their coverage is based on minimal air changes. Blueair for example lists their coverage based on 5 air changes per hour... IQ (and Austin) along with many others do not calculate based on very many air changes per hour. The IQAir, on it's top speed would be suited to provide 4 air changes per hour in a 563 sq. ft. room (not the 1,100 + sq. ft. they suggest the unit is suited for) -- but this is optimistic if one were to go by room size based on CADR (if IQAir had any interest in that testing - but avoids it for various reasons). And no - not many units use H13 filter material. It limits air flow, requires more power hungry (and noisy) fans, and potentially needs to be replaced sooner as the already restricted air flow is further hindered. In practical application H12 and H11 are MORE THAN sufficient *but still "technically" inferior*. One thing IQAir does very well is tightly seal everything -- so many systems REQUIRE frequent air changes because even if their filter material is True HEPA, the systems do a very poor job of fully sealing the flow from intake to exit. *Ultimately in a real world scenario, this is a MOOT point because if a unit cleans the air fast enough, the effect on the overall air in the room will be just as good if not better than a system with a superior seal*... To a point, how clean the air is on a single pass is not as important as how clean the air in the entire room ends up being (especially as other contaminants are being constantly introduced) and this is why some testing (like CADR) does not make IQAir look so good. Nonetheless, if a system is not sealed as well, it DOES need to compensate with more air changes.
If you can't post a link, why even say 57%? I couldn't find anything about that in a google search. Sounds bogus. Unless the unit was tested with a dirty filter, I don't even see how that could be possible, considering the triple knife edge sealing, and the way they have both DOP tested filters and also do a validation test prior to shipment. They also sell more than one type of unit, and you might be thinking of the gas phase unit that only really does gas filtering. All the tests and reviews I have seen on the IQair design show that it is one of the most effective consumer grade units on the market.
@@jonosterman2878 SK puts a big premium on looks, tech features (air quality sensors, wifi), noise, and energy efficiency. None of which the IQair excells at
I think it would be fair to compare the IQ air gas version to the Austin
Have you done any Medify Air purifier reviews?
Not yet. I do plan on testing them in the future.
Can you also review Amway Atmosphere Sky?
Do you actually test these units or is this just a comparison of their specs?
Yes, I do test all of them. For more data driven analysis see my written reviews here: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/best-air-purifier/#reviews
This review is SUBSTANTIAL. not sure about the math on the gas filtration as the Austin is spread out over a large cylinder and the IQ Air is forced through a much smaller area and there appears to be some though in the design on how it's stored. I'd differ to the experts on that one. The extra 10lbs in media could just be marketing for all I know.
What is substantial review. :).
Substantially substantial.
Your comment induced In me a substantially substantial smile😃
Good and informative video. But I would like to point out that the IQ Air Pre filter is a true HEPA filter in of itself .3 micron@99.95%--99.97%.
Their primary Filter at the top is capable of even smaller filtration efficiency. This filter is capable and does capture particles down to .003 microns@99.95 efficiency. That is nearly 80 times smaller than a virus.
The top filter is a HEPA filter. All HEPA filters can filter particles smaller than 0.3 microns. See page 21 here: www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-136/pdfs/2003-136.pdf
@@consumer-analysis sorry you are wrong. Educate yourself before you try to do a review www.iqair.com/ca/room-air-purifiers/healthpro-series
kind of sad he comes across as an expert but dropped the ball on what micron size particles the IQ Air can remove it is .003 micron size particles
@@ericstefko4852 I invite you to read my full analysis of HEPA filters. It addresses the common misconception that they cannot filter particles smaller than 0.3 microns: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/hepa-air-purifier/
@@consumer-analysis thanks I will give it a read
This is a no-brainer. Austin wins easily.
austin price tag is much higher than mentioned
This is your 4 th video trying to get people off the IQ air and on to Austin. You must work for Austin!
Austin used to be good Austin sells for 800 plus not 5-6 hundred as you say. Austin is not made in the YS as you keep saying. It’s made in China and all the parts have been updated to inexpensive/ cheap Chinese parts. My Austin sounds like a tank and it’s 15 year old and I love it the new cheaper oversea Austin is even louder and has absolutely no features except for a toggle switch! No remote no digital readout no programming. I could go on and on . The new “ updated Austin” is cheaply made expensive for what you get and is made in Asia! You truly need to get your information correct. Why don’t you talk from experience, you are reading from a cheat sheet. This is not a true review. The old Austin I would be happy to own (and I do) the new Austin is a cheap copy of what it used to be. Don’t believe me go look at one. Todays price March 1 2023 the Austin is $ 882 on one site and $ 850on another. The 600-700 you are referring to is the Austin health mate jr and is for a small bedroom! How many more of these Austin shills did you do? I’m sure you either sell Austin or work for them
Thank you for your feedback. I show preference for the Austin Air over the IQAir in multiple videos mostly because both units offer similar particle filtration, while the Austin offers three times the gas filtration media , all at a lower price than the IQAir, even at current elevated prices. FWIW I do not work for Austin. I've never even been approached by them for sponsorship.
The prices of the Austin Air purifiers have increased significantly, probably taking advantage of COVID-19 fears.
these are two massive filters…what type of customer would you recommend them to?
Have you looked at the Medify Air models? What can you tell us about those and how they stack up?
Looking at their specifications vs their price they look like good options. I do plan on reviewing them in the future.
Your shirt is dope
For that couple extra hundred bucks you get five extra years of warranty. I guess the real question would be which one would Las Vegas casinos put in their rooms. Is there medical grade air filtration systems that are even better.
You can get extended warranty with Austin Air for a couple hundred bucks, pack of prefilters included. Atleast on the Canada website.
@@lxMaDnEsSxl I don't know how that's possible considering additional filters are $250 alone.
Substantial
This is not an equal review. You needed the IQAir GC to compare
The criteria per the title is under $1K, the GC is $1,300.
Where's your independent test data?
See my written reviews here: www.consumeranalysis.com/guides/air-purifiers/best-air-purifier/#reviews
I was gonna get an Austin air based on your recommendation but looked up replacement filters for it . $240.00
I'm pretty sure they last up to 5 years, depending on how long you run them on average, so really it's $48ish/year vs $143.26/year for IQAir, assuming you run the machine for only 10 hours a day on 50% speed....That's a 66.5% price difference!
Sources:
www.iqair.com/us/room-air-purifiers/healthpro-series
austinair.com/shop/healthmate-plus/
Yeah but it’s every 5 years do the math other purification system every six months way more expensive !
@@malibération well ok guess I didnt research how long they last thanks
@@davidguerra9896 yup effect six said the same thing.. thanks
Also, Austin Air will (generously) pro-rate the replacement filter under 5 years.
Keeping the air as clean as possible for the cheapest price. At the same time having the least amount of maintenance. I hear the air filter last five years before you have to replace it. How do you know that is going to last five years especially if there is some major catastrophe that pollutes the air far more than usual. In other words do you think this is the cheapest most efficient. And if you have a two-story house would you recommend buying one for each floor.
You need to use particle counters to verify the efficacy of the filters. The cheapest would be pm2.5 sensors, but proper sensor units from companies like Lighthouse can be very expensive, like 3-6k. For certain applications, like clean rooms, these sensors are permanently mounted, or integrated into the FFU itself. These also serve the purpose of verifying the facility or room is not being contaminated by mold or bacteria.
@@jonosterman2878 Is this the cheapest most efficient way?. I mean I don't have a problem paying top dollar for something that is the best. But I'm thinking of those at the bottom of the barrel financially.
so the Austin Air has more carbon. but the IQAir has a mixture of carbon and something else. How can you compare the 2 and say the Austin Air is better because it has more weight. maybe the mixture IQAir has does better job at absorbing than the Austin Air. I could create a filter with 20 pounds of dirt. and the air could spend 4 times longer than the Austin Air moving through the dirt. that doesn't mean it will be better than the 5 pounds of activated carbon in the Austin. or does it???
SUBSTANTIAL!
substantial
Austin air is NOT sealed - no comparison
The units do the same job is the real world. The panel on the Swiss will break and warranty to ship that unit is expensive. The Austin's switch can be fix by any electrician if need be. The Austin is the better unit because of that, and is costs less.
Shame you don’t get Xiaomi air purifiers there. They punch way above there weight
I don't want to hurt their feelings but this must be the battle for the 2 ugliest air purifiers on the market 😄
dont mention the 10yr waaranty. higher cfu, healthmateplus retails for over 700.00. dont care how the air is distributed on only 1 side while the iqair is 360 degrees. austin air is extremely loud
Drink whenever he says “substantial”. 🍻
He talks and talks says little, get to the point! You are wasting time.
I appreciate the review but you need to get a thesaurus. Find a different word than substantial. You said it at least twice a couple sentences in a row.
I plan on scripting videos in the future which should hopefully fix issues like this.
He doesn't now what he is talking about: the IQ air filter uses Hyper Hepa, which is better than tha HEPA fillter. Learn your products.
Someone looking for VOC filtration might not care about the particle filtration. Also, previous commenters have mentioned that there's a lack of independent lab verification of the HyperHEPA claims.
this dude is biased asf lmao why thought idk