Disclaimer : I do not support what Axis done ! It's important to share the crime that they done to not forget and be trap once again in a terrible era like this...
@@learngeopolitic is that important? They knowingly killed millions of civilians in this war, they shot prisoners and doctors just as they attacked children and families with their damn planes.
Germany wasn't on the good side, it wasn't on the bad side, it was on its side against the British who were on their side, there were no good or bad sides in the first world War only the second@@VoidMaster99
They where strong but they overestimated their power thinking that they could just lead a war with the soviets with still being at war with the allies is dumb, they had to use all their troops into the eastern and hardly protect their beaches hence the battle of Normandy, the soviets also quickly drained the german army making both sides tired but with the sweet equipment from the usa the germans stood no chance THEY EVEN DECLARED WAR ON THE US which was another dumb decision
@@learngeopolitices q China también fue colonia de Japón en la segunda guerra mundial, aproximadamente el 25% del territorio chino formó parte del Imperio de Japón
@@learngeopoliticit didn't want to. When studying history, it is important to take into account the context so as not to be a soyjak-😱 The Axis was initially primarily an anti-Comminter coalition (that’s why Japan suddenly appeared here) The USSR in its “entry” looked for a practical meaning in this, for strengthening. The USSR is the first socialist state whose goal was to destroy the exploitative power in the rest of the world. Those. Germany would not be a long-term ally. Therefore, before “joining” the coalition, the USSR put forward very serious demands on Germany (which Germany did not want to fulfill), while Germany had the goal of destroying France and England (which, unfortunately for Germany, was unlucky, because Germany before the war wanted only Poland, the USSR and Eastern Europe), destroy them and only then destroy the lonely USSR with the resources of Britain and France (after the start of the war with France and Britain) Once again: Germany proposed. The USSR, seeing the danger in Germany, put forward demands to be ready for war. Hitler was indignant, because the plans were to attack the USSR. Entry did not take place Reactionary forces against the labor movement are precisely what drive the thesis “did you know that the USSR wanted to become part of the Axis. Oh, how bad they are😱” A similar situation occurred when the USSR tried to join NATO. In both cases there was hypocrisy of both the Axis and NATO (NATO consists of the countries of the center of the world economic system, which feed the countries of the periphery through unequal exchange, no, this is not an accusation, this is a notification, although there are exceptions in the form of the Balkans and Turkey, there is probably a logical materialistic pragmatic explanation for this) Don’t worry, I’m not a rabid chauvinist, xenophobe, of which there are a lot of people in MODERN parafascist Russia
@@Somegoodpersonthey couldn’t breach mountainous terrain and even if they had more troops they couldn’t - for 500 years not even the Turks could capture Epirus which is below Albania in northern greeece
They where in 1vs a lot after operation Barbarossa and Moscow counter attack. They fought Poland alone, they fought France alone (France was alone because we can't say that Benelux has an army, and the royal navy just spawn and then disapear), they fought Yougoslavia alone, they fought the british alone (battle of Britain) and then when Europe was under german control (except Britain) they fought USSR alone until the counter offensive in Moscow and then Free France fought in USSR Air force, USA help USSR etc.... And for not censoring Germany flag I think history shouldn't bé censored !
@@learngeopolitic but most of their allies betrayed them(except Japan and a few other countries, but Japan only focused conquering Asia and fighting USA. So Japan kinda useless) in 44-45 so it's kinda correct if Germany did 1v4
@@learngeopoliticBut where do you study history? On Mickey Mouse? In Africa England was faced by Italy. And in Yugoslavia there was the Seconda Armata, which was the only Axis army that never suffered defeat. Or the Heresgruppen B (which made up 50%of the Wehrmacht troops in Russia) in Russia managed to escape from Russia thanks to the sacrifice of the Italians. Without Italy Germany could not resist beyond 1941. Now delete your comment and go to study history before you write nonsense
@@learngeopoliticItaly has managed to break through the Ligne Alpine (Petite Ligne Maginot),and to conquer even Menton. But you’re just a French who believes in a battle that never happened
@@giudicedredd9195 First of all read again my comment, try to understand and then give a proper answer. I say that Germany fought its enemies not in 1v4 but often in 1v1 or as you say 2v2/3v3 (let's take the example of Greece where Italy and Germany fought against the Greeks and the English). Before insulting me you should try to understand the meaning of a comment. Good day.
Italy's total military strength,economy and allies destroy Greece. We initially lost because it was Winter,our soldiers were not motivated,and the Greek were being helped by the Brits. See it like how Russia should be demolishing Ukraine because of his total military strength, economy and allies,but it isn't because of Nato helping Ukraine (and having better equipments.).
@@lindawahren9267 i'm not playing.I am speaking facts. Russia is rank 2 most strongest country in the world,and it's still not making any great advances in Ukraine since the start war. And Ukraine is even entering Russia. Just like Greece did with Italy, by invading the Southern part of the Italian Protectorate of Albania.
@@gabri0109that’s kinda true but I still don’t think Italy could have just sent all their troops and shi because they needed equipment Same with Russia they can’t send 2 million soldiers because they don’t have the equipment to just send them and wipe Ukraine like a hoi4 game
@@gabri0109 κορόιδο Μουσολίνι... κανείς σας δεν θα μείνει....και εσύ και η Ιταλία η πατρίδα σου η γελοία τρέμετε όλοι το χακί...δεν έχεις διόλου μπέσα....και όταν θα μπούμε μέσα.... ακόμα και στην Ρώμη γαλανόλευκη θα υψώσουμε σημαίνει Ελληνική!!!!
Ich persönlich hasse ihn nicht. Ich mag ihn einfach nicht. Und ja er hat wirklich Deutschland zu einer stärke und einer Einheit geführt die wir heute auch bräuchten. Militärisch gesehen.
@@Mistergoldengamer1 now tell me. How effective were those allies? Italy needed help with the fucking GREEK. The Balkans were mostly a non-party to the point *italy* is considered a more important factor and a major axis power. And japan couldn't help with germany. So all in all. It was germany v everyone.
There is no way ussr would have win against germany without whole allies and american industries In would be germany wining with high diff for ussr and usa
What you say is a completely defensible point of view. But for my part, Germany could not win against the USSR even without support from the allies. Long before American industries financed certain Soviet armed forces, Russia managed to hold the siege of Leningrad alone, they managed to counter Operation Typhoon and make a counterattack on Moscow. It was from this moment (January 1942) that the Germans began to lose.
@@learngeopolitic winters slowed germans and also Americans were supporting whole finance and equipments , also germans were busy at 2 front war without American industries , British intelligence and Russian men germany could not be defeated I don't remembered who told this quote
@@ATrivedi-sp9hs At the begining of operation Barbarossa Germany was only against USSR (the air War against brits don't count and in North Africa Italy was fighting the brits alone). Yes winter save USSR but it's normal winter is the historical savior of soviets. But I agree with you it's a real debate !
@@LL-dl3cw Yes they fought in different front but not between juin 1941 and december 1941 (operation Barbarossa time). After 1941 they have to fought in North Africa and in the eastern front + in 1943 in Italy and in 1944 in western France
That’s exactly what I thought! You guys played a crucial role in stopping Japan, it should’ve been “high difficulty” or “medium difficulty” (as Britain and the kiwis helped). You guys did great!
He didn't speak well English. I am Russian, and I listened to an interview of his translator. He told that Stalin managed to understand without him only geographical objects
Respect for showing real flags! You should do a pt. 2. I would also like to make these corrections: Germany vs. France - Germany low-diff. Germany vs. UK - Germany mid-diff. Germany vs. US - Stalemate Germany vs. USSR - Germany extreme-diff
@@cia4492 In this scenario, the U.S. will be the one attacking, so a successful defense would be a win. The U.S. could never challenge Germany on land in a 1 v. 1. I suppose in actuality it would be a stalemate since neither side could realistically challenge each other on their respective territories.
USA was barely present in Europe and wasn’t really needed. In Japan, the Soviets would have stepped in and completely annihilated them but it would have been very bloody. Really, the most important part the US played was logistics and US steel. You could remove US man power from Pacific front and western front and Allie’s probably would have still won with French and British troops in Western and Soviet on Eastern.
@@jade7631WW2 was won with american industry. British intelligence, and soviet men. So yeah the USA was not truly present in much besides that(even then the american lend lease for USSR only really rolled in after the initial burst of germans had gone far into the USSRl
@@learngeopolitic Well, if it was a 1v1 between Germany and USSR and no distractions from the allies, Germany would have a better chance at beating the Soviet Union.
Im am from germany and I hate these comments. Nobody in germany want to live in the germany 1944. Think again. We lost two world wars because there were so many countrys against us and despite it we have one of the strongest econemys and we are doing everything for peace. Thats why we hate russia and we give many weopens to ukraine to defense theyre country.
@@PipripfatThe richest country in Europe, with a very stable politic situation. They supply a lot of country in military equipment, it means that they are falling for sure 👍👍👍👍👍
Everyone forgets that Germany almost beat the ussr while fighting a 2+ front war. Being out numbered, having their factories bombed and a really long supply line. Germany could have solo’d the Soviet Union without issue.
@@tolstoy4328 that’s a laughable excuse. The Soviet numbers in the east were minimal. They outnumbered the Germans 2 to 1 when the Germans were at their height.
@@yabmozstill supplies going somewhere else, the USA giving equipment to the USSR, winter coming in, bombing of many factories, low supplies, running low on fuel and etc, they were no where near their prime when they fought the USSR in WWII, we could use prime for both teams in WWII only and Germany would be the strongest
Those same American troops when they liberated France, can we say that some old men are fighting against us? No, let them think that we fought with experienced units
Btw I want to point out that while Norway was captured there were many resistance fighters such as Joachim Rønneberg (team leader), Knut Haukelid (second in command), Fredrik Kayser, Kasper Idland, Hans Storhaug, and Birger Strømsheim, who all played a major role in preventing Nazi Germany from becoming a nuclear power
Fun fact: after America joined the war they became the strongest military on the planet which continues too the mid 1950s and too the collapse of the USSR
"Mein Fuhrer !!! The Italians have entered ze war !!!" "Mein Gott!!!! send 10 divisions !!!!" "No!!! mein Fuhrer!!! Zey haf entered on OUR side !!!" "Gott in Himmel !!!! Send TWENTY DIVISIONS !!!"
The only reason Germany lost is because they didn't factor in the harsh weather of Soviet union when they attacked.🤔 ( It's kinda crazy how usa and Soviet union had work together to stop Germany 💀)
France still had a low chance of standing for 1 year, it hard the largest amount of tanks behind the ussr, a bad air force, good tanks, not well trained soldiers, and fortifications to hold out in alsace-lorraine and some rivers, they could had also used the Ardenne forest but they did not
It is a fact that Germany had superior technology for at least 50 years at that time. Those panzers were great, the Germans were truly the kings of the industry.
Japan: *invades Pearl harbour* Italy: *Invades Greece* Germany You idiots! Atleast i didn't made a mistake. Romania: dude you invaded soviets while fighting the allies
@@learngeopoliticGermany didn’t even need to declare war on USA. They did need the industry and Oil of the USSR to stay alive, but USSR offered an alliance with it, and then they could just trade…
I mean I agree with all of these except the one about the US vs Germany. It would either be a US/German low diff since the US was basically just a smaller USSR in numbers
@@jonzed literally close, some would even consider it to be true. its just that germany was fighting on two fronts. Germany's quality of equipments were far more advanced than of USSR's equipment, though USSR has more quantity than Germany, its still a close gap between the two.
Bro actually Germany is powerful than all country coz it's top 1 in military rank at that time it's lost the war coz all the three British,Ussr, USA attacked at one County so why the Germany lost the war
Greece whooped Italy's ass bro, and the brits deserve way more respect honestly, the reason hitler couldn't invade them is because Britannia not only ruled the waves, but the skies as well.
The last one is quiet wrong actually If u compare them to power germany is manier but if personel ussr wins germany lost cuz of winter But if military only no winter allies or anything,only their weapons like tank artillery nuke sumbarine warships fighter jet momber jet plane armored truck or anything like that germany still win (Also i do not support austrian painter germany )
It’s not Italy’s fault their military was weaker than Frances but better than Greeces in every way. The problem is the incompetence of the commanders that Mussolini put in charge. They didn’t have a bad military but they didn’t compare to the great powers.
German Army stronger than red army Axis lost because of so many countries atacked not just USSR and also Japanese army was stronger than US Army just US nuked because of can’t defeating Japanese Navy
Ну да ну да. Может историю хорошо изучим чтобы такие громкие заявления делать. Кто помогал Республиканской Испании? Где были Франция и Великобритания когда Рейнскую демилитаризованную зону вновь ввели войска, а аншлюс Австрии? Ну конечно же вишенка на торте Мюнхенский сговор. Чехословакии запретили вообще сопротивление, а иначе им грозила война где Франция, Германия, Великобритания, Польша и Италия выступили единым фронтом. И кстати в 1941 году Финляндия вторглась в СССР вместе с Германией. И на них также висит вина за блокаду Ленинграда.
Corrections: Germany vs France: Germany low diff Japan vs USA: USA extreme diff Germany vs UK: Germany mid/high diff Germany vs USA: Germany high diff Germany vs USSR: Germany high diff
@slothniel8881 there is no way America would beat the Germans one on one. America might have had the best tech (in the final half of the war) but Germany had far superior firepower and manpower
@@pewpewgamesinc how did Germany have more firepower and manpower? More us troops served in ww2 than German troops did, and usa had a much bigger population than Germany, and had more tanks, planes and naval ships
Oui c'est sur ! Ils avaient la technologie et la stratégie pour perdurer malheureusement face au trop grand nombre de soviétique ils se sont fait avoir, tout comme Napoléon.
En mi opinión creo que Alemania y USA por la distancia y la logística sería un empate, no creo que uno se interponga por si solo contra el otro Aún así gran edición amigo 👍
@@luisowencarmonacruz7078 Si, es un buen punto, yo soy un fan soviético pero acepto que USA también era capaz de empatar y tal vez derrotar a Alemania, al final que también tenía una buena tecnología. Incluso UK podría empatar Alemania y firmar un tratado de paz, pero eso sí Alemania tratar de bombardear a UK ya que si los británicos atacan a Alemania no podrían desembarcar
@@Zeiler_12cierto el Imperio Británico y la URSS igualmente tenía capacidades increíbles en la WW2, desde mi punto de vista, Inglaterra, USA y la URSS, en cuestión de estrategia y recursos eran ridículamente capaces, con todo lo que eso implica. Igualmente siento que algunas operaciones de la URSS están un poco olvidadas como la invasión de Manchuria o las operaciones en crimea, mismo caso con Reino Unido con el Raj Británico y la zona del mar Indico, como Madagascar. En general, los tres países desde mi punto de vista, lograron cosas verdaderamente increíbles
Bro Germany would have beaten the shit out from everyone ! 1vs1! Always Germany wins at that time and this is a fact. U have to think about that Germany fought 4 superpowers at once !! And they all struggled without help . I respect the armies from every country and the losses ! But facts are facts, u can’t compare stones with mountains.
This is a very understanding opinion but I for one don't think Germany beats the USSR. In 1941 Germany had destroyed all its enemies (except the English). The Germans therefore began Operation Barbarossa with almost all of their divisions. But as they advanced into Russia and reached the outskirts of Moscow, the Germans had more and more difficulty. And it was from the Battle of Moscow that the Germans started to lose (and the Battle of Moscow was just the USSR against all the Axis countries).
Germany lost because they had to split there troops, resources and other things also the ussr had been helped by the usa via that usa giving them economic aid and they also gave the ussr tanks,planes etc..@@learngeopolitic
@@TheGoatKianneplus they invade both East and West. They sorrounded Germany until the USSR reach Berlin from the East. While the West invade Normandy, liberate France and other Europe. Some also went to North Africa to defeat the Germans Africa Corps where the "Desert Fox" station there.
You have to remember. They had to occupy coastal areas of France they had to occupy Balkan areas. Taking up more of the German army. And also they had to fight the allies. Now imagine. Just imagine what an appeased Germany with polish territory and not occupying and territory and their divisions being completely usable. The air force of the Germans were serverly weakened from the Battle of Britain. So they would be able to use their full force against the Soviet Union
Well, Germany would defeat anyone 1 on 1 yes, except Soviet Union. We simply had more population, more material, more oil, more of everything. And we also had superior soldiers of Turco-Mongol race (Hunnic or Tartarian race) kazakhs, uzbeks, mongols, tatars, bashkirs, turkmen, kyrgyz, saha and etc. Germans maybe best soldiers in Europe, but Turco-Mongols are best soldiers in the World.
Australia would completely loose to Hirohito Empire, japenase fought against USA, british, Netherlands, France and still resisted 4 years. They are no way Australia would beat Japan. And for USA, they literally took a while to beat them. The USA would never have beaten Germany if there weren't 3 million Germans on the Eastern Front.
@@learngeopolitic The japs couldnt even take PNG and you think they could take Australia? Australia is just too vast and unfamiliar for the japs, they would lose to the terrain on its own.
@@EDITZEDITS_1 History books that winners distort and are not real, remember that history is written by winners, not writers. Even half of Nazi Germany was enough to destroy the Soviet Union and the United States Germany was fighting with the whole world and had no powerful allies
Wrong, the USSR was getting heavily supplied by the U.S and U.S engineers helped with cheaper, better, and more efficient Tanks, motarized vehicles and other stuff. Not to mention the Germans already had a divided front against the Allies. Even better positioned troops and Tanks could've made them win. Another Factor is the fact that Germany also didn't take advantage of the population in the regions who would've chose the Nazi rule over Soviet rule.
Broski you got the Greece vs Italy wrong because of that the Greek troops were able to destroy Italian soldiers, and not only that though Italy only needed help from Germany with the Greek invasion of Albania
@@elite-ll6tk As much as I wanted it to be false, Poland and France definitely weren't carrying others. While Poland and France fought bravely, both countries got defeated fairly quickly. While hundreds of thousand of Poles and French (if not millions) did continue to fight among all the fronts and Polish and French resistance helped Allies a lot, I wouldn't say they were carrying them
Disclaimer : I do not support what Axis done ! It's important to share the crime that they done to not forget and be trap once again in a terrible era like this...
@@Sebi_JHS I do not support War in general.
Allie’s also did War Crimes the only thing what makes Axis this Bad is that Hitler killed Jews
@@Radagast01 they did terrible things especialy USSR but they do not made a genocide dude
@@learngeopolitic is that important? They knowingly killed millions of civilians in this war, they shot prisoners and doctors just as they attacked children and families with their damn planes.
@@learngeopoliticBro not Axis did. this only Nazi Germany did genocide
Germany was carrying the team but lost
Just like ww1
@@learngeopolitic Germany fucked up WW1, learn history
🇷🇺🤝🌨
@@learngeopoliticThe only Difference was that in WW1 Germany was on the good side
Germany wasn't on the good side, it wasn't on the bad side, it was on its side against the British who were on their side, there were no good or bad sides in the first world War only the second@@VoidMaster99
Germany was simply the strongest country in WW2
that's abvious
far from it..
They where strong but they overestimated their power thinking that they could just lead a war with the soviets with still being at war with the allies is dumb, they had to use all their troops into the eastern and hardly protect their beaches hence the battle of Normandy, the soviets also quickly drained the german army making both sides tired but with the sweet equipment from the usa the germans stood no chance THEY EVEN DECLARED WAR ON THE US which was another dumb decision
@@brightf4me5434 literally was soviet union saved by winter
@@makaklappa USSR is protected by Plot💀
At that time, Japan was the only Asian country recognized by Germany. 💪
Fur sure, the others country where colonised 😂 except for china etc...
Ich glaub aber das ist nicht gut
@Randomvids634korea got annexed by japan and china was in a broken civil war
@@learngeopolitices q China también fue colonia de Japón en la segunda guerra mundial, aproximadamente el 25% del territorio chino formó parte del Imperio de Japón
Now Japan is bi** of USA
WW2 was the only time the USSR and the USA decided to work together
They work together because they have to, they weren't freinds. USSR wanted to join the Axis at first 😂
@@learngeopolitic true true 😂
@@learngeopoliticit didn't want to. When studying history, it is important to take into account the context so as not to be a soyjak-😱
The Axis was initially primarily an anti-Comminter coalition (that’s why Japan suddenly appeared here)
The USSR in its “entry” looked for a practical meaning in this, for strengthening. The USSR is the first socialist state whose goal was to destroy the exploitative power in the rest of the world. Those. Germany would not be a long-term ally. Therefore, before “joining” the coalition, the USSR put forward very serious demands on Germany (which Germany did not want to fulfill), while Germany had the goal of destroying France and England (which, unfortunately for Germany, was unlucky, because Germany before the war wanted only Poland, the USSR and Eastern Europe), destroy them and only then destroy the lonely USSR with the resources of Britain and France (after the start of the war with France and Britain)
Once again: Germany proposed. The USSR, seeing the danger in Germany, put forward demands to be ready for war. Hitler was indignant, because the plans were to attack the USSR. Entry did not take place
Reactionary forces against the labor movement are precisely what drive the thesis “did you know that the USSR wanted to become part of the Axis. Oh, how bad they are😱”
A similar situation occurred when the USSR tried to join NATO. In both cases there was hypocrisy of both the Axis and NATO (NATO consists of the countries of the center of the world economic system, which feed the countries of the periphery through unequal exchange, no, this is not an accusation, this is a notification, although there are exceptions in the form of the Balkans and Turkey, there is probably a logical materialistic pragmatic explanation for this)
Don’t worry, I’m not a rabid chauvinist, xenophobe, of which there are a lot of people in MODERN parafascist Russia
@@smash3394 yeah I totaly agree with what you are saying ! thanks for teaching me a little more in depth :)
@@learngeopoliticUnfortunately, India 🇮🇳 also
Germany had drip uniforms
Na
@@EDITZEDITS_1yo I was watching your edits
@@Primitive_goat cool
fr
They used Hugo Boss clothes in Operation Barbarossa😂
At first the Greek army was defeating the Italians until when the Germans came and the Greeks were defeated
Well if it was a 1v1 it would be more likely Italian because Italy was busy in Africa and in the Mediterranean regions
@@Somegoodpersonit was 1v1 and we fuxk them we literally take half Albania and they called Germans for back up
Russia is powerful 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪
@@Somegoodpersonthey couldn’t breach mountainous terrain and even if they had more troops they couldn’t - for 500 years not even the Turks could capture Epirus which is below Albania in northern greeece
@@nickzapapp6974 honestly, i gotta agree that italy was just not that strong.
The thing is Germany did 1v4 against the Allied(USSR, USA, UK, France)☠️ also you got major respect for not censoring 1933-1940 Germany
They where in 1vs a lot after operation Barbarossa and Moscow counter attack. They fought Poland alone, they fought France alone (France was alone because we can't say that Benelux has an army, and the royal navy just spawn and then disapear), they fought Yougoslavia alone, they fought the british alone (battle of Britain) and then when Europe was under german control (except Britain) they fought USSR alone until the counter offensive in Moscow and then Free France fought in USSR Air force, USA help USSR etc.... And for not censoring Germany flag I think history shouldn't bé censored !
@@learngeopolitic but most of their allies betrayed them(except Japan and a few other countries, but Japan only focused conquering Asia and fighting USA. So Japan kinda useless) in 44-45 so it's kinda correct if Germany did 1v4
@@learngeopoliticBut where do you study history? On Mickey Mouse? In Africa England was faced by Italy. And in Yugoslavia there was the Seconda Armata, which was the only Axis army that never suffered defeat. Or the Heresgruppen B (which made up 50%of the Wehrmacht troops in Russia) in Russia managed to escape from Russia thanks to the sacrifice of the Italians. Without Italy Germany could not resist beyond 1941. Now delete your comment and go to study history before you write nonsense
@@learngeopoliticItaly has managed to break through the Ligne Alpine (Petite Ligne Maginot),and to conquer even Menton. But you’re just a French who believes in a battle that never happened
@@giudicedredd9195 First of all read again my comment, try to understand and then give a proper answer. I say that Germany fought its enemies not in 1v4 but often in 1v1 or as you say 2v2/3v3 (let's take the example of Greece where Italy and Germany fought against the Greeks and the English). Before insulting me you should try to understand the meaning of a comment. Good day.
I love this so much. Like id watch it a million times. Please make Modern version edit of this!!!
I currently doing a ww3 animation World Map like cristopher's ww2 every day with army size :)
One of the greatest short i've seen in a while. Congrats to the creator
The best edit about ww2
Thanks bro
Absolutely right
Why is everyone always talking about World War II but not World War I?
@@darilo4 WW2 is more recent, more bloody, lasted longer, was more global and was overall more interesting I would say
@@b0mbard0r46oh
Good edit
Thanks brother !
Bro Italy needed help from Germany to defeat Greece because they pushed them back into their territory💀
Italy's total military strength,economy and allies destroy Greece.
We initially lost because it was Winter,our soldiers were not motivated,and the Greek were being helped by the Brits.
See it like how Russia should be demolishing Ukraine because of his total military strength, economy and allies,but it isn't because of Nato helping Ukraine (and having better equipments.).
@@gabri0109Lil' bro trying to play being Italy in ww2 😂
@@lindawahren9267 i'm not playing.I am speaking facts.
Russia is rank 2 most strongest country in the world,and it's still not making any great advances in Ukraine since the start war.
And Ukraine is even entering Russia.
Just like Greece did with Italy, by invading the Southern part of the Italian Protectorate of Albania.
@@gabri0109that’s kinda true but I still don’t think Italy could have just sent all their troops and shi because they needed equipment
Same with Russia they can’t send 2 million soldiers because they don’t have the equipment to just send them and wipe Ukraine like a hoi4 game
@@gabri0109 κορόιδο Μουσολίνι... κανείς σας δεν θα μείνει....και εσύ και η Ιταλία η πατρίδα σου η γελοία τρέμετε όλοι το χακί...δεν έχεις διόλου μπέσα....και όταν θα μπούμε μέσα.... ακόμα και στην Ρώμη γαλανόλευκη θα υψώσουμε σημαίνει Ελληνική!!!!
Bro dropped a massive history edit😮🎉
We hate our painter but he raised an army from such a greatness...
We don’t, only the brainwashed do.
Ich persönlich hasse ihn nicht. Ich mag ihn einfach nicht. Und ja er hat wirklich Deutschland zu einer stärke und einer Einheit geführt die wir heute auch bräuchten. Militärisch gesehen.
@@pflfrodo-8472 would you be with him today if he won?
@@asmamohammed-v2e vermutlich ja, auch wenn ich die Kriegsverbrechen und die Ideologie nicht teile man würde gezwungen werden.
Alemania seguiría con alguien como el hoy, no cambiaron nada.
Respect for norway lasting 2 months
Well, Germany had to cross a sea and the Norway consists of mountain terrain. Considering this, Norway didn't last much
@@dakkossman2063Norway was caught off guard, and their defensive position got leaked by quisling.
@@dakkossman2063of all nations that fell to Germany, they lasted the longest.
W EDITS BRO🔥🔥🔥
Germany becoming so strong in the position they were in is shocking.
If Germany had as much resources as the Soviets or USA the war would have taken more than 80Mil lifes
The whole world would be under German control 😂
Nice edit
Thank's bro 💪
this was peak of your channel
When it takes 3 to 6 superpowers to take you down ⚔️⚡⚡☠️
Germany had half the Balkans, Italy, Thailand and Japan as allies tho
@@Mistergoldengamer1Japan is really the only significant ally, and they are on the other side of the world.
@@Mistergoldengamer1fright and name a single time japan and Germany cooperated or fought together other than just not attacking each other
Italy💀
@@Mistergoldengamer1 now tell me. How effective were those allies? Italy needed help with the fucking GREEK. The Balkans were mostly a non-party to the point *italy* is considered a more important factor and a major axis power. And japan couldn't help with germany. So all in all. It was germany v everyone.
There is no way ussr would have win against germany without whole allies and american industries
In would be germany wining with high diff for ussr and usa
What you say is a completely defensible point of view. But for my part, Germany could not win against the USSR even without support from the allies. Long before American industries financed certain Soviet armed forces, Russia managed to hold the siege of Leningrad alone, they managed to counter Operation Typhoon and make a counterattack on Moscow. It was from this moment (January 1942) that the Germans began to lose.
@@learngeopolitic winters slowed germans and also Americans were supporting whole finance and equipments , also germans were busy at 2 front war without American industries , British intelligence and Russian men germany could not be defeated
I don't remembered who told this quote
@@ATrivedi-sp9hs At the begining of operation Barbarossa Germany was only against USSR (the air War against brits don't count and in North Africa Italy was fighting the brits alone). Yes winter save USSR but it's normal winter is the historical savior of soviets. But I agree with you it's a real debate !
@@learngeopoliticweren't germany fighting in multiple fronts? If they have focused only on the eastern front, they would have defintely come on top
@@LL-dl3cw Yes they fought in different front but not between juin 1941 and december 1941 (operation Barbarossa time). After 1941 they have to fought in North Africa and in the eastern front + in 1943 in Italy and in 1944 in western France
That fading smile face from Stalin got me
God bless those who served and are currently serving. Amen.
Y'all fr underestimate us Aussies, we helped too! 😭
Fr
Australia STRONG 💪 🇦🇺
Fr 🤣
That’s exactly what I thought! You guys played a crucial role in stopping Japan, it should’ve been “high difficulty” or “medium difficulty” (as Britain and the kiwis helped). You guys did great!
@@SonicHuskyBritian didn't do shit. They were more focused on Germany. Thus the Australians looked to the US who helped us.
Stalin knew English and understood it
But he didn’t say... And yet he used a translator😐
He didn't speak well English. I am Russian, and I listened to an interview of his translator. He told that Stalin managed to understand without him only geographical objects
So?
@@EDITZEDITS_1 yes, Roosevelt's son confirmed it
Stalin thus gained time to think about tactics
@@dakkossman2063 сын Рузвельта подтвердил, что он знал английский
Сталин таким образом выигрывал время
@@dakkossman2063 сын Рузвельта подтвердил что Сталин знал
Yoo Adolf is killing it💀
Ik I am late but this is fire, good beans man.
Respect for showing real flags! You should do a pt. 2.
I would also like to make these corrections:
Germany vs. France - Germany low-diff.
Germany vs. UK - Germany mid-diff.
Germany vs. US - Stalemate
Germany vs. USSR - Germany extreme-diff
Thanks bro, I am currently editing an edit which will compare the Central Powers and the Triple Entente!
@@learngeopolitic I'm looking forward to it 👍🏼
The United States would absolutely crush Germany? How do you envision Germany crossing the Atlantic?
@@cia4492 In this scenario, the U.S. will be the one attacking, so a successful defense would be a win. The U.S. could never challenge Germany on land in a 1 v. 1. I suppose in actuality it would be a stalemate since neither side could realistically challenge each other on their respective territories.
😎🤙
Meanwhile: USA Supplying The Allies Even USSR And Fighting Multiple Fronts☠️
USA was barely present in Europe and wasn’t really needed. In Japan, the Soviets would have stepped in and completely annihilated them but it would have been very bloody. Really, the most important part the US played was logistics and US steel. You could remove US man power from Pacific front and western front and Allie’s probably would have still won with French and British troops in Western and Soviet on Eastern.
@@jade7631WW2 was won with american industry. British intelligence, and soviet men. So yeah the USA was not truly present in much besides that(even then the american lend lease for USSR only really rolled in after the initial burst of germans had gone far into the USSRl
@@gulsum6084 exactly. US soldiers weren’t that prevalent . It was the industry that helped win the war. Lend Lease.
Stolen killed over 1 million of his own men in the fucking Gulag yeah they had no choice to fight. No wonder Russia lost over 20 million
Germany vs uk/germany win-mid diff
Germany vs usa/ germany win-mid-high diff
Germany vs ussr/Germany win-high diff
Argument ?
@@learngeopoliticIf I send you a list of arguments proving German superiority against the URRS, will you correct the video?
Because Germany was the strongest and it was impossible to defeat it one against one@@learngeopolitic
@@tywinlannister6783wehraboo
@@learngeopolitic
Well, if it was a 1v1 between Germany and USSR and no distractions from the allies, Germany would have a better chance at beating the Soviet Union.
How painter loves his people 😢
Allied nations after ww2: 🤡
Germany: **Slowly rising**
(Iwas talking about the Current Europe)
Im am from germany and I hate these comments. Nobody in germany want to live in the germany 1944. Think again. We lost two world wars because there were so many countrys against us and despite it we have one of the strongest econemys and we are doing everything for peace. Thats why we hate russia and we give many weopens to ukraine to defense theyre country.
Germany isn't any better than the rest of Europe. It's falling, not rising
Allied nations will always be on top.
@@EDITZEDITS_1facts
@@PipripfatThe richest country in Europe, with a very stable politic situation. They supply a lot of country in military equipment, it means that they are falling for sure 👍👍👍👍👍
Bro sent us in antartica without giving a jacket🥶
Австралия: так... надо поменять флаг
Do not forget that the USSR was also at war with Japan and Japan signed the surrender after the Soviet Union entered the war
ノモンハン事件もある
違法な千島侵攻
because russia was terrified of Japan and only when everyone focused their forces on Japan did russia attack
Поэтому они проиграли за 3 недели
@@fabiankrakowski4656 No, Japan was terrified of USSR
Nice edit, congratulations🎉
Do WW1 Axis vs Allies
Everyone forgets that Germany almost beat the ussr while fighting a 2+ front war. Being out numbered, having their factories bombed and a really long supply line.
Germany could have solo’d the Soviet Union without issue.
Dont forget that the soviets also had lend lease
dont forget than ussr need protect east for japan invasion and germany had allies.
@@tolstoy4328 that’s a laughable excuse. The Soviet numbers in the east were minimal. They outnumbered the Germans 2 to 1 when the Germans were at their height.
When did they almost beat the USSR and the north african front was like what 50k german soldiers?
@@yabmozstill supplies going somewhere else, the USA giving equipment to the USSR, winter coming in, bombing of many factories, low supplies, running low on fuel and etc, they were no where near their prime when they fought the USSR in WWII, we could use prime for both teams in WWII only and Germany would be the strongest
GERMANY solo 1v1 > Soviet
@@ZioSensei no
Those same American troops when they liberated France, can we say that some old men are fighting against us? No, let them think that we fought with experienced units
Btw I want to point out that while Norway was captured there were many resistance fighters such as Joachim Rønneberg (team leader), Knut Haukelid (second in command), Fredrik Kayser, Kasper Idland, Hans Storhaug, and Birger Strømsheim, who all played a major role in preventing Nazi Germany from becoming a nuclear power
Good to know ! I think i'm gonna make a video about all the major resistance movement in ww2
Fire edit
Fun fact: after America joined the war they became the strongest military on the planet which continues too the mid 1950s and too the collapse of the USSR
До 1968 года США была на 2 месте после СССР, а так уже да вы были на первом, тут я согласен
"Mein Fuhrer !!! The Italians have entered ze war !!!"
"Mein Gott!!!! send 10 divisions !!!!"
"No!!! mein Fuhrer!!! Zey haf entered on OUR side !!!"
"Gott in Himmel !!!! Send TWENTY DIVISIONS !!!"
Great Edit!
Thanks mate 🙏
@@learngeopolitic dw keep up the good work!
you are wild bro
Thks bro
We getting nostalgia with this one
🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥
W edit
It's a disgrace that someone made an alliance with that monster Stalin
Churchill after Bengal Famine:🤫
churchill is monster aswell
@@piwo23200 Famine which was his cause
Not really sure how this is supposed to make him "less evil"
Stalin is not a monster
@@piwo23200 he literally saved the world
The only reason Germany lost is because they didn't factor in the harsh weather of Soviet union when they attacked.🤔
( It's kinda crazy how usa and Soviet union had work together to stop Germany 💀)
Nah. Its many more factors than that, including things like the fact they'd basically 1v1'd all of Europe by that point.
@gulsum6084 fax🗣️
People act like USSR didnt lose 25 million people, its not about winter its about resources and willpower war ended when germany lost stalingrad
France might diff 😁😁 France captured only 4 week 🇩🇪vs🇫🇷🇬🇧🇧🇪🇱🇺🇳🇱
Kid
@@Omagad313idi!ot🫵
France still had a low chance of standing for 1 year, it hard the largest amount of tanks behind the ussr, a bad air force, good tanks, not well trained soldiers, and fortifications to hold out in alsace-lorraine and some rivers, they could had also used the Ardenne forest but they did not
@@SomegoodpersonLol 6 week
@@trkaw lol, peoples died for this generation, funny it ain't ?
Germany technology was insane bro
It is a fact that Germany had superior technology for at least 50 years at that time. Those panzers were great, the Germans were truly the kings of the industry.
faulty transmissions: 👋
@@thesussybussy5235still the best tanks
@@Radagast01ehhh thats debatable and of course so is the better industry part, America overall was the industrial Giant compared the axis.
@@courier6733they choose amount over quality
@@SM-iz5we_elpepe02 and? Whats the point in quality if you cant equip your army with it?
You forgot Germany vs soviet union
@@FaaVoovr watch until the end
Japan: *invades Pearl harbour*
Italy: *Invades Greece*
Germany You idiots! Atleast i didn't made a mistake.
Romania: dude you invaded soviets while fighting the allies
@@ForgottenTheGoat Germany and japan made the bigest mistake
@@learngeopoliticGermany didn’t even need to declare war on USA. They did need the industry and Oil of the USSR to stay alive, but USSR offered an alliance with it, and then they could just trade…
We had to, we needed the momentum. Imagine a long time war against 3 world powers couldn't be won, so they tried all with a sneak attack.
I mean I agree with all of these except the one about the US vs Germany. It would either be a US/German low diff since the US was basically just a smaller USSR in numbers
Germany>USSR
Not even close
@@jonzed literally close, some would even consider it to be true. its just that germany was fighting on two fronts. Germany's quality of equipments were far more advanced than of USSR's equipment, though USSR has more quantity than Germany, its still a close gap between the two.
germany low diff ussr
@@Wonii-p6tGermany got bullied trying to attack 😂
@@American_bald_eagle fym got bullied, Germany was the bully. It took 3 superpowers to take them down.
Germany vs Norway was a Low diff German win. The Battle of Narvik is known to be the first battle that didn't exactly go in Germany's favour.
Didn't knew thks for the information mate 💪
Bro actually Germany is powerful than all country coz it's top 1 in military rank at that time it's lost the war coz all the three British,Ussr, USA attacked at one County so why the Germany lost the war
Greece whooped Italy's ass bro, and the brits deserve way more respect honestly, the reason hitler couldn't invade them is because Britannia not only ruled the waves, but the skies as well.
True, Hitler sent troops to occupy Greece.
The plot armour was on Soviet union
Sure !
my ancestor was a geman ww2 soldier and my family originally lived in germany but a long time ago they went on a boat to america
german
My respect for uk is so high for not giving up in that situation
Respect for every country who fought 💪
They were on the islands. They were in much easier situation than others...
The last one is quiet wrong actually
If u compare them to power germany is manier but if personel ussr wins germany lost cuz of winter
But if military only no winter allies or anything,only their weapons like tank artillery nuke sumbarine warships fighter jet momber jet plane armored truck or anything like that germany still win
(Also i do not support austrian painter germany )
Germany lost for a lot of different reason, not just "winter".
Bro you know that axis is strong as hell
3 dogs vs 1 Lion 🦁
It's more like 1 lyon vs 3 hyenas and in the end the hyenas always win
@learngeopolitic
Because Hyenas and dogs always attack from back
Not in the front
Hail ⚡⚡🫡
There is no good or bad side to any war.
No way you said Italy over Greece do you not remember what happened?
Yeah Greece beat the shit out of Italy 😅
@@AquaticMarine4it's a 1v1 tho
@@AquaticMarine4they didn't the shit out. They were winning 1v1, but were far from winning a war
It’s not Italy’s fault their military was weaker than Frances but better than Greeces in every way. The problem is the incompetence of the commanders that Mussolini put in charge. They didn’t have a bad military but they didn’t compare to the great powers.
Italy was fighting with old weapons,they were busy in Africa and the greeks were helped by the british
The Germans simply had a immense mentality to carry out these Blitzkreigs
Great edut! One thing tho, I think fir the uk vs Nazi Germany it should be UK very high to insane diff!
Love Painter ❤😭
German Army stronger than red army Axis lost because of so many countries atacked not just USSR and also Japanese army was stronger than US Army just US nuked because of can’t defeating Japanese Navy
Russia was first allied with Hitler and together they invaded Poland in 1939. And in 1941 Russia invaded Finland.
Yes !
Ну да ну да. Может историю хорошо изучим чтобы такие громкие заявления делать. Кто помогал Республиканской Испании? Где были Франция и Великобритания когда Рейнскую демилитаризованную зону вновь ввели войска, а аншлюс Австрии? Ну конечно же вишенка на торте Мюнхенский сговор. Чехословакии запретили вообще сопротивление, а иначе им грозила война где Франция, Германия, Великобритания, Польша и Италия выступили единым фронтом. И кстати в 1941 году Финляндия вторглась в СССР вместе с Германией. И на них также висит вина за блокаду Ленинграда.
@@learngeopolitiche said 1941, so it’s not correct.
They were invaded by Finland in 1941 (fair enough), and did the invading in ‘39.
So that’s false.
Great edit mate, Axis had no chance, US wasnt even trying in West, and if they wanted they could ve nuked germany
Strong edit
Bro the german army is tall as fuck bro
Corrections:
Germany vs France: Germany low diff
Japan vs USA: USA extreme diff
Germany vs UK: Germany mid/high diff
Germany vs USA: Germany high diff
Germany vs USSR: Germany high diff
Fax 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
Winther vs German : winther mid diff
USA claps Germany
@@125_xd truly fax
@slothniel8881 there is no way America would beat the Germans one on one. America might have had the best tech (in the final half of the war) but Germany had far superior firepower and manpower
@@pewpewgamesinc how did Germany have more firepower and manpower? More us troops served in ww2 than German troops did, and usa had a much bigger population than Germany, and had more tanks, planes and naval ships
Quand on voit le nombre de pays qui ont dû s'allier contre l'Allemagne c'est quand même dingue, ce pays etait une superpuissance😮
Oui c'est sur ! Ils avaient la technologie et la stratégie pour perdurer malheureusement face au trop grand nombre de soviétique ils se sont fait avoir, tout comme Napoléon.
@@learngeopoliticComment ça malheureusement 🤨
@@MrHablix malheureusement pour eux. Ne pense pas que je soutienne les fascistes
@@learngeopolitic Je sais c'était de l'humour.
@@MrHablix ahahahah
Axis: HEIL!!!
Allies: The boys meeting up
En mi opinión creo que Alemania y USA por la distancia y la logística sería un empate, no creo que uno se interponga por si solo contra el otro
Aún así gran edición amigo 👍
Thanks ! It's a good point that you share :)
@@learngeopolitic gracias amigo, mucha suerte con las ediciones 👍
Son bastante buenas 👍
Thank you brother, what you tell me warms my heart, I try to improve every day !
@@luisowencarmonacruz7078 Si, es un buen punto, yo soy un fan soviético pero acepto que USA también era capaz de empatar y tal vez derrotar a Alemania, al final que también tenía una buena tecnología. Incluso UK podría empatar Alemania y firmar un tratado de paz, pero eso sí Alemania tratar de bombardear a UK ya que si los británicos atacan a Alemania no podrían desembarcar
@@Zeiler_12cierto el Imperio Británico y la URSS igualmente tenía capacidades increíbles en la WW2, desde mi punto de vista, Inglaterra, USA y la URSS, en cuestión de estrategia y recursos eran ridículamente capaces, con todo lo que eso implica.
Igualmente siento que algunas operaciones de la URSS están un poco olvidadas como la invasión de Manchuria o las operaciones en crimea, mismo caso con Reino Unido con el Raj Británico y la zona del mar Indico, como Madagascar.
En general, los tres países desde mi punto de vista, lograron cosas verdaderamente increíbles
Alle Deutsche hier🇩🇪👑
⬇️
Für die Allierten
Axis Team here:
@@VikendiFront Nein
@@ProudGermanEditorNein
@@ExozPR Warum? Willst du etwa ein von Achsenmächten dominierten Europa? Aha
Bro Germany would have beaten the shit out from everyone ! 1vs1! Always Germany wins at that time and this is a fact.
U have to think about that Germany fought 4 superpowers at once !! And they all struggled without help .
I respect the armies from every country and the losses ! But facts are facts, u can’t compare stones with mountains.
This is a very understanding opinion but I for one don't think Germany beats the USSR. In 1941 Germany had destroyed all its enemies (except the English). The Germans therefore began Operation Barbarossa with almost all of their divisions. But as they advanced into Russia and reached the outskirts of Moscow, the Germans had more and more difficulty. And it was from the Battle of Moscow that the Germans started to lose (and the Battle of Moscow was just the USSR against all the Axis countries).
Germany lost because they had to split there troops, resources and other things also the ussr had been helped by the usa via that usa giving them economic aid and they also gave the ussr tanks,planes etc..@@learngeopolitic
@@TheGoatKianneplus they invade both East and West. They sorrounded Germany until the USSR reach Berlin from the East. While the West invade Normandy, liberate France and other Europe. Some also went to North Africa to defeat the Germans Africa Corps where the "Desert Fox" station there.
You have to remember. They had to occupy coastal areas of France they had to occupy Balkan areas. Taking up more of the German army. And also they had to fight the allies. Now imagine. Just imagine what an appeased Germany with polish territory and not occupying and territory and their divisions being completely usable. The air force of the Germans were serverly weakened from the Battle of Britain. So they would be able to use their full force against the Soviet Union
Well, Germany would defeat anyone 1 on 1 yes, except Soviet Union. We simply had more population, more material, more oil, more of everything. And we also had superior soldiers of Turco-Mongol race (Hunnic or Tartarian race) kazakhs, uzbeks, mongols, tatars, bashkirs, turkmen, kyrgyz, saha and etc.
Germans maybe best soldiers in Europe, but Turco-Mongols are best soldiers in the World.
We all know allied powers won
Costa rica in ww2 in the finish XDD
Edit is good song with it too
Good edit but American ain't loosening to the N@zis and Australia would not lose to the Japanese.
Australia would completely loose to Hirohito Empire, japenase fought against USA, british, Netherlands, France and still resisted 4 years. They are no way Australia would beat Japan. And for USA, they literally took a while to beat them. The USA would never have beaten Germany if there weren't 3 million Germans on the Eastern Front.
@@learngeopolitic The japs couldnt even take PNG and you think they could take Australia? Australia is just too vast and unfamiliar for the japs, they would lose to the terrain on its own.
@@learngeopoliticNot saying Australia would beat Japan but I would put it as mid difference. Australia was pretty strong so yea
@@learngeopolitic Australia actually held off the Japanese and pushed them out of Papua New Guinea without any American support
Too much HOI4. While US is stronger than Germany, Australia is way weaker than Japan
USSR couldn't win if usa wasnt there
Fight 1v1 with Germany = Germany vs Whole world results= Germany Wins 💪 power = Germany
I don’t think that’s what the history books say pal
@@EDITZEDITS_1 History books that winners distort and are not real, remember that history is written by winners, not writers.
Even half of Nazi Germany was enough to destroy the Soviet Union and the United States
Germany was fighting with the whole world and had no powerful allies
What bro?" Germany still lose today, but not in WW2. They win.
Udssr only survived because the support (money, weapons) from USA and the two fronts
Wrong, the USSR was getting heavily supplied by the U.S and U.S engineers helped with cheaper, better, and more efficient Tanks, motarized vehicles and other stuff.
Not to mention the Germans already had a divided front against the Allies. Even better positioned troops and Tanks could've made them win.
Another Factor is the fact that Germany also didn't take advantage of the population in the regions who would've chose the Nazi rule over Soviet rule.
Listening to: German Soldier's Song - "Erika"
01:43 ━━━━●───── 03:50
⇆ㅤ ㅤ◁ㅤ ❚❚ ㅤ▷ ㅤㅤ↻
ılıılıılıılıılıılı
ᴠᴏʟᴜᴍᴇ : ▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮▮
France isn’t mid/high diff. I know u said this because u are a French. But in real, it’s low diff.
France have the strongest Land army before 1939 dude. 5 millions soldiers, good technology but bad leadership et bad communication.
Bruh but as a result, Germany invaded France in a very short time.
Yes due to bad coordination among their forces,and they didn't upgrade their wartime strategies
@@learngeopoliticgood technology 😂😂😂 wtf it's like saying North Korea is rich country.... France was no/low diff for Germany
@@baristika do u thinks u know more about war than some germans général ?
All dominion vs Britain?
You want me to do an edit on this ?
You live longer than me, my brother 👂🌹👌
What if Stalin lost to Germany💀
Broski you got the Greece vs Italy wrong because of that the Greek troops were able to destroy Italian soldiers, and not only that though Italy only needed help from Germany with the Greek invasion of Albania
This is why we need 3 minutes short
I prefer doing lopng video if it's for explain in details.
The USSR USA and the British army was carrying the allied forces
@@SigmaProductionsisus dont forget france and poland
@@elite-ll6tk I almost forgot about them thanks for reminding me!
@@elite-ll6tk As much as I wanted it to be false, Poland and France definitely weren't carrying others. While Poland and France fought bravely, both countries got defeated fairly quickly. While hundreds of thousand of Poles and French (if not millions) did continue to fight among all the fronts and Polish and French resistance helped Allies a lot, I wouldn't say they were carrying them
@@b0mbard0r46 honestly without france and poland the german would won the war
@@elite-ll6tk Yeah, but I wouldn't say they were carrying everyone else
Axis the goat they built different
Yes, but the Japan is the only weak they haven't upgrade the tanks.
No.